0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 15 views 6 pages Chapter 1
The document provides a comprehensive overview of the history of correctional systems, tracing their evolution from ancient times to the modern era. It highlights key milestones, such as the establishment of the Code of Hammurabi, the development of the modern prison influenced by figures like Jeremy Bentham, and significant reforms led by individuals like John Howard and Elizabeth Fry. The text also discusses various penal systems and philosophies that emerged over time, emphasizing the shift towards rehabilitation and humane treatment of inmates.
AI-enhanced title and description
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
BRIEF HISTORY OF CORRECTIONS 3
CHAPTER 1
BRIEF HISTORY OF CORRECTIONS
Learning Objectives —
at the end of this chapter, the student will be able to:
* Understand the importance of correctional systems;
Learn the important milestones in the history of
.
corrections; and
«Know the different concepts of correctional systems
HISTORY OF CORRECTIONS
Ancient Times
Welch (2004) traced back the beginning of prisons to the rise of
i form of social organization. Along with the advent of
itten language was Clesmlged which led to the creation
a formalized legal codes as official guidelines for society. The Code
lammurabi, written in Babylon around 1750 BC, was the mom
popular of these early codes. In this Code, penalties for law violation:
a on the concept of lex talionis (“the law of retaliation”) where
of oo were punished, often by the victims themselves, as a form
can on This concept of punishment as vengeance or retaliation
ara * found in many other legal codes from early civilizations,
Astra, te, whe Ancient Sumerian codes, the Indian Manama Dharma
» the Hermes Trismegistus of Egypt, and the Mosaic Code.INSTITUTIONAL CORR!
en Europe
Barly Modern including Plato, began
rent to reform offenders instead
tially, those who could not aor,
simply using it to aly, thos :
imply using it 19 eee imprisoned. Eventually, }
es, had to be held eS
periods of imprisonment to be app)
became the reas
instead,(Allen, 2003] : :
nw used various structures to house PriSOMers. These
tnchted faa Mae jasement® of public buildings, and quar,
included meta prison, established around 640 B.C. Located within a
Te Mamereeath ancient Rome, it contained ¢ large network o
seeeeone where prisoners were held in subhuman, tii
qunster common form of punishment was
avs projects. Prisoners were often Ket
Middle Ages to the 17th Century
‘Turing offenders into gale sas
to row naval or merchant r
Castles, fortresses, and the basements of put
caer shift prisons during the Middle Ages in Burope.
$e mneon citizens, legitimized the existence of officials at al lev!
epermnment, from city councils to sovereign kings. The same caps)
fo have people incarcerated or even killed gave some officials that S°™*
Sfpower o authority over others. [Turning, 2012]
Spierenburg (1998) gave some insights into the penalt
in early modern Europe, which usually consisted of p
being exposed in public places where they were scorned by passe"
From the Middle Ages up to the 16th and 17th centuries in Europ
imprisonment per se was 1
Prisons were mainly to hold those awaiting trial and convicts
punishment.
‘The Bridewell House of Corrections, located at Bridew"
in London, was a significant milestone during this period e
history when it led to the establishment of other correctional {%
‘These houses held mostly petty offenders, vagrants, and 1c!
ty practie®
1770s and in Austr
the early 18th century. The toughest pei
du Diable (Devil's
BRIEF HISTORY OF CORRECTIONS 5
_—________*_ rier nistory oF CORRECTIONS _5_
troublemakers. Inmates were given jobs and were taught how to work
for a living. Towards the later part of the 17th century, these houses
of correction were absorbed into local prison systems managed by the
local Justices of the Peace,
Modern Era
‘The 18th century saw widespread resistance to public execution
and torture both in Europe and in the United States. The public
particularly objected to death penalty being imposed even for petty
crimes. Many jurors refused to convict defendants when they knew
they would be sentenced to death for committing minor offenses. Heads
of states were hard-pressed for alternative ways of punishments that
would not picture them as heartless rulers. These rulers saw mass
imprisonment, often coupled with hard labor, as the more suitable
form of sanction, (Foucault, 2012; Kann, 2005)
[At this time, the philosophies that heavily influenced the penal
reform movement were contradictory in nature. On one side there was
the suggestion that prisons should be ised simply as a more humane
fubstitate for public corporal punishments, such as whipping. or
hanging. This theory, aimed at being a deterrent, claims that prison
Conditions should be so harsh and tering that they sow fear among
Sould-be offenders, On the other side was the theory that regarded
pasone as a form of rehabilitation of moral reform. It sprang fo
os belief that saw crime and sin in the same light, and regarded
fons as a place to teach prisoners concepts of Christian morality
Ee thavior
Modern reformers believed that prisons could be turned into more
humane institutions where prisoners can be taught proper behavior
and could still be productive when they reunite with the rest of society
after they have served their term in prison. |Lewis, 2009],
Penal Colonies and Prison Ships
An alternative to the death penalty for many offenses in the British
Empire was the practice of transporting convicted criminals to penal
‘This was also done in the An
between 1788
icas between the 1610s and
1868.
France also used tropical penal colonies including Louisiana in
1 colony of all time was Ile
land). From 1852 until its shutdown in 1946, it6 _ INSTITUTIONAL CORRECTIONS
has become
s slowly stopped in Englan,
g vessels were used as,
mn
ned authorities that mas,
was a viable way of preventing
Prison Reform Movement
Early prison reform saw a champion in John Howard, a High
sheriff of Bedfordshire, London. He visited several prisons in Englané
‘ope, and published The State of Prisons in England and Walesin
contained very detailed accounts of the prisons he had visited
disturbed by his discovery that some prison:
who had been acquitted were still detained because they could not pa
‘ler's fees or the amount due those who owned the prison hou
the j
He then proposed several reforms through the Penitentiary Act, wh
- British Parliament in 1779.
.¢ Penitentiary Act had four basic princi abolition «
jailer’s fees, (2) regular inspection of prisons, (3) provision o
emphasis on reforming inmates. Howard's rel
‘ned discipline and humanitarian philosophy. It also incorP
jous teachings, as well as productive labor and daily '
[Welch, 2004]
Quakers, ar
We
jous movement formed after the English Civ
so spearheaded prison reforms, The mover
their primary recrul
Welch also mentioned Elizabeth Fry, a
who wrote about the conditions that prevailed at Newgate
dies’ section in on was overcrowded with women and
slept on straw. Fry found
who were imprisoned with
wn for the Refor
BRIEF HISTORY OF CORRECTIONS _7
Development of the Modern Prison
The foundation of the modern prison system which was laid in
London, was influenced by Jeremy Bentham’s panopticon, a design
that consisted of a circular structure with an “inspection house” at the
‘enter, from which the manager or staff of the institution were able
to watch the inmates, who were stationed around the perimeter. This
principle of observation and control became the basis for the design of
the modern prison. The notion of prisoners being detained as part of
their punishment and not simply as a temporary holding state until
trial or hanging, was at the time revolutionary. His views influenced
the establishment of the first prisons used as criminal rehabilitation
centers, This thinking appealed to politicians and intellectuals who
‘were hungry for reforms. In the first half of the 19th century, capital
punishment was deemed inappropriate for many crimes that it had
previously been carried out for. By the mid-19th century, imprisonment
had replaced the death penalty for the most serious offenses except for
murder.
Other milestones were also noted during this period:
Millbank Prison, the first state prison in England that
housed less than 1000 inmates, was established.
Robert Peel’s Gaols (Jails) Act of 1823 introduced
regular visits to prisoners by chaplains, provided for
the payment of jailers, and prohibited the use of irons
and manacles.
FE
| 1824 _54 prisons adopted the disciplinary system advocat
r by the SIPD of London. oe ma
1840s Transporting prisoners to Australia and the use of sea
vessels for this purpose started to decline.
Joshua Jebb, Surveyor-General of convict prisons
Started @ program in which one large prison was
opened per year.
Pentonville prison opened and started a trend of using
prison as the primary form of crime punishment.8 _ INSTITUTIONAL CORRECTIONS:
—______bnterisrony or connterions_9 _
were largely impleme;
puropean countries, ;
nglish-speaking coy,"
n after 1861,(Git,.
tor and scholar who studied,
handed dowr
and emphasizing dis
were still crammed in large rooms, alcohol use was common, and
inmates had become riotous and prone to escapes.
The Auburn system of New York was developed in an attempt
implement a more rehabilitative process. Prisoners were confined in
separate cells and were not allowed to talk when eating and working
together. Almost all states adopted it and it became so famous that it
3000} Cesare Lombr0s0. 1's physical and mental characteris ses works. One of the visitors
aoe chip between tecrimina ee oe developmen ttfacted vistors to th U.S, to observe how it works. One ofthe visit
{his behavior, provided buge © ee eda ae was French historian Alexis de Tocqueville who wrote Democracy in
and hi He was later Teg America. [Bosworth, 2002}
fn advanced penology in Italy.
12)
a aca ninology. [Knepper & Ystehede, 2012]
Penology Reforms in the United States
¢ Pennsylvania passed a law in which
‘ed the death sentence, would be forcsi
ich as building roads, -forts, and min:
ly to be a source of free labor, b
to discourage criminal activity by setting a scenario of (he Kindo
that awaited lawbreakers. Unfortunately, it only resulted in cist
conduct of prisoners. Worse, it directed sympathy to the conv
the citizens who saw how the inmates were maltreated. The
highly criticized for being cruel and degrading, and for failing
the incidence of crime
In 1786, the state of
convicts, except those met
do public works projects su
‘The law was expected not onl
As a solution, reformers such as Dr. Benjamin Rush, a 92%
of the American Declaration of Independence, proposed a com
that would allow the practice of forced labor, but would not 2!"
public to witness the abuse inflicted on the prisoners. The su
was to send the prisoners to secluded “houses of repentane
they would be subjected to the usual physical pain, hard
solitude but out of the public eye. As a concession, they
cleaner facilities and simple food.[MeClennan, 2008]
yen
ate Po
This theory was put into practice in 1790 when P
turned its old jail at Walnut Street in Philadelphia into 2S!
This became the model for the “Pennsylvania system” (0°
system”), in which all prisoners were placed in solitary cel
religious literature, and were forced to be completely silent '°
their sins.(Murty, 2004] The Newgate state prison in Green
New York, was also modeled on the Pennsylvania system.[L¢"
Other states soon followed.
‘The value of legal reform came under fire by 1820 whe?
‘changes on the level of crime’and the prisons could be see” "
SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS IN PRISON DESIGN AND
SYSTEMS IN THE UNITED STATES
‘Walnut Street Jail
The Walnut Street Prison was a pioneering effort in prison reform.
Originally builtas aconventional jail just before the American Revolution,
it was expanded in 1790 and hailed as a model of enlightened thinking
about criminals. The prison, in fact, was known as a “penitentiary”
(from the Latin word for remorse). It was designed to provide a severe
environment that left inmates much time for reflection, but it was also
designed to be cleaner and safer than past prisons: It became the first
state penitentiary in the country.
‘The main addition to the Walnut Street complex was a new
celiblock called the “Penitentiary House.” Built in the courtyard of the
existing structure, it included a series of small cells designed to hold
individual prisoners. The cells and the corridors connecting them were
designed fo prevent prisoners from communicating with each other.
Each cell had a mattress, a water tap, and a privy pipe. Inmates were
confined to their cells for the duration of their confinement. The only
person they saw was the guard and then only briefly once a da
Legal Encyclopedia, 2016}
Eastern State Penitentiary
Eastern State Penitentiary set the standard for penal reform,
with its massive, castle-like Gothic architecture designed by British
architect John Haviland. It occupied all of 11 acres and had central
heating system, running water and flush toilets. A number of big-name
criminals, including Al Capone, served time here.
The prison was the first to use solitary confinement, as reformists
felt that isolation led to reflection and ultimately penitence. TheP INSTITUTIONAL CORRECTIONS
le. The penitentiary had a distinct,*
ecalguate vier at
Seman coenaic ean
Mbandoned in 197) ae a8
Yaris tandmati and are
tary confinement
at lent system, which
evolved during the 1820s at Auburn Prison in Auburn, N.Y., was a
modification of the Pennsylvania system of solitary confinement, which
it gradually replaced in the United States. Both the Pennsylvania and
Auburn systems were based on the belief that criminal habits were
learned from and reinforced by other criminals. Some significant
features of the system include the lockstep (marching in single file,
placing the right hand on the shoulder of the man ahead, and facing
foward the guard), the striped suit, two-foot extensions of the walls
between cells, and special seating arrangements at meals—all designed
to ensure strict silence.
Elmira System
This American penal system intended. for young felons was
named after the Elmira Reformatory in New York. It was an innovat:
of Zebulon R. Brockway, a noted reformer who was inspired by the
“mark” system developed in Australia by Alexander Maconochie, Under
this system, inmates were awarded credits or marks for good behavior.
‘A certain number of marks was required for release. Brockway added a
new regimen of moral, physical, and vocational training to the system
Prisoners were classified and separated and received individualized
treatment emphasizing vocational training and industrial employment.
It differed from many prisons then as it focused on reformi
the convict using psychological rather than physical methods. The
tn con wnt he refernatery tcuded coumsea Drea, THe
Prvon, vocational training in various trades, end exiaeeso oe
activities, such as a prison band and various athletic leagues
SL ltl
BRIEF HISTORY OF CORRECTIONS
Discipline was largely patterned after military academies. Inmates
were classified into three “grades.” New prisoners were placed at second
grade for their first six months, The most responsive and cooperative
prisoners earned a first grade, with the opportunity to earn additional
privileges or “marks,” including reduction of their sentences or being
granted parole, Those who were less responsive to rehabilitation or had
behavioral problems were placed at third grade
had mixed results. Tension got high
.d on how long their detention
hat eventually resulted
The system, however,
because prisoners were often not informe’
would last. The “Paddler Brockway” system th
in the transfer of several prisoners to mental asylums, caused some
‘the Elmira system was
to question the reformatory system: Still,
influential in prison reform for two Seasons ieee be
_ juvenile and adult offenders, and acknowl oss
i mn.
‘Spitamencibbiies
In the late 1970s through late 1980s, college professors from
Corning Community College volunteered to lecture within the prison,
‘and inmates were able to earn an associate degree. However, during
the recession of 1990-1992 there was a public outcry over spending
taxpayer money to educate felons while many middle-class families
struggled to pay their children’s college tuition. Asa result, the program
was cut, and although there were attempts to revive it, eventually it
‘was completely terminated.
SIGNIFICANT TRENDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CORRECTIONS
1. Age of Reformation — Replaced corporal punishment, exile,
and physical disfigurement with the penitentiary.
Age of Rehabilitation ~ Assumed that criminal were
handicapped persons suffering from mental or emotional
deficiency. Under this, individual therapy aimed at healing
these personal maladjustment became the preferred system.
Age of Reintegration — Society becomes the patient as
well as the offender. Much more emphasis is placed on the
pressure exerted on the offender by the social groups to
which he belongs and on the society which regulates his,
opportunities.INSTITUTIONAL CORRECTIONS
——nment connections —_________
isaeuphemism ora more politically accept,
and prisons. For many professionals invo)
though, the word represents a sense of hope 1, |
‘h—the ones commonly referred to as crim
istakes and return to society as produ,
rhe history of corrections is full of various interpretai
of segregating criminals from society. The debate o
the people they deal
can learn from
citizens.
needs to rethink and redesig
treatment process in order to keep up with the new
the modern approaches to rehabilitation, and to comply with the gi
standards in the treatment of offenders. |
EXERCISES
Student's Name:
Year/ Section:
Instructor:
‘School:
Review Questions:
1. Explain the concept of correction,
2. Relate how the concept changed from one era to another.