Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Bowley Skewness is calculated using the formula (Q3 + Q1 - 2Q2)/(Q3 - Q1), where Q1, Q2, and Q3 are the first quartile, median, and third quartile, respectively. Given the cumulative frequencies, identify these quartiles and calculate the skewness. It quantifies asymmetry in data, with positive values indicating right skew and negative for left skew; zero suggests symmetry .
The principal's claim is tested using a z-test for a sample with a mean IQ of 111 against a population mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. The z-statistic is (111 - 100) / (15/√50) ≈ 5.20. Since 5.20 > 1.645 (z-critical value at 5% significance level), the claim is supported, suggesting the sampled students are more intelligent than the average .
The effectiveness of the advertisement campaign is evaluated using a t-test for the difference in means. The sample mean after the campaign is 147 dozens with a standard deviation of 16, compared to a previous mean of 140 dozens. With 25 degrees of freedom, the t-statistic is calculated as (147 - 140) / (16/√26) ≈ 1.92. Since 1.92 > 1.798 (the critical value at 5% significance level), the results suggest the advertisement was effective in increasing sales .
The correlation between ages and systolic blood pressure is assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Calculating the coefficient from the given data determines the strength and direction of the relationship. If significantly positive or negative, it indicates a strong relationship between age and blood pressure, with statistical tests like the t-test validating the significance of the correlation based on the sample size and correlation coefficient .
In testing whether variables are uncorrelated, we use the correlation coefficient from the sample. With a sample correlation coefficient of 0.42 from 27 pairs and a t-tests for correlation significance, the critical t-value at 5% significance level is 2.06 for 25 degrees of freedom. Calculating the test statistic t = r√(n-2)/√(1-r²) gives t ≈ 2.233509. Since t > 2.06, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude it is unlikely the variables are uncorrelated .
The chi-square goodness of fit test compares the observed bean populations (882, 213, 287, and 118) to the expected populations under the 9:3:3:1 ratio for 1600 beans. Calculating the expected frequencies as 900, 300, 300, and 100, the chi-square statistic is computed as Σ((O-E)^2/E), where O is the observed and E is the expected frequency. This results in a chi-square value of approximately 3.62. Since 3.62 < 7.81 (the critical value for 3 degrees of freedom at 5% significance), we fail to reject the null hypothesis, indicating the experimental results support the predicted 9:3:3:1 distribution .
The inference regarding the earnings of daily workers from states A and B requires a comparison of means using a two-sample t-test. The means are 44 and 30 with variances 900 and 400, respectively, each with a sample size of 20. The t-statistic is calculated, taking into account equal variances, yielding a result on whether the earnings are significantly different. The calculated t-value, when compared to a critical value for 38 degrees of freedom, determines if state A's workers earn more significantly than those in state B .
To determine if the machine produces washers significantly different from the designed thickness of 0.025 cm, a t-test is used. The sample mean is 0.024 cm with a standard deviation of 0.002 cm for a sample size of 10. The t-statistic is calculated as (0.024 - 0.025) / (0.002/√10) ≈ -1.58. Since |-1.58| < 2.262 (critical value for 9 degrees of freedom), we fail to reject the null hypothesis, indicating no significant deviation from the designed thickness .
Central tendency measures indicate the average or typical value of data, revealing where most data lies, and help compare datasets. Variation measures describe data spread around the central value, aiding in assessing data consistency. Skewness reveals distribution symmetry; positive skewness suggests a rightward tail, affecting mean interpretation. Kurtosis assesses distribution peaks; high kurtosis suggests a sharp peak, impacting variation perception. Together, these measures detail data distribution, helping identify patterns and make informed decisions regarding the dataset .
The rank correlation coefficient, specifically Spearman's rank, is calculated from the ranks of two datasets. Compute the difference in ranks (d) for each pair, then sum the squares of these differences. The coefficient is calculated as 1 - (6Σd²/n(n²-1)), where n is the number of observations. This coefficient assesses the monotonic relationship between the datasets, indicating whether high ranks in one correspond to high ranks in another .