0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views3 pages

Compound Pendulum Lab Test Guide

The document outlines the procedures and requirements for a laboratory test on the compound pendulum for students at the University of Cape Town. It details the test duration, permissible items, and the method for conducting the experiment, including data collection and analysis. Additionally, it provides a grading rubric for the laboratory report, assessing various components such as the method, data presentation, analysis, and overall impression.

Uploaded by

ayathokoza08
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views3 pages

Compound Pendulum Lab Test Guide

The document outlines the procedures and requirements for a laboratory test on the compound pendulum for students at the University of Cape Town. It details the test duration, permissible items, and the method for conducting the experiment, including data collection and analysis. Additionally, it provides a grading rubric for the laboratory report, assessing various components such as the method, data presentation, analysis, and overall impression.

Uploaded by

ayathokoza08
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

University of Cape Town

Department of Physics
COMPOUND PENDULUM - RULER

Laboratory Test – May 2023


PHY1012S, PHY1014S & PHY1031S

Time: One hour plus one hour Marks: 30

Duration of the lab test:


1. Report to the test venue (PHYLAB2), at least 10 minutes before the start of your test.
2. The total test period is 2 hours. Once the test has started you will have access to the apparatus
and computers for the first 60 minutes. You will move to another venue where you will have the
remaining time to complete the write-up. During the second 60 minutes, you will no longer have
access to the apparatus or the computers.

What you are allowed to take into the lab test venue:
3. Bring only a calculator, pens, pencils, rulers, erasers, etc.
4. This sheet will be available to you.
5. No books, manuals or pieces of paper may be brought into the laboratory test.
6. Do not use correction fluid (“Tippex”).

No communication with others during the lab test:


7. You will perform the laboratory test on your own (i.e., no group work).
8. No communication between students will be allowed during the lab test.
9. Computers will be available in the lab using the program LinearFit.

The compound pendulum

A “compound pendulum” has been constructed from a thin


wooden metre stick which can be caused to swing on a pin
connected to a retort stand which is clamped to the laboratory
bench.

Holes have been pre-drilled into the metre stick.

centre of mass r
The period T of oscillation of the stick for small amplitude L
oscillations about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the stick
is given by

I
T = 2 ... 1
mgr

where I is the moment of inertia of the stick about the pivot point a
distance r from its centre of mass, m is the mass of the stick, and
g is the acceleration due to gravity.
Since I = I CM + mr 2 where ICM is the moment of inertia of the stick about a parallel axis through the
centre of mass,
I CM + mr 2
T = 2 ... 2
mgr

I r2 
which can be transformed to T 2 r = 4 2  CM +  ... 3
 mg g 

1
Since I CM = mL2 for the metre stick
12

 4 2  2 4 2 2
we end up with T 2r =   r + L . ... 4
 g  12 g

Hang the metre stick from the first hole nearest the end of the metre stick. Set the stick swinging back
and forth with small amplitude. Make careful measurements of 20T and r (where r is the distance
from the centre of mass to the axis of rotation). Repeat for the next 4 holes.

Using the sheet of graph paper supplied to you, plot a suitable graph (by hand) to show that equation 4
is a valid description of the oscillations of this compound pendulum. Draw (by hand) your best straight
line through your plotted data.

Use the program LinearFit on one of the lab PCs to complete a least squares analysis of your data in
order to obtain best values for the slope and y-intercept (and their associated uncertainties) for a straight
line fitted to the data.

Determine values for g from each of your values for the slope and y-intercept.

Values for the standard uncertainties for your two values of g can be calculated using

2 2
 u ( g )   u ( y-int)   u ( L) 
2
u ( g ) u (slope)
= and   =  +  .
g slope  g   y -int   L 

Do your two measured values for g agree with each other? Explain carefully.

Write a full report in which you describe your method briefly and succinctly, present your data and
analysis clearly, and make appropriate comments about the quality of your results and how these might
be improved if you had the opportunity to repeat the experiment.

-oOo-

Some hints:
1. Use small swings … not violent rocking. Only use the first 5 holes.
2. Think carefully about what data you need for each hole. How many swings are best?
3. Don’t waste time. “Rough” work takes extra time. Write your data directly into tables in your
answer books.
4. Work carefully and neatly. Plan your time beforehand. Write your very best report.
5. Take the opportunity to go and practice the lab beforehand and discuss with the demonstrators if
you need to.
University of Cape Town Total:
Department of Physics 30
Laboratory report assessment schedule for
compound pendulum practical
Surname: _________________________ Student number: _________________
Date of experiment: ___________________
Report marked by: ________ ___________

Title, Introduction and Aim: (2 marks … 2 = good, 1 = not so good, 0 = poor):


The purpose (aim) of doing the experiment is clearly stated.

Method: (4 marks … 4 = excellent, 3 = good, 2= OK, 1 = not so good, 0 = poor):


There is a diagram of the apparatus with labels.
The method described briefly and clearly.
The method described in sequence of performance.
The method is not difficult to follow due to poor grammar/spelling.

Data and tables: (5 marks … 5 = excellent, 4 = good, 3 = OK, 2 = not so good, 1 = too
many errors, 0 = poor)
The length L is recorded
The table of data has suitable headings.
The columns have correct units.
There are sufficient data points.
There are sufficient repeated observations of T for each r.
The average values of each T are clearly recorded.

Graph: 4 marks … (4 = perfect, 3 = only a few errors, 2 = OK, 1 = not good, 0 = poor)
The points plotted correctly with the correct variables (T2r versus r2).
The graph has labeled axes with correct units.
The graph has a suitable heading.
The graph has an appropriate scale.
A best fit line is drawn to fit to data by hand.

Analysis: 5 marks … 5 = perfect, 4 = good, 3 = only a few errors, 2 = OK, 1 = not good, 0
= poor)
The analysis is correct and clear to follow.
The least squares analysis is completed correctly and the results recorded.
A value for g is correctly calculated from the slope.
A value for g is correctly calculated from the y-intercept and L.
The standard uncertainties for both values of g are appropriately calculated.
The results obtained are clearly stated with appropriate units.

Conclusion and discussion: 5 marks … 5 = excellent, 4 = good, 3 = OK, 2 = not so good,


1 = weak, 0 = terrible)
The results are appropriately compared and agree with each other to within one standard
uncertainty.
The magnitudes of the results are reasonable.
The conclusions are related to the aims of the experiment.
There is a suitable discussion around possible ways of improving the experiment.

Overall impression of the report: (5 marks … 5 = excellent, 4 = good, 3 = OK, 2 = not great,
1 = not good, 0 = poor)

Common questions

Powered by AI

Maintaining small amplitude swings is essential during a pendulum experiment to ensure that the assumption of simple harmonic motion (SHM) holds true, which simplifies mathematical modeling . Larger amplitudes introduce nonlinear effects that can lead to deviations from SHM, affecting the accuracy of period calculations and distorting results, thus leading to potential inaccuracies in derived parameters like the gravitational constant .

The method of least squares analysis helps in deriving the gravitational acceleration constant by fitting a straight line to the graph of T²r versus r², enabling accurate determination of the slope and y-intercept . Key considerations include ensuring accurate and precise data collection to minimize errors, as well as correctly calculating standard uncertainties associated with the slope and intercept to assess the reliability of the derived gravitational constant values .

Improvements could include enhancing precision in measuring the distance r by using digital calipers, ensuring the pin pivot is free of frictional forces, and conducting the experiment in a controlled environment to minimize external influences like air currents . Utilizing software for automated data collection may reduce human errors, and increasing the number of measurement points across additional holes can improve statistical reliability of the findings .

If two calculated values for gravitational acceleration do not agree within one standard uncertainty, it implies potential errors in measurement or data analysis . This discrepancy may be due to systematic errors, improper handling of equipment, or incorrect data input during the least squares analysis. These findings necessitate a review of the experimental setup and methodologies, including checking measurement precision and recalibration of apparatus, to improve accuracy in future experiments .

Repeated measurements enhance the reliability of experimental findings by reducing random errors and increasing the accuracy of average values calculated, thus providing more consistent and dependable results . This process mitigates potential anomalies from single measurements, ensuring a robust dataset for subsequent analysis like least squares fitting .

To ensure accuracy when measuring the period of oscillation for a compound pendulum, it is crucial to set the stick swinging with small amplitude rather than violent rocking, as larger amplitudes can introduce measurement errors . Data collection should include careful measurements of 20T and r for multiple holes in the meter stick, with repeated observations to ensure reliability. The data should be directly recorded into tables in the answer books for clarity and efficiency .

Graphical representation of the relationship between T², r, and r² might face challenges such as plotting errors due to incorrect scale selection or mislabeling of axes . Addressing these requires ensuring that the axes are labeled correctly with appropriate units and that a suitable scale is chosen to accurately plot data points. Drawing the best fit line through these points should be done carefully to minimize errors, ensuring they're within acceptable limits .

Effective time management in a compound pendulum laboratory test involves planning the sequence of measurements to maximize the use of available equipment, directly recording data into tables to avoid rework, and allocating adequate time for analysis and reporting . Ensuring pre-lab practice and discussions with demonstrators can further enhance familiarity with procedures, minimizing errors during the test .

The assessment criteria cover multiple aspects including a clear statement of purpose, method description, data presentation, and analysis quality . This comprehensive approach promotes scientific rigor by encouraging thoroughness in experimental design, precision in data collection, and accuracy in analysis. However, effectiveness also depends on the clarity of criteria and whether they encourage critical thinking and innovation beyond merely following procedures .

The moment of inertia about the pivot point affects the computation of the period of oscillation because the period T depends directly on the moment of inertia I as indicated in the formula T = 2π√(I/mgr). An increase in the moment of inertia leads to an increase in the period of oscillation, assuming other parameters are constant, as it requires more time to complete one cycle of oscillation.

You might also like