PURPOSIVE COMMUNICATION

SCRIPT

Slide 1:
Dinopol:
Communication—it's how we connect, share ideas, and understand one another. But what
happens when that connection gets lost? Miscommunication can lead to confusion,
misunderstandings, and even conflict. Today, we’ll dive into the crucial elements of the
communication process and how easily things can go awry.

I’m Christopher James Dinopol from Group 5, and joining me are my fellow group
members: Red Baguio, Jeralyn Comamao, AJ Cutang, Snowie Dato-on, Raia Garcia, and
Khadaffy Lakbao. Together, we’ll be sharing our analysis and insights based on the YouTube
video entitled "Miscommunication." By the end of this discussion, you’ll have a clearer
understanding of how these elements work—and how they can sometimes fail us.

Slide 2:​
Baguio:
​ Hello, everyone! My name is Red Baguio. Now, let me quickly walk you through our
presentation. We’ll begin with a brief introduction, as we are done and then focus on Barnlund's
Transactional Model as the core of our discussion. We’ll explore the key elements of
communication in the video, analyze the causes of the miscommunication, and share each
member’s reflections. Finally, we’ll wrap up with references of our information — the diagram
of the communication process.

Slide 3:
Cutang:
​ Hello, everyone! My name is AJ Cutang. As for the group, we have chosen Barnlund's
Transactional Model of Communication. By its definition, as you can see on the screen,
“Barnlund’s Transactional Model of Communication emphasizes the role of cues (public, private,
and behavioral) in communication. It highlights the simultaneous sending and receiving of
messages and the influence of individual experiences and backgrounds on communication. It
acknowledges that communication is a dynamic, two-way process.”

​ Meaning, it emphasizes that communication is not just a linear exchange but a

continuous, dynamic process. Both parties send and receive messages simultaneously, influenced
by their personal experiences and backgrounds. The model also highlights the importance of
cues—public, private, and behavioral—that shape how we interpret these messages. However,
it's important to note that during this process, 'noise' can interfere. Noise refers to any kind of
disturbance—whether physical, psychological, or emotional—that can distort or disrupt the
clarity of the message being communicated. This could be external noise, like a loud
environment, or internal noise, like stress or preconceived notions, which can hinder effective
communication. Barnlund’s model helps us understand that communication is always evolving,
affected by both the messages exchanged and the potential barriers that arise in the process.

​ In the following slide, Snowie Dato-on will explain about the elements of this kind of
communication model, as you can see in the model itself.

Slide 4:
Dato-on:
Hello, everyone! My name is Snowie Dato-on. In Barnlund's Transactional Model, there
are five key elements of communication. First, we have the communicators, which are the
individuals involved in the exchange. Both parties act as senders and receivers simultaneously.
Next is encoding, which refers to the process of turning thoughts or ideas into messages that can
be communicated. This message is then transmitted through a channel, which can be verbal,
non-verbal, or even through digital means. Once the message is received, the receiver decodes
it—interpreting or making sense of the message based on their own experiences and
understanding. Finally, there's the message itself, which is the content being communicated. Each
of these elements plays a vital role in ensuring clear and effective communication.

Slide 5:
Lakbao:
​ Hello, everyone! My name is Khadaffy Lakbao! As means of relating the communication
model to the Youtube video entitled “Miscommunication”

The communicators in the video are speakers engaging in face-to-face interaction,

delivering their message with a blend of humor and laughter to create an engaging and relaxed
atmosphere. Through verbal expressions, body language, and facial cues, they effectively capture
the audience's attention, making the message more relatable and memorable. Their use of
physical presence allows them to adjust their tone and gestures based on real-time audience
reactions, enhancing both the clarity and entertainment value of their communication.

​ Moving forward, First, Message Examination: The message did reach the intended
receiver, as they heard the words. However, the meaning behind the message, the sender's intent,
was lost in translation.

Second, Receiver Response: The receiver did respond, but with anger and accusations,
which clearly demonstrates the miscommunication.
 Third, Impediments to Successful Communication: The primary barrier here was the
receiver’s inaccurate decoding of the message. This misinterpretation could stem from several
factors, such as personal biases, emotional state, or lack of context.

Slide 6:
Dinopol:
​ To continue, there were a lot of factors that contributed to the miscommunication in the
video.
Firstly, Lack of Trust: One key barrier to effective communication is a lack of trust. In
the video we analyzed, we noticed that the speakers didn’t seem to take each other seriously.
There were a lot of playful pranks and laughable moments, with laughter in the background. This
casual tone can sometimes signal to the receiver that the sender isn’t being sincere or that the
message isn't important. Additionally, the speakers were more focused on their own thoughts
than on understanding each other, which made it harder for them to connect on a deeper level.

Comamao:
Hello, everyone! My name is Jeralyn Comamao. To continue: Secondly, Emotional
State: Another important factor is the emotional state of the receiver. If someone is having a bad
day or is already predisposed to anger, they might interpret the message differently than
intended. In the video, we observed that one or two of the speakers were likely emotionally
charged, which could have triggered a more defensive or negative response. When emotions are
high, it’s easy for messages to be misinterpreted or miscommunicated.

Thirdly, Nonverbal Communication: Communication is not just about the words we

use; nonverbal cues play a huge role too. Even if the sender is saying the right words, their tone
of voice, facial expressions, or body language might send a completely different message. If the
sender’s nonverbal cues don’t align with the message, the receiver may perceive the
communication as insincere or confusing.

Garcia:
Hello, everyone! My name is Raia Garcia! Moving forward: Lastly, Assumptions:
Sometimes, the receiver might jump to conclusions based on assumptions. In the case of the
video, the receiver might have assumed that the sender was being careless or even malicious,
which clouded their understanding of the message. These assumptions can create barriers and
distort the true meaning of what was being communicated.

**In short,** while the words were transmitted, the underlying meaning failed to be
successfully conveyed or received. The receiver’s emotional state, assumptions, and
misinterpretation of nonverbal cues all contributed to a significant disconnect, resulting in
miscommunication.

Slide 7 - 13:
SPEAK YOUR OWN REFLECTION!

Slide 14 - 15:
Dinopol:
​ Before we formally end, this is one of the references that we gathered with regards to the
communication model of Barnlund. And, in general summary, effective communication relies
not only on the words used but also on trust, emotional awareness, and nonverbal cues.
Miscommunication arises when these elements are misunderstood or overlooked, leading to
confusion and conflict. That is all and thank you.