0% found this document useful (0 votes)
109 views2 pages

Modern Approach in Political Science

The document discusses the emergence of Modern Political Analysis through the Behavioural Revolution, which arose from dissatisfaction with traditional political science methods. Behaviouralism focuses on the scientific study of individual political behavior rather than institutions, emphasizing objective, quantifiable research methods. Key characteristics include a protest against conventional approaches, a focus on individual behavior, a scientific outlook, and the aim to develop universally applicable theories.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
109 views2 pages

Modern Approach in Political Science

The document discusses the emergence of Modern Political Analysis through the Behavioural Revolution, which arose from dissatisfaction with traditional political science methods. Behaviouralism focuses on the scientific study of individual political behavior rather than institutions, emphasizing objective, quantifiable research methods. Key characteristics include a protest against conventional approaches, a focus on individual behavior, a scientific outlook, and the aim to develop universally applicable theories.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Modern Approach: The process of development of a new science of politics, which popularly came to be known as Modern Political Analysis,

began with the coming of


Behavioural Revolution.
The deep dissatisfaction with the nature, scope, method and conclusion of traditional political science led to the emergence of a revolution i.e., Behavioural Revolution.
This revolution led to the emergence of Behavoural approach in politics. Under the weight of its own weakness as well as due to several new developments it got replaced
by a revolution from within the post – Behaviouralism.

Behaviouralism: In simple word, the methods and principles of the scientific study of animal (human) behavior.
Behaviouralism asserts that for an acceptable scientific theory of social science it is essential that the political behavior of individual is to be studied and not the units and
organizations which deal with political questions and principles. It is because the political behavior of actors constitutes the central aspects of politics.
Behaviouralism is an approach in political science which emerged in the 1930’s in the United States. Its represents a sharp break from previous political science. This is
because it emphasized on objective, quantified approach to explain and predict the political behavior.
Behaviouralism seeks to examine the behavior, actions and acts of individuals rather than the characteristics of institutions such as Legislative, Executive and Judiciary
and groups of different social setting and explain this behavior as it relates to the political system.
Prior to the Behaviouralist revolution, political science being a science at all was disputed. Critics saw the study of politics as being primarily quanlitative and normative
and claimed that it lacked a scientific method necessary to be deemed a science.
The Behaviouralist approach was innovative because it changed the attitude of the purpose of enquiry. it was moved towards research that was supported by verifiable
facts. To understand political behavior, behaviouralism uses the following methods: Sampling, Interview, Scoring, and Scaling and Statistical analysis.
Behaviouralism studies how individuals behave in group positions realistically rather than how they should behave. Behaviouralism means to study the behavior of
particular persons or any organisation and then predict the political future based on the understanding.

Characteristics:
1. Movement of Protest: Behaviouralism as has already has explained is a sort of protest movement against the inadequacies of conventional political science mainly led by
the American political scientists.
They are highly dissatisfied with the achievements of conventional political science because of its inadequacies. The conventional political science confined its
study only to the state and government and did not take into account the political phenomena and behavior of men.
2. Focus on Behaviour: Behaviouralism is a sort of protest movement against traditional approaches in political science; therefore Behaviouralism has made the individual
as centre of attention in the study of political phenomena. The Behaviouralists thoughts that through the behavior differs from individual, yet it shows certain qualities of
uniformity.
3. Scientific outlook and Objectivity: Behaviouralism stressed the special importance of the scientific outlook and objectivity. The Behaviouralists overlook the ethical
values because they cannot be studied scientifically and objectively. Instead they advocate value free science of politics.
4. Methodological Revolution: Behaviouralism brought about altogether a new approach in the study of political research. Consequently, some scholars regards
Behaviouralism as not but a methodological revolution in political science.
whereas the traditional political scientist employed – philosophical, historical or comparative methods for their study.
The behaviouralists emphasis such technique are; observation, interview, Survey, research, case studies and data collection etc.
5. Invention of Scientific Theory: The main aim of the Behaviouralists is to build a scientific theory with the help of observation and experimentation, which may be able
to predict things and be applied universally. The traditional political theory could never be empirically tested and validated.

In order to understand the characteristics and tenets of behaviouralism we have to study the views of eminent scholars like David Truman, Heinz Eulau, Morris Janowiz
and David Easton.

David Trumans’s defines political behaviouralism as the science of political behavior, where political behavior means all “those actions and interactions of
men and groups which are involved in the process of governing.

David Easton has identified the following eight major assumptions or characteristics of Behaviouralism and called them the “intellectual foundation
stone.” They are;

Regularities
Verification
Techniques
Quantifications
Value
Systematization
Pure Science
Integration
These eight assumptions definitely form the common core of the views of almost all the behaviouralists. However, at the same time, these reflect the
inherent weakness of Behaviouralism.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The primary aim of behaviouralism was to develop a scientific theory of politics that could predict political behavior universally . It sought to achieve this by employing methods such as observation, interviews, surveys, and statistical analysis to study the behavior and actions of individuals . This empirical and objective approach aimed to produce verifiable and value-free political research .

The behavioural approach in political science emerged due to profound dissatisfaction with traditional political science, which was criticized for its qualitative and normative nature and lack of scientific methods . Behaviouralism differentiated itself by focusing on the objective, quantified study of individual political behavior rather than the characteristics of institutions . It emphasized verifiable facts and scientific methods such as sampling, statistical analysis, and case studies .

Behaviouralism shifted the focus of political science from the study of institutions and normative theories to the analysis of individual behavior within political contexts . This shift had significant implications, emphasizing empirical research over philosophical discussions and promoting a scientific approach to understanding governance and political interactions . The implications included a greater emphasis on data collection and analysis, challenging traditional qualitative studies and driving towards generalizable findings .

The behavioural revolution led to dissatisfaction with traditional political science due to its perceived inadequacies, such as a narrow focus on state and government and lack of scientific rigor . Behaviouralists protested against these limitations by advocating for a shift to studying political behavior of individuals, which they argued was central to understanding political phenomena . This movement was fundamentally driven by a desire to replace normative and qualitative approaches with objective, empirical research .

Behaviouralism claimed to provide a more scientific perspective by employing empirical, objective, and quantifiable research methods as opposed to the philosophical, historical, or comparative approaches of traditional political science . It focused on observable political behavior of individuals and utilized techniques such as sampling and statistical analysis to create verifiable, predictive theories, thus positioning itself as a value-free science .

David Easton identified eight major assumptions of behaviouralism: Regularities, Verification, Techniques, Quantification, Values, Systematization, Pure Science, and Integration . These assumptions are significant because they form the intellectual foundation of behaviouralism, advocating a rigorous scientific approach to studying political phenomena. They emphasize the need for systematic observation, empirical data collection, and the development of universal, predictive theories .

Dissatisfaction with the traditional study of politics, which was seen as lacking scientific methods and focused solely on state and government, played a critical role in the emergence of behaviouralism . Behaviouralism redefined the purpose of political enquiry by emphasizing the study of political behavior through scientific methods and objective analysis, rather than normative philosophies, leading to more data-driven, empirical research .

The methodological approach of behaviouralism differs from traditional techniques by utilizing empirical and scientific methods such as observation, sampling, interviews, and statistical analysis . Prior to its advent, political scientists relied mainly on philosophical, historical, and comparative methods, focusing on qualitative assessments. Behaviouralism, in contrast, advocates for objective, data-driven research aimed at understanding and predicting political behavior .

Despite its scientific approach, behaviouralism is criticized for its disregard for ethical values, which it does not deem scientifically or objectively studies . This exclusion can result in a narrow focus that overlooks the normative dimensions of political life. Additionally, while it aims for universal applicability of theories, the emphasis on regularities and quantification may not fully capture the complexity and variability of political behavior .

Behaviouralism transformed political science research by introducing scientific methods such as observation, interviews, surveys, and case studies . It emphasized quantification and empirical validation, which was a departure from philosophical, historical, or comparative methods used previously . This change is considered a methodological revolution because it established a value-free and objective science of politics, focusing on individual behaviors and aiming to construct predictive scientific theories .

You might also like