Research Methodology for Civil Engineering
Research Methodology for Civil Engineering
IPRC KIGALI
CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
B-Tech Program (Year4 WAS, QUS, HWE, LSV)
ACADEMIC YEAR 2023-2024
CCMRM801 – RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
10Credits ( 100hours)
Research work is traditionally defined as gathering of data to answer the questions and finding
solution to problems. The research work may be asked to provide answer to questions of
theoretical interest to particular discipline. Research should not be considered as academic
activity only; it also applies to all the respect of human activity. Research is basis for making
process of decision effective and more meaningful. It includes the defining of research problem
formulation of hypothesis, collection of data, analysing of data and arriving to conclusions. After
the conclusions are drawn, it is also necessary to find out testing of the conclusions in relation to
the hypothesis.
Now research has acquired so much of prominence in all the activities, that no development can
be thought without proper application of research. Research is now taken up by many
professionals. It is a way of thinking. It critically examines the various aspect of the professional
work. It is a habit of questioning what you do and systematic examination of observed
information to find answer, with a view to make appropriate change for effective use of the
information.
1.1. Definition
On the basis of the definitions given by various authors we can summarize that the research is
an organized inquiry designed and carried out to provide information for solving problem. It is
a careful inquiry to discover new information to expand the existing knowledge. It is an
investigation, recording and analysing evidences for on-going knowledge.
1.2. Characteristics of research
a) Controlled: In a study of cause and effect relationships it is important to be able to link
the effect (s) with the cause (s) and vice versa. The concept of control implies that, in
exploring set up your study in a way that minimizes the effects of other factors affecting
the relationship.
b) Rigorous: You must be scrupulous in ensuring that the procedures followed to find
answer to questions are relevant; appropriate and justified.
d) Valid and Verifiable: This concept implies that whatever you conclude on the
basis of your findings is correct and can be verified by you and others.
e) Empirical: This means that any conclusions drawn are based upon hard evidence
gathered from information collected from real life experiences or observations.
f) Critical: The process of investigation must be fool proof and free from drawbacks. The
process adopted and the procedures used must be able to withstand critical scrutiny.
The research is being conducted with a purpose of discovering answer to the question by
making an application of scientific procedures. The main objective of the research work is to
take out the hidden facts yet to be discovered. Every research study has its own purpose to be
attended; therefore objectives of research can be broadly classified as academic and utility one.
A) Academic Objectives – It relates to development of new concept and addition to old concept.
It means that urge for knowledge is main factor in this type of objectives of research.
All development and progress in the society is an outcome of a research work. The
development of logical thinking is promoted by conducting the research activities.
Research has special importance in relation to solving various problems of business and
industries. Market research, operation research and motivation research are conducted in
the business for various requirements. The importance of research can also be ascertained
through its application in socio political sector in order to find out solution to social and political
problem of the society.
1.6. Relevance of research
There are various approaches to research work. Every research project is different from each
other on account its time and place in which it is to be conducted. But all the research projects
will have common understanding of the society and have common steps through which
research is conducted. In order to have proper research work, every research project work,
every research project has to have research problem identified. The research process will
consist of particular objective which should be clearly stated and there should be a
hypothesis which has to be proceeding right or wrong.
In addition to this each research project will have research design which indicates as to how
required data will be collected, analyzed and interpreted. The research process consists of
series of various actions, which are necessary to effective research work.
The stages in research process are listed as, selecting research problems and stating of
hypothesis, formulating of research design, collecting, analysing and interpreting of data. These
steps can be summarized as:
The stages which are explained above are depended on each other. It is clear from the above
steps sequence in the research process, which are described as:
1) Formulation of research problem
2) Review of the existing literature
3) Formation and development of working hypothesis
4) Preparation of research design
5) Determining sample design
6) Data collection
7) Project execution
8) Data analysis
9) Testing of hypothesis
10) Data interpretation
11) Report of the research work.
In order to understand the research process perfectly brief description of each of the stages is
provided and can more helpful to researchers:
3|Page Course notes for B-Tech_RP_IPRCKigali
Lecturer: Assiel Mugabe
a. Formulation of research problem: The research problem relates to statement of problem and
relationship between two variables under study.
Research has to identify the problem first and later on its required to single out the problem.
This will give scope to researcher to decide general area of interest or subject matter of that
researcher who has no knowledge about subject matter will not be in a position to collect and
analyse data. Therefore researcher is supposed to have proper knowledge of later stages
before be performing the earlier stages. Research process is system of interdependent related
stages. Before giving brief description of the various stages involved in research process it is
necessary to understand the difference between research method and research process.
c. Formation and development of working hypothesis: After the formation of the research
problem and reviewing of the available existing literature now hypothesis is
required to be explained by the researcher. The normal assumptions which are the base of the
study which may be tentative in nature are considered as hypothesis.
e. Determining sample design: The success of the research study is largely based on
proper identification of the sample to be selected for the study. the method for selecting is
normally known as sample design. It is a sample plan already decided before later is collected
from given population.
f. Data collection: The data is collected as per the requirement of the study. This may be primary
or secondary in nature. If the secondary is sufficient enough to assess the research problem
then there is no necessity for primary data to be collected. As per the requirement of the
research study appropriate data is a basic need of research. This primary data can be collected
by observation, interview, questionnaire and schedule.
g. Project execution: The project execution is very important stage in the research process. It
should be executed in a systematic manner. Therefore periodical and occasional check is
essential for verification of the data collected.
i. Testing of hypothesis: It is only after the analysing data, researcher can go further
in testing of his hypothesis in which he can ascertain the fact to support or disagree with the
hypothesis.
I. Preliminary part
II. Main text of the report
III. Conclusion part
IV. Reference material
Exploratory research is preliminary study of an unfamiliar problem about which the researcher
has little or no knowledge. It usually takes from of a pilot study. An exploratory study does not
aim at testing hypothesis. According to Daniel Katz, it just attempts “to see what is there rather
than to predict the relationships that will be founded.” But it should be so designed as to provide
definite information as possible for a set of research objectives.
This is similar to descriptive study but with a different focus. It is directed towards discovering
what is happening, why it is happening and what can be done about it. It aims at identifying the
cases of a problem and the possible solutions for it.
Evaluation study is one type of applied research. It is made for assessing the effectiveness of
social or economic programmes implemented. Evaluative research is thus, directed to assess or
Historical research is a study of past records and other information sources with a view to
reconstructing the origin and development of an institution or a movement or a system and
discovering the trends in the past. It is descriptive in nature. It is a difficult task; it must often
depend upon inference and logical analysis of recorded date and indirect evidences rather than
upon direct observation. Hence, it is aptly described as “the induction of principles through
research in to past and social forces which have shaped the present”.
2.9. Surveys
Survey is a ‘fact finding’ study. It is a method of research involving collection of data directly
from a population or a sample there of at particular time. It must not be confused
with the mere clerical routine of gathering and tabulating figures. It requires expert and
imaginative planning, careful analysis and rational interpretation of the findings.
Data may be collected by observation, or interviewing or mailing questionnaires.
The analysis of data may be made by using simple or complex statistical techniques depending
upon the objectives of the study.
3.1. Definition
A research design is a logical and systematic plan prepared for directing a research study. It
specifies the objectives of the study, the methodology and techniques to be adopted for
achieving the objectives. It constitutes the blue print for the collection, measurement and
analysis of data. It is the plan, structure and strategy of investigation conceived so as to obtain
answer to research question. The plan is the overall scheme or program of research. A research
design is the program that guides the investigator in the process of collecting, analysing and
interpreting observation. It provides a systematic plan of procedure for the research to follow.
The preposition of a research plan for a study aids in establishing direction to the study
and in knowing exactly what has to be done and how and when it has to be done at
every stage.
It enables the researcher to consider beforehand the various decisions to be made.
Without a plan, research work becomes unfocussed and aimless empirical wandering
the researcher would find it difficult, laborious and time-consuming to make adequate
discriminations in the complex inter plan of facts before him, he may not be able to
decide which is relevant and which is not and may get lost in a welter of irrelevances.
A research plan prescribes the boundaries of research activities and enables the
researcher to channel his energies in the right work with clear research objectives in
view, the researcher can proceed systematically focused their achievement the design
also enable the research to anticipate potential problems of data gathering operation of
concepts, measurement, etc.
The formulation for research problem is the first and most important step of the research
process. It is like the identification of destination before undertaking a journey. As in the
absence of a destination, it is impossible to identify the shortest or indeed any route, in the
absence of a clear research problem, a clear and economical plan is impossible. The research
problem serves as the foundation of a research study: If is well formulated, you can expect a
good study to follow.
When selecting a research problem/topic there are a number of considerations to keep in mind.
These help to ensure that your study will be manageable and that you will be manageable and
that you will remain motivated. These considerations are interest, magnitude, measurement of
concepts, level of expertise, relevance, availability of data and ethical issues.
Interest: A research is usually time consuming, and involves hard work and possibly
unforeseen problems. If you select a topic which does not greatly interest you, it could become
extremely difficult to sustain the required motivation, and hence its completion as well as the
amount of time taken could be affected.
Magnitude: It is extremely important to select a topic that you can manage within
the time and resources at your disposal. Even if you are undertaking a descriptive study, you
need to carefully consider its magnitude.
Measurement of Concept: If you are using a concept in you study, make sure you are clear
about its indicators and their measurement. Do not use concepts in your research problem that
you are not sure how to measure.
Relevance: Select a topic that is of relevance to you as a professional. Ensure that your study
adds to the existing body of knowledge, bridges current gaps or is useful in policy formulation.
Availability of Data: If your topic entails collection of information from secondary sources
before finalising your topic, make sure that these data are available and in the format you want.
Ethical Issues: Another important consideration in formulating a research problem is the ethical
issue involved. How ethical issues can affect the study population and how ethical problems can
be overcome should be thoroughly examined at the problem formulation stage.
The formulation of a research problem is the most crucial part of the research journey on which
the quality of the entire project depends. The process of formulating a research problem
consists of a number of steps. Working through these steps presupposes a reasonable level of
knowledge in the broad subject area within which the study is to be undertaken. A brief review
of the relevant literature helps enormously in broadening this knowledge base.
Step 1: Identify a Broad Subject: Identify a broad field or subject area of interest to you. Ask
yourself, ‘what is it that really interests me as a professional’?
Step 2: Discussing sub Area of subject: Dissect the broad area into sub areas.
Step 3: Selecting most interested Area of study: Select what as of most interest to you. It is
neither advisable nor feasible to study all sub areas. Out of this list, select issues or sub areas
about which you are passionate.
Step 4: Development of Research Problem: Raise research questions at this step you ask
yourself, ‘what is it that I want to find out about in this sub area’? Within your chosen sub area,
first list whatever questions you want to find answers to.
Step 5: Formulate Objectives: Formulate objectives formulate your main objectives and your
sub objectives.
Step 6: Examine Objectives: Assess your objectives. Now examine your objectives to
ascertain the feasibility of achieving them through your research endeavour. Consider them in
the light of the time, resources (financial and human) and technical expertise at your disposal.
Step 7: Double check. Go back and give final consideration to whether or not
you are sufficiently interested in the study, and have adequate resources to undertaken it. Ask
yourself, ‘Am I really enthusiastic about this study’, and ‘Do I really have enough resources to
undertake it’?
5. Formulation of objectives
Specific objectives should be numerically listed. They should be worded clearly and
unambiguously. Make sure that each specific objective contains only one aspect of the study.
Use action oriented words or verbs when writing your objectives. The objectives should start
with words such as ‘to determine’, ‘to find out’, ‘to ascertain’, ‘to measure’ and ‘to explore’. The
way the main and specific objectives are worded determine how your research is classified (e.g.
descriptive, co-relational or experimental). In other words, the wording of your objectives
determines the type of research design you need to adopt to achieve them.
If your study is primarily descriptive, your main objective should clearly describe the
major focus of your study even mentioning the organisation and its location unless these
are to be kept confidential (e.g. to describe the types of treatment program provided
by…. [name of the organization].
If your study is co-relational in nature, in addition to the above three properties, the
wording of the main objective should include the main variables being co-related.
If the overall thrust of your study is to test a hypothesis, the wording of main objectives,
in addition to the above, should indicate the direction of the relationship being tested.
6. Hypothesis
6.1. Introduction
Simple specific and conceptually clear: There is no place for ambiguity in the
construction of a hypothesis, as ambiguity will make the verification of your hypothesis
almost impossible. If should be unidimensional. That is it should test only one
relationship on hunch at a time to be able to develop a good hypothesis you must be
familiar with the subject are. The more insight you have into a problem the easier it is to
construct a hypothesis.
A hypothesis should be capable of verification: Methods and techniques must be
available for data collection and analysis. There is no point in formulating a hypothesis if
it cannot be subjected to verification because there are no techniques to verify it.
However this does not necessarily means that you should not formulate a hypothesis for
which there are no methods of verification.
A hypothesis should be operational is sable this means that it can be expressed in terms
that can be measured it cannot be measured, it cannot be tested and no conclusion can
be drawn.
As explained any assumption that you seek to validate through on inquiry is called a
hypothesis. Hence, theoretically these should be only one type of hypothesis that is the
researcher hypothesis. .Hypotheses are classified in several ways:
7. Sampling
7.1. Introduction
The first objective of sampling is to make an inference about an unknown parameter from a
measurable sample statistic. The second aim of sampling is to test a statistical hypothesis
relating to population. A sample is drawn and the data collected from the sample informants are
analysed and on the basis of the result the hypothesis may be accepted or rejected. In making
this decision of census or sampling, the following factors are considered:
The size of the population: If the population to be studied is relatively small, the investigator
may decide to study the entire population. The task is easily manageable and the sampling may
not be required. But if the population to be studied is quite large, sampling is warranted.
However, the size is a relative matter. Whether a population is large or small depends upon the
undertaken and the time and other resources available for it.
Facilities: The extent of facilities available, staff, access to computer facility and accessibility to
population elements is another factor to be considered in deciding to sample or not, when the
availability of these facilities is extensive, census survey may be manageable. Otherwise,
sampling is preferable.
Time: The time limit within which the study should be completed is another important factor, to
be considered in deciding the question of census or sample survey. This, in fact, is a primary
reason for using sampling by academic and marketing researchers.
Sampling techniques or methods may be classified into two generic types (a) probability or
random sampling and (b) nonprobability or non-random sampling.
Purpose of the survey: What does the researcher aim at? If he intends to generalize the
findings based on the sample survey to the population, then an appropriate probability
sampling method must be selected.
Measurability: The application of statistical inference theory requires computation of the
sampling error from the sample itself probability sample only allow such computation.
Degree of Precision: Should the results of the survey be very precise, or even rough
results could serve the purpose? The desired level of precision is one of the criteria of
sampling method selection.
Information about population: How much information is available about the population to
be studied?
The nature of the population: In terms of the variables to be studied is the population
homogeneous for heterogeneous?
8. Questionnaire design
Questionnaire design is one of the important areas of research. It is most commonly used. The
accuracy and relevancy of data collected depends upon the questionnaire. There are certain
functions, which a questionnaire performs and these are:
Given to the respondent clear idea and understanding of the questions. Questions
should not be vague.
Motivate the respondents to give answers
Stimulate the responses
How respondent should answer, clear cut instructions
Information must be treated confidential
The key point to remember about questionnaire design is to make the interview possible for all
those using the document. It has to have the following characteristics:
A Logical Sequence: This is important as the questions much follow on logically. If they do, the
interviewer will establish and maintain a rapport and collect the data required without
interruptions caused by inappropriate construction or repetitive questions.
Good Wording: The successful questions or the questions that ensure that a survey is
successful are those that are shortly, specific, clear and unambiguous. Try to help the informant
by specifying clearly what you want to evaluate and where possible show examples an
illustration with detailed descriptions.
Write a clear layout: A questionnaire is working document. A question, the possible list of a
answers preceded in the questionnaire, the instructions to the interviewers, and the
analysis instructions all have to be clear so the interviewer does not get confused or reads out
the wrong words.
Attitudes, opinions and image are generally measured by developing scale. Verbal scales are
mere easily understood than numerical scales or making a rating which takes a score out of ten.
There are also different options for scales:
Unipolar scales. A five-point scale from ‘good’ to ‘not very good’
Bipolar scale. A five-point scale from ‘very good’ to ‘very bad’
Rating scale base on getting some type of agreement to statements. ‘Agree strongly,
agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree and disagree strongly provides this analysis.
a) Close Ended: Question in which respondent selects one or more options from pre-
determined set of responses YES or NO
Questionnaire should be brief to the point and as small as possible. It should meet the desired
objectives. A good questionnaire is one which examines the habits, awareness,
attitudes and needs of an informant and how all of these relate. In this way consumer behaviour
can be analysed, understood and even simulated to predict now it could change. Questionnaire
design is an art and not a science, and therefore, it depends on an individual’s creative power to
get it right.
9. Methods and techniques of data collection
9.1. Introduction
Once the researcher has decided the ‘Research Design’, the next job is of data collection for
data to useful, our observations need to be organized so that we can pick out patterns and
come to logical conclusion. Statistical investigation requires systematic collection of data so that
all relevant groups are represented in the data.
Secondary Data: When an investigator uses the data which has already been collected by
others, such data is called secondary data. This data is primary data for the agency that
collected it and becomes secondary data for someone else who uses this data for his own
purposes. The secondary data can be obtained from journals, reports, government publications,
publication of professional and research organization and so on. For example, if a researcher
desires to analyse the weather conditions of different regions, he can get the required
information or data from the records of the meteorology department.
II. In-depth Interviews: According to Taylor and Bogdon, in-depth interviewing is, ‘repeated
face-to-face encounter between the researcher and informants directed towards
understanding informants’ perspectives on their lives, experiences, or situations as
expressed in their own worlds’.
III. Focus Group Interviews: The only difference between a focus group interview and an
in-depth interview is that the former is undertaken with a group and the latter with an
individual. In a focus group interview ; your explore the perceptions, experiences and
understandings of an group of people who have some experience in common with regard to
a situation or event.
IV. Narratives: The narrative technique of gathering information has even less structure that
the focus group. Narratives have almost no predetermined contents expect that the
researcher seeks to near the personal experience of a person with an incident of happening
in her/his life. Essentially, the person tells his/her story about an incident or situation and
you, as the researcher, listen passively. Basically, you let the person talk freely and without
interrupting.
V. Oral Histories: Oral histories, like narratives, involve the use of both
19 | P a g e Course notes for B-Tech_RP_IPRCKigali
Lecturer: Assiel Mugabe
passive and active listening. Oral histories, however, are more commonly used for learning
about a historical even or episode that took place in the past of for gaining information about
a cultural, custom or story that has been passed from generation to generation. Narratives
are more about a person’s personal experiences whereas, historical, social or cultural
events are the subjects of oral histories.
10.1. Introduction
Data interpretation is a crucial step in research. Data should not be studies in isolation of all
factors which might influence the origin of the data. Any decision taken needs a holistic
overview of paraphernalia factors associated with the subject in concern.
The data which is collected for the purpose of the study itself cannot several any things. This
being a raw data it is required to process and analysed in order to have desired result. The data
which is collected cannot be directly use for making analysis. Before analysis data requires to
be processed.
Data processing is a crucial stage in research. After collecting the data from the field, the
researcher has to process and analyse them in order to arrive at certain conclusion which may
confirm or invalidate the hypothesis which he had formulated towards the beginning of his
research worth. The mass of data collected during the field work is to be processed with a view
to reducing them to manageable proportions. The processing of data includes editing, coding,
classification and tabulation. The data which is collected is analysed with an object checking of
data, and reducing this data into manageable proportions. Data collected should be organized in
such way so that table charts can be prepared for presentation.
A. Editing: The process of examining the collected data is called editing. This includes
inspection and schedule. There is possibility of error and omission in the on the part of
investigator so the editing help us to minimise such correctness. Editing is done at the
time of collecting data.
B. Coding: It is the process of assignment numerals or other symbols to answers so that
responses can be put into a limited number of categories or classes.
E. Data analysis: The data collected may or may not in numerical form. Even if data is not
in numerical form still we can carry out qualitative analysis based on the experiences of
individual participants. When data is collected in numerical form than through descriptive
statistics findings can be summarised. This includes measure of central tendency like
mean range etc. Another way to summarised finding is by means of graphs and charts.
Analysis involves estimating the values of unknown parameters of the population and
testing hypothesis for drawing inferences. The common types of analysis are:
Quantitative Analysis: The numerical data collected in study through descriptive statistics
analysis can be conducted through measure of central tendency.
Descriptive Analysis: This analysis of one variable is called one dimensional analysis. This
analysis measures condition at particular time.
Sequential Analysis: When only factor is revel in the table at one time, this type of analysis is
called sequential analysis. It is concerned with study of one variable affecting another one.
Inferential Analysis: In order to decide the validity of data to indicate conclusion this analysis is
concerned with tests for significance of hypothesis. One the basis of inferential analysis the task
of interpretation is performed by estimating the population values.
a. Arithmetic Mean
Example:
Short-cut method of computing mean: The direct method of computing means as shown above
is used only when the items are not very large and their values are also small. If, however, the
series is large and or the values are big, them a short-cut method may be resorted to minimise
the calculate task.
In the short cut method, try to adopt the usual procedure of calculating mean by abbreviating the
given data, on the basis of the deviation of the mid-point (m) of class intervals in a given
frequency distribution from an arbitrary chosen value of (m) as a starting point
designated as (a)
In the short cut method, a is adopted as an arbitrary starting point for computation work. Many
statisticians refer as guess mean or assumed mean. The following formula is used:
Where
x = mean
a = assumed mean
f = frequencies
d = (m-a) i.e. deviations of mid-point value from the value of arbitrary origin and n f (number
of items) Needless to say that in the case of discrete distribution,
D=x–a
Where, x is the variate
Applying into the example:
Solution:
Median is value of item that goes to divide the series into equal pasts. It may be defined as the
value of that item which divides the series into two equal parts one half containing values
greater than it and the other half containing values less than it. Therefore the series has to be
arranged in ascending or descending order before finding the median. When all the
observations are arranged in ascending or descending order, then the median is the magnitude
of the middle case, if has half the observation above it and half below it.
If there are ‘n’ observations of the variate and they are arranged in ascending order then is
given by:
If the value ‘n’ is odd on the other hand if ‘n’ is even the median is taken as the average
Example:
The following are the marks obtained by 9 students. Find out the median marks.
c. Mode
Mode is the value of variable which is repeated the greatest number of times in the series. It is
the usual and not casual size of item in a series. It lies at the position of greatest density. Mode
is the value that occurs most frequently, in a frequency histogram or frequency polygon, it is the
observed value corresponding to the high point of the graph. However, the mode is not a rigidly
25 | P a g e Course notes for B-Tech_RP_IPRCKigali
Lecturer: Assiel Mugabe
defined measure. In fact mode is the most unstable average and its true value is difficult to
determine.
For example, the recorded observations are:
(a) 2, 3, 2, 4 ,5, 2, 7, 6, 2, 4, 2
Here, 2 occurs most frequently,
Hence mode = 2
(b) 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 5, 2, 3, 2
In this case 2 and 3 both occur equal number of times, hence there are two modes.
Mean, Median and Mode have their distinct role in statistical analysis. In no case they can be
substituted for on another.
The word dispersion, literally, means deviation, difference or spread over of certain values from
their central value. Further, the word measure means a method of measuring or ascertaining
certain values. Thus the phrase measures of dispersion means the various possible methods of
measuring the dispersions or deviations of the different values from a designated value of a
series.
The designated value may be an average value or any other extreme value.
The main objects of measuring dispersion are as:
a) Range
Range is the simplest method of calculating dispersion. It is defined as the difference between
the largest and the smallest values of the data.
b. Quartile Deviation
It is nothing but a ‘semi-inter quartile range’. With some modification, it is similar to the range. In
the distribution, we consider Q3 as the largest value and Q, as the smallest. It means
the items below the lower quartile and the items above the upper quartile are not at all included
in the computation. Thus we are considering only the middle half portion of the data.
27 | P a g e Course notes for B-Tech_RP_IPRCKigali
Lecturer: Assiel Mugabe
Thus the Quartile deviation measures the difference between the values of Q, and Q3 it is
denoted symbolically by ‘Q.D’.
Example:
Calculate the quartile deviation and its coefficient from the following figures of daily expenses of
seven boys Rs. 18, 20, 35, 41, 25, 15, 13.
Solution:
Arrange the data in ascending order: 13, 15, 18, 20, 28, 35, 41.
Example:
Calculate the Mean Deviation and its coefficient from the following data.
First locate the median and then take the deviation of each value
from the median with positive sign. The median of the series is 280.
Of all the measures of dispersion, standard deviation is the most important. it is based upon all
observations and hence, is more reliable than any other. It is
defined as the square root of the arithmetic mean of the squares of the deviations from the
mean, sometimes it is therefore, called the root mean square deviation. It is denoted by
symbolically. If is the mean of the n observation xi , then:
f. Coefficient of Variation
The standard deviation as defined above is an absolute measure of dispersion. Though it shows
the variability of actual values from their arithmetic mean of the data, it can hardly be used
comparing the variability of different groups. For comparison we need a relative measure. For
the matter, one way of achieving a pure number would be to find the ratio of standard deviation
to the mean. This is called “The coefficient of standard deviation”.
A still better way to compare the variability of different groups is to express this ratio in
percentage. This is called coefficient of variation.
From the following data calculate the standard deviation and the coefficient of variation.
Students’ marks in Research Methodology: 40, 48, 50, 53, 58, 60, 66, 70, 72, 73.
Correlation means “the study of existence and the magnitude and direction of variation
between two or more variables”.
Most of the variables in practice are correlated. If we can find the degree and direction of
correlation between such variables, it can help us to predict to control and to plan our
activities for future. Thus, correlation helps:
One of the simplest methods of studying correlation between two variables is to construct a
scatter diagram.
The method of scatter diagram is descriptive in nature and gives only a general idea of
correlation. The most commonly used method which gives a mathematical expression for
correlation is the one suggested by Karl Person.
But this will depend upon the units of x and y. To find a ratio which is independent of these
units, we divide it by the quantities of the same order that is by x. y with this view in mind Karl
Person suggested in 1890 the following coefficient of correlation between x
and y.
or
Regression means returning of stepping back to the average value with the help of values of
one variable we values of one variable we can establish most likely values of other variable.
On the basis of two available correlated variables, we can forecast the future data or events or
values. In statistics, the term ‘regression’ means simply the average relationship. We can
predict or estimate the value of dependent variable from the given related value of independent
variable with the help of regression technique.
Example:
Find the angle between the lines of regression using the following data:
n=10, 𝐸𝑥 = 270 𝐸𝑦 = 630 𝑥 = 4 𝑦 =5 µ𝑥𝑦 = 0.6
A time series is set of ordered observation of a quantitative variable taken at successive point in
time in terms of year, month, weeks, day or hours e.g. annual data of a company
production in a country.
This analysis identifies four kinds of charge or variation in the given phenomenon-
The combined influence of all the four components is often represented by a multiplicative
model.
Y = T C S I or Y=T+C+S+I
The time series analysis aims at measuring each of this kind of variation. When one kind of
variation is measured, the other kinds are eliminated from the series.
Of the four kinds of variation in time series the secular trend represents its long-term direction.
The past trend may be used to evaluate the success or failure of a policy or program, and also
to predict the future patterns. A trend may be lines, curvilinear or straight line.
There are various methods of isolating the trend from the given series, viz, the free hand
method, semi-average method, moving average method and the method of least squares.
The last two methods are more important.
The Moving Average Method: This method of measuring trend is based upon the idea that
if the value of that if the values of the series for a sufficient period of time are averaged, the
influence of shorter-term fluctuations will be eliminated. This is one of the methods aiming at
elimination of seasonal variations.
A moving average is computed by adding the values for number of year both before and after to
the value for the year for which the average is being obtained and then dividing the total
value by the total number of years included. The curve joining the point shows the rising or
declining trend.
See the following table.
Method of Least Squares: This method is the most popular method of computing the secular
trend in a time series. This is used far fitting a line cove of best fit. The least squares method
gives a formula for getting the straight line that will best fit the data the equation of straight line
is expressed:
Where:
The important function in research is formulation of hypothesis. The entire research activity is
directed towards making of hypothesis. Research can begin with well formulated hypothesis
or if may be the end product in research work. Hypothesis gives us guidelines for an
investigation to the basis of previous available information. In absence of this research will be
called underquired data and may eliminate required one. Thus hypothesis is an assumption
which can be put to test to decide its validity.
Hypothesis testing is a systematic method. It is used to evaluate the data collected. This serve
as aid in the process of decision making, the testing of hypotheses conducted through several
steps which are given below.
The alternative hypothesis presents the alternative to null hypotheses. It includes the statement
of inequality. The null hypotheses are and alternative hypotheses are complimentary. The null
hypothesis is the statement that is believed to be correct through analysis which is based on
these null hypotheses. For example, the null hypotheses might state the average are for
entering management institute is 20 years. So average age for institute entry = 20 years
The appropriate test statistic which is to be used in statistic, which is to be used in statistical
hypotheses testing, is based on various characteristics of sample population of interest
including sample size and distribution.
The statistical test can assume many numerical values. As the value of statistical test has
significant on decision one must use the appropriate statistic in order to obtain meaningful
results.
The formula to be used while testing population means is.
Z - Test statistic,
x - Mean of sample
- mean of population,
- Standard deviation,
n – Number of sample
As already explain, null hypothesis can be rejected or fail to reject null hypotheses. A null
hypothesis that is rejected may in really be true or false. A null hypothesis that fails to be
rejected may in reality be true or false. The outcome that a researcher desires is to reject false
null hypotheses or fail to reject true null hypotheses. However there is always possibility of
rejecting a true hypotheses or failing to reject false hypotheses.
The probability of committing a type I error is termed as A and Type II error is termed as B.
Decision Rule
Before collection and analyses of data it is necessary to decide under which conditions the null
hypotheses will be rejected or fail to he rejected. The decision rule can be stated in terms of
computed test statistics or in probabilistic terms. The same decision will he applicable any of the
method so selected.
In research process at early stage method of data collection is decided. Once the research
problem is decided the decision in respect to type and sources of data should be taken.
The decision will provide base for processing and analysing of data. It is advisable to make use
of approved methods of research for collecting and analysing of data.
The decision regarding null hypotheses is an important step in the process of the decision rule.
Under the said decision rule one has to reject or fail to reject the null hypotheses. If null
hypothesis is rejected than alternative hypotheses can be accepted. If one fails to reject null
hypotheses one can only suggest that null hypotheses may be true.
In the case of testing of hypotheses, above referred both terms are quite important and they
must be clearly understood. A two failed test rejects the null hypotheses if the sample mean is
significantly higher or lower than the hypothesized value of mean of the population.
Such a test is appropriate, when the null hypotheses is some specified value and the alternate
hypotheses is a value not equal to the specified value and the alternative hypotheses
is value not equal to the specified value of null hypotheses.
a. Setting up of Hypotheses
This step consists of hypotheses setting. In this step format statement in relation to hypotheses
in made. Hypotheses should be clearly stated in respect of the nature of the research problem.
There are hypotheses are Null hypotheses and Alternative hypotheses.
Acceptance or rejection of hypotheses is based on the sampling information. Any sample which
we draw from the population will vary from it therefore it is necessary to judge
whether there difference are statistically significant or insignificant. The formulation of
hypotheses is an important step which must be accomplished and necessary care should be
taken as per the requirement and object of the research problem under
construction. This should also specify the whether one failed or two failed test will be used.
f. Performance Computation
In this step calculation of performance is done. The calculation includes testing statistics and
standard error. A hypothesis is tested for the following four possibilities that the hypotheses is:
g. Statistical Decision
This is the step in which we have to draw statistical decision involving the acceptance or
rejection of hypotheses. This will be dependent on whether the calculated value of
the test falls in the region of acceptance or in the region of rejection at given significance level.
If a hypothesis is tested at 5% level and observed set recorded the possibilities less than 5%
level than we considered difference between hypothetical parameter and sample statistics is
significant.
1. The Z – Test
It is based on the normal distribution. It is widely used for testing the significance of several
statistics such as mean, median, mode, coefficient of correlation and others. This test is used
even when binominal distribution or t distribution is applicable on the presumption that such a
distribution lends to approximate normal distribution as the sample size (n) become larger.
2. The T – Test
The T – Test is also known as student’s t – test. It is suitable for testing the significance of a
sample man or for judging the significance of difference between the mams of two samples,
when the samples are less than 30 in number and when the population variance is not known.
When two samples are related, the paired t – test is used. The t – test can also be used for
testing the significance of the coefficient of simple and partial correlation. In determining
whether the mean of a sample drawn from a normal population deviates significantly from a
stated value when variance of population is unknown, we calculate the statistic.
Let us make the hypothesis that the sample mean does not differ significantly from the intended
weight of 16 kg applying t – test.
(For v: consult the table value for t-test and find the related T-value)
3. The f- test
The f – test is based on f – distribution (which is a distribution skewed to the right, and tends to
be more symmetrical, as the number of degrees of freedom in the numerator and
denominator increases) The f- test is used to compare the variances of two independent sample
means at a time. It is also used for judging the significance of multiple correlation coefficients.
The non-parametric tests are population free tests, as they are not based on the characteristics
of population. They do not specify normally distributed population or equal variances. They are
easy to understand and to use. The important non- parametric tests are:
The Chi-Square test is the most popular non-parametric test of significance in social science
research. It is used to make comparisons between two or more nominal variables. Unlike the
other test of significance, the chi-square is used to make comparisons between frequencies
rather than between mean scares. This test evaluated whether the difference between the
observed frequencies and the expected frequencies under the null hypothesis can be attributed
to chance or actual population differences. A chi-square value is obtained by formula.
In this information we can say, variance of distribution of sample of 7 persons was drawn is
equal to weight of 30 kg. Test this at 5% of 1% level of significance.
12.1. Introduction
A research report is a formal statement of the research process and its results. It narrates the
problem studied, methods used for studying it and the findings and conclusions of the study.
The purpose of a research report is to communicate to interested persons the methodology and
the results of the study in such a manner as to enable them to understand the research process
and to determine the validity of the conclusions. The aim of the report is not to convince the
reader of the value of the result, but to convey to him what was done, why it was done, aid what
was its outcome. It is so written that the reader himself can reach his own conclusions as to the
adequacy of the study and the validity of the reported results and conclusions.
1. It serves as a means for presenting the problem studied methods and techniques used for
collecting and analysing data, the findings, conclusions and recommendations, in an
organised manner.
2. It serves as a basic reference material for future use in developing research proposals in the
same or related area.
3. A report serves as a means for judging the quality of the completed research project.
5. It provides factual base for formulating policies and strategies relating to the subject matter
studied.
6. It provides systematic knowledge on problems and issues analysed.
Research reports may be classified into (a) technical report (b) popular report, (c) interim report,
(d) summary report, (e) research abstract, and (f) research article.
These types of reports vary from one another in terms of the degree of formality, physical form,
scope, style and size.
After the data analysis is over, report writing cannot be started abruptly. It requires careful
preplanning. This planning process involves the following considerations and steps.
As a research report is a means of communication we have to consider some basic questions,
which determine the effectiveness of communication, namely, ‘who’ says ‘what’ to whom in
which was with what effect.
The academic or scientific community will be the primary target audience in the following
cases: (1) When the research is undertaken as an academic exercise for a master’s degree or
M. Phil. Degree or Ph.D. degree (in this case the thesis evaluation committee members will be
the immediate target audience), (2) when a research student or social scientist plants to publish
his research output in the form of a research monograph: (3) when a researcher plans to write
research articles based on his research for publication in professional journals. (in the last two
cases, the references, and the fellow scientists interested in the study will be
the target audience).
The sponsors of research may consist of two categories: (1) research promotion bodies like
Indian Council of Social Science Research, the University Grants Commission; and educational
foundations which provide Financial support to social scientists working in universities and
colleges for undertaking research with a view to encouraging them to do research; and (2)
government department, industrial and other organization which sponsor research for their own
use in policy making and the like.
If the research is sponsored by a research promotion organization, the reporting has to follow its
prevalent norms. In general, a full-fledged technical report is expected, along with an
abstract of the report. When the research is sponsored by an organization for its own use, it has
to be reported according to its requirements. It is to be written as a private document
emphasizing the findings and recommendations rather than methodology.
The general public is viewed as a cross-section of the society. This lay audience may be
interested in the broad findings and the implications of research studies on socio-economic
problems. The reporting for his audience may be in the form of a summary report or an article
written in non-technical journalistic language.
H. Outline/table of controls:
The final step in planning report writing is to prepare a detailed outline for each of the proposed
chapters of the report. An outline lends cohesiveness and direction to report writing wok. Until
an outline is prepared the researcher does not know that he has to do and how to organise the
presentation.
Title Page: The title page is the first page of a research report. It carries (1) the title of the study
(2) the name of the degree for which it is submitted (3) the name of the author, (4) the name of
the institution on which the report is submitted and the data of presentation.
Research Supervisor’s Certificate: In the case of a student’s research’s work , his research
supervision has to certify that is was a record of independent research work done by the
students.
List of tables: This comes after the table of contents. It is presented in the
following format:
All the tables may be numbered serially as 1,2,3,4 in one continuous series, or tables in each
chapter may be given a separate serial order as 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 for tables in chapter 1;2, 1,2,2, 2.3,
2.4 for tables in chapter 2: and so on.
Body of the Report: After the prefatory items, the body of the report is presented.
It is the major and main part of the report. It covers the formulation of the problem studied,
methodology, findings and discussion and a summary of the findings and recommendations. In
a comprehensive report the body of the report will consist of several chapters.
1. Introduction:
This is the first chapter in the body of a research report, it is devoted for introducing the
theoretical background of the problem, its definition and formulation. It may consist of the
following sections.
(a) Theoretical background of the topic: The first task is to introduce the background and the
nature of the problem so as to place into a larger context to enable the reader to know its
significance in a proper perspective. This section summarises the theory or conceptual frame
work within which the problem has been investigated.
(b) The statement of the problem: In this section, why and how the problem was selected are
stated, the problem is clearly defined and its facets and significance are pointed out.
(c)Review of Literature: This is an important part of the introductory chapter. It is devoted for
making a brief review of previous studies on the problem and significant writings on the topic
under study. This review provides summary of the current state of knowledge in the area of
investigation. Which aspects have been investigated, what research gaps exist and how the
present study is an attempt to fill in that gap are highlighted. Thus the underlying purpose is to
locate the present research in the existing body of research on the subject and to point out what
it contributes to the subject.
(e) The objectives of the study: The objectives of the study and the investigative questions
relating to each of the objectives are presented.
(f) Hypotheses: The specific hypotheses to be tested are stated. The sources of their
formulation may be indicated.
(g) Definition of concepts: The reader of a report is not equipped to understand the study unless
he can know what concepts are used and how they are used. Therefore, the
operational definitions of the key concept and variables of the study are presented giving
justifications for the definitions adopted. How those concepts were defined by earlier writers and
how the definitions of the researcher were an improvement over earlier definitions may be
explained.
(h) Models: The models, if any, developed for depicting the relationships between variables
under study are presented with a review of their theoretical or conceptual basis. The underlying
assumptions are also stated.
(a) Methodology: In this section, the overall typology of research (i.e. experimental, survey, case
study or action research) used, and the data collection methods (i.e. observation,
interviewing or mailing) employed are described. The sources of data the sampling plan and
other aspects of the design may be presented under separate subheadings as described below.
(b) Sources of Data: the sources from which the secondary and or primary data were gathered
are stated in the case of primary data. The universe of the study and the unit of study are clearly
defined. The limitations of the secondary data should be indicated.
(c) Sampling Plan: The size of the universe from which the sample was drawn, the sampling
methods adopted and the sample size and the process of sampling are described in this
section. What were originally planned and what were actually achieved and
the estimate of sampling error are to be given. These details are crucial for determining the
limitations of generalisability of the findings.
(d) Data-collection Instruments: The types of instruments used for data collection and their
contents, scales and other devices used for measuring variables, and the procedure of
establishing their validity and reliability are described in this section.
(f) Data processing and analysis plan: The method manual or mechanical adopted for data
processing, and an account of methods used for data analysis and testing hypotheses must be
outlined and justified. If common methods like chi-square test, correlation test and analysis of
variance were used, it is sufficient to say such and such methods were used. If an unusual or
complex method was used. It should be described in sufficient detail with the formula to enable
the reader to understand it.
(g) An overview of the report: The scheme of subsequent chapters is stated and the purpose of
each of them is briefly described in this section in order to give an overview of the presentation
of the result of the study.
(h) Limitations of the study: No research is free from limitations and weaknesses. These arise
from methodological weaknesses, sampling, imperfections, non-responses, data inadequacies,
measurement deficiencies and the like. Such limitations may vitiate the conclusions and their
generalisability. Therefore, a careful statement of the limitations and weaknesses of
the study should be made in order to enable the reader to judge the validity of the conclusions
and the general worth of the study in the proper perspective. A frank statement of limitations is
one of the hallmarks of an honest and competent researcher.
(B)TERMINAL ITEMS
Bibliography: This is the first of the terminal items presented at the end of
the research report. The bibliography lists in alphabetical order all published and unpublished
reference used by the writer in preparing the report. All books articles and reports and other
documents may be presented in one common list in the alphabetical order of their authors
alternatively bibliography may be classified into three or four sections: (a) books (b) articles (c)
reports, and (d) other documents, and in each section relevant references may be arranged in
alphabetical order.
Exploratory research plays a role in the initial phases of research, particularly when dealing with unfamiliar problems by gaining preliminary insights and information. However, it is limited as it does not aim to test specific hypotheses but rather explores what is available. It is essentially a starting point that helps in developing more precise research questions and hypotheses for further detailed studies .
Academic objectives aim at developing new concepts or adding knowledge primarily for educational and theoretical advancement. In contrast, utility objectives focus on the practical application of research to inform policy and benefit society economically or socially. Both types are important as they complement each other by fostering knowledge advancement and practical solutions for societal issues .
Research contributes to decision-making by providing evidence-based insights that aid in developing logical and effective strategies and policies. It involves critical thinking and analyses which assist businesses and policymakers in understanding complex situations, predicting outcomes, and deciding on informed actions. Additionally, research serves as a basis for innovation, product development, and policy formation, which are pivotal for business growth and societal progress .
Type I error occurs when a true null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected, while a Type II error happens when a false null hypothesis fails to be rejected. These errors can significantly affect research conclusions as they lead to incorrect interpretations—in the first case, by mistakenly identifying a difference or effect, and in the second, by missing an actual one. Each type of error impacts the reliability and validity of the research findings .
Periodic verification is critical as it ensures the data collection and research activities align with the original research design and objectives. It helps in identifying and correcting deviations or errors early in the process, safeguarding the integrity and reliability of the research findings. Regular checks and follow-ups are essential for maintaining data quality and validity .
The moving average method smooths out short-term fluctuations in data by averaging values over a stipulated period, effectively eliminating seasonal variations. By doing so, it highlights longer-term trends, allowing analysts to identify consistent patterns over time, which assists in making reliable forecasts for future trends in business or economic contexts .
Writing a research report is vital for communicating the process, findings, and significance of research work transparently. It ensures that the research can be reproduced and verified by others, contributing to scientific knowledge proliferation. The main challenge lies in systematically organizing complex data and insights clearly and succinctly for diverse audiences. Effective report writing allows findings to reach stakeholders, enhancing their potential utility in decision-making .
A robust research process is characterized by the ability to withstand critical scrutiny, ensuring that it is foolproof and free from errors. Empirical evidence is crucial because it provides hard evidence based on real-life observations or experiences, which supports the validity and correctness of the conclusions drawn, allowing them to be verified by the researcher and others .
Formulating a hypothesis is essential as it provides a focused statement or assumption to be tested, guiding the whole investigation process. It serves as a foundation from which research activities are directed to evaluate assumptions via collected data. Hypotheses help in structuring research design, determining data collection methods, and analyzing data to draw meaningful conclusions .
Applied research is distinct from pure research as it focuses on addressing specific real-world problems requiring immediate solutions or decisions. It is pragmatic and action-oriented, often leading to direct practical applications and policy formulations that aim to resolve societal or industrial challenges. In contrast, pure research seeks to expand theoretical knowledge without immediate application .