0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views2 pages

Spur Gear Design Calculations Guide

The document outlines three problems related to spur gears, including calculations for pitch diameters, number of teeth, and various dimensions for a spur gear pair with a specified module and centerline distance. It also includes a problem involving a 21-tooth pinion and a 28-tooth gear, requiring calculations for depths, diameters, and interference. Additionally, it presents a scenario with rotating gears where the resultant load on an idler shaft must be determined.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views2 pages

Spur Gear Design Calculations Guide

The document outlines three problems related to spur gears, including calculations for pitch diameters, number of teeth, and various dimensions for a spur gear pair with a specified module and centerline distance. It also includes a problem involving a 21-tooth pinion and a 28-tooth gear, requiring calculations for depths, diameters, and interference. Additionally, it presents a scenario with rotating gears where the resultant load on an idler shaft must be determined.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Module 2: Activity No.

3
Spur Gear

Name: Date:
Student No.
Problem No. 1: A machine shop fabricated a spur gear pair, 2.5 module and to be mounted on
shafts with a centerline distance of 135 mm. The velocity ratio is 3:1. For a full depth, std. 20 0
a = 1/P, b= 1.25/P backlash= 0.035m, determine the following and express all answers in mm.
a) pitch diameters g) whole depth
b) no. of teeth h) working depth
c) circular pitch i) tooth thickness
d) addendum, j) space width
e) clearance k) outside diameters
f) dedendum l) root diameters

PLACE YOUR SOLUTION HERE

Problem No. 2: A 21-tooth spur pinion mates with a 28-tooth gear. The diametral pitch is 3
teeth/in. For a full depth standard 200 teeth with addendum = m and dedendum = 1.25m,
determine the following:
a. whole depth and working depth in mm
b. tooth thickness and space width in mm
c. outside and root diameters of pinion and gear in mm
d. determine whether there is interference
e. contact ratio avoiding interference.

PLACE YOUR SOLUTION HERE


Problem No. 3: The gears shown in the figure have a pitch of 2 and a 20 deg pressure angle.
Pinion 2 rotates at 1800 rpm clockwise and transmits 200 HP through the idler pair to gear 5.
Determine the resultant load carried by the idler shaft.

PLACE YOUR SOLUTION HERE

(Draw free body diagrams. Indicate all forces and direction)

Common questions

Powered by AI

To assess interference, calculate the minimum number of teeth that will avoid undercutting, given the pressure angle and profile shift. For standard gears with full-depth teeth, the formula for minimum teeth count without interference is derived from 2*(1 + sin(pressure angle)) / (cos(pressure angle))^2. For both pinion and gear, compare actual teeth with this calculated minimum, and if either is less, interference is likely. With 21 teeth and a diametral pitch of 3 teeth/in, apply these principles to determine the presence of interference .

Gear performance hinges on material, geometry, and lubrication. High-power transmission demands materials with high tensile strength to endure loading. Gear geometry optimizes performance by ensuring that gear thickness and pitch are balanced to distribute stress effectively, while the pressure angle reduces tooth bending. Profile modifications like helical cuts, although outside standard spur configurations, can further mitigate noise and increase load capacity by allowing smoother force transmission over larger surface areas .

The module of a gear influences its size, strength, and compatibility. A larger module increases tooth size and gear strength, which is beneficial for high-load applications. It also affects the center distance between gear pairs; too large a module may impede compact design while too small may result in inadequate strength. Thus, selecting the appropriate module based on operational requirements ensures balance between mechanical demands, operational space, and gear setup .

Whole depth in gears is the sum of addendum and dedendum. Given addendum (a) and dedendum (b), whole depth = a + b. With standard values, these can substitute m (module) for a and 1.25m for b, so whole depth = 2.25m. Working depth is typically the sum of addenda of meshing gears, or 2 times a, thus 2m. For mm conversion, multiply these depths with the module value and apply it to the given gear parameters .

Idler gears, which are placed between the driver and driven gears, serve primarily to change the rotational direction of the output gear without affecting the overall velocity ratio of the system. The velocity ratio remains a function of the driver to driven gear dimensions; the idler merely transmits motion and does not alter the calculated gear ratio based on teeth count or diameter .

Tooth thickness is the arc length on the pitch circle covered by a gear tooth. Calculated by π*d/Z, where d is pitch diameter and Z is the number of teeth. Space width is the corresponding arc length covered by space between teeth, calculated similarly. The relation for standard gears is that tooth thickness plus space width equals the circular pitch. Adjustments in gear center distance require recomputation to balance these dimensions ensuring proper meshing .

The resultant load on an idler shaft is determined by analyzing the forces acting on the gears through a free-body diagram. Consider the applied tangential force (Ft) from transmitted power, where P (power) = Ft * velocity (v). Given gear pitch radius and rotational speed, calculate tangential force. Then, using cosine and sine components, resolve for axial force (Fa) and radial force (Fr). Resultant load combines Ft, Fa, and Fr using vector addition to determine magnitude and direction .

To improve the contact ratio without altering gear diameters, adjustments can be made by increasing the pressure angle or shifting the addendum. Elevating the pressure angle generally increases the overlap of teeth in contact, thereby boosting the contact ratio. Alternatively, employing profile shifts by modifying addendum and dedendum lengths can ensure greater teeth engagement over revolutions. These changes will maintain current gear sizing but improve efficiency and minimize interference .

Backlash, the clearance or play between meshing teeth, can negatively impact efficiency by causing lag in response to loads and introducing noise and vibration. Over time, excessive backlash can lead to uneven tooth wear, reducing gear longevity. However, minimal backlash is necessary for thermal expansion and load distribution. Optimal backlash balances operational slack without compromising precision, critical for high-speed applications where consistency and precision in force transmission are paramount .

The pitch diameter (d) for each gear in a gear pair can be determined by using the centerline distance (C) and velocity ratio (VR). For a gear pair, the relationship is C = (d1 + d2) / 2. With the velocity ratio given (VR = 3:1), you can find that the pitch diameter of the driver gear d1 is three times smaller than the driven gear d2. And with the module (m) given, the relationship between the number of teeth (z) and pitch diameter is d = mz. Solving these concurrently yields the pitch diameters of both gears .

You might also like