0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views5 pages

Cavite Mutiny and Rizal's Legacy

The document outlines the events surrounding the Cavite Mutiny of 1872, highlighting the roles of Cavite workers, Filipino soldiers, and the GOMBURZA priests who were executed. It also discusses the rise of the Propaganda Movement, the formation of La Liga Filipina, and the KKK, emphasizing the influence of key figures like Jose Rizal and Andres Bonifacio. Additionally, it details Rizal's trial, arguments against his charges, and his eventual execution on December 30, 1896.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views5 pages

Cavite Mutiny and Rizal's Legacy

The document outlines the events surrounding the Cavite Mutiny of 1872, highlighting the roles of Cavite workers, Filipino soldiers, and the GOMBURZA priests who were executed. It also discusses the rise of the Propaganda Movement, the formation of La Liga Filipina, and the KKK, emphasizing the influence of key figures like Jose Rizal and Andres Bonifacio. Additionally, it details Rizal's trial, arguments against his charges, and his eventual execution on December 30, 1896.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CAVITE MUTINY 1872

1. Cavite workers- Cavite Arsenal (weapons)


• Attacks
 San Felipe- Won
 San Roque- Failed (They thought the fireworks for feast was the signal)
 Cavite, Manila
2. Filipino soldiers – Leader of Revolution- Sergeant La Madrid
* Cavite workers and Filipino Soldiers- Death Penalty
*Revolt happened in Cavite Arsenal
3. Filipino liberals/ Illustrados
• Spain
• Monarchy Vs. Spanish Liberals
4. GOMBURZA- death by Garrote
*Garrote- device used in strangling condemned persons.

Secularization
-separation of priests / divorce
2 Types of Priests
• Regular Priests- Foreigners
• Secular Priests- Filipinos – the processor of secularization
3 Reasons Regular discriminating Secular
1. We have no education
2. We lack experience
3. Brown Skin
3 Friar’s Power
1. Wealth
2. Authority
3. Powerful
The GOMBURZA
• Petro Palaez- died because of earthquake
• Mariano Gomez
• Jose Burgos
• Jacinto Zamora
• Priests framed up the GOMBURZA by saying that they started the Cavite Mutiny, they
informed Izquerdo about it and they condemned them to death.
• Jose Rizal was inspired to the story of The GOMBURZA because when he was 9 years old, he
saw how the death of GOMBURZA, and they’re the story behind the Noli Me tangere and El
Filibusterismo.
• And Andres Bonifacio wss inspired to Jose Rizal’s worked, then he created the KKK
Organization.

• 1871 Carlos Maria dela Torre- First Governor General


• 1878 Rafael Izquerdo
• Falla- Polo y servicio
• Tax- Tributo
• Peninsulares- born in Spain
• Insulares- Grow up in Philippines
*but those are both Spanish
• Oreoles- 30% Indio, 50% Foreign- Filipino Liberals/Illustrados
• Principalia- Foreigner

1896 PH REVOLUTION

1888 LA SOLIDARIDAD
• Filipino Liberais (exiled) Spain
• Galicano Apacible (cousin of Rizal)
• promoted awareness of the needs of the colonies
• issued newspaper (La solidaridad)
1. Social/cultural and economic conditions of the Phil.
2. Speeches of Spanish Liberals
Propaganda Movement

• Peaceful Form
• Transition of the phil. from being colony- Province
1. Jose Rizal -Founder
2. Graciano Lopez Jaena- Main
3. Mariano Ponce-secretary
4. Marcelo H. Del Pilar-editor

LA LIGA FILIPINA
-very specific
• Rizal recruited all the member of org.
• Concentrated to the reforms for the Philippines.
• Detailed plans for the Philippines.

1892 Rizal in Dapitan, La Liga Filipino Declined


• Cuerpo de Compromisarios
- led by educated filipinos
• Conservative group
• Supported La solidaridad
• Apolinario Mabini

KKK
•Kataastaasang, Kagalanggalangang, Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan
• Supremo
1. Deodato Arellano (1893)
2. Ramon Basa
3. Andres Bonifacio (1895)
• Katipuneras
1. Gregoria de Jerus
2. Benita Rodriguez
3. Josefa and Trinidad
• Radical Group
• Reform through violence

THE INSPIRATION AND THE MAIN MEMBER


1. Jose Rizal
2. Andres Bonifacio
3. Emilio Jacinto
4. Apolinario Mabini
AUGUST 18,1896
• Apolonio Dela Cruz vs. Trodoro Patino
Teodoro Patino Honoria Null Tatlier Mariamo il-Patina- Dario de Manila existence of XXK –
Governor General Thomon Blanco
• Juez de cuchillo total aminilation of Indios
• Andres Bonifacio askes his men to fight
“Tearing of Sedula”
-A sign of their dettance and determination to rise against the Spaniards.
“Mabuhay Ang Pilipinas”
• Cry of Pugadlawin- cry for revolution in pugadlawin.

RETRACTION OF RIZAL
-A controversial issue of Jose Rizal

RIZAL’S TRIAL
Rizal was charged with 3 crimes:
• Rebellion- Acts of violence
• Sedetion- crimes against the state, treason
• Conspiracy- secret plan to do something unlawful.

12 ARGUMENTS OF RIZAL

1. He could not be guilty of rebellion for he advised Dr. Pio Valenzuela not to rise against
revolution.
2. He did not correspond with the radical, revolutionary elements.
3. The revolutionists used his name without his knowledge.
4. If he had a hand in the revolution, he could have escaped in Moro Vinta and would not
have built a home, a hospital and bought lands in Dapitan.
5. He was not consulted by the revolutionaries.
6. La Liga Filipina is a civic organization.
7. The La Liga Filipina did not live long.
8. The KKK was organized after his exile in Dapitan.
9. The La Liga Filipina did not serve the purpose of the revolutionaries.
10. His bitter comments of Rizal in his letter was solely his feelings of hate on how they were
treated.
11. His life In Dapitan had been exemplary as the politico-military commanders and
missionary priests would attempt.
12. It was not true that revolution was inspired by his speech at the house of Doroteo
Ongjuanco.

RIZAL’S DEATH
• December 28, 1898- Governor General Camilo de Polavieja signed the court decision of Rizal’s
execution.
• December 29, 1898- Rizal gave away his remaining possession to his mother and sister.
• December 30, 1989- Rizal died in Bagumbayan by firing squad at 7 AM.

RIZAL’S POSSESSION
• Mi Ultimo Adios
• Books signed by Rizal (Imitacion de Cristo)
• Letter to his Family

ACCOUNTS TESTIMONIALS
• PEDRO VICENTE BALAGUER
- The only eyewitness to the history
- He saw Rizal doing a devoted catholic would do (confession, rosary, communion)
• CUERPO DE VIGILANCIA
- Additional eyewitness account
- Guard of the cell of rizal
- Pedro Balaguer (claimed that Rizal retracted before his execution)
- Pedro Jose Vilaclara
- Estanislao March

Common questions

Powered by AI

The Cavite Mutiny exacerbated tensions between secular and regular priests. The regular priests (mostly European) discriminated against the secular priests (predominantly Filipino) due to perceived educational, experiential, and racial differences. The aftermath of the mutiny, where secular Filipino priests like the GOMBURZA were implicated and executed, highlighted the power disparity and individual ambitions between these groups. This situation intensified the clamor for secularization and deeper divides within the church hierarchy .

La Liga Filipina, founded by Jose Rizal, aimed to unite Filipinos in advocating for reforms under Spanish rule. Despite being a civic organization with peaceful intentions, it provided a platform for discussing socio-political issues, thus catalyzing Filipino consciousness for change. However, it quickly declined following Rizal's arrest and exile, as it lacked his leadership and momentum. Furthermore, its more radical offshoots, like the KKK, gained prominence by advocating for immediate revolutionary action .

The Propaganda Movement significantly influenced the Philippine struggle for independence by fostering a sense of nationalism and raising awareness about social and economic inequalities under Spanish rule. Through publications like 'La Solidaridad,' it disseminated liberal ideas and articulated the Filipinos' desire for reforms and eventual autonomy. Key figures like Jose Rizal, Marcelo H. Del Pilar, and Graciano Lopez Jaena used their writings to rally Filipinos nationwide, setting the ideological foundation for more radical revolutionary acts that eventually led to open revolt and the pursuit of full independence .

Jose Rizal's literary works, notably "Noli Me Tangere" and "El Filibusterismo," were pivotal in developing a Philippine national identity by exposing the social injustices and colonial abuses suffered by Filipinos. By using vivid storytelling and characters that reflected real societal issues, Rizal effectively united various Filipino social classes under a common cause for change. His writings sparked a nationalist awakening and inspired subsequent leaders to take political action, forming various reformist and revolutionary movements aimed at achieving national independence .

Jose Rizal was charged with rebellion, sedition, and conspiracy. He defended himself through several arguments: he advised against revolution, denied ties with revolutionary elements, claimed ignorance of revolutionaries using his name, and pointed to his actions, such as building a home and hospital in Dapitan, as evidence against his involvement. He highlighted that La Liga Filipina was a civic organization and dissociated it from the revolutionaries. Rizal argued that his comments about the oppressive regime were personal sentiments rather than incitations to revolt .

The execution of GOMBURZA galvanized Filipino nationalist movements by inspiring figures like Jose Rizal, who, at the age of 9, witnessed their execution. This event motivated him to write significant works such as "Noli Me Tangere" and "El Filibusterismo," which highlight the injustices faced by Filipinos under Spanish rule . Andres Bonifacio, in turn, was inspired by Rizal's works, which led him to establish the revolutionary group KKK (Kataastaasang, Kagalanggalangang, Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan).

The 1872 Cavite Mutiny was fueled by cumulative socio-political factors: discontent among Filipino workers and soldiers due to heavy taxation (Tributo), forced labor (Polo y servicio), and racial discrimination against native Filipinos. Adding to the unrest were inspirational liberal ideas promoted by Spanish liberals and Filipino ilustrados advocating for equality and rights. Filipino discontent was further aggravated by the dominance of Spanish regular priests over local secular priests, contributing to a volatile atmosphere primed for revolt .

Jose Rizal's trial and execution in 1896 drew international attention and criticism of Spanish colonial policies for being oppressive and unjust. As a respected intellectual and advocate for peaceful reform, Rizal's execution highlighted the harsh realities faced by Filipinos under Spanish rule, portraying Spain as intolerant of dissent and progressive thought. This negatively impacted Spain's international image, as they were seen as quelling legitimate calls for reform through excessive force, thus galvanizing sympathy for the Filipino cause globally and contributing to increasing pressure for reform in colonial administration .

The 'Cry of Pugadlawin' marked a definitive shift from peaceful advocacy to armed resistance in the struggle for Philippine independence from Spain. On August 23, 1896, Andres Bonifacio and other Katipuneros tore their cedulas (residence certificates) as a symbolic act of defiance against Spanish colonial authority, declaring the start of the revolution. This event galvanized support among Filipino civilians, symbolized a collective break from pacifistic reform efforts, and embodied the commitment to achieve independence through revolution if necessary .

The controversy regarding Jose Rizal's alleged retraction of his anti-Catholic and political views has significant implications for his legacy. While Pedro Vicente Balaguer claimed to witness Rizal confessing and taking communion before his execution, suggesting a retraction , this claim is disputed. This controversy impacts views on Rizal's steadfastness to his reformist ideals; a retraction may suggest he yielded under pressure, while denial supports his unwavering dedication to his principles. This debate influences his historical image, as either a martyr entirely committed to reform or a complex figure wrestling with deep personal conflicts in the face of death .

You might also like