Railway Servants Discipline Rules 1968
Railway Servants Discipline Rules 1968
[Link]
APO/G/TPJ
• DAR
[Link]. 66(Penalities) ,
DAR is the tool to improve the performance of the employee and not to punish.
•
Constitutional Provisions
• Article 309 recruitment and conditions of service of persons serving the union or state
subject to the provisions of the constitution President to make rules to regulate the working
conditions.
• Article 310 accepts the principle that Central Government employees hold their positions
during the 'pleasure' of the President, who is in control of their discipline.
•
Constitutional Provisions
• Article 3II (1) No civil servant shall be removed or dismissed from service by an authority
subordinate to the authority who appointed him.
• Article 311(2) No civil servant shall be removed or dismissed from service or reduced in rank
without an inquiry in which he is informed of the charges against him and is given a
reasonable opportunity to be heard about those charges.
•
Principles of Natural Justice:
• Principles of Natural Justice are the principle which lay down and elaborate the reasonable
opportunity which should be given to the charged employee.
•
Principles of Natural Justice
advance.
Introduction to DAR
The Railway Servants (Discilpline & Appeal) Rules, 1968
contains
7 – PARTS
31 – RULES
3 - SCHEDULES
• Rules Break up
•
DAR Rule No. and Subjects
2. Definition
3. Application
5. Suspension
6. Penalties.
•
DAR Rule No. and Subjects
7. Disciplinary Authorities.
•
Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968
Government etc.
•
Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968
submission of Appeal.
Appeal
•
Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968
• DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY.
• APPELLATE AUTHORITY.
• REVISIONARY AUTHORITY.
• REVIEWING AUTHORITY.
• APPOINTING AUTHORITY.
• (2) (a) Appointing Authority: The authority empowered to make appointments to the service
of which the Railway servant is, for the time being, a member or to the grade of the service.
• No Authority other than AA, order the Removal / Dismissal / CR from service
• (2) ( C) Disciplinary Authority: (Gaz). In relation to Rule 9 and clauses (a) and (b) of sup-rule
(1) of Rule 11 in the case of any Gaz. Railway servant, an authority competent to impose any
of the penalties specified in Rule 6.
• Disciplinary Authority: ( Non- Gaz) In relation to Rule No.9 in the case of any non-gaz. Railway
servant, an authority competent to impose any of the major penalties specified in Rule No.9.
• In relation to Clauses (a) and (b) sub-rule (1) of Rule 11, in the case of Non-gaz., an authority
competent to impose any of the penalties specified in Rule No.6
• INQUIRY AUTHORITY
• The official nominated by the D.A to conduct disciplinary enquiry is the Inquiry authority. It
could be the Disciplinary Authority itself or a single officer/supervisor or a committee of two
or more officers. Not lower than the C.O
• Where there is a case of sexual harassment, the Complaints Committee established for
enquiring into it shall be deemed to be the inquiring authority.
• Defence Counsel
• Defence Counsel could be another employee or a retired Railway employee or a Trade union
official of a recognized union who is assisted to charged employee in inquiry proceedings.
• Head of the Department means clause 21 of Rule 103 IREC ”any authority which the President
may by order declare to be the head of a department for the purpose of these Rules”.
• DEFENCE HELPER.
•
Appointment of Presenting Officer
• The disciplinary Authority may when consider necessary nominate any Railway Servant as
presenting officer, to present the case in support of charges before the Inquiry Authority. The
presenting officer is mainly appointed in complicated cases where the employees of different
departments are involved (common proceeding) or in serious vigilance cases. Nomination of
Presenting Officer is done on SF8.
• Appeallate Authority
• The Authority immediate Higher authority to Disciplinary Authority. In case the penalty raised
during the Appeal then the next higher authority is called Appellate Authority (Rule 19)
• Revisionary Authority means the authority higher than the Appellate Authority but not below
the [Link]. (Rule 25)
• Def.
• Commission means the UPSC
• Head of department as defined in IREC Rule 103 clause (21) “Head of a department means any
authority which the President may by order declare to be the head of a department for the
purpose of these Rules.
• Railway servant as defined in IREC Rule 103 clause (43)Railway servant means a person who is
a member of a service or holds a post under the administrative control of the Railway Board.
• Rule 3 APPLICATION
This rules shall apply to every Railway servant but shall not apply to
• ANY PERSON WITH SPECIAL PROVISIONS IS MADE BY WITH THE APPROVAL OF PRESIDENT
• PRESIDENT MAY BY ORDER EXCLUDE ANY CLASS OF RAILWAY SERVANTS FROM THESE RULES
• In exceptional circumstances, any authority specified in any of the schedules may place any
subordinate railway servants specified therein, under suspension and report to the authority
concerned, with the circumstances and obtain his approval.
• SUSPENSION
• Suspension maximum for 90 days, it necessity to extend the committee including suspending
authority review before completion of 90 days and extend upto 180 days. Further extension
before completion of 180 days to next 180 days.
• Suspension should be restored / revoked.
• Where, in the opinion of the authority competent to place a Railway servant under
suspension, he has engaged himself in activities prejudicial to the interest of the security of
the state; or
• Where a case against him in respect of any criminal offence, is under investigation, inquiry or
trial
• A Railway servant shall be deemed to have been placed under suspension by an order of the
competent authority by issuing S.F.2
• With effect from the date of his detention, if he is detained in custody, whether on a criminal
charge or otherwise, for a period exceeding forty-eight hours.
• With effect from the date of his conviction if, in the event of a conviction for an offence, he is
sentenced to a term of imprisonment exceeding 48 hours, and is not forthwith dismissed or
removed or compulsorily retired consequent to such conviction.
• Suspension 5.3…
5.3 Where a penalty of dismissal, removal, CR imposed upon a Railway servant under suspension is
set aside in appeal / revision review, modified by the AA/RA and the case remitted back for fresh
enquiry or modified the period from the date of order to date of reinstate is deemed suspension
• Suspension 5.4…
5.4 Where a penalty of dismissal, removal, CR imposed upon a Railway servant is set aside by the
court of law, and the DA on consideration to hold further inquiry from the date of original order of
dismissal/ removal/CR shall continue to remain under suspension until further orders
Rule 1342 A Railway servant under suspension or deemed suspension shall be entitled to the
following payment.
A subsistence Allowance an amount equal to LHAP pay plus DA for the same
When the suspension exceeding 3 months the authority to revise the subsistence allowance
Sub – Rule No.2 No payment shall be made unless the Railway servant furnishes a certificate
the he is not engaged in any other employment. (Non Employment Certificate)
Such extension of suspension shall be for a period not exceeding 180 days at a time
The committee will ordinarily be constituted by the appellate authority and would comprise of
the suspending authority and two officials not lower in rank than the suspending authority.
The committee will submit its recommendation to the authority which constituted the
committee who will then take a decision in the matter;
The Review Committee may take a view regarding revocation/continuation of the suspension
keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into account that
unduly long suspension, while putting the employee concerned to undue hardship, involve
payment of subsistence allowance without the employee performing any useful service to the
Government and make its recommendation.
However, in case the official is in police/judicial custody or is accused of a serious crime or a
matter involving national security, the Review Committee may recommend the continuation
of the suspension of the official concerned
•
PENALTIES Rule 6 [Link]
MINOR PENALTIES
MAJOR PENALTIES
• MINOR PENALITIES
(i) Censure;
breach of orders;
• MINOR PENALITIES
• (iii-b) Reduction to a lower stage in the time scale of pay for a period not exceeding three
years, without cumulative effect and not adversely affecting his pension.
• MINOR PENALITIES
(iv) Withholding of increments of pay for a specified period with further directions as to whether on
the expiry of such period, this will or will not have the effect of postponing the future increments of
pay.
• MAJOR PENALITIES
(v) Save as provided for in clause (iii-b), reduction to a lower stage in the time-scale of pay for a
specified period, with further directions as to whether on the expiry of such period, the reduction will
or will not have the effect of postponing the future increments of his pay;
• MAJOR PENALITIES
(vi) Reduction to a lower lime scale of pay, grade, post or service, with or without further directions
regarding conditions of restoration to the grade or post or service from which the Railway servant was
reduced and his seniority and pay on such restoration to that grade, post or service;
• MAJOR PENALITIES
Railway Administration;
(NOTE: In case removal/dismissal /CR order for compassionate allowance / Pension &Gratutity have
to be given RBE No.79/05 & 164/08)
• Rule11(2) provides that notwithstanding the fact that withholding of increments is a minor
penalty, an inquiry has to be held under Rule 9 which has been prescribed for major penalties,
if the penalty of withholding of increments is for a period exceeding three years or is with
cumulative effect or adversely affects the pensionary benefits.
Disciplinary action can be taken against an employee in respect of misconduct committed before his
employment if the misconduct is of such a nature as has rational connection with his present
employment and renders him unfit and unsuitable for continuing in service.
• Special Provisions
In cases of persons found guilty of passing Railway Signals at danger, one of the penalties specified
in clauses (v) to (ix) of Rule 6 (viz One of the major penalties) shall ordinarily be imposed.
• Special Provisions
• In case of persons found guilty of having accepted or having obtained from any person any
gratification, other than legal remuneration, as a motive or reward for doing or forbearing to
do any official act, one of the penalties specified in clauses (viii) or (ix) of Rule 6 (viz. Removal
or Dismissal) shall ordinarily be imposed.
• In all the three types of cases mentioned above, where the specified penalty is not imposed,
the reasons therefor shall be recorded in writing.
•
Court's powers to interfere with penalties
The Central Administrative Tribunal does not have the power to interfere with the decision of
the competent authority in so far as quantum of penalty to be imposed is concerned.
The Tribunal cannot interfere with the findings of the Inquiry Officer or competent authority
unless they are illogical or bad
•
Court's powers to interfere with penalties
If there has been an enquiry consistent with the rules and in accordance with the Principles of
Natural Justice, what punishment would meet the ends of justice is a matter exclusively within the
jurisdiction of the competent authority.
If a penalty can be lawfully imposed and is imposed on the proof of misconduct, the Tribunal has no
power to substitute its own discretion. The adequacy of the penalty, unless it is malafide is not a
matter for the Tribunals to be concerned with.
• CENSURE
If at the end of the proceedings, it is found that some blame attaches to a Railway Servant, warning/
Govt. Displeasure/ Counseling which are not recognized penalties, should not be imposed. In such
cases, at least the penalty of Censure should be imposed.
•
Withholding of promotion
In cases of loss caused to the Government by negligence, breach of orders, etc., on the part of an
employee, it would be open to the competent authority to inflict, in addition to the penalty of
recovery from pay of the loss caused, any one of the penalties specified in Rule 6 (i), (ii). iii(a), iii (b),
(iv) and (vi) of RS (D&A) Rules, 1968, by way of one and the same order and in pursuance of one and
the same proceedings.
•
Recovery of Loss:
In the case of large sums of recovery of losses, the installments can be so fixed as not to cause undue
hardship to the Railway Servant and his family.
• Withholding of Passes/PTOs:
The penalty of withholding of Passes/PTOs for a period of less than one year should be restricted to
very minor offences as it may not prove to be an effective punishment, except for the slight
inconvenience that may be caused during the period of the punishment since the employee can avail
of all the Passes/PTOs due in the calendar year as soon as the period of punishment expires.
•
Withholding of Passes/PTOs:
In order to make the penalty of withholding of Passes/PTOs effective, the penalty should be imposed
in terms of sets instead of for a specified period. In cases where the employee has already taken all
the Passes/PTOs due in the calendar year, the withholding may be against the next year's account.
• Withholding of Increment:
If a Railway Servant becomes due for promotion after the penalty of withholding of increment is
imposed, he should be promoted only after expiry of the penalty. However, where the penalty of
withholding of increment is to become operative from a future date, the employee should be
promoted in his turn and the penalty imposed in the promotional grade for a period which would not
result in a greater monetary loss.
• Withholding of Increment
• The penalty of withholding of increments can be operative only to the increments to which
the employee has not become entitled on the date on which the penalty order is issued.
• An increment, to which the employee had already become entitled (but which was not
actually drawn) on the date of imposition of the penalty, cannot be withheld. Specified
periods only.
•
Reduction to a lower stage in the same scale of pay
• a. The date from which it will take effect and the period for which the penalty will be
operated,
• b. The stage in the time scale (in terms of rupees) to which the pay is reduced and
• c. The extent (in terms of years and months), if any, to which the period, referred to in (a)
above should operate to postpone future increments,
•
Reduction to a lower stage in the same scale of pay
The reduction to a lower stage in a time scale for an unspecified period or as a permanent measure is
not permissible under the rules. When the pay of an employee is reduced to a particular stage, his pay
will remain constant at that stage for the entire period of reduction.
If the penalty of reduction to a lower stage in time scale is not to operate to postpone future
increments the employee shall be allowed, on expiry of the penalty, the pay which he would have
drawn had he not been reduced.
Where the reduction to a lower grade or post is for a specified period, the employee should be re-
promoted automatically, on expiry of the penalty, to the post from which he was reduced. Such an
order of reduction should clearly specify; The period of reduction; and Whether on re-promotion,
the Railway Servant will regain the original pay and seniority in the higher grade from which he was
reduced.
• Compulsory Retirement
Compulsory retirement is different from premature retirement under Rules 1802, 1803 and 1804 of
IREC. The latter is not a penalty and is ordered as an administrative measure.
The penalties of dismissal, removal and reduction in rank, compulsory retirement has been included
as a major penalty in the Rules and is less severe than the penalties of removal and dismissal.
• Compulsory Retirement
• A Railway Servant who is compulsorily retired from service as a penalty may be granted
pension/ gratuity in terms of provisions contained in Rule 64 of Railway Services (Pension)
Rules, 1993 not less than 2/3rd of the original pension / gratuity.
• A Railway Servant who is dismissed or removed from service forfeits his pension and gratuity.
However, the authority competent to dismiss or remove him from service may, if the case is
deserving of special consideration, sanction a compassionate allowance in terms of Rule 65 of
Railway Service (Pension) Rules, 1993.
• The compassionate allowance not more than 2/3rd of the pension / gratuity. The should
record whether he is entitled for compassionate allowance or not.
• DA not sanctioned compassionate allowance at the time of removal he cann’t reopen the
case.
• The 10 years Q.S, DAR file / SR / LC necessary for considering the facts.
• If the competent authority is decided to sanction compassionate allowance after the death of
the employee, he can sanctioned family pension from the date of death of the deceased
employee.
Removal / Dismissal
• Provident Fund
• Group Insurance
• Removal /Dismissal
• SCHEDULE OF POWERS
• SCHEDULE OF POWERS
• SCHEDULE OF POWERS
• SCHEDULE OF POWERS
No
• Disciplinary proceedings under the Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules can be
initiated and concluded even if court proceedings are pending since the ingredients of
misconduct and the standard of proof required are different in the two types of proceedings.
Initiation and conclusion of departmental action in such cases will not amount to a contempt
of court unless an order is given by a court of law staying the departmental proceedings
• Railway servant officiating in higher post, the disciplinary authority decided according to the
officiating post.
• Any authority competent to impose any of the penalties given in Sch. Can institute
proceedings. At the end of the proceedings, if the penalty proposed to impose not with his
power , he will forward the inquiry proceedings to the appropriate authority for imposing the
penalty.
•
Rule No.9 [Link]
Procedure for imposing major penalties
• CHARGE SHEET
• CHARGE IS AN ACCUSATION
• IN SIMPLE LANGUAGE
•
DELIVERY OF CHARGE SHEET
• Inspect documents
• Warning – no influence
•
DEFENCE STATEMENT
• CONDUCTING
INQUIRY
or
EX-PARTE INQUIRY
• Preliminary inquiry
• Suspension if necessary
• The existence of a prima face charges, justifying the initiation of regular DAR proceedings.
• Charge sheet consists article of charges/ imputation of charges, RUD, and list of witness
• Whether all the charges are admitted by CO. DA can record its findings of each charges.
• DA decide to not to impose major penalty , he ordered for drop the charge sheet or impose
minor penalty.
• I.O Communicate C.O about the date of preliminary inquiry and advice to appear before I.O
on such a day and time.
• The C.O can present the case with the help of D.H for the Preliminary hearing for inspection of
RUD
• The date of Regular inquiry will be fixed with in 1 month P.H for regular hearing .
Examination of C.O by D.H or I.O defense witness and cross examine by I.O or P.O
All DAR proceedings are type and signed by all daily in every pages of inquiry.
Submission written brief by P.O, copy to C.O. Preparation of C.O brief and handed over to I.O
copy to P.O
• Inquiry report shall be prepared by I.O about article of charges, defence statement by C.O,
evidence of each article of charges and his findings
• Issue the penalty with acknowledgement, the name of the A.A and time limit for appeal
•
Ex parte Inquiry
• All the procedures as laid down will be followed except that the employee does not present
himself and does not respond to communications.
• It may be done when the charged employee refuses to participate despite repeated sittings,
but not when he is submitting Medical Certificate of sickness.
• Speaking Order
• The Disciplinary Authority imposing the penalty must apply his /her mind to the facts,
circumstances and records of the case and then record its findings on each imputation of
misconduct or misbehaviour.
• The Disciplinary Authority should give brief reasons for the findings to show that it has applied
its mind to the case. The reasons recorded by the Disciplinary Authority shall be helpful to the
affected employee to prefer an appeal.
• Speaking Order
• When the explanation of the delinquent has not been considered, the reasons for rejecting
must be recorded.
• The Authority must be very careful while passing the penalty order. The term reduction in
stage, scale, grade, pay, post, seniority etc are to carefully and clearly used.
• Orders passed by DA/AA/RA have to be reasoned speaking orders and cannot be one line
orders with application of mind.
• No other officials other than DA/RA/AA can sign the orders under these rules.
• Forward the inquiry report to C.O to get the explanation with in 15 days.
• He may impose the major penalty by issuing speaking order. If the penalty is not under his
power forward the file to appropriate authority
• Informing the Railway servant in writing of the proposal to take action against him for the
statement of imputations
• Consideration by D.A.
• Penalty Advice
• Orders made by the D.A shall be communicated to the Railway servant through proper
channel with ack.
• Where two or more railway servants are concerned in any case, the highest D.A to impose the
penalty of dismissal may institute the proceedings
• 14. (i) where any penalty is imposed on a Railway servant on the ground of conduct which has
led to his conviction on a criminal charge; or
• 14 (ii) where the disciplinary authority is satisfied, for reasons to be recorded by it in writing,
that it is not reasonably practicable to hold an inquiry in the manner provided in these rules;
• 14 (iii) where the President is satisfied that in the interest of the security of the State, it is not
expedient to hold an inquiry in the manner provided in these rules; the disciplinary authority
may consider the circumstances of the case and make such orders thereon as it deems fit:
• Provided that the Railway servant may be given an opportunity of making representation on
the penalty proposed to be imposed before any order is made in a case falling under clause (i)
above:
• Provided further that the Commission shall be consulted where such consultation is necessary,
before any orders are made in any case under this rule.
• Charges are admitted without any qualification but inquiry to be conducted if the D.A decided
to impose the penalty of Compulsory Retirement Removal / Dismissal .
• Borrowing authority can place the servant under suspension and conduct disciplinary
proceedings and inform the lending authority.
• At the end of the proceedings he can impose minor penalties specified up to (iv) after
consultation with lending authority.
• In case Major , submit to lending authority or replace his services and send back to lending
authority.
• can place the servant under suspension and conduct disciplinary proceedings and inform the
lending authority.
• At the end of the proceedings he can impose minor penalties specified up to (iv) after
consultation with lending authority.
• In case Major , submit to lending authority or replace his services and send back to lending
authority with inquiry proceedings.
• APPEAL
• SECOND APPEAL
• REVISION Rule 25
• Any order of an interlocutory in nature or of the nature of step-in-aid of the final disposal of
disciplinary proceedings othen than an order of suspension.
• Means an authority is immediate higher authority who impose the penalty (D.A) except in
some situations stipulated .
• Where a penalty enhanced, either in appeal or on revision, that authority will become D.A and
the charged official have the right to made an appeal / revision accordingly
• Once the authority acted as DA , he never took the case as Appellate Authority or Revisionary
authority.
• Rule 20
PERIOD OF LIMITATION FOR APPEAL
With in 45 days
The A.A may entertain the appeal, after the expiry of the said period, if it is satisfied that the
appellant had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal in time. (Condone of delay)
•
Rule 21. FORM, CONTENTS AND SUBMISSION OF APPEAL
• COMPLETE IN SHAPE.
• CORRECTLY ADDRESSED.
• If the appeal is against suspension the authority shall consider the circumstances and decide
whether suspension is justified or not.
• Disposal of Appeal
Pass an order of –
• After –
- Consultation.
- Conduct of enquiry.
• The Authority which made the order appealed against, shall give effect to the orders passed
by the Appellate Authority.
Second Appeal
• No second appeal lies against the orders of the appellate authority (i) upholding the penalty
already imposed or (ii) reducing the penalty already imposed.
• By President
• By Railway Board.
• By General Manager
• By Divisional Railway Manager in case where no appeal has been preferred, or.
• Any other authority not below the rank of Deputy Head of Department in the case of Railway
servant serving under his control.
-may at any time, either on his either on own or otherwise, call for the records of any inquiry
and revise any order made under these rules or under the rules repealed by Rule 29, after
consultation with the commission, where such consultation with the commission and may,
•
• By an authority higher than the appellate authority.
• Commence on expiry of 45 days time allowed for making appeal where appeal is not intended.
• President at any time either on their own or otherwise can review any order passed already.
- Only when a new material or evidence which could not be produced or was
not available earlier and is capable of changing the order already passed.
• The term sealed cover means the procedure in which the assessment of departmental
promotion committee and granting award by it to the government servant against whom
DAR / Criminal Court Case proceedings is pending.
• The report is kept in sealed cover and shall not be opened till the termination of DAR/Court
case. The procedure adopted in the matter from Group B to A and with in Group A
promotions. Under Suspension, Major penalty SF5 pending, Criminal case pending.
• DAR PROCEEDINGS CAN INITIATE AFTER RETIREMENT ALSO WITH IN 4 YEARS FROM THE DATE
OF RETIREMENT OR OCCURANCE
• A retired DAR pending employees is entitled for Provisional Pension, PF, GIS, Medical facilities
RELHS
• It is therefore reiterated that a lower authority who has merely issued/signed the order
regarding appointment/promotion which has been ordered by a higher authority, is not
competent to impose the penalty or dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement from service
on such Railway servant. Such action is not only violative of the RS(D&A) Rules but also
unlikely to withstand judicial scrutiny.
• DAR-quasi judicial in nature . DAR framed by President under the mandate of Art. 309.
• DA also can recall the witness & examine after submission of I.O report.
• C.O can represent against I.O report within 15 days from the date of receipt.
• AA & RA consult Vigilance / Safety Officer for reducing the penalty major to minor.
• In respect of ADRM and DRM, AGM and GM who have concurrent powers under [Link].
DRM/GM cannot act as R.A if appeal was disposed by ADRM/AGM
• Enhancement of penalty during appeal a notice to be served to C.O if inquiry not holding , to
conduct inquiry.
• C.O can seek personal hearing with D.H to Appellate Authority (Non – gaz.).
• Revision within 45 days. Suo-motto beyond the time limit, it can be done by G.M. Beyond 6
months from the date of the order to be revised in case where it is proposed to increase
penalty. Beyond one year from the date of the order to be revised in case where it is
proposed to cancel the penalty only suomoto & not by revision.
• If the penalty revised the completed part of penalty can be taken in to consideration by
Revisionary Authority.
• DAR Proceedings after retirement, if suspension continue or charge sheet served before
retirement no need to get approval from president.
• Charge sheet retired employee cannot be given in respect of any offence which had taken
place more than 4 years before issue of charge sheet.
• President is vested with the right of with holding / with drawing of pension / gratuity.
• Proceedings were initiated one year or more prior to the date of retirement of C.O, the
proposal should be sent with in 3 months from D.O.R.
• Initiated with in the last year the proposal be sent with in 6 months from DOR.
• DAR
• Form for use sow cause notice action is proposed under Rule 14 (1) - S.F.12
• The decision / enquiry of Complaints Committee under Rule 3C RS conduct rules 1966 shall
be deemed for completion of enquiry proceedings under - Rule.9
• DAR
• Who is the authority for D & AR rules under Art. 309 - President
• No major penalty shall be imposed without holding inquiry specified under Rule .9 &10
• Suspension should not exceed _ days unless it should review by the committee up to ____
days. 90 days / 180 days.
•
THANK YOU
and CONDUCTING
OF INQUIRY
D.A feels that Withholding of increment more than certain years (i.e 36 months) with cumulative
effect.
PURPOSE OF INQUIRY
IN-HOUSE EXERCISE
QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCESS
REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY under PNJ
CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION
WHO IS TO
CONDUCT INQUIRY
D.A. HIMSELF
BOARD OF INQUIRY
INQUIRY OFFICER
i) Where any penalty is imposed on the ground of conduct which has led to his conviction on criminal
charge except consumer act..
ii) DA satisfied that reasons to be recorded in writing, that it is not reasonably practicable to hold an
inquiry in the manner provided in these rules or
Rule No.14
Special Procedure in certain Cases
iii) Where the President is satisfied that in the interest of security of the state it is not expedient to hold
an inquiry in the manner provided in these rules .
Step.1 Identification of competent D.A
In case where no records to find out the appointing authority then the General Manager is the
Disciplinary Authority in that case.
If the supervisor not a D.A he must put to a note to the appropriate authority with the remarks
of the charges and mentioned that I am not competent to take disciplinary action for imposing
major penalty. For orders please.
The charges not obeying order / not doing the assigned work / absconding from work spot /
unauthorized absent etc.,
The D.A should decide Major or Minor. He is unable to decide based on the note he nominate a
supervisor to conduct fact finding inquiry . After receipt of the report he may decided SF.5 or
SF.11.
The staff against whom disciplinary pending / criminal case pending , should not normally
transferred from one Railway / Division to another.
In case transferred the new controlling officer will become D.A and the entire case file should
transfer to him and he will continue the proceedings
SCHEDULE OF POWERS
SCHEDULE OF POWERS
SCHEDULE OF POWERS
SCHEDULE OF POWERS
No
[Link]
No
[Link]
No
MINOR PENALITIES
(i) Censure;
(ii) Withholding of promotion for a
specified period;
or Railway Administration by
MINOR PENALITIES
MAJOR PENALITIES
(v)Save as provided for in clause (iii-b), reduction to a lower stage in the time-scale of pay for a specified
period, with further directions as to whether on the expiry of such period, the reduction will or will not
have the effect of postponing the future increments of his pay;
MAJOR PENALITIES
MAJOR PENALITIES
Step.2
1) Fact finding inquiry is ordered, if necessary to find out the truth. This is mainly to find out
prima facie, whether there is any case.
2) In D.A’s opinion if there are grounds for inquiring into the imputations of misconduct, he
decides to do so.
3) D.A shall decide whether the delinquent railway servant is to be placed under suspension or
not.
Step.3 Preparation of charge sheet Standard Form 5 by the D.A
After identification of D.A and his decision to issue charge sheet, preparing the charge sheet is
the next step for conducting the inquiry.
It is very important since the defective charge sheet may lead to even cancellation of entire
disciplinary proceedings.
It must have the basic aspects viz. Substance, clarity about the specific charges supported by the
documents and witnesses and should be signed by the appropriate D.A with date. D.A has to
avoid signing on behalf of some other officers.
Step.3 Preparation of charge sheet
D.A decide that the charges are more serious he can order to issue major penalty charge sheet S.F.5
Otherwise he can issue minor penalty charge sheet S.F.11
The initial stage in DAR before inquiry
The charges should be specific and supported by proper document(s) and witness (es), Charges
must be specific and should be specific.
The initial stage in DAR before inquiry
I. The lapses or misconduct like habitual late attendance, insubordinate, failure to maintain
integrity, or devotion to duty, including in an act of unbecoming of a public servant are should
be spelled out.
II. If by the lapses attributed to him, he had contravened any rule or order or provisions in the
conduct rule applicable to him, then such rule or order or provision must be mentioned in the
charge after giving the factual allegation.
In the charge sheet mention of IPC (Indian Penal Code) or any other law may not be made because
the employee is to be tried for violation of Railway Rules and they should only be mentioned.
The charges should be drawn up in clear articles of charges, separate for each alleged act of omission
or commission. • The charge must be specific and not vague
The initial stage in DAR before inquiry
Annexure .II
The Article and the Statement of imputations in support of the charges should not be identically
worded.
While the Article of charges should be concise, the imputations should contain details,
references, etc. relating to the charges and should generally give a clear idea about the facts and
circumstances relating to the alleged act.
Specific rules/instructions which may have been violated should be also being mentioned in the
statement of imputations, factual allegation.
The vigilance inspector investigation report should not be included as a relied upon document.
Annex. IV- List of a witness by which the Article of charges is proposed to be sustained-
The Charge Memorandum should be served on the charged official (CO) either in person or
through Registered Post to his permanent address or last address intimated by him.
If returned undelivered with the observations of the Postal Authorities like Door Locked, left
without notice refused to accept, etc. it can be deemed as good as served.
The envelope returned undelivered, should not be opened by the office & must be kept in
sealed condition and preserved.
The Railway employees concerned with the running of trains should not be served with charge sheets
when they are going to start their duty, but only when they are going off duty.
MAJOR PENALTY Charge sheet SF.5
[Link].5 Contains
Charges: OS/Bills of Personnel Branch claimed salary for the absented employee more than 6
months and not even recover the over payment till checking by the Staff and Welfare Inspector:
Model S.F.5
3) For Example, if an employee is unauthorized absented for a long time, the unauthorized absence is
the misconduct. As per conduct rules, should not have absented himself for a long time without proper
sanction of leave. So he violated rule 3 (1) (ii) failure to maintain devotion to duty.
Every Railway Servant should behave politely, Courteously with his colleagues and friends and
obediently with his supervisor. So it is unbecoming of a Railway servant under conduct Rule 3(1)(iii).
ABSOLUTE INTEGRITY
2) Accompanying a lady, under the disguise of wife while using privilege (medical / pass).
3) Used Railway’s money in possession for his personal purpose (i.e) misappropriation of government
money etc.,
4) Claiming of additional increment / additional allowance in bill for the benefit of certain employees.
“Devotion to duty”
1 ) Every railway servant is expected to maintain devotion to duty in his assigned job at all time.
2) The work is not completed on time. Welfare inspector not finalised Pension Adalt case before Adalt.
3) The work is completed but not to the required quality and quantity (JE/SSE/[Link] failed to inspect
the packing of track – result derailment.
4) More mistake in the assigned job caused engine failure / brake failure in loco / carriage
5) While preparing a charge sheet state clearly which rule has violated.
Due to these acts the name of the organisation also spoiled, resulted unbecoming of a Railway
servant.
1) the substance of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior into definite and distinct articles of
charges.
a) a statement of all relevant facts including any admission or confession made by the Railway servant.
b) A list of documents by which , and a list of witness by whom, the article of charges are proposed to be
sustained. The witness are called “administrative witness / prosecution witness”.
1) Article of charges Annexure .I - D.A has to relate, as explained the misbehavior or misconduct with
the conduct rules and convert them in to a definite articles of charges Article of charge means charge of
violating of a conduct Rules, i.e say that he has violated Rule 3(1)(i) of Railway Services (Conduct) Rules
1966, by committing theft (Absolute integrity), he has violated by 3(1)(ii) of Railway Services (Conduct)
Rules 1966 by remaining unauthorizedly absented for 8 months.
4) List of Witness Annexure .IV : The witness to be examined at the time of inquiry to prove the
charges. In the above case absented the list of witness immediate supervisor and Leave clerk.
5) The charges explained must be precise, definite and convey the charged official the exact nature of
the alleged misconduct. And signed by the competent D.A with date.
Contact Rule and Violation
1) Assaulting a supervisor
Rule 3 (A) (a) in the performance of his official duties, act in a discourteous manner
Charge sheet
Article of Charges Annexure. I : XXX while working as XXX has unauthorised absented from duty for
200 days continuously from 01.07.2020 to 16.01.2021 without prior sanction of leave or production of
proper Railway Medical Certificate. He has thus failed to maintain devotion to duty thereby violating
Rule 3(1)(ii) of the Railway Services (Conduct) Rule 1966.
Statement of Imputation Annexure .II : It is reported from the SSE that you are absented yourself from
duty for 200 days continuously from 01.07.2020 to 16.01.2021 without prior sanction of leave or
production of proper Railway Medical Certificate.
D.A shall arrange to deliver the charge sheet to the delinquent railway servant with
acknowledgement
If absented sent to last known address through Registered post with acknowledgement.
Paste the charge sheet in the office notice board with two witness of employees.
Fair and reasonable opportunities are to be given to the delinquent employee for the
preparation of reply statement of defence which includes permitting the railway servant to take
copies from records (or perusing records related to the case.
The reply of defence statement to be submitted with in 10 days. Allowed further 10 days if
requested for inspection of documents after inspecting
If inspection of documents refused the D.A should communicate the same with reason and
allowed further 10 days time
The delinquent employee may submit his documents and witnesses (Persecution witness)
Consideration of written statement of defence by D.A and decide either to conduct inquiry or to
drop the charges framed (or) to decide for imposing minor penalty.
Whether all the charges are admitted by CO. DA can record its findings of each charges. In case
of Compulsory Retirement / Removal and Dismissal inquiry to be conducted even though
charges are admitted by the deliquent employee.
1.
Step.7 Defence statement not received
If written statement of defence is not received D.A should decide whether to conduct inquiry
either by himself or appointed inquiry office and inform the same to delinquent employee.
Ex-Parte Decision to be taken duly consider all the relevant facts and awarding more chances /
Reasonable opportunities to delinquent employee to prove his innocence.
Step.8 Appointment of Presenting Officer
Disciplinary Authority may appoint Presenting Officer to presenting the case on its behalf .
The disciplinary Authority may when consider necessary nominate any Railway Servant as
presenting officer, to present the case in support of charges before the Inquiry Authority. The
presenting officer is mainly appointed in complicated cases where the employees of different
departments are involved (common proceeding) or in serious vigilance cases. Nomination of
Presenting Officer is done on SF8.
After D.A has decided to nominate the inquiry officer , he advices the inquiring authority in
writing.
The official nominated by the Disciplinary authority to conduct disciplinary enquiry is the Inquiry
authority. It could be the Disciplinary Authority itself or a single officer/supervisor or a
committee of two or more officers.
This authority should be impartial, unconnected with the case and not lower in rank to the
charged employee or the officer who held the fact finding enquiry except in
Accident/Vigilance/SPE cases.
Where there is a case of sexual harassment, the Complaints Committee established for
enquiring into it shall be deemed to be the inquiring authority.
Any official who has to give evidence in the inquiry should not be nominated as a member of the
inquiry committee or in any way associated with the disposal of proceedings of that committee.
Board of Inquiry may consist of a gazetted officer or Sr. Subordinates. However, gazetted and non
gazetted officers shall not sit together on one board. The member of the Inquiry Board should not be
subordinate to one another or lower in rank than the accused.
Inquiry Officer
The departmental Inquiry should be conducted by an officer who is sufficiently senior to the officer
whose conduct is being inquired into.
Step.9 &10
Step.9 : Forwarded all the relevant records and documents related to the case to the inquiry officer. A
copy of nomination of I.O to be forwarded to C.O to appear before I.O
Step.10 Inquiry Authority will advise the delinquent railway servant for preliminary inquiry within 10
working days . After his appointment as Inquiry officer
The details to be given to the Inquiry officer {IO} by the disciplinary Authority Rule 9(6)-
i. Charge Memorandum in SF5 with a copy of Articles of Charge and the statement of the imputations of
misconduct.
v. One set of Relied upon Documents in original or attested. (Relied upon Documents supplied to
charged official and Inquiry officer should be identical).
The inquiry officer shall verify the documents received from the Disciplinary Authority and
confirm that all the documents required are available before conducting the DAR Inquiry.
Missing documents, if any, are to be collected from the disciplinary authority before the
commencement of Inquiry.
The Inquiry officer should ensure that intimation has been sent well in time to the delinquent
employee and others regarding the place, time, and date of Inquiry.
The accused be asked to submit a list of defense witnesses if he has not done so.
He should also make necessary arrangements for stenographic assistance for the time to time
recording of the proceedings.
Administration’s side
a) Inquiry officer.
b) Presenting officer.
c) Prosecution /Administrative witness and documents to prove the misconduct misbehavior of
the delinquent Railway servant.
iii)Defence witnesses and documents to prove the Innocence of delinquent railway servants.
i. Preliminary Inquiry.
Step.11
If the Railway servant fails to meet the inquiry officer . Advise the presenting officer to produce the
documents , witnesses etc., so as to prove the article of charges and shall adjourn the case a later date
not exceeding 30 days, and give 10 days time to the delinquent employee for preparing defence
statement
Step.12 & 13
Step.12 The delinquent railway servant may request documents , if any and send his request to the
inquiry authority.
The delinquent employee also intimate the details of defence counsel, his documents and witness
Step.13 : I.O fixes date for inquiry and advices the charged employee.
Defence Councel
The charged employee may present his case with the help of another person who is known as
Defence helper or Defence Councel.
Defence Councel could be another employee or a retired Railway employee or a Trade union
official of a recognised union.
He should not be a legal practitioner and should not be associated with the case in his official
capacity.
Nomination of Defence Councel should be made within 20 days from the date of appointment
of Inquiry Authority.
DEFENCE HELPER.
Step.14 If any request received from the delinquent railway servant for the documents, which are not
sent along with the charge sheet S.F.5, the I.O shall forward the same to the concerned authority who is
in possession of such documents. If I.O feels that the document are not relevant to the case, he may
refuse such request in writing through S.F.6.
Step.15
Step.15 The concerned authority who is in possession of such records has to produce them on
specified time before the I.O or refuse on the grounds that production of such documents would be
against the public interest or security of the state. If received, the I.O has to intimate the delinquent
employee accordingly.
If it is found after the issue of Charge Sheet that additional documents/ witnesses have to be added to
the lists, a suitable corrigendum to the Charge Memorandum should be issued. Minor changes in charge
sheet allowed in corrigendum. But it should be handed over to the delinquent employee before inquiry
proceedings. No corrigendum should be issued after completion of preliminary inquiry. If any major
mistake in charge sheet then drop the charge sheet and issued another charge sheet for the same
charges. Defective charge sheet may lead to drop entire DAR proceedings.
CONDUCTING
OF
INQUIRY
C.O D.H
Steno
I.O
D.W.1
P.O S.W.1
a) Verifying the documents to confirm whether they are sufficient to complete the inquiry.
Otherwise, action may be taken to ask for the same from the Disciplinary Authority.
b) Index Relied upon Documents for better identification, communication, and Recording.
c) Verify the list of witnesses and conform to their proper address (es) and plan for their sequence in
the Inquiry.
d) Arrangements at the venue, proper sitting arrangement, typing facility, etc. are to be taken care of..
Preliminary Inquiry
Preliminary Inquiry is only to create a better platform for the charged Employee, presenting officer
{PO} and the Inquiry officer {IO} to go ahead with the regular inquiry systematically and smoothly.
During the preliminary inquiry if some or all charges are not admitted by the delinquent and it became
necessary to proceed with inquiry, inquiry an officer should frame the issue, draw a time table in
consultation with the delinquent and Presenting Officer about sitting of inquiry, days to be allotted for
prosecution, witness examination, defense witness examination, etc. and should adhere to it.
Preliminary inquiry
During the preliminary sitting, the inquiry authority shall check and ensure that
c. The delinquent has been furnished the opportunity to inspect and take copies of the relied
upon documents quoted in the charge sheet.
Preliminary inquiry
Mandatory questions
5) Are you prepared to commences / begins with the inquiry? The employee may say yes or may
ask for some time for preparation of defence.
6) The charged employee to submit 3 names of his D.H in order of his preference along with
certificate from them that they agree to work D.H
model question
A model question, an Inquiry Officer may ask during the Preliminary inquiry (not exhaustive), will
be as under
Q1. Please introduce your name, designation, and office in which you are working?
model question
YES Proceed .
Q4. Have you been issued with order No. _____ Dated _____ appointing Shri _____ as Inquiry Officer?
Yes noted and Proceed. No. Sort out the issue and asked C.O to submit the 3 names of D.H or record
defend on his own
model question
Yes : Proceed .
model question
Any Bias raised in the Preliminary inquiry against D.A / I.O to be forward to Revisionary Authority and
his decision is final.
(Signature of all attended will be obtained on completion of the day and copy of same will be
given to the delinquent under acknowledgment every day)
Step.16
Step.16 Conducting inquiry proceedings on the appointed date, time and venue as advised to the
delinquent railway servant.
a) The administration witness shall be examine by the P.O , cross examined by the D.H or Delinquent
employee and re-examined by P.O.
b) The defence witnesses shall be examined by the D.H , cross examined by P.O and re-examined by
D.H
c) The I.O may also put such questions to the witness as it thinks fit.
Regular Inquiry
The Inquiry officer should make sufficient homework before starting the regular inquiry.
A list of leading questions, its sequence, and the order in which the witnesses are examined, etc.
are to be planned well in advance.
Normally Presenting officer will ask questions with the intention to prove the case through the
witness, which is called examination
Like introduce your self , Do you know the charges framed against shri. ______
Please narrate the incidents on ______ date etc., No leading questions to be asked.
Cross examination of Prosecution Witness
I.O can ask questions to clear his doubts and involvement of witness in this case called
clarificatory questions .
Any unwanted cross examination not connected with the case can objected by the P.O
Examination
When the charged official ask questions that are not relevant, not appropriate, the Inquiry
officer can give his ruling stating that “charged official and his defense helper may restrict his
question around the article of charge.
Defence witness examined by D.H with the intention not to prove the charges
I.O can ask questions to clear his doubts and involvement of witness in this case.
Any unwanted cross examination not connected with the case can objected by the D.H
The witnesses play a major role in the DAR inquiries to arrive at the proper conclusion.
i. Prosecution witness- is one who is called upon by the administration to prove the charges on
its behalf.
ii. Defense witness- is one who is nominated by the delinquent official to depose and
disapprove of the case of administration
iii. Expert witness- is one who has a special knowledge of a subject, such as a handwriting
expert, fingerprint expert, medical practitioners, etc.
iv. Inquiry officer’s witness- A person who has not been cited in the charge the memo, the
inquiry officer at his discretion allows the P.O. if any to produce evidence not included in the list
given to the Railway Servant.
Witness
v. Hostile witness- is a witness who is summoned by one party but does not depose in his favor.
The party summoned shall declare him as hostile and instead of examining him, may cross-
examine him and a certificate to this effect should be recorded by the Inquiry Officer.
vi. Illiterate witness- in the case of such a witness their statement must be read out to them and
a certificate to this effect should be recorded by the inquiry officer.
Witness
vii. Non- Railway Witness- Where the delinquent cites non-railway men as his witness, it will be
his responsibility to ensure their attendance during the inquire.
viii. Irrelevant Witness- The delinquent may cite a large number of witnesses with an inclination
either to cause delay or confuse the issue. He has to mention the relevance of all the witnesses
cited by him. It is open to the Inquiry Officer to summon only those whom he considers relevant.
witness
IX. The staff of CBI as a witness- There is no bar to call the staff of CBI, even though they had
conducted a preliminary inquiry.
X. Retired railway servant as Witness: Passes may be issued to the retired railway servant as
witnesses.
Re -examination
The witnesses which have already been examined etc. may be recalled for examination, cross-
examination, and re-examination
b. By the disciplinary authority, if he has himself not held the inquiry if he on receipt of the
inquiry report considers/deems it necessary.
Guidelines to Witnesses
Xi. No Government servant can refuse to act as a witness in a departmental inquiry otherwise,
He / She is liable for disciplinary action.
Further, it does not depend upon one’s own choice whether to act as a defense witness or
prosecution witness.
Guidelines to Witnesses
The Inquiry Officer should try to make the witnesses feel comfortable.
Where witnesses give a different statement during the preliminary inquiry and the regular
inquiry, or the court of law, they are guilty of deliberate misrepresentation with the object of
spoiling the case of the Railway administration, and as such the disciplinary action can be taken
against them
This fact should also, be brought to the notice of all witnesses say PW and DW.
Step.17
Step.17 The I.O may advise the P.O to produce new evidence, if he feels it necessary. Once the new
evidence is allowed, the same procedures as mentioned in step .16 will be followed which include
inspection of new documents by the delinquent employee and adjournments, if any. Delinquent
employee can also produce new documents and witness.
Vigilance cases
1) Vigilance cases the draft charge sheet prepared by the Vigilance team with name of the Presenting
Officer and RUD/ witness.
2) The draft charge sheets sent to D.A through the DRM/Confidential section .
3) The D.A has the right to modify the Charge sheet and served with acknowledgement and the ack.
sent to I.O
5) I.O conduct the inquiry. During the preliminary inquiry all the original documents to be examined
by the delinquent employee then fixed the date for regular inquiry.
Vigilance cases
Normally, in vigilance referred DAR cases, Presenting Officer will be from vigilance department.
Vigilance Inspectors appointed as Presenting Officer will co-ordinate with inquiry related
activities and for safe custody of Relied Upon Documents etc.
Since the Relied Upon Documents will be within the custody of Vigilance department, it shall be
ensured that the list of Relied Upon Documents mentioned in Annexure III of the charge
Memorandum is readily available for inspection by the charged Official.
Step.18 & 19
Step.18 : The inquiry proceedings are typed in a sheet daily and signed by the witness, D.H, P.O and
Inquiry Officer. The daily proceedings printed in 5 copies and signed by all. 1 copy to D.H, 1 copy to D.A
for information and progress of the case, 2 copies to be enclosed with the copy of the findings and 1
copy to be retained as office copy by I.O
Step.19: Once the examinations of the witnesses are over , the I.O shall inquire the delinquent employee
about the incident particularly the circumstance appearing in the evidence against him.
Step.20
Step.20 : The inquiry officer may, after the completion of the production of evidence, advise the P.O
to submit the written brief summary of the case.
Then it should forwarded to the delinquent railway servant to submit their defence summary in
writing.
Step.21 :Exparte inquiry has to be conducted if the delinquent employee does not submit the
statement of defence on time or does not attend the inquiry proceedings fails or refuses to comply
with the provisions of rule 9 of D&A rules 1968.
Ensure that records are available to show that all communications regarding conducting inquiry are
received by the delinquent employee on time
Step.22 : After the conclusion of the inquiry the I.O shall prepare the inquiry report based on the
documents, inquiry proceedings, P.O/D.H written brief and it shall contain-
If in the opinion of the I.O, the proceedings of the inquiry establish any article of charge different
from the original articles of charges, it may record its findings on such article of charges, provided that
the findings on such articles of charge shall not be recorded unless the railway servant has either
admitted the facts on which such articles of charge is based or has had a reasonable opportunity of
defending himself against such article of charge.
(1). INTRODUCTION
(1). INTRODUCTION
DEFENCE WITNESSES
DRAWING CONCLUSIONS
The I.O forward the inquiry report to D.A with the following documents.
C. He has to assist the Disciplinary Authority in taking a correct and impartial decision based on
the evidence on record.
F. Official not having a personal interest in the case is to be appointed as an Inquiry Officer.
G. A departmental inquiry is inherently different from judicial proceedings in a court of law and
need not be carried out rigidly following the rules applicable to judicial proceedings.
H. The inquiry officer should ensure that reasonable opportunity is given to the charged official
for defending his case in the course of the inquiry.
I. The Inquiry Officer should ensure that intimation has been sent well in time to the charged
official, presenting officer (if any), and witness, etc. regarding the date, place, and time of
inquiry
J . Once the date is fixed for hearing, it should not be postponed on flimsy grounds.
K. Request for the additional documents which are not mentioned in the list of documents
(Annexure-III) sent to him along with the charge sheet will be considered by the inquiry officer.
At the request of the charged official when the inquiry officer has decided to call for additional
documents, the authority having custody or possession of the documents may decide, that the
production of such documents would be against public interest or security of the state).
The role of inquiry officer
L. The reason for rejecting the employee’s request for producing a witness and or a document
shall be recorded.
M. If any person refuses to sign a statement of evidence, it should be read out to him in full and
should be signed by the inquiry officer that it is a true record of the evidence given by the
accused or witness.
Step.24
D.A after consideration of Report can issue speaking order, or directing for re-inquiry by the
same officer or another officer.
Step.25
Penalty advice to be served with ack. And time limit for appeal / AA
Then Appeal
Then Revision
Rule.9 Procedure for imposing Major Penalties
(Rule 9 (1) to Rule 9 (25))
PROCEDURE–MINOR PENALTY
Statement of imputations
Consideration by D.A.
Penalty Advice
Step.3 Preparation of charge sheet S.F.11
1) [Link] [Link] [Link] is hereby informed that the undersigned proposes to take action
against him under Rule 11 of the Railway servants (Discipline and Appeal ) Rules 1968. A statement of
the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is enclosed.
Step.3 Preparation of charge sheet S.F.11
the memorandum.
3) Fails to submit the representation , will be presumed that he has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against XXXX
Signed by D.A
To:XXX
Step.3 Preparation of charge sheet S.F.11
Statement of Imputations
[Link] [Link] while working as Design. XXX Station:XXX has committed the following
irregularity in that,
He has failed to recover the income tax for the following year 2020-2021 infavour of XXX. The total
income tax calculated as Rs. 1,92,000, but no recovery toward income tax has been made by you in the
financial year 2020-21. The salary bill for the month of Feb.2021 could not be forwarded to accounts
department in time and this has caused inconvenience to the administration.
Thus he has failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty and thereby contravened
the Rule 3(1)(i) and (ii) of the Railway Services (Conduct) Rule 1966.
Signed by D.A
Preliminary inquiry
Re examination if any
Inquiry report with Discus charge by charge and not by witness by witness, narrate charges
proved or not, if additional charges include – opportunity should have been given to defend that
charges also. Remember no charges can be partially proved.
2) Don’t Allow examination of documents with pen in hand – only pencil permitted.
3) Don’t Forget to get proceedings pages signed by the presentee and to counter sign over writing /
corrections if any.
5) Don’t Continue inquiry if biasness is raised – Await clearance from Revisionary Authority.
6) Don’t Conclude inquiry if during Preliminary inquiry the Charged officials accepts all the charges. Ask
to submit written brief in 10 days – Don’t accept oral brief.
7) Don’t proceed ex-parte inquiry Unless there is a proof of charge sheet served. Unless prior
intimation for holding Ex-parte has been given. Unless reasons are recorded as to why going in for a Ex-
parte.
a. A preliminary hearing should invariably be held first after giving due notice, as specified in
Rule .9 (ii).
Formal notice has to be sent to all concerned for all the regular hearing too.
b. During the preliminary hearing, the charged official should be asked by the inquiry officer
whether he has received the charge sheet, understood the charges against him, and whether he
accepts those charges.
The charge official should also be asked if he has inspected the documents listed in the charge
sheet, whether he wants some additional documents and whether he wishes to produce some
defense documents/witnesses.
If any of the defense witnesses are not found to be relevant, the Inquiry Officer may disallow
their evidence and advise the charged official accordingly.
The relevance of any witness may be considered by the Inquiry officer from the charged
official's point of view.
b. If the C.O. requests for production of additional documents during the inquiry and if in the
opinion of the inquiry officer, some or all of the documents are not relevant to the case, then
the Inquiry Officer has to record in writing his reasons for refusal to requisition for production of
such documents, as provided in Rule 9(15) of RS (D&A) Rules and advised the charged official
about the decision.
The inquiry officer has to maintain a daily order sheet which is the record of all the business
transacted by him on day to day basis of the conduct of the Inquiry.
The facts relating to notices sent, taking on record the documents, request/ representations
made by either party or decision of the inquiry/officer thereon and the examination/cross
examination undertaken should find a mention in the daily order sheet.
The daily order sheets should be dated and signed by the inquiry officer and serially-numbered.
The daily order sheets should indicate whether a reasonable opportunity has been given to the
charged official, whether the procedure prescribed in the rule has been adhered to etc.
In addition to the Daily Order Sheet, the Inquiry Officer has to maintain the record of the inquiry
proceedings in detail.
It should contain the date of the proceedings, the officials present, and the examination/cross-
examination of the witnesses in form of questions and answers and any decision was taken by
the inquiry officer during the proceedings regarding dropping of a witness, allowing/ rejecting
the requests of the C.O. for production of additional documents, witnesses, etc. these should be
signed by I.O., P.O., C.O., D.C., and Witness present during the hearing.
Copy of proceedings should be given to the delinquent employee at the end of each day’s
proceedings.
The record of proceedings can either be in Hindi or English. Principles of natural justice require
that the delinquent officer must have a reasonable opportunity to defend himself.
The inquiry officer should explain the proceedings to the charged official in a language known to
him and it should be ensured that he understands and accepts the same before his signature is
obtained.
During the inquiry, the evidence on behalf of the Disciplinary Authority has to be produced first.
It would be incorrect to examine the charged official first, as this would deprive the C.O. of the
opportunity of effective defense.
All the documents listed in the charge memorandum have to be taken on record and marked as
Exhibit No. ---- and signed by the Inquiry Officer.
All the witnesses listed in the charge memorandum have then to be examined one by one in the
presence of the charged officials.
After examination of each prosecution witness (also called examination in chief) the charged
official has to be allowed to cross-examine the witness.
After cross-examination of the prosecution witness, the inquiry officer may put such questions
to the witness as he thinks fit.
If any of the witnesses had either given any statement during the investigation, fact-finding
inquiry, etc. he should be asked during the inquiry to confirm the said statement before it is
taken on record as evidence.
If the statement is quite comprehensive, a mere confirmation of the statement by the witness
should suffice during the inquiry instead of a de novo examination of the witness.
If re-examination by the presenting officer is allowed on any new matter, then an opportunity
should be given for further cross-examination of the witness concerned on such new matter.
REPORT WRITING
(1). INTRODUCTION
(1). INTRODUCTION
WRITTEN BRIEF
(3). DEFENCE OF THE CHARGED OFFICIAL
DEFENCE WITNESSES
DRAWING CONCLUSIONS
Thank You