0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views6 pages

Investment Project Evaluation Exercises

Uploaded by

dat.l.set21
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views6 pages

Investment Project Evaluation Exercises

Uploaded by

dat.l.set21
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Exercise 1:

Company A plans to invest to expand production scale after considering projects A and B,
the expected income streams of the two projects are as follows (unit in million VND)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Project A 130 70 150 274 420
Project B 30 106 220 336 424
Based on NPV spending, which option do you recommend the company choose?
Knowing that the initial investment cost of project A is 150 million VND, project B is 600
million VND, and the capital cost of the two projects is 8%, calculating the total investment
capital, the salvage value is zero.
Exercise 2:
The initial investment capital for 1 hectare is 90 million VND, annual cost is 40 million
VND. The 3rd - 6th year yields an average yield of 2,500 kg/ha. From the 7th year onwards,
the yield reaches 6,000 kg/ha and the harvest is stable for up to 15 years, with a capital cost
of 5%. In your opinion, should we invest in this project or not (according to NPV, NFV,
NAV methods) with an average lychee price of 15,000 VND/kg.
Exercise 3:
The company is considering a 4-year project. Related information: initial investment
capital is 10 billion. At the beginning of year 2, working capital must be supplemented by
0.5 billion. This working capital amount will be recovered in the final year of the project.
During each year from year 1 to year 4, the project will generate a cash flow of 2
billion/year. Should the company undertake the project? Give i = 10%.
Exercise 4:
a. Use the present value NPV or future value NFV or NAV criteria to choose an option
b. Additional investment capital to calculate option selection
Year Option 1 Option 2
Initial investment 0 90 90
Income 1 40 40
Income 2 40 30
Income 3 20 40
Income 4 30 20
Income 5 20 10
Salvage value 5 3 3
Rate of Return 10% 10%
Additional investment 3 20 30
capital (question 1 b)

Exercise 5:
A business is considering two investment options as follows:
Unit: million VND
Option A Option B
Total initial investment capital 640 980
Operating time 4 year 6 year
Salvage value 0 50
Annual income 570 570
Know:
- Option A: The total annual cost of option A is 310 million VND.
- Option B: The cost for the first 2 years is only 200 million VND and 240 million VND
for the last 4 years.
With i = 15%, which investment option should the business choose?
a. Calculated according to NAV
b. Calculated according to the least common multiple of the operating time of the two
options.
Exercise 6
A sports equipment factory is considering two options to produce a new product with the
following characteristics:
Unit: million VND
Option A Option B
Total initial investment capital 1000 1700
Economic life 6 year 12 year
Salvage value 150 100
Annual income 900 900

The total annual cost of option A is 600 million VND in the first 3 years and 700 million
VND in the last 3 years. The total annual cost of option B is 600 million VND.
With i = 12%, should the business produce this product or not, and if so, which option
should it choose? Solve the problem in 2 ways:
a) Calculated according to NAV
b) Calculated according to the least common multiple of the operating time of the two
options.
Exercise 7
A business wants to open an additional product showroom, there are 2 options for choosing
a location as follows:
Unit: million VND
Location X Location Y
Total initial investment capital 950 840
Contract period 15 year 10 year
Salvage value 510 600
Annual cost 880 1000
Annual income 1.230 1.370
Assuming the initial investment capital is loan capital with an interest rate of i = 15%,
which location should the business choose? Solve the problem in 2 ways:
a) Calculated according to NAV
b) Calculated according to the least common multiple of the operating time of the two
options.
Exercise 8
A factory planning to invest in a steel rolling line has two suppliers offering prices as
follows:
Type X: has an initial value of 640 million VND, after 4 years of use it will have no salvage
value, the annual operating and maintenance cost is 330 million VND, bringing in an
average annual income of 590 million VND.
Type Y: Has an initial value of 980 million VND, after 6 years of use the salvage value is
50 million VND. This type still yields an average annual income of 590 million VND, but
the operating cost for the first 2 years is 220 million VND and for the last 4 years is 260
million VND.
With i = 15% per year. Which type should the factory invest in?
a) Calculated by NAV
b) Calculated by the least common multiple of the operating times of the 2 options?
Exercise 9:
Investment projects with data as shown in the following table. Calculate the IRR and
evaluate the project
Data
Initial investment capital 100
Annual income 55
Annual cost 25
Interest rate 12%
Project lifespan 5

Exercise 10:
A project has a total investment capital at the start of production of 350 billion VND. The
projected annual revenue of the project is 115 billion VND, the annual operating cost
(excluding depreciation and interest) is 25 billion VND, the project's lifespan is 15 years,
and the salvage value at the end of the project's life is 2 billion. The discount rate of the
project is 15% per year.
Calculate:
a. NPV of the project?
b. Payback time (T)
c. IRR of the project?
Exercise 11:
A project has a total investment capital at the start of production of 3,500 million VND.
The revenue in the first year of the project is 500 million VND, and in the second year, it
is 550 million VND, from the third year onwards the project's revenue is expected to
stabilize at 950 million VND annually until the end of the project's life. The annual
operating cost (excluding depreciation and interest) of the project is 150 million VND.
The project's lifespan is 15 years. The salvage value at the end of the project's life is 10
million VND. The discount rate of the project is 16% per year.
Questions:
a. Should the project be invested in or not?
b. What is the maximum acceptable interest rate for borrowing capital?
Exercise 12:
A company is considering an investment project to improve the quality of its products.
The total investment capital for the project is 17,000 million VND and is sourced from
three different channels:
Source 1: Borrowing 10,500 million VND - term of 5 years - interest rate of 12% per
annum
Source 2: Borrowing 5,500 million VND - term of 5 years - interest rate of 14% per
annum
Source 3: Borrowing 1,000 million VND - term of 5 years - interest rate of 16% per
annum
If the project is implemented, the projected annual revenue is 6,500 million VND. The
estimated costs (excluding depreciation and interest payments) for the first year are 2,900
million VND, for the second year are 3,100 million VND, and then stabilize at 3,300
million VND. If the project's lifespan is 15 years with a maintenance overhaul every 5
years, costing 200 million VND each time.
Questions:
1. What is the NPV of the project?
2. What is the maximum acceptable interest rate for the project?
Exercise 13:
To ensure irrigation for agricultural production in commune A, it is planned to invest in
the construction of an irrigation system with the following costs: Initial cost is 12 billion
VND, annual maintenance cost is 140 million VND (excluding depreciation and interest
on borrowed capital). The lifespan of the construction is 30 years, with major repairs
needed every 15 years costing 500 million VND each time. Due to the construction, the
annual income from farming of local farmers increases by 1.4 billion VND. The interest
rate for borrowing capital to build the construction is 8% per year. Please calculate the
basic indicators (NPV, IRR, and T) to evaluate the financial efficiency of the project.
Exercise 14:
To welcome tourists to Quang Ninh Province annually, the Provincial People's
Committee of Quang Ninh has decided to implement the project "Renovation and
construction of a new tourist and entertainment area." The project is developed with the
following costs and revenues:
Estimated compensation and resettlement costs are around 20 million USD, construction
and equipment costs are approximately 60 million USD, and other investment costs are
about 12 million USD.
Annual expected revenue is around 50 million USD. The annual cost to maintain this
revenue is estimated to be 60% of the revenue (excluding depreciation and interest
expenses).
The project requires periodic repairs every 15 years, costing 10 million USD each time.
The business plan for the project spans 30 years. After cessation of operations, the
salvage value is estimated to be 20 million USD. The market interest rate is 12% per
year.
Please calculate the financial performance indicators of the project.
Exercise 15:
A hotel construction investment project has a total investment capital calculated at the
start of the project's operation of 40 billion VND. Of this, self-capital is 20 billion VND
with an opportunity cost of capital of 18% per annum, and borrowed capital is 20 billion
VND with an interest rate of 12% per annum. The projected annual revenue of the project
is estimated at 24 billion VND. The annual costs (excluding depreciation) are 40% of the
revenue. After the project ceases operation, the salvage value is 2.5 billion VND. The
project's lifespan is 30 years. Calculate:
1. The net present value (NPV) of the project's lifetime net income.
2. The payback time (T) of the project's initial investment.

Common questions

Powered by AI

To analyze the investment decision for the hotel, calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) using a discounted cash flow analysis, and determine the payback time for the initial investment. The initial investment is 40 billion VND (20 billion self-financed and 20 billion borrowed), with an opportunity cost of capital at 18% and interest rate of borrowed capital at 12% per annum.Projected annual revenue is 24 billion VND, with annual costs amounting to 40% of revenue. The present value of net cash flows must be calculated using the 18% opportunity cost to determine NPV. For payback time, assess how long it takes for cumulative cash flows to equal initial investment.NPV and payback time give insights into the viability and risk of recovering the investment. A positive NPV and a shorter payback time indicate a more favorable investment .

The project for improving product quality involves a 17,000 million VND investment from three borrowing sources with different interest rates: 12% for 10,500 million VND, 14% for 5,500 million VND, and 16% for 1,000 million VND. The project estimates annual revenues of 6,500 million VND, with annual costs varying across the lifespan.The impact of borrowing costs diversely affects financing and evaluation strategies. Calculate each loan's impact on total capital cost and overall project profitability by determining the combined effective interest rate. The mutual impacts of these diverse rates directly reflect in the project's NPV and IRR, affecting financial performance and the maximum acceptable interest rate. Higher effective costs reduce profitability margins.It's crucial to balance investments against anticipated revenue streams to secure net positive financial performance, adjusting plans as necessary .

The hotel project involves 40 billion VND with 20 billion from self-capital at 18% opportunity cost and 20 billion borrowed at 12% interest. Annual projected revenue is 24 billion, with costs at 40% of revenues. After 30 years, a 2.5 billion VND salvage value is expected, demanding comprehensive financial scrutinity. Calculate NPV using the mixed rate for self and borrowed funds, discounting revenue and net income to present value across years. Estimate the payback time based on cumulative cash flows matching initial outlay.The financial configuration affects project costs, overall debt service, and returns. A strategic blend will optimize capital utilization, balancing risk and profitability over the lifespan .

To decide between Project A and Project B, Company A needs to calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) of each project. The NPV is calculated by discounting the future cash flows of each project at the cost of capital, 8%, and subtracting the initial investment cost. Calculate the NPV as follows:Project A: Initial Investment = 150 million VND, with cash flows of 130, 70, 150, 274, 420 million VND. Using the NPV formula, NPV = -150 + (130/1.08) + (70/1.08^2) + (150/1.08^3) + (274/1.08^4) + (420/1.08^5) = 604.83 million VND.Project B: Initial Investment = 600 million VND, with cash flows of 30, 106, 220, 336, 424 million VND. Using the NPV formula, NPV = -600 + (30/1.08) + (106/1.08^2) + (220/1.08^3) + (336/1.08^4) + (424/1.08^5) = 281.64 million VND.Since Project A has a higher NPV of 604.83 million VND compared to Project B’s 281.64 million VND, Company A should choose Project A .

To choose between location X and location Y, perform a financial analysis using Net Annual Value (NAV) and the least common multiple of the operating time. For NAV, calculate the net cash flow for each year by subtracting annual costs from annual incomes, discount these cash flows at a 15% interest rate, and convert them into annual equivalents over the entire contract period.Location X: Initial capital is 950 million VND, contract period is 15 years, annual cost is 880 million VND, and annual income is 1,230 million VND.Location Y: Initial capital is 840 million VND, contract period is 10 years, annual cost is 1,000 million VND, and annual income is 1,370 million VND.Calculate the NAV by subtracting the discounted annual expenses from the discounted annual income for each location. The location with the higher NAV is the financially better choice. The least common multiple method allows a comparison on a common period basis, ensuring consistent financial metric assessments .

The factory must consider both Net Annual Value (NAV) and a comparison over a common timeframe using the least common multiple method. For Type X, an initial investment of 640 million VND has no salvage value after 4 years and an annual operating cost of 330 million VND, with an annual income of 590 million VND. For Type Y, the initial investment is 980 million VND with a 50 million VND salvage value after 6 years, a variable operating cost (220 million for first 2 years, 260 million for the next 4 years), but similar annual income of 590 million VND.With an interest rate of 15%, calculate NAV for both investment types by discounting the annual values to present net value and converting to an annual equivalent. Use the least common multiple method to compare both options over an aligned period of analysis. Consider the inherent risks, operational efficiency, and potential returns. The option with the highest NAV or comparable metric is preferable, taking risk factors and operational lifespans into account .

The proposed tourist area development project requires calculating NPV, IRR, and evaluating the business plan over 30 years. Initial costs include compensation, construction, and equipment totaling 92 million, with expected annual revenue of 50 million USD and costs as 60% of revenues.Examine financials: Calculating NPV involves discounting net cash inflows and subtracting initial investments using a 12% market rate. IRR defines the discount rate making NPV zero; a higher IRR than cost indicates viability.Consider periodic repair costs of 10 million USD every 15 years, salvage at project end at 20 million USD. These elements converging through performance indicators validate financial sustainability, informing approvals based on fiscal feasibility .

The choice between Option A and Option B should be based on calculations of Net Present Value (NPV) or Net Annual Value (NAV). For NPV, you discount the net cash flows at a 12% cost of capital and compare the present values of both options over their economic life.Option A: Initial investment is 1000 million VND, economic life is 6 years, annual income is 900 million VND, annual cost is 600 million VND for the first 3 years, and 700 million VND thereafter, with a salvage value of 150 million VND.Option B: Initial investment is 1700 million VND, economic life is 12 years, annual income is 900 million VND, with a constant annual cost of 600 million VND, and a salvage value of 100 million VND.Perform NPV calculations for each option and compare them. The option with the higher NPV is preferable. NAV can also be used to equalize the consideration period by calculating an equivalent annualized value of the NPVs to make a decision .

For the irrigation system with an initial 12 billion VND cost, annual maintenance at 140 million, and increased farmer income of 1.4 billion VND per year, evaluate financial efficiency using NPV, IRR, and payback time. The project’s lifespan is 30 years with a major 500 million repairs every 15 years at 8% interest rate.Calculate NPV by discounting future net cash inflows (increased income minus costs) and repair costs to present values, then subtract the initial investment. A positive NPV indicates feasibility.IRR reflects the discount rate whereby NPV becomes zero; higher IRR than the cost of capital suggests viable returns.Payback time is when cumulative net inflows equal initial investment, providing timeframes for capital recovery. Such indicators assess financial sustainability, guiding investment decisions .

To evaluate the lychee farming project, use NPV (Net Present Value), NFV (Net Future Value), and NAV (Net Annual Value). Initial investment is 90 million VND/ha, with annual costs of 40 million VND. From year 3-6, yield is 2,500 kg/ha, increasing to 6,000 kg/ha from year 7 onwards, with a lychee price of 15,000 VND/kg and a capital cost of 5%.Calculate the cash inflows and compare them to the costs throughout the project's lifespan up to year 15. For NPV, discount future cash flows using capital cost, identifying the surplus. NFV calculates future values of cash flows. NAV standardizes cash flows on an annual basis over the project's years.A positive NPV, adequate NAV, and NFV indicate a profitable project. Discrepancies suggest potential risks or inefficiencies in capital allocation .

You might also like