0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views14 pages

SPICE Simulation of Active Filters

Analog Circuits Homework

Uploaded by

parag.ramteke
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views14 pages

SPICE Simulation of Active Filters

Analog Circuits Homework

Uploaded by

parag.ramteke
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Analog Electronic Circuits Capstone Project

SPICE Simulation

1. Group/Team number: 3

2. Group members:
a. Member 1 name: Natarajan Subramanyam Mahesh
b. Member 2 name: Kumaran Chandran
c. Member 3 name: Anvesh Chatla
d. Member 4 name: Aviraj Mohan Bawake
e. Member 5 name: Vijayanand

3. Problem description:
Simulation of the following active 1st order filters using SPICE
1. LPF with fL (3dB) =1.59KHz
2. HPF with fH (3dB) =1.59KHz
3. BPF with fL (3dB) =1.59KHz and fH (3dB) =80KHz
4. BRF (Notch Filter) with fL (3dB) =1.59KHz and fH (3dB) =50KHz

4. Methodology: The above filters have been simulated using LTspiceXVII® as the
simulation software tool. OPAMP TL062® has been used for simulating the filters. All the
simulations have been done using non ideal components. The opamp TL062 is not
available in the LTSPICE library. Hence the spice model had to be downloaded, and a
symbol created for the same in LTSPICE.

All the filter design simulations have the following illustrated

• Filter Transfer function (Magnitude)


• Time domain responses
o Pass band
o Rejection band
• Filter transfer function with a component varied to get an optimum response
• The 3dB BW marked using the 2 available cursors in LTSPICE.

Conclusions: The following points can be observed in all the filter simulations

1. The response of the filters is within 1% of the expected results.


2. In a first order filter the tuning of the filter to the exact desired response with real
commercially available components exhibit variations due to the tolerances of the
components chosen.
Active LPF Filter Design:

Input: LPF with fL (3dB) =1.59KHz

The filter cut off frequency for the above LPF can be computed based on the equation as shown
below

𝑭𝑳 = 𝟏/(𝟐 ∗ 𝒑𝒊 ∗ 𝑹𝟏 ∗ 𝑪𝟏 )

Filter Component Calculations

LPF cutoff
R 1.20E+03
FreqLPF 1.5900E+03
Ccomputed 8.3415E-08

Filter Schematic:
Results and Discussion:

Figure 1 Time Domain Response LPF Passband

Figure 2 LPF Roll Off

Figure 3 LPF Response in the filter cut off region


Active HPF Filter Design:

Input: HPF with fH (3dB) =1.59KHz

The filter cut off frequency for the above HPF can be computed based on the equation as shown
below

𝑭𝑯 = 𝟏/(𝟐 ∗ 𝒑𝒊 ∗ 𝑹𝟐 ∗ 𝑪𝟐 )

Filter component Calculations

HPF cutoff
R 1.20E+03
FreqLPF 1.5900E+03
Ccomputed 8.3415E-08

Filter Schematic:

Results and Dicussions :

Figure 4 HPF Frequency Response


Active BPF Filter Design:

LPF with fL (3dB) =1.59KHz

HPF with fH (3dB) =80KHz

Expected fo (KHz)=√𝒇𝑳 ∗ 𝒇𝑯 =11.3KHz

Bandpass Filter Computations


HPF Cut off LPF cutoff
R 1.20E+03 R 1.20E+03
FreqHPF 8.00E+04 FreqLPF 1.5900E+03
Ccomputed 1.65786E-09 Ccomputed 8.3415E-08
Filter Schematic:

Results and Dicussions :


Active BRF (band Reject Filter) Filter Design:

LPF with fL (3dB) =2.5KHz

HPF with fH (3dB) =50KHz

Expected fo (KHz)=√𝒇𝑳 ∗ 𝒇𝑯 = 11.18KHz

Notch Filter (Computations)


HPF Cut off LPF cutoff
R 2.00E+03 R 2.00E+03
C 1.40E-08 C 1.50E-08
FreqHPF 5.6841E+03 FreqLPF 5.3052E+03
FreqHPF 5.00E+04 FreqLPF 2.5000E+03
1.59155E-
Ccomputed 09 Ccomputed 3.1831E-08
Fnotch 1.1180E+04
fbw 3.79E+02

Filter Schematic :

Results and Discussions


Figure 5 Frequency Response Band Reject/Notch Filter
Figure 6 Band Reject Filter Response in the pass band
Figure 7 Band Reject Filter Response in the notch

You might also like