0% found this document useful (0 votes)
152 views23 pages

HelloFresh SWOT Analysis 2024 Overview

The document provides a comprehensive analysis of HelloFresh, the leading meal kit provider, focusing on its business strategy, macro-environmental factors, and competitive positioning. It employs frameworks such as Porter's Five Forces and Bowman's Clock to evaluate HelloFresh's market dynamics, strategic challenges, and stakeholder relationships. The analysis highlights the company's commitment to sustainability, operational efficiency, and customer-centric approach as key drivers of its success in the meal kit industry.

Uploaded by

daniel obi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
152 views23 pages

HelloFresh SWOT Analysis 2024 Overview

The document provides a comprehensive analysis of HelloFresh, the leading meal kit provider, focusing on its business strategy, macro-environmental factors, and competitive positioning. It employs frameworks such as Porter's Five Forces and Bowman's Clock to evaluate HelloFresh's market dynamics, strategic challenges, and stakeholder relationships. The analysis highlights the company's commitment to sustainability, operational efficiency, and customer-centric approach as key drivers of its success in the meal kit industry.

Uploaded by

daniel obi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

MODULE NUMBER: BS4104

MODULE: TITLE BUSINESS STRATEGY

1
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction..............................................................................................................................2

2.0 Macro-environmental Factors...............................................................................................3

3.0 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis of HelloFresh......................................................................4

3.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers.........................................................................................5

3.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers.............................................................................................5

3.3 Threat of Substitutes..........................................................................................................6

3.4 Threat of New Entrants......................................................................................................6

3.5 Competitive Rivalry............................................................................................................6

4.0 Key Strategic Issue................................................................................................................6

5.0 Bowman’s Clock for Competitive Positioning of HelloFresh............................................7

6.0 Stakeholder Analysis / Mapping HelloFresh......................................................................9

7.0 SWOT and TOWS Analysis and Conclusion....................................................................13

References...................................................................................................................................17

2
1.0 Introduction
HelloFresh, the world's biggest meal kit provider, has transformed the food market with
its revolutionary business approach. HelloFresh was founded in Berlin in 2011 and has
swiftly expanded globally, delivering over 1 billion meals in 2022 alone (HelloFresh
Group, 2023). The company's objective to forever transform people's eating habits is
based on offering convenient, high-quality, and sustainable food options (HelloFresh,
2023). HelloFresh has a strong presence in the United States, one of its core markets,
and has exhibited strategic interest through its multi-brand strategy, technology
improvements, and dedication to sustainability.

HelloFresh stands apart strategically for its direct-to-consumer e-commerce approach,


which caters to a wide range of client demands through customizable meal kit plans
(Quarter, 2024). The company's success is fueled by a combination of operational
efficiency and a great grasp of customer preferences, with nearly 75% of the meal kit
market in the United States and Europe (Quarter, 2024). Furthermore, HelloFresh's
dedication to sustainability is visible in its efforts to decrease food waste, carbon
emissions, and packaging innovation, positioning it as a market share and corporate
responsibility leader (HelloFresh, 2023; HelloFresh SE, 2023).

This report will delve into the macro-environmental factors influencing HelloFresh’s
market, apply Porter’s 5 Forces to understand the competitive landscape, and identify
key strategic issues. Subsequently, strategic models such as Bowman’s Clock and
Stakeholder Analysis will be employed to evaluate HelloFresh’s ability to sustain a
competitive advantage. The analysis will culminate in a SWOT/TOWS assessment,
providing a comprehensive overview of HelloFresh’s strategic positioning.

2.0 Macro-environmental Factors


HelloFresh works in a difficult macro-environment driven by a variety of external forces
in the rapidly changing meal kit business (Gini and Agala, 2023). The company's
dedication to sustainability is in reaction to rising environmental concerns that influence
customer behavior (Rustam, et al., 2020). HelloFresh's concept has been
demonstrated to emit 31% less carbon than typical supermarkets due to a shorter

3
supply chain and the use of renewable power in its facilities (HelloFresh, 2020).
Furthermore, the meal kit service has set lofty targets for reducing carbon emissions
and food waste drastically by 2025, promoting itself as an environmentally responsible
option for customers (Sigcha, et al., 2020; HelloFresh Group, 2024).

Economic aspects are also important, since the meal kit sector has experienced an
increase in demand, owing in part to the pandemic's influence on consumer habits
(Financial Times, 2021). Social trends towards convenience, health consciousness, and
ethical consumerism further enhance HelloFresh’s market position (Ghvanidze et al.,
2016). HelloFresh has optimized its operations and customer experience thanks to
technological breakthroughs in supply chain management and data analytics
(HelloFresh Group, 2024). Legal and political considerations, such as food safety
standards and trade policies, continue to shape operating tactics (Henson and Caswell,
1999; Buye, 2021). As HelloFresh navigates these macro-environmental issues, it
remains ready to adapt and grow in the ever-changing global food industry.

3.0 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis of HelloFresh


Porter's Five Forces is a strategic analysis tool created by Michael E. Porter in 1979 to
help businesses identify competitive forces in their sector and formulate company
strategies (Yüksel, 2012). The framework evaluates five primary dynamics (competitive
rivalry, threat of new entrants, supplier bargaining power, buyer bargaining power, and
threat of alternatives) that influence market competitive intensity and attractiveness
(Dobbs, 2014). (fig. 1). Businesses utilize the Five Forces model to identify profitability
and competitiveness drivers, examine strengths and weaknesses, determine whether to
enter a given sector, and design plans to improve their competitive position (Birru, et al.,
2022). Despite criticism for being overly static in a dynamic global market and failing to
adapt to rapid technology developments (Dälken, 2014). Porter's Five pressures model
continues to be a useful tool for evaluating competitive pressures and developing
efficient company strategies. It offers a methodical approach to studying competition
and can serve as a foundation for developing effective company strategies (Bruijl,
2018).

4
Figure 1: Porter’s Five Forces Model (Steenkamp, 2007)

3.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers


HelloFresh has built a strong supply chain with over 1,500 suppliers that prioritize
quality and sustainability. The company's supplier onboarding procedure guarantees
that partners satisfy strict safety and quality requirements, with approved suppliers
accounting for over 90% of all produce (HelloFresh, 2020). HelloFresh orders just what
is required, reducing waste and increasing efficiency (HelloFresh, 2020). This method
diminishes suppliers' bargaining power and adds to HelloFresh's competitive advantage
(Birru, et al., 2022)

3.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers


The meal kit industry is characterized by a high degree of buyer concentration, with a
few large players like HelloFresh dominating the market (Katte, 2019). However,

5
HelloFresh’s focus on customer retention and its use of data analytics to optimize
offerings has enabled it to maintain a loyal customer base, thereby reducing the
bargaining power of buyers (Quartr, 2024).

3.3 Threat of Substitutes


Substitutes for HelloFresh’s meal kits include traditional supermarkets, restaurants, and
other meal delivery services (Khan and Sowards, 2018). Despite this, HelloFresh’s
unique value proposition, which combines convenience with healthy and sustainable
food options, has allowed it to mitigate the threat of substitutes (Dobbs, 2014).

3.4 Threat of New Entrants


The meal kit industry presents barriers to entry such as brand equity, product
differentiation, and economies of scale, which HelloFresh has successfully navigated.
The company’s market leadership and operational efficiency act as deterrents to new
entrants, securing its competitive position (Beckmann, 2021).

3.5 Competitive Rivalry


HelloFresh faces competition from other meal kit providers like Blue Apron and Green
Chef. However, its market share of approximately 75% in the US and Europe signifies
its dominance (Statista, 2024). The company’s continuous innovation and expansion
into new product lines have enabled it to stay ahead of competitors (Katte, 2019)

4.0 Key Strategic Issue


HelloFresh has a critical strategic challenge in striking a balance between expansion
and profitability. As the firm develops its market reach and product offerings, it faces the
problem of being cost-effective (Kleindorfer, et al., 2005). The vigorous marketing
necessary to maintain expansion incurs large client acquisition expenses, which might
reduce profit margins (Yannopoulos, 2011). Furthermore, HelloFresh must deal with the
unpredictability of food costs, which might affect its cost structure and pricing strategy
(Yuan, and Lai, 2023). To address these difficulties, HelloFresh is concentrating on
strategic product development and market expansion, as well as cost reduction through
supply chain optimization (HelloFresh Group, 2021). This strategic challenge highlights

6
the importance for HelloFresh to maintain a careful balance between expansion efforts
and operational efficiency in order to secure long-term viability (Closs, et al.,2011)

5.0 Bowman’s Clock for Competitive Positioning of


HelloFresh
Bowman’s Strategic Clock is a model that expands upon the basic framework of
Porter’s Five Forces to analyze a company’s competitive position in relation to its rivals
(Villagrasa, et al., 2023). It offers a systematic approach to considering how a company
can achieve a competitive edge beyond just cost leadership or differentiation. The clock
has eight positions, each representing a different strategy based on price and perceived
value (Alles and Yazdanifard, 2017) as seen in figure 2 below.

Figure 2: Bowman's Strategy Clock

7
Source: (Alles and Yazdanifard, 2017)

HelloFresh’s positioning can be analyzed through this framework to understand its


strategic choices in the meal kit delivery market.

 Low Price and Low Added Value (Position 1): HelloFresh does not typically
compete in this quadrant, as its value proposition is based on quality and
convenience rather than being the lowest-cost provider. However, it does offer
more affordable meal plans to cater to a broader market, ensuring that price-
sensitive customers have options within its portfolio (HelloFresh Group, 2021).
 Low Price (Position 2): HelloFresh has managed to keep prices competitive
through efficient supply chain management and economies of scale. By directly
sourcing from producers and optimizing logistics, HelloFresh offers competitively
priced meal kits without compromising on quality (HelloFresh, 2024).
 Hybrid (Position 3): HelloFresh excels in this position by offering a high-quality
product at a reasonable price. The company’s use of data analytics to streamline
operations and personalize offerings allows it to deliver value to customers while
maintaining cost-effectiveness (Quartr, 2024).
 Differentiation (Position 4): HelloFresh differentiates itself through its focus on
sustainability, fresh ingredients, and a diverse menu that caters to various dietary
preferences. This unique selling proposition justifies a premium price compared
to standard grocery shopping (HelloFresh, 2020).
 Focused Differentiation (Position 5): In this quadrant, HelloFresh targets
specific market segments with specialized offerings like its Green Chef brand,
which provides meal kits for specialty diets such as vegan, keto, and paleo (New
Food Magazine, 2021).
 Increased Price/Standard Product (Position 6): HelloFresh avoids this
positioning, as it would not align with its value proposition of delivering quality
and convenience (Echchakoui, 2018).

8
 Increased Price/Low Values/monopoly pricing (Position 7): This position is
not viable for HelloFresh, as it would contradict the company’s commitment to
quality and customer satisfaction (Desai, 2019).
 Low Value/Standard Price (Position 8): HelloFresh does not operate in this
space, as it consistently aims to provide high value to its customers (Shakhshir,
2014)

HelloFresh’s strategic positioning on Bowman’s Clock is primarily between positions 3


and 5, where it leverages its operational efficiency and focus on differentiation to offer a
superior product at a competitive price. The company’s ability to innovate and adapt to
consumer trends has solidified its competitive advantage in the meal kit delivery market
(Quartr, 2024).

6.0 Stakeholder Analysis / Mapping HelloFresh


A stakeholder is defined as any individual, group, or organization that is interested in or
influenced by the actions and consequences of a business or project (Freeman, 2010).
Stakeholder analysis is the process of identifying and analyzing various stakeholders'
interests, requirements, and potential influence on the project or organization (Jepsen
and Eskerod, 2009). It entails determining how stakeholders may be impacted by, or
may influence, the organization's activities, goals, and policies (Kennon, et al.,2009).
The analysis is significant because it helps align plans to fulfill stakeholder concerns
and expectations (Aithal and Aithal, 2023).

Stakeholder mapping is a visual technique used for stakeholder analysis. It aids in


grouping stakeholders according to their level of interest and impact (Reymond et al.,
2014). The mapping process frequently produces a matrix or grid that categorizes
stakeholders, which aids in the formulation of communication strategies and
engagement plans. This graphic depiction helps to prioritize stakeholder interactions
and adjust methods to different stakeholder groups (Polonsky and Scott, 2005).
Effective stakeholder analysis and mapping are critical for any company because they
reveal who the important actors are, what motivates them, and how to effectively
connect with them to ensure the success of business objectives (Hayes, et al., 2010).

9
Stakeholder analysis and mapping are critical for understanding the influence and
interests of various groups on HelloFresh’s operations and strategic decisions. The key
stakeholders of HelloFresh are;

 Customers: As the primary stakeholders, customers drive HelloFresh’s business


model. The company’s commitment to providing convenient, high-quality meal
kits has resulted in a loyal customer base. HelloFresh’s use of customer
feedback to innovate its product offerings demonstrates the importance of this
stakeholder group (HelloFresh Group, 2021).
 Suppliers: HelloFresh’s suppliers are integral to its value chain, providing the
fresh ingredients that are central to the brand’s promise. The company works
closely with its suppliers to ensure quality and sustainability, often engaging in
long-term contracts to secure supply and stabilize prices (HelloFresh Group,
2022)
 Employees: HelloFresh’s employees are key to its success, from the culinary
team developing new recipes to the logistics staff ensuring timely delivery. The
company invests in employee development and maintains a focus on diversity
and inclusion, recognizing the impact of its workforce on overall performance
(HelloFresh Group, 2022).
 Investors: Investors provide the capital necessary for HelloFresh’s growth and
expansion. The company’s consistent financial performance and market
leadership have attracted a diverse group of investors, including venture capital
firms and individual shareholders (HelloFresh Group, 2021).
 Community: As a food service provider, HelloFresh has a significant impact on
the community. The company’s sustainability initiatives, such as reducing food
waste and carbon emissions, reflect its commitment to corporate social
responsibility (HelloFresh, 2020)
 Regulators: Regulatory bodies oversee HelloFresh’s compliance with food
safety, labor laws, and environmental regulations. The company’s adherence to
these regulations is crucial for maintaining its operational license and public trust
(HelloFresh Group, 2021).

10
 Competitors: HelloFresh operates in a competitive market, with rivals like Blue
Apron and Green Chef. The company’s strategic focus on innovation and
customer experience helps it maintain a competitive edge (HelloFresh Group,
2024).
 Partners: Strategic partners, including technology providers and logistics
companies, enable HelloFresh to optimize its operations. Collaborations with
these partners are essential for maintaining efficiency and scalability (HelloFresh
Group, 2024)

In mapping these stakeholders, HelloFresh must consider the power and interest of
each group. Customers and investors, for example, have high power and interest,
requiring close engagement and regular communication. Suppliers and employees also
have significant power but may have varying levels of interest, necessitating tailored
engagement strategies (Aithal and Aithal, 2023). The stakeholder map for HelloFresh
would place customers and investors in the high power-high interest quadrant, reflecting
their critical role in strategic decisions. Employees and suppliers would be in the high
power-low interest quadrant, indicating the need for engagement and partnership.
Regulators would be in the low power-high interest quadrant, as their interest in
compliance is high, but their direct power over strategic decisions is more limited.
Competitors and the community would fall into the low power-low interest quadrant,
where monitoring and occasional engagement (Reymond et al., 2014). are appropriate
as shown in the figure 3 below

11
Stakeholder Analysis of HelloFresh

 HelloFresh Suppliers  HelloFresh Investors


 HelloFresh Employees  HelloFresh Customers
High
 HelloFresh Partners

Keep Satisfied Manage Closely

 HelloFresh Competitors  Regulators


Power
 Community

Monitor
(Minimum Effort) Keep Informed

Low Interest High


Low

Figure 3: Stakeholder Map of HelloFresh

Source: Self-made by the Author

12
This analysis highlights the importance of a balanced approach to stakeholder
management, ensuring that HelloFresh’s strategic decisions align with the interests and
influences of its key stakeholders (Polonsky and Scott, 2005).

HelloFresh, a leading food company, has been adapting its strategies to meet the
changing needs and expectations of its stakeholders, including customers, suppliers,
employees, investors, and the communities in which it operates. The company has
evolved its relationship with customers from providing meal kits to creating a
comprehensive food experience that emphasizes health, convenience, and
sustainability (Cho et al., 2020). This shift has been driven by responsiveness to
customer feedback and changing preferences (Yusuf, et al., 1999) As HelloFresh
continues to grow, it continues to invest in its workforce, recognizing the importance of a
diverse and skilled team for innovation and operational excellence. The company
fosters an inclusive culture where employees are encouraged to contribute ideas and
share in the success of the organization. Investors have shown a mature relationship
with HelloFresh, as the company demonstrates consistent growth and profitability
(HelloFresh SE., 2023). They are increasingly interested in the company's long-term
strategy, including plans for market expansion and product diversification. Community
engagement has evolved to include various social responsibility initiatives, partnering
with local suppliers and focusing on sustainable practices. By partnering with local
suppliers and focusing on sustainable practices, HelloFresh contributes positively to the
communities it serves, reinforcing its image as a responsible corporate citizen. These
evolving relationships reflect HelloFresh's strategic agility and commitment to creating
value for all stakeholders while pursuing its mission of changing the way people eat
forever (HelloFresh SE., 2023).

7.0 SWOT and TOWS Analysis and Conclusion


A SWOT analysis highlights HelloFresh’s internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as
external opportunities and threats (Gurl, 2017). The TOWS matrix then uses this data to
generate strategic alternatives (Weihrich, 1982). Below is a SWOT and TOWS analysis
of HelloFresh.

13
SWOT Analysis of HelloFresh (Bizeau, 2022):

Strengths

 Strong brand recognition


 Diverse meal plan options
 Global presence
 Efficient supply chain management

Weaknesses

 High operational costs


 Dependency on supplier relationships
 Intense competition
 Customer retention challenges

Opportunities

 Expansion into new markets


 Increasing demand for healthy and convenient food options
 Technological advancements in logistics and data analytics

Threats

 Fluctuating food prices


 Regulatory changes
 Potential for supply chain disruptions
 Rising competition from grocery delivery services

14
TOWS Analysis

Table 1: TOWS Matrix of HelloFresh

External OPPORTUNITIES (O) THREATS (T)


Factors
1. Expansion into new 1. Fluctuating food prices
markets 2. Regulatory changes
2. Increasing demand for 3. Potential for supply chain
Internal healthy and convenient disruptions
food options 4. Rising competition from
Factors 3. Technological grocery delivery services
advancements in logistics 5.
and data analytics

1. Strong brand SO Strategies (Maxi-Maxi ST Strategies (Maxi-Mini


recognition Strategy) Strategy)
STRENGTHS (S)

2. Diverse meal plan 1. Utilize strong brand to 1. Leverage efficient supply chain
options expand into emerging to mitigate the impact of
3. Global presence markets fluctuating food prices
4. Efficient supply 2. Capitalize on diverse meal 2. -Use global presence to adapt
chain plans to meet the to regulatory changes across
management increasing demand for different regions
healthy options
1. High operational WO Strategies (Mini-Maxi WT Strategies (Mini-Mini
W

costs Strategy) Strategy)

15
2. Dependency on 1. Address high operational 1. Develop strategies to reduce
supplier costs by exploring new dependency on suppliers to
EAKNESSES (W)

relationships markets with lower avoid supply chain disruptions


3. Intense expenses 2. -Differentiate from rising
competition 2. Improve customer grocery delivery services
4. Customer retention by leveraging through unique meal options
retention technological
challenges advancements

Source: Self-made by the Author

Conclusion

The SWOT and TOWS analyses reveal that HelloFresh has a strong market position
with opportunities for growth, despite facing challenges related to costs, competition,
and supply chain management. The company’s strengths in brand recognition, meal
diversity, and global presence can be leveraged to capitalize on opportunities such as
market expansion and the rising demand for convenient, healthy food options. However,
HelloFresh must also address its weaknesses and prepare for potential threats by
improving operational efficiency, fostering customer loyalty, and enhancing supply chain
resilience. Strategic partnerships and technological innovations will be key to sustaining
HelloFresh’s competitive advantage in the dynamic meal kit delivery market.

16
References

 Aithal, P.S. and Aithal, S., (2023). Stakeholders’ Analysis of the Effect of

Ubiquitous Education Technologies on Higher Education. International Journal of

Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 7(2), pp.102-133.

 Alles, S.T. and Yazdanifard, R., (2017). Strategic Management Failures of" Dialog

Axiata" and Recommended Strategic Approaches for

Implementation. International Journal of Management, Accounting &

Economics, 4(10).

 Birru, A.C., Sudarmiatin, S. and Hermawan, A., (2022). Competitive strategies in

the lodging service sector: Five porter analyses and case study SWOT

analysis. Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(1), pp.001-017.

 Beckmann, A., (2021). Scenario analysis of online food supply chains.

In Adapting to the Future: How Digitalization Shapes Sustainable Logistics and

17
Resilient Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg International

Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 31 (pp. 585-609). Berlin: epubli GmbH.

 Bizeau, D., (2022). COVID-19 and Consumer Eating Patterns: Analysis of The

Impact On The Meal Kit Industry In The United States.

 Bruijl, D., (2018). The relevance of Porter's five forces in today's innovative and

changing business environment.. Available at SSRN 3192207..

 Buye, R., (2021). Critical examination of the PESTEL Analysis Model. Project:

Action Research for Development.

 Cho, M., Bonn, M.A., Moon, S. and Chang, H.S., (2020). Home chef meal kits:

Product attributes, perceived value and repurchasing intentions the moderating

effects of household configuration. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism

Management, 45, pp.192-202.

 Closs, D.J., Speier, C. and Meacham, N., (2011). Sustainability to support end-to-

end value chains: the role of supply chain management. Journal of the Academy

of Marketing Science, 39, pp.101-116.

 Dälken, F., (20140. Are porter’s five competitive forces still applicable? a critical

examination concerning the relevance for today’s business (Bachelor's thesis,

University of Twente).

 Desai, C., (2019). Strategy and strategic management.. In: Management for

Scientists. Emerald Publishing Limited., pp. 65-84.

 Dobbs, M.E., (2014). Guidelines for applying Porter's five forces framework: a set

of industry analysis templates. Competitiveness review, 24(1), pp.32-45.

18
 Echchakoui, S .(2018). An analytical model that links customer-perceived value

and competitive strategies. Journal of Marketing Analytics,, 6(4), pp. 138-149.

 Financial Times. (2021). Why meal kits are more sustainable than supermarket

meals. Available at: [Link]

[Link]

 FoodNavigator-USA. (2021). HelloFresh drives ‘meaningful growth’ with a multi-

brand strategy built through strategic acquisitions. Available at:

[Link]

meaningful-growth-with-a-multi-brand-strategy-built-through-strategic-

acquisitions

 Freeman, R., (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach.. s.l.:

Cambridge university press..

 Gini, K.B. and Agala, H.O., (2023). The Impact of Macro-Environmental Factors

on Business Performance. International Journal of Research and Innovation in

Social Science, 7(11), pp.1837-1843.

 Ghvanidze, S., Velikova, N., Dodd, T.H. and Oldewage-Theron, W., (2016).

Consumers' environmental and ethical consciousness and the use of the related

food products information: The role of perceived consumer

effectiveness. Appetite, 107, pp.311-322.

 Gurl, E., (2017). SWOT analysis: A theoretical review.

 Hayes, K., Reed, N. & Fitzgerald, J., (2010). Who are your lean health

customers?: identifying influential lean customers in health service: current

19
practice and insights from stakeholder analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Health

Management, 5(1), pp. 53-61.

 HelloFresh. (2023). Our Mission. Available at:

[Link]

 HelloFresh Group. (2024). About us | HelloFresh. Available at:

[Link]

 HelloFresh SE. (2023). ESG | HelloFresh SE. Available at:

[Link] HelloFresh. (2020).

Sustainability Report 2020. Available at:

[Link]

%20Reports/HF_Sustainability-Report-2020_EN.pdf

 HelloFresh Group (2022) HelloFresh Non-Financial Report 2022 Available at:

[Link]

%20Reports/ENG_HelloFresh_Non-Financial_Report_2022.pdf

 HelloFresh Group. (2021). Strategy, Expansion & New Product Development

Available at: [Link]

hellofresh-strategy-expansion-and-new-product-development/

 HelloFresh (2020) Sustainability Report 2020. Available at:

[Link]/download/companies/hellofresh/Annual

Reports/HF_Sustainability-Report-2020_EN.pdf

 Henson, S. and Caswell, J., (1999). Food safety regulation: an overview of

contemporary issues. Food policy, 24(6), pp.589-603.

20
 Jepsen, A.L. and Eskerod, P., (2009). Stakeholder analysis in projects:

Challenges in using current guidelines in the real world. International journal of

project management, 27(4), pp.335-343.

 Katte, L.M.V., (2019). HelloFresh: a recipe for sustainable market

leadership? (Doctoral dissertation).

 Kennon, N., Howden, P. and Hartley, M., (2009). Who really matters?: A

stakeholder analysis tool. Extension Farming Systems Journal, 5(2), pp.9-17.

 Khan, S.A. and Sowards, S.K., (2018). It's not just dinner: Meal delivery kits as

food media for food citizens. Frontiers in Communication, 3, p.39.

 Kleindorfer, P.R., Singhal, K. and Van Wassenhove, L.N., (2005). Sustainable

operations management. Production and operations management, 14(4), pp.482-

492.

 New Food Magazine. (2021). How to stay competitive in the meal kit market

Available at: [Link]

with-hellofresh/

 Polonsky, M.J. and Scott, D., (2005). An empirical examination of the stakeholder

strategy matrix. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), pp.1199-1215.

 Quartr. (2024). HelloFresh: Competitive Analysis and Future Outlook for Meal Kits.

Available at: [Link]

analysis-and-future-outlook-for-meal-kits

 Reymond, P., Strande, L., Ronteltap, M. and Brdjanovic, D., (2014). Stakeholder

analysis. Faecal Sludge Management: Systems Approach for Implementation and

Operation, pp.319-340.

21
 Shakhshir, G., (2014). Positioning strategies development. Annals of the University of

Oradea, Economic Science Series, 23(1).

 Sigcha, E., Martinez-Moscoso, A., Siguenza-Guzman, L. and Jadan, D., (2020). PESTEL

analysis as a Baseline to support decision-making in the local textile industry.

In International Conference on Systems and Information Sciences (pp. 144-156). Cham:

Springer International Publishing.

 Statista (2024) HelloFresh - statistics & facts. Available at:

[Link]

 Steenkamp, P., (2007). Fidentia: A strategic and corporate governance

analysis (Doctoral dissertation, University of Stellenbosch).

 Rustam, A., Wang, Y. and Zameer, H., (2020). Environmental awareness, firm

sustainability exposure and green consumption behaviors. Journal of Cleaner

Production, 268, p.122016.

 Villagrasa, J., Sánchez, F. and Donaldson, C., (2023). HOW TO WIND THE

STRATEGIC CLOCK: A BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLE SHOWING THE

DYNAMIC PROCESS THAT UNDERLIES. In INTED2023 Proceedings (pp. 943-

955). IATED.

 Weihrich, H., (1982). The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis. Long

range planning, 15(2), pp.54-66.

 Yannopoulos, P., (2011). Defensive and offensive strategies for market

success. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(13).

22
 Yuan, Y. and Lai, Z., (2023). Brand Loyalty in the Context of Digital Food Retail:

Understanding customer behaviour of meal kit delivery services towards brand

loyalty: a focus on HelloFresh.

 Yüksel, I., (2012). Developing a multi-criteria decision making model for PESTEL

analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(24), p.52.

 Yusuf, Y.Y., Sarhadi, M. and Gunasekaran, A., (1999). Agile manufacturing:: The

drivers, concepts and attributes. International Journal of production

economics, 62(1-2), pp.33-43.

23

You might also like