Understanding Syncope: Causes and Diagnosis
Understanding Syncope: Causes and Diagnosis
Differential Diagnosis
Max Bayard, MD;Fereshteh Gerayli, MD;and James Holt, MD
East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee
Syncope is an abrupt, transient, and complete loss of consciousness associated with an inability to maintain postural tone;
recovery is rapid and spontaneous. The condition is common, resulting in about 1.7 million emergency department visits in
2019. The immediate cause of syncope is cerebral hypoperfusion, which may occur due to systemic vasodilation, decreased
cardiac output, or both. The primary classifications of syncope are cardiac, reflex (neurogenic), and orthostatic. Evaluation
focuses on history, physical examination (including orthostatic blood pressure measurements), and electrocardiographic
results. If the findings are inconclusive and indicate possible adverse outcomes, additional testing may be considered.
However, testing has limited utility, except in patients with cardiac syncope. Prolonged electrocardiographic monitoring,
stress testing, and echocardiography may be beneficial in patients at higher risk of adverse outcomes from cardiac syncope.
Neuroimaging should be ordered only when findings suggest a neurologic event or a head injury is suspected. Laboratory
tests may be ordered based on history and physical examination findings (e.g., hemoglobin measurement if gastrointestinal
bleeding is suspected). Patients are designated as having lower or higher risk of adverse outcomes according to history,
physical examination, and electrocardiographic results, which can inform decisions regarding hospital admission. Risk
stratification tools, such as the Canadian Syncope Risk Score, may be beneficial in this decision;some tools include cardiac
biomarkers as a component. The prognosis of patients with reflex and orthostatic syncope is good;cardiac syncope is more
likely to be associated with adverse outcomes. (Am Fam Physician. 2023;108(5):454-463. Copyright © 2023 American Acad-
emy of Family Physicians.)
Syncope is an abrupt, transient, and complete evaluated for syncope in emergency departments
loss of consciousness associated with an inability were admitted, and 10% were given observa-
to maintain postural tone;recovery is rapid and tion status.4
spontaneous. The definition of syncope does not
include loss of consciousness caused by other con- Pathophysiology
ditions, such as seizures or head trauma. Presyn- The immediate cause of loss of consciousness in a
cope refers to the symptoms that occur before an syncopal episode is cerebral hypoperfusion. The
episode of syncope, such as graying out or tunnel two primary mechanisms of this hypoperfusion
vision;these symptoms may progress to syncope are systemic vasodilation and decreased car-
or resolve without total loss of consciousness.1 diac output. Either, or both, can lead to syncope.
Syncope is a common symptom that results Systemic vasodilation may be due to autonomic
in substantial use of health care resources and nervous system dysfunction, excessive response
expenses. The lifetime incidence of syncope is to various stimuli (e.g., emotion, position, other
reported to range between 19% and 41%, and it triggers), and medication. Decreased cardiac out-
is more prevalent with advanced age and female put may be caused by intrinsic heart disease (e.g.,
sex.1,2 Syncope was the cause of 1.7 million U.S. coronary artery disease, heart failure, valvular
emergency department visits in 2019, or 1.1% of disease), or it may be secondary to hypovolemia,
all such visits.3 As of 2014, 25% of individuals orthostatic hypotension, or neurally mediated
bradycardia (as in vasovagal syncope).
CME This clinical content conforms to AAFP cri-
Differential Diagnosis
teria for CME. See CME Quiz on page 447.
Author disclosure: No relevant financial
Syncope must be distinguished from other
relationships. nontraumatic conditions that lead to transient
loss of consciousness. These include seizures,
454 American
Downloaded Family
from the Physician
American Family Physician website at [Link]/afp. © 2023 American Academy
Copyright
[Link]/afp of Family
Volume 108, Physicians.
Number 5For November
the private, non-
◆ 2023
commercial use of one individual user of the website. All other rights reserved. Contact copyrights@[Link] for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en University of Guadalajara de [Link] por Elsevier en enero 01, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SYNCOPE
SORT:KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE
Evidence
Clinical recommendation rating Comments
History, physical examination (including orthostatic blood C Consensus guidelines
pressure), and electrocardiographic results should be obtained
in individuals presenting with syncope.1,5
Neurologic imaging, including carotid ultrasonography and B Expert opinion and systematic review of
computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the observational studies showing lack of patient
head, should not be ordered as part of the evaluation for syn- benefit
cope in the absence of neurologic signs or symptoms.1,27
Risk stratification scores may be used in the management of B Systematic reviews and validation studies
patients with syncope, but they have not been shown to be assessing adverse patient outcomes, but
superior to physician judgment.5,36-39 tools did not perform better than physician
judgment
A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-
oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to [Link] ww.
[Link]/afpsort.
November 2023 ◆ Volume 108, Number 5 [Link]/afp American Family Physician 455
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en University of Guadalajara de [Link] por Elsevier en enero 01, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SYNCOPE
TABLE 1
Classification of Syncope
Type of syncope Scenario Clinical features
Situational Occurs during or after defecation, urina- Absence of heart disease;patient has likely had previous
tion, or coughing, or after eating or exercise similar experiences
Vasovagal Inappropriate (nonphysiologic) vasodila- May have prodromal features, such as nausea, warmth,
tion and bradycardia;caused by fear, pain, or diaphoresis
noxious stimuli, heat, or stress
Valvular Aortic, mitral, or pulmonic stenosis Symptoms depend on severity;may cause heart
failure, exertional angina;murmur may be heard on
examination
Vascular (may be Acute myocardial infarction or ischemia Chest pain, diaphoresis, shortness of breath, onset with
associated with exertion
electrocardio-
graphic changes) Aortic dissection Hypotension or shock, severe sharp chest pain that
possibly radiates to the back
Drug-induced Numerous medications may cause vasodi- Recent initiation or increased dose of medications
lation or decreased cardiac output (consider anticholinergics, diuretics, antihypertensives,
dopaminergics, opiates, antipsychotics, sedatives, and
tricyclic antidepressants)
Postural ortho- Common in young adults;more common Severe orthostasis with marked tachycardia
static tachycardia in females
syndrome
Volume depletion Caused by poor oral intake, gastrointestinal History of blood or fluid loss;low blood pressure;ele-
losses, acute blood loss, and diuretics vated heart rate
456 American Family Physician [Link]/afp Volume 108, Number 5 ◆ November 2023
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en University of Guadalajara de [Link] por Elsevier en enero 01, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SYNCOPE
November 2023 ◆ Volume 108, Number 5 [Link]/afp American Family Physician 457
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en University of Guadalajara de [Link] por Elsevier en enero 01, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
TABLE 3 TABLE 4
Syncopal Findings Associated With Lower Higher-Risk ECG Findings in Patients With
and Higher Risk Syncope
Lower risk Higher risk ECG findings Significance
minutes. The patient stands, and the blood pressure and high-grade heart blocks, and ventricular and supraventricu-
pulse are checked within one minute and again at three lar tachyarrhythmias may be identified. Certain congenital
minutes. There is no consensus regarding additional inter- and acquired conditions that can cause syncope have recog-
vals at which to check blood pressure and heart rate. A nizable ECG abnormalities (Table 4).1,5,17
drop in systolic blood pressure of 20 mm Hg or more or a
drop in diastolic blood pressure of 10 mm Hg or more upon Further Evaluation
standing is diagnostic of orthostatic hypotension. Increased If the history, physical examination, and ECG findings do
heart rate is not necessary for diagnosis because this may not clearly identify the patient’s risk level for adverse out-
not occur in patients with autonomic dysfunction.5 Patients comes, further evaluation may be indicated. Although
with early-onset orthostatic hypotension, which occurs various additional tests are commonly ordered, many are
within 15 to 60 seconds of standing, may be at higher risk of performed without evidence of benefit in the evaluation of
adverse outcomes.16 syncope (Table 5).1,5,6,12,18-23
ECG findings may suggest a cardiogenic cause of syncope Overuse of testing and resources is common when eval-
and the need for further workup. Bradycardia, sinus pauses, uating patients with possible syncope. This was the focus of
458 American Family Physician [Link]/afp Volume 108, Number 5 ◆ November 2023
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en University of Guadalajara de [Link] por Elsevier en enero 01, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SYNCOPE
TABLE 5
Carotid ultra- Neurologic findings;otherwise, carotid Loss of consciousness not usually a symptom of transient
sonography imaging should not be performed ischemic attack associated with carotid stenosis;focal neuro-
logic signs and symptoms would be expected with transient
ischemic attack
Chest CT For patients with findings suggestive of Per systematic review, the prevalence of pulmonary embolism
angiography pulmonary embolism in patients with syncope is 0.8%;not certain whether pulmo-
nary embolism caused the syncope
Echocardiog- For patients with suspected structural Individuals at least 60 years of age with abnormal ECG results
raphy heart disease based on initial assessment or elevated B-type natriuretic peptide levels may benefit from
(can identify aortic stenosis, hypertrophic transthoracic echocardiography, which the American College
cardiomyopathy, pericardial tamponade, of Radiology recommends if clinical suspicion of cardiac eti-
aortic dissection, acute right ventricular ology based on history, physical examination, or ECG results
strain as seen in pulmonary embolism,
and other structural conditions)
Electroen- Suspected seizure Should not be ordered as part of the basic workup of syncope
cephalography but appropriate if seizure is suspected
Electrophysi- Asymptomatic sinus bradycardia (< 50 Should not be obtained in patients with syncope who have
ologic study beats per minute), bifascicular bundle normal ECG results and normal heart structure unless
branch block, and tachycardia;otherwise arrhythmic etiology is otherwise suspected
has only limited usefulness in the workup
of syncope
Head CT Only if intracranial disease is highly sus- CT and magnetic resonance imaging of the head have other-
pected as contributing to the syncope or wise not been shown to be of benefit in evaluation of syncope
there is suspicion of head trauma due to
syncope
Prolonged Demonstrated utility in diagnosing Currently a lack of sufficient evidence as to whether long-
ECG arrhythmias that may be the cause of term monitoring with implantable loop recorders decreases
monitoring syncope;duration of monitoring is mortality
partially dependent on the frequency of
syncopal episodes
Stress testing For patients who experience syncope Syncope during exercise is likely cardiac, whereas syncope
during or after exertion after exercise could be cardiac or reflex
Tilt table Should be considered in individuals when Tilt table testing may help differentiate syncope with abnor-
testing the initial evaluation does not provide mal movements from seizures;also may be beneficial to help
clear diagnosis of reflex syncope, ortho- patients recognize symptoms and learn physical maneuvers
static syncope, positional orthostatic
tachycardia syndrome, or psychogenic
pseudosyncope
November 2023 ◆ Volume 108, Number 5 [Link]/afp American Family Physician 459
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en University of Guadalajara de [Link] por Elsevier en enero 01, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SYNCOPE
a study in which 1,020 hospitalists were given a scenario of more than 12 hours had a higher sensitivity for identifying
textbook orthostatic hypotension:hydrochlorothiazide had arrhythmias than did shorter intervals. Following discharge, if
recently been added to a 59-year-old man’s blood pressure the cause of syncope remains unknown, and a cardiac cause is
regimen. He had a syncopal episode after standing and recov- still suspected, prolonged ECG monitoring is recommended.1
ered fully within two minutes. In the emergency department, Monitoring for 15 days showed greater sensitivity for identify-
orthostatic testing resulted in a drop in systolic blood pres- ing causative arrhythmias than did shorter intervals.26 Table 6
sure of 25 mm Hg, and ECG results were normal. Although shows ECG monitoring options for syncope.5,12,22,23
medication change and discharge would be appropriate, 83%
of respondents thought that further workup with additional IMAGING STUDIES
testing (admission, echocardiography, stress testing, or tilt Imaging studies are often ordered in the evaluation of syn-
table testing) would be performed at their institutions.24 cope but are seldom beneficial. Regarding computed tomog-
raphy of the head, numerous studies have demonstrated that
LABORATORY TESTING in the absence of head trauma or neurologic abnormalities,
Laboratory testing may be ordered based on the patient’s his- it provides almost no benefit, and despite the lack of benefit,
tory and physical examination findings. Examples include about 50% of patients presenting with syncope have com-
hemoglobin measurement due to a suspected hemorrhage, puted tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the
d-dimer assay if pulmonary embolism is considered, and head.27 A systematic review found that less than 0.1% of those
pregnancy test when warranted. B-type natriuretic peptide who had computed tomography of the head had findings that
and troponin levels should be considered if cardiac syncope explained the syncopal episode.28 In the absence of physical
is suspected;elevated results are associated with a higher risk examination findings consistent with symptomatic carotid
of adverse outcomes.5,25 stenosis, carotid ultrasonography is not recommended.1,18,29
460 American Family Physician [Link]/afp Volume 108, Number 5 ◆ November 2023
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en University of Guadalajara de [Link] por Elsevier en enero 01, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SYNCOPE
November 2023 ◆ Volume 108, Number 5 [Link]/afp American Family Physician 461
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en University of Guadalajara de [Link] por Elsevier en enero 01, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SYNCOPE
TABLE 7
462 American Family Physician [Link]/afp Volume 108, Number 5 ◆ November 2023
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en University of Guadalajara de [Link] por Elsevier en enero 01, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SYNCOPE
References 22. Solbiati M, et al. The diagnostic yield of implantable loop recorders in unex-
1. Shen WK, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and manage- plained syncope:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2017;
ment of patients with syncope:a report of the American College of Cardiol- 231:170-176.
ogy/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines 23. Solbiati M, et al. Implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic
and the Heart Rhythm Society [published correction appears in Circulation. workup for unexplained recurrent syncope. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2017;136(16):e271-e272]. Circulation. 2017;136(5):e60-e122. 2016;(4):CD011637.
2. Kenny RA, et al. Epidemiology of syncope/collapse in younger and older 24. Kachalia A, et al. Overuse of testing in preoperative evaluation and syncope:
Western patient populations. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;55(4):357-363. a survey of hospitalists. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(2):100-108.
3. Cairns C, et al. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey:2019 25. du Fay de Lavallaz J, et al.;BASEL IX Investigators. B-type natriuretic peptides
emergency department summary tables. April 7, 2022. Accessed October 4, and cardiac troponins for diagnosis and risk-stratification of syncope. Circu-
2022. [Link] lation. 2019;139(21):2403-2418.
4. Anderson TS, et al. Trends in hospitalization, readmission, and diagnostic 26. Solbiati M, et al. Predictive accuracy of electrocardiographic monitoring of
testing of patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope. patients with syncope in the emergency department:The SyMoNE Multi-
Ann Emerg Med. 2018;72(5):523-532. center Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(1):15-23.
5. Brignole M, et al.;ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC guidelines 27. Viau JA, et al. The yield of computed tomography of the head among
for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(21): patients presenting with syncope:a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med.
1883-1948. 2019;26(5):479-490.
6. Saal DP, et al. Classifying syncope. Auton Neurosci. 2014;184:3 -9. 28. Pournazari P, et al. Diagnostic value of neurological studies in diagnosing
7. Shmuely S, et al. Differentiating motor phenomena in tilt-induced syncope syncope:a systematic review. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(12):1604-1610.
and convulsive seizures. Neurology. 2018;90(15):e1339-e1346. 29. Scott JW, et al. Choosing wisely for syncope:low-value carotid ultrasound
8. Brignole M, et al.;ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC guidelines for use. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(4):e001063.
the diagnosis and management of syncope–supplementary data. Eur Heart 30. Puggioni E, et al. Results and complications of the carotid sinus massage per-
J. Accessed October 12, 2022. [Link] formed according to the “method of symptoms”. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89(5):
39/21/1883/4939241#supplementary-data 599-601.
9. Runser LA, et al. Syncope:evaluation and differential diagnosis. Am Fam Phy- 31. Ungar A, et al. Safety and tolerability of tilt testing and carotid sinus massage
sician. 2017;95(5):303-312. in the octogenarians. Age Ageing. 2016;45(2):242-248.
10. van Dijk N, et al. High diagnostic yield and accuracy of history, physical exam- 32. Kulkarni N, et al. Abolish the tilt table test for the workup of syncope! Circula-
ination, and ECG in patients with transient loss of consciousness in FAST:the tion. 2020;141(5):335-337.
fainting assessment study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19(1):48-55.
33. Sutton R, et al. Letter by Sutton et al regarding article, “Abolish the Tilt Table
11. Angus S. The cost-effective evaluation of syncope. Med Clin North Am. 2016; Test for the Workup of Syncope!”. Circulation. 2020;141(25):e944-e945.
100(5):1019-1032.
34. Solbiati M, et al. Outcomes in syncope research:a systematic review and
12. Sandhu RK, et al.;Primary Writing Committee. Canadian Cardiovascular critical appraisal. Intern Emerg Med. 2018;13(4):593-601.
Society clinical practice update on the assessment and management of syn-
35. Leafloor CW, et al. Long-term outcomes in syncope patients presenting to
cope. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36(8):1167-1177.
the emergency department:a systematic review. CJEM. 2020;22(1):45-55.
13. Costantino G, et al. Syncope clinical management in the emergency
36. Costantino G, et al. Syncope risk stratification tools vs clinical judgment:an
department:a consensus from the first international workshop on syncope
individual patient data meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2014;127(11):1126.e13-1126.
risk stratification in the emergency department. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(19):
e25.
1493-1498.
14. Akizuki H, et al. Heart rate variability in patients presenting with neurally medi- 37. Sweanor RAL, et al. Multivariable risk scores for predicting short-term out-
ated syncope in an emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(2): comes for emergency department patients with unexplained syncope:a sys-
211-216. tematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2021;28(5):502-510.
15. Alboni P, et al. Diagnostic value of history in patients with syncope with or 38. Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, et al. Multicenter emergency department
without heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(7):1921-1928. validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;
180(5):737-744.
16. Juraschek SP, et al. Association of history of dizziness and long-term adverse
outcomes with early vs later orthostatic hypotension assessment times in 39. Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, et al. Predicting short-term risk of arrhyth-
middle-aged adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(9):1316-1323. mia among patients with syncope:the Canadian Syncope Arrhythmia Risk
Score. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(11):1315-1326.
17. Nishijima DK, et al. ECG predictors of cardiac arrhythmias in older adults with
syncope. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(4):452-461.e3. 40. Solari D, et al. Stop vasodepressor drugs in reflex syncope:a randomised
controlled trial. Heart. 2017;103(6):449-455.
18. Kligerman SJ, et al.;Expert Panels on Cardiac Imaging and Neurological
Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® syncope. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021; 41. Sheldon R, et al.;POST 4 investigators. Midodrine for the prevention of
18(5S):S229-S238. vasovagal syncope:a randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 2021;
174(10):1 349-1356.
19. Thijs RD, et al. Recommendations for tilt table testing and other provocative
cardiovascular autonomic tests in conditions that may cause transient loss of 42. Flevari P, et al. Fluoxetine vs. placebo for the treatment of recurrent vasovagal
consciousness:consensus statement of the European Federation of Auto- syncope with anxiety sensitivity. Europace. 2017;19(1):127-131.
nomic Societies (EFAS) endorsed by the American Autonomic Society (AAS) 43. Brignole M, et al.;BioSync CLS trial investigators. Cardiac pacing in severe
and the European Academy of Neurology (EAN). Clin Auton Res. 2021;31(3): recurrent reflex syncope and tilt-induced asystole. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):
369-384. 508-516.
20. Han SK, et al. Transthoracic echocardiogram in syncope patients with nor- 44. Gauer RL. Evaluation of syncope. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(6):640-650.
mal initial evaluation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(2):281-284. 45. Miller TH, et al. Evaluation of syncope [published correction appears
21. Oqab Z, et al. Prevalence of pulmonary embolism in patients presenting with in Am Fam Physician. 2006;73(5):7 76]. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72(8):
syncope. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2018; 1492-1500.
36(4):551-555.
November 2023 ◆ Volume 108, Number 5 [Link]/afp American Family Physician 463
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en University of Guadalajara de [Link] por Elsevier en enero 01, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.