0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

Video Test Rubric for Midterm Exam

The document is a video test rubric for a mid-term exam, outlining evaluation criteria across five categories: Planning, Content, Design, Technical Elements, and Group Work. Each category is rated on a scale from 10 (Outstanding) to 2.5 (Insufficient), with specific descriptors for each level of performance. The rubric aims to assess students' planning, content presentation, video organization, technical quality, and collaborative effort in their video projects.

Uploaded by

Denis Barrera
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

Video Test Rubric for Midterm Exam

The document is a video test rubric for a mid-term exam, outlining evaluation criteria across five categories: Planning, Content, Design, Technical Elements, and Group Work. Each category is rated on a scale from 10 (Outstanding) to 2.5 (Insufficient), with specific descriptors for each level of performance. The rubric aims to assess students' planning, content presentation, video organization, technical quality, and collaborative effort in their video projects.

Uploaded by

Denis Barrera
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

VIDEO TEST RUBRIC

MID TERM EXAM/ 1ST TERM-2019


NAMES:_________________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL:_________
TEACHER: DENIS BARRERA GORDON MRS. SCORE:____/50 GRADE:

CATEGORY 10 Outstanding 7,5 Notable 5 Approved 2.5 Insufficient

1. Planning Students plan The students plan with Students need help Students need help writing
independently and write a some help and write a writing the script. Some of the script. The script does
compelling and creative convincing and creative the group members define not match the final
script. All the members of script. their functions and production. Some team
the group define their All group members rehearse the vocabulary members do not do their
functions and rehearse the define their functions and language of the homework.
vocabulary and language of and rehearse the videos but they need to
the video. vocabulary and be reminded of their
language of the videos. homework.
2. Content The video clearly and The video presents the The video presents the The video does not
concisely presents the work work done Reflects work done but the present all the information
done Reflects perfectly the perfectly although it is information is not well of the work It sometimes
students' learning and their too long or there are organized and there are moves away from the
efforts. some points that are points that are not clear focus. There is an
not clear in the organization but not very
explanation. consistent and lack of
information on basic
points of work.
3. Design The organization of the The sequence of the The sequence of the The sequence of the
video is excellent. There are videos is clear and videos is adequate. There videos is illogical. There
titles that favor the evident. Titles are used are titles. are no titles.
understanding of the that facilitate
subject by the possible understanding.
spectators.
4. Technical The video is very sharp. The The video is very sharp. The video looks good. The Parts of the video are not
elements titles are legible. There is no The titles are legible. sound and visual files may visible Sound and visual
technical problem of a There are some have some distortion, but files contain significant
serious nature. technical problems. they do not distract the distortion. The titles are
viewer. There are some illegible. Technical
technical problems, but difficulties seriously
the viewer is able to follow interfere with the ability of
the presentation the viewer to see, hear or
understand the content
CC BY-NC-ND
5. Group They work a lot and with They work. Some They work, but without They just work. Without
work very good organization. organizational failures organization. interest

You might also like