Safety Risk Management Program Guide
Safety Risk Management Program Guide
A INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1
B. DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................... 2
4-i
6.2008
CHAPTER 4 - SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
A INTRODUCTION
1. SI policy (SD 419) is to “ensure that all alleged hazardous conditions are
investigated, that identified safety and health risks are properly assessed and
controlled….” Operating environments of the SI comprise a wide variety of
health and safety risks that can never be totally eliminated. However, through
the application of effective risk management principles and resources,
associated risks can be reduced to acceptable levels.
2. This Chapter describes the Risk Management decision-making process that
shall serve as the SI foundation of a strong and effective Safety, Health and
Environmental Management Program to accomplish these policy goals.
3. This Chapter (together with Chapter 5, “Safety Assessments, Log of
Deficiencies and Corrective Action Plan” of this Manual), contains tools and
techniques developed to enable Directors to accomplish all of the aspects of
this policy. Attachments to this Chapter provide spreadsheets, hazard
analyses and checklists that will aid Directors, supervisors, Safety
Coordinators and safety committees in performing the duties necessary to
comply with this policy.
4. The goal of risk management is to accomplish a balance between
performance at the height of one’s potential and still maintain a safe working
environment effectively controlling known hazards. Compliance with existing
codes and federal, state and local regulations is often viewed as being quite
expensive to implement. However, the cost of not complying is also great.
The Smithsonian’s 2006 costs owed the Office of Workers Compensation
Program of present and past injuries exceeded $3 million. Compliance with
standards, ensuring availability of sufficient resources for a strong and
effective safety program will save millions of dollars as well as keep our
workforce and environment healthy and safe. This systematic, decision-
making process is a proven highly effective method for reducing mishaps that
has been used extensively by organizations such as NASA and the
Department of Defense and now for reducing injuries to the Smithsonian’s
employees and visitors.
4-1
6.2008
B. DEFINITIONS
1. Deficiency is an uncontrolled hazard that poses risk of injury, property or
environmental damage and demonstrates non-compliance with SI Safety
Policy and/or consensus standards.
2. A hazard is a condition with the potential to cause injury, illness, or death of
personnel; damage to or loss of equipment, property or collections; or
curtailment of operations.
3. Risk is the probability that the hazard will actually cause injury or damage.
Many hazards are Inherent to the workplace or process or piece of equipment
used to accomplish our mission, but risk can be reduced by deciding on ways
to change or control the hazard (controlling the equipment, using safer
materials, doing the process in a safer manner) and still accomplish the
facility’s mission.
4. Risk Management (RM) is the process that guides management decisions to
a safer workplace.
4-2
6.2008
c. Step 3- Develop controls and make decisions on what risks are
acceptable
(1) Develop Job Hazard Analyses (JHA) and Workplace (WHA) (refer to
examples in Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4 of this Chapter), to eliminate or
minimize the risks to an acceptable level to meet the requirements of
this Manual. Hazards that are judged to be immediately dangerous
to life and health must be controlled immediately (e.g., process or
equipment shut-down).
(2) Frequently interact with and observe the employee to ensure the
employee knows and understands the requirements of the job and
workplace hazard analysis and performs safely. Refer to Attachment 6,
Job Observation Form.
(3) Apply controls listed in the applicable Operational Chapters of this
Manual.
(4) Provide Safety Training, per the requirements of Chapter 6, “Training”,
of this Manual, to raise employee awareness of workplace hazards the
means to guard against being injured by those hazards.
(5) Develop Risk Management Worksheets (refer to example in
Attachment 5 of this Chapter) for specific operations that involve
multiple hazards; e.g. installing large objects in an exhibit, moving
collections for storage or because of renovation, etc.
d. Step 4- Implement controls and track corrective actions through
completion.
(1) Maintain a current and fully auditable Log of Deficiencies and
Corrective Action Plan, per tools and techniques presented in
Chapter 5, “Safety Assessments, Log of Deficiencies and Corrective
Action Plan”, of this Manual.
(2) Assign personnel to track deficiency abatement.
(3) Review JHAs and/or WHAs regularly and change whenever
personnel/processes change, or new hazards are introduced into the
workplace.
(4) Fellow employees should periodically use the Job Observation Form,
Attachment 6 to ensure safe behavior
e. Step 5- Periodically evaluate the effectiveness of this 5-step risk
management process. Drop controls that clearly do not work and continue
to develop controls that do work. When there are changes in the
environment, reassess the heightened risk that change usually causes.
Continue to evaluate the deficiency abatement process.
4-3
6.2008
3. Employees shall provide input in their JHA and will adhere to the safe work
practices identified for each task and periodically review the JHA to either
improve it or change it to accommodate changes in procedures or
environment.
4. Office of Safety, Health and Environmental Management (OSHEM) shall:
a. Provide technical assistance and a “Train-the-Trainer” course, upon
request, to Directors and Safety Coordinators in all aspects of the Risk
Management process.
b. Conduct and manage all aspects of employee health exposure
assessments and medical surveillance to meet regulatory standards for
quality assurance, quality control, and legal liability.
c. Evaluate the facility or organization’s Safety Risk Management Program
annually for compliance with this Chapter.
4-4
6.2008
Attachment 1
4-5
6.2008
Attachment 1
Figure 4-1 illustrates how these five steps are cyclical, forming a continual improvement
process with the first two steps being part of the assessment phase and the last three
steps belonging to management to make decisions, delegate responsibilities and
continually supervise and evaluate to insure improvement.
Figure 4-1
4-6
6.2008
Attachment 1
Table 4-1 Graphic display of the RM 5-step Process and identifies specific tools
and techniques for accomplishing the program requirements.
4-7
6.2008
Attachment 1
Each job task or work area within a facility shall be assessed by the supervisor (with
assistance from the Safety Coordinator) to identify sources (e.g., locations, equipment,
processes, etc.) of safety hazards. Individual hazards are identified by answering the
questions: “What could go wrong, what could cause someone to be hurt or cause
damage to property or environment?” This determination may be made using:
• Brainstorming with staff, seeking staff input on unsafe aspects of their operations,
considering “what if” scenarios.
• Self assessments/inspections.
• Employee complaints of unsafe working conditions.
• Identifying past injuries or locations where injuries occur including review of
OSHA 300 Log information
• Injuries or incidents other similar organizations have experienced.
• Relying on professionals experienced in identifying hazards for specific jobs or
environments.
• Results of employee exposure monitoring (industrial hygiene surveys).
• Identifying locations or processes that could cause an environmental release or
environmental pollution.
What is a hazard? A hazard is a condition with the potential to cause injury, illness,
or death of personnel, damage to or loss of equipment, property or collections,
damage to the environment, or curtailment of operations. A hazard may also be a
situation or event that could cause a museum or research center to close or stop
vital operations. Hazards exist in all environments—laboratories, collection storage,
workshops, warehouses, greenhouses, landscaping areas, public display areas.
What are the sources of hazards? Hazards may arise from any number of areas.
Hazards can be associated with accident potential, weather or environmental
conditions, health, sanitation, behavior, material or equipment conditions or terrorist
activity. RM does not differentiate among the sources of the hazard. The loss of
personnel, equipment, or collections or damage to the environment due to any
hazard has the same disruptive impact on the Smithsonian mission no matter what
the source. The bottom-line is the effect of the hazard, not its source.
4-8
6.2008
Attachment 1
STEP 1 (cont.)
• What factors should you consider in identifying hazards?
• Disrupters (Change, weather, legal issues)
• Activity
• Time
• Employees or Visitors
• Environmental Health Factors
Disrupters - A new process or piece of equipment introduced into the workplace,
weather conditions such as the flood we experienced in July 2006, equipment failure, or
legal issues such as a visitor who sues because an unsafe environment caused injury.
Activity - some activities involve higher risk and are inherently more dangerous than
others. Some things that make activities more dangerous would include job complexity,
tools or equipment requiring extra skill or training to use, or lack of clear procedural
guidance and training to perform the activity with no misunderstanding.
Time - Was there sufficient time to plan or perform an operation? This could also refer
to the length of time personnel are exposed to a hazard; the greater the length of the
exposure the greater the probability of injury.
Employees or Visitors - What is the condition of the employees or visitors? Are they
healthy? We may have no way of knowing the health status of a visitor, but we can
certainly anticipate and prepare for the unexpected, again, asking what could go wrong.
Are employees new and untrained or experienced and trained? It follows that an
untrained or less experienced employee is more likely to be injured. How many
personnel are exposed to a hazard? If a set of stairs does not have railings that meet
the OSHA requirements and the stair leads to the roof where only one person uses the
stair maybe once or twice a month, there will likely be fewer injuries than if the stairs are
in a public exhibit space used by employees and hundreds of visitors a day. Are there
sufficient trained personnel to safely perform an operation? Lifting heavy objects is less
likely to cause injury if the weight is shared with 2 or more employees.
Environmental Health Conditions - This category includes a variety of health-related
factors to include ergonomics, hearing conservation, radiation and chemical hazards,
etc. Generally, OSHEM approaches these subjects as a team or task force of several
disciplines such as Industrial Hygiene for measuring noise, air flow, exposure to
hazardous substances, etc., a health specialist who can assess health effects of
specific hazards to employees, and safety specialists who insure OSHA standards are
understood and met. All of these categories are covered in greater detail in the
operational Chapters of this Manual.
4-9
6.2008
Attachment 1
The most valuable and necessary tool, or control, to be used in SI facilities is the job
and/or workplace hazard analysis. This tool/technique actually transcends several of
the risk management steps, because you must identify and assess hazards, but is best
considered a control used to manage the hazards that must remain in the workplace for
mission accomplishment.
These are valuable tools for the supervisor and Safety Coordinator to document either
the hazards of performing a particular job (Job Hazard Analysis-JHA) and/or identify
hazards in the workplace (Workplace Hazard Analysis- WHA) for everyone who works
in the location, regardless of their job requirements. The WHA would also take into
account visitors or delivery personnel.
4-10
6.2008
Attachment 1
Generally, you need to do a JHA for the more complex jobs with several steps that
require written instructions and have several hazards associated with the job. All
employees performing these jobs would be covered by the JHA.
A WHA is appropriate for offices or public spaces and locations that have general
hazards rather than job performance hazards.
It is entirely possible that a work location, such as large woodworking or machine shop,
would require both a JHA and a WHA because there may be hazards within the
workplace that are not necessarily associated with a particular job, such as dust
accumulation, hazardous chemical storage, fire prevention concerns, ancillary
employees who deliver wood or stock, etc.
4-11
6.2008
Attachment 1
4-12
6.2008
Attachment 1
The risk of a hazard actually causing environmental damage or injury severe enough for
someone to miss a day of work or cause a museum or research center to close or stop
a vital operation is a function of the severity of the hazard and the likelihood the incident
will occur. In almost all cases, applicable codes and regulations were written because
groups or specific types of injuries occurred with such frequency that a code or
regulation was required to prevent future injuries or property damage. It follows that
code violations are indicators that increase the probability an injury will occur.
Risk Assessment Codes (RAC)
• Almost all deficiencies are hazards that pose a risk of injury, property damage or
mission or environmental impairment.
• Hazards are assessed and risk is assigned in terms of probability and severity of
adverse impact of an event/occurrence.
• This step considers the risk or likelihood of an event or incident adversely
impacting mission, capabilities, people, environment, equipment or property.
• “What are the odds (probability) of something going wrong and what is the effect
(severity) of the incident if it does occur?”
4-13
6.2008
Attachment 1
Tables 4-2 and 4-3 define the levels of severity and probability while Tables 4-4 and
4-5 defines the level of risk in the matrix combining severity and probability.
Severity
Catastrophic Worst case scenario, exposure to this hazard will cause one or
more deaths, permanent total disability or hospitalization of 3 or
more personnel, destroy a major facility or process, a toxic or
dangerous chemical release causing irreparable environmental
damage or death, or force a curtailment of a major institutional
mission for more than 3 months.
Severe Worst case scenario, exposure to this hazard will cause a
permanent partial disability or serious injury causing more than 3
months of lost work days; a chemical release causing irreparable
illness or long term damage to the environment, impair an
important process or major institutional mission for more than 3
days and less than 3 months.
Marginal Worst case scenario, exposure to this hazard will cause days away
from work or restricted work activity other than the day of injury; a
reparable but reportable chemical release or it will impair an
important process or major institutional mission for 1 to 3 days.
Negligible Worst case scenario, exposure to this hazard may require medical
treatment but will result in no lost time other than the day of injury,
or there is little or no property or environmental damage or the
hazard may not cause injury but is a minor violation of consensus
standards.
Table 4-2
Probability
How Often/How long Description
Frequent The exposure is daily Every day many personnel or major missions or
for short periods or facilities are exposed to the hazard often or for
weekly for long periods long periods of time and chance of injury or
of time. mission impairment is high. Or the history of
injuries indicates that this hazard causes injury
often.
Likely Exposure is weekly for Occurs several times, a common occurrence.
short periods or less Examples include periodic use of a hazardous
often but for longer substance or operation, egress blocked or
periods of time restricted several times a week, etc.
Occasional Exposure is sporadic Occurs sometimes, but not a common
occurrence.
Seldom Remotely possible, An example might be exposure to confined space
could occur at some entry hazards.
time.
4-14
6.2008
Attachment 1
4-15
6.2008
Attachment 1
After assessing each hazard, supervisors develop one or more controls that either
eliminate the hazard or reduce the risk (probability and/or severity) of a hazardous
incident occurring. In developing controls, supervisors must consider the reason for the
hazard, not just the hazard itself. The decision must be made at this point as to whether
the hazard can be eliminated or must remain in the workplace in order to accomplish
the mission. If they must remain, then in most cases there are consensus standards
that require controls or countermeasures be put in place to insure employee and
environmental safety. The hazard is reassessed to determine a residual risk once
controls are in place. Risk decisions are always based on the residual risk. The process
of developing and applying controls and reassessing risk continues, and may require
assistance from OSHEM personnel, until an acceptable level of risk is achieved or until
all risks are reduced to a level where benefits outweigh the potential cost. That is the
point to which a decision can be made to take the risk or not.
Controls can take many forms, but normally fall into one of three basic categories:
• Elimination/Avoidance Controls. This is your best option if it is possible. These
controls include positive action to prevent contact with an identified hazard or the
total elimination of the hazard. For example, substitute a non-hazardous
chemical for a hazardous one.
• Engineering/Physical Controls. These take the form of barriers and guards, PPE,
or signs to warn or protect individuals, units, or organizations of existing hazards.
Other examples include ventilation hoods, sound-proofing or attenuation,
improving lighting, ergonomic chairs and computer stations, etc.
• Educational (awareness) Controls. These controls are based on the knowledge
and skills of units, organizations, or individuals. It includes their awareness of the
hazard and control. Effective educational control is implemented through
individual and collective training.
To be effective, each control developed must meet the following criteria:
• Suitability. It must remove the hazard or mitigate (reduce) the residual risk to an
acceptable level.
• Feasibility. The organization must have the capability to implement the control.
• Acceptability. The benefit gained by implementing the control must justify the
cost in resources and time. The assessment of acceptability is largely subjective.
Sources such as personal experience, lessons learned from previous accidents or from
similar past operations can provide or identify possible control measures for specific
events or operations. The key to effective control measures is that they reduce the
effect of or eliminate the identified hazard. Effective control measures must specify
who, what, where, when, and how.
4-16
6.2008
Attachment 1
Arguably, this is the most important step, where “rubber meets the road”. Many are
good at coming up with ideas, controls and solutions, but when it comes to
implementing those controls, often there is a budgetary or personnel void or finger
pointing that it is someone else’s job. Once controls have been agreed upon, personnel
should be assigned to put the controls in place and supervisors must resource the
controls with budgeting, personnel and time. Sometimes the controls require work
tickets to accomplish, in which case make certain someone is assigned the
responsibility to follow up and track the work ticket to completion. If the hazard is RAC
1 or 2 then the Safety Coordinator should ensure implementation of interim controls to
secure the safety of employees or visitors until a permanent solution can be put in
place. For example, a piece of equipment may need to be locked out, or an outlet
marked as out of order until a qualified electrician can bring the equipment or outlet into
compliance.
The exceptional value of this step in the process is the ability to continuously improve
for a safer and safer environment. This step assigns responsibility and accountability to
managers, supervisors, Safety Coordinators, safety committee members and OSHEM
personnel to continuously evaluate the 5-step process for effectiveness in lowering
injury rates. We continue with what works and eliminate controls that do not work. If an
injury occurs, we gather lessons learned and incorporate new countermeasures into our
plan. If elements or components in the work environment or operations change, then
this step must evaluate elevated risk and continue the 5-step process to accommodate
the changes.
An important part of this step is the MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE
Change is always with us and will always raise the level of risk in any environment or
operation where change occurs.
Each facility and organization director must institute a planned approach to identifying
and addressing changes that impact operations and the Safety Program. These
changes can include:
• New or modified equipment
• New or changed operating conditions
• Facility renovations or remodeling
• Relocation to a new facility
• Introduction of a new chemical
• New or re-assigned employees
• New or changed regulations or SI standards
• Emergencies such as weather-related floods, winds, extreme temperatures, or
terrorist related activities
4-17
6.2008
Attachment 1
These changes can introduce new or increase existing heath and safety hazards and
environmental impacts. Changes can be both expected (planned) or encountered
(unplanned). The change management process should address both types of changes
in a way that ensures the Safety Program is current.
Change management can be either 'reactive', in which case management is responding
to external changes, or proactive, in which case management is initiating the change in
order to achieve a desired goal, evaluates the elevated risk, identifies extra hazards and
develops a plan to reduce the risks prior to the change. With a reactive process, the
Safety Program is modified once the change has occurred. This process is typically
utilized for unplanned events, but still requires a system to be in place to identify the
changes that have occurred. A proactive process is more effective by identifying the
changes before they occur and with time to react and plan for the change.
Change management can be conducted on a continuous basis, on a regular schedule
(such as an annual review), or when deemed necessary on a program-by-program
basis or within work environments anticipating changes. Staff members that have been
assigned the responsibility of maintaining the Safety Program (Safety Coordinators,
safety committee members, supervisors) should ensure that they participate in or are
kept abreast of all organizational activities that are likely to result in operational changes
and those unplanned events that can cause operational changes. Complex changes
may require the use of a systematic process of analysis such as adjusting the Job
Hazard Analysis (JHA) to adapt to the change(s). Most of the tools and techniques
listed in this Chapter, to include the JHA/WHA, Risk Management Worksheet (App. A),
Log of Deficiencies/Corrective Action Plan, can be used to anticipate and plan for
environmental or operational changes.
4-18
6.2008
Attachment 2
NEW PROCEDURE OR
PROCEDURAL STEP HAZARD PROTECTION
1. Shut off grinder,
lockout and tag-out None Follow unit's LO/TO Program
Contact with cutting knives, Wear cotton gloves and
2. Open clean-out door airborne plastic dust particulate and dust mask
3. Open cutting chamber
and take clamp off Door is heavy,
blower pipe overexertion Use caution, 2 person job
4. Remove screen Heavy, could fall and Should be removed by 2
chamber cause damage persons
5. Remove screen Contact with cutting knives Wear cotton gloves
Wear cotton gloves and
6. Clean all parts Cutting knives, plastic dust particulate dust mask
7. Clean cyclone and Falling parts and plastic Use cage attached to forks of
filter dust forklift, use particulate mask
8. Install screen and Cutting knives, cradle is Wear cotton gloves, install
cradle heavy cradle by 2 persons
9. Install chamber and Could fall and cause Should be installed by 2
clamp on blower pipe. damage persons
10. Install clean out door
and clean floor area Cutting knives Wear cotton gloves
4-19
6.2008
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ATTACHMENT 3
JOB TITLE: Created: Revise Date: JHA Creator: Title:
6.2008
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS
WORK LOCATION (ROOM NO.): DEPARTMENT: TOOL/MACHINE MAKE AND MODEL:
Define Activities/Equipment Used (note
Task(s) frequency/duration) POTENTIAL HAZARDS REQUIRED CONTROLS/WORK PRACTICES REQUIRED PPE
4-20
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ATTACHMENT 4
JOB TITLE: Created: Revise Date: JHA Creator: Title:
6.2008
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS OxyAcetylene Welder 5/15/2007 Beverly Maki OSHEM Saf Spec
WORK LOCATION (ROOM NO.): DEPARTMENT: TOOL/MACHINE MAKE AND MODEL:
Welding Operations
Most welding shops Oxy-Acetylene welding machine, model xxx
Define Activities/Equipment Used (note
Task(s) frequency/duration) POTENTIAL HAZARDS REQUIRED CONTROLS/WORK PRACTICES REQUIRED PPE
Oxy-Acetylene welding, used on average X
times a day, X days a week by X # of welders.
Spilling water could cause slip/trip. Not cleaning Slowly apply small amount of water to cloth and wipe
1. Turn torch 1a. Wipe down work area with damp cloth area could leave dust particles/combustibles that down work area. Ensure fire extinguishers are available N/A
(water)
on could flare and charged.
Ensure uncoiled hoses will not be a tripping hazard.
1b. Uncoil and straighten hoses from Loose hose on floor could cause slip/trip. Ensure there are no kinks, cracks or damage to hoses. N/A
cylinders. Damaged hose could cause leak/fire Ensure all torch valves are closed and inspect for
possible leaks.
1c. Adjust screws on regulators so they are
Gas leak could cause fire Ensure adjustment screws on regulators are backed off N/A
backed off.
so no tension is present for both acetylene and oxygen.
1d. Open cyclinder valve slowly by turning
None None N/A
counterclockwise.
1e. Turn adjustment screw clockwise to
None Know the correct pressure for type equipment
desired pressure
Safety glasses, work
1f. Crack open acetylene valve on torch body. Potential gas accumulation if not prepared to light Have striker available
gloves
Quickly, so not to let gas accumulate, hold torch facing
Potential gas accumulation away from face, body and portable unit. Using other Safety glasses, work
1g. Use striker to ignite torch
Spark production (could ignite other material) hand, strike flint approximately 2 inches from tip of gloves
torch.
Incorrect adjustment could cause flame out, Safety glasses, work
1h. Adjust acetylene torch body valve Adjust acetylene torch body valve to desired flame
undesirable magnitude gloves
Incorrect adjustment could cause flame out, Slowly open oxygen valve on torch body to achieve Safety glasses, work
1i. Open axygen valve on torch body
undesirable magnitude desired flame. gloves
Welding training should cover when and how to use
2. Perform 2a. Have flux and welding rods appropriate for Improper weld due to improper selection of flux
different fluxes and welding rods. Adhere to the
type weld and material being welded and welding rods
weld trianing.
4-21
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ATTACHMENT 4
Define Activities/Equipment Used (note
6.2008
Task(s) frequency/duration) POTENTIAL HAZARDS REQUIRED CONTROLS/WORK PRACTICES REQUIRED PPE
1. Updated (annual) Welding shop burn permit
required.
2. If welding outside shop, Burn Permit from
Authorized Person required.
3. Do not weld near flammable material. Move
2b. Perform weld 2b1. Fire or Explosion
flammables at least 35 feet away or protect them with
flame-proof covers.
4. Do not weld on drums, tanks or any closed
containers unless a qualified person has tested it and
declared it or prepared it to be safe.
1. Use enough forced ventilation or local exhaust
Welder's cap; safety
(forced suction) at the arc to remove fumes from
glasses, oxygen fed
breathing area.
respirator, if required;
2b2. Breathing welding fumes 2. Use portable smoke eater when out on a job.
Welder's face shield;
3. Use welding helmet that has fresh air supply.
welder's gloves; welder's
4. Keep your head out of the fumes and do not breathe
apron
fumes.
1. Wear welder's cap, eye protection, face shield,
Welder's cap, eye
gloves, apron
2b3. Sparks could burn eyes, hands, clothes protection, face shield,
2. If welding outside with breeze, use wind break and
gloves, apron
line of sight barrier to protect passers-by.
1. Use welding helmet with correct shade of filter. Welder's cap, eye
3c. Perform weld with arc welder 2b4. Arc rays can burn eyes 2. Use welding curtain to shield other employees and protection, face shield,
visitors from arc rays. gloves, apron
Follow procedures/protocols listed in Chapter XX, Fire Welder's cap, eye
2b5. Smoke may set off smoke alarm or sprinkler
Protection Impairment Permit whenever working closer protection, face shield,
system
than 35 feet from a sprinkler head or smoke detector. gloves, apron
Drain piping at welding area, wearing insulated gloves, Welder's cap, eye
2c. Weld heating, AC, water, steam,
2c1.. Contents of piping could cause burns eye protection or whatever other PPE based on pipe protection, face shield,
condensate return lines.
contents. gloves, apron
Welder's cap, eye
2d. Perform weld on or near electrical devices 2d1. Electical shock, cuts and burns Use lock-oout/tag-out procedures. protection, face shield,
gloves, apron
Position fingers on acetylene valve ensuring they do Welder's cap, eye
3. Turn off 3a. Close acetylene valve on torch body Valve and stem (pinch points) not come in contact with the valve stem. Turn valve protection, face shield,
torch clockwise. gloves, apron
4-22
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ATTACHMENT 4
Define Activities/Equipment Used (note
6.2008
Task(s) frequency/duration) POTENTIAL HAZARDS REQUIRED CONTROLS/WORK PRACTICES REQUIRED PPE
Position fingers on oxygen valve ensuring they do not Welder's cap, eye
3b. Close oxygen valve on torch body Valve and stem (pinch points) come in contact with the valve stem. Turn valve protection, face shield,
clockwise. gloves, apron
Position fingers on acetylene valve ensuring they do Welder's cap, eye
3c. Turn the acetylene valve clockwise Valve and stem (pinch points) not come in contact with the valve stem. Turn valve protection, face shield,
clockwise. gloves, apron
Position fingers on acetylene valve ensuring they do Welder's cap, eye
3d. Turn the oxygen valve clockwise Valve and stem (pinch points) not come in contact with the valve stem. Turn valve protection, face shield,
clockwise. gloves, apron
3e. Close adjustment screws on acetylene
None N/A None
regulator
3f. Close adjustment screws on oxygen
None N/A None
regulator
3g. Slowly open Acetylene valve on the torch Position torch nozzle away from personnel and any
Gas (potential inhalation, explosion) None
body to bleed lines. heat source. Open valve on torch body.
3h. Slowly open oxygen valve on the torch Position torch nozzle away from personnel and any
Gas (potential explosion) None
body to bleed lines. heat source. Open valve on torch body.
Position fingers on acetylene valve ensuring they do
3i. Close acetylen valve on torch body Valve and stem (pinch points) not come in contact with the valve stem. Turn valve None
clockwise.
Position fingers on acetylene valve ensuring they do
3j. Close oxygen valve on torch body Valve and stem (pinch points) not come in contact with the valve stem. Turn valve None
clockwise.
4-23
Operational Risk Management Worksheet ATTACHMENT 5
Operation: Plan Exhibit of very large
6.2008
and heavy collections Date of Operation: 7/10/2006 Worksheet developed by: Safety Coordinator's name
Operation Description: An exhibit is scheduled that includes canvases that are 12' x 18' and other large sizes coated in massive amount of lead so they weigh
hundreds of pounds, and one sculptural piece that weighs 10,000 lb.
Step 2 Step 4 Step 5
Step 1 Assess Step 3 Residual How/Who to Supervise/
Identify Hazard Hazard Develop Controls Risk Implement Evaluate
Lifting heavy objects causes Back injury prevention training; Purchase, rent or borrow WHE. Director or designate/SC note if
back injury or other body sufficient weight handling equipment; Contract movers; SC arranges for effective, other possible
trauma RAC 2 sufficient personnel to share load. RAC 3 training; countermeasures
Supervisors ensure personnel have
Dropped heavy objects could Safety Shoes; safety awareness and wear safety shoes; use
cause foot injury RAC 3 training RAC 4 contracted workers SC/supervisor enforce PPE
Sharp objects or wood Supervisors ensure personnel have
splinters on crates could Leather gloves to prevent splinters, and wear gloves; use contracted
cause hand injury RAC 3 cuts RAC 4 workers SC/supervisor enforce PPE
In planning stage determine weight/ Director determines limitations and
lift/space requirements. Limit exhibit to resource capabilities and assigns Director or designate/SC note if
Weight exceeds forklift meet present capacities, or contract personnel capable of determining effective, other possible
capacity RAC 2 for necessary equipment RAC 4 weight and size restrictions. countermeasures
Weight exceeds elevator In planning stage determine weight/
capacity RAC 2 lift/space requirements (see 8 above) RAC 4 Same as 8 above Same as 8 above
Pieces are too large to fit in In planning stage determine weight/
the elevator RAC 2 lift/space requirements (see 8 above) RAC 4 Same as 8 above Same as 8 above
In planning stage determine weight/
Mounting challenges to lift/space/mounting requirements;
prevent pieces from falling check with previous museum showing Employees are trained and provided Supervisor/SC insures safe
from wall RAC 1 exhibit for lessons learned RAC 3 necessary equipment to install safely installation operations
Unbalanced pieces could
topple RAC 1 Same as 11 above RAC 3 Same as 11 above Same as 11 above
Thorough planning and involvement of
Insufficient space for full OSHEM fire and safety personnel to
exhibit and visitor viewing insure sufficient space for exhibit, Exhibit planners use scale drawings Supervisor/SC insures safe
space RAC 2 employees and visitors RAC 4 and coordinate with OSHEM installation operations
Sharp protrusions could
injure visitors RAC 2 Same as 13 above RAC 4 Same as 13 above Same as 13 above
Coordinate with qualified OSHEM Once provided factual exposure
personnel to evaluate exposure hazard assessments, Director
Exposure to lead dust RAC 2 hazard. RAC 4 determines exhibit limitations. Same as 13 above
Highest residual risk level: LOW MEDIUM HIGH EXTREMELY HIGH Accepted by: Date:
4-24
Attachment 6
Job Observation / Task Analysis
Recommendations
Reviewed by (Name/Title):
Job Observation Form OSHEM JO 001 Creation Date: 30 August 2007
Revision # _____ and Date: ______________
6.2008
4-25