0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views3 pages

Exploring Personal Philosophy and Morality

The document outlines a personal philosophy that emphasizes the importance of hard work, positivity, and kindness, while also exploring beliefs in God, the meaning of life, morality, and free will. It argues that science has limitations in addressing philosophical questions and critiques the notion that morality is merely obedience to authority. Additionally, it highlights the value of philosophy in fostering critical thinking and intellectual growth through uncertainty.

Uploaded by

2500583
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views3 pages

Exploring Personal Philosophy and Morality

The document outlines a personal philosophy that emphasizes the importance of hard work, positivity, and kindness, while also exploring beliefs in God, the meaning of life, morality, and free will. It argues that science has limitations in addressing philosophical questions and critiques the notion that morality is merely obedience to authority. Additionally, it highlights the value of philosophy in fostering critical thinking and intellectual growth through uncertainty.

Uploaded by

2500583
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Discussion: What is Philosophy?

My philosophy or worldview is that everything happens for a reason, and we can learn from our

experiences. I believe that working hard and always staying positive is key to achieving our

goals and showing kindness to others is also very important. Additionally, I think every human

has a person in life, and our actions are free but come with consequences.

Belief in God (Confidence is 4/5)

I believe in God for some personal experiences and for the power of morals I derived from

religion. Although I really do not follow one religion strictly, I am sure there is something in the

universe that is in control. This gives me a direction, lets me give an association with people

while contributing my actions through empathy and kindness for people. I know that there’s

going to be a difference of views about the existence of a divine will, but I’ve seen enough to

feel that it must be a higher power that’s beyond human understanding.

Meaning in Life

Relationships, personal growth and having a positive effect on other people are what gives me

meaning of life. I believe that life does not come with a fixed purpose, we make our own

meaning by what we choose. But my confidence level in this belief is roughly 3 out of 5 because

I believe we make meaning mostly but sometimes I doubt that when I am confronted with

existential challenges.

Morality

I would consider myself a 5 in morality because my morals are guided by the principles of

fairness and good treatment toward others. I personally do not believe that morality is given by

God or society, but rather it comes from within a human being guided by his sense of fairness
and empathy. Man should be good not because he is afraid or pressured but because it begets a

peaceful and happy life.

Free Will

Personally, I put my free will at a confidence level of 4. I believe in free will, but I mean we

don’t have control over some things. Not everything can be changed, I do not think so. But we

can decide what turns of our future. The belief makes me feel responsible and in control of

myself.

Answer the Questions Based on Chapter 1

a. Why should we doubt that science covers all of human inquiry? Does this surprise

you?

We should doubt that science covers all human inquiry because it deals with things that can be

tested and measured. But these are the more philosophical questions: it does not provide answers

to questions about values, principles, or the nature of human knowing. I don't think that's

surprising at all that science has certain limits, and because of that, it needs other kinds of

disciplines like philosophy to reach those places, like the ethics, and what the meaning of life.

b. What problem does the view that morality is simply a matter of the say-so of some

authority lead to?

The problem with thinking that morality is just about obeying what some authority tells you to is

that it makes morality just obedient, not thoughtful decision making. If people only look to

authority for what 'is right or wrong', they stop thinking critically about what is right or wrong.
Doing this can easily turn into blindly following rules even if it means that the rules being

followed are harmful or wrong; especially if the rules making up the authority make mistakes.

c. What’s the difference between saying we can’t know the answer to some question and

saying that there is no truth of the matter?

The difference is that when we say we don’t know the answer, we mean the truth does not exist,

we just don’t have the knowledge or ability to find it. Whereas in the other case we are saying

there is no truth of the matter; maybe the question does not have a clear and objective answer,

because it depends on personal views or it is just beyond investigation.

d. Comment on a quote from pg. 9 (Russell's “The Value of Philosophy”)

According to Bertrand Russell, the actual role and value of philosophy are that philosophy is

uncertain, he considers the good things about philosophy to come from the way it makes people

question their presuppositions rather than accept phenomena as they are. Such uncertainty does

not lead to weakness but instead develops our critical sense, keeping our minds open to new

ideas. Since philosophy cannot give certain answers, it opens possibilities leading to an increase

in understanding and fostering intellectual growth.

You might also like