0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views7 pages

Structural Optimization Project Results

The document presents results from a structural optimization project involving multiple configurations of points defined by length (L), breadth (B), and depth (d). It concludes that intersection of figures in the vertical plane prevents mesh generation, and notes that increasing the distance between rectangles increases steepness, while larger inner rectangles reduce the area between them. The project was conducted by Caridad Murcia, Aitana Puig, and Miriam Bellido at TU Wien.

Uploaded by

Aitana Puig
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views7 pages

Structural Optimization Project Results

The document presents results from a structural optimization project involving multiple configurations of points defined by length (L), breadth (B), and depth (d). It concludes that intersection of figures in the vertical plane prevents mesh generation, and notes that increasing the distance between rectangles increases steepness, while larger inner rectangles reduce the area between them. The project was conducted by Caridad Murcia, Aitana Puig, and Miriam Bellido at TU Wien.

Uploaded by

Aitana Puig
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Structural optimization

206.341

Caridad Murcia Selma


Aitana Puig Rocher
Miriam Bellido Palau
Result 1

L: 4
B: 8
d: 1
Point(1) = {0, 0, 0, d};
Point(2) = {L, 0, 0, d};
Point(3) = {0, B, 0, d};
Point(4) = {L, B, 0, d};
Point(5) = {L/8, B/2, 1, d};
Point(6) = {2*L/4, B/3, 1, d};
Point(7) = {L/8, 2*B/2, 1, d};
Point(8) = {2*L/4, 2*B/3, 1, d}

TU Wien Structural optimization 206.341 Final project I Caridad Murcia I Aitana Puig I Miriam Bellido
Result 2

L: 4
B: 8
d: 1
Point(1) = {0, 0, 0, d};
Point(2) = {L, 0, 0, d};
Point(3) = {0, B, 0, d};
Point(4) = {L, B, 0, d};
Point(5) = {0, 0, 1, d};
Point(6) = {2*L/2, 0, 1, d};
Point(7) = {0, 2*B/2, 1, d};
Point(8) = {2*L/2, 2*B/2, 1, d};

TU Wien Structural optimization 206.341 Final project I Caridad Murcia I Aitana Puig I Miriam Bellido
Result 3

L: 10
B: 10
d: 1
Point(1) = {0, 0, 0, d};
Point(2) = {L, 0, 0, d};
Point(3) = {0, B, 0, d};
Point(4) = {L, B, 0, d};
Point(5) = {L/3, B/3, 1, d};
Point(6) = {2*L/3, B/3, 1, d};
Point(7) = {L/3, 2*B/3, 2, d};
Point(8) = {2*L/3, 2*B/3, 2, d};

TU Wien Structural optimization 206.341 Final project I Caridad Murcia I Aitana Puig I Miriam Bellido
Result 4

L: 6
B: 6
d: 1
Point(1) = {0, 0, 0, d};
Point(2) = {L, 0, 0, d};
Point(3) = {0, B, 0, d};
Point(4) = {L, B, 0, d};
Point(5) = {L/6, B/6, 2, d};
Point(6) = {5*L/6, B/6, 2, d};
Point(7) = {L/6, 5*B/6, 2, d};
Point(8) = {5*L/6, 5*B/6, 2, d};

TU Wien Structural optimization 206.341 Final project I Caridad Murcia I Aitana Puig I Miriam Bellido
Result 5

L: 4
B: 8
d: 1
Point(1) = {0, 0, 0, d};
Point(2) = {L, 0, 0, d};
Point(3) = {0, B, 0, d};
Point(4) = {L, B, 0, d};
Point(5) = {L/8, B/3, 1, d};
Point(6) = {2*L/4, B/3, 1, d};
Point(7) = {L/8, 2*B/3, 1, d};
Point(8) = {2*L/4, 2*B/3, 1, d};

TU Wien Structural optimization 206.341 Final project I Caridad Murcia I Aitana Puig I Miriam Bellido
Conclusion

● When the two figures intersect in the vertical plane, the mesh cannot be
. generated.

● The higher the distance between the two rectangles, the bigger the steepness.

● The bigger the inner rectangle, the smaller area between the two rectangles,
being the limit the size of the external rectangle.

TU Wien Structural optimization 206.341 Final project I Caridad Murcia I Aitana Puig I Miriam Bellido

You might also like