0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views34 pages

Riemann Surfaces and Moduli Spaces

The document discusses Riemann surfaces and their moduli spaces, focusing on Teichmüller theory and quasi-conformal maps. It covers concepts such as dilatation, the extremal problem, and Grotzsch's theorem, emphasizing the uniqueness of extremal quasi-conformal maps. Additionally, it introduces quadratic differentials and their significance in the context of holomorphic functions on Riemann surfaces.

Uploaded by

miru park
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views34 pages

Riemann Surfaces and Moduli Spaces

The document discusses Riemann surfaces and their moduli spaces, focusing on Teichmüller theory and quasi-conformal maps. It covers concepts such as dilatation, the extremal problem, and Grotzsch's theorem, emphasizing the uniqueness of extremal quasi-conformal maps. Additionally, it introduces quadratic differentials and their significance in the context of holomorphic functions on Riemann surfaces.

Uploaded by

miru park
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Lecture 3

Riemann surfaces and their moduli


spaces
Recall

Teich(s) = marked conformal structures on S

uniformisation
through
marked metrics S
=

hyperbolic on

Fricke : Teich(s) homeomorphic to R39-3x139-3


I
St
Fenchel-Nielsen
by IR6g-6

m
I hyperbolic
twist
parameters
red
lengths of

( curves
by
arcs
blue
Teichmiller
geometry :

conformal structure
in terms of the
change in

how does one move about in Teich (s) ?

Answer :
through quasi-conformal maps
between

marked conformat str X and Y

lots of choices but the "extremal"

quasi-conformal map is
unique
.
&
linearity Consider IR2 with standard co-ordinates .

R &2 matrix
Suppose L : >
-
is a M-linear
map
with

L
=p
of H K-linear ?
Question :

Thinking
= C
,
when is I
.
&
linearity Consider IR2 with standard co-ordinates .

R R matrix
Suppose L : >
-
is a M-linear
map
with

L =
Pq
US

of H K-linear ?
Question :

Thinking
= C
,
when is I

Need <(x + i
y) (u + iv) (x + iy) 0x)
oy +
i(uy +
= =
ux -

=> and
by
+ vx
sy
ux ve +
my
=

patgy
- =

for all (x ,
y)
nand
=)
So p
=
s =

-q = =
Dilatation

subsets of R2 and
Suppose that U and Y are
open
7 : U >
- V a
diffeomorphism
Suppose in co-ordinates &(x , y) =
(a(x y)
, ,
b(x y))
,

Total derivative

If =
Galax dalay

a blac ablay

K-linearity and
&- Ga-u a
For

Cauchy-Riemann equations .
Dilatation Let z be variable
=

sering the
complex

- and
Then

and
(a + i
= ( +

i) za)i
Cauchy Riemann
egus
(atib)
-i = -
Define (complex) dilatation as

27/az
uq
=

up
= 0 when is
holomorphic
27/27
Dilatation
Note
l-
=
The difference

lda a 2b det of
4 2a 4
=

ox
ay
It - is orientation them det + >
preserving
o

Inf)
=>
Dilatation
The dilatation off at a
point
+ |Mf(p))
(f(p) = 1

1 -

(Mf(p))

of the
Exercise :
maps
the unit circle in
targent space
at
peU to an
ellipse in the
tangent space
at f(p2 .
Kf(p) is the ratio
major axis

minor axis

Dilatation of t defined to be
Ky
=
Sup Ke(p)
where taken all
pts where f is differentiable .
Sup
is over
Dilatation Land L
*
M2
Suppose : R >
-
are linear

with dilatations Myon


and kn,
maps My , up ,

< and
Know .
Then

k( -
kyk

with
equality if and
only if
arguy
=

argus,
or if

one of L ,
L is K-linear.
I
major and minor axis match
Guasi-conformal maps
A
diffeomorphism F : V-V is a
quasi-conformal map
if KI < 0
.

In this case
,
I is a
Kf-quasiconformal map
.

Suppose f : X-Y is a
homeomorphism of Riemann

surfaces such that

If and f are differs outside a finite set of points


orientation Riemann surfaces
2 f is
preserving
-

being
X and Y are oriented
Guasi-conformal maps
Given such a homeo 7 :
X-Y ,
the dilatation Ke(p)
is well defined.

Proof: Choose charts U & and V EK about and


p

E(p) and define (P(p))


Ky(p) as
K40t0p +
.

9) r Ec and V11 are different charts then

+ Kop00
=

top- =
+o -

holomorphic holomorphic
GED .
Quasi-conformal maps
Suppose 7 : X >
-
Y
quasi- confro
conformal
- is 1
quasi-conf) + is

Proof - conformat at
: - My
=
0 all
points .

Suppose f . Then 7 conformal


is
1-quasicont is on

finite . removable
By
X- Z where I is a set

extends to conformal
singularity theorem ,
fo a
map
on .
X
The extremal problem
and marked
Suppose that (X ,
b) (Y 4), are Riemann

surfaces . Then top"


quasi-conformal .
Y
is a X >
map
-

(406") Y
Let Maps to be
quasi-conf .

maps
X-
isotopic
>

to to p Is there
-Maps (406") such that
map
· a

inf
k =

Kg ?
ge Maps (X , Y

If such to exists then it


a
map
is
unique ?
The extremal problem Teichmiller's work

extremal solution and


The
problem has a a

solution !
unique
extremal
The
quasi-conformal map
has the
property
that Kf(p) is constant on S-E .

Precursor is Grotzsch's theorem :

Euclidean
The affine
map
between
rectangles is

the extremal quasi-conformal map


.
Grotzsch's theorem :

i [0 Ka] 1] <i
Suppose X [0 a] [0 1] <
Y [o
= =
x , x ,
, ,
,

for some 11.

finite set such


Suppose f : X >
-
Y differ outside a

that
If orientation
is preserving,
f
2 takes horizontal sides to horizontal sides ,
f
3 takes vertical sides to vertical sides ,

if
then K1 * K with
equality if and
only
A is affine
Proof of Grotzsch's theorem

main idea : "extremal


length" length
- area
inequalities .

Suppose f : X >
-
Y as in the
hypothesis .

In co-ordinates f(x y) (a(x y) , b(u y))


suppose
= , ,
, .
,

Let Kf(x y) , and


JJ( y),
be dilatation and Jacobian .

Let M =

sup 1df(0)) and m = inf ld+ (0)1

veT'X oT'X
(x , (x ,
y) y)

then and
KI(x y) # J y) Mm
= =
, .
,

and
Set Fe =

( , )
(i) ·
Then Ifal M hence
Proof of Grotzsch's theorem

If Ky(k , y) Jake , 3) .

(0 2) (a , y)
-
,

length of the
image
= ( , y)/ de

Since this at least


get
length is Ka ,
we
Proof of Grotzsch's theorem

If ( ,
y)/deka

Integrating over
y ,
we
get

/Ifu/dArea < Ka K Area (X)


=

Using Cauchy-Schwarz appropriately we


get the

following string of
inequalities
Proof of Grotzsch's theorem

HaldArea
k2Area(x)
*
dArea
(SXK( 3) J
>
- ( 2)
, ,
-

=) K (x , y)
dArea)Jf(x
, 3) d Are

Area (X) Area (Y)



Ky ·

=>

Ke Area (X) ·
K Area (X)

=> K =
KI as
required .
Proof of Grotzsch's theorem

Now f X > Y S t K K
suppose
: -
. =

Replacing by Atof ,
we
may
assume we have a

affine
map
X-Y 1- quasicont mapf .
: x >
-
X

For
equality in
1fu)dx = a

(0 , 2) (a , y)

the must be horizontal line


image a .
Proof of Grotzsch's theorem

By symmetry ,
vertical lines
go
to vertical lines .

=> F(x y) ,
=
(u(x) , v(y))
Since IfnK =
1 (x , y) Ju , y) =

Jg( , 3) and

similarly 17y12 Jem 3)


=

at almost anc
=> In'(x)) =
10/ ()
every point
u'(u)2 v'(y)2
T(x y) u'(u)v'(y)
= = =

For the last two


Cauchy-Schwarz inequalities to be
equalities
-( almost
y) 1
everywhere > u'(x) v'(u) 1
= =
= a e
=

, .
.

=> and
u(x) x
v(y) y
= =

QED
.
Teichmiller's theorems

17 the extremal is to be affine what is the


map
,

Euclidean (flat) structure ?

This is
given by holomorphic/meromorphic quadratic
differentials
marked
when there are
points then need simple
poles at the marked
points and only the marked points .
Quadratic differentials
Suppose X is a Riemann surface.

K (X) =

holomorphic cotangent bundle of X

bundle with
complex line fibre K-linear
maps
from T X + K .


holomorphic 1- form is holomorphic section of K(X)
a .

A
holomorphic quadratic differential is holomorphic a

section of the
symmetric square of K(X) .
Quadratic differentials
charts .
Suppose Ex : Va >
-
& are

differential of
A
holomorphic quadratic is a collection

functions t
holomorphic &(Za) s .

1 I has
finitely many
zeroes on Va
.
2 For co-ordinate charts za and zp that intersect
any

Pp(zp) = za

formal
expression badz independent of the chart
=> the is

and defines a
global object.
Quadratic differentials
As of
a section of the
symmetric square
K(X) ,
suppose
z : - > C is a chart .
Then TzoV I
identifies with

through 0
= -
&

Then $12)dz2
Il
evaluates on a
by P(E)
(dz(x))" =
P(z)

Note q(-0) .
q(0)
=
Holomorphic A-forms

Holomorphic functions talza) sit


4plEp) =
on intersections

evaluates + (z)x .
In this case +(2)dz
1)
on o
by ↑
(E)dz(E) =

Note w(-0) =
w(r) ; also note we is a
quad differential
.

Riemann-Roch
=> dim H(g) 2g
=
-
2
,

Recall
=> dim &(g) 3g-3 dimpTeich(s) 6g
-6
=
=

,
Natural co-ordinates

differential
Suppose 9
is a
quadratic .

Suppose V is an

open
chart with no zeroes a
of

Fix po in U and define

z(p) =

) where 8 is
any
smooth

Upo -
P
arc from
po-p

Transition functions - =z
+
=
:

period of a closed curve

It all transitions are translations then we have a


holomorphic
1- form
Flat
geometry
charts to K + transitions
translations/half
I
translations

outside S-z z + z+ C z - -

z +C

structure flat metric


=>
holomorphic on all of S +

on S-Z
I
flat metric with
points at the
singular cone zeroes

+
poles of the differential .
Flat
geometry parallel and (indicated
B equal sides

C A
by the same
alphabet) are
glued
translations . The result
D D by
is 2-surface
a
genus
A C B

B
C A
S

charts to I are

D D
indicated on the
right
A C

BS
Flat
geometry

O
A

&
B I
6 B A
·
B
.
D
&

D
·

C C C

C
&
D
· A B
A ·
D
>
-
Flat
geometry
D
E C

A B

B
A

C E

D
Flat
geometry


B
&
C
B &
A
B
A ⑧ C

B
v

A
& D ⑧
A
X
C E ·

C ⑧ D ·

E
Teichmiller's theorems next week

followed class Nielsen


by mapping groups
+

Thurston classification .

You might also like