0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views18 pages

Insect Pest Detection Methods

The document outlines various physical and chemical methods for detecting insect pests in grains. Physical methods include visual examination, germ damage assessment, and acoustic detection, while chemical methods involve the use of stains, flotation techniques, and spectrophotometric analysis. These methods aim to identify hidden infestations and assess the quality and damage of grain samples.

Uploaded by

amuhammad1
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views18 pages

Insect Pest Detection Methods

The document outlines various physical and chemical methods for detecting insect pests in grains. Physical methods include visual examination, germ damage assessment, and acoustic detection, while chemical methods involve the use of stains, flotation techniques, and spectrophotometric analysis. These methods aim to identify hidden infestations and assess the quality and damage of grain samples.

Uploaded by

amuhammad1
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL

METHODS OF
DETECTION OF INSECT PESTS
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL METHODS TO DETECT HIDDEN INSECTS

I. PHYSICAL METHODS

1. Visual examination:
Preliminary method
Damaged grains in the samples is indicated by loss in its
natural luster- Dull -lifeless.
Trained worker can very easily determine the qualities of grain
by its appearance.
[Link] damage and insect emergence holes:
Very simple and gives a good index of deterioration or damage to
the field workers

Does not indicate the damage going on inside the kernels

Per cent kernels damaged by insects including the germ eaten


kernels is assessed

100 g of grain sample is evenly spread out on a glass plate, the


damaged kernels are picked up to assess the percentage of insect
damaged kernels
3. Determination of foreign matter, insect infestation etc.

Using sieves insect debris, webbing, larvae, their cast off exuviae
etc, physically separated and hand picked
Rough idea of the damage

Foreign matter is also examined under microscope

4. Total damage: Quality test

Damage by heat, sprouted, mould and rotten wheat kernels are


physically separated.

This method is followed to assess the quality of grains–in


commercial
5. Germination tests:
Viability of the wheat and other food grains is reported in terms of
percentage of kernels developing strong sprouts under controlled
conditions

10 g seeds on the moist filter paper at optimum temperature.

Reduced viability indicates increase in deterioration

6. Loss in weight:

Estimated by determining volume weight ratio

A decrease in volume / weight ratio indicates an increase in


damaged kernels
(Und) – (DNu)
Dry mass loss (%) = -------------------- x 100
U (Nd + Nu)
Where,
Nu = Number of undamaged grains ;
Nd = Number of damaged grains
U = Dry mass of undamaged grains, and
D = Dry mass of damaged grains
7. Acoustic method

Sounds produced by the insects due to their movement or feeding


has been utilized in detecting insect infestation quantitatively

Possibility of detecting the dead insects are serious limitation

8. X-ray radiographic method

Internal insect infestation can be detected

All stages of development of the insects can be observed rapidly

Recently Polaroid radiographic media


9. Traps

TNAU Insect traps are excellent insect detection devices and more
effective in the detection of stored grain insects

TNAU Insect Probe Trap TNAU Pit fall trap Indicator device
10. Near Infrared Spectrometer (NIRS)

Detects and measures the chemical composition of biological materials.

Molecules comprising organic matter vibrate at frequencies corresponding to


wavelengths in the infrared region

Optical sensors measure this absorption and quantified

11. Development of a new loss-assessment method [MM]

This method is capable of determining the frass activity of beetles tunneling


through the dried chips

The increase in inner volume of a cassava chip is measurable by means of


vacuum equipment and can be converted into weight loss.
Vacuum equipment
B. Chemical method to detect Hidden infestation
[Link] of stains
a) Acid fuchsin

Mix 50 ml. glacial acetic acid in 950 ml of distilled water and add 0.5
g acid fuchsin

Soak grain samples in warm water for 5 minutes

Then immerse the soaked grain samples in the stain for 2 to 5 min.

Remove excess stain by washing in tap water.

Observe under microscope – egg plug stains show bright cherry red

While feeding punctures including mechanical injuries in light pink.


b) Gentian violet
Prepare 1% aqueous stock solution of gentian violet in 50 ml of 95%
ethanol.
 Immerse the sample for 2 minutes in a solution containing 10 drops
Observe under microscope – egg plug stains show purple colour.

[Link] sulphate

Kernels are immersed in dilute solution of the dye (20 parts per
million) for one minute

Rinsed and examined under ultra violet light

Egg plug stains show intense greenish yellow under ultra violet light.
2. Floatation or density method
 Involves the use of two solutions of different specific gravity.
 Sodium silicate in water (sp. gravity 1.160 to 1.190) and
Methyl chloroform (sp. gravity 1.30) with debase oil
 Grain is immersed in the fluids
 A three layer separation occurs
 Non-infested kernels sink to the bottom
 Infested one floats and

 Light weight kernels including those infested by early stages of


insect hang in the line of separation between the two fluids.
3. Gelatinization method
In this method the grain is boiled for ten minutes in 10%solution of
sodium hydroxide.

The treatment renders the kernels translucent, thereby, revealing


the presence of internal infestation
4. Cracking floatation method

Cleaned grain is coarsely ground to release the internal insects

Soaked either in a water-alcohol mixture or in boiling water

Mix with gasoline or mineral oil.

Insects floats with the oil layer in a flask

Collect it on a filter paper and count it


5. Fragment count or acid hydrolysis method
Presence of insects fragments such as elytra, head capsules,
mandibles, counted basically involving a flotation technique but
in a modified way.
A mixture of oil and aqueous phase (besides surfactants) is used in
making the fragments to float

Test involves digestion of a sample with an acid, wet sieving, or a de-


fating treatment using a detergent or solvent
Insect fragments which are olephilic, are separated from food
particles by the attraction of the oil phase (light) mineral oil in an oil-
aqueous mixture).
Floating fragments are trapped or filtered and examined under a
microscope. Infestation detection by the fragment count chocolate
and powdered spices.
6. Spectrophotometric analysis
De-hydroxyphenol occurring in insect cuticle is estimated by
spectrophotometer

Phenols produce certain dyes and are reacted with dichloroquinne


chlorimide.
7. Ninhydrin colour reaction: chemical indicator technique
Insects body fluid produces a colour with ninhydrin impregnate filter
paper (0.7% soln. in Acetone).
High sensitivity and specifically suitable to mechanization
A machine has also been manufactured in which wheat kernels are
crushed on a treated strip of paper tape and the same observed for
stains The machine is known as "Ashman Simon Hidden Infestation
Detector".
8. Carbon dioxide determination method

Quantity of carbon dioxide produced by a given sample of grain in


24 hours, is measured and the extent of internal infestation can be
estimated.

Representative grain sample free from moving insects in incubated


for 24 hours at 2.5°C.

The concentration of CO2 is measured with the help of gasometric


method accurate to ± 0.2 %.

You might also like