S. No.-34.
Chainage Span Arrangement
Struct
Side As per Remarks Reply
From To ure As per Site
Schedules
The structure is a 3-
span continuous
design with a total of
27 spans. However,
the schedules (M=1290)
2 x 45.00 +
138+ 139+ Major mentioned only 26
BHS 24 x 50.00 27 x 47.80=1290.6
050 340 bridge spans. The 27 Spans available on site.
=1290
superstructure type is Span= 27x47.778=1290.006m
a PSC box girder, but
the schedules
mentioned shows it as
PSC girders instead.
(M=74)
1 x 3.35 + 1 x 22.80 + The site has 5 spans, 5 Spans available at site
2 x 26.50 +
214+ 241+ Major 1 x 20.95 + but in the schedules, it 1x3.35+1x23.15+1x21+1x23.1
LHS 1x
411 485 bridge 1 x 23.00 + 1 x is mentioned only 3 5+1x3.35=74m
20.50=73.5
3.20=73.3 spans. (span length is not matching
with GE)
At the site, there are 5
spans, but the
schedules mentioned (M=122)
only 3 spans. The 5 Spans available at site
2 x 45.00 +
241+ 241+ Major 2 x 13.50 + 2 x 31.60 superstructure type is 1x13+1x31.6+1x32.8+1x31.6+
LHS 1x
870 982 bridge + 1 x 32.80= 123m a balanced cantilever, 1x13=74m
32.00=122
whereas in the (span length is not matching
schedules it is with GE)
mentioned as an RCC
girder.
S. No.-35.
Span Arrangement (m) Reply
Chainage Structure Side
As per CA As per Site
(M=99)
3 x 33.140 2 x 27.00 + 1 x 45.40
142+150 Flyover BHS 1x27+1x45+1x27
=99.42 =99.4
Chain Struct Carriage Struc Span Rem
age ure way ture Arrangemen arks
Type t (m)
184+3 MNB MCW RCC 1 x 8.80 Addi
30 +SR BOX (skew) tiona
l
foun
d
203+4 MNB MCW RCC 1 x 8.00 Addi
50 +SR BOX tiona
l
foun
d