0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views10 pages

Statistical Analysis Problem Sets

The document outlines various statistical analyses including Pearson R, Partial Correlation, Point-Biserial Correlation, Spearman’s Rank Correlation, and t-Tests, each with hypotheses, decisions based on p-values, and results reporting. Key findings include strong correlations between physical activity and BMI, mental health scores, and employee productivity before and after training, as well as significant differences in weight loss among different programs. The results indicate that physical activity and training programs have notable impacts on health and productivity outcomes.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views10 pages

Statistical Analysis Problem Sets

The document outlines various statistical analyses including Pearson R, Partial Correlation, Point-Biserial Correlation, Spearman’s Rank Correlation, and t-Tests, each with hypotheses, decisions based on p-values, and results reporting. Key findings include strong correlations between physical activity and BMI, mental health scores, and employee productivity before and after training, as well as significant differences in weight loss among different programs. The results indicate that physical activity and training programs have notable impacts on health and productivity outcomes.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Monday, R-jay A.

BSED SCIENCE 3A
PROBLEM SETS IN STATISTICS

1. Pearson R

A. Stating Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis


Ho: There is no relationship between physical activity and BMI.
H1: There is relationship between physical activity and BMI.

B. Decision
If the p-value is < .05 (significance level), Reject the Null Hypothesis.
If the p-value is > .05 (significance level), Do not Reject the Null Hypothesis.
C. Reporting/Analyzing Results

The r-value of the data is -0.996


and the p-value is <.001. we will
reject the Ho and accept the H1.
There is strong negative
correlation between the two
variables. means that as
physical activity increases,
BMI decreases.
2. Partial Correlation

A. Stating the Null hypothesis and Alternative hypotheses


Ho: The internet speed does not affect the relationship between social media use
and academic performance of 7 students.
H1: The internet speed does affect the relationship between social media use
and academic performance of 7 students.
B. Decision
If the p-value is < .05 (significance level), Reject the Null Hypothesis
If the p-value is > .05 (significance level), Do not Reject the Null Hypothesis
C. Reporting/Analyzing the Results

Relationship for each pair of variables:


Rxy = -0.991 (correlation coefficient between social media use and academic
performance)
Rxz = -0.471 (correlation coefficient between social media use and internet
speed) Ryz = 0.388 (correlation coefficient between academic performance and
internet speed)
3. Point-Biserial Correlation

A. Stating Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis


Ho: There is no association between smoking status and lung capacity.
H1: There is an association between smoking status and lung capacity.

B. Decision
If the p-value is < .05 (significance level), Reject the Null Hypothesis.
If the p-value is > .05 (significance level), Do not Reject the Null Hypothesis.

C. Reporting/Analyzing Results
The two variables have a moderately
strong, negative association. This
implies that smokers tend to have
lower lung capacity than non-smokers.
This finding is consistent with the
known health effects of smoking on the
respiratory system. The r2 is (the.946)2
= 0.89. This indicates that 89% fewer
errors are made when predicting the
Lung capacity from the Smoking status

4. Spearman’s Rank Correlation (Spearman Rho)


A. Stating Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis

Ho: There is no correlation between physical activity and mental health score.

H1: There is correlation between physical activity and mental health score.

B. Decision
If the p-value is < .05 (significance level), Reject the Null Hypothesis.
If the p-value is > .05 (significance level), Do not Reject the Null Hypothesis.

C. Reporting/Analyzing Results

The correlation coefficient (r = 0.987) indicates a strong positive linear


association between physical activity and mental health score.

This means that as physical activity increases, mental health score tends to
increase as well.

The correlation coefficient is statistically significant, suggesting that the


observed relationship is unlikely to be due to chance.
5. Dependent (Paired-Samples) t-Test

A. Stating Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis


Ho: There is no correlation between employee productivity before and after the
training program.
H1: There is a positive correlation between employee productivity before and
after the training program.

B. Decision
If the p-value is < .05 (significance level), Reject the Null Hypothesis.
If the p-value is > .05 (significance level), Do not Reject the Null Hypothesis.

C. Reporting/Analyzing Results
The correlation coefficient (r = 0.986) indicates a very strong positive linear
association between employee productivity before and after the training
program.

This means that employees who were more productive before the training
program tended to be more productive after the training program as well.

The correlation coefficient is statistically significant, suggesting that the observed


relationship is unlikely to be due to chance.
6. Independent t-Test

A. Stating Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis


Ho: There is no correlation between employee productivity before and after the
training program.
H1: There is a positive correlation between employee productivity before and
after the training program.

B. Decision
If the p-value is < .05 (significance level), Reject the Null Hypothesis.
If the p-value is > .05 (significance level), Do not Reject the Null Hypothesis

C. Reporting/Analyzing Results

The correlation coefficient (r = 0.986)


indicates a very strong positive linear
association between employee productivity
before and after the training program.

This means that employees who were more


productive before the training program
tended to be more productive after the
training program as well.
7. One-Way ANOVA

A. Stating Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis

Null hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in weight loss among the
three programs.

Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a significant difference in weight loss among


the three programs.
B. Decision
If the p-value is < .05 (significance level), Reject the Null Hypothesis.
If the p-value is > .05 (significance level), Do not Reject the Null Hypothesis.

C. Reporting/AnalyzingThe Results

F-statistic (F = 59.3) is significantly larger than 1, indicating that the


variance between the groups is significantly greater than the variance
within the groups.
The p-value (p < 0.001) is less than the significance level (α = 0.05),
indicating that the results are statistically significant.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Dependent t-tests are used when comparing related samples, such as measuring changes in the same employees' productivity before and after a training program . In contrast, independent t-tests compare means between two unrelated groups, like assessing productivity differences between two separate employee groups. The choice depends on whether the data involves paired observations or independent samples. Factors influencing this choice include the study design, sample pairing, and research objectives. In scenarios requiring an evaluation of internal program effectiveness, a dependent t-test is preferable. However, assessing program comparisons across separate groups aligns with the independent t-test usage .

The paired-samples t-test analysis revealed a very strong positive linear association (r = 0.986) between employee productivity before and after the training, implying that those who were more productive before continued to be more productive afterward . The significant correlation coefficient indicates the observed changes are unlikely due to chance, thereby demonstrating the training program's effectiveness in consistently enhancing productivity .

Spearman's Rank Correlation of r = 0.987 suggests a strong positive linear relationship between physical activity and mental health score, indicating that increased physical activity is associated with higher mental health scores . The statistically significant result implies that the positive association observed is unlikely to be due to random chance .

P-values play a crucial role in hypothesis testing by indicating the probability of observing statistical results under the null hypothesis. Across analyses like Pearson's correlation, ANOVA, and t-tests, a p-value below the 0.05 threshold typically leads to rejecting the null hypothesis, asserting the presence of significant effects or associations . Conversely, a p-value above 0.05 suggests insufficient evidence to dismiss the null, highlighting its impact in guiding scientifically supported decisions . This threshold acts as a critical discriminator in validating or refuting hypotheses based on statistical evidence .

Pearson's correlation coefficient determined in the analysis (r = -0.996) indicates a very strong negative relationship between physical activity and BMI, suggesting that as physical activity increases, BMI decreases . If the p-value is <0.05, the null hypothesis (no relationship) would be rejected, confirming the alternative hypothesis of a relationship .

The point-biserial correlation indicates a moderately strong negative association between smoking status and lung capacity, showing that smokers tend to have lower lung capacity than non-smokers . The point-biserial correlation squared (r² = 0.89) suggests that 89% of the variance in lung capacity can be explained by smoking status, highlighting the significant impact of smoking on lung function, corroborating known respiratory health effects .

Correlation coefficients derived from tests such as Pearson's, Spearman's rank, and point-biserial offer insights into the strengths and directions of relationships between variables, which can guide practical decisions. For instance, understanding the negative relationship between physical activity and BMI can inform public health strategies . Similarly, the negative correlation between social media and academic performance can help devise better educational policies to improve student outcomes . These coefficients provide evidence-based support for interventions by elucidating underlying statistical associations confirmed through significant p-values .

The one-way ANOVA results, with an F-statistic of 59.3, show that variance between the groups significantly exceeds that within the groups, indicating differences in weight loss efficacy among them . The p-value (<0.001) being less than the 0.05 significance level leads to rejecting the null hypothesis, concluding statistically significant weight loss differences exist among the programs .

The point-biserial correlation provides a statistical measure to assess the association between a binary variable (smoking status) and a continuous variable (lung capacity). The correlation results demonstrate a negatively moderate association, corroborating findings that smoking negatively impacts respiratory health by significantly reducing lung capacity . This statistical approach effectively quantifies the proportion of variance in lung capacity attributable to smoking status (r² = 0.89), reinforcing public health campaigns against smoking .

The analysis investigates whether internet speed affects the correlation between social media use and academic performance . The correlation between social media use and academic performance (r = -0.991) suggests a strong negative correlation, whereas the correlation between social media use and internet speed (r = -0.471) and between academic performance and internet speed (r = 0.388) are weaker. This implies that internet speed has a moderating effect on the relationship between social media use and academic performance .

You might also like