0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views8 pages

Computing Research Project Unit Guide

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views8 pages

Computing Research Project Unit Guide

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Unit 16: Computing Research Project

(Pearson-set)

Unit code K/618/7425

Unit type Core

Unit level 5

Credit value 30

Introduction
This unit is assessed through a Pearson-set assignment. Students will choose their
own project based on a theme provided by Pearson (this will change annually). The
project must be related to their specialist pathway of study (unless the student is
studying the general computing pathway). This will enable students to explore and
examine a relevant and current topical aspect of computing in the context of a
business environment and their chosen specialist pathway.
The aim of this unit is to give students the opportunity to engage in sustained
research in a specific field of study. Students will be able to demonstrate the capacity
and ability to identify a research theme, to develop research aims, objectives and
outcomes, and to present the outcomes of such research in both written and verbal
formats. Students are encouraged to reflect on their engagement in the research
process, during which recommendations for personal development are key learning
points.
On successful completion of this unit, students will have the confidence to engage in
problem-solving and research activities. Students will have fundamental knowledge
and skills that will enable them to investigate workplace issues and problems,
determine appropriate solutions and present evidence to various stakeholders in an
acceptable and understandable format.
Students will have developed skills such as communication literacy, critical thinking,
analysis, synthesis, reasoning, and interpretation, which are crucial for gaining
employment and developing academic competence.

Pearson BTEC Levels 4 and 5 Higher Nationals in Computing


204 Specification – Issue 4 – May 2023 © Pearson Education Limited 2023
Learning Outcomes
By the end of this unit students will be able to:
LO1 Examine appropriate research methodologies and approaches as part of the
research process
LO2 Conduct and analyse research relevant to a computing research project
LO3 Communicate the outcomes of a research project to identified stakeholders
LO4 Reflect on the application of research methodologies and concepts.

Pearson BTEC Levels 4 and 5 Higher Nationals in Computing


Specification – Issue 4 – May 2023 © Pearson Education Limited 2023
205
Essential Content

LO1 Examine appropriate research methodologies and approaches as part of


the research process

Developing a research proposition:


The importance of developing methodical and valid propositions as the
foundation for a research project.
Rationale: the purpose and significance for research question or hypothesis.
The value of the philosophical position of the researcher and the chosen
methods.
Use of Saunders’ Research Onion as a guide to establishing a methodological
approach.

Literature review:
Conceptualisation of the research problem or hypothesis.
The importance of positioning a research project in context of existing
knowledge.
Significance and means of providing benchmarks by which data can be judged.

Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research methodologies:


Key theoretical frameworks for research.
Advantages and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research approaches
and methods.

LO2 Conduct and analyse research relevant to a computing research project

Research as a process:
Follow distinct phases of research to support a coherent and logical argument
including using secondary research to inform a primary, empirical study.
Identify the reason and goal of the business research project, e.g. solving
identified problems, business expansion, improve competitiveness, response to
developments in technology, changes in the industry.
Elicite information from stakeholders.
Application of key skills and behaviours to guide the research project and ensure
success, e.g. critical thinking, analysis and reasoning, dealing with difficult
situations, misunderstanding or mistakes.

Pearson BTEC Levels 4 and 5 Higher Nationals in Computing


206 Specification – Issue 4 – May 2023 © Pearson Education Limited 2023
Selecting a sample:
The importance of gathering primary and secondary data and information
(qualitative or quantitative) to support research analysis.
Selecting sample types and sizes that are relevant to the research.
Considering sampling approaches and techniques, including probability and
non-probability (random) sampling.

Ethics, reliability and validity:


Conduct research ethically including reporting of findings.
Consider how to ensure reliable and valid research.

Analysing data:
Using data collection tools such as interviews and questionnaires.
Using analytical techniques such as trend analysis, coding and typologies.

LO3 Communicate the outcomes of a research project to identified


stakeholders

Stakeholders:
Techniques to support the identification and analysis of internal and external
stakeholders.
Stakeholder analysis to determine approaches to communications, including
who the stakeholders are, high and low priority status, type of communication,
frequency of communication, level to which the project outcomes are conveyed.

Communicating research outcomes:


Consideration of different methods of communicating outcomes, e.g. written
word, spoken word, and the medium, e.g. report, online, presentation. The
method and medium will be influenced by the research and its intended
audience.
Considerations when communicating with stakeholders, e.g. maintaining privacy
and security, tone of voice, use of technical vocabulary or jargon, maintaining or
promoting company image.

Convincing arguments:
No matter what the method/medium, all research should be convincing and
presented logically where the assumption is that the audience has little or no
knowledge of the research process.
The importance of developing evaluative conclusions.

Pearson BTEC Levels 4 and 5 Higher Nationals in Computing


Specification – Issue 4 – May 2023 © Pearson Education Limited 2023
207
LO4 Reflect on the application of research methodologies and concepts

Reflection for learning and practice:


Difference between reflecting on performance and evaluating a research project.
The former considers the research process; the latter considers the quality of the
research argument and use of evidence.
Reflection on the merits, limitations and potential pitfalls of the chosen methods.

The cycle of reflection:


To include reflection in action and reflection on action.
Considering how to use reflection to inform future behaviour and future
considerations.

Reflective writing:
Avoiding generalisation and focusing on personal development and the research
journey in a critical and objective way.

Pearson BTEC Levels 4 and 5 Higher Nationals in Computing


208 Specification – Issue 4 – May 2023 © Pearson Education Limited 2023
Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria

Pass Merit Distinction


LO1 Examine appropriate research methodologies and
approaches as part of the research process LO1 and LO2

P1 Produce a research M1 Analyse different D1 Critically evaluate


proposal that clearly research approaches and research methodologies
defines a research methodology and make and processes in
question or hypothesis, justifications for the choice application to a computing
supported by a literature of methods selected based research project to justify
review. on philosophical/theoretical chosen research methods
frameworks. and analysis.
P2 Examine appropriate
research methods and
approaches to primary
and secondary research.

LO2 Conduct and analyse research relevant to a


computing research project

P3 Conduct primary and M2 Discuss merits,


secondary research using limitations and pitfalls of
appropriate methods for a approaches to data
computing research collection and analysis.
project that consider costs,
access and ethical issues.

P4 Apply appropriate
analytical tools, analyse
research findings and
data.

Pearson BTEC Levels 4 and 5 Higher Nationals in Computing


Specification – Issue 4 – May 2023 © Pearson Education Limited 2023
209
Pass Merit Distinction
LO3 Communicate the outcomes of a research project to
identified stakeholders

P5 Communicate research M3 Analyse the extent to D2 Evaluate outcomes and


outcomes in an which outcomes meet set make valid, justified
appropriate manner for research objectives and recommendations.
the intended audience. communicate judgements
effectively for the intended
audience

LO4 Reflect on the application of research


methodologies and concepts

P6 Discuss the M4 Analyse results in D3 Demonstrate reflection


effectiveness of research recommended actions for and engagement in the
methods applied, for improvements and future resource process, leading
meeting objectives of the research considerations. to recommended actions
computing research for future improvement.
project.

P7 Discuss alternative
research methodologies
and lessons learnt in view
of the outcomes.

Pearson BTEC Levels 4 and 5 Higher Nationals in Computing


210 Specification – Issue 4 – May 2023 © Pearson Education Limited 2023
Recommended Resources

Textbooks
Cornford, T., Smithson S. (2005) Project Research in Information Systems: A Student’s
Guide. Paperback. Palgrave Macmillan.
Costley, C., Elliott, G. and Gibbs, P. (2010) Doing Work Based Research: Approaches to
Enquiry for Insider-researchers. London: SAGE.
Fink, A. (2020) Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper.
5th edn. Sage Publications Inc.
Flick, U. (2020) Introducing Research Methodology: A Beginner’s Guide to Doing a Research
Project. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Gray, D.E. (2009) Doing Research in the Real World. 2nd edn. London: SAGE.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2012) Research Methods for Business Students.
6th edn. Harlow: Pearson.
Wellington, J. (2000) Educational Research: Contemporary Issues and Practical
Approaches. Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.

Journals
International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research

Links
This unit links to the following related units:
Unit 3: Professional Practice
Unit 6: Planning a Computing Project (Pearson-set)
Unit 7: Software Development Lifecycles.

Pearson BTEC Levels 4 and 5 Higher Nationals in Computing


Specification – Issue 4 – May 2023 © Pearson Education Limited 2023
211

Common questions

Powered by AI

Saunders’ Research Onion provides a structured framework to guide researchers in selecting suitable methodologies. It helps navigate philosophical positions, strategies, choices of method, and time horizons, thus ensuring a comprehensive design that supports the research's objectives and improves the validity of outcomes .

Students should critically assess their chosen methods by reflecting on the research process and recognizing potential shortcomings. This involves understanding the limitations of data collection techniques used and considering alternative methodologies that could be applied to refine future projects, thereby enhancing the research's robustness and credibility .

Selecting appropriate methodologies is crucial to ensuring the research's reliability and validation. Different methodologies provide distinct advantages and limitations which need careful consideration to create valid research propositions and align with the researcher's philosophical stance. This careful selection impacts the overall quality and applicability of the research findings .

Ethical considerations are integrated through ensuring that research is conducted ethically with transparent reporting of findings. This involves handling data responsibly and ensuring the validity and reliability of the research process, which is crucial for maintaining integrity and trustworthiness in research outputs .

The specification recommends identifying and analyzing internal and external stakeholders to determine communication approaches, keeping in mind privacy, security, and appropriate tone of voice. Communication methods should be chosen based on the research nature and intended audience to ensure that results are compelling and logically presented .

Engaging in both primary and secondary research provides a well-rounded data set that enhances the depth and breadth of the research findings. Primary research offers specific insights pertinent to the researcher’s objectives, while secondary research provides context and benchmarks from existing knowledge, both critical for a comprehensive analysis .

Key components of developing a research proposition include creating methodical and valid propositions as the foundation of a research project, understanding the purpose and significance of the research question or hypothesis, and recognizing the value of the researcher's philosophical position and chosen methods .

Reflection is essential for evaluating the research process and the quality of the argument and evidence used. It involves considering the merits and limitations of chosen methods and how these can inform future behavior and research considerations. Reflection for learning and practice is emphasized to improve personal development and research execution in subsequent projects .

Students should present findings in a manner tailored to the audience, using methods such as written reports, presentations, or online publications. The goal is to convey findings clearly and persuasively, ensuring stakeholders understand the research implications and potential actions, maintaining a logical, well-argued presentation regardless of the medium .

Qualitative research methods allow for in-depth understanding of phenomena and are more flexible in exploring patterns, which is advantageous in understanding complex behaviors. However, they might lack the generalizability of quantitative methods, which provide statistical, generalizable data but might miss depth and contextual nuances. Both methods offer unique insights that can be complementary in mixed-method approaches .

You might also like