0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views12 pages

Comparing Forecasting Methods: MA vs. ES

Uploaded by

papawiboe
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views12 pages

Comparing Forecasting Methods: MA vs. ES

Uploaded by

papawiboe
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

12/28/2024 Columbia University 01:08:23

[Link]
Level Model
Compare Moving Average and Exponential Smoothing.
Moving Exponetial

Average Smoothing

N=5

Average error 0.50 0.2

MAD 6.9 7.3

MSE 74.1 82.4

MAPE 6.9% 7.3%

MOVING AVERAGES

forecast forecast absolute relative forecast

time series MA(5) errors errors errors ES(.33)

1 81.69 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

2 109.97 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3 109.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

4 106.42 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

5 101.82 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6 94.93 101.9 6.9 6.9 7.3% 101.9

7 88.51 104.5 16.0 16.0 18.1% 99.6

8 116.64 100.2 -16.4 16.4 14.1% 95.9

9 86.24 101.7 15.4 15.4 17.9% 102.8

10 117.10 97.6 -19.5 19.5 16.6% 97.3

11 105.58 100.7 -4.9 4.9 4.6% 103.9

12 94.60 102.8 8.2 8.2 8.7% 104.5

13 102.87 104.0 1.2 1.2 1.1% 101.2

14 88.18 101.3 13.1 13.1 14.9% 101.7

15 106.23 101.7 -4.6 4.6 4.3% 97.2

12 Prof. Guillermo Gallego [Link]


12/28/2024 Columbia University 01:08:23

16 98.71 99.5 0.8 0.8 0.8% 100.2

17 93.55 98.1 4.6 4.6 4.9% 99.7

18 101.19 97.9 -3.3 3.3 3.2% 97.7

19 93.22 97.6 4.4 4.4 4.7% 98.8

20 107.41 98.6 -8.8 8.8 8.2% 97.0

21 110.87 98.8 -12.1 12.1 10.9% 100.4

22 100.41 101.3 0.8 0.8 0.8% 103.9

23 102.05 102.6 0.6 0.6 0.6% 102.8

24 96.49 102.8 6.3 6.3 6.5% 102.5

25 97.43 103.4 6.0 6.0 6.2% 100.5

26 105.94 101.5 -4.5 4.5 4.2% 99.5

27 92.42 100.5 8.0 8.0 8.7% 101.6

28 99.44 98.9 -0.6 0.6 0.6% 98.6

29 97.70 98.3 0.6 0.6 0.7% 98.9

30 90.40 98.6 8.2 8.2 9.1% 98.5

31 109.89 97.2 -12.7 12.7 11.6% 95.8

32 104.04 98.0 -6.1 6.1 5.8% 100.5

33 91.46 100.3 8.8 8.8 9.7% 101.7

34 103.98 98.7 -5.3 5.3 5.1% 98.3

35 96.59 100.0 3.4 3.4 3.5% 100.2

36 100.31 101.2 0.9 0.9 0.9% 99.0

12 Prof. Guillermo Gallego [Link]


12/28/2024 Columbia University 01:08:23

alpha 0.33
EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING

forecast absolute relative

errors errors errors

#N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A

6.9 6.9 7.3%

11.1 11.1 12.5%

-20.8 20.8 17.8%

16.6 16.6 19.2%

-19.8 19.8 16.9%

-1.7 1.7 1.6%

9.9 9.9 10.4%

-1.7 1.7 1.7%

13.6 13.6 15.4%

-9.0 9.0 8.5%

12 Prof. Guillermo Gallego [Link]


12/28/2024 Columbia University 01:08:23

1.5 1.5 1.5%

6.2 6.2 6.6%

-3.5 3.5 3.5%

5.6 5.6 6.0%

-10.4 10.4 9.7%

-10.4 10.4 9.4%

3.5 3.5 3.5%

0.7 0.7 0.7%

6.0 6.0 6.2%

3.1 3.1 3.2%

-6.5 6.5 6.1%

9.2 9.2 10.0%

-0.9 0.9 0.9%

1.2 1.2 1.2%

8.1 8.1 8.9%

-14.1 14.1 12.8%

-3.6 3.6 3.4%

10.2 10.2 11.2%

-5.7 5.7 5.5%

3.6 3.6 3.7%

-1.3 1.3 1.3%

12 Prof. Guillermo Gallego [Link]


[Link]
Linear trend. Here we compare moving averages, exponential smoothing,
and double exponential smoothing. Expost regression is an after the fact benchmark.
Moving Exponetial Double Exp. Expost

Average Smoothing Smoothing Regression

N=5

Average error -7.11 -7.51 -3.71 -1.13

MAD 10.85 10.48 9.13 8.10

MSE 163.20 158.91 136.00 86.77

MAPE 7.16% 6.96% 6.35% 6.00%

MOVING AVERAGES

series forecast forecast absolute

time series trend +trend MA(5) errors errors

1 83.8 0.0 83.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A

2 88.8 3.0 91.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A

3 104.7 6.0 110.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A

4 104.5 9.0 113.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A

5 93.8 12.0 105.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A

6 108.2 15.0 123.2 101.1 -22.1 22.1

7 106.5 18.0 124.5 109.0 -15.5 15.5

8 98.6 21.0 119.6 115.5 -4.0 4.0

9 110.3 24.0 134.3 117.3 -17.0 17.0

10 90.9 27.0 117.9 121.5 3.5 3.5

11 109.4 30.0 139.4 123.9 -15.5 15.5

12 101.5 33.0 134.5 127.1 -7.3 7.3

13 81.9 36.0 117.9 129.1 11.2 11.2

14 86.6 39.0 125.6 128.8 3.2 3.2

15 99.4 42.0 141.4 127.1 -14.3 14.3


16 89.9 45.0 134.9 131.7 -3.1 3.1

17 104.4 48.0 152.4 130.8 -21.6 21.6

18 107.0 51.0 158.0 134.4 -23.5 23.5

19 91.6 54.0 145.6 142.4 -3.1 3.1

20 99.6 57.0 156.6 146.4 -10.1 10.1

21 89.3 60.0 149.3 149.5 0.1 0.1

22 88.0 63.0 151.0 152.4 1.4 1.4

23 97.2 66.0 163.2 152.1 -11.2 11.2

24 95.3 69.0 164.3 153.1 -11.2 11.2

25 106.6 70.0 176.6 156.9 -19.7 19.7

26 111.3 71.0 182.3 160.9 -21.4 21.4

27 104.7 72.0 176.7 167.5 -9.2 9.2

28 80.6 73.0 153.6 172.6 19.0 19.0

29 90.9 74.0 164.9 170.7 5.8 5.8

30 87.2 75.0 162.2 170.8 8.6 8.6

31 108.0 76.0 184.0 167.9 -16.1 16.1

32 86.3 77.0 163.3 168.3 5.0 5.0

33 100.6 78.0 178.6 165.6 -13.0 13.0

34 99.8 79.0 178.8 170.6 -8.2 8.2

35 97.9 80.0 177.9 173.4 -4.5 4.5

36 102.3 81.0 183.3 176.5 -6.8 6.8


ial smoothing,
after the fact benchmark.

alpha 0.33 alpha 0.33


EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING DOUBLE EXPONENTIAL SMO

relative forecast forecast absolute relative forecast smoothing

errors ES(.33) errors errors errors of data

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 83.8

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 91.8

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 99.78 103.4

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 111.96 112.5

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 121.11 116.1

17.9% 101.14 -22.1 22.1 17.9% 123.88 123.7

12.4% 108.42 -16.1 16.1 12.9% 131.43 129.1

3.4% 113.73 -5.8 5.8 4.9% 136.55 130.9

12.6% 115.65 -18.6 18.6 13.9% 137.42 136.4

3.0% 121.79 3.9 3.9 3.3% 142.69 134.5

11.1% 120.52 -18.9 18.9 13.6% 139.48 139.5

5.4% 126.75 -7.7 7.7 5.7% 144.42 141.1

9.5% 129.30 11.4 11.4 9.6% 145.55 136.4

2.6% 125.55 0.0 0.0 0.0% 139.36 134.8

10.1% 125.55 -15.8 15.8 11.2% 136.98 138.4


2.3% 130.77 -4.1 4.1 3.0% 140.83 138.9

14.1% 132.12 -20.3 20.3 13.3% 140.95 144.7

14.9% 138.81 -19.2 19.2 12.1% 147.44 150.9

2.1% 145.13 -0.4 0.4 0.3% 154.19 151.3

6.5% 145.27 -11.3 11.3 7.2% 154.15 154.9

0.1% 149.00 -0.3 0.3 0.2% 157.88 155.1

0.9% 149.10 -1.9 1.9 1.2% 157.53 155.4

6.8% 149.73 -13.5 13.5 8.3% 157.49 159.4

6.8% 154.19 -10.1 10.1 6.2% 161.82 162.7

11.2% 157.53 -19.1 19.1 10.8% 165.2 169.0

11.8% 163.83 -18.5 18.5 10.1% 172.2 175.5

5.2% 169.93 -6.7 6.7 3.8% 179.3 178.4

12.4% 172.16 18.6 18.6 12.1% 182.0 172.6

3.5% 166.03 1.1 1.1 0.7% 174.7 171.5

5.3% 165.66 3.4 3.4 2.1% 173.0 169.4

8.7% 164.52 -19.5 19.5 10.6% 170.4 174.9

3.1% 170.96 7.7 7.7 4.7% 176.6 172.2

7.3% 168.42 -10.2 10.2 5.7% 173.1 174.9

4.6% 171.78 -7.0 7.0 3.9% 176.2 177.1

2.6% 174.10 -3.8 3.8 2.2% 178.5 178.3

3.7% 175.37 -7.9 7.9 4.3% 179.7 180.9


SUMMARY OUT

Regression Statistic
Multiple
R Square
Adjusted
Standard
Observat

beta 0.16 ANOVA


OUBLE EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING REGRESSION

smoothing forecast absolute relative expost forecastabsolutrelative Regressi


of trend errors errors errors forecast error errors errors Residual
103.3 19.5 19.5 23% Total
8.0 105.8 13.9 13.9 15%

8.6 11.0 11.0 0.1 108.2 -2.6 2.6 2% Coefficien


8.6 1.5 1.5 1% 110.6 -2.9 2.9 3% Intercept
7.8 -15.3 15.3 14% 113.0 7.2 7.2 7% X Variabl
7.8 -0.7 0.7 1% 115.4 -7.8 7.8 6%

7.4 -6.9 6.9 6% 117.8 -6.7 6.7 5%

6.5 -17.0 17.0 14% 120.2 0.7 0.7 1%

6.3 -3.2 3.2 2% 122.7 -11.6 11.6 9%

5.0 -24.8 24.8 21% 125.1 7.1 7.1 6%

5.0 -0.1 0.1 0% 127.5 -11.9 11.9 9%

4.4 -10.0 10.0 7% 129.9 -4.6 4.6 3%

2.9 -27.6 27.6 23% 132.3 14.4 14.4 12%

2.2 -13.8 13.8 11% 134.7 9.2 9.2 7%

2.4 4.4 4.4 3% 137.1 -4.2 4.2 3%


2.1 -6.0 6.0 4% 139.6 4.7 4.7 3%

2.7 11.4 11.4 8% 142.0 -10.4 10.4 7%

3.3 10.5 10.5 7% 144.4 -13.6 13.6 9%

2.8 -8.6 8.6 6% 146.8 1.2 1.2 1%

2.9 2.4 2.4 2% 149.2 -7.3 7.3 5%

2.5 -8.6 8.6 6% 151.6 2.3 2.3 2%

2.1 -6.5 6.5 4% 154.0 3.1 3.1 2%

2.4 5.8 5.8 4% 156.5 -6.8 6.8 4%

2.6 2.5 2.5 2% 158.9 -5.5 5.5 3%

3.2 11.4 11.4 6% 161.3 -15.3 15.3 9%

3.7 10.2 10.2 6% 163.7 -18.6 18.6 10%

3.6 -2.6 2.6 1% 166.1 -10.6 10.6 6%

2.1 -28.4 28.4 18% 168.5 14.9 14.9 10%

1.5 -9.8 9.8 6% 170.9 6.0 6.0 4%

0.9 -10.8 10.8 7% 173.4 11.1 11.1 7%

1.7 13.6 13.6 7% 175.8 -8.2 8.2 4%

1.0 -13.3 13.3 8% 178.2 14.9 14.9 9%

1.3 5.5 5.5 3% 180.6 2.0 2.0 1%

1.4 2.6 2.6 1% 183.0 4.2 4.2 2%

1.4 -0.5 0.5 0% 185.4 7.5 7.5 4%

1.6 3.6 3.6 2% 187.8 4.6 4.6 2%


SUMMARY OUTPUT

egression Statistics
0.93369
0.87177
0.868
9.89803
36

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
1 22646.535 22646.535 231.1555 9.924E-17
34 3331.0139 97.970998
35 25977.549

Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%
100.927 3.3693019 29.954944 5.026E-26 94.080009 107.77449 94.080009
2.41438 0.158801 15.203799 9.924E-17 2.0916563 2.7371008 2.0916563
Upper 95.0%
107.77449
2.7371008

You might also like