0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views8 pages

Earth Science: Universe and Solar System Origins

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views8 pages

Earth Science: Universe and Solar System Origins

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Escuela San Gabriel de Colegio de San

Gabriel
Arcangel Foundation, Inc. Arcangel of
Caloocan, Inc.
Phase 10 Package 6 Blk 1 Lots 2-4, Bagong Silang, Caloocan City
Tel. #734-9511/785-6950

GRADE 11/12 EARTH SCIENCE


MODULE 1: The formation of the universe and the solar system
🎯 YOUR GOALS:
After completing the learning activities for this lesson, you are expected to:
 describe the historical development of the theories that explain the origin of the universe, and;
 compare the different hypothesis explaining the origin of the solar system

YOUR INITIAL TASK:

When we look at up at the sky, we see clouds, sun during the day, moon and countless stars
at night. When we look at our surrounding, we see things with life and things which do not have life. These
things made us realized that the Earth is an amazing planet. But have you ever wondered, where did these
things came from? When and how did the universe begin?

What comes in your mind when you hear the word universe? By using the graphic organizer below, share your
ideas about the universe. Write words that describe the universe.
YOUR DISCUSSION TEXT:

All the stars systems, galaxies, gas and dusts, including all the matter and energy that exist at present,
and will exist in the future are contained in the universe. The universe is so vast that it includes all of space
and time. The study of the universe is called cosmology.

In an effort to make sense of the universe, humans use religion, traditions, philosophy, and science to
describe its origin and structure. Humankind most recent understanding of the universe is built upon previous
knowledge and enhanced by integrating data acquired from latest technologies.

HOW DID THE UNIVERSE ORIGINATE?

The Theory of Creation

The narrative from Genesis, one of the books of the Hebrew


Bible and Christian Old Testament, describe how God separated
light from darkness, created the sky, land, sea, moon, stars and
every living creature in a span of six days, as seen in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Theory of Creation


The Theory of Oscillating Universe

An oscillating universe was Albert Einstein’s favored model after rejecting his own original model. The
oscillating universe followed the general theory of relativity equations of the universe with positive curvature.
This curvature resulted in the expansion of the universe for a time, and then to its contraction due to the pull
of its gravity in a perpetual cycle of big bang and big crunch.

Steady State Theory

Proposed by astronomers Fred Hoyle, Thomas Gold and


Hermann Bondi, the steady state theory predicted a universe that
expanded but did not change its density-matter was inserted into
the universe as it expanded in order to maintain a constant density.

Big Bang Theory Figure 2. Fred Hoyle

The current accepted model on the formation of the universe. The Big Bang describes the universe as
expanding, having originated from an infinitely tiny dense point around 14billion years ago. According to this
theory, matter was not present at the beginning of time; there was only pure energy compressed in a single
point called singularity, as illustrated in Figure 3.
The big bang caused rapid inflation and expansion of the universe. At that point, the universe was
extremely hot that matter could not form. After about three minutes, with the universe continuously
expanding it started to cool down allowing matter to form.
After 100 million years, stars and galaxies began to form. The overall composition of the universe
transitioned from light elements to solid particles in the form of nebula. This nebulae would later form the star
systems and planets known today.

Figure 3.

The Big Bang


Theory
Timeline

The fundamental statement of the Big Bang theory is attributed to Belgian Catholic priest Georges
Lemaitre in 1927. It was later supported by Edwin Hubble’s demonstration of the continuously expanding
universe through his observation of galactic red shifts in 1929 and the discovery of the cosmic microwave
background radiation by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson in 1965.
 Redshift is a phenomenon where electromagnetic
radiation (such as light) from an object undergoes
an increase in wavelength. Hubble observed that
most galaxies have spectral shifts that move
towards the red end of spectrum which occurs
when a light emitting object move away from the
observer, SEE Figure 4.

Figure 4. Redshift and Blue Shift

 Cosmic Microwave Background was


accidentally discovered by Penzias and
Wilson earned them the Nobel Physics Prize
in 1978. It can be observed as strikingly
uniform faint glow in the microwave band
coming from all directions-blackbody
radiation with an average temperature of
about 2.7degrees above absolute zero

Figure 5. Arno Panzias and Robert Wilson

HOW DID THE SOLAR SYSTEM ORIGINATE?

Figure 6. The
Solar System
As shown in Figure 6, the universe may have begun with the big bang which occurred 13.8 billion years
ago, but it was only after one billion years that galaxies began to form. The age of the Solar System and that of
the planet Earth is approximately 4.54 billion years old. This is based on the age of meteorites which are
believed to have been formed the same time as the rest of the Solar system.

Encounter Hypothesis
States that about 5 billion years ago, a rogue star passed
close to the sun and stripped materials (hot gases) from both the
sun and the rogue star. The hot gases continued to spin in the
same direction as the sun and fused into smaller lumps which
formed the planets.
The encounter hypothesis as shown in Figure 7, was able
to explain why all the planets revolve in the same direction and
why the inner plants are denser than the outer ones. However, it
failed to explain how lumps of hot gases contract to form planets
because hot gas usually expands.

Nebular Hypothesis
In the 1700s Emanuel Swedenborg, Immanuel Kant,
and Pierre-Simon Laplace stated that the entire solar system
started as a large cloud of gas that contracted due to self-
gravity. Conservation of angular momentum requires that a
rotating disk form with a large concentration at the center
which form the protosun, while planets would begin forming
within the disk.
However, this hypothesis does not provide a
mechanism to explain why the disk would turn into individual
planets. Refer to Figure 8 for illustration.
Figure 8. Nebular
Hypothesis

Protoplanet Hypothesis
The present working model on the
formation of the Solar System which is built on the
main concepts of the nebular hypothesis
(improvement of nebular hypothesis). It stated
that the solar system began with a fragment form
an interstellar cloud composed mainly of
hydrogen, helium and trace amounts of the light
elements. The fragments of the interstellar clouds
then formed the dense central region of the solar
nebula. As the solar nebula contracted, it rotated
rapidly, conserving its angular momentum,
materials continued to fall inward from its
surroundings. The solar nebula eventually formed
the sun. Figure 9 further illustrates Protoplanet Figure 9.
Hypothesis. Protoplanet
Hypothesis

As the accretion of small particles continued, larger asteroid sized aggregates called planetesimals
were formed, which orbited the center of the solar nebula. The planetesimals further grew that would later
become planets.
Planetesimals differed in chemical composition depending on their initial distance from the sun. As a
result, the terrestrial planets formed near the center portion of the solar nebula, while the gas giants, formed
in the outer disk which remained relatively cooler.

Sources:
 Felicita, Corazon N. Breaking Through Earth Science
 Olivar, Jose T, et. Al. Exploring Life Through Science: Earth Science

YOUR REINFORCEMENT TASKS:


Since we are already done with the discussion, lets now check your understanding by
answering the following tasks.

TASK 1: Concept Map


Directions: Fill in the boxes with the correct theories and evidences that supports the idea of an expanding
universe

UNIVERS
Theories of Evidences of Where lies the
origin: Expanding
(explain briefly)
Solar
universe:
(explain briefly) System
1.
1. Theories of
2.
origin: (explain
2. briefly)
3.
4. 1.
2.

TASK 2: ILLUSTRATION
Directions: Make an illustration detailing the major events that happened during the Big Bang Theory.
YOUR ENRICHMENT TASK:

#1 REFLECTIVE WRITING
Write a short paragraph about your opinion on why the big bang theory is the most accepted theory on the
origin of the universe. Make your answer brief and concise, express your answer using 5-10 sentences only.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The nebular hypothesis, a theory concerning solar system formation, focuses on the evolution of a gas cloud contracting under gravity to form the sun and planets, emphasizing local solar-scale phenomena . In contrast, the oscillating universe theory deals with the cyclical nature of the universe as a whole, involving repeated big bangs and big crunches on a universal scale, highlighting a dynamic cosmological model as opposed to the formation of individual solar systems . These theories thus differ fundamentally in scale and focus, with one explaining local solar formation and the other explaining universal cycles.

The protoplanet hypothesis explains planetary diversity by attributing it to the varying conditions within the early solar nebula. It suggests that as the nebula contracted, material differentiation occurred due to temperature and distance from the sun: terrestrial planets formed in hotter regions nearer to the sun, leading to rockier, denser compositions, while gas giants formed in cooler, distant regions, allowing for accumulation of light gases like hydrogen and helium . This hypothesis accounts for compositional differences among planets based on initial accretion conditions and spatial distribution within the solar nebula.

Hubble's observations of redshift demonstrated that most galaxies are moving away from us, as observed from their spectral lines shifting towards the red end of the spectrum. This redshift implies that galaxies are receding, providing compelling evidence for an expanding universe. The direct relationship Hubble identified, known as Hubble's Law, shows that the velocity of a galaxy's recessional movement is proportional to its distance from Earth, reinforcing the concept of a uniformly expanding universe originating from a singular event, as described by the Big Bang Theory . This understanding demarcates an ever-expanding cosmological model.

Cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation is the thermal remnant radiation from the time of recombination in Big Bang cosmology, predicted to exist as a blackbody radiation across the universe after initial conditions cooled. This radiation's uniform temperature of approximately 2.7 degrees Kelvin provides strong evidence for the hot, dense state of the early universe, as it matches predictions made by the Big Bang Theory concerning temperature uniformity and cooling over time . The discovery and measurement of this radiation by Penzias and Wilson in 1965 provided crucial empirical support for the Big Bang model, confirming a fundamental characteristic of an expanding and evolving universe.

Key technological and observational milestones reinforcing the Big Bang Theory include Edwin Hubble's observation of galactic redshift, indicating an expanding universe, and the measurement of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation by instruments like the COBE and WMAP satellites, confirming the theory's predictions about thermal remnants from the early universe . Additionally, increasingly precise measurements of the CMB by the Planck satellite have refined parameters of cosmic history, supporting the Big Bang model's predictive accuracy regarding temperature anisotropies. These milestones have consistently upheld the theory's foundational claims, intertwining observation with theoretical predictions.

The encounter hypothesis posits that a rogue star passed near the sun, pulling hot gases from both, leading to planet formation. However, it fails to explain how these hot gases could condense to form planets, as gases generally expand rather than contract into solid bodies . Additionally, the hypothesis does not adequately address the distribution and chemical composition of matter within the solar system, nor does it convincingly explain the angular momentum distribution observed within planetary orbits . These limitations prevent the hypothesis from fully accounting for the complex processes involved in the solar system's formation.

The oscillating universe theory suggests that the universe undergoes indefinite cycles of expansion and contraction, implying a universe with positive curvature that alternates between a big bang and a big crunch . In contrast, the steady state theory proposes a universe that expands while maintaining a constant density, hypothesizing that matter is continuously created to fill the increasing volume, thus avoiding changes in density . This means the steady state theory denies a cyclical model and proposes an eternally ongoing expansion without contraction phases.

The Big Bang Theory represents a significant advancement over the steady state theory because it accounts for observed astronomical phenomena such as redshift and cosmic microwave background radiation. Unlike the steady state theory, which posits continuous creation of matter and a constant density universe, the Big Bang Theory explains the universe's dynamic characteristics and provides a comprehensive historical account of its evolution from a singular, dense state . The empirical support from cosmic microwave background radiation and redshifts further cements the Big Bang Theory's credibility as it aligns with observation, unlike the continuous expansion posited by the steady state theory that lacks similar empirical backing.

The protoplanet hypothesis builds on the nebular hypothesis by providing a more detailed explanation of how planets form from a rotating disk of gas and dust. While the nebular hypothesis posited that the solar system began as a large cloud of gas that contracted due to self-gravity, forming a rotating disk, the protoplanet hypothesis elaborates that fragments from an interstellar cloud formed dense regions leading to planet formation. It describes the creation of planetesimals from accreting small particles, which eventually grow into planets, thereby addressing the lack of a mechanism in the nebular hypothesis for disk-to-planet transitions .

The Big Bang Theory is supported by several pieces of evidence, such as Hubble's observation of galactic redshifts, which demonstrated that most galaxies are moving away from us, suggesting an expanding universe . Additionally, the discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation by Penzias and Wilson provided evidence of remnants from the early, hot universe, predicted by the Big Bang model . These findings are pivotal because they correlate with predictions about an expanding universe originating from an initial singularity, making the Big Bang the most accepted model for cosmological formation.

You might also like