0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views10 pages

Density of Plasticine via Graphical Method

The lab investigates the density of plasticine by examining the relationship between the mass and diameter of plasticine spheres. It concludes that density can be calculated using the derived formula ρ = (6m)/(πd) and finds the density to be (1.8±0.3) g/cm³. The results indicate that mass increases at a faster rate than diameter due to the proportional relationship between volume and surface area.

Uploaded by

anthillontop
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views10 pages

Density of Plasticine via Graphical Method

The lab investigates the density of plasticine by examining the relationship between the mass and diameter of plasticine spheres. It concludes that density can be calculated using the derived formula ρ = (6m)/(πd) and finds the density to be (1.8±0.3) g/cm³. The results indicate that mass increases at a faster rate than diameter due to the proportional relationship between volume and surface area.

Uploaded by

anthillontop
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

1

Hillary Andru
IB Physics HL 11
Block D
October 12, 2021
Finding the Density of Plasticine in a Graphical Method
Purpose:

This lab is done to find the density of plasticine using the relationship between diameter and
mass.

Introduction:

Density expresses a substance’s mass per unit of volume. It is expressed by its formula:

m
ρ=
v

In this lab, the density of plasticine will be investigated. This lab focuses on processing data,
graphing skills, and working with uncertainties.

Research Question:

How is diameter dependent on the mass of a sphere? How can density be found using this
information?

Variables:

Table 4.1 Independent Variable


Independent Variable Change and Measurement

Mass Mass will be dependent on the eight sizes of


spheres. Mass will be measured using a triple
beam balance.

Table 4.2 Dependent Variable


Dependent Variable Method for Measurement

Diameter Diameter will be measured to one-tenth of a


millimetre by using a vernier caliper.
2
Hillary Andru
IB Physics HL 11
Block D
October 12, 2021
Table 4.3 Controlled Variable
Controlled Variable Method for Control

Plasticine The type of plasticine used is consistent


throughout the spheres to prevent variations in
density.

Table 4.4 Uncontrolled Variables


Uncontrolled Variable Impact on Investigation

Temperature, humidity, and pressure of room Change in these values can impact the size of
plasticine spheres and therefore density.

Method and Apparatus:


Apparatus:
● 0.25kg of plasticine
● Vernier calliper
● Triple beam balance
● Paper towel
● Graphing software

1 5

2 6

3 7

4 8

Figure 5.1 Numbered plasticine Figure 5.2 Vernier Caliper


3
Hillary Andru
IB Physics HL 11
Block D
October 12, 2021
Method:
1. Divide the plasticine into 8 pieces of varied size and label each with a number for data
collection.
2. Roll the eight pieces of plasticine into spheres (Figure 5.1) either on a table or in between
one’s hands. Use paper towels to clean any grease off the surface.
3. Find the mass of each sphere using the triple beam balance (Figure 5.3). Record data.
4. Measure the diameter of each sphere using a vernier calliper (Figure 5.2). Repeat for five
trials. Record data. Be sure to rotate the sphere for each measurement to ensure that the sphere’s
shape is not compromised.

Sketch:

Sphere
Figure 5.3

Spher Vernier

Triple Beam

Figure 6.1 Sphere 1 on Triple Beam Balance


Figure 6.2 Sphere 1 in Vernier
Raw Data:
Mass, m,
Sphere (m ± 0.3)g Diameter, d, (d ± 0.09)cm
Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Trial 5
1 1.1 0.96 1.02 1.01 0.98 0.94
2 3.0 1.32 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43
3 5.4 1.74 1.73 1.74 1.78 1.74
4 9.1 2.04 2.07 2.24 2.17 2.14
5 18.4 2.66 2.63 2.64 2.65 2.60
4
Hillary Andru
IB Physics HL 11
Block D
October 12, 2021
6 34.4 3.24 3.29 3.32 3.35 3.32
7 56.4 3.74 3.91 3.83 3.85 3.96
8 75.2 4.31 4.32 4.31 4.22 4.30
The uncertainty for mass was determined by considering the inaccuracy of the triangle
measuring tip on the balance, potential calibration errors, and approximation of at what point the
balance mark was centred. The uncertainty for diameter was determined by ambiguous readings
and inadequate time for data collection resulting in rushed measurements.

Processing of Raw Data:


Absolute Relative Absolute Relative
3 3 3
Mass, m, dmean d d d
mean Uncertainty, Uncertainty, Uncertainty, Uncertainty,
max min
3 3 3
Sphere (m±0.3)g (cm) (cm ) (cm ) (cm ) Δd (cm) Δd Δd3 (cm3) Δd3
1 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.1 0.8 0.1 4% 0.1 12%
2 3.0 1.4 2.8 2.9 2.3 0.1 4% 0.3 11%
3 5.4 1.7 5.3 5.6 5.2 0.1 1% 0.2 4%
4 9.1 2.1 9.7 11.2 8.5 0.1 5% 1 14%
5 18.4 2.6 18.3 18.8 17.6 0.1 1% 0.6 3%
6 34.4 3.3 36.1 37.6 34.0 0.1 2% 2 5%
7 56.4 3.9 57.4 62.1 52.3 0.2 6% 5 9%
8 75.2 4.3 79.1 80.6 75.2 0.1 1% 3 3%

Sample Calculations:

1. dmean
d 1+ d 2+d 3+d 4 +d 5
dmean=
5
0.96+1.02+1.01+0.98+ 0.94
dmean=
5
dmean= 0.98
dmean= 1.0 cm

2. dmean3
dmean3= (dmean)3
dmean3= (0.982)3
5
Hillary Andru
IB Physics HL 11
Block D
October 12, 2021
dmean3=0.947
dmean3=0.9 cm3

3. dmax3
dmax3=(dmax)3
dmax3=(1.02)3
dmax3=1.06
dmax3=1.1 cm3

4. dmin3
dmin3=(dmin)3
dmin3=(0.94)3
dmin3=0.83
dmin3.=0.8 cm3

5. Absolute Uncertainty (Δd)


dmax−dmin
Δd=
2
1.02−0.94
Δd=
2
Δd= 0.04
Δd= 0.1

6. Relative Uncertainty (Δd)


Δd
Δd= ×100
dmean
0.04
Δd= ×100
1.0
Δd=0.04×100
Δd= 4%
7. Absolute Uncertainty (Δd3)
3 3
dma x −dmi n
Δd3=
2
1.06−0.83
Δd3=
2
3
Δd =0.115
Δd3= 0.1
6
Hillary Andru
IB Physics HL 11
Block D
October 12, 2021
8. Relative Uncertainty (Δd3)
3
Δd
Δd3= 3 ×100
dmea n
0.115
Δd3= ×100
0.94
Δd3=0.12 ×100
Δd3= 12%

Results:

Qualitative Observations:
As the mass of the spheres increased, so did the diameter. Mass increased at a faster rate than
diameter.

Quantitative Observations:
Through graphing, it was discovered that there is a proportional relationship between mass and
diameter cubed.

Figure 9.1 Mass vs Diameter


7
Hillary Andru
IB Physics HL 11
Block D
October 12, 2021

Axes were switched to allow the slope to be mass divided by diameter for easier density
calculation. Uncertainty used for mass is ±0.3g. Uncertainty used for diameter is ±0.2cm which
is the largest absolute uncertainty (sphere 7).

Figure 9.2 Mass vs Diameter Cubed


8
Hillary Andru
IB Physics HL 11
Block D
October 12, 2021

This graph was linearized by cubing diameter, which means that mass is proportional to diameter
cubed. Axes were switched to allow the slope to be mass divided by diameter cubed for easier
density calculation (step 5 of “Deriving and solving for density”). Uncertainty used for mass is
±0.3g. Uncertainty used for diameter is 14% which is the largest percentage uncertainty (sphere
4).

Deriving and solving for density:

m
ρ=
v
m
ρ= 3
4/3 π r
3m
ρ= 3
4 π (1/8 d ❑ )
24 m
ρ= 3
4πd
9
Hillary Andru
IB Physics HL 11
Block D
October 12, 2021
6m
ρ= 3
πd
6
ρ= × 0.956
π
−3
ρ=1.8 gc m

Table 9.1 Uncertainty of Density


Best Fit Line Density based on Density based on Absolute Relative
Slope (gcm-3) Maximum Minimum Uncertainty, Δ ρ Uncertainty, Δ ρ
Steepness Slope Steepness Slope (gcm-3)
(gcm-3) (gcm-3)

1.8 2.1 1.6 0.3 13%


Sample calculations for density, absolute uncertainty, and relative uncertainty are shown in
“Deriving and solving for density”, and equations 5 and 6 in “Processing of Raw Data”
respectively.

The density of plasticine is (1.8±0.3) gcm-3 or 1.8 gcm-3 ± 17%.

Interpretation of Results and Conclusion:

The density of plasticine was discovered to be (1.8±0.3) gcm-3. Density can be found using the
equation:
6m
ρ= 3
πd

This experiment shows diameter cubed is proportional to mass. This was confirmed by the result
of a linear graph when diameter cubed was plotted against mass. By rearranging the derived
density equation, the relationship between diameter and mass was determined to be:

3 6m
d=
πρ

As observed, mass increases at a faster rate than diameter. This is because mass is proportional to
4
volume while diameter is proportional to surface area. In the volume formula, V= π r 3, the
3
2
radius is cubed. In the surface area formula, A=4 π r , the radius is squared. This results in
10
Hillary Andru
IB Physics HL 11
Block D
October 12, 2021
volume increasing at a faster rate than surface area, and therefore mass increasing at a faster rate
than diameter.

Error Discussion, Evaluating Procedure, and Modifying Procedures:

The linearized best fit line does not intersect the origin, meaning that systematic error was
present in this investigation.

Table 11.1 Error


Error Type of Error Impact on Investigation Mitigation of Error

Triple beam balance Systematic Mass values skewed in one Properly recalibrate
not properly direction. balance between
calibrated every trial.

Deformation of Systematic Diameter values less than Increased caution


spheres from true value. when measuring
measuring diameter of spheres.

Improper spheres Random Diameter values skewed in Conduct more


both directions. measurement trials.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The experiment utilizes graphical methods by plotting mass against the cube of the diameter to linearize the relationship, making the slope directly proportional to density calculation (mass divided by volume). Transforming the data graphically allows for clear visualization of relationships and minimizes the impact of individual measurement errors, enhancing accuracy. This method also conveniently handles systematic errors related to mass and diameter inconsistencies .

Systematic error manifested in the misalignment of the graph's best fit line not intersecting the origin, suggesting biases in measurement procedures. It was primarily due to miscalibration of the triple beam balance and deformation during diameter measurements. Mitigation steps included frequent recalibration of the balance, careful handling and rotation of spheres during measurements, and conducting more trials to average out potential biases .

Relative uncertainty in diameter significantly affects density accuracy because the diameter is cubed to calculate volume. High relative uncertainty amplifies in volume calculations, strongly impacting density results, particularly since small errors in diameter are magnified. Managing this uncertainty through careful measurement techniques and multiple trials ensures that the derived density is as accurate as possible given the experimental constraints .

The relationship between mass and volume, derived through diameter measurements, allows for calculating density in irregular objects where direct volume measurement is challenging. For spheres, the volume is calculated using V=(4/3)π(d/2)^3. This formula, coupled with mass measurements, provides an indirect but effective method to determine density, avoiding geometrical inaccuracies encountered in direct volume measurements of irregular objects .

The axes were switched in the mass versus diameter cubed graph to allow for easier calculation of density. By plotting mass on the vertical axis and diameter cubed on the horizontal axis, the slope of the resulting linear graph corresponds directly to the density equation (mass divided by volume), facilitating straightforward experimental determinations and emphasizing proportional relations .

Primary sources of uncertainty included inaccuracies in the triple beam balance and the vernier caliper as well as potential deformation of spheres during measurement. Mass measurement uncertainty was ±0.3g due to calibration errors and balance reading approximations. Diameter uncertainty arose from ambiguous readings and rushed timing, leading to a relative uncertainty of up to 14% for some measurements. The effects were mitigated by recalibrating equipment between trials and increasing care in measurement procedures .

The experiment determines the density of plasticine by first measuring the mass of spheres using a triple beam balance and their diameters using a vernier caliper. By graphing the mass against the cube of the diameter, a linear relationship is established, allowing for the calculation of density using the formula ρ = 6m / (π d^3). The slope of the mass versus diameter cubed plot provides an easy path to derive density, overcoming issues of irregularity and uncertainties inherent in direct volume calculations .

The mass of spheres increases at a faster rate than their diameter because mass is proportional to volume, which uses the cubed value of the radius (or diameter), whereas diameter is related to surface area that uses a squared value. In the equation for volume V = (4/3)πr^3, the increase in radius leads to a cubic increase in volume, hence mass. Conversely, surface area A = 4πr^2 increases at a square rate .

Controlled variables, such as the type of plasticine, ensure consistent physical properties across all samples, thereby allowing for accurate comparisons. Uncontrolled variables, like temperature, humidity, and pressure, could affect sphere volume and, consequently, density measurements by causing plasticine to expand or contract. Understanding these variables' impacts helps in interpreting results accurately and determining error sources, emphasizing the experiment's reliability and reproducibility .

A linear graph when mass is plotted against the cube of the diameter confirms the hypothesis that diameter cubed is proportional to mass. This demonstrates that the volume, calculated as a function of diameter cubed, directly correlates with the mass of the spheres. The linear relationship also validates the model used to derive the density equation, indicating correctly scaled physical properties and consistent experimental conditions .

You might also like