DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

DESIGN OF BEAM-COLU

Presented to by GYANENDRA MOHAN DAS

Version II 15-0
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

DESIGN OF BEAM-COLU

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Columns in practice rarely experience concentric axial compression alone. Since columns
are usually parts of a frame, they experience both bending moment and axial force. The
frames in which columns are members, may be classified as braced or unbraced. In
braced frames the resistance to lateral loads at floor levels is provided either by bracings
[Fig. 1(b)] or shear walls. In case of unbraced frames [Fig. 1(d)] the resistance to lateral
loads is obtained from the members of the frames with moment resisting connections
between them. Thus the relative translation between the ends of a column in a braced
frame is prevented, whereas in unbraced frames the columns are free to sway causing
relative translation between their ends. More details on classification of frames as braced
and unbraced are given in the chapter on frames. Thus columns in practice experience
bending about one or both axis in addition to axial compression, due to one or more of the
following reasons.

• The compressive force may be eccentrically transferred to the column [Fig. 1(a)].
When this eccentric force is transferred to the centre line of the column, an equivalent
axial compression and bending moment act on the column.

• When the beams in braced rigid portal frames are subjected to gravity loads, the
rotation of the beams at their junction with the column causes rotation of the column
also at the junction due to rigid connection [Fig. 1(b)]. Hence beam transfers bending
moments to the column in addition to axial load [Fig. 1(c)].

• When a multi-storey multi-bay un-braced frame is subjected to gravity loads and

lateral loads due to wind or earthquake, the columns are subjected to sway deflection
and bending [Fig 1(d)]. In such cases, the columns experience axial compression as
well as bending moments [Fig.1 (e)].

• Beams may frame from two orthogonal directions in corner columns in buildings [Fig.
1(f)]. In such cases the columns may be subjected to bending about both principal
axes in addition to axial compression [Fig. 1(f)].

Columns subjected to combined axial force and bending moment are referred to as
beamcolumns. A beam-column may be subjected to single curvature bending over its
length [Fig. 1(c)]. In this case the nature of the bending stress (compressive or tensile) at

Version II 15-1
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

a point in the cross section and sign of the bending moment diagram over its entire length
of the beam-column remains the same. Consequently, the curvature has the same sign
over the entire length of the column. On the other hand, the columns in a sway frame
[Fig. 1(d)]

© Copyright reserved
experience reverse curvature bending as shown in Fig. 1(e), causing variation of the
nature (positive or negative) of the bending moment and curvature over the length of the
column.

(a) (b)
(c)

(d)

z
y
x

Version II 15-2
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

(f)

Fig. 1 Beam-Columns in Frames

Presence of bending moments in the beam-columns reduces the axial force at which they
fail. This topic presented in two parts, deals with the behaviour, and design of
beamcolumns. In Part I initially, the behaviour and strength of short beam-column
members under combined compression and bending moment are discussed. In such short
beam column the failure is due to the strength of the material being reached (material
failure). Subsequently, the behaviour and strength of practical, long beam-columns, as
affected by stability and deformation, are discussed. In long columns the failure may be
either due to material strength being reached at the ends of the column or instability of the
overall column. In Part II equations for the design of beam-columns subjected to
combination of axial compression and biaxial bending are presented. A design example of
a beamcolumn also is presented in Part II.

2.0 SHORT BEAM-COLUMNS

A short member (stub column), made of non-slender (plastic, compact or semi-compact)

section under axial compression, fails by yielding (due to large deformation) at the squash
load, Pcs, given by [Fig. 2(a)]

Pcs = Ag fy (1)

where, fy is the yield strength of the material, and Ag is the gross area of the cross section.

If the stub column is made of slender cross section, the plate elements of the cross section
undergo local buckling before reaching the yield stress. This causes reduction in the
effective area of the cross section to a value below the gross area, A g, and the member
fails at a load below Pcs, given by Eqn.1.

Similarly a short member made of plastic or compact section and subjected to only
bending moment fails at the plastic moment capacity, Mp, given by [Fig. 2(b)]

Mp = z f y (2)

Version II 15-3
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

where, z = plastic section modulus of the cross section, in the case of plastic and compact
sections.
fy fy fy fy
P
= +
M
fy fy fy fy fy

Section (a) Only axial (b) Only bending (c) Combined compression
compression moment and bending moment

Fig. 2 Stresses in Short Beam-Columns

A semi-compact section subjected to bending moment only fails by buckling of a plate
element of the cross section before the plastification of the entire section as shown in Fig.
2 (b) but after the stress at the extreme fibre in compression reaches the yield stress. In a
slender section, the plate elements buckle even before the extreme fibre stress in bending
reaches the yield stress. Consequently, the semi-compact and slender sections fail under
bending even before reaching the plastic moment, Mp, given by Eqn. 2.

The discussions that follow generally assume that the cross section is either plastic or
compact. In the case of slender and semi-compact sections the effect of earlier failure
before complete section yielding has to be considered. The strength of such members
may be analysed by following the procedure discussed in the chapters on cold-formed
steel members.

The stress distribution at failure over the (plastic or compact) cross-section of a

beamcolumn under combined compression and bending moment is shown in Fig. 1(c). It
can be modeled as superposition of only compressive stress over an area of the cross
section close to the neutral axis of the cross section and the balance of the section
subjected to compressive and tensile stress due to bending. Hence such beam-columns
fail before reaching the squash load, P cs, given by equation 1 or the plastic moment, M p,
given by Eqn. 2. The typical failure envelope diagram of a stub beam-column made of I
section and subjected to axial compression Fc and bending moment M is shown in Fig. 3,
in a non-dimensional form. At smaller values of axial compression, only a small area of
the cross section closer to the neutral axis is necessary to equilibrate the external
compression, Fc. Since the area closer to the neutral axis contributes very little to the
plastic moment capacity, Mp, of the cross section, the reduction in the moment capacity,
M, is negligible when the axial compression is small. It is seen in the failure envelope
that for smaller axial compression (Fc / Pcs < 0.15) the reduction in the moment capacity is
negligible (M/Mp  1.0)

Version II 15-4
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

1.0 Stub column

loading curve
Fc/Pcs
Failure envelope
A
F0/Pcs
B
Long columns
Fcl /Pcs
loading curve
Fcl 
Eqn. 3
Mp

O Mo/Mp Mmax/Mp 1.0 M/Mp

Fig. 3 Beam-Column Failure Envelope

Eqn. 3 in a non-dimensional form gives the failure envelope under the major axis bending
and the axial compression, as shown in Fig. 3.

PFcsc 0.M85pM 1.0

 

M
1.0 3
Mp

Although there is a small reduction in the bending moment at lower values of axial
compression as seen in Fig. 3, in Eqn. 3 this has been disregarded. The interaction
equation (Eqn. 3) is linear up to the plastic moment capacity, Mp, of the member.

The loading curve of a short beam-column by a compressive force at a constant

eccentricity, is indicated by a straight line, such as OA (Fig. 3) having a constant slope.
The slope is dictated by the eccentricity. When this loading path OA intersects the failure
envelope curve at A, the beam-column strength is reached. The values of Fcs and M
corresponding to point A are the compression and moment capacity of short the
beamcolumn under the given eccentricity. This may be calculated from Eqn. 3 by
substituting Fc e for M, where e is the eccentricity of the compressive force, Fc.

3.0 LONG BEAM-COLUMNS

Version II 15-5
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

Typically steel columns in practice are long and slender. Such slender columns when
axially compressed tend to fail by buckling rather than yielding, as discussed in the
chapter on Introduction to Column Buckling. Similarly, slender I sections subjected to
bending moment about the major axis (x axis) when not laterally supported, may fail by
lateral-torsional buckling, as discussed earlier in the chapter on Unrestrained Beam
Design. However, under minor axis (y axis) bending, the plastic and compact sections will
reach the plastic moment capacity, Mpy, without undergoing premature lateral buckling or
local buckling. Such long slender members subjected to combined axial compression and
bending may experience different modes of instability or material failure. These are
discussed in this section.

Consider a slender beam-column subjected only to equal and opposite end moment, Mo, as
shown in Fig. 4(a). The beam-column is bent into a single curvature with a maximum
deflection 0, as shown by the dotted line in Fig. 4(a). If the axial compression is applied
at the ends of the column now, additional bending moment is caused due to the axial load
acting on the deformed shape. This additional bending moment causes additional
deflection and so on, until the final maximum deflection  is reached at the stage of
equilibrium under combined axial force and bending moments. This is referred to as P-
effects. The final deflected shape and the final bending moment diagram, considering the
P- effect, are shown by dashed curves in Fig. 4(a). It is seen that due to P- effect, the
maximum moment in the beam-column, Mmax, is larger than the externally applied end
moments, Mo.

The same beam-column, when subjected to equal end moments acting in the same
direction, experiences double curvature bending in addition to axial compression as
shown in Fig. 4(b). The deflected shape as well as the bending moment diagram of the
beam column, not considering P- effects, are shown in Fig. 4(b) by dotted curves and
after considering the P- effects is indicated by the dashed curve. It is seen that although
 is greater than o, in this case, the magnified moment considering the P- effects need
not be greater than the end moments Mo. Thus, it is seen that the P- effects and the
magnified moments depend upon the moment gradient over the length of the member. The
discussion so far was about beam-columns in frames braced against sway.

Version II 15-6
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

Fig. 4 Deflection and Moment Magnification

If a frame is not braced to prevent lateral sway, linear elastic analysis for lateral loads may
indicate that column ends translate relative to one another by a distance 0, in addition to
end rotations and reverse curvature deformation as indicated by dotted curve in Fig. 4(c).
The axial forces, P, acting on the frame with sway displacement, 0, increase the sway to
, as shown by dashed curve and the column and beam moments also increase. This
additional displacement can be obtained only by a non-linear analysis of the frame
considering the equilibrium of the frame in the deformed configuration. This increase in
sway deformation and bending moments, due to the load acting on the deformed structure,
are referred to as P- effects.

Let us see the load-deformation behaviour of a beam-column, when the axial compression
and end moments are applied one after another. If an axial compression, P, is initially
applied so that P/Pcr is maintained constant while the moments at the two ends of the
beam-column are proportionately increased in the elastic range of the material, the
moment-end rotation diagram is linear as shown by Fig. 5(a). However, it is seen that the
stiffness of the beam-column (the slope of the moment-rotation line) decreases with
increase in the initially applied axial compression. When the P/Pcr = 1.0, the end rotation,
 [Fig. 4(a)] increases to infinity even for M=0, indicating instability under axial
compression itself.

Version II 15-7
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

On the other hand, if the ratio of the initially applied end moments, M0/Mp, is maintained
constant and the axial compression alone is increased, the compressive load versus lateral
deformation behaviour of the beam-column in the elastic range is as per Fig. 5(b). In this
case the load deformation behaviour is non-linear. It is seen that a perfect column
subjected to axial compression without any end moments undergoes bifurcation type of
buckling [OAB in Fig.5 (b)]. If some end moments are applied initially, the member
undergoes initial deflection, o, the magnitude of which depends upon the magnitude of
the end moments. Subsequently, as the axial compression is increased gradually, the
lateral deflection increases even from the very beginning. Initially such an increase is
seen to be at a slower rate, but nearer to the critical load it increases rapidly before failure
occurs [Fig.5 (b)]. Usually the failure is triggered by yielding under the combined effect
of axial compression and maximum moment. It is seen that the end moments modify the
behaviour of an axially loaded column in a
imperfections. way, similar to the initial bow type of

P/Pcr
M0 0.0

0.5

0.8
1.0


(a) At constant axial load, P

A M0/MP= 0.0
1.0 B
P. 0.1
Pcr 0.5

0.8


(b) At constant end moments, M0
Fig. 5 Elastic Behaviour of Beam-Columns

Version II 15-8
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

Conventional first order linear elastic analyses of frames do not reflect these additional
bending moments in beam-columns due to P- and P- effects, since the equilibrium
equations in these analyses methods are derived for the un-deformed structure. In the
linear elastic analysis of a frame, the axial force and bending moments in a beam-column
increase linearly, with the increase in the load on frame, as shown by straight line OA in
Fig.3 drawn for short column. However, if we look at the equilibrium of the beamcolumn
in the deformed configuration [Fig.4], (through a non-linear analysis), bending moments
are magnified by P- and P- effects in a nonlinear fashion, as the load increases.

The non-linear variation of the maximum bending moment, M max, due to increase in the
axial load, P, acting at a constant end eccentricity (M0/P = constant end eccentricity) of a
long column is also shown in Fig.3 (curve OB). When this non-linear P versus M loading
curve intersects the failure envelope at B, the long beam-column would fail. It is seen that
if the moment magnification of the long column due to P- and P- effects were not
considered, the compressive strength of the member would be obtained as F0, whereas the
actual compressive strength of the long beam-column is reduced to Fcl, due to the moment
magnification effect. The corresponding linear analysis moment is M o, whereas the actual
magnified moment is Mmax. The additional deflection and bending moment are due to the
axial load acting on the deformed column as given below.

• in a column within a floor (P- effect) [Figs. 4(a) and 4 (b)]

• between the ends of the columns (sway) at adjacent floors (P- effect) [Fig. 4(c)].

The magnified deflection and bending moment can be approximately obtained from the
following equations.
0 (4a)
 

1 P PE 

0 (4b)
 

1 P PE 

C m M0 (4c)
Mmax 

1 P PE 

where Cm is a coefficient that accounts for the moment gradient effects explained in
greater detail later in this chapter. PE is the Euler buckling strength of the column in the
plane of bending. It is seen that as the applied axial load approaches the Euler buckling

Version II 15-9
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

load, both deflection, , and magnified moment, Mmax, increase rapidly and tend to
approach infinity, indicating that even if M0 is very small, as P approaches PE, failure is
imminent.

3.1 Beam-columns at Ultimate Load

An axially loaded I section long column fails by buckling about the slender axis. The
member (beam) bent about the major axis fail by either formation of plastic hinge at
plastic moment Mpx or by lateral buckling at a value of bending moment less than Mpx
depending upon the laterally unsupported length. The member bent about the minor axis
fails by formation of plastic hinge at plastic moment, Mpy

A beam-column becomes axially loaded compression member when the eccentricity of

the applied compression is equal to zero. When the eccentricity of the applied
compression is very large (tending to infinity) the beam column tends to behave like a
beam, since the axial compression effect is negligible. Thus these two cases define the
two limits of a beam-column. In between, a beam-column covers a range of combination
of axial load and bending moment. Due to this, various combinations of buckling and
plastic failures are exhibited by beam-columns, depending upon the relative values of the
axial force, bending moment, buckling strength and bending strength of the member.
Further, the bending may be about the minor axis only, causing flexural yielding type of
failure or about the major axis only, causing torsional flexural buckling, or a combination
of bending moments about both the axes.

Figs. 6 (a) and 6(b) show the strength of typical beam-columns made of I sections,
subjected to axial compression and uniaxial bending about the minor and major axis,
respectively. The solid curves represent the strength envelope of beam-columns in a
frame, considering the different long column and sway effects. The curves PBQ in Figs.
6(a) and 6(b) represent the strength envelopes of a stub column without considering the
P- and P- effects. Therefore, if these short column strength envelopes are used, the
actual bending moments and axial force used in evaluating the strength should be based
on a non-linear analysis accounting for the P- and P- effects. Thus the loading path
from such an analysis would be represented by the dashed curve OB. Similarly, the
strength envelopes PCR account for the P- effects only. Hence, if these strength
envelope curves are used, actual moment and axial force evaluation should be based on an
analysis method that accounts for P- effects. The loading path (P versus M) from such an
analysis is represented by dashed line OC. The strength envelopes PAS account for both
P- and P- effects. Hence a linear analysis is adequate to obtain the axial forces and
moments, while using these strength curves.

After correcting for sway and After correcting for sway

Version II 15-10
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

O My/Mpy 1.0 O Mx/Mpx 1.0

(a) Minor axis bending (b) Major axis bending

bow (P- and P-) and bow (P- and P-)
1.0 Q Q
Short column 1.0
Fc/Pcs R failure envelope Short column
R
Fc/Pc failure envelope
After
Fcl/Pcs S A C B correction s S
Fcl/Pcs A C B After correction
for (P-) for (P-) effect

P* P*  P*
P*

P
P

Fig. 6 Uniaxial Bending of Slender Beam-Columns

It is seen in Figs. 6(a) and 6(b) that the strength under axial compression decreases when
the P- and P- effects are considered. It is also seen that under pure bending, the major
axis bending strength is affected due to the lateral buckling and that pure bending strength
can be less than the plastic moment capacity. Mpx The bending strength, when the axial
compression is zero, is given by Mx, which is less than Mpx. The dashed curves represent
the loading path corresponding to different levels of analysis. The dashed curves OA
represent the linear analysis path and hence their intersections with the strength envelopes
corrected for P- and P- effects (PAS), give the member strengths, Fcl. The dashed
curves OB represent the nonlinear analysis paths, considering P- and P effects and
hence intersections of these curves with the short column strength curve (PBQ) give the
member strengths, Fcl. The dashed curves OC represent the loading paths from nonlinear
analysis considering P- effects only and hence their intersections with the strength
curves (PCR) corrected for P- effect give the member strengths, Fcl.

3.2 Effects of Slenderness Ratio and Axial Force on Modes of Failure

Beam-columns may fail by flexural yielding or torsional flexural buckling. The actual
mode of failure would depend upon the magnitude of the axial load and eccentricity as
well as the slenderness ratio. The sub-ultimate and failure behaviour of beam-columns, as
affected by different parameters, are briefly reviewed in the following sections (Dowling
et al., 1988).

Version II 15-11
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

Mx

Mpx
A
P/Py < 0.25

C’
E P/Py >0.5 B
C
D Short Column
F
F’
Slender Column
F’’

O 

Fig. 7 Beam-column Moment Rotation Behaviour

3.2.1 Low axial load ratio (Fc/Pcs< 0.33)

Beam-columns having lower slenderness ratios ( /r <50): When subjected to moments
about the major axis at both ends of the beam, the moment-curvature relationship at the
sub-ultimate stage may be linear or non-linear depending upon whether the axial force is
applied first followed by bending moment or both of them are increased proportionately
(Figs. 5). The deformation is only in the plane of bending moment. At the penultimate
stage, yielding of the compression flange occurs first, which spreads through the section
on further loading. The ultimate strength is reached, when the plastic hinge is formed at
one or both the ends. Thus the failure is due to the section strength being reached at one
or both the ends. Under proportional loading, the loading path is indicated by the line
OAB in Fig. 7. It is seen that there would be a small reduction in the moment capacity
below Mpx due to the presence of the axial compression in the member. Further, there
would be a reduction in the moment (unloading) beyond point A, with increasing end
rotation, due to the spread of plasticity from the end sections to other sections along the
length.

Beam-columns having a higher slenderness ratio ( /r.>80): A more slender column, under
smaller axial compression combined with end moments as before, would fail by buckling
out-of-the-plane of the bending moment. If bending is predominant, lateral buckling of
compression flange as in unrestrained beams occurs (OAC in Fig. 7). The axial force
could cause minor axis deformation and hence the failure can be by minor axis bending
and twisting (OC'), at moments below the full in plane strength obtained in the case of
short/stocky columns. The moment rotation behaviour at the ultimate stage is indicated

Version II 15-12
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

by dashed line in Fig.7. The failure would be after plastic hinge formation unless the
slenderness ratio is very large.

3.2.2 High axial load ratio (Fc/Pcs > 0.5)

Beam-columns having a lower slenderness ratio ( /r <50): Under high axial load
combined with bending moment, yielding can occur over a larger segment of the member,
due to combined axial stress, bending stress and residual stress. Moment magnification at
the mid-length of the column occurs due to single curvature bending deflection caused by
equal end moments [Fig.4 (a)]. In the case of short/stocky member, the failure is due to
the yield strength being reached at a section over the length of the member under
combined axial force and magnified bending moment. The corresponding curve is shown
by line ODEF in Fig.7. The main differences in the behaviour of stocky beam-column
under larger axial compression, compared to smaller axial compression are the moment
magnification, larger reduction in moment capacity due to larger axial compression and
the drastic unloading in the penultimate stage (EF in Fig. 7).

Beam-columns having a higher slenderness ratio ( /r.>80): In the case of slender

beamcolumns with a larger axial compression, the P- effect is larger both in the plane of
and out of plane of the moment. In longer beam-columns, the moment may drop
drastically when yielding starts under combined axial compression and magnified moment
(OEF'). The weak axis buckling/flexural torsional buckling, causing out-of-plane
deformation, could occur earlier than that corresponding to the section strength under
combined axial force and magnified moment (ODF" in Fig. 7).

Thus design of beam-columns having higher slenderness ratio requires investigation of in-
plane bending failure by flexural yielding and out-of-plane buckling failure. The
behaviour of beam-columns subject to bending about the minor axis is similar to that
subjected to major axis bending as discussed, but for the following differences:

• In the case of slender members under smaller axial load, there is very little reduction
of moment capacity below Mp, since the lateral torsional buckling is not a problem in
weak axis bending.
• The moment magnification is larger in the case of beam-columns bending about the
weak axis.
• The failure of short/stocky members is either due to section strength being reached at
the ends (under smaller axial load) or at the section of larger magnified moment
(under larger axial load).
• The failure of even slender members is due to buckling about the weak axis only and
no torsional deformation is experienced.
• The M-P failure envelope varies as shown in Fig.6(a), due to the variations of
slenderness ratio and axial force.

Version II 15-13
 DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS-I

3.3 Beam-Column under Biaxial Bending

The ultimate behaviour of beam-columns under biaxial bending is complicated by the

effect of plastification, moment magnification and lateral torsional buckling. Typical
failure envelope diagram is as shown in Fig.8. It is seen that the increase in the
slenderness ratio of the member tends to reduce the strength of the member, except in the
case of nearly pure bending about the weak axis (y axis). Further, but for very small axial
force ranges, increases in the axial compression tend to decrease the bending strength
about both axes.
Fcl/Pcs
1.0
/r = 0

/r increases

1.0 1.0
My/ Mpy Mx/Mpx

Fig. 8 beam-columns under Biaxial Bending

4.0 SUMMARY

Behaviour of beam-columns, which are members subjected to axial compression and

bending simultaneously, was discussed in this chapter. The following were the main
issues discussed in the chapter.

• The moment magnification due to P- and P- effects are important considerations
affecting their strength, particularly in case of slender members subjected to larger
axial compression.
• Under major axis bending lateral buckling is also an important consideration.
• Flexural yielding, flexural buckling, torsional flexural buckling are the different
modes of failure, depending upon the slenderness ratio, axis of bending and extent of
axial compression.

In the next chapter, II of this topic, evaluation of strength of beam-columns will be dealt
with and steps in designing beam-columns will be presented supported by an example.

Version II 15-14