Psychological Assessment Tools Overview
Psychological Assessment Tools Overview
Reliability
Internal consistency for the BDI ranges from .73 to .92 with a mean of .86. The BDI
demonstrates high internal consistency, with alpha coefficients of .86 and .81 for psychiatric
and non-psychiatric populations, respectively
Split-half / Cronbach’s Alpha: The BDI has a split-half reliability co-efficient of .93.
Test-Retest Reliability: re-test reliabilities ranged from .48 to .86, depending on the interval
between re-testing and type of population.
Alternate Form Reliability: Correlation’s between the 21 item and 13-item short form have
ranged from .89 to .97 indicating that the short form is an acceptable substitute for the long
form
Concurrent validity: Correlations with clinician ratings of depression using the revised BDI
range from .62 to .66. Clinical ratings for Psychiatric patients are reported as high to
moderate ranging from .55 to .96 Man r=.72 reported moderate correlations between the
revised BDI and other scales measuring depression such as the Hamilton Psychiatric Rating
Scale for Depression (.73) and the Zung Self Reported Depression Scale (.76) and the MMPI
Depression Scale (.76).
Scoring- Add up the score for each of the twenty-one questions and obtain the total. The
highest score on each of the twenty-one questions is three; the highest possible total for the
whole test is sixty-three. The lowest possible score for the whole test is zero. Only add one
score per question (the highest rated if more than one is circled)
Norms
05 - 09 These ups and downs are considered normal
10 - 18 Mild to moderate depression
19 - 29 Moderate to severe depression
30 - 63 Severe depression
Below 4 = Possible denial of depression, faking good; this is below usual scores for normal.
Over 40 = This is significantly above even severely depressed persons, suggesting possible
exaggeration of depression; possibly characteristic of histrionic or borderline personality
disorders. Significant levels of depression are still possible.
Instructions
Read through the 4 or 5 statements listed below and circle number of the statement that
reflects your feelings most correctly. Choose only ONE of the alternatives under each
heading.
1. Mood
0 – I do not feel sad
1 – I feel blue or sad
2a – I am blue or sad all the time and I cannot snap about it
2b – I am so sad and unhappy that it is very painful
3 – I am so sad or unhappy that I can’t stand it
2. Pessimism
0 – I am not particular pessimistic or discharged about the future
1 – I feel discouraged about the future
2a – I feel I have nothing to look forward to
2b – I feel I won’t ever get over my troubles
3 – I feel that future is hopeless and that things cannot improve
3. Sense of Failure
0 – I do not feel like a failure
1- I feel I have failed more than an average person
2a – I feel I have accomplished very little that is worthwhile or that means nothing
2b – as I look back on my life all I can see is lot of failure
3- I feel I am a complete failure as a person
4. Lack of Satisfaction
0 – I am not particularly dissatisfied
1a – I feel bored most of the time
1b – I don’t enjoy the thing the way I used to
2 – I don’t get satisfaction out of anything anymore
3 – I am dissatisfied with everything
5. Guilty Feeling
0 – I don’t feel particularly guilty
1- I feel bad or unworthy a good part of the time
2a – I feel quite guilty
2b- I feel bad or unworthy I practically all the time
3 – I feel as though I am very bad or worthless
6. Sense of Punishment
0 – I don’t feel I am being punished.
1 – I have a feeling that something bad will happen to me
2 – I feel I am being punished or will be punished.
3a – I feel deserve to be punished
3b – I want to be punished.
7. Self – Hate
0 – I don’t feel disappointed in myself
1a – I am disappointed in myself
1b – I don’t like myself
2- I am disgusted with myself
3 – I hate myself
8. Self accusation
0 – I don’t feel I am worse than anybody else
1 – I am very critical of myself for any weakness or mistake
2a – I blame myself for everything that goes wrong
2b – I feel I have many bad faults
11. Irritability
0 – I am no more irritated now than I ever was
1 – I get annoyed or irritated more easily than I used to
2 – I feel irritated all the time
3 – I don’t get irritated at all the things that used to irritate me
13. Indecisiveness
0 – I make decisions about as well as ever
1 – I am less sure of myself now and try to put off making decisions
2 – I can’t decisions any more without a help
3 – I can’t make any decision at al any more
17. Fatigability
0 – I don’t get any more tired than usual
1 – I get tired more usually than I used to
2 – I get tired by doing anything
3 – I get too tired to do anything
2. One day this boy went out with his mother and father and they became angry with him
a) What was it about? - What happened?
b) How did it end?
3. One day his father and mother were angry with each other
a) What made them angry
b) What happened then?
4. This Boy had a friend whom he liked very much. One day he said “you come with me
And I’ll show you something but you mustn’t tell anyone because it is a secret?
a) What did he show him?
b) What did they do?
6. This boy used to tell stories. You Know sometimes they were true and sometimes they
were not?
a) He told the other boy one of histories- what did he tell them?
b) Was it true? Why did he tell it to them?
c) One day he told his mother and father one of his stories- what did he tell them?
d) Was it true? Why did he tell it to them?
9. Before going away the person ( fairy ) said you are growing up. Do you want to grow
up?
a) What did the boy say?
b) If he wanted to grow up- What did he want to do when he grew up?
c) If not- did he want things to stay just as they are for always or did he want something
different. What did he want differently? Why did he want to stay the same?
10. This is the end of the story. Did you like it?
a) What do you like about the boy in the story etc?
b) What do you dislike in him?
c) Is he the same as you? In what way (or in what way is he not?)
The Coping Health Inventory for Parents (CHIP) developed by McCubbin et al. 1981 was
used to assess subjects’ cognitive and behavioural coping strategies (Refer Appendix I). This
instrument has been widely used to measure parental coping in chronic life-threatening
disorders of childhood. Parents were asked to indicate which of the 45 coping strategies
included in the instrument they used and rate the usefulness of each strategy in their
particular family situation. The CHIP consists of the following three subscales: “Coping
Pattern I: Family Integration, cooperation and optimism” containing 19 items, “Coping
Pattern II: Social support, esteem and stability”, containing 18 items, and “Coping Pattern III:
Medical communication and consultation” containing 8 items. If a coping behaviour was not
used, the parent recorded why either by checking “I do not cope this way because I chose not
to use it/ Not possible. Construct validity and criterion validity were established. In addition
Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for internal consistency were established and found to be 0.79,
0.79 and 0.71 for the aforementioned three coping patterns respectively. Because the
reliability score for each scale was computed separately no reliability coefficient for the total
scale was reported. Based on research data obtained from the CHIP, the investigators
developed an “index of normative scores” to be used as means of comparison. Through this
index, health care professionals can identify parents who may not manage the hardships of
having a chronically ill child adequately, as well as areas of family functioning that need to
be enhanced or strengthened. The CHIP was not translated in the regional languages since it
could be gauged that the majority of the participants were either illiterate, or could not read or
write due to lack of opportunities to enhance these skills despite being literate. Hence the
questionnaire was administered to all the participants of the study in the form of an interview.
10 parents consisting of 9 mothers and one father participated in the pilot study held prior to
data collection. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for internal consistency were established
and found to be 0.70, 0.60 and 0.32 for the aforementioned three coping patterns respectively.
The reliability of the total scale was found to 0.70.
Procedure:
The following instructions are given:
• To complete this inventory you are asked to read the list of “Coping Behaviours” below,
one at a time.
• For each coping behaviour you used, please record how helpful it was. HOW HEPLFUL
was this COPING BEHAVIOUR to you and/or your family: Circle ONE number.
3 = Extremely Helpful
2 = Moderately Helpful
1 = Minimally helpful
0 = Not helpful
• For each Coping Behaviour you did not use please record your “Reason”. Please RECORD
this by checking one of the reasons:
• Chose Not to use it
• Not Possible
PLEASE BEGIN: Please read and record your decision for EACH and EVERY Coping
Behaviour listed below.
Scoring:
1. For each item transfer the number circled by the respondent (father or mother) to the circle
in the column marked “For Computer Use Only”. (Ignore the boxes in this column which
have been added to disguise the scales) Disregard the “I do cope this way” column because
these responses are equivalent to “0”.
2. To obtain scale scores add the numbers you have just transferred to the circles separately
for each column and write the total in the two boxes directly below each column. Column 1,
“F” is Coping Pattern I: Maintaining Family Integration, Cooperation and an Optimistic
Definition of the Situation. Column 2, “S” is Coping Pattern II: Maintaining Social Support,
Self esteem and Psychological Stability. Column 3, “M” is Coping Pattern III: Understanding
the medical situation through Communication with other Parents and Consultation with
Medical Staff.
Interpretation of Coping Patterns
There are three ways to examine and interpret the parental coping scores:
A) Treat each parent as an individual and determine whether his or her coping scores fall
within the normal range of responses (within the shaded areas). Certainly, if the score falls
below the normal range this might be a topic for discussion and counselling.
B) Examine parental scores in relationship to each other. Families appear to manage stress
with greater efficiency and ease when parents share the responsibilities by using coping
behaviours in three areas. While parents may emphasize some coping patterns (i.e. be better
at doing certain things) any extreme difference between parent scores may indicate an area of
difficulty for the family unit. This may be an issue in need of further examination and
discussion.
C) Examine the coping scores in relationship to the type and number of demands places on
the family unit. In stressful situation, we would expect the scores to be above the mean or
above the normal. If parental scores are low in the face of increasing demands, this too might
well be a focus for counselling this too might well be a focus for counselling.
Questionnaire I - Coping Health Inventory for Parents (CHIP)
DIRECTIONS:
• To complete this inventory you are asked to read the list of “Coping Behaviours”
below, one at a time.
• For each coping behaviour you used, please record how helpful it was.
HOW HEPLFUL was this COPING BEHAVIOUR to you and/or your family: Circle
ONE number.
3 = Extremely Helpful
2 = Moderately Helpful
1 = Minimally helpful
0 = Not helpful
• For each Coping Behaviour you did Not use please record your “Reason”.
• Not Possible
PLEASE BEGIN: Please read and record your decision for EACH and EVERY Coping
Behaviour listed below.
Your Responses will be kept confidential.
Thank you for your cooperation.
I do not cope this For
Not Helpful
Moderately
way because: computer
Minimally
Extremely
Helpful
Helpful
Helpful
Coping use only
Behaviours Chose
[Link]. Not
not to F S M
possible
use it
Not Helpful
Moderately
computer
Minimally
Extremely
way because:
Helpful
Helpful
Helpful
Coping use only
[Link]. Behaviours Chose
Not
not to F S M
possible
use it
Believing that the medical
16. center/hospital has my family’s 3 2 1 0
best interest in mind.
Building close relationships with
17. 3 2 1 0
people.
18. Believing in God. 3 2 1 0
Not Helpful
Moderately
computer
Minimally
Extremely
way because:
Helpful
Helpful
Helpful
Coping use only
[Link]. Behaviours Chose
Not
not to F S M
possible
use it
Keeping myself in shape and well-
32. 3 2 1 0
groomed.
Involvement in social activities
33. 3 2 1 0
(parties, etc.) with friends.
Going out with my spouse on a
34. 3 2 1 0
regular basis.
Being sure prescribed medical
treatments for child(ren) are
35. 3 2 1 0
carried out at home on a daily
basis.
Building a closer relationship with
36. 3 2 1 0
my spouse.
37. Allowing myself to get angry. 3 2 1 0
38. Investing myself in my children. 3 2 1 0
Talking to someone (not
39. professional counsellor /doctor) 3 2 1 0
about how I feel.
Reading more about the medical
40. 3 2 1 0
problem which concerns me.
Talking over personal feelings and
41. 3 2 1 0
concerns with spouse.
Being able to get away from the
42. home care tasks and responsibilities 3 2 1 0
for some relief.
Having my child with the medical
43. condition seen at the clinic/hospital 3 2 1 0
on a regular basis.
Believing that things will always
44. 3 2 1 0
work out.
MOTHER’S COPING
Integration,
Cooperation,
and Optimism
Support,
Esteem,
and Stability
Medical
Communication
and Consultation
FATHER’S COPING
Integration,
Cooperation,
and Optimism
Support,
Esteem,
and Stability
Medical
Communication
and Consultation
The Emotional Intelligence Inventory (E.I.I)
Reliability of the EII has been established using Cronbach alpha, the coefficient
obtained is 0.88(N=432). The odd-even, Split-Half reliability after correction for attenuation
is found to be 0.86 (N=432).
Validity
A co-efficient of correlation was computed between the ratings and the total score on
the EII. The value obtained was found to be 0.58 which is significant and high. Thus, we can
say that the concurrent validity of the test has also been established. The validity coefficient
found in the same way for ‘personal Efficacy’ was 0.46and for ‘interpersonal Efficacy” and
“Intra personal Efficacy”. The values were 0.39 and 0.46 respectively. All these values are
highly significant, which showed that the total scores and the factor scores have sufficient
validity. In addition to this validity coefficient, the test can claim construct validity on the
basis of the fact scores on EII correlated significantly and positively with creativity. (the
coefficients being 0.58, 0.45, 0.44, and 0.86 for the first 3 factors and the score respectively)
and negatively with general maladjustment (the coefficient being-0.48, -0.42, and -0.73)
Interpretation
Instructions
a) The statements given below are intended to find out how you evaluate yourself about
your spontaneous behavioral pattern.
b) You are requested to mark the extent to which each statement is applicable to you.
c) There are 5 answers as i) fully agree ii) Agree iii) Not sure iv) Disagree v) Fully
disagree.
d) Tick in the appropriate column
e) Answer all the statements.
f) There is no right or wrong answers so rate your opinion as you feel
g) The statements are purely intended for research, the answers will be kept in strict
confidence.
Agree
Agree
Disag
Disag
Fully
Fully
Sure
Not
ree
[Link] Items
1. You can express feelings like happiness,
sadness, anger etc in accordance with the
desired level of situation.
2. You have enough Self confidence.
3. It is difficult for you to accept accusations.
4. You can express your intended feelings on
your face in any situations.
5. You feel loneliness
6. You have a special ability to defuse a discord
between two persons.
7. You have the ability to keep secrets.
8. You don’t forfeit optimism even during
adversities
9. You have the ability to know the impressions
of others about you.
10. You act at any circumstance after due
application of mind.
11. You adopt any means to achieve your desires.
12. You believe that the reasons for your failures
are others interference or adversities.
13. You are fully aware of your potentials.
14. You feel sad, when others triumph on
situations where you have failed.
15. You have special aptitude to adjust with new
situations.
16. Others admire your leadership in many
respects.
17. You have the ability to transform adversities to
favorable situations.
18. You feel yourself unlucky most often.
19. You consider that sympathy and compassion to
others are your special qualities.
20. You have the ability to make your opinion
acceptable to others.
The retest reliability for the test was found to be 0.94. The split-half reliability in case of odd-
even items was 0.92 and that for the first half and second half was 0.90. Both reliability
coefficients are significantly higher which indicate that the present scale is highly consistent
and reliable. The empirical validity of the scale was administering the scale of Daniel
Goleman and present scale to a sample of 60 subjects. The validity was found to be 0.89
which indicates that the present scale is highly valid.
The three key dimensions the scale measures constituting emotional intelligence are:
Emotional competency: Constitutes the capacity to tactfully respond to emotional stimuli
elicited by various situations having high self esteem and optimism, communication, tackling
emotional upsets such as frustration, conflicts and inferiority complexes, enjoying emotions,
doing what succeeds, ability to relate to others, emotional self control, capacity to avoid
emotional exhaustion such as stress, burn out, learning to avoid negative emotions, handling
egoism.
Emotional maturity: constitutes evaluating emotions of oneself and others, identifying and
expressing feelings balancing state of heart and mind adaptability and flexibility, appreciating
others point of view, developing others, delaying gratification of immediate psychological
satisfaction.
Emotional sensitivity: Constitutes understanding threshold of emotional arousal, managing
the immediate environment, maintaining rapport, harmony and comfort with others, letting
others feel comfortable in your company. It also involves being honest in interpersonal
dealings, interpreting cues truthfully, realizing communicability of emotions, moods and
feelings and having an insight into how others evaluate and relate to you.
The Occupational Stress Index
For the other variable under study, occupational stress, The Occupational Stress Index
developed by Srivastav and Singh (1981) was used. This is a standardized scale which
measures the extent of stress which employees perceive arising from various conditions of
their jobs. The scale consists of 46 items for 12 dimensions. The reliability index ascertained
by split half (odd-even) method for the scale was found to be .935 and Cronbach’s alpha
coefficient for the scale was .90. Both reliability coefficients are significantly higher which
indicate that the present scale is well consistent and reliable. The validity of the OSI was
found by computing coefficients of correlation between the scales on OSI and the various
measures of job attitude and job behaviour
15. a 20
b 0
c 0
d 5
e 5
INTERPRETATION:
The total score is interpreted as follows:
YOUR SCORE PERCENTILE INTERPRETATION
285 & above 90 Extremely high
250-284 75 High
176-249 50 Average
141-175 40 Below average
140 and below 15 Try some other day
This test measures some areas of your Personal and Professional life. This is a psychological
test which will help you learn more about yourself. The questionnaire given below will
measure your emotional reactions to different situations. Answer the questions on the Basis
of how you FEEL and not what you THINK. There is no right or wrong answers. Answer
honestly and do not spend too much time on any one item. Usually your first response is the
best response. Do no leave any question unanswered and complete the test in a single sitting.
QUESTIONIRE
1) You have just learnt that you have been ignored for a promotion by the management
for which you were eligible. Moreover, one of your juniors has been selected for the
same promotion. You are upset and feeling frustrated. What do you do?
a) Ignore it- it was your bad luck.
b) Talk it over with your boss, bringing out the facts about your contribution and
ask for reconsideration of the management’s decision.
c) Start abusing the colleague who supersede you, leveling allegations of
manipulation and corruption against him and instigate the union leaders to
organize protests against the management.
d) Move to the court and obtain a stay order and vow top teach befitting lesson to
the management through legal battle.
e) Resign from the organization.
3) As a production manager you are taking a weekly review meeting which also has
some women employees. You overhear a male employee telling an offensive joke
about Women employees. What do you do?
a) Ignore it- it is only a joke.
b) Call the employee in your office after meeting and pull him up.
c) Send the employee to attend a sensitivity programme for changing his
prejudices.
d) Ask the women employees to protest in writing so that you can take
appropriate action.
e) Announce on the spot that such jokes are appropriate and shall not be tolerated
in your organization.
4) In a fit of anger, you have got into an argument with your colleague that has lead to
personal attacks from both sides. The entire office is witness to the unpleasant
episode. You and your colleague has actually never intended to tarnish the image of
each other. How will you tackle this ugly situation?
a) Sit calmly and consider what triggered the argument between you and your
colleague and was it possible to control your anger at that point of time.
b) Avoid arguments and leave the scene.
c) Apologize and ask your colleague to apologize too.
d) Continue with the argument till you reach at some definite conclusion.
e) Complain to the management against your colleague.
6) Imagine you are a site engineer of a large construction company. A worker suddenly
slips down and ides. There is a violent reaction and you are surrounded by the agitated
workers. What will you do?
a) Call the police/management and let them decide the further course of action.
b) Threaten the agitating workers with dire consequences if they do not cool
down immediately.
c) Reason with the workers and explain the safety measures you had taken to
prevent such incidents.
d) Call the agitated workers for a dialogue and ask for their suggestions so that
such incidents do not occur in future.
e) Find an opportunity to slip away from the scene.
7) You are accompanying your friend from Delhi to Agra in his car. You notice another
car loaded with children suddenly overtaking your car and cutting sharply in front of
you abruptly. Your friend, who is driving the car, gets nervous, as he had to apply the
brakes immediately to avoid hitting the other car. What would be your reaction at that
time?
a) Tell your friend to stop and relax for sometimes rather than continue driving.
b) Tell your friend to chase the other car and stop it.
c) Yell at the driver of the other car.
d) Tell your friend to smile and thank God that everyone is safe.
e) Just ignore what had happened as a very minor incident.
8) You are on an aircraft and suddenly the pilot announces that it has been hijacked by
terrorists. Everyone is in a state of shock, nervousness, and utter confusion. What will
be your reaction?
a) Blame yourself for choosing an inauspicious day for traveling.
b) Attend to the instructions of the pilot/airhostess and asks the other fellow
passengers to do the same.
c) Continue to read your magazine and pay little attention to the incident.
d) Cry out and vow not to travel by air by future.
e) Falsely claim that you are a heart patient needing medical attention and beg
the hijackers to release you.
9) Imagine that you are a police officer posted in a sensitive area. You get information
that there have been violent ethnic clashes between two religious communities and a
large number of people have been killed from both sides and property has been
damaged. What action will you take?
a) Decide not to visit the spot personally as there may be danger to your life from
this fury of the public.
b) Take your time to respond- in any case this is not first time riots have
occurred.
c) Try to handle the situation tactfully- assuage the feelings of both communities-
tracking down the reasons for the clash, and taking all desired remedial
measures.
d) Send your subordinate inspector to study the situation.
e) Arrange to handover the dead to the respective families after getting the
postmortem done.
10) You have a grown-up son who starts arguing with you every now and then on matter
relating to your personal and social life. One day he tells you that you have dictated
your terms to the family for very long and cannot continue to exercise the authority
anymore. He also tells you that as a father you cannot impose your outdates attitudes
and irrelevant values on him. He further confronts you and says that he is an adult and
henceforth he will take all major decisions. You are disturbed at his defiant behavior.
How will you tackle him?
a) Accept his statement in helplessness and take a low profile position in the
family.
b) In disgust, tell him to leave home and find a separate place for himself.
c) Send him to a Psychologist to learn to adjust with his environment.
d) For the time being delay the arguments, manage your feelings, sit with him
and explain your point of view as patiently as possible without making the
situation tense.
e) Ignore his hostile comments and change the topic of discussion.
11) This morning an old man was driving his old Fiat car on the Wrong side with his little
grandson on his lap. He was too careless to switch on the indicator before turning the
car and in the process hashed onto the Bonnet of the Maruti car which you were
driving. How will you behave at this time?
a) Just smile at the old man and ask him to be grateful to God for his grandson,
who was safe.
b) Get annoyed at the old man and shout at him.
c) Ask for compensation for the damage.
d) Give the old man a long lecture on how to drive safely.
e) Call the police.
12) Imagine you are a doctor and you have operated upon a cancer patient in the morning.
When you go home for lunch you receive a call that the patient has developed some
complications and you decide to rush back to the hospital. On your way back to the
hospital you are help up at the traffic light, as the signal is red. You wait impatiently
and when the signal turns green you start your car without noticing a scooterist in
front and hit him. He loses his balance but regains it with great difficulty. What will
you do now?
a) Immediately stop the car, get out, and introduce yourself and apologies.
b) Ignore him and keep moving.
c) Thank God that nothing serious had happened.
d) Stop for a moment, collect your thoughts and move towards he hospital.
e) Tell the scooterist what has happened and continue driving.
13) You are a general manager of a large production company. Next week there is a board
meeting and your department is expected to prepare the annual report. You get a cal
from one of the production units in another state that there is a strike and your
presence is urgently required to negotiate with the union. You delegate the
responsibility to your assistant general manager to get the report prepared for the
board meeting in time and assistant manager has not prepared the report and the board
meeting is scheduled the next day. What do you do?
a) Feel remorse for your decision for your decision to delegate to the wrong
person.
b) Get worked up and fire the assistant general manager for failing to carry out
your instructions.
c) Complete the work yourself to avoid embarrassment before the board.
d) Understand the difficulties faced by the assistant general manager in getting
the work completed, motivate him saying that it could still be done and make a
plan to sit long hours to complete the job in time.
e) Send the assistant general manager for further training to sharpen his
managerial skills.
14) You are a professor in a college and while taking a class one of your student’s
comments that your style of teaching is not good, that you have not prepared the topic
properly and also that you are just passing time. How will you react?
a) Report to the principal of the college about the behavior of the student.
b) Ask him to leave the classroom and tell him in strong words that you cannot
change your teaching style.
c) Ask him to meet you after the class in your chamber.
d) Listen to the need of the class and promise to prepare the topic properly in
future.
e) Ignore him and continue with your class.
15) As the CEO of a company you are involved in a meeting with the union leaders on
their pending demands. During the meeting one of the union leaders shouts at you
saying that you are being a liar and levels serious allegations of corruption and
favoritism against you. You are very upset. How will you react to the remarks of the
union leader?
a) Just ignore what he said, continue with the discussion and listen to their
demands with a cool frame of mind.
b) Suspend him from the job.
c) Cancel further negotiations and ask him to apologize first.
d) Advise him not to make personal remarks.
e) Leave the room after assigning the responsibility to your subordinate to
continue with the negations.
EYSENCK’S PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRE
Scoring
The scoring key is used to calculate the responses for the different characters and for the lie
score
Interpretation
NO QUESTIONS YES NO
1 Do you have many different hobbies?
2 Do you stop to think things over before doing anything?
3 Does your mood often go up and down?
4 Have you ever taken the praise for something you knew someone else had
really done?
5 Are you a talkative person?
6 Would being in debt worry you?
7 Do you ever feel “just miserable” for no reason?
8 Were you ever greedy by helping yourself to more than your share of
anything?
9 Do you lock up your house carefully at night?
10 Are you rather lively?
11 Would it upset you a lot to see a child or an animal suffer?
12 Do you often worry about things you should not have done or said?
13 If you say you will do something, do you always keep your promise no
matter how inconvenient it might be?
14 Can you usually let yourself go and enjoy yourself at a lively party?
15 Are you an irritable person?
16 Have you ever blamed someone for doing something you knew was really
your fault?
17 Do you enjoy meeting new people?
18 Do you believe insurance schemes are good ideas?
19 Are your feelings easily hurt?
20 Are all your habits good and desirable ones?
2 N 3 Y 1 Y 4 N
6 N 7 Y 5 Y 8 N
9 N 12 Y 10 Y 13 Y
11 N 15 Y 14 Y 16 N
18 N 19 Y 17 Y 20 Y
22 Y 23 Y 21 N
26 Y 27 Y 25 Y 24 N
30 Y 31 Y 29 N 28 N
33 Y 34 Y 32 Y 35 Y
37 Y 38 Y 36 Y 39 N
43 Y 41 Y 40 Y 44 N
46 Y 47 Y 42 N 48 N
50 Y 45 Y 51 N
53 N 49 Y
52 Y
57 N 54 Y 56 Y 55 Y
61 N 58 Y 60 Y 59 N
65 Y 62 Y 64 Y 63 N
67 Y 66 Y 70 Y 69 N
71 N 68 Y 82 Y 73 N
74 Y 72 Y 78 Y
76 Y 75 Y 81 N
79 Y 77 Y
83 Y 80 Y
87 Y 84 Y 86 N
90 N 88 Y 89 Y
Description
This is a self rating questionnaire developed by Philip L. The nutrition diet profile contains
15 items measured on a 4 point scale. These items provides clues to areas, where a change in
diet and nutritional habits may be pointed. The profile for exercise contains 14 items
measured in a 5 point scale.
Scoring
For nutrition and diet: each item is given weighted score of 1-4. The first question in the
profile is reversely scored. The total score of all the items and this corresponding percentiles
is obtained. High score suggests that the eating habits are fairly good.
For exercise: each item is given a weighted score of 0-4. The total score for all items is
obtained. Count the responses with value or score is obtained. This is the individuals aerobic
index. The corresponding percentage is obtained from scale. A low aerobic index suggest that
the individual is getting fairly good exercise and is following a fair pattern.
HEALTH BEHAVIOUR PROFILE FOR EXCERCIS
Read each statement carefully; mark your response in the appropriate box that most
accurately describes your habits. There is no right or wrong answer and the subjects are
requested not to spend too much time on any item.
1 Swimming
2 Walking(1 mile/day)
3 Hiking or back packing
4 Gardening
5 Bicycling
6 Calisthenics, aerobics, dance,
exercise
7 Racquet ball, tennis
8 Canoeing or boating
9 Water or snow skiing
10 Hunting or fishing
11 Golfing
12 Team sports
13 Running (5 or more miles per
week)
14 Other physical exercise
HEALTH BEHAVIOUR PROFILE FOR NUTRITION AND DIET
Read each statement carefully, mark your response in the appropriate box, that most
accurately describes your habits. There is no right or wrong answer and the subjects are
requested not to spend too much time on any item.
SCORE NATURE
4 SELDOM
3 OCCASIONALLY
2 FREQUENTLY
1 DAILY
Seldom Occasionally Frequently Daily
NO How often do you....
(4) (3) (2) (1)
1 Eat fruits, vegetables, fiber?
There are 40 items; the items of the scale are formed in such way that they can be used for
measuring the degree of involvement of all subjects irrespective of the nature of their work,
organization and machines and tools they [Link] reliability of the scale was computed by
using Cronback’s coefficient technique and it was found to be 0.83. The index homogeneity
and internal validity of the scale was determined by computing the point biserial coefficient
of correlation (r=0.40) to ascertain how the scores on the individual items ranging from 1 to 4
contribute to the score.
Administration:
Administration of Job Involvement questionnaire is simple and straight forward. The items in
the questionnaires are clear, the respondent is asked to evaluate and go through each
statement on the basis of their judgments on the scale. The respondent asked not to ponder
over the statements. Work as fast as he/she can, without omitting any statements. There is no
right or wrong answers.
Scoring:
Strongly Agree 1
Agree 2
Disagree 3
Strongly disagree 4
Reverse scoring:
1,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,19,20,21,22,23,26,27,29,33,34 and 37
By adding, the total score ranges from 40 – 60
1. I do not engage myself in the work after the working hours.
2. I feel relaxed after the working hours.
3. I feel pity when there is no work to do.
4. I feel boredom when I do not have any work to do.
5. I am fully committed to my job.
6. To do work is the best source of recreation for me.
7. When the work problem is not solved then I continue to think about that in the home
also.
8. Sometimes it is difficult for me to have sleep when I think about the job.
9. Sometimes I cut my break to complete my job.
10. I prepare myself at house to attend the work in a better way.
11. I spend myself in job related activities.
12. I get disappointed when my work is not completed.
13. I keep myself engaged in the work without bothering about the happenings with me.
14. I become anxious when the work is not completed.
15. I think about the work at the time of doing it.
16. I leave other important things for my work.
17. It the holiday also I think that my work is not being done.
18. I usually look at the watch for leaving about the time to stop the work.
19. I complete my work even if it takes more than required time without any extra salary.
20. How good a man is can be understood by his quality of work
21. I get maximum satisfaction from my work.
22. My time flies at the work.
23. The important events of myself are related to my work
24. I feel bad at the work.
25. There are other important work to me than the present one.
26. Work is everything to me.
27. Probably I will be continuing on my job ever if I have no need of money.
28. Mostly I like to stay at home in comparison to coming for the work
29. My work is the most important part of my life.
30. I keep self involved in my work.
31. I escape from taking extra work and responsibility other than the allotted work.
32. In the past I had more interest in any work than present.
33. There are other things important than the work.
34. Sometimes I would like to blame myself for my faults at work.
35. I do not stay overtime ever if some work is incomplete.
36. I find boredom in my job.
37. I do not think about the work at the time of returning back to home from work.
38. I have chosen suitable job for myself.
39. More money can be earned from some other job.
40. I work only for money.
JOB SATISFACTION
Bubey,B.L., Uppal, K.K. and Verma, S.K (1989).
The Job satisfaction Scale consists of 25 statements. It is measured on a 5 point scale ranging
from 0 to 4. The questionnaire is independent of age, education and salary. It has reliability
score of 0.64 (test-retest) and 0.72 (split half reliability coefficient).
Administration:
Administration of Job satisfaction questionnaire is simple and straight forward. The items in
the questionnaires are clear, the respondent is asked to evaluate and go through each
statement on the basis of their judgments on the scale. The respondent asked not to ponder
over the statements. Work as fast as he/she can, without omitting any statements. There is no
right or wrong answers.
Scoring
The scores are summed along with the reverse scores for items 24 and 25
Strongly Agree 0
Agree 1
Undecided 2
Disagree 3
Strongly disagree 4
The scores are summed for all the items. Low scores indicate satisfaction and high scores
indicate dissatisfaction.
1. I have been getting promotion as per my qualification and experience.
2. I have full confidence in the management of this organization
3. Favoritism does not have any role to play in this organization
4. On the whole, I am satisfied with the general supervision in my department.
5. Working conditions in this organization are satisfactory
6. I think this organization treats its employees better than any other organization.
7. My superior keeps me informed about all policies / happenings of this organization.
8. I feel that I have opportunity to present my problems to the management
9. My present job is per my ability / qualification and experience
10. My supervisor behaves properly with me.
11. I feel proud of working in this organization
12. Comparing the salary for similar jobs in other organization I feel my pay is better.
13. My supervisor takes into account my wishes as well as works done.
14. As per work requirement my pay is fair.
15. My job has helped me to learn more skills.
16. I feel that my job is reasonably secure as long as I do good work.
17. Promotions are made on merit in this organization.
18. I usually feel fresh at the end of the day’s work.
19. My pay is enough for providing necessary things in my life.
20. There is high team spirit in the work group.
21. I am satisfied with welfare facilities (medical etc.) provided by the organization.
22. On the whole, I feel I have good prospects or advancement in my job.
23. I do not like to do this job but circumstances force me.
24. If I get similar job in some other organization I would like to quit this job.
25. Organization adopts best methods of work as early as possible
Life events questionnaire
Scoring
The stress level of the subject is calculated by adding the corresponding stress values
assigned to the life events.
Interpretation
The following statements are intended to indicate your interest and attitude this is not an
intelligence test and there are no right and wrong answers. Draw a circle around “T” if the
corresponding statement is true and around “F” if it is false. If you are not sure, guess.
No Statements True False
48 I get upset when I have to make a short trip away from home
61 A priest or a religious man can cure disease by putting his hand on your head
75 I liked school
76 I like poetry
86 I like to cook
98 I do not dread going into a room where people have gathered suddenly
11&above 5 & above 6 & above 8& above 5 & above 17& above 4& above 4& above
significant significant significant significant Significant significant significant significant
MULTIDIMENSIONAL HEALTH LOCUS OF CONTROL QUESTIONNAIRE
developed by [Link] A. Wallston
Scoring Method:
The score on each subscale is the sum of the values circled for each item on the subscale (i.e.,
where 1 = "strongly disagree", 2 = moderately disagree, 3 = slightly disagree, 4 = slightly
agree, 5 = moderately agree and 6 = "strongly agree"). No items need to be reversed before
summing. All of the subscales are independent of one another. There is no such thing as a
"total" MHLC score.
Interpretation:
Internal: 1- 36 = Low
37- 72 = Moderate
73- 108 = High
Chance: 1- 36 = Low
37- 72 = Moderate
73- 108 = High
Powerful others: 1- 24 = Low
25- 48 = Moderate
49- 72 = High
Doctors: 1- 6 = Low
7- 12 = Moderate
13- 18 = High
Other people: 1- 6 = Low
7- 12 = Moderate
13- 18 = High
MULTIDIMENSIONAL HEALTH LOCUS OF CONTROL
By Dr. Kenneth A. Wallston
Name :
Age :
Sex :
Intake of ART :
Instructions:
Instructions: Each item below is a belief statement about your medical condition
with which you may agree or disagree. Beside each statement is a scale which ranges
from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (6). For each item we would like you to
circle the number that represents the extent to which you agree or disagree with that
statement. The more you agree with a statement, the higher will be the number you circle.
The more you disagree with a statement, the lower will be the number you circle. Please
make sure that you answer every item and that you circle only one number per item. This
is a measure of your personal beliefs; obviously, there are no right or wrong answers.
Form A
1=STRONGLY DISAGREE (SD) 4=SLIGHTLY AGREE (A)
2=MODERATELY DISAGREE (MD) 5=MODERATELY AGREE (MA)
3=SLIGHTLY DISAGREE (D) 6=STRONGLY AGREE (SA)
S.
STATEMENT SD MD D A MA SA
No.
If I get sick, it is my own behavior which
1 1 2 3 4 5 6
determines how soon I get well again.
No matter what I do, if I am going to get
2 1 2 3 4 5 6
sick, I will get sick.
Having regular contact with my physician
3 1 2 3 4 5 6
is the best way for me to avoid illness.
Most things that affect my health happen to
4 1 2 3 4 5 6
me by accident.
Whenever I don'
t feel well, I should consult
5 1 2 3 4 5 6
a medically trained professional.
6 I am in control of my health. 1 2 3 4 5 6
My family has a lot to do with my
7 1 2 3 4 5 6
becoming sick or staying healthy.
8 When I get sick, I am to blame. 1 2 3 4 5 6
Luck plays a big part in determining how
9 1 2 3 4 5 6
soon I will recover from an illness.
10 Health professionals control my health. 1 2 3 4 5 6
My good health is largely a matter of good
11 1 2 3 4 5 6
fortune.
The main thing which affects my health is
12 1 2 3 4 5 6
what I myself do.
13 If I take care of myself, I can avoid illness. 1 2 3 4 5 6
14 Whenever I recover from an illness, it'
s 1 2 3 4 5 6
usually because other people (for example,
doctors, nurses, family, friends) have been
taking good care of me.
15 No matter what I do, I '
m likely to get sick. 1 2 3 4 5 6
16 If it'
s meant to be, I will stay healthy. 1 2 3 4 5 6
17 If I take the right actions, I can stay healthy. 1 2 3 4 5 6
Regarding my health, I can only do what
18 1 2 3 4 5 6
my doctor tells me to do.
Form B
S.
STATEMENT SD MD D A MA SA
No.
If I become sick, I have the power to make
1 1 2 3 4 5 6
myself well again.
Often I feel that no matter what I do, if I am
2 1 2 3 4 5 6
going to get sick, I will get sick.
If I see an excellent doctor regularly, I am
3 1 2 3 4 5 6
less likely to have health problems.
It seems that my health is greatly
4 1 2 3 4 5 6
influenced by accidental happenings.
I can only maintain my health by consulting
5 1 2 3 4 5 6
health professionals.
6 I am directly responsible for my health. 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 Other people play a big part in whether I 1 2 3 4 5 6
stay healthy or become sick.
Whatever goes wrong with my health is my
8 1 2 3 4 5 6
own fault.
When I am sick, I just have to let nature run
9 1 2 3 4 5 6
its course.
10 Health professionals keep me healthy. 1 2 3 4 5 6
11 When I stay healthy, I'
m just plain lucky. 1 2 3 4 5 6
My physical well-being depends on how
12 1 2 3 4 5 6
well I take care of myself.
When I feel ill, I know it is because I have
13 1 2 3 4 5 6
not been taking care of myself properly.
The type of care I receive from other people
14 is what is responsible for how well I 1 2 3 4 5 6
recover from an illness.
Even when I take care of myself, it'
s easy to
15 1 2 3 4 5 6
get sick.
16 When I become ill, it'
s a matter of fate. 1 2 3 4 5 6
I can pretty much stay healthy by taking
17 1 2 3 4 5 6
good care of myself.
Following doctor'
s orders to the letter is the
18 1 2 3 4 5 6
best way for me to stay healthy.
Form C
S. STATEMENT SD MD D A MA SA
No.
If my condition worsens, it is my own
1 behavior which determines how soon I will 1 2 3 4 5 6
feel better again.
2 As to my condition, what will be will be. 1 2 3 4 5 6
If I see my doctor regularly, I am less likely
3 1 2 3 4 5 6
to have problems with my condition.
Most things that affect my condition
4 1 2 3 4 5 6
happen to me by chance.
Whenever my condition worsens, I should
5 1 2 3 4 5 6
consult a medically trained professional.
I am directly responsible for my condition
6 1 2 3 4 5 6
getting better or worse.
Other people play a big role in whether my
7 condition improves, stays the same, or gets 1 2 3 4 5 6
worse.
Whatever goes wrong with my condition is
8 1 2 3 4 5 6
my own fault.
Luck plays a big part in determining how
9 1 2 3 4 5 6
my condition improves.
In order for my condition to improve, it is
10 up to other people to see that the right 1 2 3 4 5 6
things happen.
Whatever improvement occurs with my
11 condition is largely a matter of good 1 2 3 4 5 6
fortune.
The main thing which affects my condition
12 1 2 3 4 5 6
is what I myself do.
I deserve the credit when my condition
13 1 2 3 4 5 6
improves and the blame when it gets worse.
Following doctor'
s orders to the letter is the
14 best way to keep my condition from getting 1 2 3 4 5 6
any worse.
If my condition worsens, it'
s a matter of
15 1 2 3 4 5 6
fate.
16 If I am lucky, my condition will get better. 1 2 3 4 5 6
If my condition takes a turn for the worse, it
17 is because I have not been taking proper 1 2 3 4 5 6
care of myself.
The type of help I receive from other
18 people determines how soon my condition 1 2 3 4 5 6
improves.
POSSIBLE
SUBSCALE FORM(s) ITEMS
RANGE
Internal A, B, C 6 - 36 1, 6, 8, 12, 13, 17
Chance A, B, C 6 - 36 2, 4, 9, 11, 15, 16
Powerful Others A, B 6 - 36 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 18
Doctors C 3 - 18 3, 5, 14
Other People C 3 - 18 7, 10, 18
The score on each subscale is the sum of the values circled for each item on the subscale
(i.e., where 1 = "strongly disagree" and 6 = "strongly agree"). No items need to be
reversed before summing. All of the subscales are independent of one another. There is
no such thing as a "total" MHLC score.
MYERS–BRIGGS TYPE INDICATOR
The following items are arranged in pairs (a and b), and each member of the pair
represents a preference you may not hold. Rate your preference for each item by giving
a score of 0 to 5 (0 meaning you really feel negative about it or strongly about the other
member of the pair and 5 meaning you strongly prefer it or do not prefer the other
member of the pair). The scores for a and b MUST BE ADD UP TO 5 (0 and 5, 1 and
4, 2 and 3, etc.). Don’t use fractions such as 2 ½.
I prefer:
1a. ____ making decisions after finding out what others think.
1b. ____ making decisions without consulting others.
3a. ____ making decisions about people in organizations based on available data and
systematic analysis of situations.
3b. ____ making decisions about people in organizations based on empathy, feelings,
and an understanding of their needs and values.
6a. ____ using methods I know well that are effective to get the job done.
6b. ____trying to think of new methods of doing tasks when confronted with them.
7a. ____ drawing conclusion based on unemotional logic and careful step- by- step
analysis.
7b. ____ drawing conclusion based on what I feel and believe about life and people
from past experiences.
9a. ____ talking awhile and then thinking to myself about the subject.
9b. ____ talking freely for an extended period and thinking to myself at a later time.
12a. ____ considering every possible angle for a long time before and after making a
decision.
12b. ____ getting the information I need, considering it for a while, and then making a
fairly quick, firm decision.
26a. ____ carrying out carefully laid, detailed plans with precision.
26b. ____ designing plans and structures without necessarily carrying them out.
Description
The Parental Stress Scale is a self-report scale that contains 18 items representing pleasure or
positive themes of parenthood (emotional benefits, self achievement, personal development)
and negative components (demands on resources, opportunity costs & restrictions). The scale
is intended to be used for the assessment of parental stress for both mothers and fathers and
for parent’s assessment of parental stress for both mothers and fathers and for parents of
children with and without clinical problem.
Reliability
The Parental Scale demonstrated satisfactory levels of internal reliability (.83) and test – re
test reliability (.81).
Validity
The scale demonstrated satisfactory convergent validity with various measures of stress,
emotion, and role satisfaction, including perceived stress, work / family stress, anxiety,
guilty, marital satisfaction, marital commitment, job satisfaction and social support.
Discriminate between parents of typically developing children and parents of children with
both developmental and behavioural problems.
Administration
The test can be administered individually as well as in a group. The respondents are asked to
agree or disagree with items in terms of their typical relationship with their child or children and
to rate each item on a five-point scale.
Strongly disagree (1)
Disagree (2)
Undecided (3)
Agree (4) and
Strongly agree (5).
Scoring
All scores are added up, eight items are reversed scored. (Items 1,2,5,6,7,8,17&18). The
scores range from 18-90. Based on scores we can interpret as mild, moderate and severe
stress level. Higher scores on the scale indicate greater stress.
PARENTAL STRESS SCALE (PSS)
Instructions: The following statements describe feelings and perceptions about the
experience of being a parent. Think of each item in terms of how your relationship
with your child or children typically is. Please indicate the degree to which you agree
or disagree with the following items by placing the appropriate number in the space
provided.
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly Disagree
Parents’ perception of support was assessed using a scale designed by Van Dongen-Melman
et al. as part of an extensive questionnaire for assessing the psychosocial situation s of parents
of children with cancer (Van Dongen-Melman, 1995; Van Dongen-Melman et al., 1995)
(Refer Appendix II). Originally the scale score were computed inversely to assess loneliness.
Since the majority of the items concern how the respondent perceives support from people
the scale was in this study chosen as the measure of perceived social support. The scale
contains 8 items, five of which concern general social relations and three the child’s disease.
Parents rated the item son a 4-point Likert scale: ‘I strongly Agree’, ‘I Agree’, ‘I Disagree’,
or ‘I strongly Disagree’. Evaluation of the scale has not been done. Cronbach’s alpha value
for the in this study was 0.85 indicating good reliability.
Procedure
The subjects are asked to read the instructions carefully. The instructions given are as
follows: “Read each question carefully. How strongly do you agree or disagree with the
following statements. Record your response with a tick (_) mark. Please do not omit any
item.
Scoring
Each individual was assigned a measure of perceived social support, through dividing the
total individual score by the number of non-missing items, thus receiving a mean value
within the range 1-4. A higher value reflects more satisfaction with support.
Questionnaire
I strongly I strongly
[Link]. Items I Agree I Disagree
Agree Disagree
This instrument is for your own use. So be frank in your responses. Read each statement
given below and indicate your score against the corresponding numbers provided in the score
sheet by following the guidelines given in the five point scale
Score 4: If it is most characteristic of you or if you always or most often behave or feel -
this way.-
Score 3: If is fairly true of you, or you quite often behave or feel this way-
Score 1: If it is not true or if you only occasionally feel or behave this way-
Score 0: If it is not at all characteristic of you or you seldom feel or behave this way-
Reliability:
The reliability of the test was examined using ‘test-retest’ and ‘split half’ methods and
was found to be significantly high 0.88 and 0.86 respectively.
Validity:
Validity of the PGI HQ N-1 was established, administering other well-known tests of
neuroticism concomitantly. It was fond that the total score of the PGI HQ N-1 was highly
correlated with similar trait of other scales. Separate scores of section ‘A’ and ‘B’ were found
having relatively lower correlation (though still significant) with measures of neuroticism on
other tests. This confirms that a combination of ‘physical’ and ‘psychological’ scores
constitutes a better measure of neuroticism. If one obtains high score only on one of the two
sections, then there are relatively less chances of being a case of neurosis. The test was cross
validated on fresh samples, it was found that mean scores of male and female psychiatric
population were comparable but were markedly distinct from normals were found to be 8.61
(N=70) male and 8.64 (N=8.64) female respectively.
SCORING METHOD
A high score need not always indicate neurosis, but (a) it shows a propensity to
develop neurotic symptoms under stress, and (b) neurotic score high than normals. Some of
the ‘normals’ do develop symptoms later and a few neurotics tend to deny the presence of
symptoms, which may be considered as socially undesirable responses. There is no fixed
number of question (a cut off point) above, which all neurotics should score on the test.
Health Questionnaire
Directions: Here are few statements, read them carefully and tick (9) those items which are
applicable on you.
SL..No. STATEMENTS RESPONSE
AREA-A
1. I get tired easily.
3. I am much worried.
AREA-B
mistakes in my work.
before me.
Dr. Rosenberg was a professor of sociology at the university of Maryland. He received his
PhD from Columbia university.
The original sample for which the scale was developed in the 1960s consisted of 5024 high
school seniors and juniors from 10 randomly selected schools in New York state and was
scored as a Guttman Scale. The scale generally has high reliability; test-retest correlations are
typically in range of .82 to .88 and Cronbach’s alpha for various sample are in the range of
.77 to .88 ( Blascovich and Tomaka 1993 and Rosenberg 1986) studies have demonstrated
both unidimensional and a two-factor (self confidence and self-deprecation) structure to the
scale.
Scoring
The item number 1, 3, 4, 7, 10 are given scores as follows,
3 for strongly agree
2 for agree
1 for disagree
0 for strongly disagree
The reverse scores are given to item number 2, 5, 6, 8, 9 as follows,
0 for strongly agree
1 for agree
2 for disagree
3 for strongly disagree
Norms
0-10 - low self esteem
10-20 – average self esteem
20-30 - high self esteem.
Instructions
The questionnaire has 10 statements that find out one’s attitude towards life. There is no right
or wrong answers. Read each statement and mark the respond which indicate the extent to
which you feel that way, based on your experience.
SA - Strongly agree
A - Agree
D - Disagree
SD – Strongly disagree
SA A D SD
This 48 item inventory consists of positively and negatively phrased statements about
abilities and strengths related to the affective and cognitive dimension. The positively and
negatively phrased statements are equally balanced in number. Out of the 48 items, 24 items
are positively phrased and another 24 items are negatively phrased. All positively phrased
statements affirm a positive quality and all negatively phrased statements deny a negative
quality. The acceptance of a statement as being character of one-self signifies, in either case,
a positive evaluation of the self. This inventory is intended to measure variations in self-
regard.
Moshin developed this self-concept scale and established high validity and reliability for the
test. It was indicated that the inventory is highly sensitive to individual differences. It has
been used for academic purposes, by many researchers in measuring variations in the self-
concepts among individuals.
Author established its validity by item analysis. The split half reliability of the inventory was
found to be 0.57 for the half and 0.73 for the full inventory using the Spearman-Brown
formula. Inter-sample correlation was computed by dividing the sample into two groups, and
the correlation was found to be 0.78. This indicates that the inventory as a whole is highly
sensitive to individual differences.
Instructions
“You will find below a number of statements. You have to read each one carefully and judge
whether it correctly describes you. If you think the statement to be applicable to you, put a
tick ( ) mark and if it does not apply to you, put a cross (x) in the brackets given against each
statement. Do not omit any item. There is no time limit for the test, but try to answer as
quickly as possible. There is no right or wrong answer please be frank and honest. Your
answers will be treated confidential and will be used for academic purposes only.”
The score is total number of items marked tick ( ). The maximum possible score is 48 and
the least can even be 0. Higher the score, higher the self concept.
Here in this study the researcher took 30 and below as having lower self concept and 31 and
above as having higher self concept.
Self concept
The tool that was used to measure the self-esteem of orthopaedically challenged adolescents
was “Self-Esteem Inventory” by [Link] (1996). This questionnaire was constructed
by [Link] (1996). The multidimensional self-esteem questionnaire consists of 83
items in the form of statements. It has both positive and negative items. Categories are well
mixed to reduce the halo effect and the logical error, and double-barreled statements are
avoided. Each statement has four alternative responses such as ‘Always’, ‘Most of the time’,
‘Sometimes’ and ‘Never’. The inventory measures six dimensions of self-esteem:
Competency (16 items), Global self-esteem (16 items), Moral and self control (13 items),
Social-Esteem (12 items), Family (11 items) and Body and Physical Appearance (9 items).
Competency means ability to evaluate and understand one’s personal resources. This feeling
reflects esteem based on his skills, talents and unique achievements.
Global self-esteem is the general appraisal of the self and it is based on adolescent’s
evolution of all parts of himself. A positive global self-esteem would be reflected in feelings
such as, ‘I am a good person’ or ‘I respect myself’.
Moral and self control is the reflection of feeling good as being honest, sincere, adhering to
social values etc. adolescents who value these supposed to have the feeling of good about
themselves.
Social esteem encompasses the adolescents feeling about himself as a friend to others. Do
others like him, value his ideas, and include him in their activities? Does he feel satisfied with
his interactions and relationship with peers? A child whose social needs are being met, will
feel comfortable with this aspect of himself.
Family self -esteem reflects his feelings about himself as a member of his family. A person
who feels he is a valued member of his family, who makes his own unique contribution, and
who is secure in the love and respect he receives from parents and siblings, will have a high
positive self-esteem in this area.
Body and physical appearance is the body image as a contribution of physical appearance
and capabilities. The adolescent’s self-esteem in this area is based upon his satisfaction with
the way his body looks and performs.
Scoring
The scoring key is given below:
Competency: 1, 8*, 15,22,29*, 36,43,49,55,61,66*, 71,75,78,80 and 82.
Maximum possible score: 64
Global self-esteem scale: 2,9,16*, 23*, 30,37,44*, 50,56,62,67*, 72,76*, 79*, 81*, and
83. Maximum possible score: 64
Moral and self -control scale: 3,10*, 17,24,31*, 38,45,51,57*, 63*, 68*, 73* and 77.
Maximum possible score: 52
Social esteem scale: 4,11,18*, 25,32*, 39*, 46,52*, 58,64*, 69* and 74.
Maximum possible score: 48
Family scale: 5,12*, 19,26,33*, 40*, 47*, 53,59*, 65 and 70.
Maximum possible score: 44
Body and physical appearance scale: 6,13,20*, 27*, 34,41*, 48,54 and 60*.
Maximum possible score: 36
Lie scale: 7,14,21,28*, 35 and42.
Maximum possible score: 24
Higher the score in each dimension the level of self-esteem is high.
* Asterisk indicates reverse scoring procedure i.e.
1 = Always
2 = Most of the time
3 = Sometimes
4 = Never
Remaining items are scored as it is (i.e)
4 = Always
3 = Most of the time
2 = Sometimes
1 = Never
PERSONAL DETAILS
Instructions: These questions are to help you learn more about how boys and girls of
your age feel about different things. There are no right or wrong answers. It is important
that you answer the way you really feel and not how somebody else thinks you should
feel. Please indicate your responses by circling the appropriate response Always, Most Of
The Time, Sometimes or Never. There is no time limit, but please try to answer the
questions as early as possible. Do not omit any question.
1) I am happy that I am talented.
7) I do everything perfectly
9) I respect myself.
Always Most of the time Sometimes Never
Never
The sacks sentence completion test from has 60 items which are4 incomplete sentence. It has
sentences which when completed will determin an individual’s attitude towards mother,
father, family unit, women, hetro sexual relationhip, friend and acquaintances superiors at
work, colleagues, subordinate fears guilt, abilities, past, future and goals. This also denotes
the personality structure of the individual, emotional adjustment, maturity, reality level and
conflict management. The time period is twenty minutes
Scoring
The sentence completion is scored from the scoring principles given in the manual.
Responses are scored positive and negative.
Interpretation
2 Severely disturbed, require therapeutic intervention
1 Mildly disturbed, able to handle them
0 No significant disturbance
X In significant evidence
Sentence completion test
Complete these sentences to express your real feeling, try to do every one of the item. Be sure
to make complete sentence.
1. I feel that my father is seldom ………………………………………………………
2. When the odds are against me ……………………………………………………….
3. I always wanted to……………………………………………………………………
4. If I were in charge …………………………………………………………………….
5. To me the future looks ………………………………………………………………..
6. The men over me ………………………………………………………………………
7. I know it is silly, but I am afraid of………………………………………………………
8. I feel that a real friend is ………………………………………………………………...
9. When I was a child ………………………………………………………………………
10. My idea of a perfect woman ………………………………………………………........
11. When I see a man and a woman together ……………………………………………....
12. Compared with most families, mine ………………………………………………........
13. At work I get along best with…………………………………………………………...
14. My mother ……………………………………………………………………………..
15. I would do anything to forget the time…………………………………………………..
16. If my father would only ………………………………………………………………...
17. I believe that I have the ability to……………………………………………………....
18. I would be perfectly happy if…………………………………………………………...
19. If people work for me …………………………………………………………………..
20. I look forward to………………………………………………………………………...
21. In school, my teachers…………………………………………………………………...
22. Most of my friends do not know that I am afraid of…………………………………….
23. I do not like people who ………………………………………………………………..
24. Before the war…………………………………………………………………………..
25. I think most girls are…………………………………………………………………….
26. My feeling about married life is ………………………………………………………...
27. My family treats me like a ……………………………………………………………..
28. Those I work with are…………………………………………………………………..
29. My mother and I are ……………………………………………………………………
30. My greatest mistake was ………………………………………………………………
31. I wish my father ………………………………………………………………………
32. My greatest weakness is ………………………………………………………………..
33. My secret ambition in life is…………………………………………………………….
34. The people who work for me …………………………………………………………..
[Link] day I……………………………………………………………………………….
36. When I see the boss coming……………………………………………………………..
37. I wish I could lose the fear of…………………………………………………………...
38. The people I like best are……………………………………………………………….
39. If I were a child again ………………………………………………………………….
40. I believe most women …………………………………………………………………..
41. If I have sex relation…………………………………………………………………….
42. Most families I know..………………………………………………………………….
43. I like working with people who………………………………………………………..
44. I think that most mothers……………………………………………………………….
45. When I was younger I felt guilty about………………………………………………...
46. I feel that my father is…………………………………………………………………..
47. When luck turns against me…………………………………………………………….
48. What I want most out of life is…………………………………………………………
49. In giving orders to others I ……………………………………………………………..
50. When I am older………………………………………………………………………
51. People whom I consider my superiors …………………………………………………
52. My fears sometimes force me to………………………………………………………...
53. When I am not around, my friends ……………………………………………………..
54. My most vivid childhood memory……………………………………………………...
55. What I like least about women …………………………………………………………
56. My sex life is…………………………………………………………………………….
57. When I was a child, my family………………………………………………………….
58. People who work with me usually……………………....................................................
59. I like my mother, but……………………………………………………………………
60. The worst thing I ever did ………………………………………………………….......
SOCIAL RETICENCE SCALE
Jones and Briggs
Below is a list of statements dealing with your general feelings about yourself and your perception
about others attitude towards you. If you think the statement is extremely true then circle 5, if you
think it is very true then circle 4, moderately true then circle 3, slightly true then circle 2 and if it is
not at all true then circle [Link] not skip any statement.
Not
[Link] Statement Extremely Very Moderately Slightly at all
true true true true true
I frequently have difficulties in
1. meeting people 5 4 3 2 1
I seldom feel isolated from other
2. people 5 4 3 2 1
I have a hard time expressing my
3. opinions with others 5 4 3 2 1
I usually know what to say in a group
4. 5 4 3 2 1
Many people apparently think I am
5. unfriendly 5 4 3 2 1
I seldom keep quiet in groups,
6. especially when I have something to 5 4 3 2 1
say
It is difficult for me to make friends
7. 5 4 3 2 1
I frequently feel isolated from other
8. people 5 4 3 2 1
I have difficulty in being assertive,
9. even when it is appropriate or I need to 5 4 3 2 1
be
I have few problems in meeting new
10. people 5 4 3 2 1
Many people think I am snobbish or
11. bored because I am not very outgoing 5 4 3 2 1
It is difficult for me to know what to
12. say in a group 5 4 3 2 1
I make new friends easily
13. 5 4 3 2 1
Ordinarily, I communicate effectively
14. 5 4 3 2 1
I can express my opinions to others
15. effectively 5 4 3 2 1
This scale measures Anxiety – state. It consists of 2o items. It evaluates feelings of tension,
nervousness, worry and apprehension. Each item was expected to reflect the subject’s level
of anxiety at that particular moment of time.
Administrative Procedure
The following instructions were given, “This inventory consists of a number of statements
which people use to describe themselves. Read each statement and indicte your answer to the
right of the statement under the appropriate letter or classification with regard to how you feel
at present or at the moment. There is no right or wrong answer. Do not spend too much time
on each answer.
Spielberger, Gorsuch and Lushene (1970) have found the internal consistency co-efficient to
be high on state anxiety scale median .3 retest reliability was established for this scale.
Scoring
The scores were reversed on the following items. 1,2,5,8,10,11,15,16,19, and 20. the other
items were scored directly. Thus a total score of anxiety-state was obtained.
This measures Anxiety – Trait. It measure reliability stable individual difference in anxiety
process. It consists of 20 items.
Administrative Procedure
With regard to Anxiety – Trait Scale the subjects were given similar instructions as for
anxiety – state scale with one important difference. They were told to answer the questions
with regard to how they feel generally.
Spielberger, Gorsuch and Lushene (1970) have found the internal consistency co-efficient for
trait anxiety scale. They found high retest reliabilities of 0.7 to 0.9.
Scoring
The Anxiety – Trait was scored by reversing the scores on the following items.
1,6,7,10,13,16 and 19. The other items were scored directly. A total score on trait anxiety
was obtained.
Self-Analysis Questionnaire
Form Y-1(STATE)
Directions: A number of statements which people have used to describe themselves are given
below. Read each statement and then circle the appropriate number to the right side of the
statement to indicate how you feel right now, that is, at this moment.
There is no right or wrong answers. Do not spend too much time on any one statement but
give the answer which seems to describe your present feelings best:
Directions: A number of statements which people have used to describe themselves are given
below. Read each statement and then circle the appropriate number to the right side of the
statement to indicate how you generally feel.
There is no right or wrong answers. Do not spend too much time on any one statement but
give the answer which seems to describe your present feelings best:
As the name implies there are two fundamental aspects of anger which are addressed -
the experience of anger, and the expression of anger. The experience of anger can be
understood in the context of state - subjective feelings that vary from irritability to intense
rage, and trait anger which refers to a disposition to perceive situations as annoying and to
respond to these situations by more frequent expressions of state anger. Thus state and trait
anger are unlikely to actually be independent characteristics or components of anger.
When expressing anger, it may be focused outward on other people or objects (Anger-
Out), or directed inward (Anger-In). A third component is the degree to which people attempt
to control their expression of anger (Anger Control).
STAXI Scales:
The STAXI consists of 44 items which are distributed across the five main scales.
Consistent with the conceptualisation of anger above there are three main aspects to the
STAXI scales: State, Trait, and Anger Expression. Trait contains two subscales that examine
different dispositions in trait anger - temperament and reaction. Anger Expression is actually
an experimental composite of the three expression constructs -In, Out, and Control.
S-Anger - This is a 10-item stand-alone scale which measures the respondent's current
feelings of anger.
T-Anger - This scale also contains 10 items which asks the respondent to answer questions
about his or her disposition towards anger.
T-Anger/T - is a subscale of T-Anger consisting of 4 items that generally address the
disposition to express anger without provocation.
T-Anger/R - is a subscale of T-Anger also consisting of 4 items that ask about the
respondent's disposition to express anger when provoked.
AX/In - this 8 item scale measures the frequency with which the respondent holds in or
suppresses his or her anger.
AX/Out - this 8 item scale measures the frequency with which the respondent expresses her
anger to other people or objects.
AX/Con - another 8 item scale that attempts to measure the degree to which the respondent
attempts to control his or her expression of anger.
All items are rated on a four-point scale and are assigned a score of between 1 and 4.
Raw score totals are converted to percentile ranks and T-scores using normative tables. There
are separate normative tables for males and female adolescents, adults, and college students.
There are also special population normative tables for
Standardisation:
The normative sample for the STAXI is an impressive 9,000 subjects broken down in the
following way:
3,769 Adults. Mean age of the combined sample was 40 years. This group was comprised of
heterogenous samples that included managerial, technical, clerical, sales, and factory workers
(360 males, 328 females); people participating in a stress management program (202 males,
93 females); health care managers (16 males, 131 females); military personnel (1890 males,
104 females) and a small sample of postal workers (33 males, 23 females). Don't bother
adding it up - they're 589 short!
2,762 Undergraduate college students the vast majority of whom (2,122 - 777 males, 1,345
females) were enrolled in Introductory Psychology units. The remaining 640 (600 males, 40
females) were cadets at West Point (U.S. Military Academy). Notice that while the combined
gender totals are very similar (1377 males, 1385 females) they are the product of two
extremely gender biased samples. Median age was 19 years.
2,469 adolescents in junior and senior high schools. Median age was 14 years.
Influence of Demographic Variables:
Age:
Age appears to have a profound effect on STAXI scores. Adolescents score highest
and adults score lowest on all measures - this is used to justify the use of these three separate
normative groups. However, within the adult group there is also a significant effect of age -
responses by 18-30 year olds were higher than those of the 31-40, and 41+ age groups.
Interestingly, no separate norms are made available for 18-30 year-olds and 31+ adults.
Sex:
Minimal differences were found across the three samples in terms of the gender of
respondents. Again this is interesting as the norms provided are separate for males and
females. The variable that does not impact on scores (sex) is accounted for and the variable
that does impact on scores (age) is not - at least in the adult sample.
Interpreting Scores:
Raw scores are converted into percentile ranks for interpretative purposes. Scores that
are commonly found in the middle fifty percent of the distribution - the 25th to 75th
percentiles are considered to fall within the normal range. Individuals with high anger scores
(above the 75th percentile) are endorsing levels of state, trait, expression, or control that are
likely to impair their optimal functioning. Very high scores would fall at or above the 90th
percentile. The distributions for S-Anger and T-Anger/T are so skewed that low scores are
unlikely to be interpretable. Individuals who score below the 25th percentile on the remaining
six scales, however, generally experience, express, or control relatively little anger.
Reliability:
College Students
Scale Males Females
S-Anger .93 .90
T-Anger .82 .83
T-Anger/T .88 .89
T-Anger/R .71 .70
AX/In .73 .74
AX/Out .75 .77
AX/Con .85 .84
Validity:
Validity for the STAXI scales is based primarily upon convergent and divergent
validity. Essentially this is established through showing high correlations among tests that are
purported to measure the same or similar constructs and low correlations among tests that
measure distinct or different constructs.
A number of statements that people use to describe themselves are given below. Read
each statement and then fill in the circle with the number, which indicates how you feel right
now. Remember that there are no right or wrong answers. Do not spend too much time on
any statement, but give the answer which seems to best describe your present feelings.
2. I feel irritated. 1 2 3 4
3. I feel angry. 1 2 3 4
6. I am mad. 1 2 3 4
9. I am burned up. 1 2 3 4
A number of statements that people use to describe themselves are given below. Read
each statement and then fill in the circle with the number, which indicates how you generally
feel. Remember that there are no right or wrong answers. Do not spend too much time on any
statement, but give the answer which seems to best describe you generally feel.
How I generally feel Almost Sometimes Often Almost
never always
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Everyone feels angry or furious from time to time, but people differ in the ways that
they react when they are angry. A number of statements are listed below which people use to
describe their reactions when they feel angry or furious. Read each statement and then fill in
the circle with the number which indicates how often you generally react or behave in the
manner described when you are feeling angry or furious. Remember that there are no right or
wrong answers. Do not spend much time on any one statement.
Description
The stress questionnaire developed by Latha Satish, consists of 52 items arranged from
questions from mild, moderate and severe stress (which affects the adjustment of the
individual). This lists the life experience based on the amount of change or adjustment one
has to make to life rather that the undesirability of events themselves. It also has a control
index where the subject has to record whether he/she has complete, partial or no control over
the experienced stressful situation.
Administration
The subject was given the following instruction: “this questionnaire studies the day to day
problems encountered or experienced by people and the way they react to it. Here are the
lists of events/situations you will have to mark ‘YES’ if you have experience them and mark
‘NO’ if they are not applicable to you. You also have to indicate the amount of control such
as you have whether partial, complete, or no control over the situation in which you have
given ‘YES’ response by putting a tick mark in the appropriate column.”
The scale was tried out on a sample of 80 subjects. The items reliability value was 0.86. a test
reliability on a sample of 30 subjects was found to be 0.96 9 (P < 0.01). The content validity
based on judges rating was 0.86.
Scoring
The level of stress can be obtained by adding the number of “YES” responses from the 52
items and the scores are checked with the interpretation from the stress index.
Interpretation of stress level
Stress questionnaire
Latha Satish
Instructions:
The subject was given the following instructions-“this questionnaire studies the day to day
problems encountered or experienced by people and the way they react to it. Here are the
lists of events/situations you will have to mark ‘YES’ if you have experienced them and mark
‘NO’ if they are not applicable to you. You also have to indicated the amount of control
such as you had whether partial, complete, or no control over the situation in which you have
given ‘YES’ response by putting a mark in the appropriate column.”
List of situations/events/ problem YES/NO Amount of control over it
Complete Partial No
control control control
1, Lack of holiday rest
2,Too much to do at shot period
3, Uncertainty of coming days
4, Prices sky rocketing
5, Addition of new family members
6, Lack of domestic help
7, Change in sleeping habits
8, Lack of emotional support at home
9, Career pressure
10, Academic pressure
11, Very high family pressure to earn more
12, Increased work load at home
13, Pollution and slum conditions in the
locality
14, Lack of job satisfaction
15, Getting married
16, Appearing for examination
17, Lack of understanding between staff
in work place
18, Failure in exams or other
achievements
19, Discrimination in work place because
of your sex/physical characteristics/
religion/social status
20, Lack of monetary security
21, Daughter’s marriage
22, Family conflict
23, Huge loan to be repaid
24, Lack of child (male)
25, unemployment
26, Sexual difficulties
27, Unwanted pregnancy
28, Conflict over dowry
29, Feel a sense of worthlessness or
hopelessness
30, Lack of promotion or incentives
31, Heavy responsibility in work situation
32, Financial loss of problem
33, Decline in social life
34, Too much time pressure
35,Anxiety about unfulfilled
commitments
36, Illness of family members
37, Major personal illness
38, Lack of confidence in oneself
39, Broken love affaires
40, Lack of support or excessive
expectation from yourself and those
around you
41, Intense arguments with spouse
42, Sense of loneliness
43, Marital conflict
44, Alcoholism/drug addition by family
member
45, Trouble with parent-in-law
46, Suspension or dismissal from job
47, Extreme boredom
48, Lack of sense of self-worth
49, Having a handicapped child
50, Marital separation/divorce
51, Extra marital relation of spouse
52, Death of close family member/any
other.
Stress coping- behavior measure
Instructions: when some unhappy events happen, people behave in different ways to adjust
to it. Listed below are some such ways of managing distressing events, by an ordinary
person . Read each statement carefully and indicate (tick mark) if it applies to you generally.
Also indicate the extent to which you behave in that way, on a five point scale ,(1,2,3,4,5) If
you don’t use that method mark “never” No. (1) By circling the No.1. and if that is typical of
you then mark “always” (No. 5) . For e.g.: item No. 12 If you worry very often then circle
No.4
SCALE:
Score Nature
1 Never
2 Very rarely
3 Sometimes
4 Very often
5 Always
No Items Scale
1 Hope that things will get better. 1 2 3 4 5
2 Try to maintain some control over the situation. 1 2 3 4 5
3 Find out more about the situation so that you can handle it better. 1 2 3 4 5
4 Think through different ways to handle the problem. 1 2 3 4 5
5 Look at the problem objectively. 1 2 3 4 5
6 Eat, smoke: chew gum. 1 2 3 4 5
7 Try out different ways of solving the problem to see which works the best. 1 2 3 4 5
8 Draw on past experience to help you handle the situation . 1 2 3 4 5
9 Try to find meaning in the situation. 1 2 3 4 5
10 Pray: Trust in God 1 2 3 4 5
11 Got nervous 1 2 3 4 5
12 Worry 1 2 3 4 5
13 Break the problem down into smaller pieces 1 2 3 4 5
14 Seek comfort or help from family or friends 1 2 3 4 5
15 Set specific goals to help solve the problem 1 2 3 4 5
16 Accept the situation as it is 1 2 3 4 5
17 Want to be alone 1 2 3 4 5
18 Laugh it off, figuring that things could be worse 1 2 3 4 5
19 Try to put the problem out of your mind 1 2 3 4 5
20 Day dream, fantasize 1 2 3 4 5
21 Get prepared to expect the worst 1 2 3 4 5
22
Talk the problem over with someone who has been in the same type of
1 2 3 4 5
Situation.
The aspects of the study skill measured in the questionnaire are organization of time, goal
setting, ability to concentrate learning methods and obstacles to effective study.
Scoring
A, b, c, d yes 1
No 1 for each
Interpretation
Scoring level
STUDY METHOD
NO Statements Yes No
1 I study daily in the (any one option to be ticked)
a) Morning
b) Evening
c) Morning and evening
d) No every day
HOME WORK
37 I make a note of home work for the next day
38 I do the home work by myself
39 I set aside time to complete my home work
REGARDING EXAMINATION
40 I practice writing important answers before the examination
41 I learn only those answers that I am likely to be questioned about, in the
examination
42 I practice arithmetic sums before the examination
43 I learn a particular chapter only after a test has been announced in it
44 I learn without taking any test on the day before the examination
45 I recollect the points required for an answer before I write it down
46 I time my answers during an examination
47 I revise the answers before submitting my answer papers
OBSTACLES TO EFFECTIVE STUDY
48 I am not able to study well due to excessive household chores
49 I do not find time to study because I spend too much time on leisure
50 I am not able to study because my home is very noisy
51 I am not interested in studies because my parents do not encourage me with
gift articles
52 I am not interested in studies because my teachers do not give me sufficient
encouragement
SYMPTOM SIGN INVENTORY
A ANXIETY
B DEPRESSION
C MANIA
D PARANOIA
E OBSESSION
G HYPOCHONDRIASIS
H HYSTERIA
Scoring:
“A”
“B”
“C”
1. Do you ever feel so confident and successful that there is nothing you cannot achieve?
2. Do you ever become very excited, happy at times, for no special reason?
3. Are you ever so cheerful that you want to laugh and joke with everyone?
4. Are there times when exciting new ideas and schemes occur to you one after another?
5. Are you full of pep and energy that you carry on things indefinitely?
6. Do you ever become excited that your thoughts race ahead faster than you can
express them?
7. Are you ever so cheerful that you want to wear lot of gay things like button-holes,
flowers, bright ties. Jewellery, etc?
8. When you get bored do you like to stir up some excitement?
9. Do you ever feel so full of energy and ideas that you don’t want to go to bed?
10. Are you a much important person than people seem to think?
“D”
1. Are people talking about you and criticizing you though no fault of yours?
2. Have you an important mission to carry out?
3. Are there people trying to harm you though no fault of your own?
4. Is someone trying to poison you or make you ill in some way/
5. Have you some special powers, abilities, or influences which is not recognized by other
people?
6. Is someone. Other than yourself, deliberately causing most of your troubles?
7. Are people plotting against you though no fault of own?
8. Do you ever take strong action against evil person for the sake of a principle?
9. Do you ever see someone do or say something, which most people do not take much
notice of, but which you know has a special meaning?
10. Can people read your thoughts and make you do things against your will by a sort of
hypnotism?
11. Are you accused of things, infact you have not done?
“E”
1. Are you distressed by silly, pointless thoughts that keep coming into your mind
Against your will?
2. Are you compelled to think over abstract problems again and again until you cannot
Leave them alone?
3. Are you unnecessarily careful in carrying out even simple everyday tasks like folding
up clothes, reading notices,etc.,
4. Are you unable to prevent yourself from doing pointless things like tapping lamp
Posts, touching things, counting windows, uttering phrases etc.,
5. Are you afraid you might do something wrong seriously against your will?
6. Do distressing thoughts about sex or religion come to your mind against your will?
7. Do you feel you must check things again and again like turning off taps or
lights, shutting windows at night, etc- although you know there is really no need?
8. Have you any reasonable fear that careless act of yours might have serious
consequences?
9. Are you excessively concerned about cleanliness?
10. Do you have any uneasy feeling that if you don’t do something in a certain order that
something might go wrong?
11. Do you find yourself unable to avoid thinking about some topic which you realize is
quite unimportant?
“F”
1. Do you feel that there is some sort of barrier between you and other people so that you
cannot really understand them?
2. Do you ever see visions, or people, animals, or things around you that other people
don’t seem to see?
3. Do you often wonder who you really are?
4. Do you ever have strange and peculiar experiences?
5. Do you think other people regard you as very old?
6. Do you often feel puzzled, as if something has gone wrong either with you or with the
world, without knowing what it is?
7. Do you ever hear voices without knowing where they come from?
8. Do you feel that you cannot communicate with other people because you don’t seem to
Be on the same wave length?
9. Do you have very strange and peculiar thoughts at times?
10. Is there something unusual about your body like one side being different from other
and meaning something different?
11. Do you sometimes have difficulty with your thinking?
12. Do you sometimes think that you do not have the same strong feeling that others
seem to have?
“G”
1. Do you ever lose the use of your arm or leg or face muscle?
2. Do you ever have fits or have difficultly in keeping your balance?
3. Do you ever completely lose your voice (except from bad cold)?
4. Do you ever lose all feelings in any part of skin, so that you would not be able to feel a
pin prick, or you even ever have burning or tingling sensations?
5. Do you ever have ‘blackouts’; dizzy spells, or fainting?
6. Have you ever been in poor physical health during most of the past few years?
7. Do you often suffer from blurring of vision or any other difficulties with your sight,
which no one seems able to put it right?
8. Are you often bothered with pain over your heart, in your chest or in your back?
9. Do you ever do things in a dream like state without remembering afterwards what you
have been doing?
10. Are you ever worried about your health?
11. Do you usually find that other people are unsympathetic about your symptoms of
trouble?
12. Are you troubled by pain or sensations that seem to move about your body?
13. Are you bothered by different aches or pains on different days?
14. Have you had periods of complete loss of memory?
15. Do you sometimes feel that people have driven you to the point of suicide?
16. Do you ever become ill before some important event or occasion so that you cannot
go through with it however much you want to?
17. Do you think that since your illness, there has been a change for the better in the way
people treat you especially those of importance to you?
18. As a result of your illness have you or has everyone else had to put off some plan or
decision about the future?
19. Has anyone you know have the same illness as you have now?
20. Do you think those nearest to you (wife, parents, etc.,), really understand how
distressed you are by your symptoms(trouble)?
“H”
1. Are you worried about having said things that have injured others?
2. Are you an unworthy person in your own eyes?
3. Have you some bodily conditions which you find disgusting?
4. Are you a condemned person because of your sins?
5. Are you troubled by waking in the early hours and being unable to get off to sleep
again( if you don’t have sleeping pills)?
6. Because of things you have done wrong, are people talking about you and criticizing
you?
7. Are you ever so low in spirits that you just sit for hours on end?
8. Do you cause harm to people because of what you are?
9. Are you ever so worked up that you pull about wringing your hands?
10. Do you ever go to bed feeling you could not care if you never wake up again?
11. Are you at your worst in the mornings and get better as the day goes on?
12. Have you lost feeling for people even those you were fond of?
TEST ANXIETY
The tool is designed to measure test anxiety and recommended for the use of high school and
college students. The test is time bound that is (8-10) minutes. It is developed by Charles D.
Spiel Berg.
The Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI) is a self-report inventory designed to measure test anxiety
(TA) as a situation-specific personality trait. The TAI consists of 20 items or statements, and
the respondents indicate on a four point scale how often they experience the feeling described
in each statement. The TAI provides a measure of total TA (TAI-T) as well as measures of
two TA components--worry (W) and emotionality (E).
Reliability: Test-retest reliabilities for TAI-T are reported for groups of high school, college,
and graduate students over time periods ranging from two weeks to six months. Reliability
was in the range of .80 to .81 for two-week to one-month periods with all groups. After six
months, the reliability was .62 for a group of high school students. The alpha coefficients for
TAI-T ranged from .92 to .96; for the subscales, alphas ranged from .83 to .91 for TAI-W,
and from .85 to .91 for TAI-E.
Validity: The relationship between the TAI and its subscales with other anxiety measures
(e.g., Sarason’s Test Anxiety Scale (TAS), Liebert & Morris’ Worry and Emotionality
Questionnaire (WEQ), the STAI State and Trait Anxiety scales, and the STAI State Anxiety
scale administered under examination stress conditions) all provide evidence of convergent
validity. The correlation between the TAI-T score and the TAS was sufficiently high (.82 to
.83) to suggest that the two scales measure essentially the same construct.
Instructions
“A number of statements which people have used to describe themselves are given below.
Read each statement and then round the appropriate number to the right of the statement to
indicate how you generally feel. There are no right or wrong answers. Do not spend too much
time on any one statement but give the answer which seems to describe how you generally
feel”.
Scoring and interpretation
The TAI (Test Anxiety Inventory) is a brief instrument occupying one side of a page on
which the 20 items are printed. The questionnaire is consisted of five point scales that are
almost never, sometimes, often, almost always. The total TAI score (TAI-T) is based on all
20 items. The scoring is done on the following basis. That is 1 for 1, 2 for 2, 3 for 3 and 4 for
4. But the first item in the inventory has a reverse score that is 1 for 4, 2 for 3, 3 for 2 and 4
for 1.
The tool also has sub scales for which 8 of the items measure the W (worry) component and 8
items measure the E (emotion). Four items that load on both subscales contribute to the TAI-
T score but are not scored on either the W or E subscales. Percentile ranks are calculated
from the raw scores. The interpretation is low score-low anxiety, high score-high anxiety and
the total score range from 20-80.
For the subscale it is calculated with the percentile score.
Directions: A number of statements which people have used to describe themselves are
given below. Read each statement and then blacken in the appropriate circle to the right
of the statement to indicate how you generally feel. There are no rights or wrong
answers. Do not spend too much time on any one statement but give the answer which
seems to describe how you generally feel.
The Achievement Motivation Scale is a self-reporting scale developed by John Ray in 1990.
It consists of 14 statements in question form demanding information for each in any of the
three options mentioned below:
• Yes
• Undecided
• No
Administration:
In administering the questionnaire, the following instructions are to be given which are as
follows:
“In the following page is given 14 statements of the shorter form of Ray’s Achievement
Motivation Scale. Three possible modes of responses are provided, such as, “yes”,
“undecided” and “no”. Read each statement carefully and mark in any one of the alternative
response modes to indicate your level of agreement with the particular content of the
statements. Do not think too much while answering any statement. Please give your
immediate response to the statement.”
Scoring Method:
Ray’s Achievement Motivation Scale is a self- reporting 3-point scale. Items of the scale are
in question form demanding information for each statement in any of the three options
mentioned below:
• Yes
• Undecided
• No
The items are so stated that if the answer is “yes” a score of 3 is given, for “undecided” a
score of 2 is given and for the negative answer “no” a score of 1 is given. For items marked
“R” the scoring have to be reversed. For example, for “yes” 1, for “undecided” 2 and for “no”
3 respectively. Therefore, higher the score on the scale, the greater is the level of
Achievement Motivation and vice versa.
Interpretation of the scores:
The interpretations for the scores are given below:
14-23 Low
24-32 Medium
33-42 High
Reliability:
The reliability co-efficient for the questionnaire was determined by Cronbach Alpha method
and was found to be 0.80, which denotes that it is highly significant.
Validity:
The validity of the questionnaire was found to be 0.75.
Ray’s Achievement Motivation Scale
5) Do you get restless and annoyed when you feel you are
wasting time?
11) Are you inclined to read off the successes of other rather
than do the work of making yourself a success?
Reliabilities :
The Trait Anxiety Scale has an alpha internal consistency-reliability coefficient of .91. The
corresponding alpha reliability coefficient for the Depression Scale is .95. Both reliability
coefficients are very high, showing that availability of a conceptual framework for each scale
was helpful in constructing short, yet highly reliable, scales.
Convergent Validity:
The Mehrabian Trait Anxiety and Depression scales were administered to a sample of 46
participants along with the Zung (1965) Depression Scale and the Spielberger, Gorsuch, and
Lushene (1970) Trait Anxiety Scale. The Mehrabian Depression Scale correlated .79 with
Zung's Scale; the Mehrabian Anxiety Scale correlated .68 with the Spielberger et al. Scale.
Both correlations were indicative of convergent validity.
Instructions :
The following instructions were given to the subjects : The Subject(s) is asked to sit
comfortably and informed “You will found below a number of phrases, you have to read each
one carefully and judge to what extent it correctly describes you, to what extent each word is
accurate or inaccurate such as if accurate means please write along side of each phrase- +4
=if extremely accurate ,+3 =if very accurate ,+2 =if moderately accurate ,+1 =if slightly
accurate ,0 =if neither accurate nor inaccurate Followed by if the words are inaccurate -1 = if
slightly inaccurate ,-2 = if moderately inaccurate ,-3 = if very inaccurate ,-4 = if extremely
inaccurate. Please don’t omit any item. There is no time limit for the test, but try to answer as
quickly as possible, there is no right or wrong answer please be frank and honest, your
answer will be treated confidential and will be used for academic purpose only.
INSTRUCTIONS
The following instructions were given for the subjects
The Subject(s) is asked to sit comfortably and informed
“You will found below a number of phrases, you have to read each one carefully and
judge to what extent it correctly describes you, to what extent each word is accurate or
inaccurate such as if accurate means please write along side of each phrase- +4 =if
extremely accurate ,+3 =if very accurate ,+2 =if moderately accurate ,+1 =if slightly
accurate ,0 =if neither accurate nor inaccurate Followed by if the words are inaccurate -1
= if slightly inaccurate ,-2 = if moderately inaccurate ,-3 = if very inaccurate ,-4 = if
extremely inaccurate. Please don’t omit any item. There is no time limit for the test, but
try to answer as quickly as possible, there is no right or wrong answer please be frank and
honest, your answer will be treated confidential and will be used for academic purpose
only.
Please rate how accurately each word, given below, describes your personal
characteristics. Enter one of the nine numbers from the following ACCURATE-
INACCURATE scale in the space provided alongside each word. Try to describe the way
you are as a person. That is, for each word, decide, just how accurately it describes you as
a person in general. +4 = extremely accurate
+3 = very accurate
+2 = moderately accurate
+1 = slightly accurate
0 = neither accurate nor inaccurate
-1 = slightly inaccurate
-2 = moderately inaccurate
-3 = very inaccurate
-4 = extremely inaccurate
I am:
______ 1. Sad and gloomy
______ 2. Happy
______ 3. Hopeless
______ 4. Feeling life is wonderful
______ 5. Satisfied with my past
______ 6. Bored
______ 7. A failure
______ 8. Enjoying life
______ 9. Useful and needed
______ 10. Lonely
______ 11. Working well and competently
______ 12. Withdrawn from others
______ 13. Energetic
______ 14. Liked by most people
______ 15. Unable to make decisions
______ 16. Feeling guilty
______ 17. Hopeful
______ 18. Tired and weak
______ 19. Thinking well and clearly
______ 20. Feeling I'd be better off dead
+4 = extremely accurate
+3 = very accurate
+2 = moderately accurate
+1 = slightly accurate
0 = neither accurate nor inaccurate
-1 = slightly inaccurate
-2 = moderately inaccurate
-3 = very inaccurate
-4 = extremely inaccurate
I am:
______ 1. Nervous
______ 2. Tense
______ 3. Relaxed
______ 4. Comfortable
______ 5. Distressed
______ 6. Upset
______ 7. At ease
______ 8. Not distracted easily
______ 9. Anxious
______ 10. Untroubled
______ 11. Worried
______ 12. Leisurely
______ 13. Fearful
______ 14. Stressed
______ 15. Secure
______ 16. Satisfied
THE ATTRIBUTION OF SUCCESS AND FAILURE INVENTORY
In administering the questionnaire, the following instructions are to be given which are as
follows:
‘Many factors contribute to the success or lack of success of people. Some of these are given
below in pairs. Please distribute FOUR points between each of the two terms of each
pair(4,0;3,1;1,3;0,4)to indicate how much you believe they contribute to success or lack of
success. There is no right or wrong answer; we are interested only in your personal opinion.’
Scoring
Scoring for the Attribution of Success and Failure Inventory is done in the following manner:
1. The response scores should be transferred to 32 items of the Inventory.
2. Once the responses have been transferred, total them.
3. After obtaining the raw scores, one has to see the corresponding Quotient value for the
Raw Scores.
The raw scores for each dimension are converted into Quotient values. The quotient ranges
from 0 – 100. Separate Quotient values are given for the eight dimensions. Higher the
Quotient, higher is the level of the individual in that particular dimension.
The reliability coefficient of the questionnaire was determined through Split half method and
was found significant at 0.01 level.
Validity:
All the variables of the Attribution of Success and Failure Inventory were correlated with the
scores on Rotter’s SRI (1954) indicating the external locus of control for a group of 164.
Thus the construct validity of attribution to internal-external and stablevariable factors as
independent constructs has been established. The co-efficient of correlation were significant
at 0.01 level.
Attribution of Success and Failure Inventory
Many factors contribute to the success or lack of success of people. Some of these are
given below in pairs. Please distribute four points between each of the two terms of
each pair (4,0; 3,1;1,3; 0,4) to indicate how much you believe they contribute to
success or lack of success. There are no right or wrong answers; we are interested
only in your personal opinion.
A. In your opinion, how much each of the two factors in each pair contributes
towards success of a person?
1a) Talent
b) Hard work
10a) Efficiency
b) Supportive team
14a) Talent
b) Affluent family
15a) Fate
b) Resources
29a) Laziness
b) Incompetent guide
31a) Fate
b) Lack of resources
Reliability and validity: The reliability and validity of CSQ were evaluated. In the study,
Cronbach's alpha was 0.80 and the coefficient of validity was 0.76. This questionnaire is a
good psychometric method of evaluating the communication skills.
Scoring: The scale has 32 items evaluated on a four point scale: Never, Occasionally,
Frequently, and Always. The responses vary from 1 (never) to 4 (always). The highest score
is 128 and the lowest is 32. High scores indicate that the individual perceives him/herself to
be competent in communication skills.
Interpretation of scores
65-97 average
98-128 high
Evaluate how well you communicate by responding to the following statements. Mark the
options that are closest to your experience. Be as honest as you can: Options
1. NEVER 2. OCCASIONALLY 3. FREQUENTLY 4. ALWAYS
1. I communicate the right message to the right person at the right time.
2. I think carefully about a message before I decide how to communicate it.
3. I project myself self – confidence and speak confidently.
4. I welcome feedback about my communication.
5. I listen intently and check I have understood before I reply.
6. I try to exclude personal prejudices of all kind when judging others.
7. I am constructive and civil when I meet others.
8. I take time to give people the information they need and want.
9. I use one – to –one meeting for reviews of performance and coaching.
10. I question people to find out what they think and how they are getting on.
11. I hand out written briefs that give all pertinent information on a task.
12. I use professional phone techniques to improve my communication.
13. I communicate via all available electronic media.
14. I apply rules of good writing to external and internal communications.
15. I use an effective system of note taking for minutes, interviews and research.
16. I test important letters and documents on reliable critics before finalizing.
17. I use fast reading techniques to speed up my work rate.
18. I prepare speeches carefully and deliver them well after rehearsal.
19. I take an active and highly visible role in internal training.
20. I plan important events, such as conferences, to high professional standards.
21. I apply the rules of soft and hard selling to put across my points of view.
22. I enter negotiations fully primed on issues and on the other side’s needs.
23. I make my reports accurate, concise and clear. And well structured.
24. I research thoroughly before putting forward a written proposal.
25. I try to understand how all relevant audiences react to the organization.
26. I consider how skilled advisers can help on public relations issues.
27. I make useful contacts with journalists and other media people.
28. I make sure specialist work such as a design is done by qualified professionals.
29. My briefs to advertising agencies are based on clearly defined business targets.
30. I give priority to communicating regularly with employees.
31. I receive and react positively to feedback from employees and others.
32. I have a strategy for communications and check activities against this plan.
THE LOCO INVENTORY
Administration
The experimenter administered the questionnaire to the employees individually for some
and in group for some.
Reliability
Split half reliability coefficient for the instrument were 0.43,0.45 and 0.55 respectively for I,
E-O, [Link], and even-odd reliability coefficients were 0’41,0.48 and 0.54
respectively.
Validity
High correlation 0.89 between levenson’s instrument and loco inventory, in a sample of
twenty-six bankers, indicates the validity of the inventory. The three measures I, EO, EC was
correlated with internality, both on rotters (1966) and valechas (1988) instruments. Three
ratios were also used from loco inventory (I/EO;I/EL; andI/EO+EL). These give the pure
forms of internality. Here the external scores are negatively correlated with Internality scored
on rotters and valechas instruments; the level of significance is higher on rotters scale. The
ratio of internality/EO and internality/total EC are significantly correlated with rotter’s
internality, although the correlation with valechas internality is not significant. These data
indicate acceptable validity of loco inventory, although further studies are desirable. Factor
analysis explained about 49%lysis of data from 328 managers belonging to a large multi
vocational public sector steel company, showed three factors and the loading of 30 Items on
the three-factors. Principle components analysis was used with equamax rotation. The three
factors explained about 49% variance. Factors 1, 2 3 are external-others and externality luck
and internality respectively. Some items have significant loadings on more than one factor.
Factor analysis construct validity of the instrument.
Scoring
The subjects are required to mark 4, 3, 2 or 1 as their responses, 4 if they think the statement
is highly relevant to them and 1 if it is least relevant. A 5-point scale is used in scoring
responses. Scoring sheet can be used to get scores on I, EO and EC. Scores on each of the
three dimensions of locus of control (internaliy, externality –o, externality-l should be
totalled; these will range from 0 to 40 for each. in order to convert then into a 100 point scale,
the total can be multiplied by 2.5.
Interpretation
Internality
_ 33 and above- very high internality, indicating that they have high self-confidence.
However they may be unrealistic sometimes in assessing the
difficulties and problems in achieving their goals.
_ 29-32- high trusts in ones ability and effort is likely to lead to effective use of
these.
_ 18-21- individual lacks self-trust and needs to take steps to examine his /her
strengths and by using feedback from others.
_ 17 or less that 17- very little confidence in their efforts and is likely to lead to
effective use of these.
External others
_ 21-29- realistic dependence
_ 17-20--independence orientation
_ 16 and less than 16 orientation of counter dependence
84
Type A/B stress test
Scoring
The questionnaire in a five point scale. Each response is assigned to particular score. The
total score is found out by adding all the corresponding scores of the response.
Interpretation
50-A+
40-50-A
30-39-A-
20-29-B+
10-19-B
Type A/B stress test
Instructions: please rate yourself on the items listed below by circling the answer that is most
true for you.
1-almost never
2-rarely
3-average
4-sometimes
5-almost always
Description of tool:
The severity of violence scale comprises two complimentary and equivalent forty six items
rating scale (Severity Violence Against Women Scales, Severity of Violence Against Men
Scales) used to determine types and severity of violence inflicted by men on women and by
women on men, in domestic relationships. This was developed by L.L MARSHALL. The
scale consists of a list of 46 acts of implied or actual violence, with respondents indicating the
frequency with which their partner engages in those threats and actions. Items are identical
for men- against-women violence and womenagainst- men violence, with the exception that
pronouns are changed. It is a 6- point scale ranging from 0 = never to 5 = A great many
times. Items are scored according to three dimensions: (1) threats if violence, (2) acts of
violence, and (3) sexual aggression. Psychometric properties: reliability and validity data are
not published, but the author indicated that alpha generally ranges from .76 to .96, although
coefficients in the .68 to .78 range have been found for sexual aggression on the Violence
Against Men Scales. Along with these questionnaire few personal information was collected
from the e participants.
Administration:
Administration SVS is quiet difficult. Questionnaire was given to the respondents in their
house. Privacy is maintained. The investigator given assurance about the confidentiality of
results.. Asked them to fill both the columns with appropriate ratings given in the
questionnaire. Asked them to fill the numbers genuinely. The examiner was satisfied that all
the columns and rows are filled and was collected.
Scoring:
Each question was coded in the dimensions of severity of violence.
Severity of Violence against Men Scales (SVAMS)
1. Threats of violence
a. Threats of mild violence: 5, 6, 7, 9, 11.
b. Threats of moderate violence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11.
c. Threats of serious violence: 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19.
2. Acts of violence
a. Mild violence violence:20, 21, 23, 27.
b. Minor violence: 24, 25, 26, 28, 34.
c. Moderate violence : 29, 30, 31, 33.
d. Serious violence: 32, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40.
3. Sexual aggression: 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 45.
Severity of Violence against Women Scales (SVAMS)
1. Threats of violence:
a. Symbolic violence:1, 2, 3, 4.
b. Threats of mild violence: 5, 6, 7, 8.
c. Threats of moderate violence: 9, 10, 11, 12.
d. Threats of serious violence: 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19.
2. Acts of violence
a. Mild violence : 20, 21, 22, 23.
b. Minor violence: 24, 25, 26, 27, 28.
c. Moderate violence: 29, 30, 31.
d. Serious viuolence: 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40.
3. Sexual aggression: 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46.
Well-Being Questionnaire
Description
The scale was used to measure the psychological well being of the orthopedically
disabled students. It was developed by Goldberg in the year 1972. The original version of
this scale contains 60 items which measures physical and psychological health. This 12 item
version exclusively measures the psychological well being of the individual. It consists of 12
items asking whether the respondent has already experiencing a particular symptom rated on
a four point rating scale. In the questionnaire the options are A, better than usual, B, same as
usual, C, less than usual, D, much less than usual. The subjects are required to give the most
appropriate response.
Administration procedure
The test retest reliability of this scale was found to be 0.95. This has been established
by banks (1980), and Khaleque and Jahen (1986). The original and subsequent studies
(Goldberg, 1978) have provided evidence of validity of General Health Questionnaire – 12 as
shown by its linear association with independent clinical assessment.
Scoring
Interpretation
Here below are given some questions. You are requested to give your True and Frank
answers to them against each question there are four responses. Indicate your most
appropriate answer with tick mark.
1. In the last few weeks have you been able to concentrate on whatever you are
doing?
a) Better than usual b) Same as usual
c) Less than usual d) Much less than usual
2. In the last few weeks have you lost much sleep over worry?
a) Not at all b) No more than usual
c) Rather more than usual c) Much more than usual
3. In the last few weeks have you felt you are playing a useful part in things?
a) More than usual b) same as usual
c) Less than usual c) Much less than usual
4. In the last few weeks have you felt that you are capable of making decision about
things?
a) More than usual b) same as usual
c) Less than usual c) Much less than usual
5. In the last few weeks have you felt constantly under strain?
a) Not at all b) No more than usual
c) Rather more than usual c) Much more than usual
6. In the last few weeks have you felt you could not overcome your difficulties?
a) Not at all b) No more than usual
c) Rather more than usual c) Much more than usual
7. In the last few weeks have you been able to enjoy your normal day-to-day
activities?
a) More than usual b) same as usual
c) Less than usual c) Much less than usual
8. In the last few weeks have you been able to face up your problems?
a) More than usual b) same as usual
c) Less than usual c) Much less than usual
9. In the last few weeks have you been feeling unhappy and depressed?
a) Not at all b) No more than usual
c) Rather more than usual c) Much more than usual
10. In the last few weeks have you been losing confidence in yourself?
a) Not at all b) No more than usual
c) Rather more than usual c) Much more than usual
11. In the last few weeks have you been thinking of yourself as a worthless person?
a) Not at all b) No more than usual
c) Rather more than usual c) Much more than usual
12. In the last few weeks have you been feeling reasonably happy all things
considered?
a) More than usual b) same as usual
c) Less than usual c) Much less than usual
WORK LOCUS OF CONTROL SCALE
Paul E. Spector
Description of the tool: The Work Locus of Control Scale (WLCS) is a 16 item instrument
designed to assess control beliefs in the workplace. It is a domain specific locus of control
scale that correlates about .50 to .55 with general locus of control. The format is summated
rating with six response choices: disagree very much, disagree moderately, disagree slightly,
agree slightly, agree moderately, agree very much, and scored from 1 to 6, respectively.
Total score is the sum of all items, and ranges from 16 to 96. The scale has been shown to
relate to several work variables, including job performance and job satisfaction. It also relates
to counterproductive behaviour and organizational commitment.
Administration of the tool: The following instructions are given. “This scale studies your
beliefs about your present job. Here is a list of statements, and you will have to mark your
appropriate answer on a six point scale ranging from strongly disagreeing to agreeing very
much. Please be frank and honest. There is no right or wrong answers.
Reliability and Validity: Internal consistency (coefficient alpha) generally ranges from .80
to .85 in the English language version. Test-retest reliability for a year was reported as .57 by
Bond & Bunce (2003) and .60 by Moyle (see Moyle, 1995).
Scoring method: The Work Locus of Control Scale or WLCS has half of its items written in
each direction--external and internal. Scores on the scale can range from 16 to 96. Each item
can have a score from 1 to 6 if original response choices are used. High scores on the scale
represent externality, so the scores on the internally worded items must be reversed before
summing. This is because a score of 6 representing strongest possible agreement on an
externally worded item is equivalent to a score of 1 representing strongest possible
disagreement on an internally worded item. Below is the step by step procedure for scoring.
2. The internally worded items should be reverse scored. Below are the reversals for the
original item score in the left column and reversed item score in the right. The rightmost
values should be substituted for the leftmost. This can also be accomplished by subtracting
the original values for the internal items from 7.
1 = 6; 2 = 5; 3 = 4; 4 = 3; 5 = 2; 6 = 1
5. If some items are missing you must make an adjustment otherwise the score will be too
low. The best procedure is to compute the mean score per item for the individual, and
substitute that mean for missing items. For example, if a person does not make a response to
1 item, take the total from step 4, divide by the number answered or 15, and substitute this
number for the missing item by adding it to the total from step 4. An easier but less accurate
procedure is to substitute a middle response for the missing items. Since the center of the
scale is between 3 and 4, either number could be used. Usually one would alternate the two
numbers as missing items occur.
WORK MOTIVATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Agarwal
RELIABILITY:
Internal Consistency of the instrument was found out by split-half method.
The reliability co-efficient by Spearman Brown formula was very high i.e. .994.
VALIDITY:
Face Validity: Face validity was computed by circulating the questionnaire
among 22 judges who were all practicing psychologists. Using a 5-point scale judges rated 24
items.
Item Validity: In order to find out the item validity, item correlations with
total work motivation score were computed. All the items had high co-efficient of correlation
with the total score significant beyond 1% level of confidence.
Factorial Validity: In order to find out the factorial validity all the items were
factor analyzed using principal component method.
SCORING METHOD:
All the items were liker types which were rated on five points scale. Since the
items were liker type, summated scoring is done by assigning 5 to most positive response and
1 to the extreme negative response.
The Responses are marked as;
a–5
b–4
c–3
d–2
e–1
INTERPRETATION:
Total attainable range of score is 0 – 130.
0 – 26 Low Motivational Level
27 – 104 Moderate Motivational Level
105 – 130 High Motivational Level
QUESTIONIRE
1. All in all how satisfied are you with your job?
a. Very satisfied with my job.
b. Fairly satisfied.
c. Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied.
d. Somewhat dissatisfied.
e. Very dissatisfied with my job.
2. Considering your skills and efforts you put into the job; how satisfied are you with
your pay?
a. Very satisfied with my pay.
b. Fairly satisfied with my pay.
c. Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with my pay.
d. Somewhat dissatisfied with my pay.
e. Very dissatisfied with my pay.
3. How do you feel about the way tea breaks, lunch breaks, hours of work and the like
are handled in your office?
a. I am Very satisfied.
b. Somewhat satisfied.
c. Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied.
d. Somewhat dissatisfied.
e. I am Very dissatisfied.
4. How much satisfied do you feel about your chances of promotion in your
organization?
a. Completely satisfied.
b. Fairly satisfied.
c. A Little satisfied.
d. Somewhat dissatisfied.
e. I am Very dissatisfied.
5. How do you feel about your organization employees benefits as compared with those
in other similar organization?
a. I am Very satisfied.
b. Somewhat satisfied.
c. Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied.
d. Somewhat dissatisfied.
e. I am Very dissatisfied.
6. How do you like the kind of work you do in your organization?
a. It is exactly a kind of work I like best.
b. I like it very much.
c. It is alright.
d. I do not like it very much.
e. I dislike it very much.
7. How do people work here your organization?
a. To keep their job, make money, get promoted, do a satisfying job and because
other people in their work group except.
b. To keep their job, make money, get promoted, and for satisfaction of job well
done.
c. To keep their jobs, make money, and to get promoted.
d. To keep their job and make money.
e. Just to keep their job and for not being chewed out.
8. Are there things about working here (people, policies or conditions) that discourage
you from working here?
a. Not practically anything around here encourages me to work here.
b. Not most around here encourage to work here.
c. About as many things discourage me as encourage me.
d. Yes, great many things around here discourage me from working here.
e. Yes, but practically everything around here encourages me from working here.
9. To what extent does your job give you a chance to use your best abilities to do things
you are best at?
a. To a very great extent
b. To a considerable extent.
c. To some extent.
d. To a very little extent.
e. Not at all.
10. To what extent does your work here help you learn more about your profession or
occupation?
a. To a very great extent
b. To a great extent.
c. To some extent.
d. To a very little extent.
e. Not at all.
11. If you had a chance to do some kind of work for same pay in another organization,
would you stay here?
a. I would stay in this organization.
b. I would stay if things seem to change here.
c. I can’t stay.
d. I would prefer to go if conditions are better in other organization.
e. I would prefer to go to the other organization.
12. To what extent the people who make decisions are aware of problems at lower levels
in the organization?
a. To a very great extent
b. To a considerable extent.
c. To some extent.
d. To a very little extent.
e. Not at all.
13. Do you agree that the work-assignments are well planned in your organization?
a. Extremely well planned.
b. Very well planned.
c. Fairly well planned.
d. Not too well planned.
e. Not well planned.
14. To what extent do people in your work group show you how to improve your
performance?
a. To a very great extent
b. To a considerable extent.
c. To some extent.
d. To a very little extent.
e. Not at all.
15. How often your immediate superior talks to you in the appreciates, encourages way?
a. Always.
b. Most of the time.
c. Sometimes.
d. A few times.
e. Never.
16. How often your immediate superior talks to you in giving direction and suggestions?
a. Always.
b. Most of the time.
c. Sometimes.
d. A few times.
e. Never.
17. How often your immediate superior talks to you in the way of criticizes and refuse to
help?
a. Always.
b. Most of the time.
c. Sometimes.
d. A few times.
e. Never.
18. How often your immediate superior talks to you in the way of harasses asks for
explanation?
a. Always.
b. Most of the time.
c. Sometimes.
d. A few times.
e. Never.
19. To what extent do you have confidence and trust in the people in your work group?
a. To a very great extent
b. To a considerable extent.
c. To some extent.
d. To a very little extent.
e. Not at all.
20. How free do you feel to discuss your personal problems with your immediate
superior?
a. I always feel free to discuss.
b. I usually feel free.
c. Sometimes I feel free.
d. Only once a while
e. Never feel free.
21. Suppose you were having some sort of difficulty in your job. To what extent do you
feel your immediate superior would be willing to go out of way help you if you ask
for it?
a. To a very great extent
b. To a considerable extent.
c. To some extent.
d. To a very little extent.
e. Not at all.
22. To what extent do the members of staff in your work group make an effort to avoid
creating problems or interference?
a. To a very great extent
b. To a great extent.
c. To some extent.
d. To a very little extent.
e. Not at all.
23. How much satisfied do you feel with the recognition your work gets?
a. Very satisfied
b. Fairly satisfied
c. Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
d. Somewhat satisfied.
e. Very dissatisfied.
24. To what extent do you feel you are responsible for your work?
a. To a very great extent
b. To a great extent.
c. To some extent.
d. To a little extent.
e. Not at all.
25. To what extent do you feel free to plan your own work?
a. To a very great extent
b. To a great extent.
c. To some extent.
d. To a little extent.
e. Not at all.
26. To what extent do you feel you are doing useful work here?
a. To a very great extent
b. To a great extent.
c. To some extent.
d. To a little extent.
e. Not at all.
Mental health assessments, such as the PGI Health Questionnaire, are significant in predicting potential psychiatric symptoms as they provide a structured method to identify symptoms early. High scores often indicate susceptibility to psychiatric issues, emphasizing the need for proactive mental health interventions and monitoring .
The PGI Health Questionnaire evaluates psychological distress through Section B, which includes items assessing symptoms like crying easily, losing interest in activities, and feeling depressed or absent-minded. A higher score on this section usually indicates greater chances of developing psychiatric symptoms, necessitating psychiatric help and follow-up care .
Self-evaluations have profound implications on how individuals perceive their social interactions and relationships. Positive self-evaluations are linked to more confident and fulfilling interactions, as individuals feel valued and validated, whereas negative self-evaluations can lead to social withdrawal and relationship difficulties due to perceived inadequacies .
The Job Satisfaction Scale suggests that favoritism is negatively perceived within organizations, and its presence can significantly reduce employee satisfaction. The absence of favoritism is indicative of a fair work environment, which contributes positively to job satisfaction .
The Job Satisfaction Scale measures the level of job satisfaction among individuals through a series of 25 statements, which are evaluated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. A high score on this scale indicates dissatisfaction with one's job, as the scores are summed and high scores are associated with dissatisfaction .
A sense of achievement and competence is closely related to higher self-esteem, as individuals who view themselves as capable and successful tend to have more positive evaluations of self-worth. This is reflected in personal evaluations where individuals report satisfaction with their talents and abilities .
The PGI Health Questionnaire is composed of two main sections: 'A' that assesses physical distress and 'B' that evaluates psychological distress, with 16 and 22 items respectively. Its reliability was established using the 'test-retest' method and the 'split half' method, resulting in high reliability scores of 0.88 and 0.86 .
Self-concept inventories measure variations in self-regard by presenting a balanced mix of positively and negatively phrased statements that assess one's self-evaluation. The acceptance of any statement indicates a positive self-regard, and the scale is sensitive to individual differences as it reflects one's attitudes towards various personal attributes .
In the PGI Health Questionnaire, communication and feedback play critical roles in shaping behavior. The ability to express opinions, understand criticism, and observe feedback helps individuals adapt their behavior effectively, which is crucial for psychological well-being and social interactions .
Self-esteem is evaluated using a questionnaire that consists of 10 statements, with responses rated from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Scores range from 0-10 indicating low self-esteem, 10-20 average self-esteem, and 20-30 high self-esteem .