CONSTITUTIONAL DESIGN

PART A (Not to be written in the notebook)

Democratic Constitution in South Africa
(a) Struggle against Apartheid: Apartheid referred to the policy of discrimination an the
basis of race as practiced by the government of South Africa. The main features of
this policy were as follows:
i. All people were classified and separated on the basis of race.
ii. Each group had to live in a separate area.
iii. There were separate schools and universities, separate shopping centers, separate
coaches in trains.
iv. Marriage between persons belonging to two races was a criminal offence.
v. There were restriction on movement from one place to another.
vi. Non-whites had no votes.
vii. They had no say in the governance of the country. In short, the policy of apartheid
human denied human rights and rendered the government of South Africa as
among the most oppressive regimes in the world in the 20th century.

(b) The end of the Policy of Apartheid: In 1910 the African National Congress was
formed which aimed at establishing a non-racial democratic South Africa.
i. The movement was intensified in the 1950s. In 1960s, the African National
Congress was banned. The African National Congress organized its own army to
fight against the racial regime.
ii. The UN condemned the policy of South Africa. In the 1980s some western
countries imposed sanctions against South Africa. By the end of the 1980s the
international isolation of the government of South Africa was complete.
iii. With it began the process of ending the apartheid.
iv. The ban on the Africa National Congress was lifted and it leaders released.
Negotiations began between the African National Congress s and South Africa
government for framing a new constitution which would give all South Africans the
right to vote.
v. In April 1994, elections were held in South Africa as per the new provisions. The
African National Congress won with a thumping majority and formed a non-racial
democratic government.
vi. Finally, at the midnight of 26 April 1994, the new national flag of the Republic of
South Africa was unfurled making the newly born democracy in the world.

(c) Towards a new Constitution: The party that had ruled through oppression and
brutal killings and the party that led the freedom struggle sat together to draw up a
common constitution.
i. One of the finest constitutions the world has ever had. It gave to its citizens the
most extensive rights available in any country.
ii. The Constitution makes it clear that in the search for a solution to the problems,
nobody should be excluded, no one should be treated as a demon, everybody
 should become part of the solution, whatever they might have done or represented
in the past.
iii. The South African constitution inspires democrats all over the world. a state
denounced by the entire world till recently as the most undemocratic one is now
seen as a model of democracy.

(d) Nelson Mandela- Gandhi of South Africa:

i. Nelson Mandela was one of the most able, efficient and far-sighted leaders of the
African national Congress.
ii. It was under his leadership that the struggle against apartheid reached its climax.
Due to participation in the movement against apartheid he was sentenced to life
imprisonment in 1964.
iii. He spent the next 28 years in prison.
iv. In the 90s due to activities of the African National Congress and the support it got
from other countries of the world, South African regime was completely isolated
from the world.
v. In order to create a favourable atmosphere Nelson Mandela was released in 1990.
In 1994 the first democratic elections were held and Nelson Mandela was elected
the President of South Africa.
 i. All countries that have constitutions are not necessarily democratic. But all
countries that are democratic will have constitutions.
ii. After the War of independence against Great Britain, the Americans gave
themselves a constitution.
iii. After the Revolution, the French people approved a democratic
constitution. Since then it has become a practice in all democracies to have
a written constitution.
Making of Indian Constitution
The making of the constitution for a huge and diverse country like India was not an
easy affair.
(i) The people of India were emerging from the status of subjects to that of
citizens.
(ii) The country was born through a partition on the basis of religious
differences. At least ten lakh people were killed on both sides of the border
in partition related violence.
(iii) The British had left it to the rulers of the princely states to decide whether
they wanted to merge with Indian or with Pakistan or remain independent.
The merger of these princely states was difficult and uncertain task.
(iv) When the constitution was being written, the makers of the constitution had
anxieties about the present and the future of the country.

The path to constitution:

i. Our national movement was not merely a struggle against a foreign rule. It was
also a struggle to rejuvenate our country and to transform our society and
politics.
ii. The familiarity with political institutions of colonial rule also helped develop an
agreement over the institutional design. The experience gained by Indians in
the working of the legislative institutions proved to be very useful for the country
in setting up its own institutions.
iii. Many of our leaders were inspired by the ideals of French Revolutions, the
practice of Parliamentary democracy in Britain and Bill of Rights in USA. So
they incorporated some good points of the Constitution of these in the Indian
Constitution.
iv. They also got inspiration from the Constitution drafted by Moti Lal Nehru and
eight other Congress leaders in 1928, and the outlines of the Indian
Constitution prepared by the Indian National Congress at its Karachi session
in 1931.
The Constituent Assembly:
i. The Constitution of India was framed by a Constituent Assembly set up under
the Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946. The assembly consisted of 389 members
representing provinces (292), states (93), the chief commissioner provinces (3)
and Baluchistan (1).
 ii. The assembly held its first meeting on December 6, 1946. It elected Dr.
Rajendra Prasad as its Chairman.
iii. Soon after the country was partitioned into India and Pakistan. The Constituent
Assembly was also divided into the Constituent Assembly of India and that of
Pakistan.
iv. The Constituent Assembly that wrote the India Constitution had 299 members.
The Assembly adopted the Constitution on 26 November 1949 but it came into
effect on January 26, 1950.
v. To mark this day we celebrate January 26 as Republic Day every year.
Why should we accept the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more
than 50 years ago?
(i) The Constitution does not reflect the views of its members alone. it expresses a
broad consensus of its time. Many countries of the world have had to rewrite their
constitution afresh because the basic rules were not accepted to all major social
groups or political parties. In some other countries, the Constitution exists as a mere
piece of paper. No one actually follows it. The experience of our constitution is
different. Over the last half a century, several groups have questioned some provisions
of the Constitution. But no large social group or political party has ever questioned the
legitimacy of the Constitution itself. This is an unusual achievement for any
constitution.
(ii) The Constituent Assembly represented the people of India. There was no universal
adult franchise at that time. So the Constituent assembly could not have been chosen
directly by all the people of India. It was elected mainly by the members of the existing
Provincial Legislatures. This ensured a fair geographical share of members from all
the regions of the country. The Assembly represented members from different
language groups, castes, classes, religions and occupations.
(iii) The manner in which the Constituent Assembly worked gives sanctity to the
Constitution:
a. The Constituent Assembly worked in a systematic, open and consensual
manner. First some basic principles were decided and agreed upon.
b. Then a Drafting Committee chaired by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar prepared a draft
constitution for discussion.
c. Several rounds of through discussion took place on the Draft Constitution,
clause by clause. More than two thousand amendments were considered.
d. Every document presented and every word spoken in the Constituent assembly
has been recorded and preserved. These are called ‘Constituent Assembly
Debates. When printed, these debates are 12 bulky volumes. These debates
provide the rationale behind every provision of the Constitution. These are used
to interpret the meaning of the Constitution.
Indian Constitution: A Living Document:
Those who crafted the Indian Constitution felt that it has to be in accordance with
people’s aspirations and changes in society.
They did not see it as a sacred, static and unalterable law. So, they made provisions
to incorporate changes from time to time.
These changes are called constitutional amendments. The amendment procedure
provided in the constitution is as follows. There are three categories of amendments:
(i) In the first category, amendments can be done by simple majority of
members present and voting before sending it for the President’s assent.
(ii) In the second category, amendments require a special majority. Such an
amendment can be passed by each house of Parliament by the two-thirds
majority of the members of the house present and voting and then sent to
the President for his assent.
(iii) The third category, amendments is really difficult to pass. Besides the
special majority mentioned in the second category, the same has to be
approved by at least 50 percent of the state legislatures.
Philosophy of the Constitution:
The philopsphy of the Indian constitution has been described in the Preamble of
the constitution.
 PART B – To be written in notebook
Answer the following in not more than 80 words:
1. Define apartheid \ segregation.
2. What kind of understanding did the two communities in South Africa come to prior
to the drafting of the Constitution?
3. What is a Constitution? Why do we need a Constitution?
Answer the following in not more than 100-110 words:
1. How was the majority population in South Africa treated by the minority white
government?
2. How was apartheid opposed by both the international community and the people
of South Africa?