Legacy of I-Hotel Protests Explained
Uploaded by
larkhoon.leemLegacy of I-Hotel Protests Explained
Uploaded by
larkhoon.leemTranscript #1 (Interview with Patacsil_short1)
Ethan Leem: Along that idea, would you kind of say there's definite evidence
that stuff dating all the way back to the 70s from the I-Hotel have making
impacts still today, kind of the legacy is still here among us today?
Prof. Patacsil: Yes, I think most of this is definitely because I think it's also in
terms of like what I just give you a legitimate example so this unit is covered
in my class and so when the students learn about it, I think they feel as a
pride that there's just like a scene that people fought for these little cost of
housing for these modics and and and as a pride that the Filipino, Chinese,
and community and not only because there was there was coalitions, there's
the Chinese, there were the there were the because this was right by
Chinatown, there were coalitions of people who came together even on the
black tower movement that I think there was a number of connections that
helped the protest at the I-Hotel over the years. So I think that the legacy
that one students and even your stuff is, for example, Filipino, American
students or Filipino students taking a Filipino American experience class,
when they learn about this, they feel as a sense of pride for the fight of that
legacy and also level of understanding of why it's important to put people
before profit.
Summary: The legacy of the I-Hotel protests from the 1970s continues to
have an impact today, particularly in education and activism. Students
studying the Filipino American experience learn about the struggle for
affordable housing and take pride in the coalition of diverse communities—
Filipino, Chinese, and Black activists—who united for the cause. This history
reinforces the importance of prioritizing people over profit and inspires a
deeper understanding of social justice movements.
Transcript #2 (Interview with Patacsil_short2)
Ethan Leem: Do you think that the Filipinos could have kind of seen out the
other side and maybe thought, oh maybe these even though they did
unjustly evict us, they did kind of have these genuine motivations to pursue
things like these and do you think that kind of or in general do you think like
both sides of the history had moments where they saw each other out and
said admit it that yeah I guess you guys do have these like valid motivations
or something that do you think that would have might have happened?
Prof. Patacsil: Um yes and no I think so like initially the sheriff that involved in
the eviction was was supporting the cause and eventually so yes that's why
but the others you know with that could hold but because he had to enforce
the law but in terms of the Filipino fully understanding it I'm not sure if they if
they fully did yeah because I said yes and no because I think in terms of that
law say they get for ten years then they happen to it there's nothing there
was there is this this effort to evict us people so that they could build and
then when they were going to build a parking lot you know how does that
help but in terms of however many years later the fact that I hotel did get
rebuilt and then there is that housing developed and it's a home for seniors
it's low cost.
Summary: The perspectives on the I-Hotel eviction were complex. While
some, like the sheriff involved, initially supported the tenants' cause, they
were ultimately bound by the law. There may have been moments of mutual
understanding between both sides, but it’s unclear if the evicted Filipino
community fully recognized the motivations behind the eviction. The long-
term outcome, however, saw the eventual reconstruction of the I-Hotel as
low-cost senior housing, highlighting a partial resolution to the struggle.