Climate Change and Indian Agriculture:
Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Editors
Ch. Srinivasa Rao
Tavva Srinivas
R.V.S. Rao
N. Srinivasa Rao
S. Senthil Vinayagam
P. Krishnan
ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management
Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture:
Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Editors
Ch. Srinivasa Rao
Tavva Srinivas
R.V.S. Rao
N. Srinivasa Rao
S. Senthil Vinayagam
P. Krishnan
ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management
Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Preferred Citation of Book
Srinivasarao, Ch., Srinivas, T., Rao, R.V.S., Srinivasarao, N., Vinayagam, S.S., Krishnan, P. (2020).
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies,
ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad,
Telangana, India. p-584.
Preferred Citation of Chapters
Kumar, K., Bhattacharjee, S., Vaikuntapu, PR., Sharma, CL., Jayaswal, D., Sharma, R.,
Sundaram, R.M. 2020. Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Through Biotechnological
Interventions. In: Ch. Srinivasarao et al., (Eds). Climate Change and Indian Agriculture:
Challenges and Adaptation Strategies, ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research
Management, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. pp-1-22.
ISBN No. : 978-81-943090-7-9
Published by
Director
ICAR-NAARM
Hyderabad - 500 030
July 2020
For Copies contact:
Director
ICAR-NAARM
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030
Telangana, India
Tel: 040-24581322/24581285
Fax: 040-24015912
Email: director@[Link]
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
CONTENTS
[Link]. Title Page No
Foreword
Preface
1 Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation through 1
Biotechnological Interventions
2 Exploration of CRISPR/Cas Toolbox for Developing 23
Climate-Smart Plants
3 Accelerated Crop Breeding towards Development of 49
Climate Resilient Varieties
4 Offsetting Climate Change Impact through Genetic Enhancement 71
5 Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation through Soil Management 105
6 Resource Conservation Technologies for Climate Change Adaptation 131
and Mitigation
7 Climate Smart Soil and Water Management Strategies for 157
Sustainable Agriculture
8 Can Planting Trees Avert Climate Emergency? 183
9 Physiological Responses and Strategies for Temperature and Water Stress 199
Tolerance in Plants
10 Impact of Climate Change on the Production of Secondary 215
Metabolites in Plants
11 Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate 245
Smart Agriculture
12 Impact of Climate Change on Host-Pathogen Interactions and 271
its Implications on Crop Disease Management
13 Impact of Climate Change on Pests and Their Management Options 295
with Emphasis on Identi cation of Adaptation Strategies
14 Quality Seed and Climate Resilience: Challenges and Opportunities 311
15 Climate Smart Technology Based Farm Mechanization for 325
Enhanced Input Use Ef ciency
16 Climate Smart Post-Harvest Agriculture and Food Systems 359
17 Approaches for Managing Post-Harvest Handling in Climate 385
Disaster Prone Areas
18 Climate-Smart Livestock Farming in India: Addressing Issues and Challenges 397
19 Climate Change Versus Livestock Health: Impact, Mitigation and Adaptation 431
20 Hazards in the Wake of Climate Change Induced Extreme Weather 449
Events and Their Impact on Indian Fisheries
21 Role of Arti cial Intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT) in 465
Mitigating Climate Change
22 Recent Advancements in Arti cial Intelligence (AI) and 473
Internet of Things (IoT) for Ef cient Water Management in Agriculture
23 Climate Change and Agriculture: An Economic Perspective 485
24 Impact and Adaptation Strategies in Horticulture Sector in a Climate 501
Change Environment
25 Climate Change and Livestock Sector in India: Issues and Options 517
26 Role of Genomics in Agriculture in Age of Climate Change 539
27 Application of Bio-Informatics in Climate Smart Agriculture 561
28 Institutional Linkages and Community Partnerships for 569
Climate Resilient Agriculture
Authors Index
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
1
Devendra Singh ,
1
Shobit Thapa , Relevance of Plant
Himanshu Mahawar1,
Saurabh Kumar1, Associated
M. Manjunath2 and
P.C. Latha
3 Microorganisms in
1
ICAR-National Academy of
Climate Smart
Agricultural Research
Management, Hyderabad,
Agriculture
Telangana
2
ICAR-Central Research
11
Institute for Dryland
Agriculture, Hyderabad,
Telangana
Abstract
3
ICAR- Indian Institute of
Rice Research, Hyderabad,
Telangana
The negative effects of climate change are occurring all over the world.
These include rising temperature and sea level, unseasonal rainfall, drought,
oods, etc. Agricultural production is also severely getting affected due to climate
change. Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) is a sustainable approach to increase the
adaptability of agricultural production systems to improve crop production under
changing climatic conditions. CSA also draws attention to reduce greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions and to improve carbon stability in soil. Agriculturally bene cial
microorganisms assume signi cant role in climate smart agriculture. They can help
to enhance adaptation, mitigation and build resilience to climate change effects.
Plant bene cial microorganisms are fundamental to different bio-geochemical
process in soil viz., organic matter decomposition, carbon cycle, nitrogen cycle,
phosphate solubilization and mobilization, nitrogen xation, and acquisition of
micronutrients. Microorganisms also facilitate the crop plants to withstand various
abiotic stresses viz., elevated temperature, elevated CO2, moisture stress, salinity
stress, and metal toxicity. Methanotrophs, methylotrophs and photosynthetic
microorganisms play the important role in mitigating the greenhouse gases. Soil
microorganisms also have crucial role in carbon sequestration in soil. Microbial-
based technology is low cost, eco-friendly and sustainable. Biofertilizers and
biopesticides being the major components of integrated nutrient and insect-pest
management, as well as one of the key elements of climate smart agriculture, the
application of bene cial microorganisms reduces the use of synthetic agro-
chemicals, sustains the soil health and soil biodiversity, and enhances the plant
growth.
Key words: Abiotic Stresses, Climate Change, Carbon Stability, Climate Smart
Agriculture (CSA), Greenhouse Gas, Nutrient Management.
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies 245
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
responsible for both production and
I. Introduction consumption of greenhouse gases
Climate change refers to any such as carbon dioxide, methane and
signi cant statistical change in the nitrous oxide. The large diversity of
distribution of weather patterns over microbes provides an opportunity to
an extensive period of time which can explore and exploit untapped
range from decades to millions of microbial resources for improving the
years (Enete and Amusa, 2010). It can ef ciency of agricultural production
be due to a number of factors like systems by enhancing the adaptation
oceanic circulation, variations in solar and mitigation options to overcome
radiation, plate tectonics, volcanic the negative effects of climate
eruptions, and anthropogenic change so as to achieve the goal of
interventions. Rise in atmospheric climate-smart agriculture. A thorough
concentrations of greenhouse gases understanding of microbial ecology
(GHGs), e.g., CO2, CH4 and N2O, is the and soil-plant-microbe interaction in
principal cause of global climate a changing climate scenario is
change (IPCC, 2013). essential to make best use of
microbial technology for climate
Changes in the climatic conditions are
change adaptation and mitigation.
directly or indirectly affecting the life
on earth by signi cantly impacting
not only human or animal life but II. Role of Agriculturally
also that of plants and Important Plant
microorganisms. Extensive melting of
polar ice, accelerated rise in sea level, Associated
more intense heat waves, longer
periods of drought and increase in
Microorganisms
the number, and duration and Microbial inoculants are an
intensity of tropical storms are due to attractive eco-friendly alternative to
global climate change. These extreme chemical fertilizers and pesticides.
conditions are signi cantly affecting They exert bene cial effects on soil
plants and microorganisms. Climate and plant health by different
change affects agriculture in a mechanisms highlighted below.
number of ways which include
II.1 Nutrient Management and
changes in average temperature,
Biofertilizers
rainfall, growing season, pests and
diseases incidence, nutritional quality The ef cient crop production
of some foods, and soil erosion due to depends on the nutrient status of the
intermittent oods and drought soil that is vital for sustainable
(World Bank, 2008). agriculture. Chemical fertilizers are
primarily used to increase the crop
Microorganisms are the most
yield. However, their indiscriminate
important components of agricultural
use has led to serious environmental
ecosystem (Mohanty and Swain,
consequences. Nowadays, more
2018). They perform essential
emphasis is being given to
functions in biogeochemical cycling of
biofertilizers and other organic
nutrients such as carbon, nitrogen,
sources of nutrients. Biofertilizers are
phosphorus, and sulphur. They are
246 Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
the preparations consisting of Rhizobium, Azotobacter,
bene cial microorganisms, either live Azospirillum, etc. x atmospheric
or latent cells that when applied nitrogen (N2) to plant available form
improve the nutrient status of the soil through the process of nitrogen
and facilitate their accessibility to xation (Shabbir et al., 2019).
crops by various mechanisms (Fu et Symbiotic associations involving
al., 2017). The rise in the awareness of Rhizobia-legume is the most
people about the adverse effects of important N- xation system
chemical fertilizers has led to contributing up to 230 kg N/ha
increased use of microbial inoculants annually, and non-symbiotic
as biofertilizers in organic farming associations also contribute to the
and integrated farming systems. tune of 13-22 kg N/ha (Bargaz et al.,
Regular application of organic and 2018). Similarly, phosphorus is an
inorganic fertilizers in a balanced important nutrient for plant growth;
proportion would help to enhance but majority of the applied
soil organic carbon and soil microbial phosphatic fertilizers immediately
activity (Vineela et al., 2008; gets xed in the soil and becomes
Srinivasarao et al., 2018). Long-term unavailable to plants. Phosphorus
(18-21 years) studies conducted in two solubilization by synthesis of organic
cropping systems viz., upland rice- acids by the microbes is an important
lentil sequence and pearlmillet- part of nutrient management as they
clusterbean-castor rotation in improve the soluble or plant available
Inceptisols of sub-humid region of forms of phosphorus. Microorganisms
Varanasi and Entisols of the semi-arid such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas,
region of Gujarat, respectively Penicillium, Flavobacterium,
revealed that use of 50 per cent Aspergillus, and Micrococcus have
reduced dose of chemical fertilizers in been reported to carry out the
combination with FYM enhanced the process of phosphate solubilization
soil microbial activities in both that adds up to 30-35 kg P2O5/ha
Inceptisols and Entisols (Srinivasarao (Gaur et al., 2004). The process such as
et al., 2018). Combination of organic assimilation and dissimilation of
nutrients such as poultry manure @ nitrogen, phosphorus, magnesium,
2.5 t/ha + vermicompost @ 3.5 t/ha iron, etc. plays signi cant role in
stimulated the metabolically active effective management of these
soil microbial communities in nutrients and their availability to
vegetable cropping system of the plants (Lalitha, 2017). In recent
Indo-Gangetic plains (Manjunath et studies, siderophore producing
al., 2018). (Arthrobacter sulfonivorans DS-68
and Enterococcus hirae DS-163) and
Nitrogen, being the major component
Zn solubilizing (Bacillus subtilis DS-178
of chlorophyll, is vital for plant
and Arthrobacter sp. DS-179) bacteria
growth and development besides
played signi cant role in
being conspicuous in plant
micronutrients acquisition in wheat
metabolism. Therefore, nitrogen
grains besides enhancing the plant
availability and management is the
biomass and yield (Singh et al., 2017a,
key factor in governing the plant
2017c, 2018, 2020).
growth. Microorganisms like
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies 247
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
a. Organic Matter Decomposition Verticillium. Lignin is degraded
primarily by white rot fungi
Soil Organic Matter (SOM)
(Phanerochaete chrysosporium,
decomposition is the biological
Coriolus versicolor and Trametes
transformation of complex organic
versicolor), brown rot fungi
matter into simple inorganic
(Fomitopsis palustris) and ascomycetes
compounds. Decomposition of SOM
(Trichoderma reesei) (Dashtban et al.,
results in stabilized organic matter
2010). The organic wastes are
which is further resistant to microbial
converted into valuable resources like
decomposition and termed as humus.
plant nutrients, thus maintaining the
This humus plays crucial role in soil
ow of nutrients from one system to
aggregates formation and improving
the other. The composting process
water and nutrient holding capacity
takes place in three phases, and uses
of soil. Soil organic matter is mainly
diverse micro- ora such as bacteria,
derived from the plant residues. The
fungi, and mesophilic (Streptomyces
SOM decomposition is carried out by
rectus) and thermophilic
heterotrophic microorganisms
actinomycetes
comprising soil bacteria, fungi,
[Actinobi dachromogena
protozoa, and actinomycetes.
(Thermomonosporafusca)
Cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin
Microbisporabispora,
are the major components of soil
Therinomnonosporacurvata, and
organic matter which are degraded
Thermoactinomyces sp.] eventually
comparatively slower than the other
converting organic waste to humus
components like sugars, amino acids
(Pan et al., 2012). Compost prepared
and lipids (Pérez et al., 2002).
from bixa capsule shells by
Earthworms also play an important
inoculating Trichoderma +
role in the initial breakdown of
Phanerochaete and effective
organic residues.
microorganisms led to the
Cellulose degrading fungi include enhancement of nutrient content i.e.,
Trichoderma, Phanerochaete, total N (47.5% to 161%),
Penicillium, and Aspergillus. exchangeable K (25% to 88%),
Cellulomonas, Clostridium available P (36% to 150%) and
thermocellum, Streptomyces, and calcium (19.4% to 94.4%) (Pratibha et
Pseudomonas are the bacteria al., 2013). The microorganisms also
involved in cellulose degradation represent an important renewable
(Beaton et al., 2019). Hemicellulose is source of energy. They play an
degraded into monomeric sugars and important role in the conversion of
acetic acid by: fungi like Aspergillus, organic waste to humus-like
Polyporus, Trichoderma reesei, and substances which improves soil
Phanerochaete chrysosporium; and structure and health, in a process
bacteria like Thermomonospora, called composting.
Actinomadura, Thermotoga, Bacillus,
Streptomyces, and Butyrivibrio b. Nitrogen Fixation
brisolvens (López-Mondéjar et al., Biological Nitrogen Fixation (BNF)
2016). Decomposition of soil chitin is is the xation of atmospheric
carried out by Streptomyces, nitrogen into ammonia. After
Nocardia, Trichoderma, and photosynthesis, nitrogen xation is
248 Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
the second most crucial process Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar
in uencing plant growth and trifolii nodulating in Trifolium
development. Only some prokaryotes, (clovers); R. leguminosarum biovar
known as diazotrophs, have the leguminosarum in peas and lentils; R.
ability to x stable atmospheric leguminosarum biovar phaseoli in
nitrogen into reactive nitrogen which beans; Sinorhizobium meliloti in
can be easily taken up by plants. Medicago and Melilotus;
These diazotrhophs are distributed in Bradyrhizobium japonicum, B. elkanii,
38 genera of bacteria, 2 genera of and B. liaonginense in soybean;
archaea and 20 genera of Mesorhizobium loti in Trefoil; M.
cyanobacteria (Harwani et al., 2009). ciceri in chickpeas; and stem
Hellriegel and Wilfarth (1886) for the nodulating Azorhizobium
rst time reported biological nitrogen caulinodans in Sesbania rostrata.
xation in the year 1886 and Moreover, Parasponia is the only non-
discovered that legumes bearing root legume that can establish nitrogen-
nodules could use gaseous nitrogen. xing symbiosis with Rhizobia (Behm
The BNF contributes around 110 and et al., 2014). Actinomycete Frankia
140 Tg per year of xed nitrogen on establishes nitrogen xing symbiosis
land and ocean, respectively (Pajares with actinorhizal plants such as Alder
and Ramos, 2019). Overall estimates (Alnus spp.), Sea buckthorn
suggest that, a total of 50-70 Tg (Hippophae rhamnoides) and
nitrogen is biologically xed annually Casuarina (Benson and Silvester,
in agricultural systems (Herridge et 1993). Anabaena-Azolla symbiosis is a
al., 2008). classic example where cyanobacteria
Anabaena azollae xes atmospheric
Microorganisms can x nitrogen as
nitrogen symbiotically with Azolla
free living organism, maintaining
(aquatic fern). In an earlier study,
association with grasses or by
Azospirillum spp. a nitrogen xing
establishing symbiotic relationship
endophytic bacteria was isolated from
with legumes, actinorhizal plants and
wheat which signi cantly enhanced
termites gut. Free living diazotrophs
the plant growth and biomass (Singh
include: Azotobacter, Beijerinckia,
et al., 2017b).
Bacillus, Clostridium, and Klebsiella;
and most nitrogen xing c. Phosphorus Solubilization and
cyanobacteria like Gloeothece, Mobilization
Cyanothece, Lyngbya, Trichodesmium,
Phosphorus (P) is one of the most
Katagnymene, Nostoc, Calothrix,
essential and limiting mineral
Tolypotkrix, Hassalia, and Gloeotrichia
nutrients after nitrogen. It is a
(Issa et al., 2014). Azospirillum spp.
component of nucleic acids, enzymes,
are able to form close associations
coenzymes, nucleotides, and
with several members of the grasses,
phospholipids. It constitutes about 0.2
including agriculturally important
- 0.8 per cent of plant's dry weight
cereal crops. Root legume symbiosis is
(Sharma et al., 2013). Availability of
the most effective nitrogen xing
phosphorus for plants is limited
process wherein Rhizobia x nitrogen
mainly because of the presence of P
in symbiotic association with legumes.
in insoluble form (about 95 to 99%).
Examples of Rhizobia include:
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies 249
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
(PGPR) are capable of solubilizing and solubilization (Richardson et al., 2009;
mineralizing insoluble soil Bhattacharyya and Jha, 2012; Singh et
phosphorus and thereby, enhances its al., 2018). Fungi involved in
availability for plant use (Alaylar et solubilization and mineralization of
al., 2019; Islam et al., 2019; Remy et phosphorus include strains of
al., 1994). Alternaria, Achrothcium, Aspergillus,
Phosphorus solubilization is a process Arthrobotrys, Curvularia,
wherein microorganisms convert Cephalosporium, Fusarium,
insoluble inorganic phosphorus into Chaetomium, Micromonospora,
plant available phosphorus. They Glomus, Oidiodendron, Mortierella,
solubilize P mainly by the production Phoma, Penicillium, Pichiafermentans,
of organic acids (citric acid, malic acid, Trichoderma, Rhizopus, Populospora,
oxalic acid, and gluconic acid), and Yarrowia (Alori et al., 2017).
inorganic acids and phosphatase Extensive utilization of phosphorus
enzymes (phosphor-mono-esterase, solubilizing microorganisms in
phosphor-di-esterase) (Hayat et al., agriculture is a promising strategy to
2010; Glick, 2012; Singh et al., 2018). enhance plant uptake and reduce the
On the other hand, phosphorus use of chemical fertilizers that have
mineralization refers to the negative impacts on the environment.
solubilization of organic phosphorus d. Potassium Solubilization
into plant available phosphorus
Potassium (K) is the third major
through microbial activity. Several
essential nutrient for plant growth
bacteria and fungi are reported to
after nitrogen and phosphorus. It
solubilize insoluble inorganic
plays vital role in protein synthesis,
phosphorus and mineralize insoluble
enzyme activity and photosynthesis
organic phosphorus in soil
(Hasanuzzaman et al., 2018).
ecosystems. Moreover, arbuscular
De ciency of K in soil results in
mycorrhizal symbiosis between soil
decreased crop yield and disease
fungi and approximately 80 per cent
resistance. Although the potassium
of all vascular plant species scavenge
reserves in the earth crust account for
phosphorus from soil and provide to
2.1 to 2.3 per cent, majority of it
root cortical cells while bypassing the
(about 90%) are insoluble silicate
direct uptake (Kobae, 2019).
minerals which are unavailable for
Phosphorus solubilization and plants use (Xiao et al., 2017). In soil, K
mineralization bacteria include is present as mineral K, non-
Agrobacterium spp., Azotobacter exchangeable K, exchangeable K, and
spp., Bacillus spp., Bradyrhizobium dissolved or solution K (K+ ions) forms;
spp., Pseudomonas spp., Beijerinckia, but plants have the ability to uptake
Arthrobacter spp., Burkholderia spp., only water-soluble and exchangeable
Enterobacter spp., Paenibacillus spp., forms.
Ralstonia spp., Rhizobium spp.,
Microorganisms such as bacteria,
Serratia spp., Sinomonas spp., and
fungi and actinomycetes have
Thiobacillus spp.; and Actinomycetes
remarkable ability to dissolve
mainly from the genus Actinomyces,
potassium from its mineral forms.
Micromonospora and Streptomyces
Similar to P solubilizing bacteria, K
are also involved in phosphorus
250 Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
solubilizing bacteria also produce various metabolically active
organic and inorganic acids which substances which regulate plant
solubilize potassium minerals either physiological and morphological
directly or indirectly by chelating properties. Auxins are produced by
mineral silicon ions to release K into Agrobacterium spp., Pseudomonas
solution. The prominent K solubilizing spp., Rhizobium spp., Bradyrhizobium
microbes include; Arthrobacter spp., spp., and Bacillus spp. GA was rst
Aminobacter spp., Acidithiobacillus reported in Rhizobium meliloti, and is
ferrooxidans, Bacillus mucilaginosus, also produced by Acetobacter
B. circulanscan, B. edaphicus, diazotrophicus, Bacillus spp., and
Enterobacter hormaechei, Pseudomonas spp. Cytokinin
Paenibacillus mucilaginosus, production is reported in
Aminobacter, Sphingomonas, Agrobacterium spp., Azotobacter
Burkholderia, Paenibacillus spp., Rhizobium spp., Pseudomonas
glucanolyticus, Aspergillus terreus, spp., Bacillus spp., Pantoea spp.,
Aspergillus niger, Cladosporium and Methylobacterium spp., and
Pencillium spp. (Shanware et al., Xanthomonas spp. ABA production is
2014). Rajawat et al. (2019a, 2019b, well documented in Bradyrhizobium
2020) also isolated K solubilizing japonicum and Azospirillum
bacteria from rhizosphere of different brasilense. Therefore, phytohormones
crops and screened for K of microbial origin provide abiotic
solubilization in different and biotic stress tolerance to plants
temperature ranges. The amount of K under changing environmental
solubilized by different isolates in conditions. The bacterial IAA plays an
liquid medium ranged from 10.6±0.92 important role in lateral roots
to 50.80±2.43 μg/mL. Use of K formation and increase in root length
solubilizing bacteria in wheat, and surface area, so that plants can
sorghum, maize, peanut, potato, pea, access more soil nutrients. Likewise,
and cotton resulted in improved plant rhizobacterial IAA relaxes plant cell
growth and yield (Meena et al., 2014). walls and therefore, stimulates root
Therefore, use of KSB as biofertilizer exudation that gives extra nutrients
in agriculture is a promising for the development of rhizospheric
alternative to synthetic K fertilizers. microbes (Glick, 2012). Inoculation of
IAA producing Providencia spp. and
e. Phytohormone Production
Alcaligenes spp. enhanced the plant
Phytohormones such as auxins, growth and yield of wheat
gibberellins (GA), cytokinins, and (Manjunath et al., 2011). Application
abscisic acid (ABA) regulate plant of Azotobacter spp., Anabaena spp. -
growth and development at various Providencia spp., and Anabaena spp. -
stages (Egamberdieva et al., 2017). Azotobacter spp. had signi cant
Microorganisms are also known to effect on root weight and yield of
produce these phytohormones to okra (Manjunath et al., 2016).
improve plant growth and enhance Gibberellins producing bacterial
tolerance to several abiotic stresses strains increase the shoot length (Jha
(Santner et al., 2009; Glick, 2014; and Saraf, 2015). Vacheron et al.
Vejan et al., 2016). Rhizobacteria (2013) found that a combination of
colonize the root surface and produce
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies 251
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
auxin and gibberellins can modulate inducing resistance or priming plants
the root design. Ruzzi and Aroca against pathogen infection by
(2015) found that cytokinin producing systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and
PGPR increases the permeability of induced systemic resistance (ISR),
cell membrane and therefore, change competing for limiting nutrients and
the root exudation pattern of plant directly killing the pathogen by
species. Xie et al. (2009) reported that hyperparasitism (Kohl et al., 2019).
the soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis
Different species of bacteria, fungi,
GB03 could enhance Fe acquisition of
yeast, and viruses act as BCAs. Some
Arabidopsis plants by activating the
popular examples include
Fe-de ciency-inducible responses,
Agrobactarium radiobacter strain 84,
suggesting that soil microorganisms
Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas
could regulate plant Fe acquisition via
uorescens, Streptomyces griseoviridi,
signalling processes.
Gliocladium spp., Metarrhizium
II.2 Biopesticides anisopliae, Ampelomyces quisqualis,
Beauvaria bassiana, Trichoderma spp.,
Indiscriminate application of Verticillum lecanii, Verticillium
chemical pesticides to tackle plant chlamydosporium, Chaetomium
diseases has affected the soil health, globosum, Burkholderia cepacia, VAM
besides causing deleterious effect on fungi, and Nuclear Polyhedrosis
non-target organisms and the Viruses (NPV) (Singh, 2014). Fungicide
environment. Microbial pesticides are compatible biocontrol agent
promising options to avoid the Trichoderma asperellum effectively
deleterious effects of chemical inhibited the mycelia growth of
pesticides and are gaining importance Sclerotium rolfsii Sr3, Pythium
among the farmers and researchers. aphanidermatum, Sclerotium rolfsii
Biocontrol is de ned as the Sr1 and P. debaryanum by 54.87,
application of a living organism to 43.57, 42.56 and 38.16 per cent,
control other plant detrimental respectively (Manjunath et al., 2017).
organisms (Sporleder and Lacey, Biopesticides have the potential for
2013). Microorganisms having the development of integrated pest
potential for disease suppression are management strategies.
referred to as the microbial biological
control agents (BCA) which includes II.3 Bioremediation
most likely bacteria (Pseudomonas
Bioremediation is a
spp. and Bacillus spp.) and fungi
transformation or degradation of
(Trichoderma spp. and Gliocladium
contaminants into non-hazardous or
spp.). These biocontrol agents provide
less-hazardous substances by
low-cost, environmental-friendly and
microorganisms and plants. Synthetic
sustainable alternative for hazardous
chemicals like industrial solvents,
synthetic chemical pesticides used in
agricultural pesticides, poisons, and
agriculture. Microbial biological
heavy metals are recalcitrant in
control agents provide plant
nature and cause environmental
protection by producing
pollution. Microorganisms carry out
allelochemicals such as antibiotics,
bioremediation by producing various
biocidal volatiles and siderophores,
enzymes like mono-oxygenase, di-
252 Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
oxygenases, laccases, peroxidases, and and future generations. Microbes are
hydrolytic enzymes that attack the the major component of biological
pollutants and convert them into diversity and are crucial for sustaining
nonhazardous substances (Karigar environmental quality. They play
and Rao, 2011). main role in regulation of
biogeochemical cycles, soil formation
Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas
and climate regulation (Byarugaba,
spp., Ralstonia spp., Microbacterium
2004). Organic matter decomposition
spp., Alcaligenes odorans, Bacillus
and regulation of essential elements
subtilis, Corynebacterium
have been the key components that
propinquum, Aspergillus niger, A.
involve microbial activity which in
fumigatus, and Penicillium
turn, are vital for the maintenance of
chrysogenum are reported in
soil fertility and structure. Improving
bioremediation of monocyclic
the organic matter content is very
aromatic hydrocarbons, e.g. benzene
critical to sustain rainfed
and xylene (Singh and Fulekar, 2009;
agroecosystems. Incorporation of
Wolicka et al., 2009; Di Martino et al.,
fresh horse gram biomass at 3.03-4.28
2012). Bacillus cereus strain XMCr-6,
t/ha/year for 10 years signi cantly
Pseudomonas putida, Enterobacter
improved the soil fertility. It had
cloacae B2-DHA, Bacillus subtilis,
improved microbial biomass carbon
Gloeophyllum sepiarium and
and organic carbon by 28 and 24 per
Rhizopus oryzae can carry out
cent, respectively. There was also an
bioremediation of chromium, while
increase in grain yield of sun ower
Sporosarcina ginsengisoli is reported
and sorghum by 18 and 28 per cent,
for arsenic, Pseudomonas veronii and
respectively (Venkateswarlu et al.,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae for
2007). The microbial extracellular
cadmium, Aspergillus fumigates for
polysaccharide has been reported to
lead, and Aspergillus versicolor for
restore the soil structure by acting as
nickel bioremediation. In pesticides
cementing material and thus,
bioremediation, Bacillus and
reducing the soil erosion (Costa et al.,
Staphylococcus are reported for
2018). In earlier studies,
endosulfan, Enterobacter spp.,
exopolysaccharide (EPS) producing
Chlorpyrifos spp., Acenetobactor spp.,
Pseudomonas spp. and rhizobacteria viz., Bacillus cereus,
Photobacterium spp. for methyl Microbacterium resistens and
parathion, and Phanerochaete Pseudomonas sp. were isolated and
chrysosporium for biphenyl and evaluated for moisture stress
triphenyl methane bioremediation alleviation. These EPS producing
(Abatenh et al., 2017). bacteria signi cantly increased the
water stable aggregates, mean
II.4 Preservation of Natural weight diameter and root adhering
Resources and Environment soil (Singh et al., 2014, 2015a, 2015b,
2015c). The microbes also act as sink
Natural resources include land, and source of several nutrients
soil, water, plants, and animals. required for plant growth.
Preservation or management of
natural resources is important for
keeping the quality of life for current
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies 253
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
belonging to the class Beta-
III. Microbial Contribution proteobacteria (Teske et al., 1994). In
to Climate Change contrast, denitri cation is a multistep
process in which each step is
Microorganisms act as both mediated by a speci c group of
source and sink of greenhouse gases microorganisms having the enzymes
(GHGs) (Kolb and Horn, 2012). They necessary to catalyze a particular step
are vital components of C-N cycle in (Arrigo and Kevin, 2005). The
soil. Through various biochemical production of N2O is typically the
processes such as decomposition and result of incomplete denitri cation
heterotrophic respiration, they (Conthe et al., 2019). Nitri cation is
release GHGs viz., carbon dioxide the main source of N2O under aerobic
(CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous conditions, while denitri cation
oxide (N2O) into the atmosphere. dominates in anoxic environment.
Methanogens produce methane in Anaerobic ammonium oxidation
natural and arti cial anaerobic (ANAMMOX) is an alternate
environments, mainly sediments, microbial-mediated pathway
water-saturated soils such as paddy responsible for nitrogen loss in the
elds, gastrointestinal tracts of form of N2 and N2O in aquatic system
animals (particularly ruminants), (Dalsgaard et al., 2005).
wastewater facilities, and biogas
facilities. It is carried out by a group
of anaerobic archaea in wetlands,
IV. Effect of Climate
oceans, rumens and termite guts, in Change on Microbes
addition to the anthropogenic
methane production (Cappenberg, Variations in the climatic
1974; Gambrell and Patrick, 1978; conditions in uence the diversity and
Jakobsen et al.,1981; Loveley and structure of various microbial
Phillips, 1987; De Groot et al.,1994; communities (Castro et al., 2010;
Kolb and Horn, 2012). Global Brockett et al., 2012; Kembel et al.,
emissions of CH4 are possibly even 2012). Microbial community
more directly controlled by composition, abundance and function
microorganisms than emissions of CO2 are altered when microbes are
(IPCC, 2007). exposed to new extremes in
environmental condition. Moreover,
Similar to global CO2 and CH4 signi cant changes also happen over
emissions, microbial nitri cation and time in their functional genes and
denitri cation processes release N2O traits. This kind of effect happens
(IPCC, 2007). It has been reported over each biogeochemical cycle (Sayer
that, for every ton of nitrogen et al., 2017). The main direct effects
deposited on the earth's surface, of climate change on soil
either naturally or arti cially as microorganisms are likely to be
fertilizer, 10-50 kg N2O is released caused by changes in temperature
(Crutzen et al., 2016). Most of the N2O and moisture content. These factors
is produced by nitri cation as a result can affect processes such as
of the activity of autotrophic greenhouse gas ux in two ways: by
ammonia (NH3)-oxidizing bacteria modifying the physiology of existing
254 Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
microbial populations and/or by diminish their biomass, which will
changing the structure of the subsequently reduce primary
microbial community. For example, at production and CO2 uptake
higher temperatures, most (Behrenfeld et al., 2013). Climate
microorganisms grow and use change facilitates a shift in microbial-
substrates at faster rates, so that the community structure, the process
rate at which processes such as rates and the mechanism of control
respiration occur may change; might change, because the new
however, the control mechanism microbial community will have
remains the same (von Lutzow and different physiologies (Schimel and
Kogel-Knabner, 2009; Conant et al., Gulledge, 1998).
2011). Temperature directly affects
enzyme activity and microbial V. Role of Microbes in
physiological property. Soil microbial
diversity plays an important role for Climate Smart
different ecosystem functions and can Agriculture
in uence plant diversity through the
cycling of various nutrients in nature Effect of climate change on
(Delgado-Baquerizo and Singh, 2016). agriculture is evident now. The rising
The direct effect of climate change is temperature, elevated CO2,
rising temperature whereas, indirectly unseasonal rainfall, ood, cyclone,
it can affect the plant composition, and drought have led to the idea of
root exudate pattern or even litter climate smart agriculture (CSA) so as
decomposition (Singh et al., 2010). to make agriculture more resilient to
changing climatic conditions.
The effects of increased CO2 levels on
Economically improving pro ciency,
microbial communities are often
adjustment to and relief of
indirect, as they are mediated by
environmental change are three
cascading effects on plant
mainstays of CSA (Lipper et al., 2014;
metabolism, growth and diversity,
Paustian et al., 2016). Microorganisms
and the associated changes in soil
are indispensable to various biological
physicochemical properties such as
activities in agro-ecosystems.
soil moisture and resource quality
Application of bene cial
(carbon to nitrogen ratio) (Bardgett
microorganisms such as biofertilizers
and Wardle, 2010). Global climate
and biopesticides besides improving
change could increase the
soil health and productivity, they also
heterotrophic microbial activity,
help in reducing the use of
which will ultimately increase the net
agrochemicals which in turn, may
carbon ef ux into the atmosphere as
help to decrease the use of fossil fuels
the rate of soil respiration is
in manufacturing agrochemicals and
extremely sensitive to increase in
subsequent release of GHGs into the
temperature (Bardgett et al., 2008).
atmosphere (Wagg et al., 2014). They
Diatoms perform 25-45 per cent of play crucial role in plant nutrient
total primary production in the cycling. They are both source and
oceans (Malviya et al., 2016). sink of carbon dioxide, methane and
Anthropogenic climate change will nitrous oxide (Kolb and Horn, 2012).
directly affect timing of blooms and
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies 255
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
Methanotrophic bacteria serve as a 2007). The huge diversity of microbes
critical buffer to the huge amounts of gives an opportunity to explore and
CH4. The enzyme N2O reductase in exploit them for improving
rhizobacteria (in root nodules) and pro ciency of crop production,
other soil microorganisms can also adjusting to and alleviating
convert N2O to N2 (not a greenhouse environmental change impacts to soil
gas) (Sameshima-Saito et al., 2006; and plant health. Climate resilient
Zumft and Kroneck, 2006; Thomson et village (CRV) modules have been
al., 2012). Plant associated developed in the National
microorganisms help to improve Innovations in Climate Resilient
adaptation of crops to climate change Agriculture (NICRA) project to
by imparting resistance to biotic and manage the climate vulnerabilities at
abiotic stresses. Novel biocontrol village level to improve crop
agents can be utilized to contain the productivity and livelihood of farmers
destructive effect of emerging insect- and also to mitigate GHG emissions
pests under changing climatic (Srinivasarao et al., 2016). Microbial
conditions. Joshi et al. (2010) reported based technologies can be integrated
that Neozygites fresenii and into CRV modules to reap more
Maravalia cryptostegiae had been bene ts. Overall, microorganisms play
used to control of cotton aphid Aphis important role in climate smart
gossypii and weed rubber vine, agriculture through climate change
respectively. adaptation, GHG mitigation, and soil
carbon storage (Mohanty and Swain,
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) has been
2018; Das et al., 2019).
commercialized to control of
Lepidoptera and Diptera larvae. Bt V.1 Climate Change or Greenhouse
produces crystalline like pro-toxin,
Gas (GHG) Mitigation
which enters inside the mid gut of
larvae through feeding of plant Soil microorganisms through
leaves. Proteolysis occurs inside the their metabolic activities affect soil-air
alkaline mid gut of larvae and carbon exchanges. Methanotrophs
produces toxic peptides, consequently are speci c group of microorganisms
rupturing of epithelial cell of larvae which oxidize methane or other C1
causing the death of larvae (Estela et carbon compounds like formate,
al., 2004; Roh et al., 2007). methyl amine, dimethyl amine,
Bioaugmentation and biostimulation methanol to carbon dioxide and
are the two basic principles of release it to the environment (Kolb
biological control of soil-borne and Stacheter, 2013). Methanotrophs
phytopathogens, which can help to represent about~5 per cent of the
enhance adaptation to climate worldwide sink of atmospheric CH4
change. Recently identi ed Rhizobia (Hanson and Hanson, 1996) whereas,
species related with Medicago sativa it is up to 90 per cent for CH4 in the
can possibly work under different soil (Oremland, 1992). Many strains of
abiotic conditions, for example, low methylotrophic microbes are being
or high temperature, pH or low used for plant growth promotion
degrees of organic matter in the soil (Yim et al., 2012; Agafonova et al.,
(Ahmad et al., 1997; Bertrand et al., 2013; Jeyajothi et al., 2014). A
256 Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
recently discovered methanotrophic increase the soil biodiversity (Malik et
bacteria- Methylokorus infernorum al., 2017; Singh et al., 2019).
can utilize CH4 gas about 11 kg per Expanded biodiversity gives expanded
year. Another bacteria biological system exibility, which can
Methylobacterium extorquens also support and settle environmental
consumes many C1 carbon change impacts. Microorganisms
compounds like methane, methanol increase the ecosystem stability, and
and methylated amines and converts likewise can assume a key role in
them into CO2 (Jhala et al., 2014) and climate change buffering. For
make it available for autotrophic instance, bio-control agents can settle
microbes (Large, 1983). Zuniga et al. population levels of plants and
(2011) found that Methylobacterium herbivores, making them stronger to
organophilum CZ, Methylobacterium environmental change (Hoover and
organophilum CZ‐2 and Methylosinus Newman, 2004).
trichosporium OB3b transformed
Microorganisms have immense
methane gas into poly-β-
potential in synthesizing bioethanol,
hydroxybutyrate with limited CO2 biodiesel and methane utilizing
emission. Thus, renewable raw materials such as
methanotrophs/methylotrophs play molasses, cellulose, and other
the signi cant role in mitigation of biomass. The Saccharomyces
GHG emission. cerevisiae is being used to convert
Some denitrifying microorganisms are molasses and cellulose to bioethanol.
known to change nitrous oxide into Similarly, Green algae are used to
nitrogen gas (Itakura et al., 2013; produce biodiesel by utilizing sunlight
Nishizawa et al., 2014; Akiyama et al., (Scott et al., 2010; Krohn et al., 2011;
2016; Gao et al., 2016). Nishizawa et Patil et al., 2011; Pfromm et al., 2011).
al. (2014) reported that inoculation of Upscaling of its production and
pelleted poultry manure with utilization will go a long way in
Burkholderia spp., Azoarcus and drastically reducing the use of fossil
Niastella and their application as fuels and GHG emissions by way of
biofertilizers signi cantly decreased manufacturing of petroleum
the N2O emission by 40-60 per cent as products, power generation, etc.
compared to control. Gao et al. (2016)
also reported that in a greenhouse V.2 Soil Carbon Storage
study, association of Azospirillum and Soil health and crop productivity
Herbaspirillum with red clover are largely dependent on soil organic
signi cantly decreased the N2O carbon. Degraded soils, long periods
emissions. These organisms can of drought, low soil organic carbon
possibly alleviate GHG emissions. content, and low productivity are
Around the world, an expected 70- important characteristics of dryland
140 million tons of nitrogen are xed agroecosystems. Soil organic carbon
by nitrogen xing microbes content of Indian soils is very low, and
(Brockwell et al., 1995). Soil it follows in the following decreasing
microorganisms decrease the order: Vertisols > Inceptisols > Al sols
utilization of agrochemicals which are > Aridisols. These soils have potential
responsible for climate change and to sequester carbon provided that
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies 257
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
there are suitable crop productions carbon in SOM and also discharging
and management practices. carbon as CO2 from the degradation
Enhancing the soil organic matter of SOM. Climate change modi es soil
content is an important strategy to carbon stockpiling through organic
improve soil health and crop matter decomposition or
productivity. To achieve this, the role mineralization, altering the
of soil microorganisms is very aggregation and accumulation of soil
important for SOM decomposition organic matter, and affecting soil
and nutrient cycling (Srinivasarao et erosion and respiration (Song et al.,
al., 2009; Srinivasarao et al., 2013). 2012; Brevik, 2013).
Microorganisms can have a crucial Soil microorganisms are imperative in
role in alleviating climate change. For the carbon cycle, assuming a crucial
instance, agriculture itself brings role in the sequestration of carbon in
about environmental change, soil organic matter (SOM) and
indirectly by way of using petroleum furthermore, the release of carbon as
products and land use, and directly carbon dioxide (CO2) from the
through GHGs emergence from degradation of SOM. Soil
farming practices. Greenhouse gas microorganisms assume a vital role in
out ows are particularly identi ed the carbon stabilization process by
with methane discharges from changing the dead organic matter
ruminant domesticated animals and into simple carbon molecules that are
rice eld in addition to nitrous oxide bound to be ensured and sequestered
discharges from fertilizers application, (Six et al., 2006). At each point on this
which represents 80 per cent of decay pathway, various kinds of
overall nitrous oxide emanations. carbon of contrasting size and
Expanded land use for agriculture synthetic intricacy are created that
brings about CO2 emissions connected can be incorporated with sediment
to deforestation and because of the and soil particles or fused into soil
expanded utilization of soil. It aggregates (Six et al., 2006; Grandy
additionally prompts enhanced CO2 and Wickings, 2010).
concentration in the atmosphere
Fungi assume a signi cant role in soil
because of decreased carbon re-take-
carbon stabilization or sequestration
up, and increased greenhouse gas
by amplifying the amount of carbon
discharge. The carbon sink limit of the
assigned to the soil and delivering
soil, which is interceded by
exacerbates that improve soil
microorganisms, has signi cant
aggregates stability. Arbuscular
rami cations for climatic change. Soil
Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) show
is both source and sink of global
symbiotic relationship with plant
carbon. It is the second largest
roots by giving plants soil
reservoir of carbon followed by
supplements while plants giving AMF
atmosphere which is more dynamic
basic sugars (Govindarajulu et al.,
(Baldini et al., 2018). Accumulation of
2005). As plants feed AMF, their
carbon in soil is a major approach for
biomass enhances by adequately
climate change alleviation (Schils,
expanding the amount of carbon in
2008). One of the signi cant roles of
soil (Rillig et al., 2001). Besides, AMF
soil microbes is sequestration of
also produce a sticky protein called
258 Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
glomalin that holds the soil particles control various pests and diseases. In
together, helping to conserve soil both ways, they reduce the
carbon (Rillig, 2004). Wilson et al. overexploitation of fertilizers and
(2009) reported that AMF are pesticides which are detrimental to
positively correlated with soil both soil and the environment. The
aggregation and carbon PGPR (Plant Growth Promoting
sequestration. Besides soil fungi, soil Rhizobacteria) forms an attractive
bacteria also assume a signi cant role group of bene cial micro- ora which
in organic matter decomposition. is being used worldwide and are
Nitrifying microorganisms convert gaining acceptance in climate stressed
complex nitrogen mixes from dead agriculture management or in
organic matter into simple forms that restoring degraded lands. The
are easily accessible for plants, while application of such microorganisms
Actinomycetes are liable for the not only helps in improving the soil
disintegration of more complex health, but also improves the plant
organic substrate (lignin, cellulose or growth through production of
hydrocarbon). These degradation various metabolites under different
processes are fundamental for stress conditions. It also becomes
microbial biomass creation and imperative to develop a
carbon sequestration into stable comprehensive knowledge of microbe
structures in soil. Overseeing soils for mediated reduction of greenhouse
soil microorganisms by giving gas emissions and the interaction
adequate and different plant inputs between different biotic and abiotic
and by decreasing tillage can improve components regulating it. This will
the carbon sequestration (Six et al., ultimately help in enhancing the
2006). predictions of various feedback
responses of microbes to climate
VI. Future Prospects and change, that can be incorporated into
future models of terrestrial feedback
Challenges loop and climate change. Novel
With the changing climatic biofertilizer strains could be
conditions, there have been changing developed having multifarious role in
rainfall patterns, rising average mean improving crop productivity and soil
temperature along with increasing health that can be better suited
incidence of extreme climatic events under changing environmental
like oods, droughts, and cyclone conditions. Crop yields could also be
which are directly affecting improved by developing new
agriculture. Therefore, it becomes strategies based on a better
extremely important to transform and understanding of various plant-
reorient agriculture making it more microbe and microbe-microbe
resilient to climate change. interactions. These crops could work
Microorganisms form an important well under different climatic
component of sustainable agriculture conditions and are economically
system where they can be used as viable to the farmers. Microorganisms
biofertilizers to promote plant may be out of sight, but we cannot
growth, or as biocontrol agents to afford for them to be out of mind.
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies 259
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
and PCBs”. International
VII. Conclusion biodeterioration and biodegradation
Climate change, with increment 39(1):33-43.
of mean temperature, changing Akiyama, H., Hoshino, Y.T., Itakura, M.,
pattern of rainfall and expanding Shimomura, Y., Wang, Y., Yamamoto,
recurrence of outrageous climatic A., Tago, K., Nakajima, Y., Minamisawa,
occasions like cyclone, dry spell and K. and Hayatsu, M. 2016. “Mitigation
ood is affecting agriculture. It is of soil N2O emission by inoculation with
most important to reorient and a mixed culture of indigenous
change agriculture to make it Bradyrhizobium diazoef ciens”.
stronger to environmental changes. Scienti c reports 6:32869.
Appropriate management and
utilization of microbial formulation Alaylar, B., Güllüce, M., Karadayi, M.
such as, biofertilizer, biopesticides and and Isaoglu, M. 2019. “Rapid Detection
plant growth promoting of Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria
rhizobacteria could contribute to from Agricultural Areas in Erzurum”.
both climate change adaptation and Current microbiology 76(7):804-809.
mitigation. Climate change in uences Alori, E.T., Bernard, R., Glick. and
growth and development of crop Babalola, O.O. 2017. “Microbial
plants as well as development and phosphorus solubilization and its
movement of microorganisms in the potential for use in sustainable
rhizosphere. A proper understanding agriculture”. Frontiers in microbiology
of microbial ecology and soil-plant- 8:971.
microbe interaction in a changing
climatic scenario is essential to use Arrigo. and Kevin, R. 2005. “Marine
microbial technology for climate microorganisms and global nutrient
change adaptation and mitigation. cycles”. Nature 437(7057):349-355.
Baldini, J.U.L., Bertram, R.A. and Ridley,
VIII. References H.E. 2018. “Ground air: A rst
approximation of the Earth's second
Abatenh, E., Gizaw, B., Tsegaye, Z. and largest reservoir of carbon dioxide
Wassie, M. 2017. “Application of gas”. Science of the Total Environment
microorganisms in bioremediation”. - 616:1007-1013.
Review. Journal of Environmental
Microbiology 1(1):2-9. Bardgett, R.D., Freeman, C. and Ostle,
N.J. 2008. “Microbial contributions to
Agafonova, N.V., Kaparullina, E.N., climate change through carbon cycle
Doronina, N.V. and Trotsenko, Y.A. feedbacks”. The ISME journal 2(8):805-
2013. “Phosphate-solubilizing activity 814.
of aerobic methylobacteria”.
Microbiology 82(6):864-867. Bardgett, R.D. and Wardle, D.A. 2010.
“Aboveground-belowground
Ahmad, D., Mehmannavaz, R. and linkages: biotic interactions, ecosystem
Damaj, M. 1997. “Isolation and processes, and global change”. Oxford
characterization of symbiotic N2- xing University Press.
Rhizobium meliloti from soils
contaminated with aromatic and Bargaz, A., Lyamlouli, K., Chtouki, M.,
chloroaromatic hydrocarbons: PAHs Zeroual, Y. and Dhiba, D. 2018. “Soil
260 Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
microbial resources for improving properties and processes and
fertilizers ef ciency in an integrated corresponding in uence on food
plant nutrient management system”. security”. Agriculture 3(3):398-417.
Frontiers in microbiology 9:1606.
Brockett, B.F., Prescott, C.E. and
Beaton, D., Pelletier, P. and Goulet, R.R. Grayston, S.J. 2012. “Soil moisture is
2019. “Microbial Degradation of the major factor in uencing microbial
Cellulosic Material and Gas community structure and enzyme
Generation: Implications for the activities across seven biogeoclimatic
Management of Low-and zones in western Canada”. Soil Biology
Intermediate-Level Radioactive and Biochemistry 44(1):9-20.
Waste”. Frontiers in microbiology
Brockwell, J., Bottomley, P.J. and Thies,
10:204.
J.E. 1995. “Manipulation of rhizobia
Behm, J.E., Geurts, R. and Kiers, T.E. micro ora for improving legume
2014. “Parasponia: a novel system for productivity and soil fertility: a critical
studying mutualism stability”. Trends assessment”. Plant and Soil 174(1-
in plant science 19(12):757-763. 2):143-180.
Behrenfeld, M.J., Doney, S.C., Lima, I., Byarugaba, D.K. 2004. “Harnessing
Boss, E.S. and Siegel, D.A. 2013. microbial resources for increased
“Annual cycles of ecological agricultural productivity and improved
disturbance and recovery underlying livelihoods”. Uganda Journal of
the subarctic Atlantic spring plankton Agricultural Sciences 9(1):227-234.
bloom”. Global biogeochemical cycles
Cappenberg, T.E. 1974. “Interrelations
279(2):526-540.
between sulfate-reducing and
Benson, D.R. and Silvester, W.B. 1993. methane-producing bacteria in
“Biology of Frankia strains, bottom deposits of a fresh-water
actinomycete symbionts of lake”. I. Field observations. Antonie
actinorhizal plants”. Microbiology and van Leeuwenhoek 40(2):285-295.
Molecular Biology Reviews 57(2): 293-
Castro, H.F., Classen, A.T., Austin, E.E.,
319.
Norby, R.J. and Schadt, C.W. 2010. “Soil
Bertrand, A., Prévost, D., Bigras, F.J. and microbial community responses to
Castonguay, Y. 2007. “Elevated multiple experimental climate change
atmospheric CO2 and strain of drivers”. Applied and Environmental
rhizobium alter freezing tolerance and Microbiology 76(4):999-1007.
cold-induced molecular changes in
Conant, R.T., Ryan, M.G., Ågren, G.I.,
alfalfa (Medicago sativa)”. Annals of
Birge, H.E., Davidson, E.A., Eliasson,
botany 99(2):275-284.
P.E., Evans, S.E., Frey, S.D., Giardina,
Bhattacharyya, P.N. and Jha, D.K. 2012. C.P., Hopkins, F.M. and Hyvönen, R.
“Plant growth-promoting 2011. “Temperature and soil organic
rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in matter decomposition rates–synthesis
a g r i c u l t u r e ” . Wo r l d J o u r n a l o f of current knowledge and a way
Microbiology and Biotechnology forward”. Global Change Biology
28(4):1327-1350. 17(11):3392-3404.
Brevik, E.C. 2013. “The potential Conthe, M., Lycus, P., Arntzen, M.O., da
impact of climate change on soil Silva, A.R., Frostegård, Å., Bakken, L.R.,
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies 261
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
Kleerebezem, R. and Van Loosdrecht, Di Martino, Carla, López, N.I. and
M.C. 2019. “Denitri cation as an N2O Raiger Iustman, L.J. 2012. “Isolation
sink”. Water research 151:381-387. and characterization of benzene,
toluene and xylene degrading
Costa, O.Y.A., Raaijmakers, J.M. and
Pseudomonas sp. selected as
Kuramae, E.E. 2018. “Microbial
candidates for bioremediation”.
extracellular polymeric substances:
International biodeterioration and
ecological function and impact on soil
biodegradation 67:15-20.
aggregation”. Frontiers in
microbiology 9:1636. Egamberdieva, D., Wirth, S.J.,
Alqarawi, A.A., Abdullah, E.F. and
Crutzen, P.J., Mosier, A.R., Smith, K.A.
Hashem, A. 2017. “Phytohormones and
and Winiwarter, W. 2016. “N2O release
bene cial microbes: essential
from agro-biofuel production negates
components for plants to balance
global warming reduction by replacing
stress and tness”. Frontiers in
fossil fuels”. In Paul Jozef Crutzen: A
microbiology 8:2104.
pioneer on atmospheric chemistry and
climate change in the anthropocene Enete, A.A. and Amusa, T.A. 2010.
Springer, Cham: 227-238. “Challenges of agricultural adaptation
to climate change in Nigeria: A
Dalsgaard, T., Thamdrup, B. and
synthesis from the literature”. Field
Can eld, D.E. 2005. “Anaerobic
Actions Science Reports. The Journal of
ammonium oxidation (anammox) in
F i e l d A c t i o n s 4 .
the marine environment”. Research in
[Link]
microbiology 156(4):457-464.
factsreports/678.
Das, S., Adrian, H. and Kim, P.J. 2019.
Estela, A., Escriche, B. and Ferré, J.
“Role of Microbes in Climate-Smart
2004. “Interaction of Bacillus
Agriculture”. Frontiers in Microbiology
thuringiensis toxins with larval mid gut
10:2756.
binding sites of Helicoverpa armigera
Dashtban, M., Schraft, H., Syed, T.A. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)”. Applied
a n d Q i n , W. 2 0 1 0 . “ F u n g a l and Environmental Microbiology
biodegradation and enzymatic 70(3):1378-1384.
modi cation of lignin”. International
Fu, L., Penton, C.R., Ruan, Y., Shen, Z.,
journal of biochemistry and molecular
Xue, C., Li, R. and Shen, Q. 2017.
biology 1(1):36.
“Inducing the rhizosphere microbiome
De Groot, C.J., Vermoesen, A. and by biofertilizer application to suppress
Cleemput, O.V. 1994. “Laboratory banana Fusarium wilt disease”. Soil
study of the emission of N2O and CH4 Biology and Biochemistry 104:39-48.
from a calcareous soil”. Soil Science
G a m b r e l l . a n d R o b e r t , P. 1 9 7 8 .
158(5):355-364.
“Chemical and microbiological
Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Maestre, F.T., properties of anaerobic soils and
Reich, P.B., Jeffries, T.C., Gaitan, J.J., sediments”. In D.D. Hook and R.M.M.
Encinar, D., Berdugo, M., Campbell, Crawford (eds), Plant Life in Anaerobic
C.D. and Singh, B.K. 2016. “Microbial Environment, Ann Arbor Science
diversity drives multifunctionality in Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI, 375–423.
terrestrial ecosystems”. Nature
communications 7:10541.
262 Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
Gao, N., Shen, W., Kakuta, H., Tanaka, review”. Biotechnology for
N., Fujiwara, T., Nishizawa, T., Takaya, agricultural microorganisms–An Agro-
N., Nagamine, T., Isobe, K., Otsuka, S. Industry Approach, IK International
and Senoo, K. 2016. “Inoculation with Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, India: 406-435.
nitrous oxide (N2O)-reducing
Hasanuzzaman, M., Bhuyan, M.H.M.,
denitri er strains simultaneously
Nahar, K., Hossain, M., Mahmud, J.A.,
mitigates N2O emission from pasture
Hossen, M. and Fujita, M. 2018.
soil and promotes growth of pasture
“Potassium: a vital regulator of plant
plants”. Soil Biology and Biochemistry
responses and tolerance to abiotic
97: 83-91.
stresses”. Agronomy 8(3):31.
Gaur, R., Shani, N., Kawaljeet, Johri,
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R.
B.N., Rossi, P. and Aragno, M. 2004.
and Ahmed, I. 2010. “Soil bene cial
“Diacetylphloroglucinol-producing
bacteria and their role in plant growth
pseudomonads do not in uence AM
promotion: a review.” Annals of
fungi in wheat rhizosphere”. Current
Microbiology 60 (4):579-598.
Science 86:453-457.
Herridge, D.F., Peoples, M.B. and
Glick, R. 2014. “Bacteria with ACC
Boddey, R.M. 2008. “Global inputs of
deaminase can promote plant growth
biological nitrogen xation in
and help to feed the world”.
agricultural systems”. Plant and Soil
Microbiological research 169(1):30-39.
311(1-2):1-18.
Glick, R. 2012. “Plant growth-
Hellriegel, H. and Willfarth, H. 1886.
promoting bacteria: mechanisms and
“Untersuchungen über die
applications”. Scienti ca
Stickstoffnharung der Gramineren und
[Link]
L e g u m i n o s e n ” . B e i l a g e Z Ve r s
Govindarajulu, M., Pfeffer, P.E., Jin, H., Rubenzuckerind 1(12):234.
Abubaker, J., Douds, D.D., Allen, J.W.,
Hoover, J.K. and Newman, J.A. 2004.
Bücking, H., Lammers, P.J. and Shachar-
“Tritrophic interactions in the context
Hill, Y. 2005. “Nitrogen transfer in the
of climate change: a model of grasses,
arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis”.
cereal aphids and their parasitoids”.
Nature 435(7043):819-823.
Global Change Biology 10(7):1197-
Grandy, A.S. and Wickings, K. 2010. 1208.
“Biological and biochemical pathways
IPCC. 2007. “Climate Change: The
of litter decomposition and soil carbon
physical science basis. Contribution of
stabilization”. Geochimica et
working group I to the fourth
cosmochimica acta 74(12):A351-A351.
assessment report of the
Hanson, R.S. and Hanson, T.E. 1996. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
“Methanotrophic bacteria”. Change”. Cambridge University Press,
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Cambridge, United Kingdom and New
Reviews 60(2):439-471. York, NY, USA 996.
Harwani, D., Choudhary, P., Dhaker, S., IPCC. 2013. “Climate Change: The
Prasad, K. and Mahna, S.K. 2009. physical science basis. Contribution of
“Tripartite symbiotic association: working group I to the fth assessment
legume-rhizobia-mycorrhiza. - a report of the intergovernmental panel
on climate change”: 1535.
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies 263
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
Islam, M.K., Sano, A., Majumder, M.S.I., Joshi, S., Rabindra, R.J. and Rajendran,
Hossain, M.A. and Sakagami, J.I. 2019. T.P. 2010. “Biological control of
“Isolation and molecular aphids”. Journal of Biological Control
characterization of phosphate 24:185-202.
solubilizing lamentous fungi from
Karigar, C.S. and Rao, S.S. 2011. “Role
subtropical soils in Okinawa”. Applied
of microbial enzymes in the
Ecology and Environmental Research
bioremediation of pollutants: a
17(4):9145-9157.
review”. Enzyme research
Issa, A.A., Abd-Alla, M.H. and Ohyama, [Link]
T. 2 0 1 4 . “ N i t r o g e n xing
Kembel, S.W., Jones, E., Kline, J.,
cyanobacteria: future prospect”.
Northcutt, D., Stenson, J., Womack,
Advances in biology and ecology of
A.M., Bohannan, B.J., Brown, G.Z. and
nitrogen xation 2:23.
Green, J.L. 2012. “Architectural design
Itakura, M., Uchida, Y., Akiyama, H., in uences the diversity and structure
H o s h i n o , Y. T. , S h i m o m u r a , Y. , of the built environment microbiome”.
Morimoto, S., Tago, K., Wang, Y., The ISME journal 6(8):1469-1479.
Hayakawa, C., Uetake, Y. and Sánchez,
Kobae, Y. 2019. “Dynamic phosphate
C. 2013. “Mitigation of nitrous oxide
uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots
emissions from soils by Bradyrhizobium
under eld conditions”. Frontiers in
japonicum inoculation”. Nature
Environmental Science 6:159.
Climate Change 3(3):208-212.
Köhl, J., Kolnaar, R. and Ravensberg,
Jakobsen, P., Patrick, Jr.W.H. and
W. J . 2 0 1 9 . “ M o d e o f a c t i o n o f
Williams, B.G. 1981. “Sul de and
microbial biological control agents
methane formation in soils and
against plant diseases: relevance
sediments”. Soil Science 132(4):279-
beyond ef cacy”. Frontiers in plant
287.
science 10:845.
Jeyajothi, R., Subbalakshmi, L. and
Kolb, S. and Horn, M.A. 2012.
Nalliah, D. 2014. “Effect of PPFM
“Microbial CH4 and N2O consumption
application on microbial population in
in acidic wetlands”. Frontiers in
t r a n s p l a n t e d r i c e ” . Tr e n d s i n
microbiology 3:78.
Biosciences 7(22):3573-3574.
Kolb, S.P.D. and Stacheter, A. 2013.
Jha, C.K. and Saraf, M. 2015. “Plant
“Prerequisites for amplicon
growth promoting rhizobacteria
pyrosequencing of microbial methanol
(PGPR): a review”. Journal of
utilizers in the environment”. Frontiers
Agricultural Research and
in microbiology 4:268.
Development 5(2):108-119.
Krohn, B.J., McNeff, C.V., Yan, B. and
Jhala, Y.K., Vyas, R.V., Shelat, H.N.,
Nowlan, D. 2011. “Production of
Patel, H.K. and Patel, K.T. 2014.
algae-based biodiesel using the
“Isolation and characterization of
continuous catalytic Mcgyan®
methane utilizing bacteria from
process”. Bioresource technology
wetland paddy ecosystem”. World
102(1):94-100.
Journal of Microbiology and
Biotechnology 30(6):1845-1860. Lalitha, S. 2017. “Plant
Growth–Promoting Microbes: A Boon
264 Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
for Sustainable Agriculture”. In: novel genera Providencia and
Sustainable Agriculture towards Food Alcaligenes along with cyanobacteria
Security, Springer, Singapore: 125-158. for wheat”. Archives of Agronomy and
Soil Science 57(8):873-887.
Large, P.J. 1983. “Methylotrophy and
methanogenesis”. Aspects of Manjunath, M., Kanchan, A., Ranjan,
Microbiology. Springer, Netherland: K., Venkatachalam, S., Prasanna, R.,
8:88. Ramakrishnan, B., Hossain, F., Nain, L.,
Shivay, Y.S., Rai, A.B. and Singh, B.
Lipper, L., Thornton, P., Campbell, B.M.,
2016. “Bene cial cyanobacteria and
Baedeker, T., Braimoh, A. and Bwalya,
eubacteria synergistically enhance
M. 2014. “Climate-smart agriculture
bioavailability of soil nutrients and
for food security”. Nature climate
yield of okra”. Heliyon 2(2):00066.
change 4(12): 1068-1072.
[Link]
López-Mondéjar, R., Zühlke, D., Becher, 6.e00066 2
D., Riedel, K. and Baldrian, P. 2016.
Manjunath, M., Singh, A., Tripathi,
“Cellulose and hemicellulose
A.N., Prasanna, R., Rai, A.B. and Singh,
decomposition by forest soil bacteria
B. 2017. “Bioprospecting the
proceeds by the action of structurally
fungicides compatible Trichoderma
variable enzymatic systems”. Scienti c
asperellum isolate effective against
reports 6:25279.
multiple plant pathogens in vitro”.
Lovley, D.R. and Phillips, E.J.P. 1987. Journal of Environmental Biology
“Competitive mechanisms for 38(4): 553-560.
inhibition of sulfate reduction and
Manjunath, M., Kumar, U., Yadava,
methane production in the zone of
R.B., Rai, A.B. and Singh, B. 2018.
ferric iron reduction in sediments”.
“In uence of organic and inorganic
Applied and Environmental
sources of nutrients on the functional
Microbiology 53(11):2636-2641.
diversity of microbial communities in
Malik, Z., Ahmad, M., Abassi, G.H., the vegetable cropping system of the
Dawood, M., Hussain, A. and Jamil, M. Indo-Gangetic plains”. Comptes
2017. “Agrochemicals and soil Rendus Biologies 341(6):349-357.
microbes: interaction for soil health”.
Meena, V.S., Maurya. B.R. and Verma,
In: Xenobiotics in the Soil Environment
J. P. 2 0 14. “ Does a r h izos p he r ic
Springer Cham: 139-152.
microorganism enhance K+ availability
Malviya, S., Scalco, E., Audic, S., in agricultural soils?” Microbiological
Vincent, F., Veluchamy, A., Poulain, J., research 169(5-6):337-347.
Wincker, P., Iudicone, D., de Vargas, C.,
Mohanty, S. and Swain, C.K. 2018.
Bittner, L. and Zingone, A. 2016.
“Role of microbes in climate smart
“Insights into global diatom
agriculture”. In: Microorganisms for
distribution and diversity in the world's
Green Revolution Springer Singapore:
ocean”. Proceedings of the National
129-140.
Academy of Sciences 113(11):E1516-
E1525. Nishizawa, T., Quan, A., Kai, A., Tago,
K., Ishii, S., Shen, W., Isobe, K., Otsuka,
Manjunath, M., Prasanna, R., Sharma,
S. and Senoo, K. 2014. “Inoculation
P., Nain, L. and Singh, R. 2011.
with N2-generating denitri er strains
“Developing PGPR consortia using
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies 265
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
mitigates N2O emission from P r a t i b h a , G . , K o r w a r, G . R . ,
agricultural soil fertilized with poultry Venkateswarlu, B., Desai, S., Ravindra
manure”. Biology and fertility of soils Chary, G., Srinivasa rao, M., Srinivas, K.,
50(6):1001-1007. Srinivasarao, K., Srinivasarao, Ch.,
Amalraj, L.D., Choudhary, D.K., Raju,
Oremland, R.S. and Culbertson, C.W.
B.M.K. and Srinivas, I. 2013.
1992. “Importance of methane-
“Utilization of composted bixa shell
oxidizing bacteria in the methane
with different bioinoculants as soil
budget as revealed by the use of a
amendment for ashwagandha and
speci c inhibitor”. Nature
bixa growth”. Ecological engineering
356(6368):421-423.
61:235-244.
Pajares M.S. and Ramos, R. 2019.
Rajawat, M.V.S., Singh, R., Singh, D.
“Processes and Microorganisms
and Saxena, A.K. 2019a.
Involved in the Marine Nitrogen Cycle:
“Psychrotrophs of the genus
Knowledge and Gaps”. Frontiers in
Janthinobacterium with potential to
Marine Science 6:739.
weather potassium aluminosilicate
Pan, I., Dam, B. and Sen, S.K. 2012. mineral”. 3 Biotech 9(4):142.
“Composting of common organic
Rajawat, M.V.S., Singh, R., Singh, D.
wastes using microbial inoculants”. 3
and Saxena, A.K. 2019b. “Buffering
Biotech 2(2):127-134.
Reduces Potassium Solubilising
Patil, P.D., Gude, V.G., Mannarswamy, Potential of Selected Bacterial
A., Deng, S., Cooke, P., Munson-McGee, Isolates”. Biosciences Biotechnology
S., Rhodes, I., Lammers, P. and Research Asia 16(1):19-25.
Nirmalakhandan, N. 2011.
Rajawat, M.V.S., Singh, R., Singh, D.,
“Optimization of direct conversion of
Yadav, A.N., Singh, S., Kumar, M. and
wet algae to biodiesel under
Saxena, A.K. 2020. “Spatial distribution
supercritical methanol conditions”.
and identi cation of bacteria in
Bioresource technology 102(1):118-
stressed environments capable to
122.
weather potassium aluminosilicate
Paustian, K., Lehmann, J., Ogle, S., mineral”. Brazilian Journal of
Reay, D., Robertson, G.P. and Smith, P. M i c r o b i o l o g y
2016. “Climate-smart soils”. Nature [Link]
532(7597):49-57. 00210-2
Pérez, J., Munoz-Dorado, J., De la Remy, W., Taylort, T.N., Hass, H. and
Rubia, T.D.L.R. and Martinez, J. 2002. Kerp, H. 1994. “Four hundred-million-
“Biodegradation and biological year-old vesicular arbuscular
treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose mycorrhizae”. Proceedings of the
and lignin: an overview”. International National Academy of Sciences
microbiology 5(2):53-63. 91(25):11841-11843.
Pfromm, P.H., Amanor-Boadu, V. and Richardson, A.E., Barea, J.M., McNeill,
Nelson, R. 2011. “Sustainability of A.M. and Prigent-Combaret, C. 2009.
algae derived biodiesel: a mass balance “Acquisition of phosphorus and
approach”. Bioresource technology nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant
102(2):1185-1193. g r o w t h p r o m o t i o n b y
266 Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
microorganisms”. Plant and Soil 321(1- Schils, R., Kuikman, P., Liski, J., Van
2):305-339. Oijen, M., Smith, P., Webb, J., Alm, J.,
Somogyi, Z., Van Den Akker, J., Billett,
Rillig, M.C., Wright, S.F., Nichols, K.A.,
M., Emmett, B., Evans, C., Lindner, M.,
Schmidt, W.F. and Torn, M.S. 2001.
Palosuo, T., Bellamy, P., Alm, J., Jandl, R.
“Large contribution of arbuscular
and Hiederer, R. 2008. “Review of
mycorrhizal fungi to soil carbon pools
existing information on the
in tropical forest soils”. Plant and Soil
interrelations between soil and climate
233(2):167-177.
change”. (ClimSoil). Final report.
Rillig, M.C. 2004. “Arbuscular
Schimel, J.P. and Gulledge, J.A.Y. 1998.
mycorrhizae, glomalin, and soil
“Microbial community structure and
aggregation”. Canadian Journal of Soil
global trace gases”. Global change
Science 84(4):355-363.
biology 4(7):745-758.
Roh, J.Y., Choi, J.Y., Li, M.S., Jin, B.R. and
Scott, S.A., Davey, M.P., Dennis, J.S.,
Je, Y.H. 2007. “Bacillus thuringiensis as
Horst, I., Howe, C.J., Lea-Smith, D.J. and
a speci c, safe, and effective tool for
Smith, A.G. 2010. “Biodiesel from
insect pest control”. Journal of
algae: challenges and prospects”.
microbiology and biotechnology
Current opinion in biotechnology
17(4):547.
21(3):277-286.
Ruzzi, M., and Aroca, R. 2015. “Plant
Shabbir, R.N., Ali, H., Nawaz, F.,
growth-promoting rhizobacteria act as
Hussain, S., Areeb, A., Sarwar, N. and
biostimulants in horticulture”. Scientia
Ahmad, S. 2019. “Use of Biofertilizers
Horticulturae 196:124-134.
for Sustainable Crop Production”. In:
Sameshima-Saito, R., Chiba, K., Agronomic Crops Springer, Singapore:
Hirayama, J., Itakura, M., Mitsui, H., 149-162.
Eda, S. and Minamisawa, K. 2006.
Shanware, A.S., Surekha, A.K. and
“Symbiotic Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Trivedi, M.M. 2014. “Potassium
reduces N2O surrounding the soybean
solublisers: occurrence, mechanism
root system via nitrous oxide
and their role as competent
reductase”. Applied and
biofertilizers”. International Journal of
Environmental Microbiology
Current Microbiology and Applied
72(4):2526-2532.
Sciences 9:622-629.
Santner, A., Luz, I.A., Calderon-
Sharma, S.B., Sayyed, R.Z., Trivedi, M.H.
Villalobos. and Estelle, M. 2009. “Plant
and Gobi, T.A. 2013. “Phosphate
hormones are versatile chemical
solubilizing microbes: sustainable
regulators of plant growth”. Nature
approach for managing phosphorus
chemical biology 5(5):301-307.
de ciency in agricultural soils”.
Sayer, E.J., Oliver, A.E., Fridley, J.D., Springer Plus 2(1):587.
Askew, A.P., Mills, R.T. and Grime, J.P.
Singh, B.K., Bardgett, R.D., Smith, P.
2017. “Links between soil microbial
and Reay, D.S. 2010. “Microorganisms
communities and plant traits in a
and climate change: terrestrial
species‐rich grassland under long‐term
feedbacks and mitigation options”.
climate change”. Ecology and
Nature Reviews Microbiology
evolution 7(3):855-862.
8(11):779-790.
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies 267
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
S i n g h , B . N . , R a j a w a t , M . V. S . , Applied Microbiology 9(2):1263-1271.
Hidangmayum, A., Ansari, W.A., Singh,
Singh, D., Rajawat, M.V.S., Kaushik, R.,
D., Zeyad, M.T., Kumar, S.C., Roy, M.
Prasanna, R. and Saxena, A.K. 2017a.
and Kumar, M. 2019. “Importance and
“Bene cial role of endophytes in
Utilization of Plant-Bene cial
bioforti cation of Zn in wheat
Rhizobacteria in Agriculture”. In:
genotypes varying in nutrient use
Microbial Interventions in Agriculture
ef ciency grown in soils suf cient and
and Environment Springer, Singapore:
de cient in Zn”. Plant and Soil 416(1-
171-187.
2):107-116.
Singh, D. and Fulekar, M.H. 2009.
Singh, D., Geat, N., Rajawat, M.V.S.,
“Bioremediation of benzene, toluene
Prasanna, R., Saxena, A.K. and Rajeev,
and o-xylene by cow dung microbial
K. 2017b. “Isolation and
consortium”. Journal of Applied
characterization of plant growth
Biological Sciences 14:788-795.
promoting endophytic diazotrophic
Singh, D., Meena, R.P., Taria, S. and bacteria from wheat genotypes and
Singh, G. 2014. “Assess the Role of their in uence on plant growth
Exopolysaccharide (EPS) Producing promotion”. International Journal of
Bacteria in Soil Moisture Stress Current Microbiology and Applied
Alleviation”. Journal of pure and Sciences 6(4):1533-1540.
applied microbiology 8(6):4701-4710.
Singh, D., Geat, N., Rajawat, M.V.S.,
Singh, D. and Singh, G. 2015a. Mahajan, M.M., Prasanna, R., Singh, S.,
“Isolation and identi cation of Kaushik, R., Singh, R.N., Kumar, K. and
ef cient exo-polysaccharide producing Saxena, A.K. 2017c. “Deciphering the
bacteria from rhizosphere of mechanisms of endophyte-mediated
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba and bioforti cation of Fe and Zn in wheat”.
chemical characterization of EPS”. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
Green Farming International Journal 37(1):174-182.
of Applied Agricultural & Horticultural
Singh, D., Geat, N., Rajawat, M.V.S.,
Sciences 6(2):365-368.
Prasanna, R., Kar, A., Singh, A.M. and
Singh, D., Singh, G. and Annapurna, K. Saxena, A.K. 2018. “Prospecting
2015b. “Isolation and characterization endophytes from different Fe or Zn
of ef cient exopolysaccharide accumulating wheat genotypes for
producing bacteria from rhizosphere their in uence as inoculants on plant
of wheat, maize and mung bean crop growth, yield, and micronutrient
grown in rain fed condition”. Green content”. Annals of microbiology
Farming International Journal of 68(12):815-833.
Applied Agricultural & Horticultural
Singh, D., Geat, N., Rajawat, M.V.S.,
Sciences 6(3):1-4.
Prasanna, R. and Saxena, A.K. 2020.
Singh, D., Manjunatha, B.S., Taria, S. “Enrichment of Fe in low and high
and Singh, G. 2015c. “Optimization accumulator wheat genotypes grown
and chemical characterization of exo- in soils with low/high available Fe”.
polysaccharide produced by Acta Physiologiae Plantarum.
Pseudomonas sp. isolated from wheat [Link]
rhizosphere”. Journal of Pure and 2997-4
268 Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
Singh, H.B. 2014. “Management of A.K. 2016. “Climate resilient villages
p l a n t p a t h o g e n s w i t h for sustainable food security in tropical
microorganisms”. Proceedings of the India: concept, process, technologies,
Indian National Science Academy institutions, and impacts”. In:
2:443-454. Advances in Agronomy Academic
Press. 140:101-214.
Six, J., Frey, S.D., Thiet, R.K. and Batten,
K.M. 2006. “Bacterial and fungal Srinivasarao, Ch., Kundu, S., Grover, M.,
contributions to carbon sequestration Manjunath, M., Sudhanshu, K.S., Patel,
in agroecosystems”. Soil Science J.J., Singh, S.R., Singh, R.P., Patel, M.M.,
Society of America Journal 70(2):555- Arunachalam, A. and Soam, S.K. 2018.
569. “Soil enzymes in semi-arid and sub-
humid rainfed agricultural systems as
Song, B., Niu, S., Zhang, Z., Yang, H., Li,
indicators of soil sustainability”.
L. and Wan, S. 2012. “Light and heavy
Tropical Ecology 59(1):99-108.
fractions of soil organic matter in
response to climate warming and Teske, A., AIm, E., Regan, M., Toze, S.,
increased precipitation in a temperate Rittmann, B.E. and Stahl, D.A. 1994.
steppe”. PloS one 7(3):e33217. doi: “Evolutionary relationships among
10.1371/[Link].0033217 ammonia-and nitrite-oxidizing
bacteria”. Journal of bacteriology
Sporleder, M. and Lacey, L.A. 2013.
176(21):6623-6630.
“Biopesticides”. In: Giordanengo, P.,
Vincent, C. and Alyokhin, A. (eds.). Thomson, A.J., Giannopoulos, G.,
Insect pests of potato: Global Pretty, J., Baggs, E.M. and Richardson,
perspectives on biology and D.J. 2012. “Biological sources and sinks
management. Oxford (UK). Elsevier of nitrous oxide and strategies to
463-497. mitigate emissions”. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society
Srinivasarao, Ch., Vittal, K.P.R.,
367:1157-1168.
Ve n k a t e s w a r l u , B . , W a n i , S . P. ,
Sahrawat, K.L., Marimuthu, S. and Vacheron, J., Desbrosses, G., Bouffaud,
Kundu, S. 2009. “Carbon stocks in M.L., Touraine, B., Moenne-Loccoz, Y.
different soil types under diverse and Muller, D. 2013. “Plant growth-
rainfed production systems in tropical promoting rhizobacteria and root
India”. Communications in Soil Science system functioning”. Frontiers in plant
and Plant Analysis 40(15-16):2338- science 4:356.
2356.
Vejan, P., Abdullah, R., Khadiran, T.,
Srinivasarao, Ch., Venkateswarlu, B., Ismail, S. and Nasrulhaq Boyce, A.
Lal, R., Singh, A.K. and Kundu, S. 2013. 2016. “Role of plant growth promoting
“Sustainable management of soils of rhizobacteria in agricultural
dryland ecosystems of India for sustainability - a review”. Molecules
enhancing agronomic productivity and 21(5):573.
sequestering carbon”. In: Advances in
Venkateswarlu, B., Srinivasarao, Ch.,
Agronomy Academic Press, 121:253-
Ramesh, G., Venkateswarlu, S. and
329.
Katyal, J.C. 2007. “Effects of long‐term
Srinivasarao, Ch., Gopinath, K.A., legume cover crop incorporation on
Prasad, J.V.N.S., Kumar, P. and Singh, soil organic carbon, microbial biomass,
Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies 269
Relevance of Plant Associated Microorganisms in Climate Smart Agriculture
nutrient build‐up and grain yields of World Bank. 2008. “World Bank data
sorghum/sun ower under rain‐fed on agricultural value added as a share
conditions”. Soil use and management of GDP in 2008”.
23(1):100-107.
Xiao, Y., Wang, X., Chen, W. and
Vineela, C., Wani, S.P., Srinivasarao, Huang, Q. 2017. “Isolation and
Ch., Padmaja, B. and Vittal, K.P.R. 2008. identi cation of three potassium-
“Microbial properties of soils as solubilizing bacteria from rape
affected by cropping and nutrient rhizospheric soil and their effects on
management practices in several long- ryegrass”. Geomicrobiology Journal
term manurial experiments in the semi- 34(10):873-880.
arid tropics of India”. Applied Soil
Xie, X., Zhang, H. and Pare, P. 2009.
Ecology 40(1):165-173.
“Sustained growth promotion in
Von Lützow, M. and Kögel-Knabner, I. Arabidopsis with long-term exposure
2009. “Temperature sensitivity of soil to the bene cial soil bacterium Bacillus
organic matter decomposition - what subtilis (GB03)”. Plant signaling &
do we know?” Biology and Fertility of behavior 4(10):948-953.
soils 46(1):1-15.
Yim, Woo-Jong, Woo, S.M., Kim, K.Y.
Wagg, C., Bender, S.F., Widmer, F. and and Sa, T.M. 2012. “Regulation of
Van der Heijden, M.G. 2014. “Soil ethylene emission in tomato
biodiversity and soil community (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)and red
composition determine ecosystem pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)
multifunctionality”. Proceedings of inoculated with ACC deaminase
the National Academy of Sciences producing Methylobacterium spp”.
111(14):5266-5270. Korean Journal of Soil Science and
Fertilizer 45(1):37-42.
Wilson, G.W.T., Rice, C.W., Rillig, M.C.,
Springer, A. and Hartnett, D.C. 2009. Zumft, W.G. and Kroneck, P.M.H. 2006.
“Soil aggregation and carbon “Respiratory transformation of nitrous
sequestration are tightly correlated oxide (N2O) to dinitrogen by Bacteria
with the abundance of arbuscular and Archaea”. Advances in microbial
mycorrhizal fungi: results from physiology 52:107-227.
long‐term eld experiments”. Ecology
Zúniga, C., Morales, M., Borgne, L.S.
letters 12(5):452-461.
and Revah, S. 2011. “Production of
Wolicka, D., Suszek, A., Borkowski, A. poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) by
and Bielecka, A. 2009. “Application of Methylobacterium organophilum
aerobic microorganisms in isolated from a methanotrophic
bioremediation in situ of soil consortium in a two-phase partition
contaminated by petroleum bioreactor”. Journal of hazardous
products”. Bioresource Technology materials 190(1-3):876-882.
100(13):3221-3227.
270 Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies