0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views7 pages

Piping System Pressure Drop Analysis

This document outlines a problem-solving session focused on determining the pressure drop and required pipe diameter for a water delivery system using the Crane method. It includes given data, assumptions, and a step-by-step iterative solution process to find the appropriate pipe diameter based on specified flow rates and system parameters. The final outcome confirms the successful calculation of the pipe diameter necessary to achieve the desired volumetric flow rate.

Uploaded by

Jones-e-learning
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views7 pages

Piping System Pressure Drop Analysis

This document outlines a problem-solving session focused on determining the pressure drop and required pipe diameter for a water delivery system using the Crane method. It includes given data, assumptions, and a step-by-step iterative solution process to find the appropriate pipe diameter based on specified flow rates and system parameters. The final outcome confirms the successful calculation of the pipe diameter necessary to achieve the desired volumetric flow rate.

Uploaded by

Jones-e-learning
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Piping Engineering

Week Name Piping System Components: Single-phase Pressure Drop


Topic Name Problem Solving - 1

Menu Name: Learning Outcome


Learning Outcome:
At the end of this session, you should be able to
 Determine the pressure drop of a piping system consisting of
pipelines, valves and fittings
 Determine either flow rate through the pipe or diameter of the
pipe iteratively based on the type of the problem

Menu Name: Problem Solving


Consider a piping system as shown here to deliver water flow from a
reservoir at a higher elevation z1 = 60 m to a reservoir at a lower
elevation z2 = 6.0 m. The static pressures (Gauge) at the inlet and exit of
the piping system are P1 = 500 kPa and P2 = 100 kPa, respectively. The
total length of the pipe is L = 200 m and it consists of two gate valves,
one globe valve, and four elbows. Neglect the resistance offered by
elbows against the water flow in this problem. What diameter of
commercial steel pipe would be required to deliver 0.02 m3/s of water?
Use the Crane method.
Take:
Density of water, ρ = 988 kg/m3
Dynamic viscosity of water, µ = 0.001002 kg/m-s

© 2022 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED. All rights reserved


Sensitivity: LNT Construction General Business
Menu Name: Given Data

Given data:
Pipe Material: Commercial Steel
The total length of pipe, L = 200 m
Pipe inlet elevation, z1 = 60m
Pipe outlet elevation, z2 = 6m
The static pressure at the inlet of the piping system, P1 = 500 kPa (gauge)
The static pressure at the outlet of the piping system, P2 = 100 kPa (gauge)
The desired flow rate in the pipe, Q̇ = 0.02 m3/s

Menu Name: Assumptions

Neglect the head loss due to the presence of elbows.


Flow is at a steady state and fluid is incompressible.
To find Pipe diameter, D.

Menu Name: Solution


Let us apply Bernoulli’s equation including the head loss due to
friction of the pipe, head loss due to the resistance offered by the
valves, and head loss offered at the entrance and exit of the pipe.
Head loss offered by the elbows is not included in the equation.
No pump is required for the water to flow in the pipe.
The driving force for water flow is static pressure head and
elevation difference.

© 2022 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED. All rights reserved


Sensitivity: LNT Construction General Business
P1 u21 P2 u22
+ + z1 = + + z2 + hPipe + hValves + hEntry + hExit
ρg 2g ρg 2g

• At sectional plane 1-1 the velocity of water at the entry of the


piping system is zero, u1 = 0.
• At sectional plane 2-2, the average velocity of water at the exit of
the piping system is u2.
u22 u21 u22 u22
• Therefore, the change in kinetic energy, − = −0=
2g 2g 2g 2g

• The modified Bernoulli’s equation can be written by replacing the


head loss terms with their corresponding terms and substituting
u22
change in KE is equal to , the equation becomes
2g

P1 P2 u22 L u2 u2
+ z1 = + + z2 + fD + 2 �K Gate Valve �+
ρg ρg 2g D 2g 2g
u2 u2 u2
�K Globe Valve 2g
�+ �K Entrance 2g� + �K Exit
2g

• Let us rearrange the modified Bernoulli equation. The rearranged


P1 P2 u2 L
equation is − + (z1 − z2 ) = �1 + fD + 2K Gate Valve +
ρg ρg 2g D
K Globe Valve + K Entrance + K Exit �.
• It is interesting to analyze the modified Bernoulli’s equation
mentioned here.
• The left-hand term is the sum of the static pressure head and the
difference in the potential head.
• Whereas the sum of right-hand terms is the change in KE, and the
net resistance offered by the pipe, valves, entry, and exit against
the water flow in the pipe.
• To maintain the desired water flow rate for the selected pipe
diameter, LHS terms must be balanced with RHS terms.
• To find out the right pipe diameter an iterative procedure should
be adopted.

© 2022 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED. All rights reserved


Sensitivity: LNT Construction General Business
• From the table as shown here, for β = 1, where β is the ratio of
the downstream pipe diameter to upstream pipe diameter that is
D2 D
= = 1.
D1 D
• Loss coefficient for Gate valve: K Gate Valve = 8fT .
• Loss coefficient for Globe valve: K Globe Valve = 340fT .
• Loss coefficient for Entrance.
• K Entrance = 0.8
• Loss coefficient for Exit.
• K Exit = 1.0
• Substituting of respective loss coefficient of valves, entrance, and
exit of pipe in Bernoulli’s equation yields the following equation.
P1 P2 u2 L
− + (z1 − z2 ) = �1 + fD + 2x8fT + 340fT + 0.8 + 1.0�
ρg ρg 2g D

• Rearranging,
P1 P2 u2 L
− + (z1 − z2 ) = �fD + 356fT + 2.8�
ρg ρg 2g D
• Take atmospheric pressure, 100kPa.
• Let us substitute P1, P2, z1 ,and z2 in the simplified Bernoulli
equation.
• Here the absolute value of pressures are P1 = 500 + 100 = 600kPa
(600−200)x1000 u2 L
+ (60 − 6) = �fD + 356fT + 2.8�
998x9.81 2g D
u2 L
95 = �fD + 356fT + 2.8�
2g D
• Here, u is a function of pipe diameter, D
• For the rightly chosen pipe diameter,
u2 L
95 − �fD + 356fT + 1.5�
2g D
should be equal to zero.
ϵ 0.0457 L 200
= = 0.000914, , = = 4000
D 50 D 0.05
• The velocity of water in the 50 mm commercial steel pipe can be
determined from the given volumetric flow rate, Q̇ .
Q̇ 0.02
• Therefore velocity, u = = = 10.182 m/s
A 0.001964

© 2022 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED. All rights reserved


Sensitivity: LNT Construction General Business
Menu Name: Iteration: 1

• Let us follow the following iterative procedure:


Iteration: 1
• Initially consider the pipe diameter, D = 50 mm
• The cross-sectional area of the pipe,
π 2 22 50 2
A= D = x� � = 0.001964 m2
4 28 1000
• The roughness of the commercial steel pipe, ε from the given table
is 0.0457 mm.
ρuD 998x10.182x0.05
• Reynolds Number, Re = = = 507058
μ 0.00102

Menu Name: Solution

• Let us use the Selander, 1978 friction factor correlation to find out
the friction factor, fD for the pipe.
10 −2
• Therefore, fD = 4 �3.8 log � + 0.2ϵ/D�� =0.0203
Re
• Now, let us select the fT value from the table.
• For a clean commercial steel pipe, the friction factor for complete
turbulence for the pipe size of 50 mm is obtained from the table as
presented here. The friction factor, fT = 0.019.
• Substitute the values of u, fD, L, D, and fT in the equation,
u2 L
95 − �fD + 356fT + 2.8� and find out the difference.
2g D
• If the difference is within an acceptable range, then the assumed
pipe diameter is correct, otherwise, steps 1 to 8 should be
repeated with updated pipe diameter till the difference falls within
an acceptable range.
• Let us find out the difference.
10.1822
95 − [0.0203x4000 + 356x0.019 + 1.5] = -385 m
2x9.81
© 2022 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED. All rights reserved
Sensitivity: LNT Construction General Business
• The difference is 385 m which is not acceptable.

Menu Name: Iteration: 2

• Therefore let us go for the second iteration.


• Pipe diameter assumption, D = 68.97 mm
• The Cross-sectional area of the pipe,
π 2 22 68.97 2
A= D = x� � = 0.00374 m2
4 28 1000
• The roughness of the commercial steel pipe, ε from the given table
is 0.0457 mm
ϵ 0.0457 L 200
= = 0.000663, = = 2900
D 68.97 D 0.06897
• The velocity of water in the 68.97 mm commercial steel pipe can
be determined from the given volumetric flow rate, Q̇ .
Q̇ 0.02
• Therefore velocity, u = = = 5.351 m/s
A 0.00374
ρuD 998x5.351x0.06897
• Reynolds Number, Re = = = 367594
μ 0.00102
• Let us use the Selander, 1978 friction factor correlation to find out
the friction factor, fD for the pipe.
10 −2
• Therefore, fD = 4 �3.8 log � + 0.2ϵ/D�� =0.0192
Re
• Now, let us select the fT value from the table. For a clean
commercial steel pipe, the friction factor for complete turbulence
for the pipe size of 68.97mm is obtained from the table as
presented here. The friction factor, fT = 0.01837.
• Substitute the values of u, fD, L, D and fT in the equation,
u2 L
95 − �fD + 356fT + 2.8� and find out the difference.
2g D
• If the difference is within an acceptable range, then the assumed
pipe diameter is correct, otherwise steps 1 to 8 should be repeated
with updated pipe diameter till the difference falls within an
acceptable range.

© 2022 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED. All rights reserved


Sensitivity: LNT Construction General Business
• Let us find out the difference.
• That is
5.3512
95 − [0.0192x2900 + 356x0.01837 + 2.8] = 0.039m
2x9.81
• The difference is 0.039m which is acceptable.

Menu Name: Summary


• Solved iteratively a typical piping system problem using the Crane
method.
• Determined the pipe diameter for a given volumetric flow rate of
fluid

© 2022 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED. All rights reserved


Sensitivity: LNT Construction General Business

Common questions

Powered by AI

Reynolds Number (Re) is a dimensionless parameter that indicates whether flow is laminar or turbulent, influencing the calculation of the friction factor in fluid dynamics. In the context of piping systems, it helps determine the applicable correlation or formula for calculating the friction factor (fD). For instance, using the Selander correlation, the friction factor is computed as a function of the Reynolds Number, which is critical for accurately assessing the head loss due to friction within the system .

An iterative procedure is used because the relationship between flow rate, pipe diameter, and head loss involves complex parameters that depend on assumed values such as diameter and friction factor. A successful iteration is signified when the calculated difference between the left-hand side and right-hand side of the modified Bernoulli’s equation falls within an acceptable range, indicating that the assumed pipe diameter yields a flow rate that correctly balances energy and loss .

The iterative method is highly effective under complex conditions due to its adaptability in refining calculations to meet specific accurate results. Unlike direct calculation methods, which assume fixed conditions and may not capture variability in system components and complex interdependencies, iterative procedures account for nuanced interplay between parameters such as friction factor, Reynolds Number, and flow resistances, providing a tailored approach that directly aligns calculation results with physical system behaviors .

Selecting the correct friction factor value is crucial because it significantly impacts the calculation of head loss due to pipe friction. Errors in friction factor selection can lead to inaccurate pressure drop calculations, resulting in selecting incorrect pipe sizes, which might either be insufficient for delivering the desired flow or overly excessive, increasing cost. The friction factor depends on factors like pipe material, size, surface roughness, and Reynolds Number, thus proper selection ensures accurate and efficient system design .

The assumptions made include considering the fluid (water) to be incompressible and the flow to be steady-state. Additionally, it is assumed that the head loss due to elbows is negligible, simplifying the number of components contributing to energy loss in the system calculations. These assumptions reduce the complexity of calculations by focusing only on major loss factors such as changes in pressure and elevation .

Changes in pipe diameter inversely affect the velocity of water through the continuity equation (Q = A*u), where a larger diameter reduces velocity for a given flow rate, and a smaller diameter increases it. This velocity is a critical factor in calculating pressure drops, as the kinetic energy of the flow and the associated frictional losses depend on velocity squared (u2²). Therefore, accurately determining pipe diameter directly influences velocity calculations and consequent pressure drop estimations .

The cross-sectional area of a pipe (A = πD²/4) is used alongside the volumetric flow rate (Q̇ = A * u) to determine the flow velocity (u) inside the pipe. This calculation is fundamental because it defines the kinetic energy of the fluid and affects head loss estimations and Reynolds Number calculations, which in turn influence the determination of other pipe parameters such as diameter and material needed to achieve efficient system design .

Potential head changes, indicated by elevation differences (z1 - z2), directly impact the total energy available to drive fluid flow through a piping system. In the Bernoulli's equation, the pressure difference must balance these changes along with kinetic and frictional losses. Increases in elevation heighten pressure demands, whereas decreases allow greater relative drop, impacting needed pressure supply from valves and pumps .

The modified Bernoulli's equation includes terms for head loss due to friction of the pipe and resistance offered by valves, entrance, and exit of the pipe. It is written as P1/ρg + z1 = P2/ρg + u2²/2g + z2 + fD(L/D)u2²/2g + 2KGate Valveu2²/2g + KGlobe Valveu2²/2g + KEntranceu2²/2g + KExitu2²/2g. This modification is necessary because in real systems, these factors provide significant resistance to flow and affect the system's ability to maintain desired flow rates. The equation ensures that the static pressure head and potential head are balanced with kinetic energy changes and head losses to find the correct pipe diameter .

Loss coefficients for valves and fittings quantify the resistance each component adds to fluid flow. They are indices that represent the amount of energy lost at junctions and fixtures compared to friction in straight pipe sections. These coefficients are incorporated into the modified Bernoulli's equation, where each type of component's loss is summed up and expressed in terms of head loss contributing to the overall pressure drop, thus impacting the balance needed to maintain desired flow rates .

You might also like