Characteristics of Quantitative Research
1. Objective
- Quantitative research strives for objectivity, meaning the researcher remains unbiased.
- The primary goal is to achieve accurate measurement and analysis of the research topic.
- Personal opinions or perspectives are not factored into the findings.
2. Clearly Defined Research Questions:
- Quantitative research requires specific and well-defined research questions.
- These questions guide the data collection process and ensure objective answers are
obtained.
3. Structured Research Instruments:
- Structured research tools like questionnaires are used to collect data.
- These instruments gather measurable characteristics of the population, such as age,
gender, or religion.
- Closed-ended questions are typically used to facilitate data measurement.
4. Numerical Data:
- Quantitative research relies heavily on numerical data and statistics.
- This data is organized and presented using tables, charts, graphs, and figures.
- This format helps to consolidate large amounts of data, revealing trends, relationships,
and differences among variables.
5. Large Sample Sizes:
- To ensure reliable data analysis, quantitative research typically involves large sample
sizes
- The number of respondents is determined based on the variability of the population's
characteristics.
- Researchers often employ random sampling techniques to maintain objectivity in the
results.
6. Replication:
- Reliable quantitative research can be replicated or repeated to verify and confirm the
results in different settings.
- This involves replicating the original study's process with a different set of participants,
time, or location.
- The goal is to determine if the original findings remain consistent under different
circumstances.
7. Future Outcomes:
- Using complex mathematical calculations and computer analysis, quantitative research
can:
- Generalize concepts broadly
- Predict future outcomes
- Investigate causal relationships
- Data collected from a sample is analyzed to make generalizations and predictions about
the larger population.
Strengths of Quantitative Research
- Objectivity: Quantitative research aims for unbiased results, minimizing
misinterpretation due to the use of numerical data.
- Statistical Analysis: Statistical techniques enable sophisticated analysis, allowing
researchers to understand vast amounts of data and identify vital characteristics.
- Easy Analysis: Numerical data can be analyzed quickly and easily, facilitating the
identification of trends, relationships, and differences among variables.
- Replicability: Quantitative research can be replicated using standardized approaches,
allowing for the verification of findings in different settings or over time.
Weaknesses of Quantitative Research
- Large Sample Size Requirement: Quantitative research often requires a large number
of respondents to ensure statistically accurate findings.
- Costly: Gathering data from a large sample size can be expensive due to the cost of
reaching out to respondents and producing questionnaires.
- Limited Contextual Information: Quantitative research often ignores contextual factors
that could help interpret results or explain variations.
- Difficult to Gather Sensitive Data: Structured research instruments may struggle to
gather information on sensitive topics, as respondents may be uncomfortable answering
closed-ended questions.
- Potential for Inaccurate Data: Data from questionnaires can be incomplete or
inaccurate if respondents do not complete them seriously or correctly.
Kinds of Quantitative Research
- Descriptive Research
- Focuses on describing the nature, characteristics, and components of a population or
phenomenon.
- Aims to determine the frequency of occurrences in the current situation.
- Examples:
- Determining the average number of hours students spend on social media.
- Finding the number of malnourished students who failed an achievement test.
- Assessing the healthiness of food served during recess in public schools.
- Correlational Research:
- Investigates the nature of relationships or associations between variables without
exploring causal reasons.
- Determines the extent of relationships between or among variables.
- Examples:
- Investigating if review program results can predict performance on the University of the
Philippines College Admission Test (UPCAT).
- Exploring the relationship between sex and mathematical ability.
- Examining the connection between marriage and cancer recovery.
- Evaluation Research:
- Assesses the effects, impacts, or outcomes of practices, policies, and programs.
- Evaluates the effectiveness and efficiency of interventions.
- Examples:
- Assessing leadership ability in a community.
- Determining the impact of a new teaching procedure on student learning.
- Survey Research:
- Gathers information from groups of people by selecting and studying samples.
- Can be conducted through various methods like face-to-face, phone, mail, or online.
- Causal Comparative Research (Ex Post Factor):
- Derives conclusions from observations and events that have already occurred in the past.
- Compares groups with pre-existing characteristics to determine the effect of those
characteristics on dependent variables.
- Examples:
- Investigating how weight influences stress-coping levels in adults.
- Experimental Research:
- Employs the scientific method to test cause-and-effect relationships under controlled
conditions.
- Manipulates an independent variable to determine its effect on dependent variables.
- Examples:
- Determining if a new teaching strategy is effective by comparing the achievement of
students taught using the new strategy to those taught without it.
Qualitative and Quantitative Variables
I. Definition of Variables:
- Variables are changing qualities or characteristics of persons or things.
- Example: A person's hairstyle is a variable (straight vs. curly).
II. Qualitative vs. Quantitative Variables:
- Qualitative:
- Variables that take on values that are names or labels.
- Example: Shirt color (red, green, blue) or size (small, medium, large).
- Quantitative:
- Variables that are numeric and represent a measurable quantity.
- Example: Population of a school (number of people).
III. Types of Qualitative Variables:
- Nominal:
- Categorizes attributes without ordering.
- Example: Gender, skin color, blood type.
- Ordinal:
- Categorizes attributes with an order or rank.
- Examples:
- Level of satisfaction with a service (very satisfied, satisfied, indifferent, dissatisfied,
very dissatisfied).
- Ranking of students in a class.
IV. Types of Quantitative Variables:
- Interval:
- Values measured along a scale with equal distances between points.
- Addition and subtraction operations can be performed.
- Example: Temperature in Celsius or Fahrenheit (0°C or 0°F doesn't mean no
temperature).
- Ratio:
- Numeric variables with a true zero point.
- All arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division) can be
performed.
- Examples: Height in feet and inches, weight in kilograms, time spent on the internet daily.
Dependent and Independent Variables
I. Defining Variables in Research:
- A variable is either a cause or an effect of a change in another variable.
- In experiments, these are called dependent and independent variables.
II. Independent Variables (IV):
- Suspected Cause: IVs are suspected of being the cause in a causal relationship.
- Active IVs: Interventions or conditions applied to participants (e.g., teaching strategy,
therapy, training program).
- Attribute IVs: Intrinsic characteristics of participants (e.g., gender, age, socioeconomic
status).
- Predictor Variable: In predictive questions, the IV may be called a predictor variable,
where it is thought to predict another variable.
III. Dependent Variables (DV):
- Outcome Variable: DVs are influenced by the IV.
- Result of Intervention: DVs represent the outcome or result of the IV's influence.
- Receives the Intervention: DVs are the participants or subjects that receive the
intervention (or experience the change).
- Outcome Variable: In predictive questions, the DV may be called an outcome variable,
where it is the variable that is being predicted or influenced.
IV. Examples of Variables in Research:
- Experimental Research: The IV is manipulated by the experimenter to measure its effect
on the DV.
- Example: A doctor studying a new medication for hypertension (IV: type of pill; DV:
blood pressure).
- Non-experimental Research: IVs are not directly manipulated but are examined for their
influence on the DV.
- Example: A government officer examining the impact of a minimum wage increase on
worker wages (IV: minimum wage increase; DV: weekly wage growth).
The Quantitative Research Problem
I. Definition:
- A research topic or problem is an intellectual stimulus calling for an answer in the form
of scientific inquiry.
- It is a general question about relations among variables that you need to undertake as a
researcher.
- A quantitative research problem is any researchable research problem geared toward a
possible result.
II. Sources of Quantitative Research Problems:
- Personal Experiences and Interests: Your everyday personal or professional
experiences can inspire research ideas.
- Related Studies and Literature: Reading books, journal articles, and newspapers can
reveal gaps in knowledge or inconsistencies in existing research that warrant further
investigation.
- Prevailing Theories and Philosophies: Beliefs and ideas of the people around us may
lead you to conduct a study to test or explore them.
- Funding Agencies: Some research problems are suggested by government or non-
government institutions who provide funding for research-based data.
III. Criteria for a Good Quantitative Research Problem (FINER):
- Feasible:
- The research should be realistic in scope and scale.
- You must have the necessary materials and resources to conduct the study.
- The research problem must be clear and focused for feasibility.
- Interesting:
- You should be genuinely interested in the research problem with passion and
commitment.
- Novel:
- The research problem should not simply copy previous studies but aim to:
- Confirm or refute existing findings.
- Establish new facts.
- Explore new aspects of known facts.
- The research question should not be answerable with a simple "yes" or "no".
- Ethical:
- Research must be approved by appropriate authorities.
- It should minimize harm to participants.
- Protect participant privacy and confidentiality.
- Ensure participants' right to withdraw.
- Avoid deceptive practices.
- Relevant:
- The research question should be of academic and intellectual interest to people in your
chosen field of study.
The Research Title
I. Definition:
- The research title summarizes the main idea or ideas of your study.
- It is the most important element that defines the research study because it's read first
and most often.
II. Guidelines for Formulating a Research Title:
- Comprehensive: The title must be broad enough to include all aspects of your study,
including:
- Subject matter or research problem
- Setting or locale
- Respondents or participants
- Time or period of the study
- Concise:
- The title should be brief and to the point, avoiding excessive detail.
- Aim for a title with no more than 15 substantive words.
- Avoid unnecessary phrases like "An investigation of..." or "A study of...".
- Specific:
- Be precise in your wording, avoiding overly broad or vague terms.
- Clearly indicate the focus of your study.
The Background of Research
I. Purpose:
- The background of research establishes the context for your study, explaining why your
research topic is important and essential to investigate.
- It justifies the need for conducting the research and summarizes what the study aims to
achieve.
II. Contents of the Background of Research:
- Research Justification:
- Provides critical background or contextual information that introduces your topic area.
- Explains why your research is important by presenting a central concern to which your
research relates.
- Summary of the Literature Review:
- Includes a review of existing literature on your research area, leading up to your topic.
- Discusses the contributions of other researchers in the field and identifies gaps in their
research.
- Explains how your study will address these gaps and contribute to the existing
knowledge in the field.
- Research Aim or Objective:
- A concise statement at the end of the literature review indicating the general aim or
purpose of your research project.
- Summary of the Research Design:
- Explains how your research aims will be achieved, including:
- Methods used (interviews, surveys, video observation, etc.)
- Phases of the research (if applicable)
- Data analysis techniques
III. Example Background of Research:
- Research Title: Correlation Between the Entrance Exam Results of Students under the
College of Computing and Information Technologies (CCIT) National University, Manila,
Philippines, and their accumulated GWA and the number of units earned.
- Background of the Research:
- Research Justification: College admission exams are standardized examinations that
determine students' chance of pursuing a degree in an academic institution (Bai, Chi, &Qian,
2014).
- Summary of the Literature Review: Studies have been conducted to understand whether
the result of admission exams would mean success in completing their degree. Some
studies have shown that a good admission test can predict the students' academic ability
to succeed in his/her chosen program.
- Research Aim/Objective: This paper will determine whether the student entrance
examination of National University can predict the academic performance of the College
of Computing and Information Technologies.
- Summary of Research Design: Since there were two instruments (old and new) used for
the entrance exams, this paper will produce separate outputs for the two instruments.
IV. Key Points:
- The background of research is a crucial section that sets the stage for your study.
- It provides context, justification, and a clear statement of your research aims.
- A well-written background of research effectively communicates the importance and
relevance of your study to readers.
Research Questions
I. Definition:
- Research questions are subparts of the main research problem, also called sub-problems.
- The answers to these questions contribute to resolving the overall research problem.
II. Characteristics of Research Questions:
- Complementary to the Research Problem: Your research questions should be directly
linked to your research problem, covering all significant areas of the problem statement.
- Researchable Units: Each research question should be a complete researchable unit that
could be explored as a separate study.
- Data Interpretation Focused: Research questions should lead to data analysis and
interpretation, not just procedural or process questions (e.g., "What is the best way to
choose a sample?" is not a valid research question).
- Not Answerable by "Yes" or "No": Avoid questions that can be answered with a simple
yes or no. Aim for questions that require deeper exploration and analysis.
III. Examples of Research Questions:
Example 1:
- Research Problem: The relationship of writing anxiety and writing proficiency of senior
high school students in Rizal High School, Pasig City during the first semester of school
year 2019-2020.
- Research Questions:
What is the level of writing anxiety of the senior high school students?
What is the level of writing proficiency of the senior high school students?
Is there a significant relationship between the writing anxiety and writing proficiency of
the senior high school students?
Example 2:
- Research Problem: The effect of the outcome-based-teaching-learning approach on
student performance in the technical drawing subject of technician students in the
technical subject.
- Research Questions:
What is the mean pretest score of the experimental group and control group in the final
examination in the technical subject?
What is the mean posttest score of the experimental group and control group in the final
examination in the technical subject?
What is the mean gain in score from pretest to posttest for the two groups?
Is the outcome-based-teaching and learning (OBTL) approach effective?
IV. Key Points:
- Well-constructed research questions guide your data collection and analysis.
- They help you to focus your research and ensure that you are addressing the most
important aspects of your research problem.
Scope and Delimitation of Study
- Scope:
- Defines the coverage of the research area.
- Includes facts and theories about the target participants
- To determine the scope, consider the following questions:
- Why (General Purpose): What are the overall aims and objectives of the research?
- What (Topic): What is the specific topic of investigation?
- Where (Location): Where is the study taking place?
- When (Timeframe): When will the data be collected?
- Who (Subject/Population): Who are the participants in the study?
- How (Methodology): How will the research be conducted (research design, methods,
tools, analysis)?
- Delimitation:
- Sets the boundaries of the study, limiting the scope.
- Includes factors that are not part of the research, such as:
- Sample size: The number of participants included in the study.
- Time: The timeframe within which the study will be conducted.
- Geographic area: The specific location where the study is conducted
- Exclusions: Specific factors or variables that are deliberately not included in the study.
- It's important to clearly explain your decisions for excluding certain factors.
The Problem and Its Background of the Research Paper
- Definition:
- This is the first chapter of your research paper, often titled "Introduction" or "Problem
and Its Setting".
- It provides a detailed explanation of the research problem and its background, setting
the stage for your study.
- The specific title depends on the format and standards of your institution or agency.
- Elements:
- Background of the Study:
- Presents the rationale for choosing the research topic.
- Describes the situations and conditions that led to your decision to conduct the study.
- Statement of the Problem/Statement of Purpose:
- Outlines the problem or objectives of the research.
- Includes both the main (general) problem and the sub-problems (specific).
- The general problem typically starts with "This study..." while sub-problems begin with
"Specifically, this study...".
- Significance of the Study:
- Justifies your study by explaining its potential contributions.
- Identifies the potential beneficiaries of the research and the possible uses of the results.
- Scope and Delimitation of the Study:
- Sets the boundaries of your study, indicating:
- Who (Subjects): The participants (population and sample).
- What (Variables): The variables being studied.
- When (Timeframe): The time period of the study.
- Where (Locale): The location of the study.
- How (Methodology): A brief overview of the research methodology.
- Exclusions: Factors or variables not included in the study.
- Guidelines for Presentation:
- Convincing: The presentation should persuade the audience to support the research.
- Justified: The problem should be significant and well-supported by evidence.
- Clear Communication: Use simple, clear, and precise language.
- Organized: Present your thoughts in a logical and structured manner.
Review of Related Literature
I. Purpose:
- A literature review is a crucial part of any research paper, providing a foundation for
your study.
- It draws from books, magazines, scholarly papers, and other sources to synthesize,
summarize, describe, evaluate, and connect parallel ideas to your research topic.
- A well-crafted review provides the basis for your study.
II. Purposes of a Literature Review:
- Learning and Understanding: Gain insights into concepts, ideas, and theories related to
your study, connecting them to your own research paper.
- Supporting Evidence: Provide a basis for proving the correctness and relevance of your
research topic.
- Terminology Expansion: Learn new terms and definitions relevant to your study.
- Connecting to Past Research: Establish the link between previous research (theses,
dissertations) and your current study.
- Current Context: Understand how your paper connects to the current situation in your
country and the world.
III. Selecting Relevant Literature:
- Examine the Title: A good title should be specific and include the major variables of
the study.
- Screening for Inclusion: Assess the applicability of identified studies and decide
whether to include or exclude them based on their relevance to your research.
- Extracting Data: Gather applicable information from each primary study included in the
review.
- Analyzing and Synthesizing Data: Organize, compare, collate, summarize, aggregate, or
interpret the extracted information to suggest a new contribution to the body of knowledge.
IV. Citing Related Literature Using Standard Styles:
- Acknowledge Sources: When taking notes for your literature review, include citation
information to credit authors.
- Common Citation Styles:
- APA (American Psychological Association): Author/date-based (Author, date) or Author
(Date)
- MLA (Modern Language Association): Author and page (Author page), Author (page)
- AMA (American Medical Association) or Vancouver: Numbering with either square
brackets or curved brackets, ensuring consistency (e.g., Research is fun! [1])
- Chicago Manual of Style:
- Author-Date System: (Author 2012) or Author (2012)
- Notes-Bibliography System: Mainly used in historical papers, similar to APA in-text
citations.
Conceptual Framework
I. Definition:
- The conceptual framework serves as the blueprint for your research, outlining your plan
and guiding your study.
- It helps you visualize the relationships between variables and how they will be
investigated.
- It is often represented through diagrams, charts, or maps, and may include an
accompanying narrative explanation.
II. Nature and Purposes:
- Blueprint/Skeleton/Plan: The conceptual framework guides you throughout your
research, outlining the steps you will take and the variables you will investigate.
- Describing Observations: You can incorporate your observations (events or situations
you encounter while gathering data) into the framework, especially in the narrative part.
- Clarifying Ideas and Relationships: The framework helps readers understand your
research, showing the connections between variables and explaining the rationale for your
study.
- Development of Theory: The framework may lead to the development of new or
refined theories as you compare and contrast different ideas and variables.
- Providing Conditions and Expected Results: The framework outlines the conditions of
your study and includes expected results based on your plan.
III. Procedure for Creating a Conceptual Framework:
Define Your Topic: Ensure your topic aligns with your field of specialization.
Conduct a Literature Review: Search for relevant and reliable sources to support your
research.
Identify Key Variables: While reviewing literature, identify important variables
connected to your topic.
Develop Your Plan: Create a conceptual framework, outlining the steps of your research:
- Input: The information or data you need to gather for your research.
- Process: The steps you will take to gather and analyze the data.
- Output: The expected results and outcomes of your research.
IV. Example Conceptual Framework:
- IPO (Input-Process-Output) Format: A common format for presenting a conceptual
framework.
- Diagram: A visual representation of the framework, often using arrows or lines to
illustrate relationships.
- Narrative Explanation: A written description of the framework, summarizing the
variables and how they relate to your hypothesis.
A Narrative Explanation of Conceptual Framework
I. Purpose:
- The narrative explanation provides a written description of the conceptual framework
diagram, offering a more detailed explanation of the research plan.
II. Purposes of Narrative Conceptual Framework:
- Walkthrough: Explains in detail the elements shown in the diagram, starting with the
research topic and moving to variables, methodology, and expected results.
- Clarifying Connections: Provides a clear explanation of the relationships between
variables, especially those represented by arrows or lines in the diagram.
- Literature and Studies: Incorporates related literature and studies to support the
framework, explaining how they connect to the current research.
- Expanding on the Diagram: Goes beyond the diagram by providing additional
information about the research plan, methodology, and anticipated outcomes.
- Flexibility and Revision: Allows for adjustments to the framework if new information
or changes in research plans arise.
III. Guidelines for Composing Narrative Conceptual Framework:
State Your Topic: Begin by clearly stating the research topic, providing context for the
reader.
Refer to Your Diagram: Refer to the diagrammatic version of the conceptual framework,
guiding the reader through the visual representation.
Explain the Variables: Explain the variables included in the diagram and their
relationships, clarifying the connections between boxes and arrows/lines.
Use Literature: Incorporate relevant literature and studies to support your framework,
demonstrating the basis for your research.
Describe Methodology: Explain the research methodology you plan to use, providing
detailed information about the methods and data analysis techniques.
Discuss Expected Outcomes: Outline the expected results or outcomes of the research
based on the framework.
Return and Revise: Highlight the flexibility of the conceptual framework and explain
how revisions might be made as new information emerges or research plans change.
Definition of Terms
- Purpose: The Definition of Terms section acts like a dictionary for your research paper,
clarifying unfamiliar terms, jargon, or specialized words used in your study, making it
easier for readers to understand your work.
- Types of Definitions:
- Conceptual Definition: The universally accepted definition of a term, often based on
dictionary definitions or established sources.
- Operational Definition: Defines a term based on how it is specifically used in your study,
describing its observable characteristics or functions within your research context.
- Principles for Writing Definitions:
- Focus on What Something Is: Describe the essence of a term rather than its effects or
uses.
- Be Precise and Comprehensive: Extend the definition to cover the specific meaning you
want readers to understand.
- Supplement with Clarification: Provide additional details or examples to clarify the
meaning further.
- Avoid Inventing Definitions: Don't create new definitions for terms that already
haveclear and accepted meanings.
- Maintain Consistency: Once you establish a definition, don't change its meaning within the
research paper.
Research Hypothesis
- Definition: A research hypothesis is a prediction of the answer to your research
question(s). It typically focuses on the relationship between two variables used in the study.
It guides data collection and interpretation, providing direction to the research.
- Nature of Hypothesis:
- Testable/Falsifiable: It can be tested and potentially proven false.
- Logical: It follows a logical reasoning process.
- Related to the Research Problem: It directly addresses the research problem.
- Not Moral or Ethical: It avoids moral or ethical questions.
- Specific, but not Too General: It is clear and focused, but not overly broad or narrow.
- Predictive: It predicts the outcome of the study.
- Limits the Scope: It helps define the boundaries of the research.
- Valuable Even if False: Even if proven false, a hypothesis can contribute to knowledge.
- Purpose and Importance of Hypothesis in Research:
- Provides a Tentative Explanation: Offers a possible explanation for phenomena, which
can be further investigated.
- Directs Research: Guides the research process and helps ensure that the study is focused
and relevant.
- Facilitates Knowledge Extension: Contributes to the expansion of knowledge in the field.
- Provides a Framework for Reporting Conclusions: Helps structure the reporting of
research findings.
- Acts as a Working Instrument of Theory: Can be deducted from existing theories and
other hypotheses.
- Types of Hypotheses:
- Null Hypothesis (H0): Represents a theory that has not been proven, stating there is no
significant relationship or difference between variables.
- Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): States that something is happening, proposing a new
theory or relationship between variables, opposing the null hypothesis.
- Generation of Research Hypothesis:
- Process:
- Research Problem: Identify the research problem.
- Information Gathering: Collect relevant information from observations, stock knowledge,
and related literature/studies.
- Statement of the Problem: Formulate the statement of the problem (general problem
and specific objectives).
- Research Paradigm: Create a conceptual framework or research paradigm.
- Hypothesis: Develop hypotheses based on the research paradigm and statement of the
problem.
- Example:
- Research Problem: Is free Facebook messenger effective in conducting P.E. classes?
- Hypothesis: Facebook messenger is not an effective medium in conducting P.E. classes.
Present Written Review of Related Literature and Conceptual Framework
I. Purpose:
- This lesson focuses on presenting a complete written review of related literature and a
conceptual framework for your research.
- It combines the skills you've learned in previous lessons about selecting and
synthesizing literature, creating a conceptual framework, and formulating a hypothesis.
II. Synthesizing Related Literature:
- Combining Information: Synthesize means combining multiple pieces of information into
a coherent whole. This involves:
- Gathering relevant literature and studies.
- Taking notes, analyzing, paraphrasing, and summarizing the key points.
- Comparing and contrasting different sources to show their similarities and differences.
-Relating the sources to your current research problem.
- Review of Literature Purpose: The review serves as a foundation for your study. It:
- Provides evidence and references to support your research.
- Guides readers in understanding your rationale for conducting the research.
- Identifies gaps in existing research and how your study will address them.
- Analyzes and synthesizes related literature in the context of your research problem and
framework.
III. Techniques for Writing a Synthesis:
- Summary: A straightforward approach, presenting relevant information from different
sources one after another.
- Example or Illustration: Provide examples or illustrations to clarify the connections
between different sources.
- Two (or more) reasons: State your research topic or objective and provide reasons why it
is true, timely, or relevant, supported by evidence from your sources.
- Comparison and Contrast: Thoroughly examine your sources, exploring their similarities
and differences to highlight key insights and inform your research.
IV. Guidelines for Writing a Literature Review:
- Refer to the Statement of the Problem: Follow the order of variables in your statement
of the problem to structure your review.
- Avoid Copying and Pasting: Synthesize information into your own words.
- Cite Sources Correctly: Use the appropriate citation style consistently.
- Align Citations and References: Make sure all citations in the body of your review are
included in your reference list.
- Connect to Research Purpose: Provide a clear and concise introduction, explaining the
purpose of your study and how the review relates to it.
V. Creating a Conceptual Framework:
- Use Synthesized Information: Based on your synthesized review, create a conceptual
framework that:
- Outlines your research plan, including key variables and their relationships.
- Represents the relationships between variables using diagrams, charts, or maps.
- Provides a narrative explanation to clarify the framework and its connection to your
research problem.
VI. Presenting the Literature Review and Conceptual Framework:
- Organized Structure: Present a clear and logical structure, typically including:
- Introduction: Introduce the topic, your research question, and the purpose of the review.
- Body: Present the synthesized information from your sources, grouped by themes,
theoretical perspectives, methodological approaches, or chronological development.
- Conclusion: Summarize the key findings from the review, highlight any gaps in the
literature, and connect the review to your conceptual framework.
VII. Key Points:
- A well-crafted review of related literature and a clear conceptual framework are
essential for a strong research paper.
- These elements provide a foundation for your study, guide your methodology, and help
readers understand the rationale and logic of your research.