0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views3 pages

Financial Management Week 6 Tutorial Questions

The document contains tutorial questions for a financial management course, focusing on dividend policies and financial calculations for two companies, Pavlon Inc and DD Co. It discusses Pavlon's historical earnings, dividend policies, and the implications of its recent stock exchange listing, as well as DD Co's dividend payout ratio and capital structure. The questions require analysis of dividend appropriateness and the impact of dividend policy changes on share prices.

Uploaded by

CHAN WEI YENG
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views3 pages

Financial Management Week 6 Tutorial Questions

The document contains tutorial questions for a financial management course, focusing on dividend policies and financial calculations for two companies, Pavlon Inc and DD Co. It discusses Pavlon's historical earnings, dividend policies, and the implications of its recent stock exchange listing, as well as DD Co's dividend payout ratio and capital structure. The questions require analysis of dividend appropriateness and the impact of dividend policy changes on share prices.

Uploaded by

CHAN WEI YENG
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

BBMF2814 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2 RAC

Week 6 Tutorial Questions


_____________________________________________________________________________________

Question 1 (PAVLON)

Pavlon Inc has recently obtained a listing on the Stock Exchange. 90% of the company’s shares were
previously owned by members of one family but, since the listing, approximately 60% of the issued
shares have been owned by other investors.

Pavlon’s earnings and dividends for the five years prior to the listing are detailed below:

Years prior to listing Profit after tax Dividend per share (cents)
5 1,800,000 3.6
4 2,400,000 4.8
3 3,850,000 6.16
2 4,100,000 6.56
1 4,450,000 7.12
Current year 5,500,000 (estimate)

The number of issued ordinary shares was increased by 25% three years prior to the listing and by 50% at
the time of the listing. The company’s authorised capital is currently $25,000,000 in 25¢ ordinary shares,
of which 40,000,000 shares have been issued. The market value of the company’s equity is $78,000,000.

The board of directors is discussing future dividend policy. An interim dividend of 3.16 cents per share
was paid immediately prior to the listing and the finance director has suggested a final dividend of 2.34
cents per share.

The company’s declared objective is to maximise shareholder wealth.

Required:

(a) Comment upon the nature of the company’s dividend policy prior to the listing and discuss whether
such a policy is likely to be suitable for a company listed on the Stock Exchange. (5
marks)

(b) Discuss whether the proposed final dividend of 2.34 cents is likely to be an appropriate dividend:

(i) If the majority of shares are owned by wealthy private individuals; and
(ii) If the majority of shares are owned by institutional investors. (10 marks)

1
BBMF2814 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2 RAC
Week 6 Tutorial Questions
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Question 2 (DD)

DD Co has a dividend payout ratio of 40% and has maintained this payout ratio for several years. The
current dividend per share of the company is 50c per share and it expects that its next dividend per share,
payable in one year’s time, will be 52c per share.

The capital structure of the company is as follows:


$m $m

Bond A will be redeemed at par in ten years’ time and pays annual interest of 9%. The cost of debt of this
bond is 9.83% per year. The current ex interest market price of the bond is $95.08.

Bond B will be redeemed at par in four years’ time and pays annual interest of 8%. The cost of debt of
this bond is 7.82% per year. The current ex interest market price of the bond is $102.01. DD Co has a cost
of equity of 12.4%. Ignore taxation.

Required:

(a) Calculate the following values for DD Co:

(i) ex-dividend share price, using the dividend growth model; (3 marks)
(ii) capital gearing (debt divided by debt plus equity) using market values; and (2 marks)

(b) Discuss whether a change in dividend policy will affect the share price of DD Co. (8 marks)

2
BBMF2814 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2 RAC
Week 6 Tutorial Questions
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Question 3 (ECHO)

Common questions

Powered by AI

The dividend growth model helps determine the ex-dividend share price by considering the present value of expected future dividends growing at a constant rate. For DD Co., the model would calculate the ex-dividend price using the expected dividend of 52c per share, growing from the current 50c per share, with a constant growth based on the payout ratio. The cost of equity at 12.4% would be used to discount these dividends, enabling a precise calculation of the company's share value from a dividend perspective .

Listing on the Stock Exchange compels Pavlon Inc. to enhance transparency, improve accountability, and adopt robust governance practices to comply with regulatory standards and meet investor expectations. This transformation involves structuring an independent board, establishing clear policies for disclosures, financial reporting, and shareholder communications. These changes are essential to garnering investor trust and maintaining a positive market reputation, distinct from pre-listing governance intrinsic to a family-owned model .

Institutional investors often look for stable and potentially increasing dividends as a signal of a company's solid performance and commitment to shareholder returns. A 2.34 cents per share final dividend might be considered low, especially if the interim dividend was 3.16 cents, suggesting a decrease which may not align with institutional investors' expectations for income and continuous value growth. As such, this could impact shareholders' perception negatively unless the company convincingly communicates a reinvestment plan to drive future growth .

A change in DD Co.'s dividend policy could impact investor perception and consequently its share price. Given DD Co.'s cost of equity at 12.4% and a dividend payout of 40%, maintained over several years, any reduction in dividends might suggest to investors a lack of profitable reinvestment opportunities or signal distress, leading to a potential drop in share price. Conversely, an increase in dividends could indicate strong future performance, possibly boosting investor confidence and share price. However, the signal effect of a policy change can significantly depend on how and when the information is disseminated to the market .

The capital gearing ratio, calculated as debt divided by debt plus equity using market values, measures DD Co.'s financial leverage. A high gearing ratio might suggest higher financial risk due to dependence on debt, which could affect the company's capacity to meet its obligations during economic downturns. Conversely, a low gearing ratio indicates less reliance on debt and potentially lower risk. Investors analyze this to understand the risk profile and sustainability of a company's capital structure .

Increasing authorised capital and issuing more ordinary shares before listing reflects a strategic move by Pavlon Inc. to attract capital and enhance market visibility. This action can dilute existing shareholding to some extent but provides the company with funds necessary for expansion, reducing dependency on debt and increasing liquidity. Furthermore, the increased shareholding diversity at the time of listing can help stabilize share price volatility and enhance investor confidence by demonstrating growth prospects and financial expansion preparedness .

With Pavlon Inc., a potential conflict of interest may arise between minority shareholders and the previous family majority, now reduced to a minority holding post-listing. Prior family control might have focused on long-term growth and strategic direction with adjusted dividends, but new external investors could prioritize immediate returns and stable cash flow through dividends. Therefore, instituting a new dividend policy must balance these interests, possibly by retaining sufficient profit for growth and introducing predictable dividend payments that satisfy both growth-oriented and income-seeking shareholders .

Maintaining a payout ratio of 40% for DD Co. establishes investor confidence in receiving consistent returns, potentially appealing to income-focused investors. This consistency also reflects financial stability, although it might restrain the company's capacity for reinvestment and strategic growth if profits are primarily distributed as dividends. Balancing this payout with opportunities for reinvestment is crucial for sustaining long-term financial health and aligning with strategic growth plans .

Pavlon Inc. should consider the transition from a predominantly family-owned business to a publicly listed entity with diverse investors. Prior to the listing, the dividends were progressively increasing as the company was possibly reinvesting profits for growth, indicated by the substantial increase in profit and dividends in the years preceding the listing. Now, with the listing, the company might need to balance between paying dividends and reinvesting for future growth to satisfy both income-focused investors and growth-oriented shareholders. The decision should align with maximizing shareholder wealth, which is the company's declared aim .

The dividend growth model assumes a constant growth rate and stable market conditions, implying that companies can indefinitely sustain dividend growth consistent with historical rates. For DD Co., these assumptions might affect its real-world application if growth rates are expected to fluctuate due to market dynamics or operational changes. Therefore, while useful, reliance solely on this model could mislead investors if the assumptions deviate from the company's actual future performance, requiring additional metrics to validate share valuation .

You might also like