0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views4 pages

Jeepney Modernization Costs and Impact

The Public Utility Vehicle Modernization Program (PUVMP) in the Philippines aims to phase out old jeepneys and replace them with modern, environmentally-friendly vehicles by January 2024, with costs for new jeepneys reaching at least ₱2.6 million. While the government offers subsidies, many drivers and operators express concerns about job losses and increased fares due to the high costs of modernization. The program has faced criticism and protests from transport groups, highlighting the need for public consultations and adjustments to the implementation plan.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views4 pages

Jeepney Modernization Costs and Impact

The Public Utility Vehicle Modernization Program (PUVMP) in the Philippines aims to phase out old jeepneys and replace them with modern, environmentally-friendly vehicles by January 2024, with costs for new jeepneys reaching at least ₱2.6 million. While the government offers subsidies, many drivers and operators express concerns about job losses and increased fares due to the high costs of modernization. The program has faced criticism and protests from transport groups, highlighting the need for public consultations and adjustments to the implementation plan.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

₱2.

6 million
From around ₱1.2 million in 2018, a modern jeepney now costs at least ₱2.6
million, he noted. Jeepney drivers and operators only have a few days left
until the consolidation requirement under the public utility vehicle (PUV)
modernization program ends by January 2024.
This range is higher by as much as 130% than the current minimum fare of ₱13 for
traditional jeepneys.

While the government provides a subsidy of ₱200,000, Valbeuna said this is still not
enough to cover the expenses they will have when they modernize. From around ₱1.2
million in 2018, a modern jeepney now costs at least ₱2.6 million, he noted.

Jeepney drivers and operators only have a few days left until the consolidation
requirement under the public utility vehicle (PUV) modernization program ends by
January 2024.

The Public Utility Vehicle Modernization Program (PUVMP) is a program launched by


the Department of Transportation of the Philippines in 2017, with the goal of making the country's
public transportation system efficient and environmentally friendly by 2020. The program calls for the
phasing-out of jeepneys, buses and other Public Utility Vehicles (PUVs) that are at least 15 years old
and replacing them with safer, more comfortable and more environmentally-friendly alternatives over
the next three years. Currently, there are 220,000 jeepney units operating throughout the country. [2]

Replacement vehicles are required to have at least a Euro 4-compliant engine or an electric engine
to lessen pollution. Some proposed requirements include CCTV cameras, an automated fare
collection system, speed limiters and GPS monitors.[3]

The Land Bank of the Philippines estimates that each jeepney replacement will cost around ₱1.4
million to ₱1.6 million.[4] However, based on an interest rate of 6% per annum and a payment period
of 7 years, the actual cost of a jeepney reaches ₱2.1 million.[5]

While reception among the general populace have been positive,[6] some transport groups have
criticized the program as it might lead to losses of jobs and businesses.[7][8

The program aims to change the current franchising system, revise and introduce new routes and
provide education to jeepney drivers.

The program, according to the DOTr, has the following goals:

 Safe and comfy transport


 Reliable travel time
 Disciplined and competent drivers
 Fair regulations
 Spacious jeepneys
Moreover, the government believes that the program's environmental and economic benefits would
be felt by commuters, operators, and drivers alike: commuters will profit from the changes in routes
and optimized networks. Because of the reduced traffic congestion and pollution, drivers will have
higher monthly pay and benefits, as well as better health. Finally, with less traffic, operators will be
able to take more passengers and save money under the franchising plan by pooling services. [9]

Implementation[edit]
A prototype of a Class II Modernized Jeepney from Isuzu Motors coachbuilt by Almazora
[Link] Isuzu QKR77 Class II Jeepney prototype by CentroA Tata 407 Modernized Jeepney
The Omnibus Franchising Guidelines (OFG) were signed by Transportation Secretary Arthur
Tugade in June 2017, and they altered the process of issuing jeepney franchises by implementing
new route planning criteria and establishing new vehicle and driver standards. [10]

Under the OFG, Local Government Units are required to come up with their own Local Public
Transport Route Plans.[11]

These plans will be based on existing and projected travel patterns and will be considered by
the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board in issuing new franchises. Single-unit
operators will no longer be granted franchises.[12]

Crackdown on dilapidated vehicles[edit]


In January 2018, Metro Manila's Inter-Agency Council on Traffic (i-ACT) launched operation
'Tanggal Bulok, Tanggal Usok', targeting vehicles for environmental and safety violations such as
smoke belching, worn out tires and lack of seat belts. As of January 23, a total of 1087 vehicles,
mostly Public Utility Jeepneys (PUJs), were flagged down, apprehended and issued summons. To
accommodate affected passengers, the Armed Forces of the Philippines have been offering free
rides.[13]

Prototypes[edit]
In October 2017, the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) and the
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) presented sixteen prototype jeepneys. These models were
all locally manufactured and based on guidelines set by the DOTr. Features include:

 Euro 4 engines
 CCTV Cameras
 GPS
 Automated fare collection systems
 Front-facing seats
 New exits on the right-hand side[14]
Financing[edit]
An estimated ₱1.5 billion will be given to transport corporations and cooperatives to purchase new
PUVs through the Development Bank of the Philippines' Program assistance to Support Alternative
Driving Approaches (PASADA). The program will feature a 5-percent equity for vehicle purchase, 6-
percent interest rate and seven-year repayment period.[15][16]

Under PASADA, a maximum of 95 percent of the cost of the vehicle, and a maximum of 75 percent
of the cost of the support facilities comprise the total loan per borrower. The government will also
offer a maximum subsidy of ₱80,000 to cover the equity payment.[17][18]
A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Land Bank of the Philippines was also signed by
the DOTr to set up a ₱1 billion financing for PUJs via the Special Environment-Friendly and
Efficiently Driven (SPEED) Jeepney Program.[19]

Phases[edit]
According to the DOTr, the proposed implementation time frame is as follows: [9]

 Q4 2017 Pilot program in Metro Manila


 2018–2019 Metro Manila, Metro Cebu, Metro Davao
 2019–2020 Highly Urbanized Cities, Rest of the Country
Franchise consolidation[edit]
The December 31, 2023 deadline for the consolidation of PUV drivers and operators was not
extended by President Bongbong Marcos, which led to another transport strike by transport group
Piston on December 14-15, with their continued call to scrap the December 31 deadline and the
complete removal of the mandatory franchise consolidation and the PUV Modernization Program. [20]

Support[edit]
At least twenty government agencies and twenty-four transport groups from across the country
supported the launch of the program.[21] Among transport groups that supported the initiative are the
Panta Transportation Network, Federation of Jeepney Operators and Drivers Association
(FEJODAP), 1-United Transport Koalisyon (1-UTAK), Alliance of Transport Operators and Drivers
Association of the Philippines (ALTODAP), and Coalition of Operators, Drivers, Employees, Atbp.
(CODE-X), and the Philippine Confederation of Drivers and Operators – Alliance of Concerned
Transport Organizations (PCDO-ACTO).[22][23][24] Pangkalahatang Sanggunian Manila & Suburbs
Drivers Association (PASANG-MASDA) also expressed support. Their president Obet Martin stated,
"it was high time for the country to replace the current jeepneys to more modern and more efficient
units".[25]

A 2019 study also showed that majority of commuters prefer to ride an e-jeepney than a
conventional jeepney in areas where it is available, as it provides a safer, environment-friendly, and
more comfortable ride.[6]

Criticism[edit]
Even before its launch, the program was received negatively by various transport groups. While
Senate Bill 1284 and House Bill 4334, the program's enabling legislation, were still pending in
February 2017, some jeepney drivers launched numerous strikes and demonstrations in Metro
Manila and in key cities throughout the country.[26]

According to Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU) and Pinagkaisang Samahan ng Tsuper and Opereytor
Nationwide (PISTON), the ₱1.4 million to ₱1.6 million cost of new jeepneys will adversely affect the
livelihood of 600,000 public utility jeepney (PUJ) drivers and 300,000 small operators. [27] For drivers,
operators, and other transport stakeholders, the modernization may result in possible losses of jobs
and businesses.[28] The group claims that commuters will also be hit with an increased fare of at least
₱20.[27]

Cooperative Development Authority has noted that jeepney driver-operator groups have not been
included in technical working groups for the jeepney modernization program.[29] Vice President Leni
Robredo said jeepney drivers and operators, as well as the riding public, should be allowed to take
part in public consultations regarding the program.[29]
Senator Grace Poe, chair of the Senate public services committee, has expressed doubt over the
governments readiness to implement the program nationwide. According to Poe, the government will
have to shell out ₱415 billion for full implementation of the scheme, far more than the ₱2.26 billion it
approved. She has suggested that the PUV Modernization Program be implemented in select cities
instead.[30]

Senator Poe and Senate Majority Leader Vicente “Tito” Sotto III have called for a "middle ground"
solution, saying that old but road worthy PUVs should be allowed to operate. However, the DOTr
has given no clear commitment to their suggestion.[31] Senator Franklin Drilon criticized the program's
mismanagement and "hodge-podge planning".[32]

In the House of Representatives, Representative Sarah Elago noted how the program displaces
single franchise owners, owing to provisions in the law requiring franchises to own a minimum of 20
units, amounting to P7 million of capital.[33] Another youth group, Student Christian Movement of the
Philippines (SCMP), slammed President Duterte on Independence Day 2021 as a "puppet"
enforcing neoliberal policies such as jeepney phaseout.[34]

In a 2023 petition filed before the Philippine Supreme Court, transport groups argued that the
modernization plan violated the right of jeepney drivers to gainful employment and livelihood and
would result in worsening social inequality in the country.[35]

Protests[edit]
See also: 2017–2019 transport strikes in the Philippines and 2023 transport strikes in the Philippines

The transport group Stop and Go Coalition held a strike on September 24, 2017. [36] On October 16
and 17, PISTON held a two-day transportation strike.[37] In a press statement, Alliance of Concerned
Transport Organizations President Efren de Luna stated that their group did not join the transport
strike as they found that PUV modernization wants to ensure the security of passengers and to have
an environmentally sustainable mode of transportation.[24]

Manibela held a 3-day strike in November 2023 to protest the PUV Modernization Program.
Members of Pasang Masda and FEJODAP joined the strike according to Manibela. [38]

Common questions

Powered by AI

Legislation such as Senate Bill 1284 and House Bill 4334 underpins the PUV Modernization Program, aiming to legalize the modernization efforts . The Omnibus Franchising Guidelines further regulate the issuance of franchises by requiring municipalities to create route plans for franchise approvals . These frameworks impact implementation by establishing standards for vehicle compliance and operational requirements, crucial for aligning local government efforts with national modernization objectives . However, these regulations have also fueled controversies, particularly concerning small operators facing franchise restrictions and high entry costs .

Critics, including several transport groups, argue that the PUV Modernization Program may lead to the loss of jobs and livelihoods for many jeepney drivers and small operators due to the high costs of new vehicles, estimated between ₱1.4 million to ₱1.6 million . Additionally, there's a concern about increased fares hitting commuters . Critics highlight the socio-economic issues of increased financial burdens on current operators and job displacement, fearing it exacerbates social inequality . Another concern is the inadequate involvement of driver-operator groups in the planning process, emphasizing the need for more inclusive policymaking .

The government faces significant challenges in implementing the PUV Modernization Program, notably the financial strain of funding the program fully, which is expected to cost ₱415 billion versus the already approved ₱2.26 billion . Logistically, ensuring the rollout of replacement vehicles with the required technological and environmental standards poses a challenge, alongside coordinating the development of Local Public Transport Route Plans . Additional obstacles include addressing the socio-economic impacts on displaced drivers and operators and balancing implementation with resistance from transport groups .

The PUV Modernization Program ensures safety and efficiency by mandating that replacement vehicles come equipped with Euro 4-compliant engines or electric engines to minimize pollution and improve fuel efficiency . Required safety features include CCTV cameras, automated fare collection systems, speed limiters, and GPS monitors . These technologies aim to enhance passenger safety, operational efficiency, and reduce environmental impact, aligning with the program's goals for safer, more disciplined, and environmentally sustainable public transport .

Protests and strikes by various transport groups, such as PISTON and Manibela, have emerged as responses to deadlines for franchise consolidation and perceived risks of modernization-related job losses . Issues driving these protests include financial burdens imposed by the high cost of new units, potential job losses for 600,000 jeepney drivers and 300,000 operators, and increased fares for commuters . Furthermore, groups have expressed concerns about reduced participation in the program's planning and the socio-economic impact of displacing single-unit operators .

The OFG alters the issuing of jeepney franchises by requiring Local Government Units to develop Local Public Transport Route Plans based on travel patterns for consideration by the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board . These guidelines prevent single-unit operators from being granted franchises, demanding ownership of multiple units, which poses challenges as operators must acquire significant capital to meet this requirement, potentially excluding many small, independent operators from the market .

The PUV Modernization Program offers several financial assistance schemes, including subsidies, loans, and equity payments. The Development Bank of the Philippines' PASADA program features a 5 percent equity for vehicle purchase and covers up to 95 percent of vehicle cost at a 6 percent interest rate over seven years, along with an ₱80,000 government subsidy . Despite these aids, many operators still find the financial burden substantial, as costs for modern jeepneys average ₱2.6 million, overshadowing the effectiveness of these assistance programs .

Supporters of the PUV Modernization Program, including several government agencies and transport associations, argue that the program is crucial for updating aging fleets with modern, safer vehicles . They emphasize the program's role in reducing environmental pollution and improving road safety with features like Euro 4-compliant engines and automated systems . Additionally, supporters argue that the program will lead to more efficient transport networks and better working conditions, offering long-term economic advantages for drivers and operators .

Suggestions for compromising the PUV Modernization Program with socio-economic concerns include allowing roadworthy traditional jeepneys to continue operating . This middle ground solution proposes differential treatment based on vehicle condition rather than age. Additionally, Senator Poe recommended selective city implementation and consultation with stakeholders to ease the transition for operators and drivers . Such solutions seek to alleviate the immediate financial impact on small operators while still progressing towards broader modernization goals .

The PUV Modernization Program sets environmental goals by requiring replacement vehicles to have at least a Euro 4-compliant engine or an electric engine to reduce pollution . Economically, the program aims to benefit commuters, drivers, and operators by optimizing routes, which should lead to reduced traffic congestion and lower pollution levels . For commuters, it promises safer and more environmentally-friendly transport options; for drivers and operators, the program is expected to provide higher pay and benefits due to increased efficiency, improved routes, and reduced congestion, allowing operators to carry more passengers .

You might also like