0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views4 pages

Husbands' Victimization in Indian Law

The document analyzes the issue of husbands being victimized under protective legislation for women in India, highlighting the misuse of laws designed to protect women, which often leads to unjust consequences for men. It discusses the historical and constitutional context of women's rights in India, the specific legal provisions that favor women, and the lack of similar protections for men. The paper concludes with recommendations for reforming laws to prevent misuse and ensure fairness in matrimonial disputes.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views4 pages

Husbands' Victimization in Indian Law

The document analyzes the issue of husbands being victimized under protective legislation for women in India, highlighting the misuse of laws designed to protect women, which often leads to unjust consequences for men. It discusses the historical and constitutional context of women's rights in India, the specific legal provisions that favor women, and the lack of similar protections for men. The paper concludes with recommendations for reforming laws to prevent misuse and ensure fairness in matrimonial disputes.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, Vol (5), Issue (5), May (2024), Page – 710-713

International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews


Journal homepage: [Link] ISSN 2582-7421

Husbands Victimization Under Protective Legislation for Women in


India: An Analysis

Dr. Brijinder Bhushan


(Assistant Professor, BKSM Law College, Jalalabad (E)
Dharmkot, Dist. Moga, Punjab)
Residential Address: House no.1147, B-36, Behind Gurudwara Singh Sabha, Near J-Block BRS Nagar, Guru Amar Dass Nagar, Ludhiana, PIN
CODE 141012
Phone No.: 9915441558
Email: advbrijinder@[Link]
Subject: Law

ABSTRACT :

Matrimony is basis of institution of marriage which signifies complete physical, mental and spiritual union of man and woman as husband and wife to establish
family. But due to emergence of industrialized societies, social awareness especially in women about their right of equality and personal liberty meaning of
1
stability in context of marriage has been changing gradually in different span of times. Specific laws for women are misused by errant women and police
officers. Cry of victimized husbands their relatives is not heard either in courts or society. Practice proves that women specified laws are misused results
husbands suffer for no fault. Therefore, there is need to change mind set about law relating to women and thereby it is not fair to pre-establish that domestic
violence happens to wife only. In India there are no special laws for men. This study would reveal hidden suffering of men suffered more than women as law and
society doesn’t provide with enough solution to this specific issue resultantly reflects effects and challenges that male victim has to face. In this paper researcher
has analyzed existed specific laws and tried to suggest solution social as well as legal to solve this type of problem.

Key Words: Victimized, Matrimonial, Judicial Approach, Constitutional Aspect, Statutory.

Introduction:

In India marriages are considered sacred and supposed to be once in life time. Occasion of marriage is an integral part of social traditions and rituals
into which both side family members participated emotionally and community members give blessings for happy married life. Currently, increased
number of married couples experiencing incompatibilities and distress. Family and other courts, police administration and various counselling cells
2
are feeling helpless due to sudden bombardment of matrimonial problems related cases. It becomes rule in India that lot of social and legal concerns
expressed in favour of wives during matrimonial issues and ignored husbands and their family members and it turns more fatal during false implication
of cruelty to them to get undue benefit from women favored laws in India. Therefore, it proves that marriage in Indian society not only changes lives of
3
husband and wife but parents also and thereby harassment case is actually an exception to this rule. Number of favored laws provide for women who
claim to be harassed but not for men. Men who seek to fight back against such find that they have also to fight against systematic bias of govt, corrupt
4
system, police, courts alongwith prejudice propagated by famine organisations.

Historical Perspective of Women:

From anciently, in India women seen as member of family and group and not as an individual with an identity or right of her own and considered them
equal to men. In famous epic “Mahabharata” designation given as Shakti to her means prime energy source along with it is considered that there is no
Guru like mother. In earlier vedic period also women held higher and honored situation in gender relationship and having same right and access to
reading Veda’s getting education and say in choice of her marriage partners. Also in epics glorified as “light of the house, mother of universe and
5
supporter of earth and all its forests”.
During Muslims also women like Razia Begum rare to become ruler, Chand Bibi, Tara Bai and Ahaliya Bai holker left their great inspirations for ruling
their capabilities. During ‘Bhakti Movements’ women like Mira Bai, Mukta Bai, Jana Bai and others contributed spiritual life of country. According to
6
Manu “Where women are honored, there all sacred rites prove useless”. Guru Nanak Dev Ji says, “ within women is a man conceived from a woman,
he is born, he is married to woman and with her goes through life---why call her bad, she gives birth to kings, none may exist without woman, only one
7
true God is exterior to women”. During birth period it is evident from fact that Maharani Laxmi Bai participated in ‘First War of Independence’ in
8
1857.
International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, Vol (5), Issue (5), May (2024), Page – 710-713 711

Constitutional Provisions

Indian Constitution not only granted rights to women but also it empowers state to adopt measure of positive discrimination in favour of women for
neutralizing cumulative socio-economic, education and political disadvantages faced by them through Articles 14, 15, 15(3), 16, 39(a), 39(b), 39(c) and
9
42 are specific importance in this regard.

Statutory Provision under IPC:

Dowry Death

Under Sec. 304-B IPC punishment is awarded to husband or his relative for death caused to woman within seven years of marriage by burns or bodily
injury occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances and if it is shown that before her death she was subjected to cruelty by husband or relatives of
10
him in connection with demand of such dowry than it shall be of deemed to have caused her death.

Assault or Criminal Force to Woman with Intent to Outrage Her Modesty

Under Sec.354 IPC any person can punished for assault or criminal force to any woman intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that he will
11
thereby outrage her modesty. Outrage to female modesty is nowhere defined but it was defined by SC as ‘essence of a woman’s modesty is her sex
and thus giving skeleton to flesh’.

Sexual Harassment

Punishment awarded under Sec. 354-A IPC to man for physical contact and advances involving unwelcome and explicit sexual overtures or demand or
request for sexual favours or
making sexually colored remarks or forcibly showing pornography or any other unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature to
12
women.

Disrobing to Women

Under this man can be punished for assault or uses criminal force to woman or abets such acts with intention of disrobing or compelling her to be naked
13
in any public place.

Voyeurism

Under this man can be punished for watching or captures image of woman in private act in circumstances where she could usually have expectation of
14
not being observed either by perpetrator or by any other person at behest of perpetrator.

Stalking

Under this man can punished for follows woman and contacts or attempts to contact such woman to foster personal interaction repeatedly despite clear
15
indication of disinterest by such woman or monitors the use by woman of internet e-mail or any other form of electronic communication.

Sexual Intercourse with his own wife

Under this husband can punished for sexual intercourse with his own wife without her consent who is either living separately under decree of judicial
16
separation or otherwise.

Cohabitation Caused by Man Deceitfully Inducing Belief of Lawful Marriage

Under this man can punished for deceitful causes to any woman who is not lawfully married to him to believe that she is lawfully married to him and to
17
cohabit or have sexual intercourse with him in that behalf. Only man is liable under this and therefore it is not gender neutral legislation.

Cruelty

Under chapter XXA of IPC cruelty causing to women by husband or relatives of him is punishable and make offence nonbailable, non-compoundable
and cognizable by legislature to protect interest of woman for facing behind four walls of their matrimonial home.18
International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, Vol (5), Issue (5), May (2024), Page – 710-713 712

Words Gestures or Act Intended to Insult Modesty of Woman

Punishment awarded under Sec. 509 IPC to any person means male or female for intending to insult modesty of women by utters words or makes only
sound or gesture or exhibits any object intending that such word or sound shall be heard or such gestures or object shall be seen by such women or
19
intrudes upon privacy of such woman. The object of this section is to protect modesty and Chasity of woman.

Provision under Crpc, 1973

Under Criminal Procedure Code if husband having sufficient means refuses to maintain his wife unable to maintain herself then on application filed by
wife magistrate can pass order for maintenance and if further husband does not provide for maintenance then magistrate can for enforcement of this
20
pass order for imprisonment of one month for every part of monthly maintenance unpaid.

Provision under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

A wife alone can file divorce on ground of guilty of her husband rape, sodomy or bestiality under Sec. 13(2) of sub clause (ii) and secondly in same
way she can alone file for divorce if husband having more than one wife before 1955, provided that another wife was alive under Sec. 13(2) of sub
clause (i) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Thirdly, wife can only file for divorce after an order of maintenance 125 crpc or Sec.18 Hindu Adoption and
Maintenance Act, 1956 granted by the court, cohabitation has not been resumed for a period of one year or more. Further if marriage of wife took place
before 15 years of age and she rupidates marriage after completion of 15 years but before eighteen years then she can sue for divorce under Sec. 13(2)
21
of sub clause(vi) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Provision under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

Under this Act only application can be filed by aggrieved woman to judicial magistrate for redressal of their grievances against male family members
for domestic violence lived with her in domestic relation in shared household and to claim damages or compensation or other relief provided under Act
for injury caused. Therefore, this legislation is made for protection of constitutional rights of woman. It also concludes that this legislation is not gender
22
neutral.

Judicial Approach

Judiciary has played pivotal role to declare husband as victim under protective legislation for women in India through its various decisions are: -

Compelling husband to shift in laws house

Court allowed husband petition for granting divorce by considering compulsion caused by wife to shift in laws house amounts to cruelty, when husband
23
have only source of income for his old aged parents and younger brother.

Failure to reconcile with child from earlier marriage

Husband having son from earlier marriage and widowed mother. After second wedlock, female child was born resultantly wife refuses to take care of
son and blaming husband for discriminate with her daughter and apprehension for her dangerous to life in matrimonial home and further added
24
demanding refrigerator and scooter from her and thereby court held it amounts to cruelty granted divorce to husband.

Psychological and hysterical repulsion to sexual intercourse

In this court held that wife’s attitude in refusing to see specialist and continue her treatment for frigidity would appears to be willful act depriving her
husband of harmonious sexual relationship and further find that husband was very anxious to lead harmonious life together but wife was not willing to
25
make effort considered as willful refusal to f full-fill her matrimonial obligations amounts to treat the husband with cruelty.

Right of wife to reside in parental home of husband

The court held that if husband is alive and not resided with his parent then wife cannot claim to residence in parental house of husband as matter of
26
right and this claim considered as cruelty on the part of wife.

Allegations of illicit relations

It was upheld by court that making false allegation orally or in written form before court for having illicit relationship of husband with his sister and
defame sister practiced in medical profession as representative amounts to cruelty against husband. Resultantly, decree of divorce u/s 13(1) (ia)
27
deserves to granted.
International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, Vol (5), Issue (5), May (2024), Page – 710-713 713

Conclusion and Suggestions

Finally, it concludes that in spite of various legislations have been enacted in our country for protection and prevention of crime against women; crimes
against women have not stopped, rather they have taken more aggravated forms due to improper implementation of these laws. On the other hand,
position has become all more disturbing because these laws which were meant basically for protection of women have started misusing these laws by
errant women and police officers against men to settle their selfish scores by harassing innocent man folk by pulling them downwards through abusing
28
these laws, resultantly is serious concern for whole society. To maintain balance between protection of rights of women and to prevent of misuse of
law against men certain recommendations are -(a) Women Organisations should not encourage any woman to file criminal complaint against her in-
laws for minor matters and in case they assist then they should be made liable for prosecution.(b) Create family counselling centers to help aggrieved
families.(c) Speedy trial not only helpful for innocents but also lead to prompt redressal of grievances of real dowry victims.(d) Governments should
create awareness among officers about misuse of laws.(e) Mainly, 498-A should be made bailable to prevent harassment to old parents, unmarried
sisters, and school going children from languishing in custody without fault. (f) Matrimonial offences should be made compoundable to save institution
of marriage. (g) Stringent action should be taken by court against persons making false allegations to husband and his family. (h) On making false
allegations of dowry by women court should initiate proceedings under Dowry Prohibition Act. (i) In present social context there should be similar laws
to protect harassed husband and his family members from an unscrupulous wife. (j) Endeavors should be made at the earliest help of professional
counsellors, mediation, legal aid centers, legal professionals or friends and relatives in whom parties have faith be taken and avoid I.O. from
participating in this process.

REFERENCES :

1 Ajay Kumar,” Institution of Marriage-Judicial approach” All India Reporter 6 (2010).


2 Raj Kumari Agarwala, Matrimonial Remedies Under Hindu Law 66 (N.M. Tripathi, Allahabad,1974).
3 Law Herald (A Legal Magazine), Vol. 3, Part No. 16, Aug. 25, 2010.
4 Ibid.
5 Preeti Mishra, Domestic Violence Against Women 1 (Deep and Deep Publications, New Delhi, 2006).
6 Khanna and Verghese, Indian Woman Today (Vikas Publishing House, New visited on Nov Delhi, 1978).
7 R.C. Mishra, Women in India: Towards Gender Equality (Authors Press, Delhi, 2006).
8 Available at: [Link] Org/ Wiki/Women –in –india (las visited on Nov. 27, 2023).
9 Narender Kumar, Constitutional Law of India 115 (Allahabad Law Agency, Delhi, 2020).
10 B.M. Gandhi, Indian Penal Code 463 (Eastern Book Company, Lucknow, 2nd edn., 2006).
11 Ram Kirpal v. Madhya Pradesh, AIR 2007 SC.
12 Ibid.
13 Ibid.
14 The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act 45 of 1860), s. 354-C.
15 Id., s. 354-D.
16 Id., s. 376-B.
17 Id, s. 493.
18 Supra note 9 at 697.
19 Id at 737.
20 The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, s.125.
21 The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, s. 13.
22 The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act,2005, s. 12.
23 Ramesh Jangid Alias Rameshwar Jangid v. Sunita, AIR 2007 RAJ 160.
24 Kashmir Kaur v. Ravinder Singh Grewal, DMC 1990 Punjab and Haryana 594.
25 Shakuntala v. Om Prakash, AIR 1981 Delhi 53.
26 Ram Kumar v. Preeti Satija and Anr. (2014) 2 MLJ 599.
27 Bhavana N. Shah v. Nitin Chimanlal Shah, AIR 2012 Bombay 148.
28 Sushil Kumar Sharma v. Union of India, AIR 2005 SC 3100.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The IPC addresses issues of modesty and consent with a strong bias towards protecting women, exemplified by laws punishing outrages to 'female modesty' and acts like voyeurism, stalking, and sexual harassment. Sections 354 and 509 specifically target offenses against women, aiming to safeguard their dignity and consent. However, these provisions are not gender-neutral as they predominantly target male perpetrators, lacking equivalent protection or recourse for men who might be similarly victimized. This demonstrates a gendered application of modesty and consent laws, leading to a scenario where men face systemic disadvantages, as they are not afforded the same legal consideration under these sections .

Socio-cultural traditions in India heavily influence legal responses to matrimonial disputes, as marriages are often intertwined with deep-rooted customs and family honor. These traditions can pressure legal systems to favor women, historically perceived as the weaker party requiring protection. Consequently, laws such as those under the IPC prioritize safeguarding women against dowry-related harassment and domestic abuse. However, this results in a legal bias that sometimes overprotects women, neglecting male experiences and perspectives. The challenge remains to balance traditional values with equitable legal frameworks that respect both parties' rights .

Judicial perspectives on false allegations in matrimonial cases reflect an awareness of their detrimental impact on legal proceedings and families. Courts have recognized that false charges undermine justice, leading to unwarranted detentions and reputational harm for innocent parties. These allegations can prolong litigation and confound genuinely aggrieved individuals' ability to seek relief. As a result, some courts advocate for stronger judicial scrutiny and penal reforms to deter such abuses and ensure that matrimonial laws serve their intended purpose of protecting legitimate victims, maintaining focus on equitable justice rather than presumed biases .

Men are disadvantaged in matrimonial disputes under Indian law largely due to statutes that allow harsh penalties against males without equivalent provisions for females. They often find themselves navigating a system biased by laws on dowry harassment and domestic violence, which do not recognize husbands as potential victims. Judicial responses have sometimes recognized these imbalances; for example, courts have occasionally ruled in favor of men on grounds of cruelty perpetrated by wives, acknowledging psychological abuse or false allegations as bases for divorce. However, these responses are not systemic, and men typically face a burdened path within the legal system due to predominant biases against them .

To mitigate the misuse of women's protective laws in India, scholars recommend several reforms: making certain matrimonial offenses bailable and compoundable to prevent unnecessary hardships, encouraging the creation of family counseling centers, and enforcing stringent actions against those filing false claims. Additionally, they suggest legal protections be extended to men in situations of false allegations and the involvement of state mechanisms like mediation to address disputes more equitably. These recommendations aim to balance the protection of women's rights with safeguarding men against exploitation of these laws .

Constitutional provisions in India underscore gender equality and empower the state to undertake affirmative actions for women who face socio-economic and political disadvantages. Articles such as 14, 15, 15(3), 16, and 39 aim to ensure non-discrimination and have been instrumental in legislating protections like the Dowry Prohibition Act and Domestic Violence Act. These provisions impact women's rights today by legitimating protective legislation and fostering socio-political environments that strive to correct historical inequalities. However, while they contribute significantly to securing women's rights, critics argue they can inadvertently lead to biases that disadvantage men in specific legal contexts .

The concept of 'Shakti' has historically influenced Indian society by portraying women as powerful and essential for life and spiritual balance. This perception has traditionally empowered women, recognizing them as central figures in familial and societal structures. In modern legal contexts, this historical reverence translates into stringent protective laws that aim to uphold women's dignity and rights. However, the idealized perception can sometimes lead to one-sided policies that fail to address male victimization adequately, necessitating discussions on gender-neutral interpretations and applications of law to holistically honor the principle of 'Shakti' .

Judicial decisions recognizing husbands as victims under protective laws signal a crucial shift towards acknowledging the flawed application of gender-biased legal frameworks. Cases where courts have awarded divorces to husbands based on cruelty claims against their wives, such as psychological abuse, highlight judicial recognition of male victimization. These decisions inform the debate on gender equity by emphasizing the necessity of unbiased legal protections that account for abuse irrespective of gender, pushing for reforms to establish gender-neutral laws that can accommodate all victims, thus ensuring fairness and equity in legal processes .

Historically, women in India were viewed as integral members of the family and society. Texts like the Mahabharata conferred upon them a dignified status symbolized by the term 'Shakti'. However, over time, their socio-political status was undermined, especially during colonial and certain dynastic periods. The Vedic period acknowledged women’s rights to education and choice in marriage, while later eras saw a decline in their autonomy. This historical evolution is critical in shaping current legal frameworks that aim to rectify longstanding injustices but also occasionally result in laws that are not gender-neutral, contributing to an imbalance in legal remedies and protections for men versus women .

Men face significant challenges in India due to gender-biased laws that favor women, particularly in cases of alleged matrimonial cruelty. Despite various laws to protect women, these are often misused against men, resulting in undue suffering. Academic discourse, such as that by Dr. Brijinder Bhushan, highlights that the judicial and societal focus tends to predominantly support women, ignoring or undermining legitimate claims by husbands. Scholars advocate for recognizing the vulnerabilities of men under these circumstances and suggest legal reforms to ensure equitable treatment for both genders .

You might also like