Preprint servers
[edit]
Main article: Preprint
Preprint Servers come in many varieties, but the standard traits across them are stable: they seek to
create a quick, free mode of communicating scientific knowledge to the public. Preprint servers act as
a venue to quickly disseminate research and vary on their policies concerning when articles may be
submitted relative to journal acceptance.[124][125] Also typical of preprint servers is their lack of a peer-
review process – typically, preprint servers have some type of quality check in place to ensure a
minimum standard of publication, but this mechanism is not the same as a peer-review mechanism.
Some preprint servers have explicitly partnered with the broader open science movement. [126] Preprint
servers can offer service similar to those of journals,[127] and Google Scholar indexes many preprint
servers and collects information about citations to preprints.[128] The case for preprint servers is often
made based on the slow pace of conventional publication formats.[129] The motivation to start
SocArXiv, an open-access preprint server for social science research, is the claim that valuable research
being published in traditional venues often takes several months to years to get published, which
slows down the process of science significantly. Another argument made in favor of preprint servers
like SocArXiv is the quality and quickness of feedback offered to scientists on their pre-published
work.[130] The founders of SocArXiv claim that their platform allows researchers to gain easy feedback
from their colleagues on the platform, thereby allowing scientists to develop their work into the
highest possible quality before formal publication and circulation. The founders of SocArXiv further
claim that their platform affords the authors the greatest level of flexibility in updating and editing
their work to ensure that the latest version is available for rapid dissemination. The founders claim
that this is not traditionally the case with formal journals, which instate formal procedures to make
updates to published articles[citation needed]. Perhaps the strongest advantage of some preprint servers is
their seamless compatibility with Open Science software such as the Open Science Framework. The
founders of SocArXiv claim that their preprint server connects all aspects of the research life cycle in
OSF with the article being published on the preprint server. According to the founders, this allows for
greater transparency and minimal work on the authors' part.[126]
One criticism of pre-print servers is their potential to foster a culture of plagiarism. For example, the
popular physics preprint server ArXiv had to withdraw 22 papers when it came to light that they were
plagiarized. In June 2002, a high-energy physicist in Japan was contacted by a man called Ramy
Naboulsi, a non-institutionally affiliated mathematical physicist. Naboulsi requested Watanabe to
upload his papers on ArXiv as he was not able to do so, because of his lack of an institutional
affiliation. Later, the papers were realized to have been copied from the proceedings of a physics
conference.[131] Preprint servers are increasingly developing measures to circumvent this plagiarism
problem. In developing nations like India and China, explicit measures are being taken to combat it.
[132]
These measures usually involve creating some type of central repository for all available pre-prints,
allowing the use of traditional plagiarism detecting algorithms to detect the fraud [citation needed].
Nonetheless, this is a pressing issue in the discussion of pre-print servers, and consequently for open
science.