CA Inter Costing RTP January 2025
CA Inter Costing RTP January 2025
com
PAPER – 4:
COST AND MANAGEMENT
ACCOUNTING
QUESTIONS
Following information is extracted from the books of Mr. Rishi for the
current year:
(iii) What is the transfer price value at which the output of Process III is
transferred to Finished Stock?
(a) ` 5,40,88,500
(b) ` 3,98,91,140
(c) ` 2,94,44,860
(d) ` 6,93,36,000
(iv) What is the cost value at which the output of Process III is trans-
ferred to Finished Stock?
(a) ` 5,40,88,500
(b) ` 3,98,91,140
(c) ` 2,94,44,860
(d) ` 6,93,36,000
(v) What is the cost value of closing stock of Process III A/c?
(a) ` 20,86,500
(b) ` 15,64,884
(c) ` 3,98,91,140
(d) ` 5,21,616
Employee Cost and Direct Expenses
3. Phalsa Ltd. pays its workers on time-basis because their services cannot
be tangibly measured. The company’s normal working week includes 5
days of 8 hours each. Sometimes, the workers needs to work late at
night which was 3 nights of 3 hours each for the current week. The
average output produced per worker for the week is 120 units.
Information regarding incentive rate is as follows:
Rate of Payment Day shift: ` 320 per hour
Night shift: ` 450 per hour
for higher earnings with minimal impact on the outputs, the company
decided to shift on to a system of payments on output basis.
Information regarding amended incentive rate is as follows:
(b) ` 14,95,000
(c) ` 26,39,000
(d) ` 34,91,540
Joint Products and By products
6. ICT Ltd. belongs to pharmaceutical industries. The chemical process that
ICT Ltd. operates convert one compound into three category of
medicines viz. BetaTab, Folick and TegriCap. Though BetaTab and Folick
are already converted to final product at split-off point, Tegricap needs
further processing along with addition of new compound with it.
The market for BetaTab and Folick is highly active, thus the production is
sold at split-off point, however, Tegricap can be sold only after further
processing.
Following information is provided for the current year:
The selling price is expected to remain the same for coming years.
The total joint manufacturing costs till split-off point is ` 62,50,000 and
the amount spent for further processing w.r.t. Tegricap is ` 31,00,000
The details regarding closing inventories are as follows:
You are required to COMPUTE the joint cost allocated to BetaTab, Folick
and TegriCap using Net realizable value (NRV) method.
(a) BetaTab- ` 15,65,481, Folick - ` 33,26,647 and TegriCap -
` 13,57,872
The existing rate of wages is ` 60 per hour along with bonus as per
Halsey System.
However, a new wage agreement has been signed between the
employees and the company where, employees will be paid ` 65 per
hour with effect from the April month. But, inadvertently, for the month
of March, the accountant of the company paid the wages to these
employees considering rate of wages as ` 65 per hour.
You are required to CALCULATE the following:
(i) Amount of loss that the company has incurred due to incorrect
rate selection in the month of March.
Particulars A B C
Sales (`) 60,00,000 90,00,000 54,00,000
Cost of Sales (`) 30,00,000 78,00,000 27,00,000
Area of storage ([Link].) 72,000 1,08,000 36,000
Number of parcels sent 2,40,000 3,00,000 2,10,000
Number of invoices sent 60,000 90,000 1,44,000
You are required to PREPARE a cost sheet for ‘silicon’ phone cover
showing Cost and Profit (per unit and Total).
Cost Accounting Systems
12. Following information is extracted as a result of scrutiny of the figures
from both the financial accounts and cost accounts of CK Ltd. for the
year ending 31st March:
Particulars Amount
(`)
Net Profit (as per cost accounts) 57,71,840
Under recovery of selling overheads in cost accounts 1,16,800
Under valuation of closing stock in cost accounts 1,64,000
Rent received credited in financial accounts 87,200
Bad debts provided in financial accounts 52,000
Income tax provided in financial accounts 2,54,400
Under recovery of administration overheads in cost 1,50,400
accounts
You are required to PREPARE a Statement of Reconciliation showing the
profit as per financial records.
Batch Costing
13. Phonick Ltd. accepted an order to supply 2,000 units per month of
Product ‘E’ for the third quarter of the year. Each monthly batch order
records the actual costs of materials and labour. Overheads are charged
at a rate per labour hour. The selling price is established at ` 15 per unit.
Information relating to Material, Labour and Overheads is provided
below:
Month Batch Material Labour Overheads Total
Output Cost Cost Labour
(Numbers) (`) (`) (`) Hours
October 2,500 12,500 5,000 24,000 8,000
November 3,000 18,000 6,000 18,000 9,000
December 2,000 10,000 4,000 30,000 10,000
Labour is paid at the rate of ` 2 per hour.
CALCULATE the cost and profit per unit of each batch order along with
the overall position of the order for 6,000 units.
Joint Products and By products
14. JPBP Ltd. manufactures two joint products A and B simultaneously from
the same process. The process produces another product C which is
recovered incidentally from the material used in the manufacture of A
and B.
The expenditures incurred up to the point of separation i.e. split-off
point are ` 14,82,000. As the joint products are capable of being
measured in the same units, joint costs are allocated on the basis of
physical unit.
Though the joint products A and B are saleable at split-off point, these
can also be further processed and sold at a higher market price, with
some sales promotion efforts. However, product C can be sold only after
further processing.
The management is of the view that, as the net realisable value of the
product C at split off point is too small, the value may be deducted from
the joint production cost.
The relevant details of the products are as follows:
Particulars Amount
Driver and attendant salary ` 60,000 per person per month
Cleaner’s salary (One cleaner for 2 ` 30,000 per cleaner per
buses) month
Diesel (Avg. 8 kms per litre) ` 160 per litre
Insurance charges (per annum) 2% of Purchase Price
License fees and taxes ` 10,160 per bus per month
Parking charges paid ` 36,000 per month
Repair & maintenance including ` 5,712 per bus
engine oil and lubricants (for
every 5,760 kms)
During the month of April, 2024, actual production was 50,000 kgs. of
‘ABC’ for which the actual quantities of material used for a batch and the
prices paid thereof are as under:
(`)
Original cost estimate 27,50,000
Costs incurred so far 24,80,000
Costs to be incurred 3,70,000
Progress payment received from original customer 15,50,000
After searches, a new customer for the machine has been found. He is
interested to take the machine, if certain modifications are carried out.
The new customer wanted the machine in its original condition, but
without its AI device and with certain other modifications. The costs of
these additions and modifications are estimated as under:
You are required to CALCULATE the minimum price, which the company
can afford to quote for the new customer as staled above.
Budgets and budgetary control
18. BT Ltd. achieves sale of ` 73,12,500 with COGS of 40% while operating at
75% of its normal capacity during the current financial year.
The information relating to Administration, Selling and Distribution costs
is given below:
Administration costs:
Office salaries ` 11,70,000
General expenses 5 per cent of COGS
Depreciation ` 97,500
Rates and taxes ` 1,13,750
Selling costs:
Salaries 8 per cent of sales
Travelling expenses 5 per cent of COGS
Sales office expenses 2.5 per cent of COGS
General expenses 2.5 per cent of COGS
Distribution costs:
Wages ` 1,95,000
Rent 1 per cent of sales
Other expenses 10 per cent of COGS
Considering some of the expenses like office salaries, depreciation, rates
and taxes, and wages, to remain the same irrespective of the level of
activity, as these expenses are fixed in nature, PREPARE flexible
administration, selling and distribution costs budget, operating at 85%,
100% and 115% of normal capacity.
Miscellaneous
19. (a) DISCUSS advantages of Marginal Costing.
(b) LIST DOWN certain financial expenses and income included in
Financial Accounts only.
(c) DISCUSS the treatment of By-product cost in joint cost accounting
when they are of small total value.
(d) DISCUSS normal and abnormal Process Loss and ENUMERATE their
treatment in Cost Accounts.
SUGGESTED ANSWERS/HINTS
Note: Figures are rounded off to the nearest figures to remove approximation
error, wherever required.
Contribution:
• Bottle = 160-80=80
• Geometry = 100- 40 = 60
X = 5925
Units of :
22
Particulars Cost Profit Total Particulars Cost Profit Total (i)
(a)
(`) (`) (`) (`) (`) (`)
*Transfer price
Stock A/c
REVISION TEST PAPER
(Transfer)*
Wages
INTERMEDIATE EXAMINATION
(b)
(`) (`) (`) (`) (`) (`)
Direct -
Direct -
57,78,000 57,78,000
Wages
= ` 1,97,95,000
` 2,63,22,000
Manufactur-
�` 3,04,95,000� x
ing - 38,52,000
38,52,000
Overheads
` 17,12,000 = ` 14,77,726
(d)
Opening 16,05,000 5,35,000 21,40,000 By Finished 3,98,91,140 2,94,44,860 6,93,36,000
Stock Stock A/c**
(Transfer)
**Transfer price
REVISION TEST PAPER
Wages
Manufactur-
ing 35,57,750 -- 35,57,750
Overheads
3,78,98,274
�` 5,05,30,750� x
`
* Cost of Closing Stock = ` 20,86,500
= ` 15,64,884
**Transfer price = (Total Cost - Closing Stock) (1 + 33 1/3%)
= (5,40,88,500 - 20,86,500) x (1 + 33 1/3%)
= ` 6,93,36,000
***Profit on transfer = (5,40,88,500 - 20,86,500) x 33 1/3%
= ` 1,73,34,000
(iv) (b) Refer part (iii) above.
(v) (b) Refer part (iii) above.
3. (a) Calculation of existing labour cost per unit (time basis)
Normal weekly hours = 5 days x 8 hours = 40 hours
Night shift hours = 3 nights x 3 hours = 9 hours
Average production per week = 120 units
Weekly wages:
Normal shift (40 hours × ` 320) ` 12,800
Night shift (9 hours × ` 450) ` 4,050
Total wages ` 16,850
` 16,850
Labour cost per unit = �120 units�
= ` 140.42
Calculation of amended labour cost per unit (piece basis)
15 units are produced in 5 hours
Therefore, to produce 135 units, hours required is
5 hours
�15 units� x 135 units = 45 hours.
Labour cost of producing 135 units:
At basic time rate (45 hours × ` 320) = ` 14,400
Joint cost allocated using Net Realisable Value (at split-off point):
Total Jointcost
× NetRealisable Valueof each product
Total Net Realisable Value
` 62,50,000
BetaTab =� � x ` 54,90,000
` 1,47,01,250
= ` 23,33,985
` 62,50,000
Folick =� � x ` 66,03,750
` 1,47,01,250
= ` 28,07,478
` 62,50,000
TegriCap =� � x ` 26,07,500
` 1,47,01,250
= ` 11,08,537
Change inTotal cost
7. (b) Variable cost per unit =
Change in units
(` 11 x 20,000 units) - (` 11.25 x 16,000 units)
=� �
20,000 units - 16,000 units
` 2,20,000 - ` 1,80,000
=�
4,000 units
� = ` 10
Fixed cost = Total Cost – Variable cost (at 20,000 units level)
= (` 11 x 20,000 units) – (` 10 x 20,000 units)
= ` 20,000
Fixed Costs
(i) Break-even Point (in units) = �Contribution per unit*�
` 20,000
=� �
` 3.333
= 6,000 units
* Contribution is the excess of sales revenue over the
variable costs.
Cash Fixed Costs**
(ii) Cash Break-even Point (in units) = �Contribution per unit�
` 20,000 - ` 5,000
=� �
` 3.333
= 4,500 units
** depreciation and other non-cash fixed costs are excluded
from the fixed costs to compute cash break-even point.
Contributionperunit
(ii) P/V Ratio =
Salepriceperunit
` 3.333
=� �
` 10 + ` 3.333
= 25%
8. Annual demand of material ‘EXE’
= 16,000 units (per quarter) x 4 (No. of Quarter in a year) x 6 kg. (for
every finished product)
= 3,84,000 kg.
(i) Calculation of Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) for material ‘EXE’
2x3,84,000kg.x ` 2,000
= = 16,000 kg.
` 40x15%
Working Notes:
(i) Direct material cost per unit of ‘plastic’ phone cover = M
Direct material cost per unit of ‘silicon’ phone cover = 2M
Total Direct Material Cost = 2M × 1,00,000 units + M × 3,00,000
units
Or, ` 1,00,00,000 = 2,00,000 M + 3,00,000 M
` 1,00,00,000
Or, M = = ` 20
5,00,000
Therefore, Direct material Cost per unit of ‘silicon’ phone cover = 2
× ` 20 = ` 40
(ii) Direct wages per unit for ‘silicon’ phone cover = W
Direct wages per unit for ‘plastic’ phone cover = 0.6W
So, (W x 100,000) + (0.6W x 3,00,000) = ` 56,00,000
Or, 1,00,000 W + 1,80,000 W = ` 56,00,000
` 56,00,000
Or, W = = ` 20 per unit
2,80,000
Therefore, Direct wages per unit of ‘silicon’ phone cover = ` 20
` 32,00,000
(iii) Production overhead per unit = = `8
(1,00,000 + 3,00,000)
Production overhead for ‘silicon’ phone cover = ` 8 × 1,00,000
units = ` 8,00,000
12. Statement of Reconciliation
(Reconciling the profit as per costing records with the profit as per
financial records)
13. Statement of Cost and Profit per unit of each batch order
October November December Total
Working Note:
Calculation of overhead per hour
14. Workings -
1. Product C is produced incidentally from the material used in
the manufacture of A and B, thus, Product C is a By-product.
Per unit
(`)
Selling price after further processing (per kg.) (`) 24
Less: Further Processing Cost (per kg) 8
Further Marketing Cost (per kg) 4
12
= ` 3,082.22 × 2 = ` 6,164.44
16. (i)
Material SQ* × SP AQ** × SP AQ** × AP RSQ*** × SP
(`) (`) (`) (`)
A 27,50,000 33,00,000 34,50,000 26,24,600
(25,000 kg. (30,000 kg. (30,000 kg. (23,860 kg.
× ` 110) × ` 110) × ` 115) × ` 110)
B 48,00,000 40,00,000 41,25,000 45,82,400
(15,000 kg. (12,500 kg. (12,500 kg. (14,320 kg.
× ` 320) × ` 320) × ` 320) × ` 320)
C 69,00,000 46,00,000 40,50,000 65,87,200
(15,000 kg. × (10,000 kg. (10,000 kg. (14,320 kg.
` 460) × ` 460) × ` 405) × ` 460)
Total 1,44,50,000 1,19,00,000 1,16,25,000 1,37,94,200
60 kgs.
A = ×50,000 kgs.=30,000 kgs.
100 kgs
25 kgs.
B = ×50,000 kgs.=12,500 kgs.
100 kgs
20 kgs.
C = ×50,000 kgs.=10,000 kgs.
100 kgs
50 kgs.
A = ×52,500 kgs.=23,860 kgs.
110 kgs
30 kgs.
B = ×52,500 kgs.=14,320 kgs.
110 kgs
30 kgs.
C = ×52,500 kgs.=14,320 kgs.
110 kgs
(i) Material Cost Variance = (Std. Qty. × Std. Price) – (Actual Qty. ×
Actual Price)
Or = (SQ × SP) – (AQ × AP)
(ii) Material Price Variance = Actual Quantity (Std. Price – Actual Price)
= (AQ × SP) – (AQ × AP)
(iii) Material Usage Variance = Std. Price (Std. Qty. – Actual Qty.)
Or = (SQ × SP) – (AQ × SP)
(iv) Material Mix Variance = Std. Price (Revised Std. Qty. – Actual Qty.)
Or = (RSQ × SP) – (AQ × SP)
(v) Material Yield Variance = Std. Price (Std. Qty. – Revised Std. Qty.)
Or = (SQ × SP) – (RSQ × SP)
(`) (`)
Cost to be incurred to bring the machine in its 3,70,000
original condition
Direct Material (Replacement Value) 1,50,000
Direct Wages
Dept. X: (35 men days × ` 1,000) 35,000
Dept. Y: (55 men days × ` 1,200) 66,000
Opportunity Cost of Contribution Lost by 1,98,000 2,99,000
Dept. Y (`66,000 × `3)
Variable Overheads [30%×(`35,000+` 66,000)] 30,300
Delivery Costs 15,500
Additional Supervisory required for 80,000
modification
Saving Due to Alternative Use of AI Device
Working Note
(`)
Loss on Material Cost Saving of Machine 2,00,000
Less: Conversion Cost (5 men days × `1,000) 5,000
Less: Variable Cost (30% × `5,000) 1,500
Net Loss on Material Cost Saving of Machine 1,93,500
expenses are less than the estimate. This creates the problem
of treatment of such under or over-recovery of overheads.
Marginal costing avoids such under or over recovery of
overheads.
3. Shows Realistic Profit: Advocates of marginal costing
argues that under the marginal costing technique, the stock
of finished goods and work-in-progress are carried on
marginal cost basis and the fixed expenses are written off to
profit and loss account as period cost. This shows the true
profit of the period.
4. How much to produce: Marginal costing helps in the
preparation of break-even analysis which shows the effect of
increasing or decreasing production activity on the
profitability of the company.
5. More control over expenditure: Segregation of expenses as
fixed and variable helps the management to exercise control
over expenditure. The management can compare the actual
variable expenses with the budgeted variable expenses and
take corrective action through analysis of variances.
6. Helps in Decision Making: Marginal costing helps the
management in taking a number of business decisions like
make or buy, discontinuance of a particular product,
replacement of machines, etc.
7. Short term profit planning: It helps in short term profit
planning by B.E.P charts.
(b) Items included in Financial Accounts only-
(A) Purely Financial Expenses:
(i) Interest on loans or bank mortgages
(ii) Expenses and discounts on issue of shares, debentures
etc.
(iii) Other capital losses i.e., loss by fire not covered by
insurance etc.
The labor cost per unit decreased from `140.42 to `122.67 with the switch to the output-based system, which also increased productivity from 120 to 135 units per week. The productivity gain indicates a positive impact on worker output in the amended system .
The time-based payment system led to workers becoming lazy and producing lower than expected outputs as they opted for night shifts to maximize earnings, which prompted the company to switch to an output-based payment system .
The 25% markup allows Mr. Rishi to reflect internal profits within the production chain, helping identify the profitability of each stage. This aids in financial analysis and decision-making by providing a clearer view of profit margins beyond cost, aligning inter-departmental goals .
Mr. Rishi transfers the output of Processes I and II to the next process at cost plus 25% and the output of Process III at cost plus 33 1/3%. This approach allows him to evaluate the profit made at each stage of the production process .
Despite lower sales, Product 'C' should not be discontinued as it is still profitable at a 7.13% profit margin on sales. Discontinuing it based solely on sales volume without considering profitability would be a flawed decision .
The correct pricing for these items as determined by management is based on marginal cost plus allocated fixed overhead cost, resulting in bag at 118.5, bottle at 93.875, and geometry at 49.25 .
A detailed analysis of the fixed and variable costs in products A, B, and C highlights inefficient cost allocation, particularly in administrative wages for Product C. A strategy focusing on reducing fixed costs in Product C while maintaining its sales could improve profitability across the product line .
The incorrect wage rate selection led to an excess payment of `1,500, while using the Rowan scheme would have mitigated this by reducing the loss to `1,468.18, saving `31.82 overall .
The transfer price value at which the output of Process I is transferred to Process II in Mr. Rishi's business model is `1,97,95,000 .
The cost value of closing stock in Process III, including overhead allocations and transfer pricing, is calculated to be `20,86,500 .