Fatwa MUI on Bitcoin and Digital Wallets
Fatwa MUI on Bitcoin and Digital Wallets
Asma Munifatussaidah*1
Jihan Nabila Zahara2
Fuad Zein3
1, 3
Program of Islamic Economy and Halal Industry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
2
Islamic Religious Faculty, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia
Email: asmamunifatussaidah@[Link].id1; jihannabilazahara@[Link].id2; pakde.2013@yahoo.com3
INTRODUCTION
The rapid development of information and digital technology has given rise to
many new technological innovations which cannot be avoided and have a big impact on
many fields. Technology users have to continue adapting in order to keep up with the flow
of increasingly modern times (Afërdita & Mihane, 2015). In line with the emergence of
increasingly numerous and diverse technologies, Indonesia, as a country that tends to
quickly capture change, is also experiencing many changes, especially in the characteristics
and lifestyle of the community. These changes provide convenience and positive effects
on the lives of Indonesian people, one of which is ease in the conducting of transactions,
where financial activities that were originally carried out in person have become online
transactions. Financial and banking companies are starting to innovate by introducing
electronic money, which has emerged as a new innovation that answers people's needs
(Martins, 2019; Solihin, 2021).
Significantly, the demand for electronic money is increasing, starting from being a
trend to meeting their daily needs, for example, paying for groceries, buying food, and so
on. In 2009, the first regulation of Bank Indonesia regarding electronic money was issued,
which made the circulation status of electronic money legally valid (Bank Indonesia, 2018).
Initially, electronic money innovation was limited to involving a card or being chip-based,
and it has since expanded to the emergence of server-based electronic money products
(Bank Indonesia, 2018). With these two types of electronic money, people can use them
to make digital transactions without needing to use cash.
Currently, the use of electronic money in Indonesia has increased significantly,
reaching 38 trillion per month during 2018-2023 (BI Institute, 2023). According to Bank
Indonesia’s research results, server-based electronic money is the most popular product
among the public, especially young people. Known as an e-wallet (digital wallet), this is a
popular financial innovation because it is considered more effective and efficient. With a
digital wallet, users have the convenience of depositing their money by transferring it into
an application, known as a top up (Rahayu & Nashirudin, 2023). E-wallets also offer many
benefits to the user community, including discount vouchers. In general, digital wallet
products are only issued by conventional companies which have many advantages, raising
questions for the Muslim community regarding the validity of the sharia principles
contained therein.
Indonesia, with most of its citizens being Muslim, is interested in muamalah issues
in accordance with Islamic law. The use of digital wallets by Muslims is increasingly
widespread. If viewed through sharia principles, doubts will arise regarding the issuance
process related to the use of digital wallets and also the addition of costs in financial
transactions via digital wallets. These are questionable regarding their conformity with
Islamic law (Nawawi, 2012; Syifa et al., 2022). Apart from that, they raise further questions
about what the difference is between conventional digital wallets and sharia. There are
often differences of opinion among scholars in determining digital wallet contracts. Apart
from the differences of opinion among ulama regarding sharia principles, in 2017, the MUI
DSN Fatwa stipulated Islamic legal provisions for the use and issuance of sharia electronic
money in Indonesia, namely fatwa No. 116/DSN-MUI/IX/2017, as an answer to the doubts
of Indonesian Muslims regarding the law on using digital wallets.
It doesn't stop at whether or not you can use a digital wallet. There are also doubts
arising regarding what to use when topping up your digital wallet balance. The opinions of
jurisprudence experts also differ regarding contracts. From an Islamic perspective, the
topping up of digital wallet balances between publishers and users is, according to some
scholars, seen as various contracts. There are additional rules according to the MUI DSN
regarding electronic money, namely that the nominal amount of electronic money held by
the issuer must be placed in a sharia bank (Al Hadi, 2017; Ardiningrum et al., 2022).
As in the previous research discussing fiqh studies on digital wallets, Abdulfattah
and Kurniawan, (2018) analyzed (takyif fiqh) the contracts used in electronic money
transactions. Alhusni and Mustiah, (2019) and Syifa et al. (2022) discussed how Islamic
economic law views the appropriateness of using electronic money. Syamsuri et al (2020)
also studied the suitability of electronic money transactions according to maqashid sharia.
Some of this research has tried to find a common ground for contracts that are the most
in accordance with sharia provisions in the implementation of electronic money
transactions.
Adding to or refilling the funds/balances of digital wallets (topping up) is also highly
questionable as to whether or not it is in accordance with sharia principles. This is because
more digital wallet issuers are offering benefits that users will get if they top up their
balance. These benefits include free shipping vouchers, discount/discount vouchers, and
cashback. Even though additional balance top ups can be interpreted as a gift from the
publisher for using the application, these additions can also be interpreted as usury, where
usury is haram in Islam. Differences in jurisprudential opinion have also emerged along
with the various contracts imposed in digital wallet transactions.
Therefore, in this article, we will analyze contemporary problems in the
development of digital wallets according to Islamic economic law with the aim of
explaining digital wallets according to Islamic law and fatwas. This is as well as analyzing
digital wallet balance top-up transactions according to sharia, and analyzing cashback
from transactions digital wallet according to the sharia contract.
303
Munifatussaidah, Zahara, and Zein (2024)
LITERATURE REVIEW
Previous Study and Hypothesis
Electronic Money Theory
Electronic money (e-money) is a transaction system in the banking world that uses
technology to make buying and selling activities easier, more efficient, shorter and more
precise. Another definition explains that e-money is a non-physical form of money that
stores the value of money in the form of digital data. This is why e-money can be used as
a substitute for cash payments replacing conventional or paper money, where it can be
used and distributed as a medium of exchange (Mufid, 2016; Nawawi, 2012; PBI, 2009).
According to Law no. 7 of 2011 concerning currency, money is defined as a legal
means of payment. It can be interpreted that money is a means of payment and when
money is issued by the government or competent authority, then money has the title of
currency. Electronic money or e-money meets these criteria as defined by electronic
money according to Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 18/17/PBI/2016 concerning Second
Amendment to PBI No.11/12/PBI/2009 concerning Electronic Money. Electronic money
can be interpreted as a digital form of the Rupiah currency.
This is because electronic money meets the elements needed for being a legal
means of payment (Bank Indonesia, 2016), as follows:
a. Issued on the basis of the value of the money paid in advance by the holder to the
issuer.
b. The value of money is stored electronically in a medium such as a server or chip.
c. Used as a means of payment to merchants who are not issuers of electronic money.
d. The value deposited by the holder and managed by the issuer is not a deposit as
intended in the law governing banking.
There are several important things that characterize electronic money, namely
that e-money can be divided into two types, namely chip-based and server-based e-
money. Chip-based e-money is the same as credit and debit cards but in its use, e-money
does not require an account for transaction activities. The chip used in this type of
electronic money is usually embedded in a card. This e-money is stored in digital format
on a microchip in the card and the amount is the same as that deposited by the user (Bank
Indonesia, 2016).
Chip-based electronic money is the same as paper money, only different in terms
of physical form. Server-based e-money, known as an e-wallet or digital wallet, has the
same function as a means of payment, making it easier for users to carry out buying and
selling transactions.
305
Munifatussaidah, Zahara, and Zein (2024)
Sharia Conventional
Halal certified by DSN MUI, LinkAja Syariah Not certified
Balance promotions use a nominal form, not Balance promotions use a form of rates or
percentages percentages, so they have the potential to cause
gharar (uncertainty)
The source of funds for sharia promotional prizes does The origin of the cashback or source of the
not come from consumer balances, but from the funds is not explained
publisher's promotional budget and/or from merchants
Scheme of sharia principles/contracts Does not consider sharia contracts
Partnered with merchants who sell halal products Not considering partners
Source: (Solihin, 2021; Syifa et al., 2022).
RESEARCH METHODS
This article was prepared using the library research method to answer questions
and formulate problems, specifically collecting data, and then compiling, clarifying and
studying the main problem (Zed, 2014). This was followed by explaining it through the
literature related to the topic of digital wallet transaction dynamics in Islamic economics
using a normative approach and Islamic law, as well as descriptive analysis techniques.
Descriptive analysis was done by presenting the data that had been collected and
arranged systematically (Ghozali, 2013; Yin, 2011). The data and information used came
from the previous research examining e-wallet law according to Islamic law, as well as
several literary sources containing the opinions of several ulama. This was followed by
comparing them with the fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council as an update to the
previous literature. The data search was carried out on the database Google Scholar using
the keywords e-wallet, digital wallet, electronic money, MUI, sharia, Islamic law. The MUI
DSN Fatwa, Al-Qur'an verses, hadith, fiqh rules, and Bank Indonesia’s regulations were
used in the analysis.
“O you who have believed, do not consume one another’s wealth unjustly but
only [in lawful] business by mutual consent....” Q.S. An Nisa verse 29
(Kementerian Agama, 2014).
طانُ ِمنَ ْال َم ِس ۚ َٰذَلِكَ ِبأَنَّ ُه ْم َ ش ْي ُ َّالر َبا َل َيقُو ُمونَ ِإ َّل َك َما َيقُو ُم ا َّلذِي َيتَ َخب
َّ طهُ ال ِ َا َّلذِينَ َيأ ْ ُكلُون
ظة ِم ْن َر ِب ِه ِ ّللاُ ْال َب ْي َع َو َح َّر َم
َ الر َبا ۚ فَ َم ْن َجا َءهُ َم ْو ِع ِ قَالُوا ِإنَّ َما ْال َب ْي ُع ِمثْ ُل
َّ الر َبا ۗ َوأَ َح َّل
َار ۖ ُه ْم ِفي َها خَا ِلدُون ِ َّاب الن
ُ ص َح ْ َعا َد فَأُو َٰلَئِكَ أ
َ ّللا ۖ َو َم ْن ِ َّ ف َوأَ ْم ُرهُ ِإلَى
َ َسل َ فَا ْنتَ َه َٰى فَلَهُ َما
“Those who consume interest cannot stand [on the Day of Resurrection] except
as one stands who is being beaten by Satan into insanity. That is because they
say, “Trade is [just] like interest.” But Allah has permitted trade and has
forbidden interest. So whoever has received an admonition from his Lord and
desists may have what is past, and his affair rests with Allah. But whoever
returns to [dealing in interest or usury] – those are the companions of the Fire;
307
Munifatussaidah, Zahara, and Zein (2024)
they will abide eternally therein.”. Q.S. Al-Baqarah verse 275. (Kementerian
Agama, 2014)
From the argument of the Qur'an above, humans are allowed to make peace in the
economic sector, so long as it is done in the right way and not done in the wrong way
according to the sharia, based on mutual pleasure.
This argument for muamalah is also strengthened by the Hadith of Rasulullah SAW,
narrated by the Hadith of the Prophet, narrated by Muslim, Abu Daud, Tirmizi, Nasati, and
Ibn Majah, Muslim from 'Ubadah bin Shamit: (DSN-MUI, 2017).
(Buying and selling/exchanging) gold for gold, silver for silver, wheat for wheat,
sya'ir for sya'ir, dates for dates, and salt for salt (required to be in the same size)
of the same (if exchanged) of one kind and (must be) in cash. If it is a different
type, sell it as you wish if done in cash.
From the hadith above, it explains bartering and how to simplify the buying and
selling process using gold and silver as a medium of exchange. As the gold and silver era
has progressed, paper money has replaced it as a means of exchange, making the buying
and selling process easier.
Hadith of the Prophet narrated by Muslim from Abu Sa'id al-Khudri: (DSN-MUI, 2017)
Do not sell gold for gold unless it is the same (in size) and do not add one part
to another; do not sell silver for silver unless it is the same (in size) and do not
add one part to another; and do not sell gold and silver that is not cash for cash.
Hadith of the Prophet narrated by Abu Daud and Tirmidhi: (DSN-MUI, 2017)
Fulfill your trust (trust) to those who are entitled to receive it and do not betray
those who betray you.
Hadith of the Prophet narrated by Ibn Majah and narrated by al-Hakim and alDar al-
Quthni from Abu Sa'id al-Khudriy r.a.: (DSN-MUI, 2017)
You must not endanger/harm other people and you must not (also) respond to
danger (losses caused by others) with danger (actions that harm them).
It is confirmed by the rules of fiqh that muamalah with digital wallets is permissible
and halal so long as it meets sharia principles, and there are no arguments that make it
haram.
Basically, all forms of muamalah are permitted unless there is an argument that
prohibits it or eliminates its permissibilit. (DSN-MUI, 2017)
“If society allowed money to be made from leather and used as a medium of
exchange, I would definitely forbid leather money from being exchanged for
gold and silver without cash”
Everything that can be bought and sold can be used as a means of payment,
and there is not a single text that states that money must be made of gold and
silver.
If studied based on istihsan, the use of digital wallets in the transaction process is
permitted. This is because digital wallets or server-based electronic money have the same
illat as gold and silver which can be used in the transaction process, with an explanation
according to (Musthofa, 2019; Rozalinda, 2016). Asl: gold and silver have been designated
in the hadith as a means of buying and selling or bartering in transactions. Far’u: electronic
money. Asl: it is permissible to use gold and silver as a medium of exchange in buying and
selling, or when engaged in barter transactions. Illat: the same function is used as a
medium of exchange. Therefore it can be concluded that buying and selling transactions
using server-based electronic money are permitted because of the greater benefit to
humans when using it. It does not deviate from the objectives of sharia and is categorized
in istihsan bi-qiyas khafi according to Al-Syarakhsyi in the Hanafi madzhab (Zuhri, 2019).
Because of the great benefits and demands of increasingly modern times, electronic
money is allowed to be used as a means of payment.
309
Munifatussaidah, Zahara, and Zein (2024)
Judging according to the principles of sharia economic law, digital wallets do not
conflict with the principles of sharia law. In fact, they provide benefits if used for halal
activities and to facilitate public transactions. The explanation of Islamic law was taken
into consideration by the national sharia council, the Indonesian Ulema Council, which
issued Fatwa No.166/DSN MUI/IX/2017 concerning Sharia Electronic Money (DSN MUI,
2017), Electronic money should be in accordance with sharia principles according to the
sharia contract mechanism. This DSN MUI fatwa is directly in response to the development
of e-wallet or server-based electronic money products by Bank Indonesia, because it
provides benefits. Apart from that, the distribution of e-wallets have gone through the
consideration of various state regulations and decisions, namely:
a. Law Number 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking.
b. Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2008
concerning the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law.
c. Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 20/6/PBI/2018 concerning Electronic Money.
d. Bank Indonesia Circular Letter Number 16/11/DKSP concerning the Implementation
of Electronic Money.
a. Wadiah or custody contracts are a money deposit agreement from the holder to the
issuer with the condition that the holder can take/withdraw/use the payment for
services on a digital wallet. The contract is permitted so long as there is no addition
to the balance, interest, etc.
b. Qardh is a loan agreement from the holder to the e-wallet issuer with the condition
that the issuer is obliged to return the money received to the holder. If there is a
discount received by the holder, it is called usury. The substance of the digital wallet
top-up transaction is a qard (loan), according to Dr. Erwandi Tarmizi.
c. The al-Ijarah al-Maushufah fi al-Dzimmah is an ijarah contract in the form of bai salam
(buying and selling orders), with a payment system at the beginning, then the benefits
are obtained afterwards. In this contract, publishers are allowed to provide
promotions in the form of discounts as gifts. Digital wallet top-up transactions using
this contract were proposed by Dr. Oni Sahroni, MA.
d. Sharf is a contract for exchanging similar money when topping-up balances, between
rupiah in different forms, and when exchanging paper money with electronic money
so then the substance is a top-up. Sharf contracts for the purpose of e-wallet balance
top-up transactions are in line with the views of Yusuf Bin Abdullah al-Syubaili.
As explained by the four contracts, according to the DSN MUI fatwa on Sharia
Electronic Money, a sharia contract is appropriate for current e-wallet top-up transactions
and two contracts are possible, namely wadiah (custody) and qardh (loan).
311
Munifatussaidah, Zahara, and Zein (2024)
1. Wadiah (Custody)
The practice of using an e-wallet can be said to be a custody (wadiah) in accordance
with sharia, so long as it does not include paylater, discounts, cashback and point features,
meaning that they are only used for their function, namely as an electronic wallet or
storage area.
In fiqh, the principle of savings is known as the wadiah principle, which can be
interpreted as a pure saving from one party to another party, either as an individual or a
legal entity. It must be safeguarded and returned whenever the owner of the fund wishes.
According to a number of scholars, there are four pillars of the wadi'ah contract, namely
the two contracting parties (the owner of the fund and the entrusted person), the goods
entrusted, and the shighah contract (consent and qabul). In electronic money
transactions, the two contracting parties are the issuer and the user, then the deposited
item (contract object) is the money that the user deposits with the issuer. The contract is
the agreement of each party to the contract (Hadikusuma, 2021; Solihin, 2021).
There was a review of muamalah jurisprudence regarding e-wallet practices with
wadi'ah contracts. Customers deposit money or add a balance to an e-wallet account for
any purpose. The e-wallet issuers become entrusted parties and consciously provide
deposit facilities to facilitate customer transactions. Profits are then obtained from the
service providers and top-up admin fees (Izzan & Piandi, 2022).
The review of DSN MUI fatwa Number 116/DSN-MUI/IX/2017 regarding e-wallet
as a wadiah contract states it should not include the element of usury. However, in the
MUI Fatwa provisions, there are several points that need to be reviewed and do not
comply with the MUI Fatwa, such as e-wallet funds not being deposited in sharia banks.
There needs to be a detailed explanation such as on the discounts, cashback and points
given by the merchant because these three things are not explained in detail. Because
they are not in accordance with the MUI Fatwa, they are not allowed (DSN MUI, 2017).
2. Qardh (Loan)
Muamalah fiqh is the reviewing of e-wallet practices with qardh (loan) contracts.
If the e-wallet consumer funds entrusted to them are used to make a profit, the wadiah
contract changes to qardh. A qardh contract is a gift of property to another person that
can be claimed or asked to be given back. In the fiqh literature, qardh is categorized as
aqad tathawwu'i or a mutual aid agreement, and is not a commercial transaction. If the e-
wallet funds are used specifically by the e-wallet issuer, when they receive a discount, they
may not be used because of usury. Users may not receive any benefits from the e-wallet.
The consumer funds (float funds) stored in e-wallets are held in sharia banks (Hadikusuma,
2021; Solihin, 2021), as per Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 23/6/PBI/2021 concerning
Payment Service Providers.
All products provided on the marketplace are halal products (for consumers, only
using the e-wallet to buy halal products). All discounts, cashback and free shipping are
given by the merchant. Based on DSN-MUI Fatwa Number 116/DSN-MUI/IX/2017
concerning Sharia Electronic Money, e-wallets cannot be used if the nominal amount of
the electronic money that is with the issuer is not placed in a sharia bank, as in the fatwa
it is stated that it must be placed in a bank that adheres to sharia.
The way to differentiate between a wadi'ah contract and a qardh contract is that
the qardh contract is a loan, so the funds must be returned even if the borrower
experiences a loss, while the wadi'ah contract is a trust. If at any time a loss or damage
occurs not due to the negligence of the entrusted, then the party entrusted is not obliged
to compensate. If electronic money storage is not used by the recipient (issuer) of the e-
wallet, then the contract is wadiah. If the electronic money is used by the issuer with the
permission of the card holder, then the contract which was initially a custody (wadiah)
changes to a loan contract (qardh), where the responsibility of the recipient of wadiah is
the same as the responsibility in the qardh contract. By knowing these two characteristics,
we can know that if an e-wallet is used only to store money and is used only for payments,
then it is permissible (halal). However, if we take advantage of the e-wallet platform, then
it becomes haram, because the benefits we receive are usurious (Ardiningrum et al., 2022;
Hadikusuma, 2021; Izzan & Piandi, 2022; Solihin, 2021).
As explained above and taking into account the opinions of ulama and the DSN
MUI fatwa, the fiqh approach to topping up the digital wallet balance is more accurately
referred to as a wadi'ah contract compared to a qardh contract. This is because the
characteristic of wadi'ah is that goods are entrusted. It can be taken at any time and the
storage period does not have to be stated. Terminologically, the qardh contract is giving
property to someone who will use it and return it at a later date.
Reward or Gift (Cashback) for Digital Wallet Transactions according to the Sharia
Agreement
Cashback is a form of reward given by the e-wallet issuer to users when using the
e-wallet as a means of payment in a transaction. To examine how Islamic law views the
cashback system, we will first explain how Islam views the law of giving gifts. Gift or reward
or hadiah (in Indonesian) comes from the words hadi and ya. Its meaning revolves around
two things. First, the word ‘hadi’ means guide. Second, it should be conveyed gently. From
here, the word guidance was born, which is the delivery of something gently to show
sympathy. Gifts are often also called grants. There are those who say that prizes include
various types of grant. According to Islamic law, gifts are categorized in the form of grants
and mubah (Ardiningrum et al., 2022; Ismail et al., 2018; Syifa et al., 2022).
313
Munifatussaidah, Zahara, and Zein (2024)
In this sense, gifts are not purely given without reward but have a specific purpose,
namely to connect ties, to bring relationships closer, and to bring glory. If understood,
there is a meeting point between the three definitions above, in that a gift is a gift without
compensation, the same as a grant. Sayyid Sabiq considers grants and gifts to be exactly
the same, while Zakariyya Al-Ansari differentiates them. Grants are purely gifts without
compensation, while gifts aim to glorify. However, the majority of Islamic jurisprudence
scholars tend to distinguish between grants and gifts. The law on giving gifts is Sunnah,
and so they are permissible (Ardiningrum et al., 2022).
In connection with the issue of gifts related to using digital wallets, based on the
DSN MUI fatwa Number 86/DSN-MUI/XII/2012 concerning Gifts in Fundraising for Sharia
Financial Institutions, it is permissible to give gifts in wadi'ah contracts at sharia banks with
the provision that the gift must be in the form of tangible objects and that the source of
the gift comes from a sharia bank, and not from customer funds (DSN-MUI, 2012).
As explained in the fatwa, the majority of fiqh scholars consider that if viewed
based on muamalah fiqh, giving gifts to e-wallets can be permitted and it is agreed that
the gift scheme is the same as a sales contract. Jualah is a promise or commitment to
provide certain rewards to achieve the specified results from a work. In this case, e-wallet
prizes in the form of cashback, discounts, free shipping, promos and others are a form of
gift given by the e-wallet issuer as a borrower to consumers for their kindness as a lender.
According to Dr. Oni Sahroni, MA, cashback gifts are allowed provided they are not
interest-bearing loans and there is clarity regarding the price of the goods being bought
and sold. If the cashback is provided by the e-wallet issuer using the Qardh principle, it is
called usury. This is permissible if the issuer uses the wadiah principle. Cashback is given
without conditions and not from the e-wallet user’s funds. As the correct explanation of
the contract in the e-wallet balance top-up transaction is the wadiah contract, it can be
concluded that the prize (cashback) obtained from the digital wallet balance top-up
transaction is permissible because it includes gifts that are not required at the beginning
of the usage agreement (Izzan & Piandi, 2022).
Then there is the issue of e-wallet vouchers, although this has not been discussed
in the MUI fatwa. However, it can be linked to fatwa 86/DSN-MUI/XII/2012 concerning
Prizes in Fundraising for Sharia Financial Institutions (DSN-MUI, 2012). Vouchers are a type
of transaction with a certain value and can only be exchanged for certain reasons or
certain goods. According to several sources, it is explained that shopping using vouchers
available in e-wallets is permitted, provided that the vouchers are used to buy goods that
meet your needs and are also halal. The next thing you need to pay attention to is the
event of the voucher, such as if the voucher is issued to liven things up.
Transactions with vouchers are also permissible on Islamic terms if the voucher is
not obtained by the consumer because they paid dues to the shop that issued the voucher.
Unless the voucher is given to consumers because they have paid contributions every
month, it is feared that this will be uncertain and not permitted according to Islamic
jurisprudence. As a voucher user, it is hoped that they will be able to use the voucher for
useful things and that no party will feel disadvantaged (Ardiningrum et al., 2022; Izzan &
Piandi, 2022).
Vouchers have several categories, such as cashback vouchers, discount vouchers,
and free shipping vouchers. These types of vouchers are provided by the e-wallet with the
aim of attracting consumer interest. The strongest opinion from the ulama states that
cashback vouchers, discounts or free shipping are allowed if consumers don't have to give
a deposit, points or be a member of an e-wallet company to get them. On the other hand,
if a discount, cashback or free shipping voucher requires consumers to have a certain
amount of points or they must make a deposit first to get the cashback, discount or free
shipping promo, then this is not permitted in Islam. This is because it is the same as saving
on the e-commerce wallet and entering into an agreement with the e-wallet, and this can
be called usury. It would be better to always be alert during every transaction because
there are contracts that need to be considered in order to avoid unwanted things
(Abdulfattah & Kurniawan, 2018; Ardiningrum et al., 2022; Solihin, 2021; Syifa et al., 2022).
CONCLUSION
E-wallets are a type of financial technology that has the function of storing funds and can
be used to facilitate transactions. A review of Islamic law and the fatwas on the dynamics of digital
wallets have been regulated by the DSN MUI fatwa on sharia electronic money. They are
permitted under certain conditions such as the purpose of the payment instrument and floating
funds being kept by the sharia issuer/bank, and are not for consumptive activities.
According to fiqh experts, the sharia contract mechanism for transactions via digital
wallets can use wadiah, qardh, al-Ijarah al-Maushufah fi al-Dzimmah, or sharf contracts.
Reviewing Islamic law, digital wallet balance top-up transactions are more accurately referred to
as wadiah contracts compared to qardh contracts, as explained by the MUI DSN fatwa on sharia
electronic money. This is because the characteristic of wadiah is that the goods deposited can be
taken at any time. The correct agreement between the two is the wadiah contract, and the
balance top-up transaction on a digital wallet is more appropriate as a deposit from the holder to
the issuer.
A review of Islamic law on the use of rewards (cashback) from digital wallet transactions
found that giving rewards to e-wallets can be permitted, and it is agreed that a reward scheme is
the same as a sales contract. Therefore e-wallet rewards, whether in the form of cashback,
315
Munifatussaidah, Zahara, and Zein (2024)
discounts, free shipping, promos and others, are a form of gift given by the e-wallet issuer as a
borrower to consumers for their kindness as a lender.
REFERENCES
317