Overview
of
Collaborative
Learning
Techniques:
Problem
Solving
CoLTs
Source:
Collaborative
Learning
Techniques
by
Barkley,
Major
and
Cross
(Jossey-‐-‐-‐Bass,
2014)
With
additional
adaptations
from
George
Washington
University
Teaching
&
Learning
Center
13
Think-‐aloud
Pair
Problem
Solving
Students
solve
problems
aloud
to
try
out
their
reasoning
on
a
listening
peer.
This
technique
is
useful
for
emphasizing
the
problem
solving
process
rather
than
the
product
and
helping
students
identify
process
errors.
Pairs
of
students
are
presented
with
a
series
of
problem.
For
each
problem,
one
student
thinks
aloud
about
how
to
solve
the
problem
while
the
other
student
listens
and
offers
suggestions
or
requests
clarifications.
The
students
alternate
roles.
Although
the
problems
would
be
designed
to
have
a
single
answer,
open
ended
problems
may
also
be
used.
If
all
of
the
pairs
use
the
same
questions,
the
pairs
can
report-‐out
their
solutions
with
the
class.
The
students
should
record
the
steps
taken
to
solve
the
problem.
Since
students
may
not
be
comfortable
with
sharing
their
reasoning,
some
level
of
trust
among
the
students
prior
to
the
activity
is
desirable.
Students
may
also
need
help
in
learning
how
to
present
their
steps
in
problem
solving.
Some
assessment
of
the
results
(the
recorded
steps)
is
necessary
since
the
reasoning
or
the
answer
may
be
incorrect.
Group
size
Pairs
Time
on
task
30
to
45
minutes
Preparation
Develop
an
appropriate
set
of
problems
that
can
be
solved
in
a
limited
amount
of
time..
Ideally
the
problems
should
engage
the
students
in
identifying
the
type
of
the
problem,
the
knowledge
and
skill
required
to
solve
the
problem,
and
the
criteria
for
selecting
or
evaluating
a
solution.
Procedure
1. Students
form
pairs.
2. The
instructor
provides
the
basic
instructions
concerning
what
the
students
are
to
do,
states
the
time
limit,
and
indicates
how
the
results
will
be
collected.
3. One
student
reads
the
problem
aloud
and
talks
through
the
process
of
solving
the
problem.
4. The
listener
should
offer
encouragement
through
requests
for
clarification
and
suggestions
while
recording
the
steps.
5. The
students
change
roles
and
address
the
next
problem.
6. The
activity
ends
when
either
all
of
the
problems
are
solved
or
a
time
limit
is
reached
14
Send-‐problem
Students
try
to
solve
a
problem
as
a
group,
and
then
pass
the
problem
and
solution
to
another
group
who
does
the
same;
the
final
group
evaluates
the
solutions.
This
technique
is
useful
for
helping
students
practice,
as
a
group,
the
thinking
skills
required
for
effective
problem
solving
and
for
evaluating,
comparing,
and
discriminating
between
multiple
solutions.
Each
group
attempts
to
solve
the
problem
without
looking
at
the
solutions
offered
by
previous
groups.
The
activity
has
two
components:
solving
problems
and
evaluating
solutions.
Several
variations
are
possible.
For
example,
the
students
might
generate
a
list
of
problems
they
would
like
to
see
solved
in
class
or
problems
from
old
exams
might
be
used
in
reviewing
for
an
upcoming
exam.
The
technique
is
best
used
for
problems
where
there
is
more
than
one
solution
or
where
some
solutions
are
better
than
others.
Timing
can
be
an
issue
since
different
groups
may
work
at
different
rates.
Presenting
an
example
and
a
format
for
reporting
a
solution
is
useful.
Group
size
2
to
4
Time
on
task
30
to
45
minutes
Preparation
Determine
how
many
problems
will
be
needed
so
that
the
groups
work
simultaneously
and
complete
both
the
problem
solving
and
solution
evaluation
activities.
Establish
time
limits
and
the
order
in
which
groups
should
exchange
their
results.
Provide
very
clear
instructions
about
what
the
students
should
do.
A
file
folder
should
be
used
to
hold
the
solutions
that
the
teams
provide.
Procedure
1. The
instructor
describes
the
activity,
gives
instructions
and
answers
procedural
questions.
2. The
students
form
groups.
3. Problems
are
distributed
to
the
groups.
4. The
groups
discuss
the
problem,
generate
possible
solutions,
indicate
the
best
solution
and
add
their
report
to
the
response
folder.
5. Notify
the
groups
that
time
has
expired
and
that
the
folder
should
be
passed
to
the
next
group.
6. The
new
groups
repeat
the
process.
7. Repeat
as
needed
until
one
exchange
remains
and
the
folder
is
passed
to
the
final
group.
8. The
final
group
analyzes
and
evaluates
the
proposed
solutions
and
places
a
report
in
the
folder.
9. After
the
appropriate
time
has
elapsed
the
final
groups
may
report
out
their
results.
15
Case
Study
Student
teams
review
a
written
study
of
a
realistic
scenario
and
develop
a
solution
to
the
dilemma
or
problem
presented
in
the
case.
The
technique
is
useful
for
presenting
abstract
principles
and
theories
in
ways
that
students
find
relevant.
Typically
the
“case”
includes
a
history
of
how
a
situation
developed
and
presents
a
dilemma
or
problem
that
a
key
character
is
facing.
Writing
a
good
case
can
be
difficult.
For
example,
while
adding
detail
to
a
case
can
make
it
feel
more
realistic,
it
may
also
obscure
the
point
of
the
case.
In
many
disciplines
case
banks
are
available.
Rather
than
a
written
case
videos
may
be
available.
Group
size
3
to
6
Time
on
task
Varies
Preparation
Writing
a
good
case
is
a
complex
task.
Both
real
and
hypothetical
cases
require
a
good
deal
of
effort.
However,
there
are
many
case
data
banks
that
can
be
used.
The
cases
will
need
to
be
distributed
to
the
students
and
there
should
be
a
series
of
question
to
guide
the
students.
Procedure
1. Distribute
the
cases,
questions
and
other
instructions.
2. Form
student
groups.
3. Allow
time
for
the
students
to
ask
question
about
the
process
of
the
activity.
4. Students
work
in
groups
to
study
the
case
for
some
period
of
time.
This
might
be
one
class
or
an
extended
period
including
out
of
class
effort.
5. The
groups
identify
factual
issues,
apply
analytical
techniques,
present
the
issues,
draw
conclusions,
and
make
recommendations.
6. The
groups
prepare
a
written
or
oral
report
on
their
work.
7. The
groups
present
or
discuss
their
work
on
the
case
with
the
rest
of
the
class.
16
Structured
problem
solving
Student
groups
follow
a
structured
format
to
solve
problems.
The
technique
is
useful
for
dividing
th e
problem-‐-‐-‐solving
processes
into
manageable
steps
so
that
students
learn
to
identify,
analyze,
and
solve
problems
in
an
organized
manner.
The
activity
also
promotes
meta-‐cognitive
disciplinary
skills.
There
is
a
time
limit
for
the
activity.
The
group
must
agree
to
a
solution
and
be
able
to
explain
the
solution
and
the
strategy
used
to
solve
the
problem.
This
technique
can
be
used
to
develop
problem
solving
skills
and
trust
before
more
complex
techniques
are
used.
The
groups
can
build
a
response
that
indicates
the
parts
of
the
solving
process.
For
example,
the
groups
might
report
out
about
what
is
known,
what
needs
to
be
known,
and
how
the
missing
information
or
knowledge
be
found.
Group
size
4
to
6
Time
on
task
1
to
2
hours
Preparation
Creating
a
problem
that
is
sufficiently
complex
to
require
student
effort
and
is
readily
broken
into
parts
is
challenging.
The
instructor
should
solve
the
problem
using
the
specified
procedure.
It
will
be
useful
to
build
additional
hand-‐out
materials
focused
on
the
problem
and
the
problem
solving
steps.
Procedure
1. Distribute
the
problems
and
indicate
the
procedure
for
the
activity.
2. Form
student
groups.
3. Allow
students
to
ask
questions
about
the
process
of
the
activity.
4. Allow
the
groups
to
solve
the
problem
using
the
specified
step-‐wise
problem
solving
technique.
5. The
team
records
the
results
of
each
step.
6. The
groups
report
out
their
solution
and
how
they
developed
it.
17
Analytic
teams
Team
members
assume
roles
and
specific
tasks
when
critically
reading
an
assignment,
listening
to
a
lecture,
or
watching
a
video.
This
technique
is
useful
for
helping
students
understand
the
different
activities
that
constitute
a
critical
analysis.
The
roles
might
include
a
summarizer,
proponent
and
critic.
The
roles
allow
the
students
to
assume
the
positions
of
the
parts
of
a
critical
analysis.
They
focus
on
one
part
of
the
analysis.
The
task
needs
to
be
sufficiently
complex
that
each
of
the
students
will
be
able
to
participate
in
a
significant
way.
It
is
useful
for
the
students
to
do
the
reading
beforehand
and
have
them
express
what
skills
they
believe
their
role
requires.
Group
size
4
or
5
Time
on
task
15
to
45
minutes
Preparation
Select
the
topic
and
determine
the
roles
that
the
students
will
take.
The
roles
might
include:
proponent,
critic,
example
giver,
summarizer,
and
questioner.
Each
role
should
have
a
significant
task.
Determine
how
the
teams
should
report-‐out
their
work.
Procedure
1. Present
the
topic
and
the
rules
for
the
activity
including
a
time
limit.
2. Allow
students
to
ask
questions
about
the
procedure.
3. Form
teams
and
assign
the
specific
roles.
4. Assign
the
reading
or,
as
appropriate,
present
a
lecture
or
view
a
video.
5. In
class
the
individuals
in
the
team
will
present
the
findings
from
their
role.
6. The
group
will
work
together
to
prepare
an
oral
or
written
report
of
their
analyses.
7. The
groups
will
report-‐out
their
findings.
18
Group
investigation
Groups
of
students
plan,
conduct,
and
report
on
in-‐-‐-‐depth
research
projects.
This
is
useful
for
teaching
students
a b o u t
research
procedures
and
how
to
gain
in-‐-‐-‐depth
knowledge.
Having
a
time
limit
and
having
a
set
of
steps
to
follow
discourages
plagiarism
that
might
happen
with
a
more
traditional
term
paper.
Using
peer
and
instructor
review
of
the
project
can
provide
practical
experience
in
giving
and
receiving
constructive
criticism.
The
assignment
should
provide
some
direction
about
manageable
steps.
Some
steps
to
consider
are
the
construction
and
presentation
of
an
initial
prospectus,
identifying
and
collecting
resources,
building
an
outline,
planning
and
delivering
a
presentation,
and
revising
a
final
report
given
the
presentation.
The
prospectus
can
include
specifications
of
the
research
question,
goals,
resources,
methods,
and
work
plan.
Students
should
have
time
in
the
class
period
for
brief
team
discussion.
This
indicates
to
the
students
that
the
activity
is
an
essential
part
of
the
course.
Group
size
2
to
5
Time
on
task
Several
hours
Preparation
Preparation
will
be
similar
to
that
for
a
term
paper.
Make
decisions
about
the
topics,
the
sources,
and
the
manner
of
reporting
out
by
presentation
and
written
report.
Also
determine
the
way
in
which
the
groups
will
report
their
progress
during
the
activity.
Having
deadlines
for
steps
as
well
as
interim
reports
is
useful.
Determine
the
amount
of
time
the
students
can
use
in
class
for
their
group
work.
Procedure
1. Allow
students
to
propose
topics
that
are
within
the
parameters
of
the
course.
2. Allow
students
to
identify
their
interest
in
the
topics.
3. As
far
as
possible,
form
groups
based
on
student
interests.
4. Give
teams
class
time
prepare
a
prospectus
for
their
investigation.
5. Review
the
prospectus
6. Students
begin
work
on
the
reviewed
prospectus.
7. Groups
report-‐out
their
efforts.