Impact of Pesticides in Silent Spring
Impact of Pesticides in Silent Spring
com
Silent Spring
• When Written: 1958-1962
INTR
INTRODUCTION
ODUCTION • Where Written: Silver Spring, Maryland
BRIEF BIOGRAPHY OF RACHEL CARSON • When Published: 1962
Rachel Carson was an important figure in modern American • Genre: Environmental Science, Nonfiction
environmentalism, whose work is sometimes credited with • Setting: United States
creating the grassroots movement that led to the • Antagonist: Uncontrolled pesticide spraying
establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). • Point of View: Carson narrates in the first person
She grew up on a farm in Pennsylvania, and then earned a
master’s in zoology from Johns Hopkins University in 1932,
EXTRA CREDIT
while working in research labs to earn money for tuition. When
her father’s sudden death left her without the time or funds Influencing Al Gore. Al Gore, former vice president and major
necessary to continue on to a doctorate, Carson found a job spokesperson for public awareness of climate change, cites
with the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries, later known as the Fish and Rachel Carson’s book as one of the most important reasons
Wildlife Service. While there, she began writing and published that he became involved with environmental interests.
articles in newspapers and magazines. The first books that
earned her fame were written on the topic of marine biology. Undersea Love. Carson’s first job as a copywriter with the U.S.
With their success, she was able to quit her job and focus on Bureau of Fisheries was writing for a short weekly radio
writing full time, and her interests began to shift more toward broadcast entitled “Romance Under the Waters.”
conservation. She began work on Silent Spring, her most lasting
legacy, in 1958, gathering research and soliciting contributions
from major experts. The process of writing the book was PL
PLO
OT SUMMARY
slowed by family issues, and then by sickness when Carson was
In Silent Spring, a book that is often viewed as a landmark work
diagnosed with breast cancer. She died of a heart attack two
of environmental writing, Rachel Carson turns her attentions
years after its publication, in 1964.
to the potentially harmful effects of pesticides on the
environment – particularly those pesticides, including DDT,
HISTORICAL CONTEXT that were being administered via aerial spraying in an attempt
Carson’s decision to report on the dangers of pesticides was a to control insect populations on a massive scale. In many ways,
result of a fire ant eradication program in 1957 in which DDT Silent Spring served as a public warning, gathering expert
mixed with fuel oil was sprayed on private and public land in opinion on the dangers of this increasingly destructive practice.
Long Island. After its publication, Silent Spring inspired a In addition to the actual accounts of contamination that she
grassroots political movement that led to the creation of the describes, Carson’s book also contains an overarching
Environmental Protection Agency in 1970 and a ban on DDT in argument about the proper relationship between man and
1972. nature that contributed to the growth of the “deep ecology”
movement regarding the interconnectedness of all living things
RELATED LITERARY WORKS and systems. After a parable that begins the book by
Silent Spring is part of a tradition of nature writing that has its envisioning a future in which silence reigns over the world
American roots in writers like Henry David Thoreau, author of after pesticides have wrought their ultimate destruction on the
Walden Pond and key figure in the transcendentalist movement, environment, Carson lays out her basic thesis. In an
and John Muir, whose popular written accounts of the interconnected world, she argues, man’s newfound power to
American West and public campaigning were instrumental in change his environment needs to be wielded with extreme
the founding of America’s National Park Service. Her caution if we are to avoid destroying the very systems that
conservationist ideas were prefigured by contemporaries like support us.
Aldo Leopold (A A Sand County Almanac
Almanac, 1948), whose work To begin her project of public education, Carson outlines the
brought public attention to the values of environmentalism. major families of pesticides in use, referring to them as
“biocides” since their effects are actually not specific to insects.
KEY FACTS Having laid out her basic conceptual framework and identified
the chemicals in question, Carson breaks down the effects of
• Full Title: Silent Spring
Related Themes:
Chapter 2 Quotes
The history of life on earth has been a history of Page Number: 6
interaction between living things and their surroundings. To a
Explanation and Analysis
large extent, the physical form and the habits of the earth's
vegetation and its animal life have been molded by the In this quote, Carson drives home the danger associated
environment. Considering the whole span of earthly time, the with this new age of the world, in which mankind suddenly
opposite effect, in which life actually modifies its surroundings, has the power to enact massive changes to the planet's
has been relatively slight. Only within the moment of time environment. By considering the past, from a biological and
represented by the present century has one species, man, historical perspective, Carson provides an appreciation of
acquired significant power to alter the nature of his world. the fact that (sometimes destructive) change is a necessary
and manageable part of life on earth. The environment has
changed before, and life has adapted itself to the new status
Related Characters: Rachel Carson (speaker)
quo in each case, evolving to suit the change in
environment. What makes the current - and impending -
Related Themes:
changes different, Carson warns, is that they are happening
Page Number: 5 on a radically different time scale.
Past changes, which were the result of natural shifts in the
Explanation and Analysis earth's climate, happened at the "deliberate pace of nature,"
Here Carson frames humanity's role in the world according but now they are barreling forward at an "impetuous and
to the planet's long history, and offers an important heedless" pace, thanks to mankind's powerful influence. In
perspective on the newfound power of mankind. For her choice of adjectives to describe humanity, Carson
millennia, she explains, life has been shaped by its implies that mankind is a childish force, immature in its
environment, as diverse species have developed in response appreciation of the age-old earth and its environment. As a
to environmental pressures since the beginning of life on result of man's immature actions, which have robbed the
earth. Now, though, she argues that we are entering into a earth of the time it needs to adapt to change, evolution
new phase in life's relationship to the environment. Because cannot properly function to ensure the survival of life on
humanity has risen so quickly to a position of immense earth.
power, living things - humans, that is - now have a real
impact on the environment, shaping a world that has shaped
life for so long. This new era is what atmospheric chemist
Some would-be architects of our future look toward a time
Paul Crutzen later named the "Anthropocene" - the age of
when it will be possible to alter the human germ plasm by
man, when humanity has begun to change the environment
design. But we may easily be doing so now by inadvertence, for
on a scale equivalent to a geological force. How humanity
many chemicals, like radiation, bring about gene mutations. It is
chooses to wield this force will determine the future of our
ironic to think that man might determine his own future by
species, as well as the future of the environment that
something so seemingly trivial as the choice of an insect spray.
sustains all life on earth, since history and biology show us
that all life is interconnected, each species dependent on
the diverse web of fellow species with which they share the Related Characters: Rachel Carson (speaker)
planet.
Related Themes:
Related Themes:
…idealizes life with only its head out of water, inches above
the limits of toleration of the corruption of its own Page Number: 12
environment...Why should we tolerate a diet of weak poisons, a
Explanation and Analysis
home in insipid surroundings, a circle of acquaintances who are
not quite our enemies, the noise of motors with just enough Carson makes her argument clear - all Americans ought to
relief to prevent insanity? Who would want to live in a world be protected against the poison of pesticides. By invoking
which is just not quite fatal? the Bill of Rights, Carson suggests that this protection is
tantamount to the most fundamental of American
freedoms, a basic expectation of what it means to live in this
Related Characters: Rachel Carson (speaker) country. This argument makes the link between public
health and environmental issues perfectly explicit. At the
Related Themes:
same time, by referencing the Bill of Rights and those
Page Number: 12 forefathers who wrote it, and suggesting that even they -
“despite their considerable wisdom” - were unable to
Explanation and Analysis foresee this day, when the actions of the government would
In this quote, Carson attacks the notion that there can be an poison its own nation, Carson offers a powerful reminder
“acceptable level” of poison in the environment, or in our that the pace of development has outstripped reason and
food. In Carson’s view, choosing a life that is just at the caution. Pesticides, argues Carson, represent a threat so
threshold of fatal poisoning seems absurd. She envisions entirely new that even a few hundred years ago - a relatively
the modern race toward chemical development as a rising short time in all of human history, and a blip in geological
flood, which has left humanity with “only its head out of time - they would have been inconceivable. Surely such an
water,” struggling to survive in an environment where each inconceivable threat deserves due consideration before
interconnected organism is vulnerable to the contamination being deployed, suggests Carson. More testing, at the very
least, is absolutely necessary before pesticides as a large
scale method of insect control can be considered, especially
when it seems very likely that pesticides could harm the hatchery—species that they are more interested in fishing
health of an entire nation. for. Do these sportsmen have the right to exert such
sweeping control over the local ecosystem, killing native
species in favor of those they find more "desirable?"
We are rightly appalled by the genetic effects of radiation;
Furthermore, Carson asks, what are the unintended health
how then, can we be indifferent to the same effect in
consequences - for the other species living in the
chemicals that we disseminate widely in our environment?
ecosystem, but also for the people in the surrounding area -
of dumping pesticide into the water, since the water system
Related Characters: Rachel Carson (speaker) is so entirely interconnected?
Carson portrays this operation as an absurd one, like
Related Themes:
something out of a fairy-tale book. She compares it to
Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, a book full of absurd
Page Number: 37
contradictions and arrogant characters convinced that their
Explanation and Analysis sometimes ruthless actions are justified merely because
Carson begins to make a link that will continue to crop up they satisfy some momentary and arbitrary desire. The fact
throughout the book, comparing the dangers of pesticides that these sportsmen (and the companies and authorities
to the more widely known dangers of radiation and nuclear that cater to them) have the power to craft a lake that
armament. By making this link, Carson sets out her goal of complies to their desires, argues Carson, does not give them
educating the public about a different but equally troubling the right to exert that power in such a potentially dangerous
consequence of man's rapid technological [Link] way.
issue of radiation had wider public support as a public
health issue already, and it offers readers a sense of how
serious the threat might be. Activists had been advocating Chapter 6 Quotes
the position that nuclear disarmament was a responsibility Our attitude toward plants is a singularly narrow one…
of mankind, since radiation poisoning threatened the whole The earth's vegetation is part of a web of life in which there are
world, and Carson wanted to create a similar sense of intimate and essential relations between plants and the earth,
collective responsibility when it came to pesticides. between plants and other plants, between plants and animals.
This link also falls into line with the precautionary principle, Sometimes we have no choice but to disturb these
which suggests that unknown dangers ought to be relationships, but we should do so thoughtfully, with full
thoroughly explored before any action that might set them awareness that what we do may have consequences remote in
off is set in motion. This principle had been part of the public time and place.
dialogue around the unknown effects of radiation poisoning,
and Carson suggests it apply in the case of pesticide Related Characters: Rachel Carson (speaker)
poisoning as well.
Related Themes:
When sportsmen of an area want to 'improve' fishing in a Page Number: 63
reservoir, they prevail on authorities to dump quantities of
poison into it to kill the undesired fish, which are then replaced Explanation and Analysis
with hatchery fish more suited to the sportsmen's taste. The Carson again reminds her reader of the interconnectedness
procedure has a strange, Alice-in-Wonderland quality. of all life, and of the connection between life and its
environment. As she will show in this chapter, affecting any
Related Characters: Rachel Carson (speaker) plant has effects on the other living beings in its ecosystem,
plant and animal alike. She describes the relationships
Related Themes: between these webs of living beings as “intimate and
essential” to give a sense of how closely intertwined these
Page Number: 50 species can be, such that disturbing one has terrible effects
on another. For this reason, human agencies that decide,
Explanation and Analysis
through the use of pesticides, to attack a single species that
Carson examines the practice of sport fishermen who kill has been singled out as a “weed” - for some reason,
"undesired" fish and replace them with fish raised in a
The chemical weed-killers are a bright new toy. They work Page Number: 69
in a spectacular way; they give a giddy sense of power over
Explanation and Analysis
nature to those who wield them, and as for the long-range and
less obvious effects— these are easily brushed aside as the In this quote, Carson asks her readers to consider the true
baseless imaginings of pessimists. The 'agricultural engineers' cost of pesticides, beyond the simply monetary price of the
speak blithely of 'chemical plowing' in a world that is urged to chemicals. This question of “true cost” continues to be an
beat its plowshares into spray guns. important aspect of environmental economics, which makes
the claim that pollution and other environmental harms are
not properly considered in determining the price of a given
Related Characters: Rachel Carson (speaker)
action - since, on the one hand, these damages are difficult
to forecast, and on the other, they are harder to quantify
Related Themes:
with a dollar number.
Page Number: 68 As Carson points out, the danger is that because the cost of
chemicals alone is an easy number to conceive, the town
Explanation and Analysis councils and farmers who are responsible for making the
In this quote, Carson criticizes the pesticide makers' blind decision to use pesticides in their community might be
faith in the power of their technology to solve what they see fooled into believing they are saving money by using
as the world's problems. As she has in the past, Carson uses chemicals, when in fact they are creating a debt that must
language that casts these 'engineers' as childish, comparing be paid later - in clean up bills, crop loss, medical costs, and
their pesticides to a "bright new toy." In an era where man even repeated sprayings, since pesticides seem to be an
has the power to influence nature on a wide scale, these ineffective method of long-term control. In addition to these
engineers are, in Carson's view, drunk on power, "giddy" hard-to-forecast economic costs, one most consider the
with the sense of control that they have - even if this control loss of beauty, the potential loss of tourism that results, and
is an illusion. - in Carson’s appeal to small town American nostalgia - the
Any criticism of the power-plays of these engineers is loss of a way of life, as birds and fish die off.
brushed aside, since criticisms are based often in effects
that are long term or difficult to observe - which is why
Carson has written this book to catalogue those effects, and To the author of this paper, many of us would
educate the public, convincing them that precaution in the unquestionably be suspect, convicted of some deep
face of the unknown is the only morally acceptable position. perversion of character because we prefer the sight of the
She twists an old image from the Bible, of an idealized, vetch and the clover and the wood lily in all their delicate and
peaceful future in which men will "beat their swords into transient beauty to that of roadsides scorched as by fire, the
plowshares," to emphasize that these pesticides are not shrubs brown and brittle, the bracken that once lifted high its
tools of agriculture, but rather, in her view, weapons of war. proud lacework now withered and drooping. We would seem
She sees the childish actions of the engineers as having deplorably weak that we can tolerate the sight of such 'weeds',
unleashed a war against nature that will ultimately lead to that we do not rejoice in their eradication, that we are not filled
man's destruction. with exultation that man has once more triumphed over
miscreant nature.
Related Characters: Rachel Carson (speaker) and however they see fit. It is this philosophy, that the
sprayers know best, which her book sets out to argue
Related Themes: against. She uses language that casts the strategy of the
pesticide users as a war against nature, careful to refer to
Page Number: 72 their tools as spray guns, their chemicals as a rain of poison,
and their actions as a crusade against which "no one must
Explanation and Analysis
protest."
In this quote, Carson defends the right of people to feel a
Because all life is interconnected, the casualties of this war
sentimental attachment to the beauty of nature, objecting
are many, but the sprayers refuse to consider these losses,
to its destruction on moral and aesthetic grounds. She has
obsessed instead with maximizing profits via the
just finished describing a stretch of road with abundant
destruction of certain insects or weeds. Carson's implied
greenery on either side, that was sprayed to prevent the
question is: where did these sprayers gain their
spread of weeds - a choice that, to her mind, destroyed its
unquestionable authority? Who is responsible for their
natural beauty in the name of a false notion of control of
choices? When did the need to prioritize killing insects
nature with no real benefit. She describes the roadside
become so great as to obscure all other considerations?
before and after spraying with an emphasis on the contrast
between the “delicate and transient beauty” of plant life to
the depressing desolation of “withered and drooping” plants
whose “proud lacework” has been destroyed. The image of
lace urges the reader to consider the plants as something Chapter 8 Quotes
delicate and beautiful, crafted carefully over a long period of Over increasingly large areas of the United States, spring
time and then thoughtlessly ruined. now comes unheralded by the return of the birds, and the early
Carson strongly condemns the decision to destroy these mornings are strangely silent where once they were filled with
plants, and mocks those who would consider her, and others the beauty of bird song. This sudden silencing of the song of
who feel the same way that she does, as “deplorably weak” birds, this obliteration of the color and beauty and interest they
for mourning the loss of their beauty. She refuses to join the lend to our world have come about swiftly, insidiously, and
ranks of those who rejoice in this destruction, and seems to unnoticed by those whose communities are as yet unaffected.
presume that her reader will agree. She sarcastically
undercuts this triumph of man over “miscreant nature” by
Related Characters: Rachel Carson (speaker)
showcasing the arbitrariness of what is classed as a “weed,”
and the brutality of the methods of control that take out Related Themes:
vulnerable, helpless - and harmless - plants without
discriminating between good and bad.
Related Symbols:
Under the philosophy that now seems to guide our Page Number: 103
destinies, nothing must get in the way of the man with the
Explanation and Analysis
spray gun. The incidental victims of his crusade against insects
count as nothing; if robins, pheasants, raccoons, cats, or even In this quote, Carson considers one of her chief examples of
livestock happen to inhabit the same bit of earth as the target mankind's destructive influence: the erasure of native
insects and to be hit by the rain of insect-killing poisons no one American birds from the landscape. She makes use of a key
must protest. symbol in this book, silence, to spur the reader's concern for
a future without birdsong, an image that evokes the loss of a
pure joy that many may take for granted until it is too late;
Related Characters: Rachel Carson (speaker) this is a description of the titular "Silent Spring." As usual,
Carson selects words designed to maximize the effect of
Related Themes:
her warning - she describes an "obliteration" of "color and
beauty and interest" that is sneaking "insidiously" across the
Page Number: 85
nation, casting birds as the beautiful, innocent victims of an
Explanation and Analysis invisible, malignant threat.
Here Carson addresses the seeming impunity of pesticide Carson makes it clear here that her mission is to present the
users, who have been given the authority to spray wherever
Chapter 15 Quotes
developing the theory of natural selection, and forecasts the
By their very nature chemical controls are self-defeating, disastrous consequences of the adaptive ability of insects
for they have been devised and applied without taking into for human society. As she has shown elsewhere, killing off
account the complex biological systems against which they insects with pesticides only serves to encourage the
have been blindly hurled. development of resistance to the chemicals used in
widespread sprayings, leading to ever stronger and more
Related Characters: Rachel Carson (speaker) resistant insect populations poised to adversely affect crops
and human health.
Related Themes: This development of resistance makes sense according to
Darwin's theory that the fittest members of a species will
Page Number: 246 survive catastrophe or environmental pressure, passing on
Explanation and Analysis their traits to the next generation to improve the species.
This means that, ironically, the more intensive the spraying
This quote makes clear what is, if not the strongest angle of
becomes, the stronger the insects themselves become.
Carson’s argument against pesticides, certainly the most
Carson argues that this is not only an ineffective strategy,
frustrating: they don’t even work as they claim to! The
but a dangerous one, since it leads to the development of
supposed efficiency and effectiveness of pesticides for
increasingly deadly chemicals and increasingly hardy insect
destroying the ‘threat’ of insects is in large part unproven,
populations at the same time.
and, if anything, Carson shows that they are often both
costly and ineffective, leading to greater resistance in insect
populations and destruction of the very crops they were
Chapter 17 Quotes
meant to protect. This lack of effect drives home the fact
that man’s presumption that he can control every aspect of We stand now where two roads diverge. But unlike the
his environment by intervening with simple fixes is arrogant roads in Robert Frost's familiar poem, they are not equally fair.
and immature. Ecosystems are much more complex than The road we have long been traveling is deceptively easy, a
these agricultural engineers could have foreseen, operating smooth superhighway on which we progress with great speed,
in a series of interconnecting and interdependent webs, but at its end lies disaster. The other fork of the road— the one
such that the engineers’ drastic chemical methods not only 'less traveled by'— offers our last, our only chance to reach a
carry risks for every member of the environment, but also destination that assures the preservation of our earth.
fail to perform the job for which they were intended.
Related Characters: Rachel Carson (speaker), Robert Frost
Suddenly, a ‘strange blight’ strikes the area, leaving a swathe of This blight has the quality of a fairy-tale villain, slowly poisoning the
sickness and death in its wake. Inexplicable illnesses, among perfect natural setting of the town. Its silence becomes a symbol of
both adults and children, puzzle the town’s doctors. An eerie the dark future without nature that Carson argues pesticides will
silence reigns, as birds are found everywhere dead or dying, create.
trembling violently.
Farm animals fail to reproduce successfully, or their young Here, Carson demonstrates the links that bind each part of the town
survive only a few days. Apple trees bloom, but without bees to and its environment, and shows that the consequences when one
pollinate them there will be no fruit. The lush roadside part is affected quickly spread throughout the community. These
vegetation withers, and streams are emptied and lifeless, so non-specific images will be replaced with real-life examples in the
that no anglers come to visit. coming chapters.
In patches leftover on rooftops lies the culprit; a fine white This serves as the ‘moral’ of the fable that opens the book. The fairy-
powder. Carson warns that the people of this imaginary town tale villain is none other than humans ourselves, or at least the
are themselves responsible for its destruction. “A grim specter”, poisons that we—humans—have created. Carson is urging us to take
she writes, has crept upon us to silence the voices of spring, responsibility for becoming educated about the dangers of the
and her book will attempt to unmask it. pesticides we make and use.
One of the scariest aspects of this pollution is the speed with Rather than following the example of nature, Carson sees man as
which it has taken hold. Although there are naturally occurring sprinting ahead at an unsustainable pace – her critics would cite
dangers from small amounts of radiation or chemical exposure, this as an example of her ‘anti-development’ tendencies. In fact,
life has created a careful and resilient balance over the course Carson encourages development but urges caution, and a respect
of millennia in defense against them. The “heedless pace of for the methods of nature, which have been ‘developed’ over
man” in developing new poisons means that natural selection is millennia. The fragility of this age-old balance in the face of man’s
not given the chance to develop these defenses. Many of the new power is also frightening.
changes Carson describes have taken place over just the
previous twenty-five years – which is a mere moment in
geological time.
This “heedless pace” is truly astounding: 500 new synthetic The recklessness of chemical development is, for Carson, a sign of
chemicals are introduced in the U.S. alone each year. This humanity’s arrogance in this new, fast-paced age. Instead of living in
includes those used in “man’s war against nature,” the harmony with nature, humans have chosen to take up arms against
insecticides designed to combat the perceived pests. Carson it. By calling pesticides “biocides,” Carson makes two points: 1) that
refers to these pesticides with her own term, “biocides,” or ‘life- these poisons are not just targeted to “pests”—they kill all sorts of
killers,’ making the case that the destruction they cause is by no living things; 2) that with these biocides we have begun a war
means limited to the insect world. She argues that this combat against life itself, a war whose effects will be felt by humans in
against nature creates a useless spiral of violence, destroying unexpected ways. Because life is an interconnected system, it is
many species that were not the initial target of pesticide impossible to target only the ‘pests’ that humanity wishes to
spraying and spreading chemicals that accumulate dangerously destroy.
in organic tissues.
We are told by their supporters that these pesticides are This statistic on overproduction is part of Carson’s goal for the book:
necessary for farm production, but in fact there is a problem of to educate the public, speaking directly to citizens and providing a
food overproduction: each year the U.S. pays one billion dollars different perspective from the one commonly taken by politicians
to subsidize the surplus-food storage program. This disconnect and proponents of the chemical industry, which tends to exaggerate
between reality and the language used by politicians or people the pest problem, which in turn helps them sell more pesticides.
in the industry is typical of the logic of urgency that many
lawmakers use to justify insecticide use whenever there is a
pest problem that they view as a ‘crisis.’
There may be an insect problem, but our notion of it is out of Carson admits that pests can pose real problems, but here she
proportion with reality. Insects do in fact trouble humans if speaks to another frustration – that other, less destructive methods
they carry disease in crowded areas or interfere with the food of control are not considered, although chemical methods are often
supply, but chemical methods of control have often backfired, both dangerous and ineffective.
causing wide harm and failing to eradicate the pests in
question.
Non-native insect species introduced to new regions by By explaining the ways that invasive species can become
accident pose another issue in insect control. Most often, these entrenched in a new environment, Carson is again demonstrating
insects hitchhiked to the new area on imported plant species. the important relations between species that exist in nature. She
When they arrive, they enter an ecosystem without the wants to educate her readers about the realities of the pest issue,
predators or parasites that normally keep them in check, and while introducing an understanding that pesticides only worsen a
their populations can balloon rapidly. Quarantine and problem that could be solved by natural means, which she will
pesticides campaigns against such pests are expensive and discuss in later chapters.
ineffective. Invasive species are better dealt with by other
means.
Paul Shepard, an American environmentalist thinker, writes of Here, Carson presses a few of her key themes. First, she offers a
life “with only its head out of the water,” barely clutching on to vision of the present and future that is cramped, desperate, and
survival conditions. Although no one would seem to desire this precarious – an exercise in survival – in contrast to a past lived fully
sort of life, it is pressed upon us by the “ruthless power” of at peace with nature. On behalf of the concerned public, she then
regulators in state and federal agencies who are enamored by questions the regulators responsible for creating these conditions,
pesticides. It is almost unbelievable that they should have the and urges caution and a return to the past.
right to pollute on behalf of the whole population, which has no
say in the matter.
In addition to the problem of regulation of pesticides, there is a Carson’s insistence on the value of research before undertaking
lack of research into the negative consequences of these massive aerial pesticide spraying is echoed in modern
materials. Industry officials dominate discussion of the topic, environmentalism’s support for the “precautionary principle,”
silencing protests that urge caution and issuing false according to which if the potential dangers of a new invention are
assurances of safety. The public must actively demand to know unknown, it should not be put into the world until more testing has
the facts about pesticide use before continuing down its taken place. Carson places the responsibility for enforcing this
current path of action. principle on the public.
Modern insecticides are deadlier still. There are the Whereas arsenic occurs naturally in small doses, these new
chlorinated hydrocarbons, including DDT, and the organic pesticides are a creation of man – and man has outdone himself,
phosphorus insecticides, including malathion and parathion. manufacturing a range of deadly poisons. On the one hand, Carson
They are organic, built from carbon atoms within methane seems to celebrate the ingenuity of modern science, but she also
molecules that have been altered in small but significant ways. underlines the unpredictable nature of the changes created by small
Normally, for example, methane is composed of one carbon alterations in the molecular make-up of these chemicals.
atom and four hydrogen atoms, but scientists have discovered
that substituting chlorine for one of the hydrogen atoms
creates methyl chloride.
DDT is often thought of as harmless, because it was used in DDT would become a focus of Carson’s followers, who eventually
powder form to combat lice during WWII - however, in liquid succeeded in getting it banned in 1972. Carson’s focus on the issue
form it is much more toxic, and can accumulate in the body over of accumulation—in which repeated exposures at a ‘safe’ level build
time. Scientists disagree about what level of accumulation is up within the body to produce unsafe levels of exposure – highlights
tolerable, but studies have shown that a majority of people how little we know about the behavior of the chemicals we are using
carry unsafe levels stored in their bodies’ fat cells and vital in the real world. Her attitude of cautious skepticism is in line with
organs, where it can build up over time. DDT in fat cells is then the precautionary principle.
released over time with exertion, leading to chronic poisoning.
The chemical is transmitted through the food chain, and even The idea that DDT and other toxins can be passed across the ‘germ
from mother to child. If a crop of alfalfa is dusted with DDT, and line,’ which is to say, from generation to generation, raises a new set
then chickens are fed with infected alfalfa, their eggs have been of moral questions. We are not only poisoning ourselves, but also
shown to contain DDT afterwards. The same mechanism of transferring mutations and toxins to the next generation, who bear
transference has been found to function in human mothers no responsibility for their creation.
who transmit DDT through the placenta during pregnancy or in
their breast milk.
Chlordane, Heptachlor, Dieldrin, and Aldrin are other By listing the types of pesticide, Carson underlines their variety and
pesticides in the same family (chlorinated hydrocarbons) as how widespread they are. This anecdote of the poisoned sprayers is
DDT, and each is widely used in aerial spraying of crops. Each particularly evocative; the workers, in their attempt to use the
also builds up through food chains and over time, and is many sprays against the mosquitoes, wind up injuring themselves. This
times more toxic than DDT, with evidence of seizures, sterility mirrors what Carson believes to be happening on a larger scale:
and death resulting from exposure. In one instance, a group of humans, in their war against the pests, are poisoning themselves –
pesticide sprayers working against malarial mosquitoes perhaps fatally.
substituted Dieldrin for their usual DDT and exposure to the
chemical led to seizures and death among the sprayers
themselves.
Organic phosphates, the second group of pesticides, have their The fact that the development of many pesticides came as a result
origins in German labs, where they were discovered by a of weapons research during World War II further supports Carson’s
chemist named Gerhard Schrader and then weaponized during idea of a ‘war against nature,’ and in reminding her readers of this
WWII as nerve gas. They attack the nervous system, destroying fact Carson also underlines the strangeness of this former weapon
enzymes that are vital to the proper transmission of impulses being used as though it were completely harmless, highlighting its
from nerve to nerve. Without this enzyme, an excess of dangerous effects on the nervous system.
transmitters builds up, causing convulsions and death.
An enzyme in the body naturally protects against the effects of This point reinforces the idea that pesticides cannot be thought of in
organic phosphates, but repeated exposure in small doses can terms of individual exposures. The natural defenses of the body are
wear this defensive measure away. Instances of parathion part of that ecological balance developed over millennia that
poisoning are increasing in the U.S., and although they are less Carson has described, and their disruption has unexpected
persistent than other pesticides, organic phosphates’ effects consequences.
can be extreme.
Malathion, another organic phosphate widely used in home Another warning that, although individual chemicals can be tested
gardening, demonstrates another important principle about in isolation, the ways that they will interact in the environment – or
synthetic chemicals: in combination they can react together in even within the body itself – are much more difficult to predict. This
unexpected ways to inhibit natural defenses and become much basic unpredictability is a major reason to follow the precautionary
deadlier. Further, these combinations can happen inside the principle.
body from separate exposures that happen over time, since
chemicals build up in the body’s tissues.
Systemic insecticides are used to make plants poisonous to the As with her earlier reference to the Borgias, when Carson here
pests that eat them. Carson compares them to the mythical compares systemic insecticides to Medea’s deadly dress she is
dress that Medea, of ancient Greek mythology, gave to a rival, drawing upon a common cultural well of knowledge about poisons.
which when worn caused a violent death. These ‘built-in’ By associating pesticides with this tradition she is challenging their
insecticides make all of the tissues of a plant or animal toxic to perception as simple, harmless, helpful sprays.
the insects that prey on them, but this toxicity can also be
transferred in uncontrollable ways to living beings other than
the targeted pests.
Insecticides are being applied directly to water systems, or The water system is a particularly good example of the ways in
indirectly via aerial spraying that then becomes mixed in with which nature is an interconnected system; it is impossible to treat
agricultural runoff water, making these systems toxic to fish. water ‘selectively,’ since any contamination spreads throughout the
Further, discoveries of DDT traces in fish upstream of environment. Most often, water is not sprayed purposefully – but
contamination or spraying sites suggest that once these chemicals find a way to contaminate it nonetheless, beyond the
chemicals get into the groundwater that the groundwater control of humans.
transfers the chemicals all throughout the system. This means
that all water is threatened by contamination anywhere.
Chemicals from agricultural runoff have been found to This situation, in which dangers are unknown, massive, and
contaminate drinking water even after the runoff has passed insufficiently researched, requires that the public exercise caution
through water purification plants. Chemists have little and slow down the rapid spread of chemicals according to the
understanding of what chemical combinations might be precautionary principle.
reaching the public, how to test for them, or what their effects
might be.
Carson recounts the story of a farming district in Colorado Here is a concrete example of the sort of environmental changes
contaminated by chemicals that had leached into the water undergone by chemicals that Carson has been hinting at – the
table from the Rocky Mountain Arsenal—a factory that unaided formation of 2,4-D is a sign that poisonous substances can
produces pesticides—located several miles away. Over seven or result from these interactions. The time since contamination – eight
eight years, these chemicals had traveled through the years – demonstrates that the effects of spillage or leaching can be
groundwater to pollute local wells. Most alarmingly, wells long term, making them very difficult to detect.
tested positive for a synthetic chemical called 2,4-D, a weed
killer that had apparently formed spontaneously in when
certain chemicals combined, independent of human oversight.
In Clear Lake, California, fishermen chose to dose ‘gnat- Carson emphasizes that the gnat was not a dangerous pest – merely
infested’ waters with DDD, even though the gnats were not an annoyance. When the fishermen decided (recklessly, or
especially harmful. Despite ‘careful planning’, the operation had arrogantly, as Carson would see it), to exert their control over the
to be repeated, and the following winter revealed that other natural world, their efforts backfired, as bioaccumulation led to the
species had been affected. The western grebe, a bird of poisoning of the western grebe. The fact that this contamination
“spectacular appearance,” died out completely in the area, was initially undetectable should inspire caution in a reader, who
having eaten fish that had in turn eaten infected gnats and may have been assured of the harmlessness of pesticides in the
plankton, again accumulating increasingly concentrated doses past.
of the chemical. Because the chemicals had passed from the
lake into the tissues of its inhabitants, initial tests of the water
had suggested that it was safe.
Carson questions the wisdom of using substances with such Carson concludes the chapter by returning to the dangers posed to
strong biological effects that can impact the drinking supply. Dr. humans by contaminated drinking water, with the new awareness
Hueper has warned that cancer hazards in public drinking of the interconnected nature of the water system and its
water are increasing, and there is evidence to support his claim. inhabitants to support her suggestion that current practices are
The complex, interconnected nature of the water system, foolish.
especially, supports Carson’s claim that “in nature nothing
exists alone.”
This problem has been largely ignored, by control agencies and Although the soil may not be a glamorous and well-researched
scientists alike. Some pesticides have been shown to disrupt topic, its function is fundamental to plant growth. Because it is
nitrification, an important process that produces nitrogen in difficult to know, fully, the ways that an ecological system functions,
the soil. Pesticides can also disrupt natural predator-prey injecting pesticides into the process can have unexpected results,
checks and balances and lead to the flourishing or destruction even results that favor the targeted pest. This fact supports the idea
of different organisms – sometimes the very pests that that man is out of his element in attempting to exert an artificial
insecticides were meant to control. When larger insects, like control over nature. The effects of accumulation in the soil also
praying mantises, for example, are destroyed, the insects that demonstrate this seeming inability of man to think ahead before
were their natural prey can reproduce unchecked. Most poisoning his environment.
alarmingly, these chemicals have been shown to persist in the
soil for years, accumulating over multiple single applications of
‘safe’ dosages to eventually reach dangerously high levels.
Arsenic in tobacco fields provides one example. Even though This is a prime example of the long-term effects of pesticide use.
arsenic has been replaced by synthetic insecticides in the Although they are marketed as a quick, harmless, one-time fix,
production of tobacco, the arsenic content of American-grown Carson has shown that in fact they persist in the environment, often
tobacco increased 300-600% from 1932-52. This is because require multiple applications, and can affect health over decades of
residues from previous episodes of arsenic spraying in the soil accumulation. Our environments have already been changed, in
are breaking down into a form that dissolves into water and is ways that no one could have predicted.
then absorbed into the plants.
This introduces the issue of plants absorbing pesticides into This anecdote is significant because it shows farmers – or in this
their tissue through the soil. Hop growers in Washington and case, hop growers – who are often seen as the biggest supporters of
Idaho were advised to use a pesticide called heptachlor to treat pesticide use, being negatively affected by unpredictable effects of
the soil against a pest called the strawberry root weevil, but these chemicals, even after having followed instructions from the
vines planted after treatment withered and died. Even after the authorities. We may think we have mastered these substances,
area had been replanted, the poison persisted in the soil and suggests Carson, but in fact there function is beyond our
was absorbed by plants. Different plant species also absorb understanding – caution is required.
these poisons in the soil at different rates, although research in
this area is minimal. Clearly, little is known, and the danger is
potentially enormous.
The attempted eradication of the sagebrush from the West is a This is another illustration of the interconnected web of species and
perfect case study. The sage is a result of long ages of environment that scientists refer to as ‘ecology.’ It also recalls the
experimentation by nature, and is perfectly adapted to its radical difference in the speed of man’s development, which is fast
unique, harsh environment at the edge of the Rocky and furious, and nature’s, which is slow and careful. When one
Mountains. It lives in concert with other creatures in its approaches the other, the fragile natural balance is disrupted.
environment, like the sage grouse, a bird that, during mating
season, loosens the soil beneath and around the sage so that
grass can grow.
When farmers decided to clear away the sage with pesticides And here Carson demonstrates that disruption. Carson shows the
to create more grazing land, the other organisms that had ways in which violence against the sagebrush ended up harming the
grown up alongside it, including the sage grouse, the pronghorn entire ecosystem, while the humans behind the plan failed to
antelope, and sheep, for which sagebrush was an important achieve their goal – in fact, their aims were also actively harmed by
grazing material in its own right, immediately suffered. The the eradication of the sagebrush, which turns out to play a key role
grass that the sage had sheltered also disappeared, crippling for grazing.
the farmers’ plans. Further, without sage there was nothing for
livestock and wild grazers to eat during the harsh winters.
Another case comes from Supreme Court Justice and Carson’s citation of William O. Douglas gives her claims about the
environmental writer William O. Douglas, who tells the tale of sagebrush new legitimacy from a prominent witness. His account is
herbicide sprayings in Bridger National Forest in order to try to tinged with the nostalgic tone that Carson often adopts when
eliminate the sage. Untargeted spraying for sage also killed the remembering the past of a place, before pesticides disrupted the
willows, which had been home to the rare and wonderful balance and led to the destruction of what had been treasured by
moose, and disrupted beaver communities. Without the beaver many.
dams, a beautiful trout lake at the end of the stream drained
away, and this natural jewel and popular destination was lost.
Carson argues that weed-killers are tempting toys that appeal Here, Carson continues to ridicule the idea that man can control
to those who want the spectacular illusion of power over nature without creating negative consequences, villainizing the
nature and can believe in a ‘cheap’ alternative to mowing sprayers of roadside weeds who have taken it upon themselves to
without considering true costs. One of these costs is in tourist destroy a portion of the forest with aesthetic value for many people,
goodwill, after beautiful roadside vegetation has been in addition to its ecological importance. The public seems united
destroyed by the indiscriminate spraying of intolerant or against these ‘sprayers,’ in Carson’s vision, and need only speak up
careless weed sprayers, who view any brush at all as for itself in a unified way.
undesirable. In Maine, Connecticut, and Massachusetts there
has been public outcry after spraying devastated natural
undergrowth.
Beyond aesthetic considerations, there are practical reasons In her role as defender of the natural world, Carson returns to the
not to destroy so-called weeds. They provide the habitat for practical and lists the ways in which blanket spraying is less
pollinating bees and other essential insect life, as well as animal effective, more destructive, and ultimately more expensive than
life. Blanket spraying, in which whole areas are covered with a targeted spraying. The merits of targeted spraying stem from its
shower of untargeted pesticides often must be repeated when understanding of the ecology of roadside vegetation, and Carson
weeds return. Other methods, like smarter, selective spraying believes that the public, when educated, will be smart enough to see
that only attacks unwanted, tall weeds, make use of the natural that these options are preferable. It is Carson’s explicit goal to
ability of persistent shrub cover to ward off the growth of taller provide this education.
weeds, and are therefore more effective and less disruptive. If
taxpayers understood the inefficiency and danger of blanket
spraying they would demand a change.
Herbicides like 2,4-D also have negative effects on livestock Carson uses the background she has already provided about the
and wildlife that are not well understood. The herbicides ability of insecticides to alter fundamental functions of an
accumulate in the soil, and can change a plant’s metabolism so ecosystem, extending her argument to the related world of
that it produces more sugar and becomes more attractive to herbicides. The example of the infected plant seems particularly
livestock – who can then be adversely affected (or killed) by alien and unexpected, underlining how little is known about the
eating the infected plant, which they might normally avoid. unintended consequences of these chemicals
Moreover, the positive effects that certain ‘weeds’ have on the Just because a certain plant is an annoyance to humanity, for
soil are underappreciated – we must remember that soil whatever reason, does not mean that it serves no beneficial purpose
processes exist within a system in which many players for its neighbors. The anecdote from Holland is a perfect example o
participate. In Holland, marigolds that were planted among the ways that natural controls, like the marigold, can be used in
dying roses helped to control the spread of harmful nematode place of herbicides. By increasing the diversity of flower beds, we
worms, a solution that has now been replicated elsewhere. By would be moving away from an engineered, human-controlled state
spraying without considering the many interdependencies at back toward nature.
work in ecosystems, humans are changing the nature of wild
habitats in unknown and long-lasting ways.
Other intelligent, cheap, natural strategies for ‘weed’ control In California, as we will see later, natural methods have been
exist, including the importation of natural predators to control adopted with great success that could be replicated elsewhere.
invasive species. Klamath weed, an incredibly fast-spreading These methods take advantage of pre-existing predators, imported
invasive species in the American West, was controlled by an from an invasive species’ native zone to reintroduce a natural check
imported beetle. In a similar fashion, rampant populations of that had been missing in the environment, naturally controlling the
imported prickly pear in Australia were reigned in by an pest population.
Argentine moth. These alternatives are far preferable, argues
Carson, to the destruction caused by herbicides.
The case of the Japanese beetle in the Midwest provides a By highlighting the fact that the Japanese beetle had been
basis for Carson’s arguments against pesticide spraying. In controlled effectively by non-chemical methods in the Northeast,
Michigan, in 1959, 27,000 acres of land were dusted with the Carson emphasizes that this destructive insecticide-focused
pesticide aldrin, even though little need was shown for such method is not necessary, as some lawmakers claim. Unthinking
measures. Despite reasonable control of the invasive beetles in reliance on the chemical option seems to be the only explanation for
the northeast without excessive spraying, Midwestern pest choosing one of the most toxic poisons to begin the program, simply
control agencies have taken a dramatic, pesticide-based because it is least expensive. Who is responsible for this choice?
approach in light of recent encroachments of the beetle on
their states. The highly toxic aldrin was chosen as the least
expensive poison, and citizens were told not to worry about any
dangers.
In Sheldon, Illinois, repeated heavy spraying – despite The problem of limited funding for research is one that Carson will
eyewitness reports of its devastating consequences – led to continue to raise. This is what she means when she describes man’s
massive losses in wild and domestic animal life. Even so, pace as “heedless.” All efforts to limit the power of the chemical
officials rejected the proposed legal limitations that would have industry are rejected, and so caution is thrown to the wind in spite
required prior consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife of accounts that should raise serious questions.
Service before spraying, and the research budget for the
project was tiny – $1100 for two years of study.
As a result of the aerial spraying in Sheldon, which at one point Here again the relatively tiny budget for research is placed in
used Dieldrin – a toxin that had been shown to be fifty times contrast with the seemingly widespread destruction caused by
more poisonous than DDT – at an intensive rate of three pesticide spraying, much of which is a result of bioaccumulation
pounds per acre, birds fed on poisoned worms and beetles, and that passes toxins up the food chain, as discussed in previous
were killed or rendered sterile. Many small mammals in the chapters. This is further evidence of the interconnectedness of
area suffered similarly tragic fates. Still, spraying continued and nature and the need for caution, rather than the arrogance of an
more toxic poisons were used. Over eight years, the budget for attempt for total control through artificial methods.
chemical pest control was over $375,000, but researchers
looking into the impact of the program were only allocated
$6,000.
Frustratingly, efforts to control the Japanese beetles by more Carson reinforces her argument that the only reason behind
natural means had already succeeded in the northeast. selecting pesticides over more effective, less expensive, and less
Predators and parasites that target the beetle specifically were destructive natural controls is some sort of financial interest. The
imported from the Far East and proved very effective, and also groups that benefit from the production of synthetic chemicals also
revealed the beetle’s vulnerability to ‘milky spore disease’, benefit from the false sense of crisis that justifies their use, and have
which could then be spread artificially to control populations. no incentive to consider other, more natural means, even when they
The use of pesticides to control the beetle in the Midwest was have been proven effective, as in the case of ‘milky spore disease’
therefore justified only because of a sense of crisis that was with the Japanese beetle. The public needs to push back against the
fundamentally false. In reality, the problem had been controlled dominance of this industry.
with better strategies elsewhere, and only the modern trend
toward immediate results supported pesticides over these
methods. Moreover, the chemical solution is inevitably
temporary, allowing the industry to win contracts for spraying
year after year.
This war against nature being waged by chemical Returning to moral issues, Carson challenges the public very openly.
manufacturers begs the question: how long can we destroy the Now that she has provided the information, and ignorance is no
world around us without “losing the right to be called civilized” longer an excuse, we are all guilty of the violence being perpetrated
on the one hand and eventually destroying ourselves on the against the natural world – unless we do something to stop it. What
other? In the often very painful animal deaths described by future do we want for ourselves, and our planet?
local witnesses, does not some part of our dignity as human
beings also die?
As a symbol of this destruction, she chooses the robin, a bird The robin is chosen partly because it is well-known and loved –
whose return normally heralds the end of winter. Its springtime Carson hopes to inspire action on its behalf, and on behalf of the
arrival is no longer guaranteed, however, as widespread previous time in which its return was as regular as the changing of
spraying against the beetle flies that carry a fungus that causes the seasons. This regularity is threatened in the new world created
Dutch elm disease in elm trees has decimated robin by man.
populations.
John Mehner, a graduate student at MSU, demonstrated the The careful work of biologists across the country and around the
causal link between spraying for Dutch elm disease and robin world is a key part of Carson’s book, and she celebrates their work
population drops after studying robins on the MSU campus as by giving it a wider platform. The story of the elms is similar to what
part of his dissertation. Sterility and death resulted from we have seen before; bioaccumulation allows toxins to pass up the
spraying, after robins ate earthworms that had ingested the food chain. The importance of sterility in causing population decline
poison when sprayed leaves fell in the autumn and decayed into is re-emphasized here. The rapidity of decline is particularly
a mulch – another example of bioaccumulation, in which troubling, since this is only one window into a problem that spans
poisons grow more concentrated as they move up the food the country.
chain. After spraying, Mehner found that robin populations had
dropped from 370 to a mere two dozen adult birds, and no
fledglings at all were found.
Similar studies showed that 86-88% of robins had died, while The language Carson uses to describe these suffering or
the birds’ reproductive organs were found to contain disappearing species of birds celebrates their beauty in lyrical
dangerous levels of DDT. This wave of deaths reached other phrases, remembering a glorious past and envisioning a future
species as well, affecting a whole chain of animals for which without these beauties. Further, the sacrifice of these many-colored
earthworms are a major element of their diet. Carson includes creatures is purposeless: because the pesticides end up killing the
an extensive list of these birds and their qualities, those whose birds, which are the natural predators of the insects that were the
“wings are touched with flame” or who are “ruby-crowned.” She intended target of the spraying, the insects end up thriving while the
notes also that with the death of their natural birds are destroyed! Insects can find a new foothold in an empty
predators—birds—insects begin to thrive, often reversing the environment far more quickly than birds can.
desired effects of spraying so that the whole exercise becomes
a futile one.
The eagle, an important American symbol, is also in danger of By focusing on the eagle, Carson finds a means of relating the
extinction. Multiple observers show a decrease in young eagles abstract dangers of pesticide use to a specific, much beloved symbol
and failures in egg-laying – data from Hawk Mountain, a bird of American patriotism. The work of on-the-ground naturalists like
sanctuary, and from Charles Broley on the western coast of Broley provides the basis for her arguments about their population
Florida, a popular eagle nesting ground, is particularly dire. In decline – this research exists not because anyone from the chemical
1947, when he began his survey, Broley found and banded 150 industry funded testing, but because Broley had a passion.
young eagles from 125 active nests. By 1958, he found only
one young eagle after searching 100 miles of Florida coastline.
Dr. James DeWitt’s experiments with DDT predicted this The science that explains this decline in bird populations already
effect on bird fertility by studying quail and pheasants, and his exists, but has not been taken seriously enough by those responsible
results have been replicated by many scientists around the for spreading chemical controls. Eagles, like every other species in
nation. The toxin is transferred across generations, causing nature’s web, are vulnerable to the accumulation of toxins in their
sterility or early mortality in young eagles. These eagles would environment and food supply. And as a top predator, eagles
have come into contact with DDT because of their diet of fish, resemble humans as an endpoint of biomagnification.
which often contain trace amounts gathered from the polluted
waterways and their food supply.
Treating seeds with pesticide in Britain led to “a deluge of Using the documented concerns of those in other nations to suggest
reports of dead birds,” and many there see insecticides as the that lawmakers in the United States, too, should take seriously the
biggest threat to wildlife of all time. Still, as the habit of threat of pesticides, Carson contrasts this concern in Britain with
pesticide use to ‘eradicate’ pests grows, some are targeting the dreadful example of Indiana farmers who chose to use parathion
birds directly. A group of farmers in Indiana used parathion to in an instance of direct violence against birds, rather than indirect,
kill 65,000 blackbirds and starlings. Who has the right to unpredicted destruction. Carson, again, asks why a select few, with
decide, on everyone else’s behalf, that such drastic measures little oversight, should have the right to make such choices that will
are necessary? impact everyone.
Continuing her chronicle of death in river systems, Carson The image of a blinded fish, plucked easily from the stream, is a
mentions reduced salmon runs in Maine that are also disturbing, unnatural one that contributes to the sense of a present
associated with budworm spraying, and describes fish blinded and future apocalypse brought on by pesticide use. This destruction
by DDT who are so disoriented that they can be plucked from can reach even those areas that men have decided to protect, as
the stream by hand. She goes on to discuss contamination of Carson shows by citing the example of Yellowstone, one of the
the Yellowstone River from 1955-57, when dead fish lined the country’s most popular national parks. Here, even sprayers seem to
riverbanks and an oily film covered the water. Agencies studied have acknowledged that all is not well.
the destruction caused by spraying 900,000 acres in that area
and concluded by taking a pledge to cooperate to minimize
losses in future control attempts.
In British Columbia, though, even after those engaging in Still, this acknowledgement is not necessarily enough to create
spraying had agreed to cooperate with forestry services, having change. The Canadian example shows that even relatively ‘careful’
seen the negative effects spraying had had on the Miramichi, aerial spraying is impossible to contain, especially when it enters the
many streams were still disastrously affected. 100 percent of water table, which we have already learned is a complex,
salmon were killed in at least four streams, and could only be interconnected one that accumulates chemicals.
repopulated by transplanting young salmon artificially, since
salmon return only to the place in the stream where they were
born.
The threat of pesticides to fish is threefold: direct spraying of Carson first emphasizes the consequences of fish death for
forest streams with DDT, bleaching of chemicals into the water commercial fishing industries, and for the major segment of the
table, and pesticides that reach marshes and bays. Commercial population for whom recreational fishing is a common activity. In
and recreational fishing are seriously endangered as a result. doing so she shows that pesticides – whose use is justified in that
Individual accounts from all over the country reinforce this they should save money in the form of undestroyed crops – in fact
danger. In Alabama, runoff containing the chemical toxaphene can result in huge financial losses. Then Carson follows up that
after heavy rains resulted in massive fish kills. Fish are very point by explaining that the deaths of these fish serve as a warning
sensitive, and can be an indicator of the ways in which toxic of the danger to humans as well.
chemicals persist in streams.
International examples, from Rhodesia and the Philippines, also Another reason to support the precautionary principle; evidence
illustrate the pervasive threat. In these countries, insecticides from all over the world demonstrates the interconnectedness of life,
that inadvertently contaminate fishponds used to raise and the unpredictability of substances that are poorly understood
important stocks of local fish have a serious effect on the food when they are introduced into complex systems.
supply. After a pond is infected, it is nearly impossible to
remove all chemical traces.
In 1955 on the eastern coast of Florida, in the Indian River The second vulnerable area is salt marshes, and this example
country, 2,000 acres of salt marsh were treated with Dieldrin in demonstrates why. Marshes are a system that spreads and recycles
an attempt to kill sandfly larvae. The treatment led to massive nutrients from the ocean, and so the introduction of chemicals leads
fish and crustacean mortality (20-30 tons of dead fish, or to a natural spreading of the poison, causing widespread death.
1,175,000 individual fish). Sharks were seen swimming through
the water, eating the masses of dead fish.
This episode shows that research is needed to determine the Here, for the first time, Carson considers the water system beyond
effects of chemical runoffs at sea and in important estuary/salt its freshwater streams, arguing that the accumulation among
marsh environments. These areas serve as the breeding plankton and shrimp of toxins could, as we have seen before, have
ground for many interconnected species. Shrimp fry and unintended effects. These small organisms render ‘acceptable’ limits
plankton have been shown to be very sensitive to pesticides, almost meaningless, since, in eating many shrimp or plankton, will
even at miniscule concentrations of parts per billion, and they concentrate its effects.
serve as a vehicle for bio-magnification that could pass poisons
up the chain to human consumers, according to Dr. Philip
Butler.
So much is unknown, concludes Carson, and these waterways This is a call for caution, a call aimed directly at the voices of public
are so vitally important, that the public should demand facts citizens, who must participate in the defense of important
and the suspension of spraying in the meantime. waterways.
Released accidentally in 1869, the gypsy moth spread Yet again, Carson offers us a case of pest control in which natural
throughout New England via wind and shipping. The methods had showed substantial success even before the decision
Adirondacks and thirteen imported parasites and predators to use pesticides. She mocks the attempt at ‘eradication,’ which is an
had successfully halted its spread further, but the Agriculture unattainable and undesirable goal, from her point of view. There is
Department still called for widespread spraying with the goal no reason that a pest must be completely exterminated; it can be
of ‘eradication.’ By 1957, 3 million acres of forests, farmland, controlled by natural means.
and suburban lawns were being sprayed despite an abundance
of public complaints.
Paid by the gallon sprayed rather than by the acre covered, The incentives are for more destruction, not less; this is the ultimate
pilots hired to perform the spraying did so indiscriminately, idiocy of the aerial spraying method, it attacks the natural world
with no regard for what was beneath them. As a result, without discriminating ‘good’ and ‘bad’, ultimately changing the
unintended casualties on the ground were hard to avoid. natural world by removing vital members of the ecology, such as
Hundreds of bee colonies died and crops suffered without honeybees. Again, the moth’s return shows the futility of these
these vital pollinators. Overall, the program was disastrous, and methods.
was curtailed in following years. In a pattern that mirrors what
we have seen before, the targeted gypsy moth reappeared in
the area despite renewed spraying.
In the South, the fire ant, which Carson argues was not in Carson exposes the propaganda campaign as an effort designed to
reality a very important pest, and may actually have helped in create an atmosphere of crisis that would justify intensive control
controlling other pests more harmful to agricultural interests, using pesticides, even though fire ants were never especially harmful
became the focus of attention after an intensive propaganda to crops. The lack of research shows a blatant lack of caution that
campaign that resulted in a “sales bonanza” in pesticides. This ignores the interconnected nature of ecological systems. Fear and
included the production of a horror film depicting the terrible, propaganda, argues Carson, have taken the place of coexistence
and potentially deadly effects of a fire ant bite – even though and tolerance.
the record of bites in the area was nearly non-existent. Despite
widespread protests, no research was done before the launch of
the million acre aerial campaign in 1958.
As we have seen in other cases, aerial spraying resulted in The inability of government agencies to acknowledge the
massive mortality in birds and ground animals, as well as widespread destruction their programs have caused shows an
livestock, throughout the Southern United States. Despite arrogant belief in their ability to control nature’s complexities, and
denials from the Department of Agriculture, ninety percent of an inability to take responsibility when that belief steers them in the
dead bird specimens studied by the Fish and Wildlife Service wrong direction. In a world in which man does have the power to
contained residue of the sprayed pesticides dieldrin or change his environment, it is especially important that he remain
heptachlor. Dr. Otis Poitevint, a veterinarian, saw many sick humble in the face of its careful balance.
farm animals, including a calf that was exposed via his mother’s
milk – and this raises new concerns about transmission to
human children.
In the wake of the program, fire ants were by no means After all of this damage to local ecosystems, the program’s mission –
‘eradicated,’ and in fact their numbers seem to have increased to eradicate fire ants – seems to have been a total failure. As in
in some states. A return to more “sane” methods has occurred other cases, more targeted spraying has proven far more effective
since the end of the aerial campaign, with selective, targeted while avoiding the negative consequences of aerial spraying, which
chemical treatment of individual mounds, which generates only comes off as lazy, short-sighted, and expensive.
one quarter the cost of aerial spraying and is much less
destructive to the surrounding ecosystem.
The assortment of ‘helpful’ home products containing The normalization of pesticide use – the sense that pesticides are
insecticide is vast, both for gardening and in the kitchen. It has just everyday simple tools that everyone uses – shows a lack of
become the norm to make use of such products, without a real public education, but also a general acceptance of the idea that
awareness of their dangers. Fewer than fifteen people out of a man can – and should – shape his environment according to what
hundred, according to a recent industrial film, read the seems most convenient. This rush toward aggressive methods of
warnings on their insecticide containers – which are often control shows a lack of precautions that ought to take precedence
hidden in the fine print. This leads to the unwitting application when one is dealing with a set of serious poisons. Carson asks
of chemicals in the home that ought to be treated with much rhetorically: Is this the responsibility of the individual consumer, or
more caution. New attachments available for sale even allow those who produce and market these products?
you to spray chemicals straight from your garden hose,
potentially contaminating water supplies.
Misuse of pesticides by farmers is acknowledged even within This tendency toward misuse is another point in favor of stiffer
the chemical industry, where publications warn against regulations or bans, since individual farmers will always, according
repeated spraying in short periods of time or careless overuse to their own sense of self-interest and in response to the all-too-
that seems to be widespread. The FDA, however, is severely effective marketing campaigns of pesticide producers, seek to
limited in the field of consumer protection because it has maximize the productivity of their own farms in what is a precarious
jurisdiction only over foods shipped across state lines. As if that industry. Those tasked with enforcing regulations now are woefully
weren’t limiting enough, its small staff is only able to inspect underfunded.
less than 1% of crops sold in the United States.
The system as it stands is broken – our daily existence is like The public must understand the dangers that it faces – and by
being a guest of the Borgias, that infamous family of Italian making use once more of a reference to the infamous Borgias,
poisoners. Residues of different chemicals mix in our meals Carson further emphasizes that these ‘harmless’ products should be
with unpredictable results and are cumulative, so the concept thought of as deadly poisons. The government’s current approach is
of a ‘safe level’ of tolerance for any individual chemical is underfunded and lulls citizens into a false sense of security that
useless and should be eliminated, as it only provides a false discourages action to ban pesticide residues outright.
sense of security to the public. These rules should be enforced
by a much more powerful FDA, and will require public
education to become effective.
Because of the hard to see, unpredictable, and delayed effects The difficulty of prioritizing future threats is one that must be
of absorbing small amounts of pesticides over time, it can be overcome by reliance on the precautionary principle. The best way
easy to ignore the problem. Humans seem programmed to to understand the danger is to look at what pesticides have already
shrug off disasters in the distant future, concerned only with done to the natural, inescapably interconnected systems of which
those effects that can be seen immediately. Still, we are we are a part – this has been Carson’s goal since the beginning of
vulnerable in the same way the robins were, as part of an the book.
interdependent system that scientists call ecology. Whenever
some part of this ecology is disrupted, its potential negative
effects on the other parts are difficult to predict.
The liver is a vital part of this body ecology, and the first line of Just as she has demonstrated the potentially disastrous effects of
defense against poisons. Anything that could disrupt the liver, chemicals that interact and are transformed by their environments
then, would greatly increase our vulnerability to environmental in the wild, Carson here relates this danger to human health by
toxins. Methoxychlor, for example, is absorbed 100x faster showing how certain chemicals can cripple natural defenses.
when found in combination with another chemical that
handicaps the liver.
Sensitivity to synthetic pesticides varies from person to person, Given the prevalence of chemical residues, which Carson has
and seems also to vary depending on previous exposures to a already outlined in the previous chapter, we are all vulnerable to
given chemical. With each renewed contact, symptoms can these prolonged exposures – this is another point in favor of
return or worsen with exposure to smaller doses. Moreover, rethinking the current idea about tolerable levels of chemical
unlike in laboratories, no chemical in real life is ever residue on food. The interconnected, messy, complex world is just
encountered alone, and, as we saw with the discussion of too difficult to simulate in a laboratory setting, where these limits
polluted streams and waterways, the effects of the interaction are established.
between them are largely unstudied.
Pesticides’ effects on the nervous system are long lasting and As with her reference to the Borgias, Carson makes use of an
little understood. During prohibition, a bootlegged alcohol infamous event from history to illustrate the poisonous nature of
substitute called Jamaican Ginger included a chemical in the pesticides. Is it not strange, given the storied harm of these
family of organic phosphates. 15,000 people developed a substances, that they should be allowed to invade our present and
crippling paralysis as a result of drinking this particular future so easily? Learning from the example of history should
moonshine. The same type of paralysis was seen again when suggest that caution and research are required before undertaking
pesticides came into use two decades later. In clinical work such a risk.
from the University of Melbourne, pesticides were
subsequently linked to mental disease as well – “a heavy price
to pay for the temporary destruction of a few insects.”
The disruption of the oxidation process has an effect on fertility By linking this examination of the process by which cells produce
that is visible in eggs and other germ cells in animals – this energy to sterility in birds, Carson is driving home her point that
might explain the sterility that has been observed in birds after humans are vulnerable to the same harm that we see affecting the
exposure to DDT. If pesticides prevent ADP from coupling with natural world. ATP, the energy unit at the core of this process, is
a new phosphate group, respiration continues but no energy is universal, and so its effects in other species will be mirrored in
created, so that the body uses power without creating any. humans – just as it was with the sprayers, early in the book, who
Because ATP is “the universal currency of energy,” the driving were paralyzed by a new malarial spray.
energy force in life everywhere, its disruption in other species
is a sign that humans can also be affected. We are not immune.
Carson returns to the plight of the birds, recalling the sterile The problem of sterility is a chief factor in the decline of these
blue robin eggs and the larger, white eagle eggs, “cold and emblematic bird species, and this understanding of the cellular
lifeless.” Observations of DDT levels in unhatched bird eggs energy production process offers one explanation – again suggesting
have shown unsafe concentrations, which according to that the same sterility could strike humans with the right level of
scientists’ understanding of the oxidation process outlined exposure to DDT.
above would have disrupted the proper production of ATP and
crippled development of fledglings.
Humanity’s “genetic heritage” is also under threat, in a way that Equally alarming are the effects of pesticides on cell division,
mirrors the problems of radiation, which can cause mutations another process that is universal across the world of living creatures,
that are passed down over generations. Cell division, or meaning that disruptions in one species – of fish, for example, who
mitosis—the process by which one cell divides into two—is often suffer mutations from their chemical environments – could be
another universal process in the natural world that is affected mirrored in humans. The danger of mutations is associated with
by radiation and by mutagens, including common pesticides. nuclear radiation – which was a huge topic at the time that Silent
Mitosis involves a careful alignment of chromosomes, which Spring was published, coming in the midst of the Cold War and just
are the structures made up of DNA, so that all the genetic a few decades of the dropping of the atomic bombs. Carson
information is split evenly between two daughter cells. This captures the urgency of the pesticide issue by making it clear that
process may be 1000 million years old, and is part of what has pesticides, in their dangerously rapid development, pose a similar
allowed life to flourish. threat to nuclear radiation in the way they affect cells.
Far too little is known about the effects of pesticides on cell If exposure to pesticides can cause mental and physical illness – and
division, but it is clear that disruptions in chromosome Carson has provided ample evidence that it may – then are we not
replication are responsible for a wide range of mental and responsible as a nation, or even as a species, for halting the advance
physical illnesses. These dangers are widely discussed with of these dangerous chemicals? Carson makes the case that a basic
regard to radiation, but the potential for chemicals to cause level of caution is needed to prevent a future in which man creates
mutations is underappreciated and has not been sufficiently his own downfall by continuing down his current path.
studied. It seems absurd, argues Carson, to continue exposing
ourselves to such a potentially dangerous cocktail of chemicals
for so little benefit.
In the modern era, exposure is no longer merely an This shift that Carson signals, from dangers faced by workers in
occupational hazard, but rather an environmental one—we are particular industries to environmental dangers that affect everyone,
all vulnerable wherever we go, exposed to rapidly increasing is a key part of our modern understanding of health risks. Exposure
number of carcinogens. Cancer rates are rising, argues Carson is no longer the result of any choice - about where to work, how to
– 45,000,000 Americans now living will develop cancer at some process materials, etc – but rather a fact of modern life, to which
point. Children, for whom cancer was a rarity as recently as a everyone submits. This could explain why even children are now
quarter century ago, are also increasingly vulnerable, with being affected by rising cancer rates, although they have never
more children dying of cancer in America than any other worked in an industrial setting. How can we assign responsibility in
disease. The question is: could the pesticides we are using to this new era?
try and control nature be one cause of this increase?
Arsenic is not the only carcinogenic pesticide, however. One This is another example of the ways in which financial incentives
chemical widely used against mites and ticks is an example of can override safety concerns, so that instead of using caution we see
ways in which slow-moving legal processes can allow cancer- chemical manufacturers forging ahead in pursuit of profit. The
causing agents to remain in use even though danger is responsibility for this oversight is shared by the manufacturer and
suspected. Although the FDA’s scientists had interpreted initial the regulatory system, and the public served as guinea pig for both.
testing of the pesticide as possibly cancer-producing, the In an era when man’s creations have the power to cause cancer, a
chemical’s manufacturer filed an appeal of their initial ruling of stricter moral responsibility and principle of precaution must apply.
‘zero-tolerance’ for crop residues, and the committee’s decision
was changed to a tolerance of one part per million, an
unenforceable level that essentially made the public into
unwitting guinea pigs.
Even after the chemical’s cancer-causing effects were further The political and legal system, even in the face of definite evidence,
confirmed by testing with lab animals two years later, it took is too slow to combat the rapid proliferation of dangerous, cancer-
another year of legal work before the tolerance level could be causing chemicals. The public must demand a new system.
reduced back to zero in 1958 – and the agency’s ability to
enforce this level is open to questions.
Dr. Hueper also rates DDT as a carcinogen, and two herbicides There is enough evidence to justify a radical new approach to the
(IPC and CIPC) have been shown to produce skin tumors in regulation of chemicals, one that is based in the precautionary
mice. The FDA found aminotriazole, an herbicidal chemical principle and safeguards future generations against the dangerous
widely used by cranberry growers, to cause thyroid cancer at substances with which we are poisoning our present. More power of
any level of exposure, and subsequently seized contaminated the environment in this new era also requires a more careful,
berries. Some questioned this choice, but further testing responsible approach to its management.
confirmed that more than half of lab rats exposed to the
chemical at a rate of 100 parts per million in their drinking
water developed tumors.
15-30 years of latency may pass between exposure to a Carson’s suggestion of future, unknown dangers is meant to shift
carcinogen and development of disease, so the full maturing of priorities within the public, giving people a reason to think
the threat has yet to arrive. Leukemia has a shorter latency cautiously about the long-term. As a demonstration of the potential
period, and anecdotes show chemicals have a causal relation to long-term dangers, the increasing frequency of leukemia and blood
all types of blood and lymph diseases, which are on the rise at a diseases can serve as a warning sign that should not be ignored.
rate of 4-5% each year. Dr. Hargraves sees an unmistakable link
between these blood diseases and environmental exposure to
toxic substances.
Researchers must again examine the body on a cellular level to Here, Carson recalls the fundamental, universal processes that were
understand cancer’s origins. Professor Otto Warburg believes explained in the previous chapter: energy production and cell
that when respiration is disrupted in individual cells, which can division. Disruptions to one or both of these processes might be at
happen as a result of pesticide exposure, the race to the root of cancer, and we have already seen that pesticides can
compensate might cause cancerous growths. Another theory provide that disruption. By listing the various theories, Carson also
suggests that disruption of chromosome replication, another emphasizes how little is known for certain, a common theme used
effect of pesticide exposure, causes unregulated cell division, a to encourage caution and research.
hallmark of cancerous growth. Exposure that disrupts the
liver’s normal workings can also cause estrogen to accumulate
in a way that might stimulate the growth of cancer cells.
Again, Carson emphasizes that interactions between chemicals The interconnectedness of nature allows us to take the effects of
that are now omnipresent in the environment may also amplify carcinogens on one species – in this case fish – as a sign that
their carcinogenic effects, and radioactive contamination could humans could be affected. Carson again uses the warning bells of
also change the nature of individual chemicals. We cannot nuclear radiation to her advantage, and urges caution in the face of
know the full extent of these dangers with certainty, but the unknown dangers.
development of cancer in fish is an early warning sign for
human health, as Dr. Hueper notes.
Dr. Hueper believes that, just as the previous generation of The optimism here is a welcome change – even though man has
medical researchers found success eliminating disease- created the new era of environmental disease, it is also within his
carrying pathogens and focusing on prevention, we must work power to end it. However, the public must take collective
to clear our environment of the carcinogens with which we are responsibility if it hopes to avoid a future in which cancer is
populating it on an increasing basis. This will be more effective omnipresent. We should avoid the temptation of the easy way out,
than a magic bullet ‘cure’ for cancer. There is hope. Since we and stop relying on development to find a cure.
have created these carcinogens, we can also eliminate them
from our lifestyles if we act collectively.
This phenomenon explains why after sprayings pests have been The record of man’s attempted interventions seems to prove they
seen to rebound massively, as Carson proves with accounts are foolish. Over and over again, the interconnected, complex
from all over the world. Blackflies in Ontario became 17 times ecology into which pesticides enters is changed in such a way that
more abundant after spraying was completed. The spider mite the targeted pests are actually allowed to thrive! By spreading this
has become a worldwide pest since DDT has killed off its message to the public, Carson is clearly aiming to motivate a change
natural enemies, attacking evergreen trees with its voracious in the everyday citizen’s understanding of pesticides and their
appetite for chlorophyll, which makes leaves green. This effectiveness, weighed against the dangers they pose.
happened in 1956 when western national forests were sprayed
with DDT after a budworm infestation, and the following
summer brought a blight of brown trees.
Conversely, imported natural predators have shown good Following nature’s example by taking advantage of the web of
results in reducing populations – until they themselves are checks and balances, importing predators and parasites to deal with
eliminated by pesticides. In California, great success with an ballooning pest populations, is a much more sustainable and
inexpensive biological control involving a parasite of the effective option. This is what the new era of man should look like.
destructive scale insect was reversed when spraying killed off
the parasite, a small ladybug called the vedalia. New methods
are more expensive and destructive, and less coordinated.
This effect is still more sinister when considered in the context Another unintended consequence of intervention into the
of disease-carrying insects. Mosquitoes that carry malaria interconnected system of nature is the spread of disease, when
flourish from a lack of predators after chemicals are applied, pests that carry pathogens are allowed to multiply without their
unless pesticides are re-applied year after year. Snails, which natural predators. We must protect ourselves from this danger by
can transmit parasitic worms, seem to be immune to pesticides, exercising caution.
and their numbers increase when their natural predators are
killed off by sprayings.
Despite the seeming folly of pesticides and the promise of To break out of the pattern of crises that justifies spending on
biological solutions, research into chemical options for control pesticides, we must invest in biological solutions, which Carson has
of “pests” far exceeds that for biological ones. One reason is shown are more compatible with ecological communities. Unless we
that insecticide companies endow fellowships and research, as a species want to live on the edge of survival – struggling just to
but no corollary exists for biological control. Dr. A.D. Pickett is survive – these biological controls must be publicly supported as a
one exception, pioneering natural methods and minimizing the replacement for pesticides.
damage of specifically applied, gentler pesticides. He
denounces indiscriminate spraying, describing it as a route to
crisis after crisis.
Organizations combating disease-carrying insects are acutely In areas where control is necessary because of disease, the use of
aware of the problem. Carson lists cases of resistance among pesticides has backfired as insects gain immunity to more and more
mosquitoes, ticks, houseflies, rat fleas, lice, and many more, chemicals. Underestimating the power of nature to adapt has led
each of which can carry a different infectious disease. This man into a situation where escalation of the ‘war’, that is, the
issue must be dealt with, but it seems questionable to choose a development of more and more dangerous chemicals, seems
solution that seems to be rapidly worsening the problem necessary.
instead of a more natural option.
Cases everywhere from Egypt to the United States Since the very early days of pesticide use, the development of
demonstrate that pesticides are in nearly every case only a immunity in targeted insects has been observable. But rather than
temporary solution to a serious problem. Perhaps the first stopping to question how this cycle will end, scientists and
medical use of pesticides occurred in Italy in 1943, when DDT controllers have created and used increasingly toxic chemicals in an
dusting was used to control against typhus carrying attempt to overcome the immunities – only to see nature respond
mosquitoes. Within one year, mosquitoes of a particular genus with more resistance. Caution, rather than automatic escalation, is
had begun to show resistance to DDT. In 1948, Chlordane was required.
added to the chemical cocktail, and achieved good results -
until flies and mosquitoes developed resistance to it two years
later.
This pattern is repeated around the world. In Korea, and many As Carson demonstrates, the problem of immunity is a difficult one
other countries, lice have become completely resistant to DDT. to address. If the public knew about this wave of resistance – and
In fact, individuals tested in Korea actually had more lice after once Carson’s book has been published the public will know –
the application of DDT. The rate at which insects develop perhaps they would be more cautious in developing ever-stronger
resistance is also remarkable. In 1956, the number of mosquito chemicals. Instead, currently caution has been thrown to the wind
species displaying resistance was only 5 – by 1960 this number in the pursuit of control over “pests” and nature.
had increased to 28, including carriers of malaria in West
Africa, the Middle East, Central America, Indonesia, and
Eastern Europe.
In dealing with upsurges of cockroaches, ticks, mosquitoes, and This escalation of pesticide toxicity is like an arms race, in which two
more, in regions from Central Park West to Indonesia to Iran, opposing sides continue to one up each other until something gives
control agencies are currently cycling through pesticides as and destruction follows. The problem is that the increasingly deadly
insects develop resistances. The same story is seen in insects weapons that we are deploying are not targeting only the insects,
that threaten agricultural crops – spraying only strengthens but also disrupting the natural system and, in the end, causing
pests. The chemical industry wishes to ignore resistance, but illness in humans.
mounting costs betray the increased difficulty.
This endless escalation resembles an arms race, in which two Here Carson makes clear her comparison of the dynamic between
sides compete to develop more advanced weaponry, and end insects and pesticide manufacturers to an arms race. This arms race
up with an arsenal of destructive forces that cause more harm will lead to an extremely fraught future, as man struggles to keep up
than good – it is difficult to see a positive conclusion to this with the pace of his own development with dangerous
competition. More officials like Dr. Briejer, Holland’s Director consequences for the fragile balance of the natural environment, as
of Plant Protection Service, are now calling for a reduction in we have already seen. This is as much a moral question as it is a
spraying as a result of these dangerous dynamics. Life is a scientific one.
miracle beyond our understanding, writes Carson, and requires
reverence and humility rather than scientific arrogance or
pride.
As an alternative, she suggests that it is our responsibility to After an entire book dedicated to the many dangers of pesticide use,
choose the path of caution, of biological solutions based on Carson will devote this last chapter to a discussion of safer, more
careful research and ecological understanding. The availability natural alternatives that take into account the interconnectedness
of these biotic controls is growing as more researchers join the of nature. She leaves it for the public to decide which is better.
quest to replace pesticides with a smarter option. Carson goes
on to summarize these new options.
Dr. Edward Knipling has developed a ‘male sterilization’ This is an example of a carefully targeted alternative, which in
technique, in which sterilized males of a species are released contrast to pesticides would have fewer consequences on other
and gradually outcompete wild males until only infertile eggs parts of the natural community. It is still a celebration of science and
are produced. He conducted a successful proof of concept on the future of human development, but development in the model of
the island of Curacao, eliminating the native screw-worm nature, rather than that which attempts to supersede it.
population after releasing thousands of sterilized males from a
plane. The program was then replicated on a huge scale in the
Southeast, with great results.
Still more methods are under examination; some researchers Continuing her mission to educate the public about other options,
are working with ultrasound waves, while others have Carson recalls the success of milky spore disease in controlling the
developed disease vectors that are meant to be extremely Japanese. Although modern ecologists, with more research and
species specific, as previously discussed with the milky spore knowledge at their disposal than Carson had when she wrote the
disease and the Japanese beetle in Chapter 7. Carson book, would likely argue that her support of these methods seems to
confidently asserts that these microbial insecticides are fail to acknowledge the dangers to the balance of an ecosystem that
harmless to all but their intended targets. eliminating any member of the community can bring, her optimism
is understandable relative to the intensely destructive methods of
chemical control.
And, of course, there is the option of biotic control involving Returning to one of her favorite alternative models, Carson again
imported predators or parasites. Beginning with the vedalia explains the ways that importing predators or strengthening other
beetles brought to California by Alfred Koebele in 1888, there natural checks can allow the system to correct itself, bringing pest
is a long history of successful importations that save millions of populations under control in the way that a millennia of evolution
dollars each year. Still, biological methods are underutilized has already provided for. Again, modern ecologists would argue that
outside California. Opportunity is greatest in forests, where careful research is required before the introduction of any foreign
support for natural predators like spiders, small mammals, and species – and might argue that there are even better ways to control
birds in Wurzburg and Canada has been shown to allow for a “pests” than to rely on using either man-made chemical control or
pest-resistant, balanced ecology as it was meant to be. non-native species in efforts at biological control – but Carson’s
basic optimism about this tactic is more of a reflection of her
attitude toward nature and man’s place within it: that man belongs
within nature, and not trying to control it.
So, there exists a whole battery of alternatives to pesticides if Carson argues that pesticides, although a tempting reflection of
we can make the choice to forego the flashy, arrogant chemical man’s newfound power in the world, have inflated our sense of that
option. Carson compares pesticides to the crudeness of a power to a point that will lead to our destruction. If we cannot
caveman’s club, a barrage “hurled against the fabric of life.” return to a place of respect for nature and the complex systems that
Nature, she concludes, does not exist for the convenience of it contains, Carson argues that we are hurrying rapidly toward a
man, and cannot be controlled by him. We must not turn our future without many of those things that have been essential to the
modern and terrible weapons, in ignorance, against the earth experience of being human, and that it is our collective
that supports us. responsibility to exercise caution, conduct research, and slow down
the pace of development to preserve our world and save ourselves.
To cite any of the quotes from Silent Spring covered in the Quotes
HOW T
TO
O CITE section of this LitChart:
To cite this LitChart: MLA
MLA Carson, Rachel. Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin. 2002.
Lorenz, Ben. "Silent Spring." LitCharts. LitCharts LLC, 4 Oct 2015. CHICA
CHICAGO
GO MANU
MANUAL
AL
Web. 21 Apr 2020.
Carson, Rachel. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 2002.
CHICA
CHICAGO
GO MANU
MANUAL
AL
Lorenz, Ben. "Silent Spring." LitCharts LLC, October 4, 2015.
Retrieved April 21, 2020. [Link]
spring.