Mining Equipment Efficiency Metrics
Translated by
ScribdTranslationsMining Equipment Efficiency Metrics
Translated by
ScribdTranslationsEFFICIENCY OF MINING EQUIPMENT
1) Mechanical Availability
Formula:
DM (%) = (HP-(MPP + RME))/HP x 100%
Where:
HP: Scheduled Hours
MPP: Scheduled + preventive maintenance
RME: Mechanical electrical repair
2) Utilization Factor
Formula:
U (%) = (HD-(TI+DO+OD))/HD x 100%
Where:
YOU: Unproductive time
HD: Hours available (Maintenance area)
DO: Operational delays
OD: Other delays
3) Effective use of the machine (Productive Time)
Formula:
Ue = HNO/HP x 100%
BROTHER: Net hours of operation
HP: Scheduled hours
Ue = DM(%)*U(%)
EXERCISE - CALCULATION
1) Calculation of mechanical availability
X day
HT Total Hours 24
HP Scheduled Hours 24 X week
MPP Scheduled + preventive maintenance h
RME Mechanical electrical repair h
DM = (HP - (MPP+RME))/HP x 100%
DM = 84%
2) Calculation of Utilization
Hours available (HD) 20.2 hrs x HP*DM(%)
Hours available in operation: day 7:00 AM
Unproductive time (IT): 21.0 hrs x
Operational Delays (OD): day
Other Delays (OD): 4hrs x day
Net hours of operation (NHO): 2.5 hrs per
Hourmeter d
day
2hrs per
U(%)= (HD-(TI+DO+OD))/HD x 100% day
58% hrs x
11.7
day
3) Effective utilization (productive time)
Ue = HNO/HP x 100%
Ue = DM(%)*U(%) 49%
49%
Observations:
The control is towards the machine, NOT THE OPERATION OR THE OPERATOR
There is a continuous discrepancy between operation and maintenance due to lack of
knowledge
X fortnight X
mont
720 h
h
65 h
48 h Not
607 foreseeable
0.84305556
6:30 PM
and the
machine
EFFICIENCY OF MINING EQUIPMENT
1) Mechanical Availability
Formula:
DM (%) = (HP-(MPP + RME))/HP x 100%
Where:
HP: Scheduled Hours
MPP: Scheduled + preventive maintenance
RME: Mechanical electrical repair
2) Utilization Factor
Formula:
U (%) = (HD-(TI+DO+OD))/HD x 100%
Where:
HD: Hours available (Maintenance area)
YOU: Unproductive time
DO: Operational delays
OD: Other delays
3) Effective use of the machine (Productive Time)
Formula:
Ue = HNO/HP x 100%
BROTHER: Net hours of operation
HP: Scheduled hours
Ue = DM(%)*U(%)
EXERCISE - CALCULATION
1) Calculation of mechanical availability
X day X week
HT Total Hours 24
HP Scheduled Hours 24
MPP Scheduled + preventive maintenance
RME Mechanical electrical repair
DM = (HP - (MPP+RME))/HP x 100%
DM = 91%
2) Calculation of Utilization
Hours available (HD) 653.5 hrs per HP*DM(%)
Hours available in operation: monthhrs x 7:00 AM
Unproductive time (IT): month
110 hrs per
Operational Delays (OD): month
50 hrs per
Other Delays (OD):
month
Net hours of operation (NHO):
35 hrshrs
458.5 perx month Hourmeter d
U(%)= (HD-(TI+DO+OD))/HD x 100% 70.16% 70.16%
U(%) = HNO/HD*100%
3) Effective use (productive time)
Ue = HNO/HP x 100% 64%
Ue = DM(%)*U(%) 64%
Observations:
The control is towards the machine, NOT THE OPERATION OR THE OPERATOR
There is a continuous discrepancy between operation and maintenance due to lack of knowledge
X fortnight X month
720 h
48.5 h
18 h No
foreseeable
653.5
0.90763889
653.5 (Note, this is the meaning of available)
6:30 PM
and the machine
Common questions
Powered by AITo calculate the effective utilization (Ue) of mining equipment over a specific period, use the formula Ue = HNO/HP x 100% where HNO is the net hours of operation and HP is the scheduled hours. Alternatively, it can be calculated as Ue = DM(%)*U(%). Variables directly influencing this calculation include the actual hours the equipment is operational, total scheduled time, mechanical availability (DM%), and the utilization rate (U%), which considers all productive and non-productive time allocations within the operational framework .
The effective use of mining equipment, denoted as Ue and calculated using Ue = HNO/HP x 100% or Ue = DM(%)*U(%), measures the percentage of scheduled time that the equipment is effectively used for its intended purpose. The utilization factor, U (%), measures the actual operational time against the total available hours. Both metrics are interrelated as they reflect the efficiency and productivity of equipment usage. However, differentiating between them is crucial, as one indicates potential mechanical availability (DM) affecting capacity (Ue) and the other reflects practical use constraints (U). Understanding both helps identify performance bottlenecks and opportunities for improvement .
'Other Delays' (OD) in mining equipment utilization refers to any time lost to factors outside scheduled maintenance and typical operational delays, such as administrative hold-ups and unforeseen incidents. These delays are significant as they directly reduce the equipment's utilization factor, thus impacting overall productivity. Measures to minimize these include implementing stricter schedule adherence, introducing redundancy in critical systems, using predictive analytics to foresee potential disruptions, and refining the overall project management practices to streamline processes .
Preventive maintenance plays a pivotal role in the overall mechanical availability of mining equipment as it helps mitigate unexpected breakdowns and extends the operational lifespan of machinery. Its impact on operational productivity is twofold—positively, it reduces unscheduled downtimes by addressing potential faults before failure; however, during maintenance, equipment is temporarily offline, reflected in reduced availability for actual productive work. Strategizing preventive maintenance schedules to balance immediate availability and long-term reliability is crucial in maximizing overall productivity for mining operations .
The utilization factor of mining equipment is determined using the formula U (%) = (HD-(TI+DO+OD))/HD x 100%, where HD is the hours available, TI is unproductive time, DO is operational delays, and OD are other delays. To optimize this factor, management must effectively reduce unproductive time and operational delays through better operational planning and monitoring. Ensuring timely maintenance and addressing any causes of idle time can help maximize the hours available for productive work .
The main components for calculating the mechanical availability of mining equipment are HP (Scheduled Hours), MPP (Scheduled + preventive maintenance), and RME (Mechanical electrical repair). Each component influences the final availability percentage as follows: HP represents the total time the equipment is supposed to be in operation. MPP and RME represent the time the equipment is offline for scheduled maintenance and repairs. The formula DM (%) = (HP-(MPP + RME))/HP x 100% shows that as MPP and RME increase, the mechanical availability percentage decreases, indicating less time available for productive work .
'Scheduled Hours' (HP) are critical in evaluating mining equipment efficiency as they represent the baseline total time allocated for equipment operation. Discrepancies in scheduled hours can arise from inaccurate planning, unforeseen equipment failures leading to reactive maintenance, or logistical issues that overlap or extend scheduled maintenance periods beyond planned limits. Actions to rectify these discrepancies involve improving planning accuracy through predictive maintenance, ensuring timely resource allocation, and enhancing coordination between operational and maintenance teams to adhere to scheduled timelines effectively .
Ineffective communication between operations and maintenance has profound implications on the efficiency of mining equipment. It can lead to uncoordinated schedules, unnecessary equipment downtimes, and unoptimized utilization of machines, thereby reducing operational efficiency. Misunderstandings may result in premature or delayed maintenance activities, impacting the equipment's lifecycle and increasing repair costs. To improve efficiency, clear communication protocols and integrated management systems are essential to align operational and maintenance goals .
The continual discrepancy between operation and maintenance in mining equipment is primarily due to a lack of knowledge and ineffective communication between the two sectors. Maintenance controls focus solely on the machine, not on the operation or the operator, which leads to misunderstandings and inefficiencies in scheduling and priorities. Potential solutions include improving cross-departmental communication, implementing joint training sessions for operators and maintenance staff to understand each other's roles better, and integrating real-time machine data analytics to streamline scheduling and predictive maintenance .
Focusing solely on machine control rather than operator performance affects the monitoring of mining equipment efficiency by potentially neglecting the human factors crucial in equipment operation. This approach may overlook errors or inefficiencies in operator performance that can impact equipment utilization and productivity. Monitoring that includes operator assessment can lead to better training programs, optimized workflows, and refined operational strategies that enhance both machine efficiency and overall site productivity .