See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: [Link]

net/publication/356429539

A qualitative perspective on behavioural biases affecting investment decisions

of stock market investors.

Article · August 2021

CITATIONS READS

0 416

2 authors, including:

Santosha Kumar Mallick

Utkal University
21 PUBLICATIONS 27 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Santosha Kumar Mallick on 22 November 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 A qualitative perspective on behavioural biases affecting investment decisions of stock market
investors
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI)
Volume 12, Issue 9, August 2021: 3503-3509

Research Article

A qualitative perspective on behavioural biases affecting investment decisions of stock

market investors

1*
Santosha Kumar Mallick, 2Dr. S.S. Debasish
1*
Research Scholar, Department of Business Administration, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar-751004, India
2
Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Utkal University,Bhubaneswar-
751004, India
1

Abstract

Human decisions are rational or irrational. This view has shown that people have bias and cognitive
barriers that prevent them from reaching full understanding when making financial decisions. With
regards to singular investment choices, it is essential to recollect that every investment choice
accompanies a specific level of vulnerability and hazard. There is adequate proof that because of the
rise of market disappointments, markets respond diversely to the conduct of a logical man. Different
biases keep individuals from logical thinking. People are blessed with understanding, which allows
them to evaluate all available facts. As a result of this, people alone can make accurate predictions
about future events, allowing them to make major financial decisions. The concept of rationality is
based on two ideas: "order of order" and "act of understanding." In the case of a conscious mind, one
chooses a behaviour that enhances predictable spending, and in the case of practical comprehension,
the investor chooses the type of activity that enhances consumption.

Keywords: Anchoring, Behavioural bias, Decision making, Disposition, Herding Behaviour,

Investment decisions.

1. Introduction

Traditional currencies are built in the right market place. According to this, financial investors
approach market data and product costs, and it is considered sensible. Albeit present day finance has
gotten progressively complex, it is as yet hard to clarify the logical reasons why individuals act so
impolitely when working with finance. While customary finance implies that individuals assess and
work on their monetary choices, moral choices takes a look at what financial investors ought to do
and incorporates conventional monetary establishments with what individuals do as far as business
choices. Sociological and psychological fields are considered critical shifts in the field of ethical
financial studies. Many studies have found behavioural discrimination among investors, as opposed
to effective market speculation. The financial vision of morality, which ensures that moral
discrimination affects people, replaces the classical rationality hypothesis. Behavioural finance has
been defined as the study of how psychology affects the financial system and financial decisions.

3503
 Santosha Kumar Mallick, Dr. S.S. Debasish

Behavioural economics are new financial market events that have emerged as a result of traditional
financial challenges. It is seen as a financial situation where agents do not fully think. Investors make
decisions that increase profits while reducing costs.

Some of the pioneers of this field have developed moral discrimination which is considered to be the
basis of moral finance. Inconsistencies between traditional financial and ethical areas are created to
exacerbate moral bias. Many studies have challenged the notion and, as a result, Ethical finances
have changed. Moral bias refers to inequalities in the way people make judgments about benefits and
decisions about losses. The same person with the risk of disagreeing with a decision affecting the
gain becomes the person seeking the risk to make the decision including the loss. Overconfidence,
domination, adherence, disagreement, acquisition tendencies, commitment, accounting, fencing, and
bias represented by a few factors that appear to be ethical financial elements that have a major
impact on individual investor decisions.

Behavioural financiers state that multiple behavioural bias influences the investment decision-
making process, which causes investors to go astray and make irrational investment decisions.
Current research provides a comprehensive assessment of behavioural bias in individual decision-
making. The value of this research article has grown exponentially, including in the theoretical and
artistic contributions. Following the literature review, it was found that there was a need for a single
study that included a systematic review of behavioural bias.

The purpose of the study was to see how previous behaviour or beliefs affected the outcome, and it
was discovered that sticking to bias in one's beliefs leads to inconsistency. It then looked at how
people resolve conflicts between their succeeding beliefs and previous behaviours by modifying their
thought attitudes rather than their behaviours.. It also supported the idea that people reconciled the
differences between their previous behaviour and their subsequent beliefs by harmonizing their
circumstances with their own beliefs rather than their own. Discrimination-based research was
conducted using data from undergraduate research studies of undergraduate students and financial
industry experts to assess the effects of adherence to equity reimbursement rates. The background
information for the titles has also been changed. It was also found that university students'
assessments were influenced by the initial stock price, and professional testing was not economically
or statistically significant, and that experts were unaware of the impact that was made by the returns
in comparison to the expectations. The impact of hidden adverse effects caused by erroneous data on
numerical judgments was assessed using strong event-related research in young, healthy people. The
effect of adherence to investor rating on unit trust returns was investigated in the investment area
where the courses were invested, and it was determined that the courses would change their ratings if
they were later offered anchor. According to the study findings, the presence of the anchor did not
affect the ratings of respondents. A study was conducted to evaluate trading strategies that promote
discriminatory behaviour on investors. According to the findings of the study, the declining options
define profit as broader variables and define trading methods that benefit the holding bias.

2. Literature review

Shin, H. & Park, S., (2018) said that although modern finances are increasing, it is still difficult to
explain why people behave rudely when dealing with money for scientific reasons. Behaviour is an
artistic way of describing the function of a financial market that is opposed to the perception of an

3504
 A qualitative perspective on behavioural biases affecting investment decisions of stock market
investors
active market. Traditional currencies held that price fluctuations always reflected fully the available
information, but ethical finance claims that prices or security varied as a result of poor investment
and poor financial performance in the financial markets. With greater investor engagement, ethical
finance focuses on investor behaviour and decision-making processes. Overconfidence is a
fundamental building block in the field of ethical finance. Overconfidence is a strong consequence of
psychology, and has been identified as one of the main causes of market uncertainty. Overconfidence
is a well-known crime that investors are overconfident of their knowledge and skills while ignoring
the risks associated with financial decisions. Self-confidence is defined as complete self-confidence.
When faced with security, when a trader is overconfident in his tactics and mindset, he is influenced
by overconfidence. Overconfident investors may view event events as non-existent, possible or
unlikely due to strong economic conditions. The impact of ethical bias on investment decisions such
as the measurement of trade prices in the stock market. Overconfidence can lead to an increase in
trading value. Face-to-face marketing products that are the face of new financial innovations have
been studied in research-driven or gambling-oriented research. The findings of the study suggest that
structured marketing assets are entirely related to investors ’behavioural preferences, particularly
overconfidence. There are many moral aspects including: Overconfidence, Anchoring, Disposition
effect, Herding bias.

2.1 Overconfidence

Ahmad et al., (2019) studied that Overconfidence is a psychological aspect of ethical investments
that have a profound effect on individual investment decisions. These decisions can be investments
in stocks or other types of investments. Overconfidence is a widespread psychological choice of
financial ethics that causes financial markets to malfunction by causing volatility in a highly volatile
environment and restoring diversity. Many types of texts refer to the concept of overconfidence, but
it can be explained in a better way. Overconfidence is a emotional and psychological choice which
leads the investor to believe that the parameter is more important than that, and it is also thought that
one's judgment is worse and worse. With those judgments, one can never learn the right distribution.
During the period of overconfidence, it was found that the general fund manager was doing well in
the market. Without a lot of evidence to show that overconfidence is rampant, there is little attention
in the economy. Choosing overconfidence has received a lot of research and there are a variety of
behavioural patterns on the agent’s rational behaviour. According to researchers, overconfidence is
often the result of an oblivious attitude. It has been shown that overconfidence leads to increased
trading volume and falling prices in the stock market. Overreacting by investors is caused by
overconfidence in their ability to understand or absorb information. Contrary to this study,
researchers argue that overconfidence is a good indicator of individual investment performance
followed by market crises. Overconfidence is therefore a misdemeanour when people focus on their
strengths, knowledge, perception, or maximizing the potential for a particular event.

2.2 Herding behaviour

Alrabadi et al., (2018) stated that herding is a common occurrence in the financial market. In times
of turmoil in the financial markets, it is natural for a person to direct, watch, and copy the behaviour
of others. Investors do not make sound decisions to invest in the pastoral care. They prefer to base
their financial decisions on the beliefs and opinions of other investors. As a result, when investors are

3505
 Santosha Kumar Mallick, Dr. S.S. Debasish

pastors, they tend to impose their decisions and follow the lead of others. The emergence of the stock
effect is often talked about in times of market turmoil, such as market volatility, price bubbles, and
rumours. Shepherding is defined as a co-ordination that leads to a combination of mobility. Qasim et
al., (2019) stated that Numerous study materials have also shown that pastoral behaviour can lead to
similar patterns of social mobility, leading to significant social losses. The behaviour of the herd is
described in another way in one of the study publications, namely that when agents are allowed to
approach their network neighbours, the impact of responsiveness on network structure and game
outcomes is recognized. This is known as pastoral behaviour. When some agents are willing to look
for their naturally wealthy neighbours, a new type of business event known as pastoral behaviour is
possible.

2.3 Anchoring

Anum, (2017) noticed that one of the most well-studied racism is anchoring. Choosing adherence
affects investor decision-making processes. Anchoring is seen as an insightful belief that explains
why ordinary people rely more on basic knowledge when making decisions. Investors tend to
support the purchase of their shares at the latest high stock price. Such behavioural responses suggest
that connection adherence is linked to low-level investor decision-making processes. Preferential
selection seems to be a way to measure stock market returns or profits using a 52-week high-level
ethics and resilience strategy under uncertain conditions. Researchers have discovered that anchoring
has a negative impact on individual investors' or traders' investment judgments. Investigators argue
that adherence, such as judicial choice, directs final decisions early in a judge's examination.
According to heuristic anchoring-and-adjustment, anchoring bias is caused by inadequate
adjustment. Heuristic anchoring promotes extreme limitations, often referred to as inactivity. People
use this heuristic to make an anchor for other visible results and obey according to predicted
information.

2.4 Disposition effect

Baker et al., (2019) stated that the result of the situation is the performance of investors to avoid
significant losses in anticipation of profits. The result of the situation is calculated by subtracting the
percentage of gains earned from the losses component. Investigators have found the result of a trend
as an investor's policy of keeping investments in the long run and selling winners to investment soon.
The effect of the situation has a negative impact on a person's investment as financial losses often do
not perform well, while successful investments often do. Investigators found that the fraudulent
assessment of future profits or losses did not affect the impact of the situation.

3. Analysis

Jain et al., (2019) stated that in terms of behavioural results, incorrect data refers to the final test in
the upper direct relationship following the upper and lower anchors following. False data creates a
weak adherence bias compared to uncertain data. A strong test of pricing in online markets also
creates tangible behaviour. Research has looked at how informal information affects investment
decisions, especially the effect of adherence seen in online bidding. The findings of the study
revealed the presence of behavioural adherence during online auction. Researchers assessed the
influence of the situation on the basic stock trading process in their study to better understand the

3506
 A qualitative perspective on behavioural biases affecting investment decisions of stock market
investors
bias of the effect of the effect on individual decision-making. According to the findings of this study,
the situation can sometimes have a negative financial impact. The outcome of the situation is not
affected by the chances of gain or expected losses in the newly established online trading
environment. The study looked at the potential investment effect on Taiwan licensed market
investors. The findings of the study indicated the existence of an influence on the situation in
Taiwan's authoritative markets, as well as the fact that permits with different prices in the market
showed a diverse character. Researchers have used trading account data from China to examine the
role of influence in investing in making China's growing stock market. Mushinada & Veluri, (2018)
found that Chinese investors made poor trade decisions and gained victories but not losses. They
prefer to sell the profits at a price but not the ones that have fallen in price and have shown a more
ethical behaviour. The report analysed the impact of the commercial discounted trading records for
further analysis of the outcome. Artistic research suggests that wealthy and professional investors
have a low profile when considering socio-economic factors.

Shantha (2019) suggested that Royal data was presented to analyse the broad market impact of the
situation on the trading volume of Initial Public Offering, and the outcome of its disposal was
determined to be more reliable due to the current purchase price presented by investors in the First
Public Offering. Other studies, similar to this IPO study, investigated the aftermarket effects of the
situation on IPO in the Bursa Malaysia market. According to the study, 2.64 repeated investors
wanted to include a winning IPO rather than a failed IPO which resulted in a consistent result. Equity
premium status function investigated. This paper has shown that the discovery of the status of
investors causes investors to pay higher fees when depositing money in stocks. In the future of the
Korean stock market, research has examined the effect of investment performance and found strong
evidence of the existence of a financial performance effect. According to the study, individual
investors are more affected by the trend than external and institutional investors. Hsu et al., (2021)
suggested there is a negative link between investment performance and the outcome of the situation,
and the choice of firmness is stronger in long-term holding than short positions. Another study was
conducted to support this study to investigate the effects of the situation on individual investors on
the Taiwan Stock Exchange. According to the findings of this study, the level of education of
individual investors is positively correlated with the impact of the situation. The role of the situation
in Taiwan's co-operative fund investors has been researched. The findings revealed that the
performance of the situation varies between markets. The impact of the situation was not found to be
consistent among Taiwan's mutual fund investors. The findings revealed that the performance of the
situation varies between markets. The impact of the situation was not found to be consistent among
Taiwan's mutual fund investors. According to the findings, during a bad market, investors are
investing their money more collectively than in the bull market. As a result of the study, it was found
that the effect of the situation was also on investors in the co-operative fund in Taiwan (Raut et al.,
2018).

Metawa et al., (2019) suggested that another approach to assessing the relationship to recovering
unparalleled risks in the financial markets by the presence of pastoral practices was developed to
determine the impact of pastoral elections on individual decision-making. The findings of the study
revealed a reversed response in Asian financial markets due to pastoral conditions. An examination
of Islamic conduct in Islamic banks and finances was tested in one of the studies. Pastoral behaviour

3507
 Santosha Kumar Mallick, Dr. S.S. Debasish

was found to be the first order of the study. Herding effect on the company's business cycle has been
studied in depth. The findings of the study revealed that an integrated livestock herding pattern was
illuminated in the economic cycle of the firm. In contrast, evidence was produced in relation to the
effect of pastoral care at times when markets were highly volatile, indicating that the distribution of
exchange rate returns was declining due to intraday instability. One of the tests looked at how
pastoral care affects decision-making in people. The findings of the study suggest that monitoring
mechanisms are in place for individual investment decisions. In addition, it was established later in
the study that pastoral bias varies between male and female animals.

Trejos et al., (2019) stated that many studies have been instrumental in better understanding the
impact of pastoral behaviour on investment decisions that are sold in a volatile market. According to
the study, the tendency to pastoralism may reflect the choices made by fund managers. The effect of
pastoral behaviour on various behaviours was studied experimentally. According to the findings,
pastoral behaviour has a major impact on endless portfolio selection. In another study, the effects of
institutional supervision on institutional investors were investigated, with this tendency considered to
look at the same data published as well as to protect the work and reputation of investors. The
oversight function of mutual fund manager management was investigated, and it was found that
pastoral conduct was influenced by the paper profit margin and the paper loss rate. It has also been
found that the tendency of fund managers to undermine financial performance.

There is a strong link between behavioural bias and decision-making.

• Investment decisions have a profound effect on Overconfidence.

• Investment decisions have a significant impact on Anchoring.
• Investment decisions have a huge impact on the Disposition.
• Investment decisions have a big impact on Herding.

Zahera & Bansal, (2018) suggested that the effect of the sale of pastoral behaviour disappeared. It
has also been shown that the effect of the situation is to influence prejudice. The presence of a
pastoral effect is particularly noted in Asian markets, as evidenced by the breeding of asymmetry
during emerging markets. In addition, shepherding was seen in US and Latin American markets
throughout the world. According to research by Madaan & Singh, (2019), banking supervision
varies with different types of loans. Reductions were found more frequently on home loans and
credit cards than other types of loans, according to a study. In addition, the report looks at how large
banks operate more than smaller and regional banks. In one of the studies, the existence of pastoral
behaviour was tested between the stock market and the oil market during market turmoil.
Researchers have found that stock market instability has led to a decline in the quality of farming. It
has also been shown that the pastoral approach is inconsistent with both markets, and that pastoral
behaviour is exacerbated by a lack of knowledge in both markets.

4. Conclusion

This analysis showed the behavioural bias existing regarding investment decisions in the stock
market. Various factors regarding the behavioural bias like overconfidence, herding behaviour,
anchoring and disposition effect was discussed. This is related to the study of behavioural
psychology and behaviour economics. This study helps in revealing the deviations from the

3508
 A qualitative perspective on behavioural biases affecting investment decisions of stock market
investors
rationality which investors claim. Being a victim of cognitive bias, individuals alter their decisions
which lead to exiting anomalies in the market. It can be said that decision making refers to selecting
the best option out of a viable alternative available. This behavioural bias concept has come into
being because of the social and intellectual nature of human beings which they apply into the process
of decision making. Thus, this study shed light on this aspect regarding investment decisions in the
stock market.

References
1. Ahmad Sabir, S., Mohammad, H., & Kadir Shahar, H. (2019). The role of overconfidence and past investment
experience in herding behaviour with a moderating effect of financial literacy: evidence from Pakistan stock
exchange. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 9(4), 480-490.
2. Alrabadi, D. W. H., Al-Abdallah, S. Y., & Aljarayesh, N. I. A. (2018). Behavioral biases and investment
performance: Does gender matter? Evidence from Amman Stock Exchange. Jordan Journal of Economic
Sciences, 5(1), 77-92.
3. Anum, B. A. (2017). Behavioral factors and their impact on individual investors decision making and investment
performance: empirical investigation from Pakistani stock market. Global Journal of Management and Business
Research.
4. Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., Goyal, N., & Gaur, V. (2019). How financial literacy and demographic variables relate to
behavioral biases. Managerial Finance.
5. Hsu, Y. L., Chen, H. L., Huang, P. K., & Lin, W. Y. (2021). Does financial literacy mitigate gender differences in
investment behavioral bias?. Finance Research Letters, 41, 101789.
6. Jain, J., Walia, N., & Gupta, S. (2019). Evaluation of behavioral biases affecting investment decision making of
individual equity investors by fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Review of Behavioral Finance.
7. Madaan, G., & Singh, S. (2019). An analysis of behavioral biases in investment decision-making. International
Journal of Financial Research, 10(4), 55-67.
8. Metawa, N., Hassan, M. K., Metawa, S., & Safa, M. F. (2019). Impact of behavioral factors on investors’ financial
decisions: case of the Egyptian stock market. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and
Management.
9. Mushinada, V. N. C., & Veluri, V. S. S. (2018). Investor’s overconfidence behaviour at Bombay stock
exchange. International Journal of Managerial Finance.
10. Qasim, M., Hussain, R., Mehboob, I. and Arshad, M., 2019. Impact of herding behavior and overconfidence bias
on investors’ decision-making in Pakistan. Accounting, 5(2), pp.81-90.
11. Raut, R. K., Das, N., & Kumar, R. (2018). Extending the theory of planned behaviour: Impact of past behavioural
biases on the investment decision of Indian investors. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 11(1), 265-291.
12. Shantha, K. V. A. (2019). Individual investors’ learning behavior and its impact on their herd bias: an integrated
analysis in the context of stock trading. Sustainability, 11(5), 1448.
13. Shin, H. & Park, S., (2018). Do foreign investors mitigate anchoring bias in stock market? Evidence based on
post-earnings announcement drift. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 48, pp.224-240.
14. Trejos, C., van Deemen, A., Rodríguez, Y. E., & Gómez, J. M. (2019). Overconfidence and disposition effect in
the stock market: A micro world based setting. Journal of behavioral and experimental finance, 21, 61-69.
15. Zahera, S. A., & Bansal, R. (2018). Do investors exhibit behavioral biases in investment decision making? A
systematic review. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets.

3509

View publication stats