Human Rights Training Manual for Prisons
Human Rights Training Manual for Prisons
oversight
of Reform and Rehabilitation Centres administered
by the Palestinian Authority.
Module 1
ENSURING HUMAN RIGHTS IN PRISONS
January 2010
Module 1
ENSURING HUMAN RIGHTS IN PRISONS
CONTENTS
Acknowledgements
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 6 Handouts
Dr. Shane Bryans, an international prison expert, prepared it for the United
Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). It is based on various UN and
other publications, details of which are included in Chapter 9.
This trainers' manual has been designed to give you the core materials that
you will need to deliver a five day training course on Ensuring Human Rights
in Prisons.
Chapter 3
Chapter 3 also provides some checklists of things that you, as the trainer,
need to do before, during and after the training sessions.
Chapter 4
Chapter 4 sets out the outline programme for the 5 day training course. The
starting and finishing times for each day are identified in the programme, as
are the times for breaks and lunch. You will need to carefully manage the
timing of each session to ensure that you adhere as closely as possible to the
programme.
You will need to agree who will be the lead trainer for each session and what
activities will be undertaken by the support trainer.
All days (except the first) begin with a 30 minute Review of the previous day's
learning. You can either summarise the key points covered the previous day
yourself or ask a participant to do so. Use the remaining time to invite other
participants to ask questions and raise any issues which were not clear.
Chapter 5
Chapter 5 contains the speaking notes and Power Point slides for each of the
14 sessions (session 15 does not require speaking notes as it is self
explanatory). Each session has been given a number (from 1 to 15) in order to
assist you to keep track on session material.
Speaking Notes
The speaking notes provide a basic structure, yet, they also allow you and
participants to be guided by the normal flow of the group’s learning process
and to decide to place more emphasis, as required, on questions and issues
as they emerge.
Slides
The notes specify when a slide should be shown and the text that will be on
the slide. For example:
Title
Each session begins by identifying the session number and title of the
session. The first slide for each session is the Title slide and gives the title of
the session and should be put on screen before participants arrive.
Duration
The duration of the session is then set out. The duration of the training
session reflects the time available in the programme. Some sessions are
scheduled to last 1 hour, others 2 hours. The difference in duration reflects the
amount of material provided.
Purpose
Key points
This is followed by the key points that will be covered in the session, which
are shown on slide 2.
Presentation notes
The text is intended to guide the trainer through the session and ensure that
all relevant topics are covered. The text is intended as a guide and not as a
book that should be read out.
You may want to read out some of the text during the session, until you are
completely familiar with the material, or where the points to be made are
complex. You should, however, avoid reading out all the text as this will
become monotonous for participants.
Discussion points
A number of 'discussion points' are set out in text boxes at various points in
the session. These discussion points will help to break up the session and will
encourage participants to engage in a dialogue with the trainer. Informal
discussions are useful to clarify points and facilitate the process of translating
ideas into practice. Such discussions are conducted by the trainer, who
should try to involve all participants.
You do not have to use all discussion points. You can also add discussion
points or follow up questions of your own. Discussion points are a good way to
manage the time (see Chapter 3).
Where there is a clear and unambiguous answer to the question in the
discussion point, this is given in the text below the text box. Where there is no
'one right answer' no answer is needed.
The last part of each session is a Small Group Activity. The questions are in
the same format, asking participants:
2. Do you think that there are any differences when compared to the
International Standards and Norms – both higher level of provision
and shortfalls?
The activity has been structured in this way to ensure that the participants are
familiar with the Palestinian Law and the international instruments covered in
the session. It also makes them consider how both should be applied in their
prisons.
x how many groups to divide the participants into and who should be a
member of which group. As the week progresses you may wish to
move people into different groups so as to change the interactions.
x how long to allow for the activity and for feedback. This will depend on
how much time is left until the end of the session.
You should move between groups during the small group activity to provide
clarification of the task, answer questions and ensure that the groups are
working effectively.
The groups are then reconvened and the results of the deliberations of each
group are presented to the full class by a spokesperson for the group. You
can ask all groups to present on all three questions or some variation thereof.
The course participants can then discuss the topics and the response of each
group.
Chapter 6
You should ensure that you have sufficient copies to give each participant a
set of handouts.
Chapter 7
Chapter 7 consists of the End of Course Evaluation Form. You should ensure
that you have sufficient copies to give each participant one. The forms should
be distributed at the end of Session 14.
Chapter 8
Chapter 8 provides a model Certificate for participants. You should arrange for
a certificate to be produced for each participant. You must ensure that the
name of each participant is correctly spelled on the certificate. The certificates
will be distributed in Session 15. Where possible, these should be handed out
by the director of the prison or a more senior officer from GARRC.
Chapter 9
Adult Learning:
A key aspect of being an effective trainer involves understanding how adults learn
best. Compared to children and teenagers, adults have special needs and
requirements as learners. Adult learners have the following characteristics:
The application here is that trainers must actively involve participants in the
learning process, and serve as facilitators for them. Specifically, they must enable
participants to participate in discussion, group work and other activities.
They should allow the participants to assume responsibility for presentations and
group leadership. They have to be sure to act as facilitators, guiding participants
to their own knowledge rather than supplying them with facts. Finally, they must
show how the training with help them reach their personal development
objectives.
To help them do so, trainers should draw out participants' experience and
knowledge, both prison related and more widely, which is relevant to the topic.
They must relate theories and concepts to the participants and recognise the
value of experience in learning.
x Adults are goal-oriented, usually knowing what goal they want to attain. They,
therefore, appreciate a training program that is organised and has clearly defined
elements.
Trainers must show participants how the training will help them attain their goals.
x Adults are relevancy-oriented. They must see a reason for learning something.
Learning has to be applicable to their work or other responsibilities to be of value
to them.
Therefore, trainers must identify objectives for adult participants before the course
begins.
This means, also, that theories and concepts must be related to a setting familiar
to participants. This need can be fulfilled by letting participants relate what they
are learning to real life situations in their prisons.
x Adults are practical, focusing on the aspects of a lesson most useful to them in
their work. They may not be interested in knowledge for its own sake.
Trainers must work with participants to explicitly identify how the sessions will be
useful to them on the job when they are back in their prisons
It is also important to remember that adult learners are widely diverse. Adults differ
from each other in experience, ability and background. Yet adults also differ from
each other in their preferred style of learning. Individuals acquire information and
learn from it in a variety of ways.
To make best use of this manual, the trainer needs to take into account these needs
of adult learners to be both an effective presenter and facilitator.
Presentation:
The trainer will first and foremost need to present the information. It is easier for
participants to learn when the presentation is good, and for it to be good it needs to
be well prepared. Thus, preparation for the presentation is essential. The trainer
needs to study the material and lecture notes in advance. The timing of the session
should be noted, and the subject matter prioritised – be sure to pay attention to the
key points. Practise the presentation, until it can be delivered confidently within the
time limit.
Speak clearly. Do not shout or whisper, and judge the acoustics of the room. Try not
to speak in a monotone voice, and it is always better to be too loud than too quiet.
Be natural – although not conversational. Deliberately pause in key places. This has
the effect of emphasising the importance of a particular point you are making. It is
also useful to change the style of delivery to arouse interest. For example, speed or
pitch of voice could be altered.
Look at the audience as much as possible, but do not fix on an individual – it can
be intimidating! Pitch the presentation to the back of the audience, especially in
larger rooms.
The slides should be integrated, and help to vary the texture. They are there to
make the presentation more intelligible, interesting, vivid and memorable. Research
has shown that we take in information in the following proportions:
For that reason the visual aid of the slides are important – participants grasp the
information faster, understand it better, and retain it longer.
Facilitation:
It is during the group discussion aspects that the trainers facilitation skills are most
needed.
Facilitation is being able to draw maximum engagement and performance from
individuals and groups. They are essential for anyone trying to guide a group of
people through a process of learning that encourages all members of the group to
participate.
Each person has a unique viewpoint and valuable knowledge to share. Without their
contribution, the groups’ ability to understand or respond to a situation is reduced.
Facilitation is about empowering others. It involves letting go of control over the
outcome of a process and giving that responsibility to the group.
x The group is more focused and productive, with better overall communication.
x Everyone involved has a chance to contribute, and feels they are an integral
part of the team.
x The people in the group realise and respect that the responsibility for
implementing decisions lies with everyone.
x People are encouraged to think and act for the overall benefit of the group.
A good facilitator will monitor who is contributing and who is not, encouraging
everyone to participate while remembering that individuals participate in different
ways. Some people may feel more comfortable talking in small groups, rather than to
the group as a whole.
At times it may be necessary to interrupt someone who is taking too long to make a
point.
1. Question asking
Facilitators use questions to help group members bring out relevant information,
clarify points of view, summarise information, and draw conclusions. The types of
questions that are particularly useful are:
x Questions that encourage other views: Can anyone provide another view
on this?
2. Paraphrasing
3. Summarising
The participants should also use the written material provided. For example, they
could be made to look up relevant international standards in the UN Standard
Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners and read them to the group. Materials
which are not opened during the course are likely never to be opened.
It is important to recap and summarise what has happened in the discussions, and
help the group make connections between the sessions.
Bring the group back to the issues they should be focusing on if they get sidetracked
onto other issues.
The final considerations regarding group discussions are to encourage feedback and
follow up on concerns.
If questions arise that a trainer is not able to answer, the trainer could ask the
participants for their view, or consult the material (by having a participant look it up),
or offer to provide the answer later – being sure to follow up as promised.
1. You will need to arrive in the training room before the participants in order to have
time to do some preparation including:
x Checking equipment
2. The level of physical comfort of course participants will have a direct impact on the
outcome of the learning exercise. For planning purposes, keep in mind the following
basic factors:
4. Study the training material, giving particular attention to the sessions to which you
are formally assigned;
5. Prepare any additional brief lecture notes, keeping in mind the time limitations set
out in the course programme;
6. Think about what practical examples that you might want to give to the
participants, based on your professional experience, to assist them in implementing
the relevant human rights standards in their daily work;
1. Participate in daily pre- and post-course briefings with the rest of the training team;
3. Meet with your session co-presenter the day before each scheduled presentation
to plan roles and activity;
5. Timekeeping - Once participants have been given a programme with timings in it,
the trainer must stick to the published times unless they agree with the participants
to vary the timings. If sessions overrun, participants get restless and tend not to
concentrate. Trainers must carefully monitor the time and move things on if
discussions are going on for too long or if groups have not returned from small group
activities. Trainers will need to be flexible in using the material - speeding up or
slowing down depending on how the sessions is going. Some discussion points can
be dropped and others added to regulate the time available.
7. Ensure that any comments or recommendations made are consistent with the
international standards set out in the training materials;
1. Participate in a final debriefing session with the rest of the training team;
DAY 2
DAY 3
DAY 4
DAY 5
TRAINING SESSIONS
INDEX
3. Physical Conditions
7. Security
Slide 1 – TITLE
Duration:
30 Minutes
Purpose of session:
Welcome
Icebreakers
Explain that it would be helpful to get to know the participants a little more and
to understand their expectations from the course.
Slide 2 - ICEBREAKER
x Name
x How long have you worked for GARRC
x Why are you attending the training
x And what you want to learn to make the workshop valuable to you.
Ask each participant to introduce the other to the larger group – by answering
the above questions about the other person.
Write on a flipchart the objectives given by the participants
Objectives
Explain participants what your objectives are for the training course and what
you are intending to achieve.
x To reinforce prison staff’s respect for, and faith in, human dignity and
fundamental human rights;
Include arrangements for meals and smoking/coffee breaks, and start and
finishing times.
Training methodoloy
Explain why the course is structured in the way that it is. In particular, it should
be highlighted that:
Group Rules
Spend 5 minutes discussing group rules – the rules that will govern how the
participants will work with each other during the training course.
Write the agreed rules on a flip chart and stick to the wall.
Handouts
Ask participants to have a quick look at the handouts - before breaking for
coffee.
Explain that you will be referring to the handouts throughout the training
programme and that they will need to bring the handouts to each session.
SESSION 2
Slide 1 – TITLE
Duration:
2 Hours
Purpose:
To introduce the principle of human rights, underlining the fact that individuals who
are in prison retain all their rights as human beings except those that have been lost
as a specific consequence of deprivation of liberty.
Key Points:
x All human beings are equal in dignity and rights, rights that stem from
universal human values.
x All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated at all times with humanity
and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person.
x International human rights law is binding on all States and their agents,
including prison officials.
Everything discussed over the next few days is underpinned by human rights. These
rights are derived from universal, general human rights principles - there are certain
rights and freedoms that are essential to human existence. They apply to every
individual whether they are in prison or not, and are intrinsic rights that come as a
consequence of being human.
Discussion point:
x Health
x Self-development
Basic universal human rights are enshrined in international laws and norms. Many
states in every region of the world have signed and ratified international treaties,
conventions, covenants and rules confirming these rights.
Discussion point:
What Rights do you think people should forfeit when they are in prison?
People held in lawful detention or in prison forfeit for a time the right to liberty.
Some other rights may be limited by the fact of detention or imprisonment. These
include: the right to certain personal liberties; the right to privacy; freedom of
movement; freedom of expression; freedom of assembly and freedom to vote.
The important issue is whether and to what extent any further limitation of human
rights is a necessary and justifiable consequence of deprivation of liberty.
Many people in prison are serving sentences. They are in prison as punishment
but not for punishment. The penalty consists in loss of liberty.
There are also many people in detention who are not serving sentences,
although they may be held in prison with sentenced prisoners. Some are awaiting
trial; others are awaiting other decisions, for instance, about political asylum or
immigration status. None are in prison either as punishment or for punishment. They
are in prison as a precaution. For them, too, life in prison should be made as close to
normal life as possible.
When the State deprives a person of liberty, it assumes a duty of care for that
person.
Discussion point:
What duties of care – in relation to Human Rights – do you think the State has
when it sentences people to prison?
The primary duty of care is to maintain the safety of persons deprived of their liberty.
The duty of care also embraces a duty to safeguard the welfare of the individual and
for the person to have opportunities for self development.
x The Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of
Detention or Imprisonment
These instruments provide a set of rules to help prison staff perform their duties
through policies and practices that are lawful, humane and disciplined.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, from 1948, is a broad outline of human
rights objectives which has inspired more than 140 human rights instruments. While
it is not a binding instrument, some of its provisions are considered to have the
character of customary international law.
Next, let us look at the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights came into force in 1976. The
Covenant details the right to life; the prohibition of torture; the prohibition of slavery,
servitude and forced labour; the prohibition of arbitrary arrest or detention; the rights
of all persons deprived of their liberty; the prohibition of imprisonment for failure to
fulfil a contractual obligation; the right to a fair trial; and the prohibition of retroactive
penal measures.
The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
or Punishment entered into force in 1987. The Convention goes considerably further
than the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in protecting against the
international crime of torture.
Along with the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners,
which will be dealt with in more detail later, the Body of Principles for the
Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention of Imprisonment and
the Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners are international instruments
that provide a comprehensive set of safeguards for the protection of the rights of
prisoners who are detained or imprisoned.
The content of these instruments form the basis for organising any prison regime,
and form the basis for much of the content over the following sessions. Their overall
statement is that all prisoners and detainees must be treated with respect for their
human dignity, with regard to the conditions of their detention. They deal
predominantly with the issues of treatment and discipline, contact with the outside
world; health; classification and separation; complaints; work and recreation; and
religion and culture – topics that form the basis for the training sessions.
Another important set of minimum rules are the United Nations Standard Minimum
Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice, also known as the Beijing
Rules, which are crucial minimum rules for the treatment of young people in prison.
The Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women and the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
are particular rules that focus on women. These will be considered in more detail in
Sessions 11 and 12.
Torture and Ill-Treatment
Something that stems from human rights, and is particularly applicable to prisoners,
is a universal prohibition on torture and ill-treatment.
Discussion point:
Article 16, Paragraph 1, of the Convention defines other cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment as:
Article 2 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment confirms the absolute nature of the prohibition on torture:
Under no circumstances is there ever any justification for torture or cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment or punishment.
x Staff, when carrying out their duties, must always act within the law;
x Officials, such as judges, should be able to visit prisons to ensure that torture
or inhuman treatment or punishment is not taking place.
Simply having a set of rules is not enough to ensure their application. The
implementation of human rights standards is closely watched at several levels.
Discussion point:
x Community-based organisations
x The courts
x The media
x Trade Unions
x Religious Organisations
x Academic Organisations
There are also regional organisations who have developed mechanisms to monitor
human rights standards by countries in their respective regions, for example in
Europe the European Court of Human Rights and the Committee of Ministers of
the Council of Europe. At the international level, human rights are monitored by a
number of international NGO’s and the United Nations.
Five treaty bodies also have competence to examine individual complaints of human
rights violations, under optional complaints procedures (the Human Rights Committe,
the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, the Committee against
Torture, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination agains Women and the
Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of
Their Families).
The third type of monitoring is through peacekeeping and human rights field
operations. Recently, the inclusion of human rights aspects in the mandates of
United Nations peacekeeping operations has increased dramatically. The
assignment of various human rights functions to the international personnel involved
in their implementation has included monitoring the human rights situation and
reporting on it.
Discussion point:
International human rights law obliges States to take all necessary measures to give
force to the standards contained in treaties and customary principles. This means,
among other things, ensuring redress for victims, prosecuting offenders, preventing
abuses and combating impunity.
In the first instance then, it is individual States themselves that must act to enforce
these standards, principally through their domestic legal systems. Where they cannot
or do not act, or will not prosecute, States may be compelled to extradite, transfer or
surrender an alleged offender for prosecution elsewhere.
Some treaties, such as the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, expressly require States
parties to try or extradite offenders.
At the international level, in the 1990s, in the wake of genocide and crimes against
humanity in Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, ad hoc tribunals were established
by the United Nations Security Council to bring to justice persons responsible for
serious abuses in those countries.
Subsequently, as the decade and the millennium drew to a close, the international
community advanced the cause of enforcement significantly with the adoption, in
Rome on 17 July 1998, of the Statute of the International Criminal Court, which
entered into force on 1 July 2002, creating a permanent international tribunal to give
effect to the affirmation in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that:
We will now look at the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the
Treatment of Prisoners, which were adopted in 1955, in more detail.
Discussion point:
What do you know about the Standard Minimum Rules? What aspects of prison
do you think they cover?
x Adopted 1955
x 95 Rules
The original 94 rules that make up the SMR have never been amended. In 1957 they
were approved by the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations, which in
1977 added a new Rule 95 in order to extend the scope of the SMR by explicitly
including persons detained without charge. This implies that the SMR are not
applicable only to people in prison but also to people detained against their will in
other places – such as police cells and psychiatric hospitals.
The SMR are one of the oldest international instruments concerning the treatment of
people in custody and have gained very wide recognition for their value and
influence in the development of penal policy and practice.
They contain a greater level of practical detail about the duty of care for prisoners
than is generally to be found in declarations, conventions and covenants.
Since their adoption in 1955 the SMR have been affirmed, directly and indirectly, by
other international and regional instruments. They have been recognized as an
accepted basis for penal policy by national legislatures and prison administrators.
The SMR have been used by national and international courts and other bodies to
shed light on the care to which people in custody have a right.
The recognition which the SMR have received means that they have developed a
special status amongst international criminal justice instruments. They have become
indispensable to the interpretation of international human rights conventions and
must be recognized as generally forming part of international human rights law.
Scope of SMR
The SMR are minimum rules; they establish the standards below which provision
must not fall. They are of an absolute and fundamental character.
x Prisons shall be well-ordered communities, that is, they shall be places where
there is no danger to life, health and personal integrity;
x Prison conditions shall not seek to aggravate the inherent affliction of being
deprived of liberty; they should not make prisoners worse in any way;
The key purpose of the Rules is stated in Preliminary Observation 1, that the Rules
seek to identify:
Slide 12 – SMR KEY PURPOSE
The reference to “essential elements” refers directly to the fact that the SMR
comprise only basic and minimum requirements - the necessary conditions for a
prison system to achieve minimally humane and effective standards.
But they do seek to set out what, by general consensus, is accepted as the essential
elements of good principle and practice in the treatment of prisoners and the
management of prisons.
Discussion point:
Do you think that all countries are able to fully implement the Standard Minimum
Rules? Why are they not able to fully comply?
Since legal, social, economic and geographical conditions in the world vary greatly,
not all the Rules can be applied in all places at all times. The fact that certain Rules
cannot be applied in all places at all times should stimulate a constant endeavour to
overcome practical difficulties in order to achieve the minimum conditions accepted
as suitable by the United Nations.
The Rules do not preclude experimentation for the development of practices which
are in harmony with the principles of the Rules and intended to further purposes
which can be derived from the Rules as a whole.
x Torture
x Corporal Punishment
x Racial Discrimination
x Gender Discrimination
x Misuse of Power
2. Do you think that there are any differences when compared to the
International Standards and Norms – both higher level of provision
and shortfalls?
Slide 1 – TITLE
PHYSICAL CONDITIONS AND BASIC NECESSITIES
Duration:
2 Hours
Purpose of session:
The purpose of this session is to emphasise that prisoners have the right to certain
standards of living through the physical conditions in which they are kept. These
standards include accommodation, sanitation, personal hygiene, clothing and
bedding, food and exercise.
Key Points:
x Adequate food and drinking water are human rights – all prisoners have the
right to food at usual hours, and drinking water whenever needed.
x All prisoners not allowed to wear their own should be provided with suitable
attire.
x Prisoners should be provided with separate beds and clean bedding, and
facilities for keeping bedding clean should be in place.
Accommodation
All persons deprived of their liberty have the right to an adequate standard of living,
starting with their accommodation. Prisoners are usually required to remain in a
particular location for extended periods. This accommodation must meet certain
basic standards.
Firstly let us consider Rule 9 (1) of the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of
Prisoners which deals with cells:
Slide 3 – CELLS
Whilst single cells desirably should be used for single prisoners, experience has
shown that it is not necessarily undesirable to forbid allowing two prisoners to occupy
a single cell, provided that its space, ventilation, furnishing, sanitation etc. are up to
standard.
Slide 4 - DORMITORIES
Discussion point:
When prisoners share accommodation there is always the possibility that sexual
and other form of abuse and bullying may take place. What steps can the prison
administration take to ensure the safety of prisoners who are sharing a room or
cell?
High numbers of people with criminal and sometimes violent backgrounds housed
together are likely to single out some vulnerable prisoners for abuse or are prone to
other types of dangerous behaviour, such as gang-related activities.
For these and similar reasons extreme caution on the part of the prison staff must be
exercised, in particular when using dormitory types of housing. Prisoners with a
history of violent behavior, either within prisons or outside, should never be housed
in dormitories. Prisoners should not be housed in dormitories unless prison staff
knows enough about them to be able to assess their suitability to be housed
together, as mandated by the Rule.
Many national prison regulations are much more specific than the SMR when it
comes to the actual size, temperature or ventilation of cells. The vagueness of SMR
is intentional in this place: a cell located in an extremely cold climate needs to be
different from a cell located in a tropical one.
The key part of Rule 10 is that accommodation must meet all requirements of health.
In other words, the administrators must take care to assure that conditions are not
harmful to a prisoner’s health.
Discussion point:
(a) The windows shall be large enough to enable the prisoners to read
or work by natural light, and shall be so constructed that they can
allow the entrance of fresh air whether or not there is artificial
ventilation;
(b) Artificial light shall be provided sufficient for the prisoners to read
or work without injury to eyesight.’ (Rule 11)
Spending an extended number of hours in a badly lit area may cause permanent
damage to the eyesight. Efforts should be made to assure sufficient light. Prolonged
exposure to artificial light only may also be harmful both to a prisoner’s vision as well
as to his or her mental wellbeing.
For that reason all windowless cells that currently exist (in clear violation of SMR)
must be eliminated and all other cells should have sufficient artificial light, in addition
to the source of natural light.
Every cell should have an electric switch inside the cell. Not being able to make a
decision about turning the light on or off unnecessarily adds to the feeling of
powerlessness and frustration on the part of the prisoner.
Discussion point:
To assess the adequacy of the lighting in each cell prison staff members may
conduct a very simple test by inspecting all cells with a book at hand and try to read
a few lines in each cell.
Slide 7 - SANITATION
Being able to take care of one’s physical necessities in private and in a decent
manner is extremely important to everyone.
It is particularly important that prisoners have access to a toilet at all times. Nobody
should be put in a position when one’s ability to take care of the most basic physical
needs depends on a guard and his or her availability or willingness to open the door
and lead a prisoner to a bathroom.
Toilets located in or adjacent to the cells should have covers and should be
separated from the living area by a wall or at the very least, a partition. This is
particularly important in prisons where prisoners eat in the cell because eating in the
presence of an open toilet is extremely unpleasant.
Efforts should be made to provide all cells with flushable toilets; if this is impossible,
containers used need to be emptied several times a day. Toilet paper should be kept
in constant supply.
Slide 8 - CLEANLINESS
Prisoners should be required to keep their cells clean; the prison needs to provide
the necessary supplies to do so, such as buckets, soap, mops, brooms, etc.
Discussion point:
How can the prison administration encourage prisoners to keep their rooms and
communal areas clean and tidy?
Each prison should devise a routine for maintaining the cleanliness of common areas
of the prison, using prisoners to undertake the work and devising a system of
remuneration or rewards for work performed.
Prisoners’ ability to maintain their personal hygiene determines to a large extent their
capacity to keep up their self-respect. Rule 15 makes clear that:
What types of toiletry articles should prisoners be provided with by the prison
administration?
The prison needs to supply prisoners with soap, toothbrushes, toothpaste and
towels, as a minimum. When prisoners are allowed to receive or buy such items from
outside, the prison still has the responsibility to have these items available, since
some prisoners will not be able to afford them.
One additional thing to remember when arranging for prisoners’ access to toilet
articles is to provide them with a place in which to keep toilet articles of personal use
(such as toothbrushes, for example) and the articles that are not kept in constant
supply in the common areas. This needs to be done to avoid theft and fights among
prisoners, but also to provide them with a sense of privacy.
Slide 10 - BATHING
Discussion point:
Efforts should be made to allow any prisoner the use of a bath or shower every time
he or she wants to use it. This ready access to hot and cold running water would
obviously be the ideal situation and should be the goal of every prison.
In tropical climates, prisoners may use cold water to wash themselves. If running hot
water is not available often enough, arrangements may be made to be able to heat
water and prisoners should be provided with washbasins.
Prisoners employed in very strenuous or dirty jobs should be able to take a shower
at the end of each shift.
That prisoners keep their body clean, and thus free of odor or insects, is also
important to the health and wellbeing of everyone forced to spend extended amounts
of time in the cell blocks, that is chiefly the prisoners, but their staff as well.
Discussion point:
What should the prison director do if a prisoner refuses to wash and keep clear?
Staff members should strive to encourage prisoners to keep themselves clean, while
avoiding the use of coercion.
It should be noticed, that personal hygiene and washing can include a religious
dimension. Rule 6 is the basic principle about no discrimination, among other things,
on grounds of religion. This means that prisoners should be able to undertake
personal hygiene in accordance with their religious beliefs.
Discussion point:
Are there any circumstances when it would be permissible for the prison
administration to shave a prisoner’s head against their will?
Prisoners’ heads should never be shaved against their will, except for demonstrable
medical reasons.
Prisoners should also be allowed to wear facial hair if they wish so.
As mandated by the rule, men who do not have beards should be enabled to shave
regularly. Obviously, access to blades or other shaving instruments may for security
reasons have to be closely supervised.
In addition, staff members must make absolutely sure that no shaving instruments
are shared by two or more prisoners.
Clothing
Rule 17 (1) of the Standard Minimum Rules then moves on to describe minimum
standards for clothing:
Slide 12 - CLOTHING
‘Every prisoner who is not allowed to wear his own clothing shall be
provided with an outfit of clothing suitable for the climate and adequate
to keep him in good health. Such clothing shall in no manner be
degrading or humiliating’.(Rule 17)
This Rule emphasises two major aspects of clothing, its protective function and its
social and psychological function.
Clothing should therefore be appropriate for weather extremes as well as for special
working conditions. But adequate and decent clothing, in addition to affecting in an
obvious way prisoners’ health, also affects their morale.
To wear one’s own clothing is a part of one’s identity and therefore increases one’s
self-respect and individuality. However some prison systems require prisoners to
wear prison clothing or uniform.
Discussion point:
The fundamental principle of Rule 88 is that untried prisoners shall wear their own
clothing. If, however, they wear prison uniform, Rule 88 (2) makes clear that it should
be different from that of convicted prisoners.
Where uniforms are still in use, or civilian clothing is provided, those should be
available in different sizes, so that no prisoner is required to wear inadequate size
clothing making him or her look and feel embarrassed or uncomfortable.
It is worth pointing out that there is a lot that staff can do to make the keeping of
prisoners’ clothes clean easier. In most places, with the exception of locations with
tropical climates and institutions equipped with clothes dryers, the most significant
problem is the drying of the clothes.
Staff, through their intimate knowledge of the institution and of its prisoners, are best
positioned to come up with a system for drying prisoners’ clothes and underwear, by
designating special area or areas, providing rope to hang the clothes on, etc.
Important aspects to also take into consideration while doing so are the fire safety
and the safety of the garments (where theft among prisoners is a problem).
Where prisoners are allowed to wear their own clothing and shoes, in addition to
devising a system for admission of these items from outside (Rule 18), it is
important to remember that some prisoners may not be able to afford clothes to be
brought to the prison for them or they may have no one to do it for them.
This is particularly true for poor and foreign prisoners. Thus, even if wearing civilian
clothes is allowed, the prison still has the responsibility to provide clothing for those
in need.
Discussion point:
What Rules on clothing do you think should apply when a prisoner is outside the
prison?
The SMR also consider the situation of a prisoner transferred outside the prison.
Rule 17 (3) states:
Slide 16 - BEDDING
It may appear obvious but Rule 20 (1) reminds prison administrators that they have
a duty to provide food and water for prisoners:
Slide 17 – FOOD
Discussion point:
How can the prison administration ensure prisoners receive good quality food?
What is meant by ‘usual hours’?
One very simple way for the prison staff director to assess the validity of these
complaints is - on regular basis or occasionally - eat the food served to the prisoners
themselves. Many prison systems also produce their own food – meat, dairy
products and vegetables – which makes sure that the food is fresh and low cost.
Other important nutrition-related factors, in addition to the quality and quantity of the
food, are where, when and how often the meals are taken and with what utensils.
Prison staff members should also make all efforts to assure that the utensils are
clean and in accordance with local customs of eating.
In institutions without dining halls it is also important to arrange things in such a way
that prisoners do not have to eat near badly smelling toilets.
With regards to water, Rule 20 (2) of the Standard Minimum Rules states:
Slide 18 - WATER
Drinking water should be available to prisoners at all times, both during the day and
at night.
When cells are not equipped with faucets carrying drinkable water staff members are
in a position to devise a system for keeping drinkable water in constant supply. Such
a system may consist of issuing prisoners with clean plastic soda bottles or other
safe containers to keep the water in or a number of other arrangements, always
making sure that the water is clean and that it is always in the cell, without the need
for the prisoners to ask for it.
2. Do you think that there are any differences when compared to the
international standards and norms – both higher level of provision and
shortfalls?
3. Are the provisions in the law fully and effectively implemented? If not,
what could be done to ensure compliance?
SESSION 4
Slide 1 – TITLE
Duration:
1 Hour
Purpose:
Key Points:
x A detailed register shall be kept of every prisoner, and all prisoners shall be
offered a proper medical examination and treatment as soon as possible after
admission.
x All prisoners should be provided promptly with written information about the
regulations that apply to their treatment and about their rights and obligations.
Admission procedures
The recognition of human dignity begins when a prisoner is first received at a prison.
First of all, it is essential that prisoners should be held in places that are officially
recognised as places of custody.
What information do you think should be collected from prisoners on their arrival
in prison?
A register must be kept of all those admitted to prison. Rule 7 of the Standard
Minimum Rules highlights that:
Slide 4 - REGISTER
Rule 7 (1)
(b) The reasons for his commitment and the authority therefore;
Rule 7 (2)
The register should give prisoners’ personal details in a manner that will ensure that
they can be identified. A register is particularly important when there may be a
danger that people can ‘disappear’ from the system.
As stated by the rules, the register should include the date of admission and release
for each prisoner. In addition, personal property should be registered.
Discussion point:
What else do you think should happen when a prisoner arrives in prison? Why do
you think that should happen?
‘The medical officer shall see and examine every prisoner as soon as
possible after his admission and thereafter as necessary, with a view
particularly to the discovery of physical or mental illness and the taking
of all necessary measures; the segregation of prisoners suspected of
infectious or contagious conditions; the noting of physical or mental
defects which might hamper rehabilitation, and the determination of the
physical capacity of every prisoner for work.’(Rule 24)
In some prisons though, it could be difficult for a doctor to examine all prisoners
immediately after admission. In these cases a qualified nurse could give preliminary
interviews, with the doctor only seeing prisoners referred to him or her by the nurse.
In addition, all staff, particularly those who work in the reception area of a prison,
should be specially trained to recognise prisoners who are most at risk of harming
themselves or of being harmed by other prisoners.
Discussion point:
What information do you think that prisoners should be given on arrival in prison?
Why do you think they should be given this information?
Wherever possible there should be an induction period for all new prisoners during
which the relevant legislation, regulations and routine of daily life in prison is
explained to them and they are given the opportunity to meet people who are
available to them, such as religious representatives, teachers and others.
This is also reflected in Principle 13 of the Body of Principles for the Protection
of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment:
It is also important that as soon as a person is admitted to prison, his or her next of
kin, partner or legal representative should be informed where he or she is.
(1) Promptly after arrest and after each transfer from one place of
detention or imprisonment to another, a detained or imprisoned
person shall be entitled to notify or to require the competent
authority to notify members of his family or other appropriate
persons of his choice of his arrest, detention or imprisonment or of
the transfer and of the place where he is kept in custody.
Discussion point:
Does the prison administration have a duty to inform family members that a
person is in custody, if the prisoner does not want them informed?
The prison administration must respect a prisoner’s decision not to inform their
family, if that is his wish. The only exceptions are set out in Principle 16 of the Body
of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or
Imprisonment
Classification of Prisoners
Discussion point:
These purposes are set out by the Standard Minimum Rules. Rule 67 states that:
Slide 11 - CLASSIFICATION
Slide 12 - SEPARATION
The rules provide both positive and negative reasons for classification – the positive
is basing rehabilitation on individual needs, while the negative reflects theories of
contamination and risk reduction. There are tensions between the two.
Classification and separation are linked in the Standard Minimum Rules. The object
is to emphasise the important distinctions between categories of prisoners and to
increase the likelihood that the distinctions will be observed in practice through
treating prisoners individually.
Discussion point:
There is also recognition that men and women, alleged offenders and convicted
offenders, civil and criminal detainees, young and old, have very different histories
and different needs with respect to treatment or self-development.
Slide 13 - DIFFERENTIATION
(c) Persons imprisoned for debt and other civil prisoners shall be kept
separate from persons imprisoned by reason of a criminal offence;
The planning of an individual person’s imprisonment has implications for the way in
which prisoners are dealt with from the moment they first enter custody after
sentence.
Discussion point:
Why do you think it is important to plan what a prisoner will do during his/her time
in prison? What things do you think should be considered when looking at a
prisoner’s sentence plan?
The planning process involves finding out about the individual sentenced prisoner.
The Standard Minimum Rules describe the prisoner as a passive participant, but
experience indicates that sentence planning works best when the prisoner is actively
involved in the planning process.
Transfer
An important aspect to the care and treatment of prisoners concerns their needs and
rights when being transported. The more differentiated a prison system is, the more
prisoners will be moved from one place to another. However, transport of prisoner
often presents specific difficulties and causes hardship. This is in particular the case
where pre-trial prisoners are transported to courts and vice versa.
Discussion point:
What are the issues that might arise for prisoners before, during and after
transfer? What is the responsibility of the police and what remains the concern of
prison staff?
Slide 15 - TRANSFER
(3) The transport of prisoners shall be carried out at the expense of the
administration and equal conditions shall obtain for all of
them.(Rule 45)
The same standards of care and conditions apply during transportation, as they do in
prison – who ever is doing the escorting. This means that the task of transporting
prisoners should only be undertaken by staff who have had the equivalent training on
SMR.
Release Preparation
Prisoners should be prepared for reintegration into society and provided with
adequate social support when they are released.
Discussion point:
In what ways can the prison prepare someone for release, especially if the person
has been in prison for many years?
It highlights that an important task of prison staff is to prepare prisoners to live within
the law after they are released from prison.
Prison staff should motivate prisoners to change their behaviour, and prisoners will
benefit from a pre-release programme.
Discussion point:
What types of organisation do you think can help prisoners prepare for release
and also provide effective after-care once the prisoner has been released?
Prison staff cannot work in isolation. We need to encourage governmental and non-
governmental organizations which work with former prisoners in the community to
come into the prison to build relationships with prisoners before they are released.
All agencies and services responsible for the reintegration of prisoners into society
shall ensure that all prisoners have the means and available resources to maintain
themselves in the period immediately following their release.
x Admission
x Transfer
x Sentence planning
2. Do you think that there are any differences when compared to the
international standards and norms – both higher level of provision and
shortfalls?
3. Are the provisions in the law fully and effectively implemented? If not,
what could be done to ensure compliance?
SESSION 5
Slide 1 – TITLE
CONSTRUCTIVE ACTIVITIES AND REHABILITATION
Duration
2 Hours
Purpose of session:
The purpose of this session is to underline that is not the task of the prison
administration to inflict further punishment on the prisoner. On the contrary, prisoners
should be encouraged to use their time in prison to learn new skills, to improve their
education, to reform themselves and to prepare for eventual release.
Key Points:
x The main aim of the prison authorities in their treatment of prisoners should
be to encourage personal reformation and social rehabilitation.
x The purpose of the prison regime should be to help prisoners to lead law-
abiding and self-supporting lives after their release.
x All sentenced prisoners who are medically fit shall be required to work. As far
as possible this shall give them skills for work in the outside world. Prisoners
should be remunerated for the work they do.
x All prisoners have the right to observe the tenets of their religion and to have
access to a minister of that religion.
Rehabilitation Focus
It is clear that people are sent to prison as punishment, not for punishment and that
treatment of prisoners must therefore not be punitive.
The Standard Minimum Rules reflect a treatment philosophy. The emphasis has
shifted towards providing prisoners, of whatever status, with assistance and
opportunities to develop their individual potential and to cope positively with their
return to society.
This view is grounded in the reality that today’s prisoner is tomorrow’s ex-prisoner. It
is in the interests both of the prisoner and of society to promote the prospects for
resettlement through positive treatment in prison.
Article 10 (3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states
that:
Rule 65 of the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners also
highlights prisons rehabilitative qualities:
Slide 4 - REHABILITATION
Discussion point:
What sort of activity do you think prisons should provide to assist prisoners to
reform and rehabilitate themselves?
Rule 59 of the Standard Minimum Rules sets out the requirement that prisons
support prisoners’ rehabilitation:
‘To this end the institution should utilise all the remedial, educational,
moral, spiritual and other forces and forms of assistance which are
appropriate and available, and should seek to apply them according to
the individual treatment needs of the prisoners’.(Rule 59)
Prisons should also seek to make minimize the differences between life in prison and
life in the community as Rule 60 (1) makes clear:
Slide 6 - NORMALISATION
The idea of making prison life as normal as possible has developed in recent years.
There is a growing recognition that to exacerbate the deprivation of imprisonment is
not only unjustifiable but also reduces the chances of resettlement on release and so
increases the risk to society, if the ex-prisoner returns to crime as a means of
survival.
Prison by definition is not normal. Attempts to make prison more like normal life can
never counteract the deprivation that loss of liberty entails, but may reduce the
alienating effect of imprisonment.
Discussion point:
In what ways can we make prisons more like society outside of prison?
Initiatives to maintain prisoners’ links with the outside world are an important part of
making prison life normal, as are facilities to allow prisoners to wear their own
clothes, and to clean and cook for themselves.
Provision for such activities serves several purposes. Reducing the difference
between life inside and outside prison encourages independence and responsibility,
gives practice in basic skills and reduces reliance on services provided by the prison
administration.
Dynamic Security
In addition to preparing prisoners for release, good prison regimes have another
benefit – what is often known as dynamic security – which will be discussed in more
detail in Session 7.
The concept of dynamic security was not recognised at the time when the Standard
Minimum Rules were framed. Nowadays, on the basis of long and hard experience,
it has become clear that security is not just about locking people behind doors and
bars – it is about keeping prisoners engaged in constructive activities and staff and
prisoners having positive interactions.
It is now generally acknowledged that prisons run safely and positively with the co-
operation of prisoners. External security (freedom from escapes) and internal safety
(freedom from disorder) are best ensured by building positive relationships between
prisoners and staff.
This is the essence of dynamic security: security depends upon good relations within
prisons and on positive treatment of prisoners.
Needs Assessment
Discussion point:
What factors do you think could form the basis for prisoner assessment?
Rule 66 (1) lists factors that could form the basis for prisoner assessment. This
implies a sophisticated assessment process, which in practice requires time and
skilled staff.
The requirement for updating clearly reflects the fact that prisoners’ needs change
over time. The process of updating entails regular feedback on individual
development.
What training do you think prison officers will need to be able to carry out an
effective assessment and reviews of prisoners?
The SMR recognise that inactivity and boredom are among the worst aspects of
imprisonment. Because overcrowding is a common feature of prison life, it is
particularly important that provision for activities involves occupying prisoners out of
their rooms and cells during the day.
The basic standards regarding activities stress that the normal situation outside
prison should apply to activities undertaken in prison. The recommended norm is for
prisoners to be out of cell during the day and occupied in useful activity and for the
activity to be a meaningful part of the prisoner’s development and treatment.
Work
Work for prisoners has been central to prison philosophy since the 19 th century.
Traditionally work is one of the main activities in prison. Prisoners should be involved
in a range of work activities which are useful and which will equip them with skills
that they can use after release. Yet it is difficult to provide all prisoners with full
employment in prison.
Discussion point:
Principle 8 of the Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners states that:
The Standard Minimum Rules also cover a number of work related issues in Rule
71.
The prisoners shall be able to choose the type of work they wish to
perform - within the limits compatible with proper vocational selection
and with the requirements of institutional administration and discipline -
Rule 71 (6)
Forced labour is clearly prohibited under the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (Article 8.3 (a)):
The only qualification is that hard labour is allowed as a punishment if and only if
directly imposed by a court (Article 8.3 (b)).
Clearly prisoners should only work if they are fit for work.
Discussion point:
Who should decide if a prisoner is fit for a certain type of work? What should
happen if a prisoner is claiming to be sick to avoid work?
Here again a similar procedure should be followed as in free society. A properly
qualified doctor may be asked to examine a prisoner upon his or her admission to
the prison about his or her health, including possible unfitness for work.
If a prisoner complains of illness and of not being able to work, a doctor should
examine him or her and report to the director about his or her being able to work or
not. The role of the doctor with respect to this is, however, a delicate.
Discussion point:
How many hours each day should prisoners work? Should they get any time off
work?
Making the prisoner’s working day similar to a working day on the outside is seen as
important for rehabilitation and resettlement purposes. However, there are obviously
staffing implications, if prisoners’ work is to last for a normal working day.
In reality many prisoners have little or no past experience of gainful employment and
often lack employable skills. Work in prison can provide opportunities for developing
skills.
Some of the work available in prisons may be work to keep the institution
functioning. This need not mean that the work is not useful in terms of experience
and development of working habits and skills, however rudimentary.
Choice
How should prisoners be allocated to work? How can they be consulted about the
work they want to do?
The organisation and methods of work in the institutions shall resemble as closely
as possible those of similar work outside institutions, so as to prepare prisoners for
the conditions of normal occupational life, as Rule 72 (1) points out.
In practice prison work and training may run at a loss because of lack of organisation
and insufficient demand for product, although there are examples of profitable prison
factories in some systems.
While more efficient operations are not ruled out, the SMR seek to ensure that the
priority is training rather than exploitation of the prisoner workforce for profit. Rule 72
(2) states that:
Discussion point:
What are the human rights considerations if a private company is allowed to set
up a factory in prison and employs prisoners in it?
The use of private sector companies can lead to abuses of prisoner workers, so
Rule 73 (2) makes clear that:
It is clear that there should be a clear contract concerning prisoners’ work. The
prison administration remains under an obligation to ensure that the terms of the
contract are absolutely explicit and that the prisoner exercises free choice as to
whether or not to undertake this work.
Local requirements concerning health and safety at work vary and may be
inadequate. The involvement of health and safety experts from the community in
inspection of prison institutions will help to keep standards in prison at least level
with those outside, as it is stated by Rule 74.
‘The precautions laid down to protect the safety and health of free
workmen shall be equally observed in institutions’.
The SMR also seek in Rule 75 to bring conditions of work inside prison in line with
the legal terms and conditions existing locally.
‘The maximum daily and weekly working hours of the prisoners shall
be fixed by law or by administrative regulation, taking into account local
rules or custom in regard to the employment of free workmen’.
‘The hours so fixed shall leave one rest day a week and sufficient time
for education and other activities required as part of rehabilitation and
treatment of the prisoners’.(Rule 75)
For example, if prisoners are needed to work overtime, they should be paid more for
this. It would be desirable to extend to prisons the remit of local officials charged with
inspecting work conditions in the community, as increasingly occurs in some
countries.
Work opportunities for prisoners may be limited by the amount of space, available
equipment or plant.
Discussion point:
What can the prison administration do to maximise the number of prisoners who
are employed?
Rotation of prisoners in work shifts can provide maximum use of scarce work
facilities.
In practice work opportunities and educational and other activities often coincide in
the prison timetable, so that the choices are mutually exclusive.
Pay levels
Discussion point:
How much should prisoners be paid for working in prison? Should the amount
they are paid reflect the profit made? What about those doing domestic duties like
cleaning or those doing education – should they be paid?
Slide 15 - PAYMENT
‘The system should also provide that a part of the earnings should be
set aside by the administration so as to constitute a savings fund to be
handed over to the prisoner on his release’. (Rule 76)
The sections concerned with prisoners’ work occur in the SMR under the part
applicable to sentenced prisoners.
Discussion point:
Should pre-trail detainees (unconvicted and remand prisoners) and civil prisoners
be made to work?
Rules 89 and 94 indicate the standards relating to work with respect to unconvicted
and civil prisoners, respectively.
About civil prisoners, Rule 94 states that “their (civil prisoners’) treatment shall be
not less favourable than that of untried prisoners, with the reservation,
however, that they may possibly be required to work.”
In practice the right of untried prisoners to choose whether or not to work often
translates into a denial of the opportunity to work. This generally occurs because
work opportunities are limited in most prison institutions and therefore are given first
to those prisoners who must work. This places untried prisoners at a distinct
disadvantage.
Lack of work for untried prisoners should not result in their being locked up for more
time than sentenced prisoners who have work. Providing other activity options for
untried prisoners is often seen as impracticable, given the perceived unpredictability
of their time in custody. This means that in practice untried prisoners often suffer the
worst conditions in terms of lock-up and inactivity. This is unjustifiable.
Education
Education and cultural activities are a fundamental part of human development, and
prisoners have the right to take part in education and cultural activities intended for
this development.
‘All prisoners have the right to take part in cultural activities and
education aimed at the full development of the human
personality.’(Principle 6)
Slide 18 - EDUCATION
The central role of education in prisoner programmes in many prison systems rests
on:
Discussion point:
What type and level of education should be available in prisons? What steps can
be taken to integrate education in prisons with the education system in the local
community?
Using the human resources in prisons in this way means overcoming traditional
attitudes towards the role of prisoners and staff. Prisoners often benefit greatly when
their teachers are not direct employees of the prison administration but teachers
normally working for the local education authorities.
As a first step in this direction it may be possible for institutions with limited
educational provision to employ prisoners who can read to explain to other prisoners
the rules and regulations concerning prisons, including the SMR.
However, teachers trained in adult and remedial education are important in the
prison context. Many prisoners have had poor past experiences of learning and
require special motivation to build confidence.
Education can be a vital avenue towards renewed self-respect and hope for a
positive return to society. Education is also seen as an aid to social reintegration.
Links between prison education and education in the general community are to be
encouraged.
Where prisoners choose education rather than work they should not be significantly
penalized in terms of their pay, or in other ways.
No distinction should be made between women and men as regards the types of
education and training activities made available to them, while the United Nations
Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (The
Beijing Rules) underline the particular importance of education in juvenile custodial
institutions.
Religion
Since freedom of religious belief is a basic human right, prisoners should be given
the opportunity to avail themselves of such services of their own free will.
Discussion point:
Should all prisoners be able to practice their religion and meet with their spiritual
advisor? What about prisoners in distress, solitary confinement, suicide attempts,
hunger strike, and severe illness?
Personal responsibility is at the basis of the standards for care with respect to
religion and arrangements are set out in Rule 41 and 42, which see religion as a
right of the prisoner, not as a duty for the prisoner:
Slide 19 – RELIGIOUS REPRESENTATIVES
These rules emphasise that all prisoners have the right to observe the tenets of their
religion and to have access to a minister of that religion. Prisoners also have the
right to access to qualified representatives of any religion.
The Standard Minimum Rules take a pragmatic position on group worship. Numbers
and facilities will dictate whether group worship is practicable for those belonging to
minority religions within an institution’s prisoner population.
If worshippers of other faiths have to share the place of worship, religious objects of
worship should be removable, so that they do not give offence to other groups.
Discussion point:
In order to prevent mental deterioration and to improve their level of education and
develop their understanding, prisoners should have access to books, classes and
cultural activities such as music, drama, art and recreation.
Slide 21 – RECREATION
Discussion point:
Activities can include: crafts; dancing; singing; acting; musical instruments; putting
on performances; yoga; writing stories and poems.
Library
Links with the community also can be improved by prison libraries. In co-operation
with outside public libraries they can in particular offer recreation as well as
educational activities, individually tailored to the interests, needs and capacities of
the prisoners.
Rule 40 of the SMR reads:
‘Every institution shall have a library for the use of all categories of
prisoners, adequately stocked with both recreational and instructional
books, and the prisoners shall be encouraged to make full use of it’.
However, In practice prison libraries are often very limited in space and content and
there is inadequate access for prisoners.
The assumption that prisoners will not or cannot make use of libraries, because of
illiteracy or lack of interest, is used as an excuse for poor provision. This cannot be
justified.
Discussion point:
As a start prison libraries should contain a core of materials concerning prison rules
and prisoners rights, including the SMR. Also the national and prison’s by-laws
should be available.
Libraries are not just a collection of materials; they imply the provision of trained staff
who can convey information, explanation and advice. Some times assistance is
provided by librarians of libraries outside, or by professional volunteers.
Prison libraries need to be aware of the special needs of prisoners who do not speak
the main language of the institution. Links with libraries outside prison can help to
provide materials in other languages.
What should be the minimum amount of time that prisoners are permitted in the
outside air? Should they be forced to go outside or forced to exercise when
outside?
The SMR acknowledge the importance of time in the open air for all prisoners. Rule
21 (1) concerns exercise and sport and makes clear that:
‘Every prisoner who is not employed in outdoor work shall have at least
one hour of suitable exercise in the open air daily if the weather
permits’.(Rule 21)
It may be noted, that Rule 21 creates the impression that prisoners are to be forced
to take part in exercise and training. Although prisoners should not be completely
free to participate or not, in case of refusal efforts should be made to persuade them.
International norms make clear that all prisoners, including those undergoing cellular
confinement as punishment, should have at least one hour of exercise outside every
day, where there is enough space to exert themselves physically.
The exercise area in the prison should be secure and easy for staff to observe.
Ideally it should be provided with a toilet and drinking water.
In addition Rule 21 (2) recognises that young prisoners have particular needs in this
respect, partly because they are developing physically and partly because exercise
is an important way for them to let off steam and use up their considerable excess of
mental and physical energy. There is the implication that the constraints of custody
are particularly onerous for the young. They may need more organized exercise,
possibly in the form of physical exercise or competitive games to channel their
surplus energy into constructive activity.
In practice many prison institutions for young and old recognise the central role of
exercise and sport in alleviating the stress of imprisonment.
Discussion point:
What sort of sports and recreational activity should be permitted in prison? What
equipment would be necessary?
Provision of sports and recreational equipment need not place excessive burden on
prisons. Access to outside space is important, but a ball can provide the basis for
recreation and exercise for a whole group of prisoners. Activity of this kind is useful
for health and good relations in the prison, particularly if staff join in. It may also be
possible to have a small number of personnel who are qualified physical trainers and
can organise activities with prisoners.
A number of prison systems have developed what are know as Offending Behaviour
Treatment Programmes. These programme focus on helping the prisoner to change
their lives so that they do not re-offend when they are released from prison.
Discussion point:
What made prisoners commit their crimes? What types of behaviour do you think
that the programmes should focus on?
x Religion
2. Do you think that there are any differences when compared to the
international standards and norms – both higher level of provision and
shortfalls?
3. Are the provisions in the law fully and effectively implemented? If not,
what could be done to ensure compliance?
SESSION 6
Slide 1 – TITLE
Duration:
2 Hours
Purpose:
The purpose of this session is to highlight that prison authorities have a responsibility
to ensure the physical safety of prisoners, staff and visitors. This means that prisons
should be places where there is good order, which involves much more than control.
When a prisoner refuses the legitimate rules of a prison there has to be a formal
disciplinary procedure to establish guilt and impose appropriate punishment. A
further purpose to this session is to underline that this procedure should observe the
principles of justice.
Key Points:
x Prisons should be safe environments for all who live and work in them, and no
one in a prison should fear for their physical safety.
x Order and discipline should be firm, but no more than is necessary for safe
custody.
x Prisoners who are subject to disciplinary action should have the right of
appeal to a higher authority.
Key principles
Discussion point:
What duties do you think that these Rights create for the prison administration
and staff?
In addition, prison authorities also have an obligation to ensure that prisons are safe
places, where all concerned can go about their daily business without fear for their
physical well-being.
The level of control over the daily lives and movement of prisoners must not be more
than is necessary to meet those requirements. All of this can be ensured with a
prison environment that is a safe place.
It is a primary duty of every prison administration to ensure that prisons are safe for
the prisoners who are compelled to reside in them and the staff who have to work in
them.
Both prisoners and staff should be safe from any kind of violence and threats to life
and health no matter from whence they come. The community too has a right to
expect that its members shall be safe from predatory activities by prisoners.
Discussion point:
What do you think are the three main elements in ensuring that prisons are safe
places?
There are three main elements in ensuring that prisons are safe places:
Order: Meaning that staff and prisoners are safeguarded by the fact
that prisons are places where there is order and control, rather than
chaos.
Order
The ways in which the disciplinary system and grievance mechanisms in prisons are
organised and administered are crucial for the safeguarding of the rights of prisoners
as well as the maintenance of peace and harmony in any prison system.
The purpose of the disciplinary and grievance mechanisms in prison is, of course, to
maintain or restore order and safety in the institution. However, the system will be
unable to achieve this if it relies entirely on force, intimidation and coercion.
Discussion point:
How can prison staff seek to positively influence and enlist the willing co-
operation of prisoners?
Prison staff can and should seek to positively influence and enlist the willing co-
operation of prisoners through humane leadership and good example. Very often, it
will be possible to elicit good behaviour from a prisoner who appreciates that he or
she is being treated as a mature human being with due respect and dignity.
It is not inappropriate for prison staff to maintain friendly and healthy relations with
prisoners. On the contrary, that is one of the more effective means of maintaining
peace and security in prisons – often known as dynamic security, covered more fully
in Session 7.
The disciplinary rules, including complaints and review procedures, regulating prison
life affect the conduct of prisoners and prison staff alike in their relationship with one
another.
It is necessary for the disciplinary and grievance mechanisms in prisons to enjoy the
confidence of prisoners, prison staff and the community by being seen to be both fair
and effective.
Prison disturbances such as hunger strikes, jail breaks, prison mutinies, riots and
even suicides, are often evidence that the prisoners feel shortchanged by the way in
which the applicable disciplinary rules are administered or that they do not have
confidence in the grievance mechanisms available.
Complaints and grievances will be dealt with more fully in Session 10.
Discipline
It is important that prisoners be made aware of the rules and regulations that affect
them in prison.
Occasionally, a small minority of prisoners may not accept or observe the rules of
the prison. When this happens there have to be special measures that need to be
adopted.
Rules 27-30 of the Standard Minimum Rules define the framework for discipline in
prisons.
The first key rule of the Standard Minimum Rules relating to order and discipline is
Rule 27, which requires that:
Breach of Discipline
Discussion point:
What are the options available to the prison administration and staff to deal with a
breach of the disciplinary rules?
3. where the breach is also a crime under law, by the formal sanction
of normal criminal prosecution.
Informal resolution
It is neither practical nor desirable for every breach of prison rules to attract formal
disciplinary action. Very often, an informal caution, friendly advice and
encouragement or an appropriate expression of disapproval will be enough to keep
an offending prisoner under control. It is only when these fail or are inadequate or
considered inappropriate that the formal disciplinary sanctions should be employed.
Criminal prosecution
It will also be most unhealthy for every other breach of the prison rules that qualified
as a crime under general criminal law to be prosecuted as such.
Discussion point:
Under what circumstances do you think that it would be appropriate to refer cases
to the police to investigate? What criteria should be used? Who should decide
whether to refer a case?
It is inconceivable, for example, that a prisoner who steals a bar of soap in order to
shower properly would be prosecuted for theft in a court.
Only the most serious cases deserve to be submitted to the criminal prosecution.
Again, the prison administration and prison staff will be responsible for deciding
when to refer a case for criminal prosecution.
Prison authorities should make prison staff aware of relevant guidelines and
principles governing staff discretion in deciding when and when not to submit
breaches of person rules for criminal prosecution.
If the breach of discipline is prosecuted as a crime, the prisoner is entitled to all the
legal safeguards and facilities necessary to defend himself or herself in the case. In
particular, he or she is entitled for this purpose to unimpeded access to his or her
lawyer or to any other legal representative or relative.
Internal disciplinary mechanisms
Discussion point:
What do you think should be the key elements of an internal disciplinary process
in order to ensure the upholding of human rights?
Principle 30 (1) of the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons
Under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment requires that such procedures
should specify the following:
That this should be defined in written law and regulations is also stated by Rule 29 of
the Standard Minimum Rules:
Prisoners and staff alike should know about the rules, it is not good enough just to
have them. Thus, a prison authority has a responsibility to acquaint and provide
prisoners as well as prison staff with the applicable disciplinary rules at the point of
admission to the prison.
One further safeguard is the requirement of Rule 30 (2) that prisoners should be
given an opportunity to know and to defend themselves against the charges before
being disciplined:
Slide 10 - DEFENCE
In addition, and in order to regulate the exercise of the power to discipline prisoners,
it is essential that the exercise of the power to discipline prisoners should be
exercised by a defined category of senior prison personnel. Rule 30 (2) states:
The prison administration should maintain a written minute of any occasion in which
the disciplinary power is invoked against any prisoner.
It is also essential for the rules to identify and state the channels of appeal or review
open to a prisoner who may wish to challenge the disciplinary procedure or measure.
The Rules should also be reviewed and updated periodically to correspond with the
current legal standards.
It is very important that prisoners who are testifying before formal, internal,
disciplinary or inspection proceedings should not be subjected to intimidation or
harassment. This would not only hamper the fairness of the process but also
undermine confidence in the grievance mechanisms in the prison, with possible
adverse consequences on security.
Discussion point:
Punishment
If found guilty, the prisoner may be subjected to a range of punishments which will
be laid down in the procedures.
The punishment should always be just and proportionate to the offence in question,
and should be the consequence and culmination of the disciplinary process imposed
after a complaint or allegation against a prisoner is established.
Some prison systems maintain order not through such formal disciplinary sanctions
but through the fear prisoners have of the unregulated measures that may be used
by the prison staff against prisoners that they may regard as recalcitrant.
Discussion point:
What form can these unregulated measures take? How can the prison
administration prevent them from being used?
The disciplinary rules established under the Standard Minimum Rules and other
relevant international standards do not permit this practice.
On this, Article 5 of the United Nations Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement
Officials provides that:
Slide 12 - United Nations Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials
‘No law enforcement official may inflict, instigate or tolerate any act of
torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment,
nor may any law enforcement official invoke superior orders or
exceptional circumstances such as a state of war, or threat of war, a
threat to national security, internal political instability or any other
public emergency as a justification for torture or other cruel, inhuman
or degrading treatment or punishment’. (Article 5)
As previously mentioned, both Rule 29 (b) of the Standard Minimum Rules and
Principle 30 (1) of the UN Body for the Protection of All Persons Under Any
Form of Detention or Imprisonment require that the form and duration of
punishment shall be defined in written law or regulations.
Forms of Punishment
In practice, the forms of punishment that may be imposed for breach of prison
discipline are many and varied.
Discussion point:
What forms of punishment do you think are acceptable under international law
and standards? What do you think would not be acceptable?
Principle 7 of the UN Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners states that:
Corporal punishment is then expressly prohibited, and is placed in the same class as
cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment.
It is not lawful then to beat or flog prisoners as part of punishment for a breach or
prison discipline.
Under Rule 31, sensory deprivation is also prohibited. It is not permitted for prison
authorities to lock up prisoners in cells with artificial light and inadequate ventilation
as punishment for breach of prison discipline or, indeed, for any other reason.
Reduced diet is also prohibited under Rule 32 (1), except in cases where a medical
officer has examined the prisoner and certified in writing that he or she is fit to
sustain it. The international norm today however, is to regard reduced diet as an
improper form of punishment.
Discussion point:
(b) Unreasonable
(c) Unnecessary
(d) Arbitrary
Finally, a prisoner should never be doubly punished for the same offence. Rule 30
(1) specifically states that:
Very often prisoners are transferred from their cell or from one prison to another after
serving punishment for breach of prison discipline.
This rule makes it unacceptable to combine punitive transfers with one or more other
forms of prison punishment.
Additional disciplinary measures other than those logically and directly related to the
form of punishment chosen should be avoided and care should be taken to minimise
any additional consequences of the punishment on other rights or entitlements of the
prisoner.
Discussion point:
What reasons are there for giving prisoners a right of review of their punishment?
It is essential for the maintenance of orderly community life in prisons that prisoners
who are dissatisfied with the ways in which the powers and procedures for
maintaining discipline in prison have been administered or exercised in relation to
them should have avenues for complaint.
Review is, therefore, needed for two reasons, namely to ensure that prison staff do
not abuse the powers and procedures through which they exercise disciplinary
control over prisoners and, secondly, to rectify any abuses or injustices that occur in
the administration of discipline in prisons.
The prisoners deserve to be made aware of the avenues for review that exist and be
encouraged to use them.
The need for some form of official review of the exercise of the disciplinary and
related powers over prisoners is contained in Article 8 of the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights:
This need is reinforced and reaffirmed in Article 2 (3) of the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights, in which States undertake an obligation to:
‘Ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right
thereto determined by a competent judicial, administrative or legislative
authority, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal
system of the state and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy.’
The prison administration is responsible for the internal review process. This would
ordinarily be part of the complaints mechanism that will be highlighted by Session 8.
Use of other prisoners in a disciplinary capacity
One further point of importance stems from Rule 28 (1), which makes clear that:
Only prison staff can exercise disciplinary powers over prisoners. Rule 28 (1) clearly
prohibits conferring disciplinary powers on certain categories and classes of
prisoners.
x Disciplinary system
x Punishments
2. Do you think that there are any differences when compared to the
International Standards and Norms – both higher level of provision
and shortfalls?
SECURITY
Slide 1 – TITLE
SECURITY
Duration:
1 Hour
Purpose:
The purpose of this session is to introduce the three types of security in prison:
physical security, procedural security and dynamic security. The purpose is to show
too that prison staff have a clear responsibility to protect the public by ensuring that
prisoners do not escape from lawful custody, but there should be a balance between
security and rehabilitation. Prison staff should give a high priority to helping prisoners
rehabilitate themselves.
Key Points:
x ‘Physical Security’ is walls, bars, locks and any other technological devices
and perimeter sterile areas.
Risk Assessment
In general terms, security refers to the actions that a prison needs to take in order to
prevent prisoners from escaping or causing harm to others.
The proper classification of prisoners based on risk assessment is one of the most
important steps prison managers must take to ensure safety and security in their
prisons.
Discussion point:
The level of security that is necessary will vary according to the risk of escape posed
by individual prisoners.
Discussion point:
What factors do you think will have an impact on the risk or likelihood of a
prisoner attempting to escape?
Some prisoners would present a high degree of risk to public safety if they were to
escape, thus it should be made extremely difficult for them, if not impossible.
Some prisoners would present no threat to public safety if they were to escape. They
should be held in low-security prisons.
Separating the low, medium and high-risk offenders is typically used as a means of
effective prison management.
Holding prisoners at the lowest appropriate level of security will enable prison staff to
supervise more efficiently the smaller number of prisoners who pose a real danger to
others; it will also ensure that the prison environment is as humane as possible – the
lower level the security the more humane the treatment is likely to be - and that
financial resources are not unnecessarily allocated to ensure highly secure
conditions for a large number of prisoners who do not require such a level of
security. It makes financial sense not to have prisoners in a higher security category
than is necessary.
Classification systems, which we spoke about in Session 4, often form the basis for
security and control restrictions. Without classifications, security tends to be geared
towards prisoners posing the highest risk of escape and control towards prisoners
posing the highest risk of disruption. This may result in the imposition of unnecessary
restraints on individual prisoners.
Physical Security
x Physical Security
x Procedural Security
x Dynamic security
Discussion point:
What do you think I mean by physical security? Can you give me some examples
of physical security in a prison?
Physical security is everything from walls, bars, windows and doors, to locks,
cameras and keys.
Discussion point:
Are there areas in the prison that should not be covered by cameras? What about
the inside of rooms and cells? What about toilets and washing areas? Does the
same right of personal privacy apply if a prisoner is suicidal?
The Standard Minimum Rules pay particular attention to the physical security
instruments such as chains. Rule 33 states that:
Procedural Security
Discussion point:
Can you give me some examples of security procedures? Which do you think are
the most important security related procedures?
Among the most important procedures are those concerned with searching, both of
prisoners and places.
There should be procedures for regularly searching all places where prisoners live,
work and congregate. These should include searches of living accommodation to
make sure that physical security features have not been tampered with.
Personal property may have to be searched from time to time. Prison staff should
carry out these searches in such a way as to detect any escape attempt or
contraband, while at the same time respecting the dignity or prisoners and showing
respect for their personal possessions.
Discussion point:
What issues do you think should be covered in the procedures to ensure that a
prisoner’s rights are upheld?
Slide 6 – SEARCHING
There should also be clear procedures for making sure visitors do not breach
reasonable security requirements, such as the searching of visitors. These
procedures have to see that visitors are not prisoners and the obligation to protect
the security of the prison has to be balanced against the rights of visitors to their
personal privacy.
It is important to recognise too that prison staff and contractors may also pose a
threat to security by smuggling into the prison banned or illegal material.
Discussion point:
What arrangements do you think should be put in place to prevent and detect
smuggling by staff and contractors, whilst at the same time ensuring their Human
Rights?
Again, they should also be subject to the appropriate searching procedures. These
types of arrangements will also make it less likely that staff will be put under
pressure by prisoners and others to bring banned items into the prison.
Some other types of procedural security include roll call at specific times of the day,
and selective monitoring of mail and telephone calls. The need to hold prisoners in
appropriate conditions of security needs to be balanced with the right to maintain
contact with the outside world, which is discussed in Session 9.
Dynamic Security
The notion of security involves much more than physical barriers and procedural
searches. This additional element is known as Dynamic Security.
Discussion point:
What do you think is meant by dynamic security? Can you give me some
examples of dynamic security in a prison?
Security also depends on an alert staff who interact with prisoners, who have an
awareness of what is going on in the prison and who ensure that prisoners are kept
active in a positive way. This is often described as ‘dynamic security’.
Placing an emphasis on the need for prison staff to establish good relationships with
prisoners is key to dynamic security. This concept rests on the notion that engaging
with prisoners and getting to know them can enable staff to anticipate and better
prepare themselves to respond effectively to any incident that may threaten the
security of the prison and the safety of staff and prisoners.
It is essential then to remember that security is not just a matter of walls, locks and
keys, but that security is strengthened when staff know the prisoners for whom they
are responsible and mix with them on a daily basis.
As the purpose of prison is not just to remove offenders from society, but also to try
and ensure as far as possible their rehabilitation, there should be a balance between
security and those programmes that are designed to enable prisoners to reintegrate
into society.
Use of Force
In a prison, tension is - inevitably - never far away. No matter how dedicated its staff,
it cannot be denied that the majority of prisoners are being held against their will.
A consequence is that prisoners may cause disturbances. They may simply resent
detention as such, or their anger may be directed against rules or against the staff. It
is important for staff to remain aware of their powerful position.
Staff must bear this in mind, and must treat prisoners as fellow human beings. This
means that they must not exercise more power than is reasonable and proper in a
given situation.
The above applies even more to the use of force - a very fundamental form of the
exercise of power. Before using force, an officer should always establish whether the
desired objective can be achieved by other means.
If these other means are not successful, the degree of force used should be
appropriate to the situation in question – as SMR Rule 54 makes clear:
‘Officers of the institutions shall not, in their relations with the prisoners,
use force except in self-defence or in cases of attempted escape, or
active or passive physical resistance to an order based on law or
regulations’.
‘Officers who have recourse to force, must use no more than is strictly
necessary and must report the incident immediately to the director of
the institution’. (Rule 54 (1))
These are the basic principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. They should always
be applied when force is used.
Discussion point:
What measures can the prison administration take to ensure that these principles
are applied? What can they do to ensure that staff are able to defend against
unfounded allegations by prisoners?
Instructions on the use of force and particularly on restrictions in use of force should
always be incorporated in prison rules, and staff should be well trained in this field as
stated in Rule 54 (2):
Slide 9 – SPECIAL RESTRAINT TRAINING
There are special situations, where use of force and the risk of ill treatment easily
can occur, such as riots, group fights and collective disturbance of order. It is of
utmost importance, that we are aware of how critical these situations are with
respect to possible ill-treatment.
It is also important that instructions are made, which not only explain how to deal
with these situations and what procedures should be followed, but which also give
guidelines on how to prevent excessive use of power and ill-treatment. Moreover,
such incidents often deteriorate the prison climate and can carry with them tensions
between prisoners and staff for quite a long time.
Discussion point:
In what situations do you think has research shown that abuses of prisoners’
rights are most likely to occur?
x After incidents such as riots and hostage takings, especially when prison
personnel have been injured;
x Experience also shows, that risks of undue force, disrespect and ill treatment
is imminent, when prisoners are between prisons in transport vehicles and in
the case of people with ‘weak complaining power’ for example, foreigners and
mentally ill prisoners.
What other means do you think are available to resolve protests before having to
resort to the use of force?
Only if such discussions do not solve the problem prison director should consider:
x Internal transfers
x Disciplinary punishments
Use of Firearms
The Standard Minimum Rules also take into account the use of firearms.
Discussion point:
What means do you think are available to prevent ill-treatment, excessive use of
force and even torture?
Access: many people from outside coming in all the time and being able to see
every part of the prison and every prisoner.
Rules: a framework of rules within which anything that could lead to serious ill-
treatment, e.g. solitary confinement, use of restraints, is regulated; a system for
checking that the rules are kept and disincentives for those found not keeping the
rules, e.g. by not having them promoted.
Commitment: a clear lead from the top on the ethical framework within which
detaining people is done.
x Physical security
x Procedural security
x Dynamic security
x Use of force
x Use of firearms
2. Do you think that there are any differences when compared to the
International Standards and Norms – both higher level of provision
and shortfalls?
SESSION 8
Slide 1 – TITLE
Duration:
2 Hours
Purpose:
The purpose of this section is to give an overview of healthcare rights that prisoners
have and of the role all prison staff have in contributing to healthy prisons.
Key points:
x High standards of physical and mental health are rights of all prisoners.
x Access to the countries available health services should be free.
x Only medically qualified persons should make decisions regarding prisoner’s
health.
x No prisoner should be subjected to experimentation, either scientific or
medical, which is detrimental to his or her health.
Physical and mental health of prisoners is one of the most important aspects of life in
prison.
Discussion point:
Why do you think this is the case? What issues do you think are relevant to the
healthcare given to prisoners?
Healthcare affects how people live, work and behave. This has particular
significance in the case of prison staff and prisoners.
By its nature the condition of imprisonment can have a damaging effect on both the
physical and mental wellbeing of prisoners. Prison administrations have a
responsibility, therefore, not simply to provide medical care but also to establish
conditions that promote the wellbeing of both prisoners and prison staff. Prisoners
should not leave prison in a worse condition than when they entered.
Prisoners often arrive in prison with pre-existing health problems. Prisoners often
come from the poorest sections of society and their health problems will reflect this.
They will bring with them untreated conditions, addictions and also mental health
problems. These prisoners will need particular support, as will those many others
whose mental health may be significantly and adversely affected by the fact of
imprisonment.
The right to health is a basic human right. Article 12, paragraph 1, of the
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights highlights:
And the Universal declaration of Human Rights, Article 25, states that:
‘Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and
well-being of himself and his family... including... medical care and
necessary social services.’ (Article 25)
Discussion point:
What are these safeguards? What additional heath care rights might prisoners
have?
Just because a person is in prison, they should not be subjected to a lower standard
of health care than that provided in society. The State takes on a responsibility to
provide sufficient health care when it deprives a person of their liberty. It is not
tolerable for imprisonment to add sickness, physical or mental suffering to the
punishment.
The State’s responsibility is perhaps even greater when considering that the situation
of imprisonment in itself, to a greater or lesser extent, is damaging to people’s
physical and mental health.
It is often asked what the standard of health care in prison should be. Principle 9 of
the Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners states that:
The government has full responsibility for imprisoned people who are placed under
its authority, thus the quality should be as good as it can be.
It is not for anyone to judge whether a prisoner ‘deserves’ health care or not.
Examination on admission
Principle 24 of the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under
Any Form of Detention of Imprisonment states that:
Discussion point:
Can you remember the reasons why prisoners should be medically examined on
admission?
There are several important reasons why prisoners should be offered medical
examinations when they first arrive in prison:
Also, as it is not always possible to ensure that a doctor is able to carry out a medical
examination of all prisoners as soon as they are admitted to prison, they should at
least be seen by a qualified nurse who can report any concerns.
As part of the admissions procedure too, prisoners should receive clear information
on the arrangements for healthcare in prison.
Principle 24 of the Body of Principles also requires that medical care has to be
provided free of charge. It is an important principle of prison health care that all
necessary medical care and treatment should be provided free of charge. This may
be a particular problem when there are increasing numbers of long-term prisoners
who require expensive treatment for complex or terminal conditions.
Prison administrations will need to ensure that they make suitable arrangements
which are based on the needs of prisoners and that the required treatment is not
restricted on the grounds that it is deemed to be too expensive merely because the
patient is a prisoner.
In all aspects of health care prison authorities should seek to establish and maintain
close links with health service providers outside the prison.
Discussion point:
Why do you think that there should be close links between prison and community
healthcare provision?
This will not only allow for a continuity of treatment but will also enable professional
standards and in training for medical personnel.
Individual Treatment
An important point is that any medical judgements and treatments should be based
on the needs of the individual prisoner and not on the needs of the administration.
‘The medical services of the institution shall seek to detect and shall
treat any physical or mental illnesses or defects which may hamper a
prisoner’s rehabilitation. All necessary medical, surgical and psychiatric
services shall be provided to that end.’ (Rule 62)
Prisons should make sure that prisoners who are sick or who are concerned about
their health have access every day to a qualified medical officer, and privacy should
be ensured.
The conditions under which prisoners are interviewed about their health should be
the equivalent of those which apply in civil medical practice – it is unacceptable for
consultation to take place with groups of other prisoners around.
There is a right to confidentiality too, which requires that prisoners should not have to
submit their requests for access to the doctor to other prison staff – they should
never have to disclose their reasons for seeking a consultation.
Discussion point:
Can you think of any circumstances where there may be possible tensions
between the prisoners’ medical and health needs and the interests of the broader
prison community and prison administration?
In some countries prisoners who are terminally ill may be released early from their
sentences. Any diagnosis made or advice offered should be based on professional
judgement and the best interests of the prisoner. It will be for the prison authorities to
consider and assess any risks posed by the early release of such prisoners.
Special provisions need to be made too for prisoners who are drug dependant and
are in the process of withdrawal.
In many prison systems a significant proportion of prisoners suffer from some form of
mental illness. Prisoners who are insane should not be in prison.
(1) Persons who are found to be insane shall not be detained in prisons
and arrangements shall be made to remove them to mental institutions
as soon as possible.
(2) Prisoners who suffer from other mental diseases or abnormalities shall
be observed and treated in specialised institutions under medical
management.
(3) During their stay in a prison, such prisoners shall be placed under the
special supervision of a medical officer.
(4) The medical or psychiatric service of the penal institutions shall provide
for the psychiatric treatment of all other prisoners who are in need of
such treatment. (Rule 82)
When a prisoner is diagnosed as mentally ill they should not be held in prison and
the prison authorities should make every effort to have them transferred to a
psychiatric facility.
While they remain in prison they will require special care. It is particularly important
in the case of prisoners who are receiving psychiatric treatment that arrangements
should be made for their continuing care after they are released.
Prison Doctor
Each prison should have sufficient qualified health care specialists, the primary
responsibility of whom is to look after the health care of the prisoners.
There should be at least one qualified medical officer, as specified by Rule 22 (1) of
the Standard Minimum Rules:
‘At every institution there shall be available the services of at least one
qualified medical officer who should have some knowledge of
psychiatry. The medical services should be organised in close
relationship to the general health administration of the community or
nation. They shall include a psychiatric service for the diagnosis and, in
proper cases, the treatment of states of mental abnormality.’(Rule
22(1))
There is a reason the rules specify a close relationship to the health administration of
the community; it is a good way to ensure that a prison has enough qualified medical
staff. All health care staff should be qualified to at least the same level as would be
required for similar posts outside the prison. Similarly, their salaries and conditions of
employment should be to a similar standard.
The rules also call for a qualified dentist. Rule 22 (3) states that:
The prison doctor has three crucial roles set out in the Standard Minimum Rules:
Discussion point:
The most general guideline for the medical officer is Rule 25 (1) of the Standard
Minimum Rules which states that:
‘The medical officer shall have the care of the physical and mental
health of the prisoners and should daily see all sick prisoners, all who
complain of illness, and any prisoner to whom his attention is specially
directed.’(Rule 25(1))
The implication of this rule is that the medical officer is qualified, and has at their
disposal a well-equipped surgery and treatment room, and is prepared to treat
prisoners on the same basis as other patients.
Again it is important to remember that doctors are in prison because they are
doctors, and they are to act like doctors – only in the interests of prisoners, without
interference.
The most important international provisions dealing with the responsibilities and roles
of the prison health-care personnel are the Principle of Medical Ethics relevant to
the Role of Health Personnel, particularly Physicians, in the Protection of
Prisoners and Detainees against torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
Ultimately it provides that the medical officer must be particularly careful not to be
involved in any way in the disciplining or punishment of prisoners, or in restraining a
prisoner for any reason other than a medical one.
What must be avoided at the very least is involvement of a prison doctor in security
or disciplinary matters of any kind. A prison doctor is not part of the prison
management
Qualified nurses should be present just as much in prisons without a hospital unit,
particularly if a doctor’s services are limited – They can fulfil an important role by
compensating for the doctor. The Code for Nurses reads:
Slide 16 - NURSES
In some countries, prison officers are trained to act as medical first aid officers, often
referred to as health workers, to ensure that immediate help is available when
required.
Health workers can play a valuable role in prisoners, provided they are trained well
and function under the supervision of the prison doctor, and perhaps assisted by a
nurse.
Discussion point:
Following on from this, it is clear that the health of prisoners is not just the
responsibility of the prison administration and health officers, but also of prison staff.
Every member of the prison staff should ensure that prisoners’ health rights and
entitlements are enforced.
Article 6 of the UN Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials states that:
Slide 17 - RESPONSIBILITY OF ALL STAFF
All prison staff need to have an understanding of basic health matters. Very often
when an incident occurs in prison in which someone needs immediate first aid it will
be non health care staff who will be first on the scene and who will be required to
administer immediate care.
Also, Additional training and education are necessary periodically to keep staff and
prisoners up to date on the latest health problems, such as drug abuse, HIV/AIDS,
tuberculosis and other transmissible diseases.
Every request of a prisoner to see a doctor should be taken very seriously answered
and agreed to promptly, unless this request is obviously faked. In case of doubt, the
request should be granted. If afterwards it was deemed to be wilful misuse,
appropriate disciplinary sanctions should be taken, but a new request to see a doctor
should never be refused because of an earlier misuse.
In addition to meeting the needs of prisoners who are ill, prison administrations are
also responsible for ensuring that the conditions of imprisonment do not adversely
affect physical and mental health. We covered this briefly in Session 3.
The conditions under which prisoners are detained will have a major impact on their
health and well-being. In order to meet their responsibilities therefore, prison
administrations should ensure appropriate standards in all those areas that may
affect the health and hygiene of prisoners.
Discussion point:
What areas of a prison may have an impact on the health and hygiene of staff
and prisoners?
The physical conditions of the accommodation, the food and the arrangements for
hygiene and sanitation should all be designed in such a way as to help those who
are unwell to recover and to prevent the spread of infection to the healthy.
The medical officer has a responsibility for the health of the prison as well as the
health of individual prisoners:
‘The medical officer shall regularly inspect and advise the director upon:
The other roles and responsibilities of the medical officer will be covered later.
Overcrowding and a lack of resources can be a problem faced by many prisons, and
provide an obstacle to achieving healthy prison conditions.
The amount of space available to each prison and access to natural light and fresh
air will all have a significant impact on the spread of infectious diseases and on the
mental state of prisoners. Rule 10 of the Standard Minimum Rules pay attention to
this:
Medical Conditions
Transmissible Diseases
As previously mentioned, transmissible diseases are a big problem for prison
administrations. Measures taken are very different in different countries.
Decisions about these matters must not be based on irrational opinions of prisoners,
staff or the public. The basic starting point should be the respect of a person’s
integrity and dignity and trust in a doctor’s medical judgement.
The first recommendable solution is to inform prisoners and staff about diseases, the
real risks of infection and how to avoid them.
Discussion point:
Measures to reduce risks have been introduced in prisons in some countries – for
example, making condoms available and even syringes for drug users. Do you
think that this is appropriate?
Suicide
In prison self-mutilation and suicidal efforts occur. They happen generally because of
mental, social or cultural problems. They should be dealt with carefully, sensitively
and individually – certainly not routinely or disciplinarily.
Discussion point:
What action do you think the prison administration should take to prevent suicide
and self harm?
Often the measure taken to prevent a prisoner harming themselves is isolation, but
this is exactly the opposite of what is needed. Care and contact should be the first
response. Training staff about reasons for suicide attempts, identifying symptoms
and establishing strategies to support vulnerable prisoners are essential.
Refusal to Eat
A refusal to eat is frequently a protest, not a suicide attempt. When this is the case it
is not a medical problem, but a political or social problem. The World Medical
Association’s Declaration on Hunger-Strikes states that, regarding a doctors
intervention or not, that:
Slide 20 - HUNGER STRIKES
Discussion point:
Do you think that the State should force-feed a prisoner on hunger strike? Or
should the prisoner be able to die if he wants to? Should the mental condition of
the prisoner be the key factor?
Slide 1 - TITLE
Duration:
2 Hours
Purpose of session:
To reinforce the principle that despite being deprived of liberty, prisoners retain a
right to have contact with their family and friends and the outside world.
Key Points:
x All prisoners have the right to communicate with the outside world, especially
with their families.
x No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his or her privacy,
family, home or correspondence.
x Foreign Prisoners should be allowed to communicate with their diplomatic
representatives.
x A prisoner’s request to be held in a prison near his or her home shall be
granted as far as possible.
x Prisoners shall be kept informed of important items of news.
Retained Rights
The very idea of imprisonment implies that the interaction and communication of
inmates with the outside world is seriously reduced. However, general human rights
to interaction and communication are not abrogated by the fact of imprisonment.
Discussion point:
What limits, if any, should be placed on a prisoners’ right to maintain contact with
society?
The principle that prisoners retain, within certain limits, human rights and freedoms,
is connected to the idea that prisoners generally return to society and should
reintegrate as normal citizens. Therefore contacts with the outside world are an
essential part of the prisoners’ reintegration into society.
This idea is most clearly spelled out in Rule 61 (1) of the SMR, where it says:
There are five basic ways in which contact with can be maintained with the outside
world that are covered by this session:
x Letters
x Visits
x Telephone
x Inmate Leave
x Books, Newspapers and the Internet
Outside Contacts
There are different types of outside contact: contacts with family and friends,
professional and institutional contacts; and contacts with others such as the media.
Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, says that no one shall
be
Contact with family is made explicit in Principle 19 of the Body of Principles for
the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention of Imprisonment,
which states that:
Family contact may be even more important inside prison as on the outside. Very
often, near relatives will be the only ones to keep in touch with an offender over long
stretches of imprisonment.
Contact with family is also explicit in Standard Minimum Rules 37 and 92:
‘An untried prisoner shall … shall be given all reasonable facilities for
communicating with his family and friends, and for receiving visits
from them, subject only to such restrictions and supervision as are
necessary in the interests of the administration of Justice and of
security and good order of the institution’. (Rule 92)
It is well known that to be separated from one’s family and friends is among the most
acute pains of imprisonment, but furthermore there is the notion that links with the
family (and the wider community) constitutes the most solid basis for social
reintegration.
Many prisoners are unmarried, divorced or separated from their partners. In other
cases, the prisoner may not wish to have contact with relatives. Therefore, the
language of the rules must not be construed too narrowly.
Discussion point:
Any contact with the outside world is likely to raise some security concerns. It is
important, therefore, to find ways in which appropriate levels of contact can be
maintained without jeopardising security. This will usually be possible, provided that
staff understand that both security and contact with the outside world are equally
important elements in their difficult task.
The Standard Minimum Rules make it a right of the individual prisoners themselves
to pass on the information of his or her imprisonment:
‘Every prisoner shall have the right to inform at once his family of his
imprisonment or his transfer to another institution’. (Rule 44 (3))
The importance of maintaining links with family members and friends has
implications first of all for the placement of prisoners. If prisoners are placed a long
distance from their homes, this makes visiting (as well as home leaves) more
strenuous as well as more costly.
Discussion point:
Given the current situation in Palestine, how realistic do you think that it is to keep
prisoners near their home?
In many systems such a transfer may be particularly difficult with respect to female
prisoners, since the few women’s prisons may not be in the right places. If, on the
other hand, a permanent placement near home is not feasible, temporary transfer for
visiting purposes is a helpful practice.
In the case of foreign prisoners, the implication is that they should, if possible, be
able to serve the sentence in their home country (Model Agreement on the
Transfer of Foreign Prisoners, adopted by the Seventh UN Crime Congress,
1985).
x Letters
x Telephone calls
x Visits
Letters
Traditionally, there have been rather restrictive regulations in this area. If all letters
are to be read and censored by prison staff, delays in the flow of letters has to be
kept at a minimum.
Discussion point:
Do you think that reading letters is a breach of the Right to Privacy? Is it ever
justifiable to read correspondence? On what grounds can the censoring of
prisoners’ correspondence be justified? When is it necessary? What special
arrangements can be made for prisoners who cannot read or write?
It is now generally accepted that only in extreme cases such censorship represents a
“reasonable condition and restriction” as mentioned by Principle 19 of the Body
of Principles.
In some systems, only incoming letters are checked. If the goal is to prevent
contraband from entering the prison, the letters need not be read, but only checked
for illegal enclosures. Good practice requires this to be done in the presence of the
prisoner, in order to avoid any appearance of invading the prisoner’s privacy.
Telephone calls can be an important means for prisoners to maintain contact with
their family and friends. Telephone communication should therefore be treated very
much like correspondence, particularly when matters need to be dealt with urgently.
The possibility to talk over the phone is, of course, of particular importance for those
prisoners who do not know how to read and/or write. Also, if prisoners’ families and
friends live far away from the place of imprisonment, visits are more difficult and
telephone calls can serve as a substitute.
Do you think that monitoring telephone calls is a breach of the Right to Privacy?
Is it ever justifiable to monitor telephone calls?
It may be necessary for some prisoners to make and receive calls from an office
under the supervision of a member of staff. In cases of emergency, prisoners should
be allowed to use official telephones under the appropriate supervision.
Visits
Visits are a more powerful medium of external social relations than letters or
telephone conversation.
Discussion point:
What action can be taken to ensure that prisoners receive regular visits from their
family and friends?
The international norm is that they should allow for physical contact. Physically
separating visitors should be resorted to only in exceptional situations.
Where prisoners are not allowed out, visits are the most obvious opportunity to
smuggle drugs, alcohol, money and arms into prisons. In practice this means that a
balance has to be struck between providing humane and welcoming arrangements
for visits and the need for supervision.
Discussion point:
What are some of the security issues connected with visits? How the risks be
minimised and at the same time comply with international norms on Human
Rights?
The right of a prisoner to be visited by his or her family should not be removed for
disciplinary reasons. It may sometimes be necessary, however, to limit the
conditions in which visits take place. For example, if there is proof of a previous
attempt to smuggle goods into the prison during a visit, the prisoner or visitor
involved may be required to have future visits without future contact
It is a good practice in some prison systems to allow longer visiting hours if the
visitors have to travel a long distance. Sometimes, even special rooms, houses,
trailers etc. are provided for the prisoners to meet their long-term visitors in an
atmosphere that allows for more privacy and intimacy. This is particularly important
for visits with all the family, including children.
Intimate Visits
In some prison systems, sexual contact between prisoners and their visitors is
discouraged but in other systems such contact is tolerated.
In still others they are openly allowed – for example in some countries there are also
bedrooms set aside for conjugal visits where couples may stay for between four
hours and a night. The intimacy of these visits can be seen as the most likely way to
maintain a relationship during the imprisonment of one of the parties and therefore
enable prisoners to exercise their right to family life.
While this system is usually referred to as “conjugal visits”, making it seem like a
privilege of married prisoners, it is often extended to unmarried couples of whatever
sex – the eligibility for conjugal visits must be clear and unambiguous.
Discussion point:
Prison Leave
The most natural way of enhancing a prisoners’ contact with the outside world is by
way of prison leave (home leave, furloughs etc.). If the prisoner can periodically go
home, this can at least alleviate some of the problems that are caused by
imprisonment itself (including the sexual and relation problems of prisoners and their
partners).
If possible home leaves should be granted on a regular, periodic basis and to clearly
defined groups of prisoners. If it is granted as a privilege, by rather arbitrary
decisions and as a reward of good conduct, it not only devalues home leaves as a
means of maintaining family ties and social contacts, but also may cause feelings of
unfair treatment.
Discussion point:
We will now go on to look at contact with others outside of the prison such as
lawyers, religious representatives, public bodies and diplomatic representatives.
Contact with a lawyer can be of utmost importance in a situation of imprisonment.
Such contact needs to be unobstructed and confidential. The Standard Minimum
Rules have recognised this fact as far as prisoners under arrest or awaiting trial are
concerned:
This more encompassing nature of contact with lawyers has been recognized by
Principle 18 of the Body of Principles for the Protection of all Persons under
any form of Detention or Imprisonment.
Discussion point:
Much of what has been said about contacts with lawyers applies equally to contacts
with representatives of a religion or an ethical society.
The right to privileged contact with religious representatives is made explicit and
elaborated upon in the Standard Minimum Rules:
The rules do not mention the conditions under which visits by religious
representatives are to be conducted.
Discussion point:
Do you think that communication with members of the administration; the courts,
the legislature or parliament should be privileged?
This is good practice since it permits prisoners to vent their grievances without fear
of reprisal by prison officials. The same should apply to contact with international
organisations, notably with the UN Human Rights Commission and other human
rights bodies.
In the spirit of the guiding principles of the SMR, notably Rule 61, efforts should be
made to encourage and facilitate contacts of prisoners with probation or
rehabilitation bodies and other community agencies, which are:
Not all prisoners will want the diplomatic representatives of their country to know
about the fact of their imprisonment. It is therefore good practice for the prison
administration not to volunteer information about a person’s imprisonment without
the person’s consent.
Prison authorities should primarily inform prisoners about their rights under Rule 38
and under the Vienna Convention. This includes the right to contact their
embassies and/or consulates.
It should be mentioned that the international Red Cross (ICRC) has a responsibility
to assist foreign prisoners in countries where these prisoners have no permanent
diplomatic or consular representation, where the ICRC is requested as a neutral
intermediary and where the ICRC has a permanent delegation or has regular access
to those countries.
Media Contact
Direct human contact is the most important but by far not the only outside contact
prisoners are entitled to
'receive and impart information and ideas through any media' (Article
19).
The freedom of opinion, expression and information is even more forcefully stated in
Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:
Do you think that prisoners should be permitted to give interviews, write to the
media and publish books/articles whilst in prison?
The SMR use comparatively restrictive language in relation to accesing the media:
It is good practice to allow prisoners, as a rule, complete access to all media that are
legally available outside prison.
Exceptions to this rule should be limited to reasons of safe custody, i.e. material
which would facilitate escape from custody or insurrection inside the prison.
From this starting point, Rule 39 appears as an additional obligation of the prison
administration to provide access to “the more important items of news” even to
those prisoners who are for some reasons unable to get this information on their
own.
The most important newspapers and other periodicals should be available at the
prison library.
Discussion point:
Should there be any restrictions on what prisoners can access? For example,
should they be able to purchase pornographic magazines and extremist political
papers .
In countries where radios and/or TV sets are normal equipment in most households,
the principle of normalcy will speak in favour of allowing prisoners to have their own
radio/TV sets in their rooms or cells, as well as in communal areas.
x Letters
x Visits
x Telephone
x Intimate leave
2. Do you think that there are any differences when compared to the
international standards and norms – both higher level of provision and
shortfalls?
3. Are the provisions in the law fully and effectively implemented? If not,
what could be done to ensure compliance?
SESSION 10
Slide 1 - TITLE
Duration:
1 Hour
Purpose:
The purpose of this session is to highlight that complaints, grievance and request
procedures must be drawn up in such a way that they can be understood and
accepted both by prisoners and by those responsible for the administration process.
Key Points
x Every prison should have the right to make a complaint regarding his or her
treatment and, unless the complaint is evidently frivolous, to have it dealt with
promptly and, if requested, confidentially. If necessary, the complaint may be
lodged on behalf of the prisoner by his or her legal representative or family.
Discussion point:
‘Every prisoner shall have the opportunity each week day of making
requests or complaints to the director of the institution or the officer
authorized to represent him.’ (Rule 36(1))
Discussion point:
What sort of issues do you think that it would be worthwhile to consult prisoners
on?
Understandable Procedures:
The objective of good prison management should be, as far as possible, to prevent
serious complaints from arising in the first place. One way of achieving this is having
and adhering to a very clear set of procedures covering all aspects of the daily life of
the prison.
Discussion point:
No procedures are in place that might deter prisoners from raising legitimate
complaints and grievances. The disciplinary procedures should not contain any
regulations that make it difficult for prisoners to complain, such as punishing them for
making allegations against staff that turn out to be unfounded.
Often prisoners are also discouraged from complaining against prison staff and
administration for fear of reprisals from the staff.
Body of Principles
Many complaints are likely to be about issues concerning daily routine or treatment.
Matters that will be of little importance to people in normal society can take on great
significance in the highly disciplined prison world, in which there are likely to be
regulations affecting almost every aspect of daily life.
One of the main objectives of the prison administration should be to prevent a simple
request from developing into a complaint, or a complaint developing into a formal
grievance, or a grievance developing into an appeal to a higher body.
The best way of achieving this is by having good relationships between staff and the
prisoners they deal with. Not every complaint by prisoners will need a formal
consideration and response – In practice, prison staff will be able to listen and
respond to most complaints by prisoners over the course of their routine duties
without the need to put the complaint forward for formal consideration.
Discussion point:
What types of complaint do you think could be dealt informally by prison staff
exercising their discretion?
It is not possible to resolve all requests and complaints in this informal manner. In
addition, each prisoner system needs to have a formal procedure for dealing with
requests and complaints that cannot be resolved informally or between individuals.
On each working day the prison director or senior member of staff should consider
all such approaches from prisoners.
Wherever possible the prisoner should be allowed to make the request or complaint
in person.
If the volume of requests makes this impossible, arrangements should be made for it
to be submitted in writing.
Regardless of whether the request is submitted orally or in writing the prison should
make a formal written record of the request and of the response to it.
If the director of the prison rejects the complaint, or if it is being made against the
director, the prisoner should be able to make a written application to a more senior
person in the prison administration, usually at regional or national headquarters.
In the interests of justice and fairness it is important that a complaint being made
against an individual member of staff should not have to be channeled though that
person. For this reason, there should be a procedure that allows prisoners to submit
confidential requests and complaints to higher authority.
Discussion point:
For example, the prison administration can refer foreign prisoner to local charities
and humanitarian organizations which may be able to provide counseling and
support through visits and similar forms of contact.
The general procedure should indicate how many days it will normally take to give a
response. If the request is a complicated one that cannot be resolved in the normal
time, the prisoner should be told how long it would take.
Discussion point:
Areas of Complaint:
There are at least five main possible areas for complaint by a prisoner:
Discussion point:
Sometimes prisoners will allege that either members of staff or other prisoners have
engaged in activities that contravene criminal law.
Although prison officials typically have powers to investigate and punish disciplinary
offences by both staff and prisoners, they do not normally have any powers in the
field of criminal investigation or prosecution.
Nor do they have powers to decide whether there should be an investigation into or a
prosecution of allegations of behaviour that is contrary to criminal law.
There are a number of circumstances in which prisoners may claim that officials
have exercised inadequate care in managing prisons and that, as a consequence,
they have a legitimate claim to civil damages.
Claims could include health and safety regulations, hygiene or protection from
dangerous prisoners.
Meals can be badly cooked or cold; prison staff can be rude or insensitive; property
can be lost; there can be delays in visits or correspondence; and so on.
Very often, all that is sought by the prisoner is the recognition by someone in
authority that things have gone wrong and an apology. Prison officials need to
ensure that such complaints are given proper consideration and that investigations
which arise out of them are thorough and frank.
Inadequate investigation of minor but justified complaints often leads to a far greater
level of grievance than that which arose from the original complaint.
While it is often the case that judicial investigation of such complaints will not be
merited, the underlying principle is that the prison authorities should not seek to
prejudge the issue and should allow unhindered access to legal advice.
Not surprisingly, prisoners are liable frequently to seek recourse to a more senior
authority when the content of an official response to a request or complaint is not the
one they wanted. The same conditions apply to such appeals as to complaints about
poor practice.
The procedure for disciplinary hearings and punishment was dealt with in Session 6.
Prisoners who feel that they proper procedures were not followed in their case - or
who feel that they have been punished unjustly - should have the right of appeal to a
higher authority.
As Principle 33 (2) of the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons
under Any Form of Detention explains in detail:
x Requests
x Complaints
x Grievances
2. Do you think that there are any differences when compared to the
international standards and norms – both higher level of provision and
shortfalls?
3. Are the provisions in the law fully and effectively implemented? If not,
what could be done to ensure compliance?
SESSION 11
Slide 1 - TITLE
Duration:
2 Hours
Purpose:
Everything in the preceding Sessions apply to all prisoners in general terms, but
there are certain categories of prisoners who need special consideration because of
their legal status, age, gender, race or sentence type. The objective of the next two
sessions is to underline what these considerations are.
Key Point:
‘Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this
Declaration without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex,
language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin,
property, birth or other status.’ (Article 2)
Similarly, Principle 5 of the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons
under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment states that:
Slide 4 - NO DISCRIMINATION
Body of Principles
Thus, it is important to remember that all persons are equal before the law and are
entitled, without discrimination, to equal protection of the law.
Because some people are different from each other, some individuals need special
protection to ensure their equal treatment.
While prison should only be used when it is necessary for all persons, there is a
greater risk and there are more potentially damaging effects of imprisoning these
individuals. Therefore their detention must be carried out with extreme caution and
care to ensure the protection of their human rights.
Discussion point:
Can you name groups of prisoners who may need special consideration and
requirements?
The prisoners who may require special consideration can be grouped into:
x Gender (females)
x Religion
x Race
The first special category of prisoners we are going to consider are pre-trial
prisoners.
Discussion point:
What do you think are the special considerations that apply to pre-trial detainees?
Pre-trial prisoners have the right to different treatment in some respects from
convicted prisoners because they have not been found guilty of any offence and are
by law presumed to be innocent of the offence with which they have been charged.
The international instruments highlight the need to separate pre-trial prisoners from
convicted prisoners. Article 10 (2) of the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights states that:
And
Rules 8 and 85 of the Standard Minimum Rules.
The reason for this separation is to ensure that the treatment of pre-trial prisoners is
appropriate to the presumption of innocence. They are not convicted people and
should not be kept in a place where the ethos is that of containing people who have
been given a prison sentence.
The main preoccupation of pre-trial prisoners would normally be their impending trial
and making adequate preparations for it.
Different expectations would apply to the daily routine and regime for convicted
prisoners.
Discussion point:
Pre-trial prisoners have a number or rights – to see lawyers, to have food brought in,
to wear their own clothes, not to be required to work – which do not apply in the
same way to convicted prisoners, and mixing the two would cause difficulties.
These rights of pre-trial prisoners are highlighted by the Standard Minimum Rules.
The right to have food brought in, if they so desire, is covered by Rule 87:
‘Within the limits compatible with the good order of the institution,
untried prisoners may, if they so desire, have their food procured at
their own expense from the outside, either through the administration
or though their family or friends. Otherwise, the administration shall
provide their food.’ (Rule 87)
If pre-trial prisoners are allowed to wear their own clothes, appropriate washing
arrangements should be made. If this cannot be done inside the prison, another
option is to allow prisoners to exchange personal clothing at visits.
Rule 89 discusses the pre-trial prisoner not being forced to work:
In terms of healthcare, in addition to the rights of all prisoners, Rule 91 states that:
Discussion point:
Do you think that this is appropriate and in line with the international standards we
spoke about earlier in the week? Why do you think that no distinction is made?
This means that prisoners who may be facing relatively minor charges are held in the
same conditions of security as though facing serious charges. Consideration should
be given to the appropriate degree of security for different groups of pre-trial
prisoners.
In order to receive a fair trial it is particularly important that pre-trial prisoners are
able to keep in contact with legal advisors, family and friends to as to prepare their
defence properly and without undue hindrance.
Access to legal representation is highlighted by the Standard Minimum Rules, Rule
93 states that:
Their right and access to legal representation is very important, especially if they are
waiting for trial. There should be no interference from the prison authority, or
censorship of correspondence. As the Standard Minimum Rules state, discussion
between the prisoner and the legal representative should never be overheard by the
prison authority.
JUVENILES
I want to move on now to consider another group of prisoners who require special
considerations – Juveniles.
Discussion point:
What do you think are the special considerations that apply to juveniles in
detention?
To begin, the most important principle to remember regarding juvenile prisoners is
that they are entitled to not only all the human rights protections given to adults, but
they should also receive additional services and protections due to their immaturity
and vulnerability.
The definition of who is a juvenile or child can vary from country to country, and there
are different definitions in law between countries at what age a child may be
imprisoned in the prison system.
Slide 14 - DEFINITIONS
‘A juvenile is every person under the age of 18.’(Rule 11a UN Rules for the
Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty)
This is reinforced by Rule 11 (a) of the UN Rules for the Protection of Juveniles
Deprived of their Liberty:
The fundamental consideration here is that the imprisonment of young people should
be avoided whenever it can be, and the younger the person is, the greater the need
should be to avoid detention.
Young people are in their formative years, learning and developing into adults. If
these years are spent in an institution for those who have broken the law, there is a
danger that the young person will absorb a criminal identity and grow up leading a
life of crime.
There is also a danger of abuse, exploitation and health risks for juveniles in
detention.
These are enshrined in particular international rules relating to juveniles, the main
ones being:
x UN Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty (also known
as the Riyadh Guidelines)
Discussion point:
The detention of juveniles pending trial shall be used only as a measure of last resort
and for the shortest possible period of time. Prison officials should make every effort
to ensure that juveniles are not being held without having their cases adjudicated.
They should have regular contact with judges, prosecutor (phone, visits, reports) in
charge with the case. They should ensure that every child have the right of legal
counsel and be enabled to apply for free legal aid, where such aid is available.
They should also ensure that a judge follow the case of the child and grant
conditional release at the earliest possible time and to the greatest possible extent.
The key principle is that every child deprived of liberty shall be treated with humanity
and respect for the inherent dignity of the human person, and in a manner which
takes into account the needs of person his or her age.
While in custody, juveniles shall receive care, protection and all necessary
individual assistance-social, educational, vocational, psychological, medical
and physical-that they may require in view of their age, sex and personality (Beijing
Rules, Rule 13.5).
In particular, every child deprived of liberty shall be separated from adults unless it
is considered in the child's best interest not to do so (International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights, Article 10.2.b).
If separate facilities are not feasible, every effort should be made to separate the
juvenile section of the prison from the adult section. Experiences around the world
have shown that contact with adult prisoners is dangerous for juveniles: juveniles
housed with adults are more likely to be raped, beaten, exploited and corrupted if
housed with adults.
Juveniles should have little, if any, contact with adult prisoners. Any contact must be
fully supervised by prison staff at all times. Adult prisoners should not work in the
juvenile portion of the prison. However, a young person of 16-18 is not the same as
a child of 12- 14 or 14-16. Age mixing, especially with males - among whom bullying
and victimization - is more prevalent-should be discouraged.
Discussion point:
So what ethos and approach do you think should operate in an institution for
juveniles?
A well designed juvenile detention centre will provide more personalised and better
conditions of detention for young persons deprived of their liberty. It should be of
adequate size, well lit and ventilated, well furnished with regard to sleeping and living
areas. Also, unless there are compelling security reasons, juveniles should be
allowed to keep a reasonable quantity of personal items.
The primary objective of a detention place is not punishment but rehabilitation of the
child in conflict with the law, and care must be taken to prevent long-term social
maladjustment.
The emphasis of any juvenile facility should be on care, protection, education and
vocational skills, and not on confinement.
x Admission
x Healthcare
x Programmes
x Education
x Recreation
x Family contact
x Staff
Admission of juveniles
Discussion point:
What special requirements do you think that there should be when a juvenile is
admitted to an institution?
In every place where juveniles are detained a complete and secure record of
information (identification of the juveniles, fact, reasons and authority for detention
etc…) should be kept and its access should be limited to a very restricted number of
persons.
During the admission in a detention centre, the juvenile should meet with a social
worker and be interviewed. The first and most usual task of the social worker is to
undertake a character study of the juvenile.
Information about the juvenile's personal situation, personality and its social and
family background, the conditions in which he has lived or been brought up, his
schooling… should be gathered. This information is essential to ensure a proper
follow up of the case, facilitate rehabilitation of the child and protect the best interest
of the child in any decision.
The report would also enable the judicial authorities to take any provisional
measures other than detention, and the sentencing authority to determine the most
appropriate measure and/or sanction.
As with adult prisoners, juveniles should be thoroughly screened for health,
psychiatric, emotional, drug and alcohol problems and a proper record should be
kept.
At the time that a juvenile enters the facility, trained prison staff should evaluate the
juvenile's age, criminal record, and criminal file to determine where and with whom
the juvenile should be housed. Juveniles should be classified by age, strength, and
level of aggression (among other categories), and housed accordingly. Violent
juveniles should be separated and should be carefully watched to ensure that they
not harm others.
Healthcare for juveniles
Being under the age of eighteen does not insulate detained juveniles from mental
illness and emotional problems.
In fact, juveniles regularly suffer from various mental health problems, especially
conduct disorder, mood disorders, sleep disorders, psychotic disorders, post-
traumatic stress disorder, and schizophrenia.
Juveniles should be screened and receive treatment for mental health problems.
Every youth facility should have a trained child psychologist on staff.
Discussion point:
Why do you think that these activities are particularly important for juveniles?
A positive self-image is essential to success in almost all areas of life. Young people
are in an especially intensive phase of forming their identities and self-perceptions.
For this reason, improving self-esteem should be an integral part of all programmes
for juveniles in detention. Group activities teaching character-building and interaction
skills, for example, have been shown to be effective in raising young people's self-
esteem.
Once released, efforts should be made to see that juveniles are not stigmatised as
someone with a criminal background.
Education
Education is also crucial to leading a full, responsible, and healthy life at all stages. If
a child does not receive an adequate education, he or she is much more likely to
have a difficult time in life. It may be hard to find meaningful work, for example,
making criminal activity a tempting choice.
All detained juveniles of compulsory school age have the right to education
commensurate with their abilities. If possible, courses can be conducted within
community schools. If courses are taught within the detention facility, juveniles
should attend classes for a full school day.
Juveniles should also receive vocational training that will prepare them to assume
productive employment in the community following their release.
Young female offenders shall not receive less treatment and training than young
male offenders. All national and international standards and laws regarding child
labour are applicable to detained juveniles.
Recreation
Juveniles should also have access to recreational equipment, including balls, cards,
and other games. All recreation time should be carefully supervised by staff in order
to prevent bullying or harassment.
Every effort should be made to help juveniles maintain relationships with their
families.
Discussion point:
Why do you think that family and community contact is particularly important for
juveniles?
Article 37 (c) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child states that a juvenile:
‘Shall have the right to maintain contact with his or her family through
correspondence and visits, save in exceptional circumstances.’ (Article
37(c))
Research suggests that juveniles with family support are more likely to live law-
abating lives after their release.
Juveniles who are cut off from the community are less likely to assimilate into the
mores and expectations of society, including respect for the law. Juveniles who are
isolated from the community are at greater risk of re-offending.
Prison staff should arrange to have members of the community come in regular
contact with detained juveniles via recreational, cultural, educational, or other
programmes. Community volunteers can organize and run cultural, educational,
ministry, and vocational activities.
Such ties can have a beneficial effect on both the juveniles and the volunteers: the
juveniles maintain relationships with the community and its values while the
community is less likely to ostracize the juveniles after they are released from prison.
Care must be taken though to ensure that volunteers coming into the prison have
been carefully vetted – prevent unsuitable people befriending juveniles.
Discussion point:
Prior to their release, juveniles should receive instruction in basic life skills, including
communication and conflict resolution, career skills, and courses on how to live
independently as adults. At the time of their release, most juveniles will have no
experience living alone. Life skills courses could be provided to children in conflict
with the law.
Appointing a case manager can be a helpful way to make sure arrangements have
been made for the juvenile to have a place to live, employment, and other basic
requirements upon release.
Parents or guardian of the child, social worker and any other person having interest
for the child (school director, members of the community etc…) should also be fully
involved in the preparatory release of the child.
If such instruments are used, the prison director should immediately consult medical
personnel.
The presence of weapons does not facilitate communication and positive relationship
between staff and juvenile detainees. In particular Rule 65 of the Beijing Rules
states that:
Staff
Discussion point:
Do you think that there should be any special selection or training for staff
working in juvenile institutions?
Staff are very important in a juvenile facility. There should be a special selection
procedure for staff working with juveniles. They need to be given special training.
Staff members working with juveniles should receive specialized training in child
psychology, child welfare, and international standards regarding the rights of the
child. They should also be trained on suicide prevention, first aid, and HIV/AIDS
awareness. Learning how to recognise and deal with bullying is also particularly
important.
In order to refresh skills, share experience, and renew the motivation of staff working
with juveniles, in-service training should be offered on a regular basis.
Where culturally appropriate juvenile detention centers should have mixed gender
staffing. The presence of both male and female staff can have a beneficial effect in
terms of both the custodial ethos and in fostering a degree of normality in a place of
detention. In addition it allows for appropriate staff to carry out gender sensitive
searches.
x Pre-trial detainees
x Juveniles
2. Do you think that there are any differences when compared to the
International Standards and Norms – both higher level of provision
and shortfalls?
Slide 1 - TITLE
Duration:
2 Hours
Purpose:
Key Points:
WOMEN
Around the world women form a small minority of those imprisoned. The average
number is around 5 percent, although in recent times there has been a steeper rise
in the number of women in prison when compared to the increase in the number of
men.
This small number of women prisoners poses a specific problem for prison
administrators. Since the vast majority or prisoners are men, prison systems tend to
be run with men in mind as the norm.
Discussion point:
Women face a particular problem in prison because of their role in the family. In the
community, women often take responsibility for the family and children.
Imprisonment therefore poses particularly severe problems for them and their
families outside.
The situation of women in prison does not receive a great deal of attention in the
international instruments. The key instruments are:
x UN SMR
The general requirements of non-discrimination and equal treatment are set out
clearly in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women. The convention prohibits any discrimination that denies to women
the same protections and fundamental freedoms in all fields – political, economic,
social, cultural and civil - as are accorded to men.
First of all, Rule 8 (a) of the rules requires that men and women should be kept
separate:
This requirement for separation is given added force by the weight of evidence that
shows that many women in prison have already been victims of physical or sexual
abuse by men or have committed their offences in response to brutality or
exploitation by men.
In the coercive environment of the prison women are particularly vulnerable. They
require special safeguards to ensure that they are no harassed or abused in any
way.
(1) In an institution for both men and women, the part of the institution
set aside for women shall be under the authority of a responsible
woman officer who shall have the custody of the keys of all that part
of the institution.
(2) No male member of staff shall enter the part of the institution set
aside for women unless accompanied by a women officer.
(3) Women prisoners shall be attended and supervised only by women
officers. This does not, however, preclude male members of staff,
particularly doctors and teachers, from carrying out their
professional duties in institutions or parts of institutions set aside for
women. (Rule 53)
When male staff deal with women prisoners, there should always be a female
member of staff present.
A pregnant or nursing mother should only be sent to prison after all other options
have been carefully considered.
Women who come into prison pregnant or as nursing mothers face great problems.
To bring up a baby in prison is far from ideal, even if the prison conditions are
hygienic and suitable. However, to separate a small baby from its mother is a serious
decision to take.
It is clear that pregnant women should receive as high a level of care as is accorded
in society outside. The preference is for babies to be born in an outside hospital.
If babies remain with their mothers in prison, proper care has to be provided.
Discussion point:
If there are babies and young children are living in prisons with their mothers what
special arrangements do you think will be needed?
Where nursing infants are allowed to remain in the institution with their
mothers, provision shall be made for a nursery staffed by qualified
persons, where the infants shall be placed when they are not in the
care of their mothers. (Rule 23(3))
Jurisdictions vary in the rules they make about women prisoners’ babies. Some
countries allow mothers to keep their babies with them until they reach a certain age
– everything from nine months to five years – and then the babies are taken away
and cared for elsewhere.
Whatever the arrangements, it is highly likely that the mother’s relationship with the
child will be damaged by the fact that she is a prisoner. In each case, thought should
be given to the best interests of the child and whether he or she should remain with
the mother or be taken care of by other members of the family.
Special arrangements need to be in place to support mothers who have babies with
them when the time comes for release.
Women prisoners should have access to facilities that are equal to those available to
men.
As far as possible, they should be able to select the sort of work and training from
which they can benefit.
Some women prisoners are likely to be single mothers and will need special support
and training.
Security Searches
The carrying of internal body searches of women is even more problematic and can
cause enormous distress and feelings of humiliation to women prisoners.
Healthcare
Women have specific hygiene needs that should be addressed, including safe
disposal arrangements for bloodstained articles and access to items such as sanitary
towels and tampons.
Discussion point:
What problems do think these could be? What can be done to overcome them?
The stigma that faces many prisoners on release is likely to be experienced even
more acutely by women.
One example is the difficulty that some women face in obtaining permission from the
authorities for their children to be returned to them, since they may be regarded as
“unfit mothers”.
Prison administrations have no responsibility for the imposition of the death penalty,
but they sometimes have to deal with its consequences and implementation –
holding prisoners under sentence of death, sometimes for many years when there
are lengthy appeal procedures or when a State has suspended executions but has
not abolished the death penalty or commuted existing sentences.
Prison administrations are sometimes also responsible for carrying out executions.
These tasks place a heavy burden on the staff that are involved.
The international human rights instruments assert the right to life while making an
exception for the death penalty.
For those countries where the death penalty still applies, the article goes on to say
that it should be imposed:
‘Only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law in force
at the time of the commission of the crime and not contrary to the
provision of the present Covenant and to the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This penalty
can only be carried out pursuant to a final judgement rendered by a
competent court.’
Discussion point:
The period for legal appeal against a sentence of death can sometimes be lengthy.
There is no justification for holding such prisoners in solitary confinement or in an
excessively restricted environment simply because they have been sentenced to
death.
Prison staff must be particularly sensitive when supervising prisoners who are under
sentence of death.
This sensitivity must be extended first to the prisoner, who is awaiting death, but also
to his or her family and to the family of the victim if they have any contact with the
prison.
Prisoners under sentence of death should be allowed to maintain contact with their
family and friends, particularly be means of visits under appropriate conditions, and
must be given every reasonable facility to prepare grounds for an appeal against
sentence.
Some long-term and life-sentence prisoners are likely to be highly dangerous. Some
of them will have committed horrendous crimes and would be a real threat to the
safety of the public if they were to escape.
Managing these prisoners in a manner that is decent and humane - while at the
same time ensuring the safety of other people - is a great challenge to professional
prison management.
Discussion point:
What do you think are the main challenges and issues in managing life and long-
term prisoners?
The most important issues in the management of life and long-term prisoners stem
from the potential damage to the prisoners' mental well-being caused by the length
of sentence or the uncertainty of the release date.
Prison administrators must help prisoners to plan their sentences in such a way as to
maintain their sense of self-worth and avoid the dangers of institutionalization.
There is no reason why the provision of work, education and other activities should
not apply to prisoners serving long, including life, sentences. These prisoners are
more likely to become dislocated from their family and community and will therefore
need more support in the rehabilitation process.
DRUG USERS
One of the key responsibilities of any prison system is to reduce reoffending and
protect the public. Necessarily, this involves the system addressing the underlying
causes of prisoners’ offending behaviour - a key factor of which is individuals’ drugs-
misuse. A high percentage of offenders are addicted to drugs (including alcohol) or
other substances (such as glue or non-prescription medication).
Discussion point:
Medical and psychological assistance, in particular, are extremely important for drug
addicts. Often, prison represents the first opportunity for offenders to have their
drugs-misuse problems addressed in a coherent, structured way.
The demand for drug interventions, therefore, places the prison system under
considerable pressure. Many of those imprisoned will seek to smuggle illegal drugs
into jail during their sentences.
Visits would need to become closed, denying prisoners close physical contact with
families and friends; visitors would need to be subjected to far more intrusive
searches – and this would not comply with human rights legislation.
Even with such oppressive measures in place, since prisons are effectively micro-
communities, the need to admit contractors, receive mail, food and other deliveries
potentially enables drugs to be smuggled in.
x Detoxification
x Reduce SUPPLY of drugs
x Reduce DEMAND for drugs
x Mandatory drug testing
All prison systems should have a drugs strategy, which is either part of a national
drugs strategy or very closely linked to it. The Ministry of Health and the Ministry of
Justice should work closely together to produce such a document. Broadly, the
Strategy should be aimed at:
The range of drug interventions should address the needs of low, moderate and
severe drug-misusing prisoners. The strategy and subsequent policy must be
formulated following consultation with all grades of operational staff, in addition to all
Ministries. Successful delivery of the Strategy will be heavily dependent upon
establishing and maintaining close working partnerships with a range of bodies –
particularly heath services.
For those offenders whose sentence length is short, their engagement should focus
on detoxification and low intensity short duration programmes.
Detoxification services provide clinical support and intervention for drug misusers to
help them achieve withdrawal from drug dependency. Maintenance involves
prescribing drugs for prisoners which may be more appropriate for prisoners who are
in short pre-trial detention or are serving short periods of custody and have been
maintained on methadone in the community.
Clarity is needed in the strategy about whether users admitted to prison should be
sent to hospital for detoxification or whether that is done in the prison.
Either way, they will require psychological support in prison, as the relapse rates are
high.
One of the key actions that has had an impact on both demand and supply of drugs
in prison is Mandatory and voluntary Drug Testing of prisoners. Such a
programme has three main objectives:
x To deter prisoners from misusing drugs - through fear of being caught and
punished,
It is important to remember then, that everyone has the right to freedom of thought,
conscience and religion, and persons from ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities
have the right to their own culture, religion and language.
Discussion point:
In what ways do you think the prison administration can inadvertently discriminate
against minority ethnic groups?
It must be recognized, too, that these differences can create tensions among
prisoners and between prisoners and staff.
Prisons are hierarchical places. Prisoners from minority groups may be at the bottom
of the hierarchy and so become the victims of ill-treatment and abuse.
Rule 41 (3) of the Standard Minimum Rules is important in terms of religion for
minorities:
Most religions have specific practices that have to be observed. These requirements
may involve:
x Ensuring that prisoners have the opportunity to pray at set times and under
certain conditions;
x Dietary restrictions, such as not eating meat, not eating particular meat, or
eating only food prepared under specific conditions;
x Dress requirements or customs about hair length.
A prisoner who does not adequately understand or speak the language used by the
authorities is entitled to receive relevant information promptly in a language that he
understands.
Prisons can be confusing places at the best of times. If the rules of the prison are not
available in languages that all prisoners can understand, some may be penalised for
breaking a rule which they did not know existed.
Prisoners who do not speak the main language of the prison need information in a
language which they understand about prison regulations, what is expected of them
and what their rights are.
Foreign prisoners should be allowed to talk during visits, and to correspond, in their
own language.
Every effort should be made to recruit prison staff from ethnic and religious
minorities, and staff should be given training to help them understand differences
between cultures.
FOREIGN NATIONALS
Although figures relating to the number of prisoners with disabilities worldwide are
scarce, some studies suggest that due to the growing number of people in prison in
most countries, and the increase of older prisoners in some, there is also an
increasing number for people with disabilities in prisons.
Article 14 of the Convention covers a disabled persons right to liberty and security
of person:
1. States Parties shall ensure effective access to justice for all persons
with disabilities on an equal basis with others, including through the
provision of procedural and age-appropriate accommodations, in order
to facilitate their effective role as direct and indirect participants,
including as witnesses, in all legal proceedings, including at
investigative and other preliminary stages.
2. In order to help to ensure effective access to justice for persons with
disabilities, States Parties shall promote appropriate training for those
working in the field of administration of justice, including police and
prison staff. (Article 13)
The difficulties of people with disabilities are magnified in prisons, because of the
nature of the closed and restricted environment, violence from overcrowding and
lack of proper prisoner differentiation amongst other things.
Discussion point:
What special needs do you think that disabled people in prison may have?
The special needs of prisoners with disabilities would depend on the nature of it, but
there are key concerns that are common for all.
The attitude to staff is a key element in ensuring the protection of the human rights of
prisoners with disabilities and reducing discrimination in prison. Prisoners with
disabilities have the same human rights as all other prisoners and they should not be
treated more harshly, isolated or taunted because of their condition. Where it is
possible there should be a member of staff who acts as a contact point for people
with disabilities, and as advisor to the management on their needs.
Prisoners with disabilities may have particular health care needs related to their
disability such as physiotherapy, regular eyesight and hearing examinations and
occupational therapy, some of which might be difficult to meet in prisons.
They also need access to tools and services that enable them to enjoy their human
rights in prisons to the fullest possible extent, such as hearing aids, wheel chairs,
canes and orthotics.
They should also be in accommodation suitable to their needs, while the risk of
abuse by other prisoners should also be taken into account. Adaptations to
accommodation should be made if it is necessary, such as handrails or ramps.
Healthcare should also be easily accessible.
As for programmes and services, all possible measures should be made to ensure
the equal access of prisoners with disabilities to prison activities, from education
programmes to recreation. Cooperation with organisations of civil society is useful to
design and run programmes useful for the needs of prisoners with disabilities.
So, in order to ensure the equal treatment of prisoners with disabilities and the
protection of their human rights, prison authorities need to develop policies and
strategies that address the needs of this vulnerable group in prisons.
x Women prisoners
x Death penalty, life and long term prisoners
x Prisoners belonging to minority ethnic groups
x Foreign prisoners
x Prisoners with disabilities
2. Do you think that there are any differences when compared to the
International Standards and Norms – both higher level of provision
and shortfalls?
Slide 1 - TITLE
Duration:
1.5 Hours
Purpose:
The purpose of this session is to highlight that the prison staff are a critical element
of the prison system. The main task of the prison administration is to hold men and
women deprived of liberty in decent and humane conditions, and that the prison staff
carries out this task.
Key Points:
x Prison staff shall respect and protect human dignity and maintain and uphold
the human rights of all prisoners.
x The conditions of service for prison staff should be adequate to attract and
keep the best candidates.
Importance of Staff:
Discussion point:
Why do you think that the prison staff are the most important feature of any
prison system?
Prison staff must be of a high calibre and carefully selected, because, as Rule 46 (1)
of the Standard Minimum Rules states:
The key challenge for staff and the prison director is to create a relaxed and
constructive prison atmosphere.
The relationship between prisoners is complex and can only indirectly be influenced
by staff. The more difficult prison life is the more prisoners’ ability to survive and to
stand up for themselves will emerge.
Staff who are aware of their duties and responsibilities will do what they can to
maintain satisfactory contact with prisoners and to encourage prisoners to adopt a
tolerant attitude to one another.
Good staff realise that it is in the interests of security to have a situation in which
prisoners are reasonably reconciled to the deprivation of their liberty.
Rule 1 of the Standard Minimum Rules states that the rules are
Discussion point:
Do you think that that the prison system should be part of the ministry of justice or
ministry of interior? What are the arguments for and against each option?
The relevant central authority should use legislation as a basis for the formulation of
Rules that should clearly express a prison’s objective.
Optimal use must be made of the available staff in achieving objectives. This means
that staff must be offered a certain amount of scope to define their own methods,
while still remaining answerable to the director.
Discussion point:
How much discretion do you think prison staff should have in their daily work? Or
should all actions be prescribed in detail in Standing orders?
The various functions within a prison must be clearly defined, with the powers and
obligations of individual members of staff being laid down.
It must also be clear to whom staff are accountable, and who should check on the
performance of duties.
The more highly qualified the staff is, the more professional they will be, and the
more freedom they should be allowed to make their own decisions.
Staff meetings, chaired by a unit head, are necessary if the quality of work is to be
improved. Here information is exchanged with a view to improving relations with
prisoners, making detention a more meaningful experience, identifying the problems
perceived by staff and increasing job satisfaction and safety.
It is the duty of a unit head, if necessary in consultation with his superior, to optimise
staff working conditions and further prisoners’ interests as much as possible.
Role of Director
The role of the prison director is arguably the most important role in the prison
system.
Discussion point:
Do you agree that the prison director is the most important role in the prison
system? Why do you think that the role is so important?
Slide 6 - ROLE OF PRISON DIRECTOR
x to helping them lead law abiding and useful lives in custody and after release
Two capabilities seem crucial for a prison director as they acting in an essentially
hierarchical and rather formally regulated institution, namely:
Discussion point:
What do you think are the most important things that a director should do? How
should they behave?
A director should know how to run an organisation, be well versed in the legal
system, understand how society functions and be aware of the prison’s place in
society. A director also should be conscious of his or her position as a role model.
Subject matters which the director considers important usually will be regarded as
important by the staff, and issues which the director considers unimportant will be
neglected by the staff.
On the one hand, the director should monitor his or her personnel, while on the other
he or she should foster an open attitude which allows staff a degree of creativity in
the performance of their duties.
A director should be a visible figure within the prison, maintaining formal and informal
contacts with his staff.
He or she should listen to problems, and solve them to the best of his or her ability,
while at the same time demonstrating a critical attitude and ensuring that staff do
their work properly.
He or she should keep an eye on the way officers work, and stamp out any abuses.
Prison directors should show a willingness to speak to prisoners, treating them first
and foremost as human beings entitled to respect.
Directors should protect the interests of prisoners in the prison, acting for them in
situations involving the staff or the world outside prison.
In their actions directors should be guided by the notion that it is in the interests of
both prisoners and society to reduce to a minimum the difference between life in
detention and life in society.
Directors should ensure that the organisation’s interests are served in the sense that
they should make every effort to obtain from the central authority such funds as are
necessary to allow the organisation to function properly.
Directors should be aware that they have to account for their prisons’ policy and also
influence national penal policy. This entails enabling the central authority to carry out
inspections, issuing regular policy reports and communicating openly with relevant
bodies outside the prison.
A good prison furthermore maintains open communication with parliament and public
media, who represent the people and the community and who can communicate the
problems, needs, hopes and fears of prisoners and prison.
Prison officers are not merely guards, whose sole task is to deprive people of their
liberty.
They are certainly not vigilantes, whose task is to inflict greater punishment than that
already imposed by the authorities.
Instead, prison officers have to combine a custodial role with an educational and
reformative role. This requires great personal talent and professional skill.
Recruitment
Discussion point:
On the one hand they are expected to maintain a high level of security and safety,
while on the other they must constantly remember that prisoners will sooner or later
be returning to society.
To this end staff should be open and alert, good observers, and prepared to
establish contacts with prisoners. This should be taken into account when selecting
personnel, since it is important for staff not only into be aware of security but to have
an eye for prisoners’ needs.
Individuals who seek to become prison officers with a view to meting out extra
punishment to prisoners do not belong in the system. Prisoners are punished by
imprisonment itself.
The requirements will of course differ in the case of members of staff whose duties
are of a purely clerical nature, or have some other ancillary function. They are simply
required to be competent for their duties, as well as to support in general terms the
establishment’s objectives.
All staff should therefore have an adequate degree of intelligence. This should be
tested in the job interview and where possible in a psychological test. Social skills
are also needed, since these are crucial to the maintenance of the delicate balance
which exists within a prison.
Recruitment and selection procedures should be explicit, clear, scrupulously fair and
non-discriminatory.
Often prisoners from ethnic minorities are overrepresented. Staff with the same
cultural background will be able to have better contacts with prisoners with the same
background. This creates better working conditions for all staff and better
circumstances for many prisoners.
Training
Discussion point:
Rule 85 of the UN Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty
emphasises the focus of training for those dealing with juveniles:
The better staff are trained, the better equipped they are to identify problem and
dangers and take timely measures to reduce risks.
Training and development is not something just to be done at the beginning of one’s
career, as the Standard Minimum Rules make clear:
‘After entering on duty and during their career, the personnel shall
maintain and improve their knowledge and professional capacity by
attending courses of in-service training to be organized at suitable
intervals’. (Rule 47(3))
Use could be made of institutions which provide training for staff of similar
establishments, of academic expertise and of knowledge and experience of senior
colleagues.
Work in a prison makes high demands on staff. And a tense environment takes its
toll. It goes without saying that a job as difficult and demanding as this should be well
paid and that the job can be done in an acceptable number of hours.
Staff should be provided with decent facilities that should not be worse than those for
prisoners. Wherever possible they should have restrooms, somewhere to buy and
eat food, access to sport halls and the library.
Staff should have a contract in which the tasks are described and the number of
working hours is mentioned.
It’s the government’s responsibility to ensure good working conditions. That means
appropriate buildings in acceptable repair, good atmosphere and safe conditions.
Good pay is important for a number of reasons. Well-paid staff will function better,
which will in turn reduce escapes, tension and resistance, and ultimately prisoners
will toe the line.
Staff should have an income which enables them to enjoy a reasonable standard of
living. They should earn enough to prevent them from having to take on extra jobs.
A further aspect of good pay is that it prevents staff from being vulnerable to bribes.
Corruption in an establishment promotes lawlessness, injustice, fear, uncertainty,
insecurity, revolt, and endangers lives. Ultimately, no-one stands to benefit.
Discussion point:
Why do you think that it is important for staff to change their duties on a regular
basis?
The basic aim should be to prevent staff from becoming bored and dispirited with
their jobs, but the system will benefit from the fresh input provided by officers with
experience of a related field of work.
Gender Issues:
The Standard Minimum Rules assume almost complete segregation of the sexes
and set out various safeguards in Rule 53:
(1) In an institution for both men and women, the part of the institution set
aside for women shall be under the authority of a responsible woman
officer who shall have the custody of the keys of all that part of the
institution.
(2) No male member of the staff shall enter the part of the institution set
aside for the women unless accompanied by a woman officer.
(3) Women prisoners shall be attended and supervised only by women
officers. This does not, however, preclude male members of the staff,
particularly doctors and teachers, from carrying out their professional
duties in institutions or parts of institutions set aside for women. (Rule
53)
While this is perhaps appropriate for certain countries, others now regard strict
distinction between the sexes as no longer necessary.
In the latter countries, women have secured a position on the labour market and are
employed in men’s prisons in a number of functions ranging from prison officer to
director.
Discussion point:
What do you think are some of the advantages and disadvantages of employing
both sexes in a prison?
Those countries which employ prison officers of both sexes tend to find the
experience positive. Female prison officers often reduce the level of aggression
shown by male prisoners, as male officers working in a female prison may contribute
to better conditions. Also, the presence of both male and female staff has the
advantage of creating a situation which more closely resembles society at large.
However, the presence of women in a male prison can also create sexual tension.
Female officers can be approached - not only by prisoners but also by male
colleagues - in a sexist way. They can experience sexual harassment, sometimes to
a degree which makes it impossible for them to carry out their work properly. It is the
duty of every member of staff to guard against the type of intimidating behaviour
which seriously affects colleagues in the performance of their duties.
Specialist Staff
Where possible, optimal use should be made of such specialists as are available.
Rule 49 (1) of the Standard Minimum Rules refer to a range of specialists:
The list is certainly not exhaustive, but highlights that a prison could for instance call
upon the services of pastoral workers, librarians, sports instructors, placement
officers, and nurses. These staff, too, should support the organisation’s objectives.
On the one hand, safety and security should be ensured. Specialists should not be
involved in the day-to-day running of a prison, but should be called in when their
services are required. They should, by virtue of their being called, be somewhat
independent of the prison system, a situation which may enable them to win
prisoners’ confidence, without, naturally, breaching security.
Specialists also need to know what they must do and must not do in order to help
staff create and maintain that safety. At times that may lead to tensions between
keeping confidence and issues concerning safety. It is only reasonable that prisoners
be given the chance to consult specialists without interference.
Specialists should regard any information about prisoners they treat as confidential,
only communicating it to members of their own profession, and with the approval of
the prisoner.
x Prison director
x Prison officer
x Conditions of service
x Specialist staff
2. Do you think that there are any differences when compared to the international
standards and norms – both higher level of provision and shortfalls?
3. Are the provisions in the law fully and effectively implemented? If not, what
could be done to ensure compliance?
SESSION 14
Slide 1 - TITLE
Duration:
2 Hours
Purpose of session:
The purpose of this session is to highlight the key themes covered in the
course, to get participants to think about what they will do differently in their
prisons, revisit the course objectives to see if they have been met and to give
participants the opportunity to complete an evaluation form.
x Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of
Detention or Imprisonment
Encourage participants to make use of these tools and refer to them as part of
their work.
x All human beings are equal in dignity and rights, rights that stem from
universal human values.
x All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated at all times with
humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person.
x International human rights law is binding on all States and their agents,
including prison officials.
x Prison staff should know, and be able to apply, international standards
on human rights.
x Adequate food and drinking water are human rights – all prisoners
have the right to food at usual hours, and drinking water whenever
needed.
x All prisoners not allowed to wear their own should be provided with
suitable attire.
x All sentenced prisoners who are medically fit shall be required to work.
As far as possible this shall give them skills for work in the outside
world. Prisoners should be remunerated for the work they do.
x Education and cultural activities shall be provided and encouraged,
including access to an adequate library. Education in prisons should be
aimed at developing the whole person, taking account of a prisoner’s
social, economic and cultural background.
x All prisoners have the right to observe the tenets of their religion and to
have access to a minister of that religion.
x Prisons should be safe environments for all who live and work in them,
and no one in a prison should fear for their physical safety.
x Order and discipline should be firm, but no more than is necessary for
safe custody.
x Prisoners who are subject to disciplinary action should have the right of
appeal to a higher authority.
Slide 8 - SECURITY
x High standards of physical and mental health are rights of all prisoners.
x All prisoners have the right to communicate with the outside world,
especially with their families.
Slide 11 - COMPLAINTS
x Every prison should have the right to make a complaint regarding his or
her treatment and, unless the complaint is evidently frivolous, to have it
dealt with promptly and, if requested, confidentially. If necessary, the
complaint may be lodged on behalf of the prisoner by his or her legal
representative or family.
o Gender (women)
o Age (juveniles, older prisoners)
o Health (mental health, HIV, contagious diseases)
o Religion
o Nationality (foreign prisoners)
o Sexuality (homosexual prisoners)
o Disability (mobility, sight, hearing)
o Status (pre-trial, civil)
And
Discuss with participants whether the learning objectives for the training
course have been achieved.
HANDOUTS
INDEX
“Prisons”
Upon review of the Prisons Law No. (3) for the year 1946 which is in force in
Gaza Governorates, the Prisons Law No. (23) for the year 1952 which is in force
in the West Bank Governorates and the draft law submitted by the Council of
Ministers, and,
Article One
The following words and expressions mentioned in this Law shall have the
meanings assigned thereto hereunder unless the context provides otherwise.
Banned Items: It is every item which is banned from being taken into the
inmate in the Center and covers money, clothes, spirit
drinks, narcotics, poisons, machines, tools, sticks, blades,
knives, weapons of various types, food before testing, every
article which is harmful to the body and life and any article
where the inmate is prohibited from possessing pursuant to
the provisions of this Law, Regulation and Instructions
issued pursuant thereto.
Part Two
Article Two
The Centers shall be established and the locations thereof shall be set by a
decision from the Minister who may cancel them and stop, when necessary, the
utilization thereof.
Article Three
The Centers shall be attached to the Ministry and the Directorate General shall
manage and supervise them. The Director General shall be appointed by a
decision from the Minister. However, the wardens of Centers shall be appointed
by the Director General.
Article Four
The Director of the Center shall manage and run the Center’s activities as well as
execute the provisions of this law or any other regulations or instructions which
are issued pursuant thereto under the supervision of the Director General of the
Reform and Rehabilitation Centers or any other official he authorizes thereof.
Article Five
A numbered general register shall be kept for the inmates and daily book for the
Center’s incidents. A special file shall be established for every inmate. Such
records and files shall be subject to the supervision and control of the Director
who shall be responsible for their organization and fulfilling the particulars
thereof.
Part Three
Acceptance of Inmates
Article Six
1 - The inmate admission into the Center shall be by a legal memo and it is
prohibited to keep him in the Center following the expiry of legally fixed period in
the memorandum.
2 - The Center’s warden should substantiate the inmate’s identity and lawfulness
of the memorandum.
3 - A special file shall be opened in order to record the details pertaining to the
inmate.
Article Seven
1 - The inmate shall be searched upon his entry into the Center and the banned
items with him shall be impounded. The female inmate shall be searched by a
female.
2 - The Center’s warden shall keep the inmate’s money and luggage he brings
with him or which are sent to him vide receipts to be returned to him immediately
upon his release.
3 - The inmate’s money and luggage shall be handed over, in the event of his
death, to his heirs.
4 - The right of the released inmate or his heirs in the event of his death in
claiming his money or luggage shall drop upon the lapse of three years from the
date of release or death and the ownership thereof shall inure to the State if no
one comes forward to receive same during that period.
Article Nine
2 - The inmate’s clothes shall be destroyed if it has been discovered that they are
harmful to public health if the term of his imprisonment is one year or less,
However, if it is more, they shall be handed over to whoever selected by the
inmate.
Part Four
Article Ten
1 - The Ministers of Interior and Justice or whoever either of them delegates shall
have the right of access into any Center for the purpose of inspecting it and
expressing the comments or suggestions they deem proper provided they are
recorded in a special register.
2 - The Minister, in coordination with the Minister of Social Affairs, may appoint
qualified social inspectors and specialists to study the inmate’s psychological and
social condition.
Article Eleven
The Attorney General or his deputies, Governors and Judges of the higher and
central court may, each in his sphere of competence, enter into all places of the
Center at any time to inspect it for the purpose of ascertaining the following:
3 - Apply the stipulations of the laws and by-laws as well as take whatever they
deem necessary in respect of the committed violations.
4 - None presence of an inmate individual without legal aspect.
Article Twelve
The Director General shall make periodical inspection visits to all Centers in order
to ascertain the implementation of all regulations, instructions and decisions as
well as submit his report in this regard to the Minister.
Part Five
Article Thirteen
A clinic shall be set up in every Center and the Medical Services shall provide it
with a physician and a number of nurses, necessary equipment and medicines.
The physician shall carry out the following functions:
1 - Examine every inmate upon his entry into the Center and prior to his release.
He shall prepare a report on his health condition showing therein the date and
hour of preparation of such a report.
3 - Care of the inmates health and submit a periodical report thereon to the
Director comprising his recommendations in this respect.
Article Fourteen
2 - The period spent by the inmate in the hospital shall be calculated from among
the decided period of sentence.
Article Fifteen
1 - The sick inmate shall be immediately referred to the hospital, if his condition
requires so. The Center’s management shall take the initiative to promptly notify
the management’s authority in whose competence his folks are living and shall be
permitted to visit him. Should he, i.e. the inmate, passes away, the physician
shall prepare a report comprising the following:
2 - The inmate shall be considered during the period of his stay in the hospital or
in any other place for treatment under legal custody and it shall be incumbent
upon the warden to take the necessary measures to look after him while he is
under treatment in a manner which would not touch on that inmate.
Article Sixteen
The Director or whoever acts for him must immediately notify the public
prosecution or any competent authority of the death of any inmate who suddenly
passes away or as a result of an accident or of his serious injury as well as of any
crime which occurs by the inmates or against them or any serious accident
whatsoever.
Part Six
Article Seventeen
The Center’s warden or whoever acts for him should advise the inmate of any
judicial papers or any matters relating to him immediately upon its receipt by the
Center’s management and substantiation of its receipt in an official register.
Article Eighteen
The inmate has the right to submit any complaint or request. This shall be made
through:
Part Seven
Article Nineteen
It is prohibited for the Director or whoever acts for him or any member of the
Center to enter into any cell where one of the inmates is in it unless he is
accompanied by an escort.
Article Twenty
The members of the Directorate General are prohibited from carrying arms inside
the Center except in the following necessary conditions:
1 - For self defense after exhausting all other means such as tear gas,
water hoses or clubs.
3 - To put an end to any mutiny, riot or acts of violence that threatens the
breaking of the Center’s gates, climbing its walls or fore warns of the
serious breach of the security and discipline therein.
If the fire arm is used to warn, scare or deter the inmate, three warning shots
should be fired, if he does not comply , the fire arms should be shot towards his
legs with due care, as far as possible, to avoid the serious injuries. The necessary
first aid and treatment should be provided to the injured.
The fire arms may not be used in the cases where the life of others is exposed to
danger.
The Director should notify the concerned authorities of the use of fire arms as
well as commencing of the administrative investigation in order to learn of the
reasons and motives of the incident.
Part Eight
Classification of Inmates
The male inmates shall be placed in a section separate from the females whereby
it would not be possible for them to talk, contact or see each other. The juveniles
shall be placed in special centers for them.
The inmates from every sex shall be classified and distributed in separate
sections in as much as it is permitted under the circumstances of every Center:
The detained or judgment debtors inmates in civil lawsuits have the right to bring
in special food, clothes or covers from outside the Center.
The pregnant inmate shall be given, from the time of appearance of pregnancy
symptoms thereon and until sixty days after delivery, special treatment in so far
as nutrition, time of sleeping, work and shall be afforded with medical care
according to the recommendation of the physician. The necessary measures shall
be taken so that she may deliver at the hospital.
If the inmate delivers her baby in the center, this fact shall not be mentioned in
the official records nor in the birth certificate. The hospital shall be considered as
the place of birth and the child shall remain in the custody of his mother until he
reaches the age of two year. The Director should provide for the suckling mother
a separate place from the remaining inmates.
1 - If the inmate does not wish to keep her child with her after his delivery or if
he reaches the age of two, he shall be delivered to the person who is legally
entitled after the mother unless the physician decides that the health condition of
the child does not permit same.
2 - If there is no one who has the lawful right of the child’s custody, he shall be
placed in one of children care institution’s provided the mother is notified of the
place where her child was placed and she shall be permitted to see him
periodically.
Part Nine
Article Thirty
The academic or vocational certificate awarded to the inmate should not contain
any particulars which would indicate that it was awarded to him while he is in the
Center or from a school annexed to the Center.
The Directorate General shall grant suitable encouraging incentives to the inmate
who obtains the general or university certificates during his stay in the Center.
The inmates may bring in, at their expense, books, magazines and newspapers
whose circulation is legally permitted according the controls determined by the
Center’s management in this regard according to the by-laws and instructions
issued by the Directorate General.
Part Ten
Inmate Rights
Part Eleven
Transportation of Inmates
The Director shall undertake the responsibility of executing every judicial order
with respect to bringing an inmate or committing him to prison at the time set for
this purpose.
The papers, effects and deposits of the inmate shall be transferred to the Center
to which he is transferred.
Article Forty
A - Expose him to the eyes of the public except to the least possible extent
and measures must be taken to protect him from the insults and curiosity
of the public as well as not to expose him to all forms of publicity.
Part Twelve
The Center shall seek to train the inmates professionally and develop their skills
as well as make them acquire beneficial trades or professions during the period of
execution of the punishment which would help them earn their living after their
release. The theoretical and practical vocational training shall be carried out in
the training and employment workshops inside or outside the Center according to
the regulations and instructions issued by the Directorate General in this respect.
1 - The convicted inmates may be put to work within or outside the area of the
Center in any suitable job. It is not permissible to put the detained inmates to
work unless they wish to do so provided that the daily working hours may not
exceed eight hours and may not be put to work during their holidays.
2 - The sick inmates and those who have reached the age of sixty shall be
excluded from the application of the provisions of paragraph (1) above unless
they wish to work and the physician has testified to their ability to do so.
2 - Save those who are sentenced to hard labor, the work in or outside the
Center may not be characterized with cruelty or pain.
The inmate shall be granted, in consideration of his work in or outside the Center,
a wage to be fixed by the regulations and instructions.
Part Thirteen
1 - The release shall be according to the preceding article by a decision from the
Minister upon a proposal by the Director General. The decision shall specify the
reasons of release.
The Director should forward to the Director General a report on every inmate
whose sentence is more than ten years following the lapse of the first six years
showing therein all the particulars pertaining to the inmate provided that it is
followed by a periodical report in every year which lapses from the remaining
period.
The Chairman of the National Authority may release some of the inmates on the
national or religious occasions. The release shall be made at the time fixed in the
pardon decision.
Part Fourteen
Banned Items
The banned items may not be brought into the inmate in the Center. He may not
possess or take same therefrom except within the extent permitted by the law.
Article Fifty
The Center’s warden or whoever acts for him may inspect all things which are
taken in or out of the Center. He may stop or order the stoppage of every person
or inmate who is suspected of taking in or out or possesses any banned item to
the Center. He may instruct his legal search. If such an item is discovered, he
may impound same and refer the person with whom it was impounded to the
competent authorities.
If no crime has resulted from the prohibited items the Director may:
Part Fifteen
Visits
The visit to the inmate shall be permitted at regular periodical periods whose
timings shall be set by the regulations and instructions provided that the first visit
is permitted after the completion of investigations or lapse of a period of one
month from the date of detention, whichever is earlier.
The inmate has the right to correspond with his family and friends as well as
receive letters from them. The Center’s management may review the incoming
letters to and outgoing letters from him provided that the secrecy of letters is
maintained.
The Director may allow the visit to the sick inmate upon the directives of the
physician and may also allow the religious people to visit the inmates for the
purpose of preaching and guidance or holding the religious rites at the times and
places set by the regulations and instructions.
1 - The Director may prepare a special visitors’ register wherein the name and
address of every visitor who enters the Center shall be recorded.
2 - He may search any visitor he suspects to possess banned items. If the visitor
refuses to be subjected to search, he may be prevented from the visit and shall
record the reasons of prevention in the said register.
1 - The Director may grant the inmate a three days contingent leave in the event
of death or moving one of his relatives to the second degree to the hospital in a
serious sick condition provided he provides a guarantor to guarantee him during
the period of leave and return to the Center upon its expiry.
2 - The Director may grant the inmate of good conduct a twenty four hours leave
every four months at least provided that he should have spent one fourth the
period of his sentence and provided a guarantor to guarantee him during this
leave.
Part Sixteen
1 - The inmates who is sentenced to death shall be isolated from the remaining
inmates, placed under constant supervision and his visit barred except after
obtaining a written permission from the Director General.
2 - The Attorney General, his representative one of the clergymen or the Center’s
physician may visit him at any time.
3 - The Director shall, upon receiving the decision sanctioning the death
sentence, notify the inmate and his family or one of his relatives in order to visit
him on the day preceding the day set for the execution of the judgement.
4 - The Director shall read out the charge and pronouncement of the judgement
at a hearing distance from the attendees provided that the Attorney General or
his Attorney, Center’s Physician, a representative of the police and two other
persons selected by the Attorney General and one of the a clergymen to whom
the convicted is affiliated and his Attorney-At-Law, if he wishes, be amongst
them.
5 - The death sentence shall be executed inside the Center upon the request of
the Attorney General to the Director General. The corpse shall be handed over to
the local authority where the Center is located in its circuit for its burial.
Article Sixty
1 - The execution of the death sentence against the pregnant inmate who is
sentenced to death shall be suspended until after delivery and the child becomes
two years of age.
2 - The said judgement shall not be executed during official holidays and religious
and national feasts.
3 - The execution of the death sentence may not be postponed after receiving the
sanctioning decision on the judgement and notification of the convicted person
and his family of the matter.
Part Seventeen
1 - The Minister shall issue a by-law which would regulate the duties and
activities which the inmate should comply with as well as the impermissibles
which should be avoided.
1 - Warning
2 - Solitary confinement for a period not exceeding one week.
3 - Deprivation from some of the established advantages for his category
of inmates for a period not exceeding thirty days.
1 - The Director should release the inmate in the afternoon of the day in which
his sentence expired or the day preceding same. He may not be kept in the
Center thereafter.
Part Nineteen
General Provisions
The Minister shall issue the regulations and instructions which are necessary for
the implementation of this law.
Each of the Prisons Law No. (3) for the year 1946 in force in Gaza Governorates
and Prisons Law No. (23) for the year 1952 in force in the West Bank
Governorates as well as any other provisions which are contradictory with its
provisions shall be repealed.
All parties, each in so far as it is concerned, shall implement this law and shall be
put into operation as of the date of its publication in the official gazette.
Yasser Arafat
Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation
Organization Chairman of the Palestinian National Authority
Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners
Adopted by the First United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the
Treatment of Offenders, held at Geneva in 1955, and approved by the Economic
and Social Council by its resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII)
of 13 May 1977
PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS
1. The following rules are not intended to describe in detail a model system of penal institutions. They
seek only, on the basis of the general consensus of contemporary thought and the essential elements
of the most adequate systems of today, to set out what is generally accepted as being good principle
and practice in the treatment of prisoners and the management of institutions.
2. In view of the great variety of legal, social, economic and geographical conditions of the world, it is
evident that not all of the rules are capable of application in all places and at all times. They should,
however, serve to stimulate a constant endeavour to overcome practical difficulties in the way of their
application, in the knowledge that they represent, as a whole, the minimum conditions which are
accepted as suitable by the United Nations.
3. On the other hand, the rules cover a field in which thought is constantly developing. They are not
intended to preclude experiment and practices, provided these are in harmony with the principles and
seek to further the purposes which derive from the text of the rules as a whole. It will always be
justifiable for the central prison administration to authorize departures from the rules in this spirit.
4. (1) Part I of the rules covers the general management of institutions, and is applicable to all
categories of prisoners, criminal or civil, untried or convicted, including prisoners subject to "security
measures" or corrective measures ordered by the judge.
(2) Part II contains rules applicable only to the special categories dealt with in each section.
Nevertheless, the rules under section A, applicable to prisoners under sentence, shall be equally
applicable to categories of prisoners dealt with in sections B, C and D, provided they do not conflict
with the rules governing those categories and are for their benefit.
5. (1) The rules do not seek to regulate the management of institutions set aside for young persons
such as Borstal institutions or correctional schools, but in general part I would be equally applicable in
such institutions.
(2) The category of young prisoners should include at least all young persons who come within the
jurisdiction of juvenile courts. As a rule, such young persons should not be sentenced to imprisonment.
Part I
Basic principle
6. (1) The following rules shall be applied impartially. There shall be no discrimination on grounds of
race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth
or other status.
(2) On the other hand, it is necessary to respect the religious beliefs and moral precepts of the group
to which a prisoner belongs.
Register
2
7. (1) In every place where persons are imprisoned there shall be kept a bound registration book with
numbered pages in which shall be entered in respect of each prisoner received:
(2) No person shall be received in an institution without a valid commitment order of which the details
shall have been previously entered in the register.
Separation of categories
8. The different categories of prisoners shall be kept in separate institutions or parts of institutions
taking account of their sex, age, criminal record, the legal reason for their detention and the
necessities of their treatment. Thus,
( a ) Men and women shall so far as possible be detained in separate institutions; in an institution
which receives both men and women the whole of the premises allocated to women shall be entirely
separate;
( c ) Persons imprisoned for debt and other civil prisoners shall be kept separate from persons
imprisoned by reason of a criminal offence;
Accommodation
9. (1) Where sleeping accommodation is in individual cells or rooms, each prisoner shall occupy by
night a cell or room by himself. If for special reasons, such as temporary overcrowding, it becomes
necessary for the central prison administration to make an exception to this rule, it is not desirable to
have two prisoners in a cell or room.
(2) Where dormitories are used, they shall be occupied by prisoners carefully selected as being
suitable to associate with one another in those conditions. There shall be regular supervision by night,
in keeping with the nature of the institution.
10. All accommodation provided for the use of prisoners and in particular all sleeping accommodation
shall meet all requirements of health, due regard being paid to climatic conditions and particularly to
cubic content of air, minimum floor space, lighting, heating and ventilation.
( a ) The windows shall be large enough to enable the prisoners to read or work by natural light, and
shall be so constructed that they can allow the entrance of fresh air whether or not there is artificial
ventilation;
( b ) Artificial light shall be provided sufficient for the prisoners to read or work without injury to
eyesight.
12. The sanitary installations shall be adequate to enable every prisoner to comply with the needs of
nature when necessary and in a clean and decent manner.
13. Adequate bathing and shower installations shall be provided so that every prisoner may be enabled
and required to have a bath or shower, at a temperature suitable to the climate, as frequently as
3
necessary for general hygiene according to season and geographical region, but at least once a week
in a temperate climate.
14. All parts of an institution regularly used by prisoners shall be properly maintained and kept
scrupulously clean at all times.
Personal hygiene
15. Prisoners shall be required to keep their persons clean, and to this end they shall be provided with
water and with such toilet articles as are necessary for health and cleanliness.
16. In order that prisoners may maintain a good appearance compatible with their self-respect,
facilities shall be provided for the proper care of the hair and beard, and men shall be enabled to shave
regularly.
17. (1) Every prisoner who is not allowed to wear his own clothing shall be provided with an outfit of
clothing suitable for the climate and adequate to keep him in good health. Such clothing shall in no
manner be degrading or humiliating.
(2) All clothing shall be clean and kept in proper condition. Underclothing shall be changed and washed
as often as necessary for the maintenance of hygiene.
(3) In exceptional circumstances, whenever a prisoner is removed outside the institution for an
authorized purpose, he shall be allowed to wear his own clothing or other inconspicuous clothing.
18. If prisoners are allowed to wear their own clothing, arrangements shall be made on their admission
to the institution to ensure that it shall be clean and fit for use.
19. Every prisoner shall, in accordance with local or national standards, be provided with a separate
bed, and with separate and sufficient bedding which shall be clean when issued, kept in good order
and changed often enough to ensure its cleanliness.
Food
20. (1) Every prisoner shall be provided by the administration at the usual hours with food of
nutritional value adequate for health and strength, of wholesome quality and well prepared and
served.
(2) Drinking water shall be available to every prisoner whenever he needs it.
21. (1) Every prisoner who is not employed in outdoor work shall have at least one hour of suitable
exercise in the open air daily if the weather permits.
(2) Young prisoners, and others of suitable age and physique, shall receive physical and recreational
training during the period of exercise. To this end space, installations and equipment should be
provided.
Medical services
22. (1) At every institution there shall be available the services of at least one qualified medical officer
who should have some knowledge of psychiatry. The medical services should be organized in close
relationship to the general health administration of the community or nation. They shall include a
psychiatric service for the diagnosis and, in proper cases, the treatment of states of mental
abnormality.
4
(2) Sick prisoners who require specialist treatment shall be transferred to specialized institutions or to
civil hospitals. Where hospital facilities are provided in an institution, their equipment, furnishings and
pharmaceutical supplies shall be proper for the medical care and treatment of sick prisoners, and there
shall be a staff of suitable trained officers.
(3) The services of a qualified dental officer shall be available to every prisoner.
23. (1) In women's institutions there shall be special accommodation for all necessary pre-natal and
post-natal care and treatment. Arrangements shall be made wherever practicable for children to be
born in a hospital outside the institution. If a child is born in prison, this fact shall not be mentioned in
the birth certificate.
(2) Where nursing infants are allowed to remain in the institution with their mothers, provision shall be
made for a nursery staffed by qualified persons, where the infants shall be placed when they are not in
the care of their mothers.
24. The medical officer shall see and examine every prisoner as soon as possible after his admission
and thereafter as necessary, with a view particularly to the discovery of physical or mental illness and
the taking of all necessary measures; the segregation of prisoners suspected of infectious or
contagious conditions; the noting of physical or mental defects which might hamper rehabilitation, and
the determination of the physical capacity of every prisoner for work.
25. (1) The medical officer shall have the care of the physical and mental health of the prisoners and
should daily see all sick prisoners, all who complain of illness, and any prisoner to whom his attention
is specially directed.
(2) The medical officer shall report to the director whenever he considers that a prisoner's physical or
mental health has been or will be injuriously affected by continued imprisonment or by any condition of
imprisonment.
26. (1) The medical officer shall regularly inspect and advise the director upon:
( e ) The observance of the rules concerning physical education and sports, in cases where there is no
technical personnel in charge of these activities.
(2) The director shall take into consideration the reports and advice that the medical officer submits
according to rules 25 (2) and 26 and, in case he concurs with the recommendations made, shall take
immediate steps to give effect to those recommendations; if they are not within his competence or if
he does not concur with them, he shall immediately submit his own report and the advice of the
medical officer to higher authority.
27. Discipline and order shall be maintained with firmness, but with no more restriction than is
necessary for safe custody and well-ordered community life.
28. (1) No prisoner shall be employed, in the service of the institution, in any disciplinary capacity.
(2) This rule shall not, however, impede the proper functioning of systems based on self-government,
under which specified social, educational or sports activities or responsibilities are entrusted, under
supervision, to prisoners who are formed into groups for the purposes of treatment.
5
29. The following shall always be determined by the law or by the regulation of the competent
administrative authority:
30. (1) No prisoner shall be punished except in accordance with the terms of such law or regulation,
and never twice for the same offence.
(2) No prisoner shall be punished unless he has been informed of the offence alleged against him and
given a proper opportunity of presenting his defence. The competent authority shall conduct a
thorough examination of the case.
(3) Where necessary and practicable the prisoner shall be allowed to make his defence through an
interpreter.
31. Corporal punishment, punishment by placing in a dark cell, and all cruel, inhuman or degrading
punishments shall be completely prohibited as punishments for disciplinary offences.
32. (1) Punishment by close confinement or reduction of diet shall never be inflicted unless the medical
officer has examined the prisoner and certified in writing that he is fit to sustain it.
(2) The same shall apply to any other punishment that may be prejudicial to the physical or mental
health of a prisoner. In no case may such punishment be contrary to or depart from the principle
stated in rule 31.
(3) The medical officer shall visit daily prisoners undergoing such punishments and shall advise the
director if he considers the termination or alteration of the punishment necessary on grounds of
physical or mental health.
Instruments of restraint
33. Instruments of restraint, such as handcuffs, chains, irons and strait-jackets, shall never be applied
as a punishment. Furthermore, chains or irons shall not be used as restraints. Other instruments of
restraint shall not be used except in the following circumstances:
( a ) As a precaution against escape during a transfer, provided that they shall be removed when the
prisoner appears before a judicial or administrative authority;
( c ) By order of the director, if other methods of control fail, in order to prevent a prisoner from
injuring himself or others or from damaging property; in such instances the director shall at once
consult the medical officer and report to the higher administrative authority.
34. The patterns and manner of use of instruments of restraint shall be decided by the central prison
administration. Such instruments must not be applied for any longer time than is strictly necessary.
35. (1) Every prisoner on admission shall be provided with written information about the regulations
governing the treatment of prisoners of his category, the disciplinary requirements of the institution,
the authorized methods of seeking information and making complaints, and all such other matters as
are necessary to enable him to understand both his rights and his obligations and to adapt himself to
the life of the institution.
6
(2) If a prisoner is illiterate, the aforesaid information shall be conveyed to him orally.
36. (1) Every prisoner shall have the opportunity each week day of making requests or complaints to
the director of the institution or the officer authorized to represent him.
(2) It shall be possible to make requests or complaints to the inspector of prisons during his
inspection. The prisoner shall have the opportunity to talk to the inspector or to any other inspecting
officer without the director or other members of the staff being present.
(3) Every prisoner shall be allowed to make a request or complaint, without censorship as to substance
but in proper form, to the central prison administration, the judicial authority or other proper
authorities through approved channels.
(4) Unless it is evidently frivolous or groundless, every request or complaint shall be promptly dealt
with and replied to without undue delay.
37. Prisoners shall be allowed under necessary supervision to communicate with their family and
reputable friends at regular intervals, both by correspondence and by receiving visits.
38. (1) Prisoners who are foreign nationals shall be allowed reasonable facilities to communicate with
the diplomatic and consular representatives of the State to which they belong.
(2) Prisoners who are nationals of States without diplomatic or consular representation in the country
and refugees or stateless persons shall be allowed similar facilities to communicate with the diplomatic
representative of the State which takes charge of their interests or any national or international
authority whose task it is to protect such persons.
39. Prisoners shall be kept informed regularly of the more important items of news by the reading of
newspapers, periodicals or special institutional publications, by hearing wireless transmissions, by
lectures or by any similar means as authorized or controlled by the administration.
Books
40. Every institution shall have a library for the use of all categories of prisoners, adequately stocked
with both recreational and instructional books, and prisoners shall be encouraged to make full use of it.
Religion
41. (1) If the institution contains a sufficient number of prisoners of the same religion, a qualified
representative of that religion shall be appointed or approved. If the number of prisoners justifies it
and conditions permit, the arrangement should be on a full-time basis.
(2) A qualified representative appointed or approved under paragraph (1) shall be allowed to hold
regular services and to pay pastoral visits in private to prisoners of his religion at proper times.
(3) Access to a qualified representative of any religion shall not be refused to any prisoner. On the
other hand, if any prisoner should object to a visit of any religious representative, his attitude shall be
fully respected.
42. So far as practicable, every prisoner shall be allowed to satisfy the needs of his religious life by
attending the services provided in the institution and having in his possession the books of religious
observance and instruction of his denomination.
43. (1) All money, valuables, clothing and other effects belonging to a prisoner which under the
regulations of the institution he is not allowed to retain shall on his admission to the institution be
placed in safe custody. An inventory thereof shall be signed by the prisoner. Steps shall be taken to
keep them in good condition.
(2) On the release of the prisoner all such articles and money shall be returned to him except in so far
as he has been authorized to spend money or send any such property out of the institution, or it has
been found necessary on hygienic grounds to destroy any article of clothing. The prisoner shall sign a
receipt for the articles and money returned to him.
(3) Any money or effects received for a prisoner from outside shall be treated in the same way.
(4) If a prisoner brings in any drugs or medicine, the medical officer shall decide what use shall be
made of them.
44. (1) Upon the death or serious illness of, or serious injury to a prisoner, or his removal to an
institution for the treatment of mental affections, the director shall at once inform the spouse, if the
prisoner is married, or the nearest relative and shall in any event inform any other person previously
designated by the prisoner.
(2) A prisoner shall be informed at once of the death or serious illness of any near relative. In case of
the critical illness of a near relative, the prisoner should be authorized, whenever circumstances allow,
to go to his bedside either under escort or alone.
(3) Every prisoner shall have the right to inform at once his family of his imprisonment or his transfer
to another institution.
Removal of prisoners
45. (1) When the prisoners are being removed to or from an institution, they shall be exposed to
public view as little as possible, and proper safeguards shall be adopted to protect them from insult,
curiosity and publicity in any form.
(2) The transport of prisoners in conveyances with inadequate ventilation or light, or in any way which
would subject them to unnecessary physical hardship, shall be prohibited.
(3) The transport of prisoners shall be carried out at the expense of the administration and equal
conditions shall obtain for all of them.
Institutional personnel
46. (1) The prison administration shall provide for the careful selection of every grade of the
personnel, since it is on their integrity, humanity, professional capacity and personal suitability for the
work that the proper administration of the institutions depends.
(2) The prison administration shall constantly seek to awaken and maintain in the minds both of the
personnel and of the public the conviction that this work is a social service of great importance, and to
this end all appropriate means of informing the public should be used.
(3) To secure the foregoing ends, personnel shall be appointed on a full-time basis as professional
prison officers and have civil service status with security of tenure subject only to good conduct,
efficiency and physical fitness. Salaries shall be adequate to attract and retain suitable men and
women; employment benefits and conditions of service shall be favourable in view of the exacting
nature of the work.
47. (1) The personnel shall possess an adequate standard of education and intelligence.
8
(2) Before entering on duty, the personnel shall be given a course of training in their general and
specific duties and be required to pass theoretical and practical tests.
(3) After entering on duty and during their career, the personnel shall maintain and improve their
knowledge and professional capacity by attending courses of in-service training to be organized at
suitable intervals.
48. All members of the personnel shall at all times so conduct themselves and perform their duties as
to influence the prisoners for good by their example and to command their respect.
49. (1) So far as possible, the personnel shall include a sufficient number of specialists such as
psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, teachers and trade instructors.
(2) The services of social workers, teachers and trade instructors shall be secured on a permanent
basis, without thereby excluding part-time or voluntary workers.
50. (1) The director of an institution should be adequately qualified for his task by character,
administrative ability, suitable training and experience.
(2) He shall devote his entire time to his official duties and shall not be appointed on a part-time basis.
(3) He shall reside on the premises of the institution or in its immediate vicinity.
(4) When two or more institutions are under the authority of one director, he shall visit each of them
at frequent intervals. A responsible resident official shall be in charge of each of these institutions.
51. (1) The director, his deputy, and the majority of the other personnel of the institution shall be able
to speak the language of the greatest number of prisoners, or a language understood by the greatest
number of them.
52. (1) In institutions which are large enough to require the services of one or more full-time medical
officers, at least one of them shall reside on the premises of the institution or in its immediate vicinity.
(2) In other institutions the medical officer shall visit daily and shall reside near enough to be able to
attend without delay in cases of urgency.
53. (1) In an institution for both men and women, the part of the institution set aside for women shall
be under the authority of a responsible woman officer who shall have the custody of the keys of all
that part of the institution.
(2) No male member of the staff shall enter the part of the institution set aside for women unless
accompanied by a woman officer.
(3) Women prisoners shall be attended and supervised only by women officers. This does not,
however, preclude male members of the staff, particularly doctors and teachers, from carrying out
their professional duties in institutions or parts of institutions set aside for women.
54. (1) Officers of the institutions shall not, in their relations with the prisoners, use force except in
self-defence or in cases of attempted escape, or active or passive physical resistance to an order based
on law or regulations. Officers who have recourse to force must use no more than is strictly necessary
and must report the incident immediately to the director of the institution.
(2) Prison officers shall be given special physical training to enable them to restrain aggressive
prisoners.
9
(3) Except in special circumstances, staff performing duties which bring them into direct contact with
prisoners should not be armed. Furthermore, staff should in no circumstances be provided with arms
unless they have been trained in their use.
Inspection
55. There shall be a regular inspection of penal institutions and services by qualified and experienced
inspectors appointed by a competent authority. Their task shall be in particular to ensure that these
institutions are administered in accordance with existing laws and regulations and with a view to
bringing about the objectives of penal and correctional services.
Part II
Guiding principles
56. The guiding principles hereafter are intended to show the spirit in which penal institutions should
be administered and the purposes at which they should aim, in accordance with the declaration made
under Preliminary Observation 1 of the present text.
57. Imprisonment and other measures which result in cutting off an offender from the outside world
are afflictive by the very fact of taking from the person the right of self-determination by depriving him
of his liberty. Therefore the prison system shall not, except as incidental to justifiable segregation or
the maintenance of discipline, aggravate the suffering inherent in such a situation.
58. The purpose and justification of a sentence of imprisonment or a similar measure deprivative of
liberty is ultimately to protect society against crime. This end can only be achieved if the period of
imprisonment is used to ensure, so far as possible, that upon his return to society the offender is not
only willing but able to lead a law-abiding and self-supporting life.
59. To this end, the institution should utilize all the remedial, educational, moral, spiritual and other
forces and forms of assistance which are appropriate and available, and should seek to apply them
according to the individual treatment needs of the prisoners.
60. (1) The regime of the institution should seek to minimize any differences between prison life and
life at liberty which tend to lessen the responsibility of the prisoners or the respect due to their dignity
as human beings.
(2) Before the completion of the sentence, it is desirable that the necessary steps be taken to ensure
for the prisoner a gradual return to life in society. This aim may be achieved, depending on the case,
by a pre-release regime organized in the same institution or in another appropriate institution, or by
release on trial under some kind of supervision which must not be entrusted to the police but should
be combined with effective social aid.
61. The treatment of prisoners should emphasize not their exclusion from the community, but their
continuing part in it. Community agencies should, therefore, be enlisted wherever possible to assist the
staff of the institution in the task of social rehabilitation of the prisoners. There should be in connection
with every institution social workers charged with the duty of maintaining and improving all desirable
relations of a prisoner with his family and with valuable social agencies. Steps should be taken to
safeguard, to the maximum extent compatible with the law and the sentence, the rights relating to
civil interests, social security rights and other social benefits of prisoners.
10
62. The medical services of the institution shall seek to detect and shall treat any physical or mental
illnesses or defects which may hamper a prisoner's rehabilitation. All necessary medical, surgical and
psychiatric services shall be provided to that end.
63. (1) The fulfilment of these principles requires individualization of treatment and for this purpose a
flexible system of classifying prisoners in groups; it is therefore desirable that such groups should be
distributed in separate institutions suitable for the treatment of each group.
(2) These institutions need not provide the same degree of security for every group. It is desirable to
provide varying degrees of security according to the needs of different groups. Open institutions, by
the very fact that they provide no physical security against escape but rely on the self-discipline of the
inmates, provide the conditions most favourable to rehabilitation for carefully selected prisoners.
(3) It is desirable that the number of prisoners in closed institutions should not be so large that the
individualization of treatment is hindered. In some countries it is considered that the population of
such institutions should not exceed five hundred. In open institutions the population should be as small
as possible.
(4) On the other hand, it is undesirable to maintain prisons which are so small that proper facilities
cannot be provided.
64. The duty of society does not end with a prisoner's release. There should, therefore, be
governmental or private agencies capable of lending the released prisoner efficient after-care directed
towards the lessening of prejudice against him and towards his social rehabilitation.
Treatment
65. The treatment of persons sentenced to imprisonment or a similar measure shall have as its
purpose, so far as the length of the sentence permits, to establish in them the will to lead law-abiding
and self-supporting lives after their release and to fit them to do so. The treatment shall be such as
will encourage their self-respect and develop their sense of responsibility.
66. (1) To these ends, all appropriate means shall be used, including religious care in the countries
where this is possible, education, vocational guidance and training, social casework, employment
counselling, physical development and strengthening of moral character, in accordance with the
individual needs of each prisoner, taking account of his social and criminal history, his physical and
mental capacities and aptitudes, his personal temperament, the length of his sentence and his
prospects after release.
(2) For every prisoner with a sentence of suitable length, the director shall receive, as soon as possible
after his admission, full reports on all the matters referred to in the foregoing paragraph. Such reports
shall always include a report by a medical officer, wherever possible qualified in psychiatry, on the
physical and mental condition of the prisoner.
(3) The reports and other relevant documents shall be placed in an individual file. This file shall be
kept up to date and classified in such a way that it can be consulted by the responsible personnel
whenever the need arises.
( a ) To separate from others those prisoners who, by reason of their criminal records or bad
characters, are likely to exercise a bad influence;
( b ) To divide the prisoners into classes in order to facilitate their treatment with a view to their social
rehabilitation.
11
68. So far as possible separate institutions or separate sections of an institution shall be used for the
treatment of the different classes of prisoners.
69. As soon as possible after admission and after a study of the personality of each prisoner with a
sentence of suitable length, a programme of treatment shall be prepared for him in the light of the
knowledge obtained about his individual needs, his capacities and dispositions.
Privileges
70. Systems of privileges appropriate for the different classes of prisoners and the different methods of
treatment shall be established at every institution, in order to encourage good conduct, develop a
sense of responsibility and secure the interest and co-operation of the prisoners in their treatment.
Work
(2) All prisoners under sentence shall be required to work, subject to their physical and mental fitness
as determined by the medical officer.
(3) Sufficient work of a useful nature shall be provided to keep prisoners actively employed for a
normal working day.
(4) So far as possible the work provided shall be such as will maintain or increase the prisoners, ability
to earn an honest living after release.
(5) Vocational training in useful trades shall be provided for prisoners able to profit thereby and
especially for young prisoners.
(6) Within the limits compatible with proper vocational selection and with the requirements of
institutional administration and discipline, the prisoners shall be able to choose the type of work they
wish to perform.
72. (1) The organization and methods of work in the institutions shall resemble as closely as possible
those of similar work outside institutions, so as to prepare prisoners for the conditions of normal
occupational life.
(2) The interests of the prisoners and of their vocational training, however, must not be subordinated
to the purpose of making a financial profit from an industry in the institution.
73. (1) Preferably institutional industries and farms should be operated directly by the administration
and not by private contractors.
(2) Where prisoners are employed in work not controlled by the administration, they shall always be
under the supervision of the institution's personnel. Unless the work is for other departments of the
government the full normal wages for such work shall be paid to the administration by the persons to
whom the labour is supplied, account being taken of the output of the prisoners.
74. (1) The precautions laid down to protect the safety and health of free workmen shall be equally
observed in institutions.
(2) Provision shall be made to indemnify prisoners against industrial injury, including occupational
disease, on terms not less favourable than those extended by law to free workmen.
75. (1) The maximum daily and weekly working hours of the prisoners shall be fixed by law or by
administrative regulation, taking into account local rules or custom in regard to the employment of free
workmen.
12
(2) The hours so fixed shall leave one rest day a week and sufficient time for education and other
activities required as part of the treatment and rehabilitation of the prisoners.
76. (1) There shall be a system of equitable remuneration of the work of prisoners.
(2) Under the system prisoners shall be allowed to spend at least a part of their earnings on approved
articles for their own use and to send a part of their earnings to their family.
(3) The system should also provide that a part of the earnings should be set aside by the
administration so as to constitute a savings fund to be handed over to the prisoner on his release.
77. (1) Provision shall be made for the further education of all prisoners capable of profiting thereby,
including religious instruction in the countries where this is possible. The education of illiterates and
young prisoners shall be compulsory and special attention shall be paid to it by the administration.
(2) So far as practicable, the education of prisoners shall be integrated with the educational system of
the country so that after their release they may continue their education without difficulty.
78. Recreational and cultural activities shall be provided in all institutions for the benefit of the mental
and physical health of prisoners.
79. Special attention shall be paid to the maintenance and improvement of such relations between a
prisoner and his family as are desirable in the best interests of both.
80. From the beginning of a prisoner's sentence consideration shall be given to his future after release
and he shall be encouraged and assisted to maintain or establish such relations with persons or
agencies outside the institution as may promote the best interests of his family and his own social
rehabilitation.
81. (1) Services and agencies, governmental or otherwise, which assist released prisoners to re-
establish themselves in society shall ensure, so far as is possible and necessary, that released
prisoners be provided with appropriate documents and identification papers, have suitable homes and
work to go to, are suitably and adequately clothed having regard to the climate and season, and have
sufficient means to reach their destination and maintain themselves in the period immediately
following their release.
(2) The approved representatives of such agencies shall have all necessary access to the institution
and to prisoners and shall be taken into consultation as to the future of a prisoner from the beginning
of his sentence.
(3) It is desirable that the activities of such agencies shall be centralized or co-ordinated as far as
possible in order to secure the best use of their efforts.
82. (1) Persons who are found to be insane shall not be detained in prisons and arrangements shall be
made to remove them to mental institutions as soon as possible.
(2) Prisoners who suffer from other mental diseases or abnormalities shall be observed and treated in
specialized institutions under medical management.
(3) During their stay in a prison, such prisoners shall be placed under the special supervision of a
medical officer.
13
(4) The medical or psychiatric service of the penal institutions shall provide for the psychiatric
treatment of all other prisoners who are in need of such treatment.
83. It is desirable that steps should be taken, by arrangement with the appropriate agencies, to ensure
if necessary the continuation of psychiatric treatment after release and the provision of social-
psychiatric after-care.
84. (1) Persons arrested or imprisoned by reason of a criminal charge against them, who are detained
either in police custody or in prison custody (jail) but have not yet been tried and sentenced, will be
referred to as "untried prisoners" hereinafter in these rules.
(2) Unconvicted prisoners are presumed to be innocent and shall be treated as such.
(3) Without prejudice to legal rules for the protection of individual liberty or prescribing the procedure
to be observed in respect of untried prisoners, these prisoners shall benefit by a special regime which
is described in the following rules in its essential requirements only.
85. (1) Untried prisoners shall be kept separate from convicted prisoners.
(2) Young untried prisoners shall be kept separate from adults and shall in principle be detained in
separate institutions.
86. Untried prisoners shall sleep singly in separate rooms, with the reservation of different local
custom in respect of the climate.
87. Within the limits compatible with the good order of the institution, untried prisoners may, if they so
desire, have their food procured at their own expense from the outside, either through the
administration or through their family or friends. Otherwise, the administration shall provide their food.
88. (1) An untried prisoner shall be allowed to wear his own clothing if it is clean and suitable.
(2) If he wears prison dress, it shall be different from that supplied to convicted prisoners.
89. An untried prisoner shall always be offered opportunity to work, but shall not be required to work.
If he chooses to work, he shall be paid for it.
90. An untried prisoner shall be allowed to procure at his own expense or at the expense of a third
party such books, newspapers, writing materials and other means of occupation as are compatible with
the interests of the administration of justice and the security and good order of the institution.
91. An untried prisoner shall be allowed to be visited and treated by his own doctor or dentist if there
is reasonable ground for his application and he is able to pay any expenses incurred.
92. An untried prisoner shall be allowed to inform immediately his family of his detention and shall be
given all reasonable facilities for communicating with his family and friends, and for receiving visits
from them, subject only to restrictions and supervision as are necessary in the interests of the
administration of justice and of the security and good order of the institution.
93. For the purposes of his defence, an untried prisoner shall be allowed to apply for free legal aid
where such aid is available, and to receive visits from his legal adviser with a view to his defence and
to prepare and hand to him confidential instructions. For these purposes, he shall if he so desires be
supplied with writing material. Interviews between the prisoner and his legal adviser may be within
sight but not within the hearing of a police or institution official.
D. Civil prisoners
14
94. In countries where the law permits imprisonment for debt, or by order of a court under any other
non-criminal process, persons so imprisoned shall not be subjected to any greater restriction or
severity than is necessary to ensure safe custody and good order. Their treatment shall be not less
favourable than that of untried prisoners, with the reservation, however, that they may possibly be
required to work.
95. Without prejudice to the provisions of article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, persons arrested or imprisoned without charge shall be accorded the same protection as that
accorded under part I and part II, section C. Relevant provisions of part II, section A, shall likewise be
applicable where their application may be conducive to the benefit of this special group of persons in
custody, provided that no measures shall be taken implying that re-education or rehabilitation is in any
way appropriate to persons not convicted of any criminal offence.
1
Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of
Detention or Imprisonment
These principles apply for the protection of all persons under any form of detention or
imprisonment.
Use of Terms
( a ) "Arrest" means the act of apprehending a person for the alleged commission of an offence
or by the action of an authority;
( b ) "Detained person" means any person deprived of personal liberty except as a result of
conviction for an offence;
( c ) "Imprisoned person" means any person deprived of personal liberty as a result of conviction
for an offence;
( f ) The words "a judicial or other authority" means a judicial or other authority under the law
whose status and tenure should afford the strongest possible guarantees of competence,
impartiality and independence.
Principle 1
All persons under any form of detention or imprisonment shall be treated in a humane manner
and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person.
Principle 2
Arrest, detention or imprisonment shall only be carried out strictly in accordance with the
provisions of the law and by competent officials or persons authorized for that purpose.
Principle 3
There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the human rights of persons under
any form of detention or imprisonment recognized or existing in any State pursuant to law,
conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that this Body of Principles does not recognize
such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.
Principle 4
Any form of detention or imprisonment and all measures affecting the human rights of a person
under any form of detention or imprisonment shall be ordered by, or be subject to the effective
control of, a judicial or other authority.
Principle 5
2
1. These principles shall be applied to all persons within the territory of any given State, without
distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion or religious belief, political or
other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, property, birth or other status.
2. Measures applied under the law and designed solely to protect the rights and special status of
women, especially pregnant women and nursing mothers, children and juveniles, aged, sick or
handicapped persons shall not be deemed to be discriminatory. The need for, and the application
of, such measures shall always be subject to review by a judicial or other authority.
Principle 6
No person under any form of detention or imprisonment shall be subjected to torture or to cruel,
inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. 1 No circumstance whatever may be invoked as
a justification for torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Principle 7
1. States should prohibit by law any act contrary to the rights and duties contained in these
principles, make any such act subject to appropriate sanctions and conduct impartial
investigations upon complaints.
2. Officials who have reason to believe that a violation of this Body of Principles has occurred or
is about to occur shall report the matter to their superior authorities and, where necessary, to
other appropriate authorities or organs vested with reviewing or remedial powers.
3. Any other person who has ground to believe that a violation of this Body of Principles has
occurred or is about to occur shall have the right to report the matter to the superiors of the
officials involved as well as to other appropriate authorities or organs vested with reviewing or
remedial powers.
Principle 8
Principle 9
The authorities which arrest a person, keep him under detention or investigate the case shall
exercise only the powers granted to them under the law and the exercise of these powers shall
be subject to recourse to a judicial or other authority.
Principle 10
Anyone who is arrested shall be informed at the time of his arrest of the reason for his arrest
and shall be promptly informed of any charges against him.
Principle 11
1. A person shall not be kept in detention without being given an effective opportunity to be
heard promptly by a judicial or other authority. A detained person shall have the right to defend
himself or to be assisted by counsel as prescribed by law.
2. A detained person and his counsel, if any, shall receive prompt and full communication of any
order of detention, together with the reasons therefor.
Principle 12
3
( b ) The time of the arrest and the taking of the arrested person to a place of custody as well as
that of his first appearance before a judicial or other authority;
2. Such records shall be communicated to the detained person, or his counsel, if any, in the form
prescribed by law.
Principle 13
Any person shall, at the moment of arrest and at the commencement of detention or
imprisonment, or promptly thereafter, be provided by the authority responsible for his arrest,
detention or imprisonment, respectively with information on and an explanation of his rights and
how to avail himself of such rights.
Principle 14
A person who does not adequately understand or speak the language used by the authorities
responsible for his arrest, detention or imprisonment is entitled to receive promptly in a
language which he understands the information referred to in principle 10, principle 11,
paragraph 2, principle 12, paragraph 1, and principle 13 and to have the assistance, free of
charge, if necessary, of an interpreter in connection with legal proceedings subsequent to his
arrest.
Principle 15
Notwithstanding the exceptions contained in principle 16, paragraph 4, and principle 18,
paragraph 3, communication of the detained or imprisoned person with the outside world, and in
particular his family or counsel, shall not be denied for more than a matter of days.
Principle 16
1. Promptly after arrest and after each transfer from one place of detention or imprisonment to
another, a detained or imprisoned person shall be entitled to notify or to require the competent
authority to notify members of his family or other appropriate persons of his choice of his arrest,
detention or imprisonment or of the transfer and of the place where he is kept in custody.
4. Any notification referred to in the present principle shall be made or permitted to be made
without delay. The competent authority may however delay a notification for a reasonable period
where exceptional needs of the investigation so require.
4
Principle 17
1. A detained person shall be entitled to have the assistance of a legal counsel. He shall be
informed of his right by the competent authority promptly after arrest and shall be provided with
reasonable facilities for exercising it.
2. If a detained person does not have a legal counsel of his own choice, he shall be entitled to
have a legal counsel assigned to him by a judicial or other authority in all cases where the
interests of justice so require and without payment by him if he does not have sufficient means
to pay.
Principle 18
1. A detained or imprisoned person shall be entitled to communicate and consult with his legal
counsel.
2. A detained or imprisoned person shall be allowed adequate time and facilities for consultation
with his legal counsel.
4. Interviews between a detained or imprisoned person and his legal counsel may be within
sight, but not within the hearing, of a law enforcement official.
5. Communications between a detained or imprisoned person and his legal counsel mentioned in
the present principle shall be inadmissible as evidence against the detained or imprisoned person
unless they are connected with a continuing or contemplated crime.
Principle 19
A detained or imprisoned person shall have the right to be visited by and to correspond with, in
particular, members of his family and shall be given adequate opportunity to communicate with
the outside world, subject to reasonable conditions and restrictions as specified by law or lawful
regulations.
Principle 20
Principle 21
2. No detained person while being interrogated shall be subject to violence, threats or methods
of interrogation which impair his capacity of decision or his judgement.
Principle 22
No detained or imprisoned person shall, even with his consent, be subjected to any medical or
scientific experimentation which may be detrimental to his health.
5
Principle 23
1. The duration of any interrogation of a detained or imprisoned person and of the intervals
between interrogations as well as the identity of the officials who conducted the interrogations
and other persons present shall be recorded and certified in such form as may be prescribed by
law.
2. A detained or imprisoned person, or his counsel when provided by law, shall have access to
the information described in paragraph 1 of the present principle.
Principle 24
Principle 25
A detained or imprisoned person or his counsel shall, subject only to reasonable conditions to
ensure security and good order in the place of detention or imprisonment, have the right to
request or petition a judicial or other authority for a second medical examination or opinion.
Principle 26
The fact that a detained or imprisoned person underwent a medical examination, the name of
the physician and the results of such an examination shall be duly recorded. Access to such
records shall be ensured. Modalities therefore shall be in accordance with relevant rules of
domestic law.
Principle 27
Non-compliance with these principles in obtaining evidence shall be taken into account in
determining the admissibility of such evidence against a detained or imprisoned person.
Principle 28
A detained or imprisoned person shall have the right to obtain within the limits of available
resources, if from public sources, reasonable quantities of educational, cultural and informational
material, subject to reasonable conditions to ensure security and good order in the place of
detention or imprisonment.
Principle 29
1. In order to supervise the strict observance of relevant laws and regulations, places of
detention shall be visited regularly by qualified and experienced persons appointed by, and
responsible to, a competent authority distinct from the authority directly in charge of the
administration of the place of detention or imprisonment.
2. A detained or imprisoned person shall have the right to communicate freely and in full
confidentiality with the persons who visit the places of detention or imprisonment in accordance
with paragraph 1 of the present principle, subject to reasonable conditions to ensure security
and good order in such places.
Principle 30
1. The types of conduct of the detained or imprisoned person that constitute disciplinary offences
during detention or imprisonment, the description and duration of disciplinary punishment that
6
may be inflicted and the authorities competent to impose such punishment shall be specified by
law or lawful regulations and duly published.
2. A detained or imprisoned person shall have the right to be heard before disciplinary action is
taken. He shall have the right to bring such action to higher authorities for review.
Principle 31
The appropriate authorities shall endeavour to ensure, according to domestic law, assistance
when needed to dependent and, in particular, minor members of the families of detained or
imprisoned persons and shall devote a particular measure of care to the appropriate custody of
children left with out supervision.
Principle 32
1. A detained person or his counsel shall be entitled at any time to take proceedings according to
domestic law before a judicial or other authority to challenge the lawfulness of his detention in
order to obtain his release without delay, if it is unlawful.
2. The proceedings referred to in paragraph 1 of the present principle shall be simple and
expeditious and at no cost for detained persons without adequate means. The detaining
authority shall produce without unreasonable delay the detained person before the reviewing
authority.
Principle 33
1. A detained or imprisoned person or his counsel shall have the right to make a request or
complaint regarding his treatment, in particular in case of torture or other cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment, to the authorities responsible for the administration of the place of
detention and to higher authorities and, when necessary, to appropriate authorities vested with
reviewing or remedial powers.
2. In those cases where neither the detained or imprisoned person nor his counsel has the
possibility to exercise his rights under paragraph 1 of the present principle, a member of the
family of the detained or imprisoned person or any other person who has knowledge of the case
may exercise such rights.
4. Every request or complaint shall be promptly dealt with and replied to without undue delay. If
the request or complaint is rejected or, in case of inordinate delay, the complainant shall be
entitled to bring it before a judicial or other authority. Neither the detained or imprisoned person
nor any complainant under paragraph 1 of the present principle shall suffer prejudice for making
a request or complaint.
Principle 34
Whenever the death or disappearance of a detained or imprisoned person occurs during his
detention or imprisonment, an inquiry into the cause of death or disappearance shall be held by
a judicial or other authority, either on its own motion or at the instance of a member of the
family of such a person or any person who has knowledge of the case. When circumstances so
warrant, such an inquiry shall be held on the same procedural basis whenever the death or
disappearance occurs shortly after the termination of the detention or imprisonment. The
findings of such inquiry or a report thereon shall be made available upon request, unless doing
so would jeopardize an ongoing criminal investigation.
Principle 35
7
1. Damage incurred because of acts or omissions by a public official contrary to the rights
contained in these principles shall be compensated according to the applicable rules or liability
provided by domestic law.
Principle 36
1. A detained person suspected of or charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent
and shall be treated as such until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has
had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
2. The arrest or detention of such a person pending investigation and trial shall be carried out
only for the purposes of the administration of justice on grounds and under conditions and
procedures specified by law. The imposition of restrictions upon such a person which are not
strictly required for the purpose of the detention or to prevent hindrance to the process of
investigation or the administration of justice, or for the maintenance of security and good order
in the place of detention shall be forbidden.
Principle 37
A person detained on a criminal charge shall be brought before a judicial or other authority
provided by law promptly after his arrest. Such authority shall decide without delay upon the
lawfulness and necessity of detention. No person may be kept under detention pending
investigation or trial except upon the written order of such an authority. A detained person shall,
when brought before such an authority, have the right to make a statement on the treatment
received by him while in custody.
Principle 38
A person detained on a criminal charge shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to
release pending trial.
Principle 39
Except in special cases provided for by law, a person detained on a criminal charge shall be
entitled, unless a judicial or other authority decides otherwise in the interest of the
administration of justice, to release pending trial subject to the conditions that may be imposed
in accordance with the law. Such authority shall keep the necessity of detention under review.
General clause
Nothing in this Body of Principles shall be construed as restricting or derogating from any right
defined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
1. All prisoners shall be treated with the respect due to their inherent dignity and value as
human beings.
2. There shall be no discrimination on the grounds of race, colour, sex, language, religion,
political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
3. It is, however, desirable to respect the religious beliefs and cultural precepts of the group to
which prisoners belong, whenever local conditions so require.
4. The responsibility of prisons for the custody of prisoners and for the protection of society
against crime shall be discharged in keeping with a State's other social objectives and its
fundamental responsibilities for promoting the well-being and development of all members of
society.
5. Except for those limitations that are demonstrably necessitated by the fact of incarceration,
all prisoners shall retain the human rights and fundamental freedoms set out in the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, and, where the State concerned is a party, the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights and the Optional Protocol thereto, as well as such other rights as are set out in
other United Nations covenants.
6. All prisoners shall have the right to take part in cultural activities and education aimed at
the full development of the human personality.
9. Prisoners shall have access to the health services available in the country without
discrimination on the grounds of their legal situation.
10. With the participation and help of the community and social institutions, and with due
regard to the interests of victims, favourable conditions shall be created for the reintegration
of the ex-prisoner into society under the best possible conditions.
R i g h t s
HUMAN RIGHTS
AND
PRISONS
H u m a n
A Pocketbook of
International Human Rights
Standards for Prison Officials
Professional
Training
Series No.
11
Add. 3
UNITED NATIONS
New York and Geneva, 2005
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page ii
NOTE
HR/P/PT/11/Add.3
iii
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page iv
iv
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page v
CONTENTS
Page
Note to users of the Pocketbook ............................... iii
Abbreviations for international instruments cited in
the Pocketbook ......................................................... vii
INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS STANDARDS FOR
PRISON OFFICIALS
VIII. General Principles ............................................ 1
VIII. Right to Physical and Moral Integrity ............... 1
VIII. Right to an Adequate Standard of Living ........ 4
IIIIV. Health Rights of Prisoners ............................... 5
IIIIV. Making Prisons Safe Places ............................. 8
IIVI. Making the Best Use of Prisons ...................... 9
IVII. Prisoners’ Contact with the Outside World ..... 11
VIII. Complaints and Inspection Procedures ............ 12
IIIX. Special Categories of Prisoners ....................... 13
IIIX. A. Non-discrimination .................................. 13
IIIX. B. Women in prison ..................................... 14
IIIX. C. Juveniles in detention .............................. 15
IIIX. D. Prisoners under sentence of death ........... 16
IIIX. E. Life and long-term prisoners .................... 17
IIIX. Persons under Detention without Sentence .... 18
IIXI. Non-custodial Measures .................................. 20
IXII. The Administration of Prisons and Prison Staff... 22
Endnotes ................................................................... 27
v
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page vii
vii
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page viii
viii
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page ix
ix
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 1
I. General Principles
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and
rights.4
1
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 2
2
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 3
3
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 4
4
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 5
5
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 6
6
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 7
7
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 8
8
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 9
9
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 10
10
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 11
11
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 12
12
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 13
A. Non-discrimination
All persons are equal before the law and are entitled,
without discrimination, to equal protection of the law.97
13
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 14
B. Women in prison
14
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 15
C. Juveniles in detention
15
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 16
16
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 17
17
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 18
18
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 19
19
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 20
20
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 21
21
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 22
22
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 23
23
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 24
24
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 25
25
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 26
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 27
ENDNOTES
1
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [hereinafter “ICCPR”],
article 2, para. 3.
2
Charter of the United Nations, Preamble, Article 1 and Article 55 (c).
3
ICCPR, article 2, para. 3; Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials
[hereinafter “Code of Conduct”], article 2.
4
Universal Declaration of Human Rights [hereinafter “UDHR”], preamble and
article 1; ICCPR, preamble.
5
UDHR, preamble and article 1; ICCPR, preamble.
6
Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of
Detention or Imprisonment [hereinafter “Principles on Detention or
Imprisonment”], principle 1; Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners
[hereinafter “BPT”], principle 1.
7
UDHR, article 5; ICCPR, article 7; Convention against Torture and Other
Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment [hereinafter “CAT”],
preamble and article 2; Code of Conduct, article 5.
8
CAT, article 1.
9
CAT, article 16.
10
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, article 7.
11
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 22.
12
Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance
[hereinafter “Declaration on Enforced Disappearance”], article 1; Principles
on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and
Summary Executions [hereinafter “Principles on Summary Executions”],
principle 1.
13
CAT, article 10.
14
CAT, article 15.
15
CAT, article 2.
16
Code of Conduct, article 3.
17
CAT, article 13.
18
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 34.
19
CAT, article 11.
27
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 28
20
Principles on Summary Executions, principle 6.
21
Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners [hereinafter
“SMR”], rule 7; Declaration on Enforced Disappearance, article 10;
Principles on Summary Executions, principle 6.
22
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 13; SMR, rule 35.
23
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 12; Principles on
Summary Executions, principle 6.
24
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 24; SMR, rule 24.
25
ICCPR, article 10, para. 1.
26
UDHR, article 25; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights [hereinafter “ICESCR”], article 11; Convention on the Rights of the
Child [hereinafter “CRC”], article 27; Guidelines and Measures for the
Prohibition and Prevention of Torture, Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment in Africa [hereinafter “Robben Island
Guidelines”], paragraph 34.
27
SMR, rule 10.
28
SMR, rule 9 (2).
29
ICESCR, article 11.
30
SMR, rule 20.
31
ICESCR, article 11.
32
SMR, rule 17 (1).
33
SMR, rules 17 (2) and 18.
34
SMR, rule 19.
35
SMR, rule 19.
36
ICESCR, article 12.
37
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 24; SMR, rule 24.
38
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 24.
39
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 25.
40
UDHR, article 25; ICESCR, article 12.
41
BPT, principle 9.
42
SMR, rule 25.
43
SMR, rule 26.
44
SMR, rule 22 (1) and (2).
28
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 29
45
SMR, rule 22 (3).
46
SMR, rule 22 (1).
47
SMR, rule 82 (1).
48
SMR, rule 82 (2).
49
SMR, rule 82 (3).
50
SMR, rule 22 (1).
51
Principles of Medical Ethics relevant to the Role of Health Personnel,
particularly Physicians, in the Protection of Prisoners and Detainees against
Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
[hereinafter “Principles of Medical Ethics”], principle 1.
52
Principles of Medical Ethics, principles 1 to 6.
53
Principles of Medical Ethics, principles 1 to 6.
54
SMR, rules 12 to 16.
55
SMR, rule 21.
56
Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement
Officials [hereinafter “Principles on Force and Firearms”], principle 9.
57
SMR, rule 33.
58
SMR, rule 27.
59
SMR, rule 27.
60
SMR, rule 33.
61
SMR, rule 27.
62
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 30; SMR, rules 29 and
30.
63
SMR, rule 30 (2).
64
SMR, rule 28 (1).
65
SMR, rule 31.
66
SMR, rule 32.
67
SMR, rule 33.
68
ICCPR, article 2; Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 30,
para. 2.
69
ICCPR, article 10, para. 3.
70
SMR, rules 65 and 66 (1).
71
SMR, rules 66 (1) and 71; BPT, principle 8.
29
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 30
72
SMR, rules 72 (1) and 74.
73
SMR, rule 71 (5).
74
UDHR, article 23; SMR, rule 76 (1).
75
SMR, rule 76 (2) and (3).
76
UDHR, articles 26 and 27; ICESCR, article 13; SMR, rules 40, 77 and 78.
77
BPT, principle 6; Economic and Social Council resolution 1990/20 of 24
May 1990, paragraph 3 (a).
78
SMR, rule 77.
79
Economic and Social Council resolution 1990/20 of 24 May 1990,
paragraph 3 (i).
80
UDHR, article 18; ICCPR, article 18.
81
SMR, rule 41.
82
SMR, rule 80.
83
SMR, rule 81; BPT, principle 10.
84
UDHR, article 12; ICCPR, article 17.
85
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 19; SMR, rules 37 and
79.
86
SMR, rule 38.
87
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 20.
88
SMR, rule 39.
89
ICCPR, article 2; CAT, article 13; Principles on Detention or Imprisonment,
principle 33.
90
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 33; SMR, rule 36.
91
SMR, rule 35.
92
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 33, para. 4.
93
CAT, article 12; Principles on the Effective Investigation and
Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment, principle 2.
94
Principles on Summary Executions, principle 9.
95
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 29, para. 1; SMR, rule
55.
96
SMR, rules 36 (2) and 55; Principles on Detention or Imprisonment,
principle 29, para. 2.
30
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 31
97
UDHR, article 7; ICCPR, articles 2 and 26; International Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, articles 2 and 5.
98
UDHR, article 18; ICCPR, articles 18 and 27.
99
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 14.
100
SMR, rule 38 (1).
101
SMR, rule 38 (2).
102
UDHR, article 2; ICCPR, article 3; Convention on the Elimination of All
Forms of Discrimination against Women [hereinafter “CEDAW”], articles
1, 2 and 3; Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women
[hereinafter “Declaration on Violence against Women”], article 3.
103
CEDAW, articles 1, 6 and 7; Declaration on Violence against Women,
articles 2 and 4.
104
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 5; SMR, rule 8 (a).
105
SMR, rule 53.
106
SMR, rule 23 (1).
107
SMR, rule 23 (1).
108
UDHR, article 1 and article 25, para. 2; CRC, preamble; ICCPR, preamble.
109
CRC, articles 3 and 37; United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the
Administration of Juvenile Justice (The Beijing Rules) [hereinafter “Beijing
Rules”], rules 1, 5 and 6; United Nations Rules for the Protection of
Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty [hereinafter “Rules for Juveniles”], rules
1, 4, 14, 31, 79 and 80.
110
CRC, article 37 (a); Beijing Rules, rule 27; Rules for Juveniles, rules 64, 66
and 67.
111
ICCPR, article 10, para. 2 (b); CRC, article 37 (c); Beijing Rules, rules 13.4
and 26.3; Rules for Juveniles, rule 29.
112
CRC, articles 9, 10 and 37 (c); Beijing Rules, rules 13.3, 26.5 and 27.2;
SMR, rule 37; Rules for Juveniles, rule 59.
113
CRC, article 40, para. 2 (b) (vii); Beijing Rules, rule 21.1.
114
ICESCR, article 13; CRC, article 28; Rules for Juveniles, rules 38 and 42.
115
Rules for Juveniles, rule 65.
116
Rules for Juveniles, rule 66.
31
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 32
117
CRC, article 37 (c) and article 40, para. 2 (b) (ii); Beijing Rules, rules 10.1
and 26.5; SMR, rules 37 and 44; Rules for Juveniles, rules 56 and 57.
118
UDHR, article 3; ICCPR, article 6, para. 1.
119
ICCPR, article 6, para. 2; Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights
of those facing the death penalty [hereinafter “Death Penalty
Safeguards”], para. 1.
120
ICCPR, article 6, para. 5; Death Penalty Safeguards, para. 3.
121
Death Penalty Safeguards, para. 9.
122
ICCPR, article 6, para. 6.
123
ICCPR, article 10, para. 3.
124
CRC, article 37 (a).
125
SMR, rule 60 (1).
126
SMR, rules 65 and 66.
127
SMR, rule 37.
128
Resolution (76) 2 of 17 February 1976 of the Committee of Ministers of
the Council of Europe on the treatment of long-term prisoners.
129
UDHR, article 11; ICCPR, article 14, para. 2; Principles on Detention or
Imprisonment, principle 36; SMR, rule 84 (2).
130
UDHR, article 3; ICCPR, article 9, para. 1.
131
ICCPR, article 9, para. 2, and article 14, para. 3 (a); Principles on
Detention or Imprisonment, principle 10.
132
ICCPR, article 9, para. 4; Principles on Detention or Imprisonment,
principle 37.
133
ICCPR, article 9, para. 3; Principles on Detention or Imprisonment,
principle 38.
134
Robben Island Guidelines, para. 28.
135
UDHR, article 11; ICCPR, article 14, para. 3 (b) and (d); Principles on
Detention or Imprisonment, principles 17 and 18; SMR, rule 93.
136
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 16, para. 1; SMR, rules
44 (3) and 92; Declaration on Enforced Disappearance, article 10, para. 2;
Principles on Summary Executions, principle 6.
137
ICCPR, article 10, para. 2 (a); Principles on Detention or Imprisonment,
principle 8; SMR, rules 8 (b) and 85 (1).
32
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 33
138
SMR, rule 86.
139
SMR, rule 87.
140
SMR, rule 88 (1).
141
SMR, rule 88 (2).
142
SMR, rule 89.
143
SMR, rule 90; Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 28.
144
SMR, rule 91.
145
ICCPR, article 9, para. 3.
146
Principles on Detention or Imprisonment, principle 39; United Nations
Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures (The Tokyo Rules)
[hereinafter “Tokyo Rules”], rule 6.2.
147
Tokyo Rules, rule 6.3.
148
SMR, rule 95.
149
Tokyo Rules, rule 1.
150
Tokyo Rules, rule 2.2.
151
Tokyo Rules, rule 2.5.
152
Tokyo Rules, rule 2.6.
153
Tokyo Rules, rule 9.4.
154
Tokyo Rules, rule 22.
155
Tokyo Rules, rule 2.3.
156
ICCPR, article 9, para. 3; Tokyo Rules, rules 5 and 6.
157
Tokyo Rules, rules 2.3 and 8.1.
158
Tokyo Rules, rule 8.1.
159
Tokyo Rules, rule 2.4.
160
ICCPR, preamble; Code of Conduct, article 2.
161
SMR, rule 46 (3).
162
SMR, rule 46 (1).
163
SMR, rule 46 (2).
164
SMR, rule 46 (3).
165
UDHR, article 2; ICCPR, articles 2, 3 and 26; CEDAW, preamble and
articles 2, 3 and 7 (b); General Assembly resolution 34/169 of 17
December 1979 (resolution adopting the Code of Conduct for Law
Enforcement Officials), eighth preambular paragraph, subpara. (a).
33
0442541_CORRPocketBook11Add3.qxp 14.09.2005 13:47 Page 34
166
General Assembly resolution 34/169 of 17 December 1979, eighth
preambular paragraph, subpara. (a); SMR, rule 53.
167
SMR, rule 47.
168
SMR, rule 48; Code of Conduct, article 8.
169
SMR, rule 49.
170
SMR, rule 50.
171
SMR, rule 51 (1).
172
SMR, rule 52.
173
SMR, rule 53.
174
SMR, rule 54 (1); Code of Conduct, article 3; Principles on Force and
Firearms, principles 4 and 15.
175
Principles on Force and Firearms, principle 5.
176
SMR, rule 54 (3).
177
Code of Conduct, article 4.
178
Code of Conduct, article 6.
179
Principles on Force and Firearms, principle 9.
180
Principles on Force and Firearms, principle 9.
34
ﻣﻧﻅﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺣﺭﻳﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺳﻁﻳﻧﻲﺓ
ﺍﻟﺳﻠﻁﺔ ﺍﻟﻭﻁﻧﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺳﻁﻳﻧﻳﺔ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺧﻠﻳﺔ
CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION
PRESENTED TO
[ Name]
…………………………………………………………………………………
THE “ [ title ] ”
TRAINING WORKSHOP
[ date ]
Ramallah, Palestine
________________________ ________________________
Mr Mohammed Abdul-Aziz Col. Mahmoud Rahhal
Regional Representative, Director-General of General Administration,
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Reform and Rehabilitation Centres
Chapter 9
International Instruments
Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of
Detention of Imprisonment (1988)
Assessment Tools
Human Rights and Prisons – Manual on Human Rights Training for Prison
Officials - Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
(2005).
Human Rights and Prisons - A Manual on Human Rights Training for Prison
Officials - Penal Reform International (2005).
Specialised Tools
The course methodology is designed to be interactive and engaging by emphasizing active participation and the application of practical experience. Interactive techniques such as discussions, group activities, and the use of real-life scenarios are employed to ensure that the training is not merely theoretical but relevant to the daily duties of prison staff . By drawing on the participants' knowledge and expertise, the course aims to make the learning process more relatable and effective, promoting an environment of shared learning and collaboration .
Group activities and discussions are structured to deepen participants' understanding of human rights by encouraging them to engage with the materials actively and collaboratively. These sessions prompt participants to analyze relevant laws, compare them with international standards, and discuss potential disparities, fostering critical thinking and problem-solving skills . By working in groups, participants can share diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a richer understanding of how human rights can be upheld in prison settings and highlighting practical challenges and solutions .
The principles in the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment emphasize universal rights such as humane treatment and procedural fairness . Local regulations may vary in implementation, focusing on logistical and administrative aspects specific to national legal frameworks . Differences can arise in the enforcement of rights, where local regulations might not fully embrace the comprehensive scope of international standards, potentially omitting safeguards against abuses or lacks in enforcement mechanisms. Bridging these differences requires amendments to local laws to incorporate broader international principles, ensuring that detention practices meet global norms .
The alignment of Palestinian Law of Reform and Rehabilitation Centres with international human rights standards could enhance the protection of prisoners' rights and ensure humane treatment in line with global expectations . Potential benefits include improved prisoner conditions and clarity in legal procedures, which could foster transparency and accountability. However, challenges may arise due to resource constraints, differences in legal frameworks, and resistance to change within local systems. Differences between domestic and international standards, such as cultural and administrative practices, may lead to complexities in implementation .
The provisions for the transfer and notification of inmates emphasize prompt communication of rights to the detainees and their families, aligning with international standards such as the UN Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment . These standards require that inmates be informed of their rights and have the opportunity to communicate with their families, reflecting global norms for humane treatment and transparency . The rules also mandate that inmates' conditions during transfer should not expose them to undue hardship, ensuring that international principles of humane treatment are maintained during all stages of detention .
Preparing prisoners for release involves consideration of several key factors, such as providing social support, access to identification and employment resources, and ensuring continuity of care for those with medical or psychological needs . Strategies include implementing comprehensive pre-release programs that focus on resocialization and skill development to aid reintegration into society . The training underscores the importance of collaboration with external agencies to provide ongoing support and resources after release, emphasizing the role of community engagement in successful rehabilitation .
Gaps between the Palestinian Law of Reform and Rehabilitation Centres and international human rights standards could include differences in the scope and enforcement of rights, such as personal safety, legal representation, and conditions of detention . Addressing these gaps involves reviewing national laws to align more closely with international instruments such as the UDHR and ICCPR, updating legislation to reflect comprehensive rights protections, and ensuring rigorous enforcement mechanisms . Training for both administrative and frontline staff on human rights principles and integrating oversight mechanisms can help bridge these gaps .
The training materials emphasize that prison staff have a crucial role in protecting the human rights of prisoners by familiarizing them with the principles of human rights and human dignity. The objectives include sensitizing staff to their impact on prisoners' rights and promoting legality and compliance with international standards . The training outlines practical responsibilities of prison staff, such as ensuring humane treatment and respecting prisoners' rights, while also reinforcing the importance of ethical and legal standards in daily operations .
International human rights standards play a foundational role in shaping the duties and responsibilities of law enforcement officials by establishing the framework within which they must operate. These standards require that officials respect and protect the rights of all individuals, providing guidelines on the humane treatment of detainees and the need for accountability in law enforcement actions . Training programs emphasize these standards to ensure that officials are equipped to recognize and uphold human dignity and rights in their duties. This influences policy-making, procedural standards, and the ethical obligations of law enforcement personnel, driving the development of comprehensive training and adherence to international legal norms .
Effective implementation of international human rights standards in prisons can be achieved through a multi-faceted approach. This includes regular training and education of prison staff on international norms, integrating these norms into local legislation, and establishing monitoring and accountability mechanisms to ensure compliance . Collaboration with international bodies and human rights organizations can provide additional support and expertise. Additionally, fostering a culture of respect for human rights within prison administrations and among staff is crucial. Policies should be developed to address resource limitations and infrastructural challenges, ensuring that practices align with both local realities and international expectations .