Request 1:
Project Name: "AI Mentor: Intelligent Learning Assistant System
for FPT Students"
Purpose/Objectives:
Purpose: Develop an AI-powered system to personalize the learning
experience for FPT students by providing assistance with
assignments, schedules, and career guidance.
Objectives:
1. Analyse students' academic performance and suggest
personalized learning paths.
2. Provide AI-driven responses to questions about assignments,
materials, and courses.
3. Integrate a smart chatbot capable of natural language
interaction, available 24/7.
Timeframe:
Duration: 8 months (January - August 2024)
o January - February: Requirement gathering and system
design.
o March - May: Development and AI training.
o June - July: Testing and optimization.
o August: Deployment and performance evaluation.
Project Milestones:
1. January - February:
o Conduct surveys among students and faculty to collect
requirements.
o Design the system architecture and identify AI technologies to
be used.
2. March:
o Develop the chatbot module supporting Vietnamese and
English languages.
3. April - May:
o Train the AI with data from courses, lectures, and institutional
materials.
o Integrate a learning path recommendation feature based on
grades and student preferences.
4. June:
o Pilot test the system with a small group of students and
faculty.
5. July - August:
o Fix bugs, improve the user interface, and deploy the system
across the university.
Project Constraints:
1. Cost:
o Maximum budget: $20,000, including cloud services, AI tools
(such as OpenAI API, Google AI), and personnel costs.
2. Resources:
o 1 AI/Machine Learning expert.
o 2 developers (1 backend, 1 frontend).
o 1 UI/UX designer.
o Access to student learning data and grade history from the
university.
3. Quality:
o AI must achieve at least 85% accuracy in answering questions
and providing recommendations.
o The system must handle a minimum of 500 concurrent users
reliably.
Key Features:
AI Chatbot:
o Answer questions about assignments, materials, and
schedules.
o Provide clear explanations of academic concepts.
Performance Analysis:
o Evaluate grades and learning progress to suggest appropriate
courses.
Personalized Learning Recommendations:
o Plan study schedules tailored to specific goals (e.g., exam
preparation, skill enhancement).
24/7 Support:
o Chatbot available anytime for immediate assistance.
Expected Outcomes:
Improve students' academic performance by 25% through
personalized learning paths.
Reduce workload for faculty by answering common questions
automatically.
Create an intelligent and modern learning experience, enhancing
FPT University's education quality.
Request 2:
Type of Organization Used:
The project "AI Mentor" is most likely executed by an academic
institution (FPT University) in collaboration with a software
development team or a technology company specializing in AI
solutions.
Reason:
o FPT University has access to students’ data and a clear
understanding of their academic needs, which ensures the
system aligns with the institution's requirements.
o Collaboration with an AI-specialized organization or internal AI
experts ensures the necessary expertise for AI development,
training, and deployment.
Type of Organization That Should Have Been Used:
A hybrid collaboration model involving:
1. An educational institution (FPT University): To provide domain
expertise and user requirements.
2. An AI-focused tech company or research lab: To leverage
advanced AI capabilities and expertise in natural language
processing (NLP) and machine learning.
3. Cloud service providers (e.g., AWS, Google Cloud): To ensure
robust hosting and scalability for the application.
Reason:
o A hybrid model ensures access to both domain expertise (from
FPT University) and technical expertise (from an AI firm),
which is crucial for the development of a reliable and scalable
system.
o Cloud providers offer infrastructure capable of handling real-
time interactions and large data processing efficiently.
Request 3:
Identified Risks for the "AI Mentor" Project:
1. Risk 1: Inaccurate AI Responses
o Description: The AI system might provide incorrect or
misleading answers to students due to insufficient training
data or poorly designed algorithms.
o Probability: Medium (50%)
o Impact: High (4/5)
o Response:
Ensure high-quality data is used for training the AI.
Perform extensive testing on the system with a wide
range of queries.
Continuously update and retrain the AI model based on
real-world usage data.
2. Risk 2: Data Privacy Concerns
o Description: The system could mishandle sensitive student
data, leading to privacy violations or unauthorized access.
o Probability: Low-Medium (30%)
o Impact: Very High (5/5)
o Response:
Implement strict encryption protocols for all stored and
transmitted data.
Adhere to data privacy regulations (e.g., GDPR or local
laws).
Regularly audit the system for vulnerabilities.
3. Risk 3: Lack of User Adoption
o Description: Students and faculty might not use the system
due to unfamiliarity with AI or a poorly designed interface.
o Probability: Medium-High (60%)
o Impact: Medium (3/5)
o Response:
Conduct training sessions and workshops for students
and staff on using the system.
Design a user-friendly interface with intuitive navigation.
Gather feedback during the pilot phase to make
improvements.
Scoring System:
Probability:
o Low: 0-30%
o Medium: 31-60%
o High: 61-100%
Impact:
o 1: Minimal effect
o 2: Low effect
o 3: Moderate effect
o 4: High effect
o 5: Very High/Critical effect
Request 5:
Earned Value Exercise
Example*: You have a project to build a new fence.
The fence is four sided. Each side is to take one day to
build and is budgeted for $1,000 per side. The sides are
planned to be completed one after the other. Today is
the end of day three. Calculate PV, EV, AC, BAC, CV,
CPI, SV, SPI, EAC, ETC, and VAC
Activity Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Status end of
day 3
Slide1 S---------F Complete, spent
$1,000
Slide2 S---------PF -----F Complete, spent
$1,200
Slide3 PS---S---PF 50% done, spent
$600
Slide4 PS-------PF Not yet started
Calculation Answ Interpretation of the answer
er
PV 1,000 + 1,000 + 3,000 We should have done $3,000
1,000 worth of work.
EV 1,000 + 1,000 + 2,500 We have actually completed
500 $2,500 worth of work
AC 1,000 + 1,200 + 2,800 We have actually spent $2,800
600
BAC 1,000 + 1,000 + 4,000 Our project budget is $4,000.
1,000 + 1,000
CV 2,500 – 2,800 -300 $300 over budget
CPI 2,500 / 2,800 .893 We are only getting 89 cents out
of every dollar we put into the
project.
SV 2,500 – 3,000 -500 We are behind schedule
SPI 2,500 / 3,000 .833 We are only progressing at 83%
of the rate planned
EAC 4,000 / .893 4.479 We currently estimate that the
total project will cost $4,479
ETC 4.479 – 2,800 1,679 We need to spend $1,679 to
finish the project
VAC 4,000 – 4,479 -479 We currently expect to be $479
over budget when the project is
competed.
Current Status Forecast Recommended
Adjustments
Ahead of schedule, Project will finish early Reallocate resources;
under budget and save costs. ensure quality; utilize
(Vượt tiến độ, dưới (Dự án hoàn thành saved budget for
ngân sách) sớm và tiết kiệm chi enhancements.
phí.) (Tái phân bổ tài
nguyên, cải tiến
thêm.)
Behind schedule, Project will be late but Add resources; remove
under budget budget allows for bottlenecks; monitor
(Chậm tiến độ, dưới acceleration. cost control.
ngân sách) (Dự án sẽ muộn nhưng (Bổ sung nhân lực, loại
đủ ngân sách để tăng bỏ trở ngại, kiểm soát
tốc.) chi phí.)
Ahead of schedule, Project will finish early Reduce unnecessary
over budget but exceed costs. tasks; optimize
(Vượt tiến độ, vượt (Dự án hoàn thành resources; tighten cost
ngân sách) sớm nhưng vượt ngân control.
sách.) (Giảm công việc không
cần thiết, tối ưu tài
nguyên.)
Behind schedule, Project will finish late Prioritize scope; fix
over budget and costly. budget issues; speed
(Dự án muộn và chi up progress; negotiate
(Chậm tiến độ, vượt phí cao.) timeline or budget.
ngân sách) (Ưu tiên phạm vi, khắc
phục chi phí.)