PPFP
PPFP
Abstract
Background: Despite Ethiopia’s efforts to avail postpartum family planning (PPFP) services, the unmet need for
family planning among postpartum women remains high. Therefore, this study is aimed to assess barriers and
determinants of postpartum family-planning uptake among women visiting Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health
(MNCH) services in public health facilities of western Ethiopia.
Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study design with a quantitative method was conducted on 989
postpartum women in Western Ethiopia from September 1 to October 30, 2020. Data were collected through face-
to-face interviews using pretested structured questionnaires, entered using EPI-INFO version 7.0, and analyzed by
SPSS version 25. Descriptive analysis and logistic regressions were performed. The adjusted odds ratio with a 95%
confidence interval was used and statistical significance was declared at P-value < 0.05.
Result: In this study, 56.1% of participants had used PPFP in the last year. The most commonly used method was
injectable (51.7%). Family planning use before the index pregnancy (AOR = 2.09;95%CI:1.29,3,41),counselling on PPFP
during antenatal care and delivery (AOR = 4.89;95%CI:2.31,10.37),health facility delivery (AOR = 7.61;95%CI:4.36,13.28),
skilled birth attendance (AOR = 4.99;95%CI:2.88,8.64),COVID-19 restrictions (AOR = 0.59;95%CI:0.39,0.90) were factors
associated with PPFP utilization. Being breastfeeding and amenorrhea were major reasons for not using postpartum
family planning.
Conclusion: Post-partum family planning utilization among study participants was low. Given the associated
factors, it is recommended that health facilities should make postpartum family planning one of their top priorities
and focus on these factors to improve its utilization.
Keywords: Post-partum, Family planning, Barriers, Western Ethiopia
* Correspondence: ttamuko@[Link]
1
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of medicine, Institute of
Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if
changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons
licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons
licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain
permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit [Link]
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ([Link] applies to the
data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Tilahun et al. Archives of Public Health (2022) 80:27 Page 2 of 11
Postpartum mother who gave her consent to the and well trained female BSC nurses,who were not work-
study. ing in the same facility/study area, for data collection.
Table 2 Maternal health service utilization among study had attended postnatal care from 2 to 6 weeks. Two
participants, Western Ethiopia, 2020 hundred eight (37.6%) of participants attended postnatal
Variables Frequency Percent care before the end of one week. More than 99% of these
Parity women attended postnatal care at health facilities. Eight
1 277 28.0 hundred thirteen (82.2%) of the women are reported to
be currently breastfeeding (Table 2).
2 to 3 481 48.6
≥4 231 23.4
Family planning methods used before the index
Unintended pregnancy pregnancy
Yes 109 11.0 The participants were asked whether they had used any
No 880 89.0 methods of the family before index pregnancy and it
Abortion showed that the majority, 68.80%, of postpartum
mothers had used at least one method of family planning
Yes 136 13.8
methods before the index pregnancy. Injectable forms
No 853 86.20
and implants were the commonly used methods (Fig. 1).
ANC during the index pregnancy
Yes 817 82.6 Post-partum family planning use among study
No 172 17.4 participants
Place of delivery Five hundred thirteen (51.9%) of the study participants
didn’t discuss family planning with their husbands in the
Health Facility 808 81.7
last year. However, more than half the participants 555
Home 181 18.3
(56.1%) had used family planning in the last year. The
Postnatal care most common family planning methods used by partici-
Yes 744 75.2 pants were injectable form 287(51.7%) followed by im-
No 245 24.8 plants (24.5%) (Fig. 2).
Time of Postnatal care visit Among those who used the postpartum family plan-
ning method majority, 267(48.1%) started the family
Within the first week 280 37.6
planning method on the 45th day while those who
2 to 6 weeks 341 45.8
started within a week and between six weeks to six
> 6 weeks 123 16.5 months were 136(24.5%) and 91(16.4%) respectively. The
Currently breastfeeding main source of family planning method was health cen-
Yes 813 82.20 ter 409(73.7%) followed by hospital 94(16.9%).
No 176 17.80 Four hundred one (72.3%) of postpartum family plan-
ning users reported as they were using the method they
Fig. 1 Family planning utilization before the index pregnancy among study participants, Western Ethiopia, 2020
Tilahun et al. Archives of Public Health (2022) 80:27 Page 6 of 11
Fig. 2 Postpartum family planning utilization among study participants, Western Ethiopia, 2020
preferred. The foremost mentioned reasons for prefer- the uptake of postpartum family planning services. After
ence of the methods were a convenience for use adjusting for confounding factors in the multivariate ana-
172(40.6%) and being comfortable to health 180(42.5%). lysis, factors that significantly associated with utilization of
On the other hand, the reasons mentioned by those par- postpartum family planning services were history of using
ticipants who were using the non-preferred method were family planning before the index pregnancy, previous his-
medical condition 78(59.5%) and lack of the preferred tory of postpartum family planning utilization, counseling
method in the health facility 58(40.5%). during delivery on postpartum family planning utilization,
Participants were asked if they did face difficulty acces- place of delivery, a skilled birth attendant at birth and
sing the family planning service during COVID-19 pan- COVID-19 restrictions. The number of parties and ANC
demics and one hundred fifty-seven (15.9%) responded attendance for the index pregnancy were not significantly
as they did. The most common stated difficulties we’re associated with the service utilization in this study.
unable to get transportation 100(63.7%) and absence of Participants who had been counseled during antenatal
health extension workers 68(43.31%) while fear of care and delivery about postpartum family planning were
acquiring coronavirus accounts for 19(12.1%) (Table 3). 4.89 times more likely to use the service compared to
Moreover, 434(43.9%) of the study participants didn’t their counterparts [AOR = 4.89 (2.31, 10.37)]. Postpar-
use any form of family planning method. A quarter of tum mothers who gave birth at the health facility were
them mentioned the reasons for not using were breast- more than 7,61 times likely to use the postpartum family
feeding 114(26.3%) and menses not yet resumed planning service compared to those delivered at home
109(25.1%) [Fig. 3]. [AOR = 7.61 (4.36, 13.28)]. It was also checked whether
a skilled birth attendant is associated with the service
Factors affecting uptake of postpartum family planning utilization and the multivariable logistic regression result
service utilization indicated that those mothers who were assisted by
In bivariate analysis, utilization of postpartum family plan- skilled birth attendants at birth were around 4.99 times
ning services was significantly associated with variables more likely to uptake the service compare to those
like great or equal to para two, history of using family assisted by non-skilled attendants [AOR = 4.99 (2.88,
planning before the index pregnancy, previous history of 8.64)]. Postpartum family planning utilization was also 2
postpartum family planning utilization, counseling given times higher among mothers who had used family
during antenatal follow-up, and delivery on postpartum planning before the index pregnancy [AOR = 2.09 (1.29,
family planning utilization, place of delivery, a skilled birth 3.41)].
attendant at birth, and ANC attendance for the index COVID-19 restrictions were checked whether it af-
pregnancy. However, currently living with husband, his- fected uptake of the service and the result indicated that
tory of abortion, history of unintended pregnancy, and those postpartum mothers who faced restrictions of
COVID-19 restrictions have no positive association with COVID-19 were by 39.5% less likely to use postpartum
Fig. 3 Reasons for not using family planning among study participants, Western Ethiopia, 2020
Tilahun et al. Archives of Public Health (2022) 80:27 Page 8 of 11
Table 4 Multivariable Logistic Regression of factors affecting PPFP uptake among study participants, Western Ethiopia, 2020
Variables PPFP utilization COR at 95% C. I AOR at 95% C. P-value
I
Yes No
Parity
1 219 (79.1%) 58 (20.9%) 0.24 (0.17, 0.34) 1.21 (0.80, 1.82) 0.36
2 to 3 231 (48%) 250 (52%) 0.22(0.15, 0.33) 1.18(0.71,1.73)
≥4 105 (45.5%) 126 (54.5%) 1
Family planning utilization before the index Pregnancy
Yes 491 (68.5%) 226 (31.5%) 7.06 (5.12, 9.74) 2.09 (1.29, 3.41) 0.03*
No 64 (23.5%) 208 (76.5%) 1
Previous history of PPFP utilization
Yes 277 (51.0%) 266 (49.0%) 1.90 (1.33, 2.73) 1.07 (0.55, 2.07) 0.89
No 59 (35.3%) 108 (64.7%) 1
Counseling on PPFP during ANC & delivery
Yes 447 (59.4%) 306 (40.6%) 1.73 (1.29, 2.32) 4.89 (2.31, 10.36) 0.00*
No 108 (45.8%) 128 (54.2%) 1
Place of delivery
Health facility 525 (65.0%) 283 (35.0%) 9.34 (6.15, 14.18) 7.61 (4.35, 13.28) 0.00*
Home 30 (16.6%) 151 (83.4%) 1
Skilled birth attendance
Yes 450 (53.5%) 391 (46.5%) 2.12 (1.45, 3.10) 4.99 (2.87, 8.63) 0.00*
No 105 (70.9%) 43 (29.1%) 1
Faced difficulty during COVID-19 restrictions
Yes 185 (53.6%) 160 (46.4%) 1.17 (0.9, 1.52) 0.59 (0.39, 0.9) 0.01*
No 370 (57.5%) 274 (42.5%) 1
ANC during the index pregnancy
Yes 430 (58.8%) 301 (41.2%) 1.52 (1.14, 2.02) 1.03 (0.65, 1.65) 0.89
No 125 (48.4%) 133 (51.6%) 1
*statistically significant
family planning services compared to those who did face finding is higher than studies conducted in Pakistan (24.6%)
restrictions [AOR = 0.59 (0.39, 0.90)] (Table 4). [26], Nigeria (40.6%) [14], Liberia(11.9%) [15], Uganda (28%)
[16], and Aroressa district in Southern Ethiopia (31.7%) [13].
Discussion However, postpartum family planning uptake in this study is
This study is aimed to assess barriers and determinants lower than studies conducted in Kenya (78.4%) [17], Debre
of postpartum family planning uptake among postpar- Tabor town in Ethiopia (63%) [18], and Hosanna town in
tum women in western Ethiopia. The study identified Ethiopia (73.9%) [12]. The low uptake in the current study
numerous factors that affect its uptake among postpar- might be explained by perceptions of low pregnancy risk due
tum women in western Ethiopia. to breastfeeding and postpartum amenorrhea.
Nearly all of the study participants, (98.5%), had heard In this study, the most common type of postpartum
of at least one method of family planning. This is similar family planning used by participants was injectable
to studies conducted in Hossana town, Southern (51.7%) followed by Implants (24.5%]. This finding is
Ethiopia (98.6%) [12], and Aroressa (99.7%) [13]. How- similar to different studies conducted in Aroressa district
ever, the finding of the current study is higher compared [13], Hossana town [12], Debretabor town [18], and the
to the study conducted in Bahirdar town, Northern Tigray region [34] in Ethiopia. This might be due to the
Ethiopia [11]. This discrepancy could have resulted from similarity of the socio-cultural status of the community
differences in the study setting and period. and user preferences. However, studies conducted in
In the current study, despite the high level of awareness, Pakistan [28], China [29], and Nigeria [21] showed con-
the uptake of postpartum family planning was 56.1%. This doms as the preferred method among study participants.
Tilahun et al. Archives of Public Health (2022) 80:27 Page 9 of 11
The difference might be due to the study setting, aware- compare to those assisted by non-skilled attendants.
ness of the women about specific methods, and method This is similar to the study conducted in Burundi and
mix strategies that different countries follow. Rwanda where skilled birth attendance significantly af-
In this study, 72.3% of study participants were using fected the utilization of PPFP [16]. This could be be-
the method they preferred. The most preferred method cause of the counseling health providers do during
of contraceptive was injectable (64.39%.). However, be- delivery.
cause of the lack of the preferred method and medical The current study is conducted in the era of the
contraindications, only 72.3% of study participants were COVID-19 pandemic where there are restrictions. The
using the method they preferred. In Iran, the most pre- result indicated that those participants who faced diffi-
ferred method of family planning was minipills (29.3%) culties during the COVID-19 pandemic were 39% less
[19]. the study conducted in Turkey [35%] [20] and likely to use postpartum family planning services com-
Rwanda (52%) [21], showed LARC methods as the most pared to those who did not face it. This is in line with
preferred method. The difference could be due to differ- the projection that some 47 million women in 114 low-
ences in the study setting and the strategies different and middle-income countries are to be unable to use
countries are following. modern contraceptives if the average lockdown, or
In this study, 45.9% of the study participant did not COVID-19-related disruption, continues for 6 months
start using any form of family planning methods. The with major disruptions to services [25]. The authors rec-
major reasons mentioned were being breastfeeding ommended the health sector design an effective option
(26.3%) and failure of menses to resume 109(25.1%). to maintain postpartum family planning services during
This could lead postpartum women to unintended preg- COVID-19 restrictions or related health crises.
nancies, abortions, and unplanned births [22]. Poor male In this study, it is revealed that there is no associ-
engagement could also contribute to low utilization. ation between ANC attendance and uptake of post-
Postpartum women experience amenorrhea for varying partum family planning. This is consistent with
lengths of time, and their fertility can return before another finding in which no difference in PPFP use
menses resume, even when breastfeeding [2]. Therefore, was observed between women who received PPFP
health professionals better deal with these misconcep- counseling only in ANC and women who did not
tions during counseling. Other studies in other countries receive counseling at all [24].
identified different reasons. For instance, desire for more
children and husband objection, and post-partum ab-
Strengths and limitations of this study
stinence followed by fear of side effects of the methods
This study is the first of its kind invoving two regions,
and being breastfeeding were the dominant reasons in
Oromia and Benshangul Gumuz regions, in western
Turkey [20] and Liberia [15]. These differences might be
Ethiopia. The relatively large sample size and high re-
explained by differences in the study setting, cultural dif-
sponse rate could make the findings generalisable to
ferences, and health policies.
postpartum women in western Ethiopia. However, it was
In the current study, participants who used family
not without limitations. First, given the cross-sectional
planning before the index pregnancy were twice more
design of the study, it was not possible to establish
likely to use postpartum family planning than their
cause-effect relationships of postpartum family planning
counterparts. This is similar to the conducted in Addis
uptake with independent variables. Second, partners
Ababa where women who had no history of contracep-
(husbands) and health care provider perspectives were
tive use before their last birth were 88% less likely to use
not addressed.
the family planning method during the postpartum
period compared to those who had [23]. Therefore, pro-
moting family planning utilization before pregnancy is Conclusion and recommendations
essential to improve postpartum utilization. Post-partum family planning utilization among study
Participants who received counseling on postpartum participants was low. Given the associated factors, it is
family planning during antenatal follow-up and delivery recommended that health facilities should make postpar-
were five times more likely to utilize the services com- tum family planning one of their top priorities and focus
pared to those with not counseled. This is similar to the on these factors to improve its utilization.
study conducted in Southern Ethiopia [24]. Therefore,
strengthening counseling on postpartum family planning Abbreviations
is important to promote its uptake. ANC: Antenatal care; AOR: adjusted odds ratio; COVID-19: corona virus
This study showed that those participants who were disease 19; HSDP: Health Sector Development Plan; IUCD: Intrauterine
Contraceptive Device; LAM: lactational amenorrhea; LMICs: low and middle-
assisted by skilled birth attendants at birth were 7 times income countries; OR: odds ratio; PNC: postnatal care; PPFP: Postpartum
more likely to utilize postpartum family planning Family Planning; WHO: World Health Organization
Tilahun et al. Archives of Public Health (2022) 80:27 Page 10 of 11
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.