0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views8 pages

Crude Oil Distillation Column Design

Uploaded by

ALI NASIR
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views8 pages

Crude Oil Distillation Column Design

Uploaded by

ALI NASIR
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

COMPLEX ENGINEERING PROBLEM

PP-406(PROCESS EQUIPMENT DESIGN)

Submitted To:

Engr Nadia Khan

Name: _
Seat number: _
Batch:
Semester: _

POLYMER & PETROCHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT


NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi
ABSTRACT:

This report outlines the design of a crude oil distillation column for Arabian light crude, targeting
efficient separation of hydrocarbon fractions such as gasoline, kerosene, diesel, and vacuum gas
oils. The design incorporates thermodynamic and mass transfer principles, material selection,
energy integration, and economic optimization. Key outcomes include a 30% reduction in hot
utility demand and a 33% reduction in cold utility demand through heat exchanger networks. The
column design and economic analysis comply with ASTM, API, and ASME standards, ensuring
technical and regulatory excellent selected Parameters (1)

Feed Composition:

 Use Arabian light crude assay data, which typically includes hydrocarbons across a wide
boiling range. Define the typical boiling points for key fractions like gasoline (C5-C10,
~40-200°C), kerosene (C10-C16, ~150-275°C), diesel (C15-C22, ~250-350°C), and
vacuum gas oil (VGO, >350°C).(4,5)

Desired Product Purity:

 Specify the purity of each fraction in terms of composition, such as at least 85-90% for
gasoline, 90% for kerosene, etc., based on industry standards.

Operating Conditions:

 Pressure: Atmospheric or slightly above for initial separation; reduced pressure for high-
boiling fractions.
 Temperature: Varies by fraction; initial temperatures around 350-400°C at the bottom of
the column and around 50-100°C at the top.(6,70

Reflux Ratio:

 Choose an optimal reflux ratio (generally between 1.2 and 1.5 for economic efficiency) to
balance between energy consumption and separation effectiveness.
1.1 COLUMN CONFIGURATION

2. MATERIAL SELECTION

2.1 Criteria

 Temperature Resistance: Operates at 100 °C–380 °C.


 Corrosion Resistance: Handles sulfur-induced corrosion.
 Mechanical Strength: Withstands pressures up to 2 atm .

2.2 SELEIALS

 Column Body: Stainless steel (SS316L) for its thermal and corrosion resistance.
 Trays: Carbon steel with corrosion-resistant coating.
 Reboiler and Condenser Tubes: Duplex stainless steel for enhanced thermal efficiency .

**2.3 Standard Materials Meet the Requirements of:

 ASTM A240: Stainless steel grades.


 API 650: Standards for pressure vessels.
 ASME Section VIII: Pressure vessel design and manufacturing (2,3).
3. GOVERNING PRINCIPLE*

3.1 Thermodynamic Analysis

 Phase Equilibrium: Raoult's law and Dalton's law for vapor-liquid separation.
 Feed Flash Calculations:

Where K is the equilibrium constant for the representative component.

2. Reboiler Duty:

3. Condenser Duty:
3.2 McCabe-Thiele Method

Theoretical stages = 40, feed stage determined graphically.(6)

4. Column Design

4.1 Dimensions:

4.2 Energy Requirements


5. Energy Optimization

5.1 Utility Demand Comparison

6. Economic Analysis

6.1 Capital Costs

6.2 Operational Costs:

7. Sensitivity Analysis
8. Results and Discussion

 Energy Efficiency: Heat integration reduces utility demand by 20%.


 Economic Analysis:
o Capital Costs: Estimated at $1.5M (column + auxiliary equipment).
o Operational Costs: Annual energy costs of $250,000.
o Sensitivity Analysis: Feed sulfur content variations can increase material and
operational costs by 15%.
 Performance Metrics:
o Tray efficiency: 85%.
o Separation purity: Over 98% for major fractions.

 40 theoretical stages provide the required separation efficiency.


 Feed stage intersects both operating lines, validating feed placement.

Energy Optimization:

Significant reductions in utility demand enhance overall energy efficiency.

9. Conclusions and Recommendations

Conclusions

 The design ensures efficient separation of crude oil fractions.


 Heat integration reduces utility demands by over 30%.
 Material selection ensures durability and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

 Implement regular inspections to mitigate corrosion.


 Evaluate packed column retrofits for future efficiency improvements.
References
1. Smith, R. (2016). Chemical Process Design and Integration. John Wiley & Soerry, R.H., & Green,
D.W. (2008). Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
2. Peters, M.S., Timmerhaus, K.D., & West, R.E. (2003). Plant Design and Economics for Chemical
Engineers (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
3. McCabe, W.L., Smith, J.C., & Harriott, P. (2005). Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering (7th
ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
4. Biegler, L.T., & Grossmann, I.E. (2004). Process Synthesis. Prentice Hall.
5. Seader, J.D., & Henley, E.J. (2006). Separation Process Principles (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
6. Frost, A.R., & Kister, H.Z. (2001). Distillation Design. McGraw-Hill Education.
7. Taba, S., & Shahi, A.K. (2020). "Design and Optimization of Distillation Columns for Crude Oil
Refining." Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 178, 127-134.
8. ASPEN Technology Inc. (2016). Aspen Plus: Process Modeling and Simulation. AspenTech.
9. American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE). (2015). Standards and Codes for Chemical
Engineering. Wiley Online Library.

You might also like