Revocation of Election Established by the US Congress

LAWFUL LEGAL NOTICE. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS AN IRS FILING.

Please adjust your actions, your agents’ actions, as well as the actions of any directly or indirectly affiliated
agencies offices, officials, departments, divisions, contractors, subcontractors, nominees,
successors, assigns, third parties and all other cooperating agencies present and future accordingly.
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT; NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

The purpose of this Statement of Facts is related to the option provided by the US Congress
providing an American National to terminate the former sub silentio 'voluntary election'.
________________________________________________________________________
NOTE: For purposes of this document, the use of the term 'American National' is a non-statutory phrase
created to eliminate confusion with the statutory term "U.S. Citizen" as referenced in various sections of Title
26. It means those born in one of the 50 states of the Union, those born to parents of which at least one of
them were born in the 50 states, or those naturalized into the Constitutional Republic. The term “American
National” is synonymous with the statutory term “national’ defined in Section 101(a)(21) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (INA) and in 8 U.S. Code § 1101(a)(21). Additionally, a “national” status individual is
deceptively identified as Nonresident Alien Individuals in Title 26 Statutes and Regulations.
________________________________________________________________________

Foundational Basis for Revocation of Election

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

The United States Supreme Court stipulated in Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281 (1949)
that:

"The cannon of construction which teaches that legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to
apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States is a valid approach whereby unexpressed
congressional intent may be ascertained. It is based on the assumption that Congress is primarily concerned
with domestic conditions."

West Law provided the following summary of the Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Filardo case: “It is a well-established
principle of law that all federal regulations [and statutes] apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the
United States [the District of Columbia] unless a contrary intent appears [meaning if implementing regulations
are published in the Federal Register].” [Clarifications added]

The Internal Revenue Service operates under Title 26 [the Internal Revenue Code] statutory laws and its lesser
known Administrative, Procedural, and Implementing Regulations regarding federal income taxation found in
Title 26 Code of Federal Regulations. These federal statutes and regulations used by the Internal Revenue
Service are applicable only within the territorial and legislative jurisdiction of the District of Columbia
per the US Supreme Court.

Thus, the IRS statutes and regulations are specifically limited in their geographical jurisdiction as well
as the legislative jurisdiction for the application toward those who are the proper federal 'Taxpayers' as
expressed in the IRC at 26 USC §7701 (a) (14). The limited geographical and legislative jurisdiction for IRS

Page 1 of 13
statutes and regulations is restricted to the District of Columbia by the Legislative Intent of the 16th
Amendment.

Statutory 'Taxpayers' are defined to mean "any person subject to any internal revenue tax." The statutory
term 'person' as defined at 26 USC §7701 (a)(1) refers only to statutory legal fictions created by and under
the dominion of the US Congress. The statutory term, 'subject to', means 'under the dominion and control
of the National Government'.

Established by the Constitution, the American People are the sovereign. As such the United States Supreme
Court has declared in Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886) that:

"Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to the law for it is the author and source of the law."

It is therefore an imperative necessity to include the statement of legal opinion expressed by the United States
Supreme Court in United States v. Cooper Corporation, 312 U.S. 600 (1941) in which this Court stated:

"Since in common usage, the term person does not include the sovereign, statutes employing the phrase are ordinarily
construed to exclude it."

Thus, the statutory definition of 'person' found in 26 USC §7701(a)(1) and referred to in the statutory
definition of Taxpayer at 26 USC §7701(a) (14) does not reflect or include in any fashion a reference to
American Nationals who are the identified Sovereigns by birth in one of the 50 states of the Union, those
naturalized, or from parents who were born there.

Internal Revenue Service

Let it be known that the Internal Revenue Service, a federal bureau headquartered in Washington, DC, has
promulgated in Title 26 of the United States Code [USC] a statutory legal option for those who are
Nonresident Alien Individuals to implement the Termination at their discretion for any voluntary Federal
Income Tax Election established at 26 USC §6013 (g) [Election to treat nonresident alien individual as
resident of the United States].

Once a statutory 'election' under 26 USC §6013 (g) or (h) was initially established, those Nonresident Alien
Individuals who made that 'election' immediately became a federal statutory 'Taxpayer' and their former
nontaxable income is then deemed taxable in an identical manner to that of a US Resident Alien. The 'election'
also became automatically applicable for all taxable years following as stated at 26 USC §6013 (g) (3)
Duration of Election.

The Nonresident Alien Individual thus became 'voluntarily liable 'via this 'election' for a tax never levied
upon them and their entire private sector employer paid wages were taxed under Chapter 24 of the Internal
Revenue Code. This wage withholding taxation was also automatically applicable for all taxable years
following the initial 'election' as part of the Duration of Election section at 26 USC §6013 (g) (3).

The statutory term Nonresident Alien Individual is defined at 26 USC §7701 (b)(1)(B) and is expressed in
this statute in the following manner: [definition is available at
[Link]

"An Individual is a Nonresident Alien if such individual is neither a [statutory] citizen of the United
States [District of Columbia per 26 USC §7408(d)] nor a resident [Alien or foreigner from another nation] of
the United States [District of Columbia per 26 USC §7408(d)]." [Emphasis & Clarification added]

Page 2 of 13
What is immediately noticeable is that the definition only tells the reader what a Nonresident Alien
Individual is not rather than what it is. Such purposeful obfuscation is vitally important to recognize.

The true meaning of the statutory term Nonresident Alien Individual is none other than American
Nationals who were born in one of the 50 states of the Union [the Constitutional Republic]. This is amply
illustrated in reading 26 CFR 1.871-1 (b) (4) Expatriation to avoid tax. This regulation section reads as
follows:

"For special rules applicable in determining the tax of a nonresident alien individual who has lost
U.S. citizenship with a principal purpose of avoiding certain taxes, see section 877."

In regard to Expatriation, only American Nationals [those born in one of the 50 states of the Union] can
give up their Constitutional U.S. citizenship status and become a former member of the Constitutional
Republic. Therefore, the term 'Nonresident Alien Individual' and 'American National' are synonymous.

The Legislative Intent of the 16th Amendment to the Constitution, written by former President of the
United States [POTUS] William H. Taft documents that Congress was only able to levy the Federal
Income Tax upon the National Government itself. Therefore, American Nationals who choose to work
for the National Government are the primary statutory 'Taxpayers'. The Internal Revenue Code is only
applicable in the District of Columbia & US Territories for those born there, those who work for the National
Government, and those who are US Resident Aliens.

Former POTUS Taft stipulated in the foundational document, the Legislative Intent of the 16th Amendment,
that:
"The decision of the Supreme Court [Pollock v Farmer's Loan & Trust Company, 157 U.S. 429, 1895] in
the income tax case deprived the National Government of a power which, by reason of previous decisions of the
court, it was generally supposed that government had.

I therefore recommend to the Congress that both Houses, by a two-thirds vote, shall propose an amendment to the
Constitution conferring the power to levy an income tax upon the National Government without
apportionment among the States in proportion to population."

The power to ignore the Constitution only exists in a jurisdiction in which the Constitution does not
apply...the only jurisdiction is the 10-mile square area referred to in the Constitution as “the District
of Columbia.”

Nonresident Alien Individuals [American Nationals] are only liable for the Federal Income Tax if they
choose to make a statutory 'election' [described at 26 CFR 1.871-1(a) Classification of Aliens] by filing a
Form 1040 US Individual Income Tax Return for a tax they never were made liable for prior to the
'election'. Per Clark v. United States, 95 U.S. 539, a statutory 'election' is not a valid contract.

Via 26 USC §6013(g) this statutory 'election' allows the National Government to treat or tax the income
of those never imposed with the Federal Income Tax. American Nationals a.k.a. Nonresident Alien
Individuals are then treated identically to that of foreigners who are legal Taxpayers called US Resident Aliens
who live and work in one of the 50 states of the Union [the Constitutional Republic] or the District of Columbia.

The Lack of Tax Liability and the right of Nonresident Alien Individuals to choose not to make an
'election' were established by the Legislative Intent of the 16th Amendment written by former POTUS William
H. Taft on June 16, 1909. American Nationals have always been Lawful Non-Taxpayers as they were
excluded. This foundational document which clears up the question of just who the parties are that the Federal
Income Tax has actually been levied upon was promulgated in the Congressional Record of the United States

Page 3 of 13
Senate on pages 3344-3345. The federal income tax was only levied upon the National Government. It also
ignored the Rule of Apportionment, a mandatory requirement in the Constitution, further pinpointing the only
operational jurisdiction to be the District of Columbia and US Territories.

The Federal Income Tax was only levied upon the National Government which is to say those Americans
who have chosen to work for the National Government in one of its myriad of Public Offices. "Performing
the functions of a public office" which is the statutory definition of a 'Trade or Business' per 26 USC §7701
(a) (26).

Within the regulations used by the Internal Revenue Service, one can locate the voluntary nature of Nonresident
Alien Individuals [meaning American Nationals] being offered the option or choice to make an 'election' or not.
By the fact that the 'election' is a voluntary choice, the option to Americans has not been broadcast to
the American Public. The voluntary choice to make an election or not, illustrates that the National
Government has been successful in burdening Americans with an obligation that was never imposed by law
outside of making an 'election'.

26 CFR 1.871-1 Classification and manner of taxing alien individuals is the regulation in particular that
demonstrates the voluntary nature for American Nationals to exercise the choice to make an 'election' to have
their income taxed or treated like that of a Resident Alien.

26 CFR 1.871-1 (a) Classes of aliens, states:

"For purposes of the income tax, alien individuals are divided generally into two classes, namely,
resident aliens and nonresident aliens. Resident alien individuals are, in general, taxable the same
as [statutory] citizens [legal fictions] of the United States; that is, a resident alien is taxable on income
derived from all sources, including sources without the United States. See § 1.1-1(b).

Nonresident alien individuals are taxable only on certain income from sources within the United
States and on the income described in section 864(c)(4) from sources without the United States
which is effectively connected for the taxable year with the conduct of a trade or business in the
United States [meaning only the District of Columbia per 26 USC §7408(d)].

However, nonresident alien individuals [American Nationals] may elect, under section 6013 (g) or
(h), to be treated as U.S. residents for purposes of determining their income tax liability under
Chapters 1, 5, and 24 [wage withholding] of the code." [Emphasis & Clarifications added]
The last paragraph above shows that Nonresident Alien Individuals or rather American Nationals are
offered the choice by use of the statutory expression "may elect" to have their income treated [taxed] as that
of a U.S. resident alien. The expression "may elect" clearly signifies that there is no mandatory obligation
to file a Form 1040 US Individual Income Tax Return or pay that tax.

The lack of a mandatory obligation to file a Form 1040 return and pay the Federal Income Tax is further
substantiated by the United States Department of the Treasury.

United States Department of the Treasury

As previously stated, those who work for the National Government have been lawfully levied with the
federal income tax per the Legislative Intent of the 16th Amendment. The Legislative Intent excludes

Page 4 of 13
American Nationals from the federal income tax. Thus, sub silentio the 'election' amounts to a 'gift or
bequest' as it was never mandatory.

Yet we see that the US Department of the Treasury states the federal income tax is a 'gift or bequest'
indicating a matter of choice for American Nationals a.k.a. Nonresident Alien Individuals to 'donate' a 'gift
or bequest' to and for the use of the National Government -- or to freely ignore making a donation.

The existence of both Lawful Taxpayers established via the Legislative Intent of the 16th Amendment and
Lawful Non-Taxpayers American Nationals excluded by the Legislative Intent of the 16th Amendment is
dramatically evident.

31 USC §321 (d)(1) & (d)(2) clearly illustrates that the Federal Income Tax is considered and acknowledged
by the US Department of the Treasury to be a 'gift or bequest’ that is paid for the expressed purpose and use
of the [statutory]United States. Here is the exact statutory statement by the US Department of the Treasury
as promulgated in the United States Code, Title 31.

31 USC §321 (d)(1) & (d)(2):

(1) The Secretary of the Treasury may accept, hold, administer, and use gifts and bequests of property, both
real and personal, for the purpose of aiding or facilitating the work of the Department of the Treasury.
Gifts and bequests of money and the proceeds from sales of other property received as gifts or bequests shall be
deposited in the Treasury in a separate fund and shall be disbursed on order of the Secretary of the
Treasury. Property accepted under this paragraph, and the proceeds thereof, shall be used as nearly as possible in
accordance with the terms of the gift or bequest.

(2) For purposes of the Federal income, estate, and gift taxes, property accepted under paragraph (1) shall be considered
as a gift or bequest to or for the use of the United States.

Let it further be known that the expression by the U.S. Department of the Treasury reference to the
statutory term "United States" in 31 USC §321 (d)(2) means and references only the National Government
in the District of Columbia and not the 50 states of the Union per 26 USC §7408(d).

The IRS statutes refer only to the statutory United States being the District of Columbia unless a
statutory section specifically refers to the "50 states". The statute section reflecting this fact is 26 USC
§7408(d).

26 USC §7408 (d) Citizens and residents outside the United States
If any citizen or resident of the United States does not reside in, and does not have his principal
place of business in, any United States judicial district, such citizen or resident shall be treated for
purposes of this section as residing in the District of Columbia.

The above IRS statute in Title 26 acknowledges the limited geographical and legislative jurisdiction for the
application of the federal income tax to be only the District of Columbia and other US Territories and
possessions of the National Government. It entirely excludes any reference to the Constitutional Republic, the
50 states of the Union.

Page 5 of 13
 Stipulation of Facts established by the National
Government for American Nationals such as
________________________

REVOCATION OF ELECTION
[A] All federal income taxation statutes and regulations apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of
the District of Columbia, the seat of the National Government also known as the statutory 'United
States', unless directly stated otherwise.

[B] Sovereign American Nationals are not subject to the statutes and regulations, particularly
Title 26, as they are limited in their geographical and legislative application to the District of Columbia as
"sovereigns are the author and source of the law” according to the United States Supreme Court in
Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886).

[C] The statutory definition of person used in statutes within the Internal Revenue Code of 1954
currently in use today in the territorial jurisdiction of the District of Columbia do not include or make
reference to American Nationals as a result of the territorial limitations placed against the National
Government per the Constitution. Such statutory words or phrases that illustrate this fact are highlighted
in part as follows.

(1) Person - defined at 26 USC §7701(a)(1) only referencing statutory legal fictions

(2) U.S. person - defined at 26 USC §7701(a) (30) only referencing statutory legal fictions

(3) Taxpayer - defined at 26 USC §7701(a) (14) references any 'person' subject to

(4) U.S. Citizen - defined at 8 USC §1401(a)(1) only referencing a statutory legal fiction that
was legislatively born in the District of Columbia and are property of the National
Government and thus under the dominion or control of the National Government within its
limited geographical and legislative jurisdiction. This is clearly illustrated in 3C Am Jur 2d
Section 2689 for US Citizens.

[D] As a result of the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. Cooper Corporation,
312 U.S. 600 (1941) states that "the term 'person' does not include the sovereign and that statutes
not employing the phrase are ordinarily construed to exclude it [the sovereign]."

The statutory term 'Nonresident Alien Individual' obtusely defined at 26 USC §7701 (b)(1)(B) was
purposely stated in vague terms as it addresses sovereign American Nationals as the target of that
definition without reference to the term sovereign specifically.

[E] The Implementing Regulation 26 CFR §1.871-1(a) makes reference that Nonresident Alien
Individuals can only be liable for the statutory laws of the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia if they
choose to work for the National Government. Therefore, only federal workers derive income that is
effectively connected with the conduct of a statutory 'trade or business' within the District of
Columbia.

Page 6 of 13
[F] The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution outlaws and prohibits slavery and
involuntary servitude in the Constitutional Republic. It however, does not outlaw voluntary indentured
servitude. The National Government has utilized sub silentio acts directed at American Nationals to
induce them by prevailing social custom and lack of awareness of the facts established by law to draw into
their jurisdiction such American Nationals.

(1) 26 CFR §1.871-1(a) reflects the deception by the use of a statutory 'election' of a voluntary
nature in order to make American Nationals liable for the federal income tax when the National
Government was denied and deprived of such power by the United States Supreme Court in
Pollock v. Farmer's Loan & Trust Company, 157 U.S. 429 (1895).

(2) The Legislative Intent of the Sixteenth Amendment written by former POTUS William H.
Taft on June 16, 1909, documents the limited jurisdiction for the National Government to levy
the federal income tax only upon itself. The federal income tax cannot and does not extend
into the jurisdiction of the current 50 states of the Union. By ignoring the Rule of
Apportionment, the only operational jurisdiction for application of the federal income tax is the
District of Columbia and US Territories.

[G] As evidence that the National Government cannot keep sovereign American Nationals so entrapped
by the use of a statutory 'election' created by filing of a federal income tax return in perpetuity, the
National Government has devised in its statutes a path for American Nationals referred to by the National
Government as Nonresident Alien Individuals to exit, depart, and terminate forever the federal income tax
scheme by use of 26 USC §6013(g)(4)(A) Termination of Election by Taxpayer.

[H] The United States Department of the Treasury, an agency of the National Government, is directly
complicit in the statutory election scheme as stipulated in its statutes at 31 USC §321 (d)(1) and (d)(2) by
clearly stating the federal income tax is nothing more than a "gift or bequest" of personal property
[money] of an American National "to and for the use of the United States [meaning the National
Government]".

This statement eliminates the exposure of the National Government to legal action against the
government by making the 'election' voluntary and then declaring that the money paid for the tax is
nothing but a "gift or bequest" at the same time.

[I] The National Government’s use of statutory words is purposely obtuse for many sovereign American
Nationals not trained in the art of legalese. The statutes are written in such a manner to allow the
American Nationals to by default use their own definition of non-statutory words to be misinterpreted as
having the same meaning as to what the National Government defines their statutory words to mean.

This presumption has proven to be a successful ruse by those in government who are willing to entrap
their countrymen.

[J] As a result of the convoluted semantic gamesmanship of words defined by the U.S. Congress the
path to escape the entanglement of American Nationals into being identified statutorily as "Taxpayers" of
the federal income tax was discovered at 26 USC §6013 (4)(A). This Revocation of Election is now
implemented by ________________ in order to extricate himself forever from any obligation created by
the former sub silentio election.

[K] The existence of lawful Non-Taxpayers as related to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 is
described in two specific federal documents.

Page 7 of 13
(1) The Legislative Intent of the Sixteenth Amendment, written by former POTUS William H.
Taft on June 16, 1909, was promulgated in the Congressional Record of the United States Senate
on pages 3344-3345. This foundational document proves that the federal income tax as we
know it today was never lawfully designed to be levied upon American Nationals, in fact
the power of the National Government to do so was specifically denied to the
government. American Nationals were protected from the National Government attempting to
include them as being the subject and the object of those federal statutory and regulatory laws.

(2) Economy Plumbing & Heating v. U.S., 470 F2d. (1972) in which this appellate court
declared the existence of two groups related to the federal income tax. Those groups are
taxpayers and lawful non-taxpayers. Those American Nationals, the lawful Non-Taxpayers, were
stated by this federal court to be neither the subject nor the object of federal revenue laws.

Page 8 of 13
Let it be lawfully established by the presentment of this Personal Testimony that ________________
expresses his desire to formally terminate the former statutory Election via:

REVOCATION OF ELECTION
Information about submitter of this Revocation of Election is as follows:

Name: ______________________________
Address: _________________________
SSN: ______________
DOB: __________
Grounds for the request: My constitutional right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, privacy, respect, the
fruits of my common right labors under common law, and the right to own and control property (including
labor and the fruits of my labor) without any interference from government, or requirement to report, account
for, such income or assets on such property.

Revocation by Taxpayer [Nonresident Alien Individual meaning American National] who by a prior sub
silentio government act made an 'election' to have their earnings treated or taxed like that of a Resident Alien,
now expressly states the desire to lawfully terminate or end the prior election via the statutory process
of Revocation of Election.

26 USC §6013(g)(4) addresses Termination of Election with a pertinent section at 26 USC §6013(g)(4)(A)
Revocation by taxpayer. This statutory section stipulates that, “An election under this subsection shall
terminate at the earliest of the following times". The 'earliest' time means 2 nanoseconds after IRS receipt
of Affidavit.
__________________ does hereby expressly state his desire to Terminate the Election made years ago
via the congressionally created statute(s) in 26 USC §6013(g). Even though the statutory election was never
stated openly prior to that election, his desire to ‘Terminate the Election’ is now clearly stated to those
appropriate IRS operational personnel, IRS management, IRS Chief Legal Counsel, and the IRS Commissioner.

As stipulated at 26 USC §6013(g)(4)(A), he now declares forevermore that he has exercised the option to
Terminate the Election and upon receipt is no longer identified as one taxable like a Resident Alien.
According to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 statutes promulgated at 26 USC §6013(g)(6) Only one election,
one finds expressed in this particular statute that if any election under this subsection is terminated under
paragraph (4) Termination of Election (A) Revocation by taxpayers, that such individual(s) shall be ineligible to
make an election under this subsection for any subsequent taxable year. Thus, once a Termination of Election
occurs, which is the purpose of this Testimony properly submitted to the IRS Commissioner, et al; that
_______________________ can never again make an 'election' to become a taxpayer in the future.

Page 9 of 13
 Federal Appeals Court 2nd Circuit
The federal court decision in Economy Plumbing & Heating v. U.S., 470 F2d. (1972) stated the
existence of both Lawful Taxpayers and Lawful Non-Taxpayers.

“Revenue Laws relate to taxpayers and not to non-taxpayers. The latter are without their
scope. No procedures are prescribed for non-taxpayers and no attempt is made to annul any
of their Rights or Remedies in due course of law. With them [Non-taxpayers] Congress does
not assume to deal and they are neither of the subject nor of the object of federal revenue
laws.” [Emphasis & Clarification added]
_________________ now reaffirms the desire and expressed intent to revert back to his rightful status of an
American National who is "neither of the subject nor of the object of federal revenue laws."

Page 10 of 13
 Let it be established by this Testimony the express purpose of
REVOCATION OF ELECTION
[1] _______________________ is a sovereign American National and became so by;

(i) Birth in one of the 50 states of the Union,

(ii) Birth to one or both parents who were born in the 50 states of the Union, or
(iii) Naturalization

[2] He is NOT 'subject to' the territorial jurisdiction of the statutory United States [the District of
Columbia] as a result of birth in one of the 50 states of the Union [the Constitutional Republic].

(i) He is an American National who is nonresident, geographically and statutorily speaking,

to the District of Columbia. He is also alien to the legislative jurisdiction of the US Congress
who creates Legislative Acts without direct reference to the actual jurisdiction. Congressional laws
are of limited jurisdiction. The Supreme Court declared, "...all federal statutes and regulations
applies only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States [the District of Columbia]
unless a contrary intent appears."

[3] He is a sovereign American National is not subject to the statutory laws promulgated for use in
the exclusive and limited jurisdiction of the District of Columbia, the seat of the National
Government. Furthermore, being a sovereign American National he is not referenced or included in
any statutory laws related to the federal income tax created by the U.S. Congress.

[4] He cannot be compelled, goaded, or presumed to associate with the National Government which
would be a direct violation of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and the Thirteenth
Amendment to the Constitution outlawing slavery and involuntary servitude in the 50 states.

[5] The Legislative Intent of the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution clearly states that the
Federal Income Tax was only levied upon the National Government [meaning those who choose to
work for it]. The narrow jurisdictional application of the Federal Income Tax is evident due to the
Amendment referring that it does not require adherence to the Constitutional Requirement of
Apportionment based on Census as would be required of any direct tax.

(i) The Congressional Act of the Sixteenth Amendment avoids this limitation in the
Constitution by only applying the Amendment to the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia, the
statutory United States. The Legislative Intent of the 16th Amendment acknowledges that former
POTUS William H. Taft on June 16, 1909 recognized this territorial limitation for the levy of the
federal income tax. The Legislative Intent of the 16th Amendment can be located in the
Congressional Record of the United States Senate on pages 3344-3345.

[6] He does NOT derive any income that is "effectively connected with the conduct of a statutory 'Trade or
Business' within the District of Columbia". _____________________ has no physical or statutory
federal domicile within the District of Columbia.

[7] The National Government, and its bureau - the Internal Revenue Service - lacks both geographical
and legislative jurisdiction to apply the federal income tax upon __________________. American
Nationals, according to the Legislative Intent of the 16th Amendment, the US Supreme Court and the
Office of the Federal Register, and the enacted federal tax laws presented have never been made liable for
the federal income tax by enacted federal law except via the sub silentio 'election' based on presumptions
of its existence.

Page 11 of 13
 [8] He has discovered the statutory option provided by the U.S. Congress at 26 USC §6013(g) and its
subsections and does now Revoke the Election, that was the etiology of the infectious financial
statutory disease that has resulted in lost compensation for my labor over many years, created by the
National Government.

(i) This REVOCATION OF ELECTION hereby made by __________________ is effective

immediately and is presented to the Office of the IRS Commissioner, et al, within the bureau of
the Internal Revenue Service.

(ii) As a result, the Internal Revenue Service has been effectively NOTICED of the
REVOCATION OF ELECTION and that per 26 USC §6013(g)(6) the REVOCATION
OF ELECTION is now permanent.

(1) Never again can he be coerced, compelled, or goaded back into the nefariously
created statutory scheme of the National Government. He must now be properly
identified by those within the Internal Revenue Service as one who is a Lawful Non-
Taxpayer and that the scope of the statutory revenue laws within Title 26 are not applicable
toward him. The Internal Revenue Service now recognizes by the REVOCATION OF
ELECTION that he is neither the subject nor the object of federal revenue laws.

[9] The Internal Revenue Service is now formally notified of the REVOCATION OF
ELECTION by ___________________ and there can be no further discussion as to his ever being
liable for making a federal income tax return. The IRS records and databases must now reflect this
termination of election and all Chapter 24 withholdings must cease for all time in compliance.

REVOCATION OF ELECTION IS NOW LEGALLY ESTABLISHED

____________________ has now properly followed the statutory instructions at 26 USC §6013(g)(4)(A)
as created by the US Congress in ending his former participation in the federal income taxation
scheme which was initially established via a ‘sub silentio election’.

Congress, and the IRS, now by statutory requirement recognizes his unalienable rights as a lawful Non-
Taxpayer of the Congressional income taxation statutes and regulations.

UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC,
WHICH IS WITHOUT THE STATUTORY UNITED STATES [THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA] AND
IN ACCORDANCE WITH 28 USC 1746(1) IN ORDER TO BE AS PRECISE AS POSSIBLE,
______________________ DOES HEREBY STATE THE FOLLOWING:
I, ____________________, DECLARE OR AFFIRM BY PENALTY OF PERJURY WITHOUT THE
STATUTORY UNITED STATES THAT THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING REPRESENTATIONS,
FEDERAL LAWS, AND ATTACHMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING, AND BELIEF.

_______________________ ____________________________________________________
Date Name
American National with Inalienable Rights
All Rights Reserved, UCC 1-207

Mailing Address: _____________________________

SSN: ____________________

CC: IRS Commissioner & DIRECTOR IRS Service Center

Page 12 of 13
 NOTARY

STATE OF THE UNION, ____________ COUNTY OF _____________

On this _______ day of ______________, 20____, before me, the undersigned Notary Public,

personally appeared ____________________________, proved to me through satisfactory evidence of

(signer of document)

identification, which was a passport __________ /_________, to be the person who signed the preceding or
(passport #/exp. date)

attached document in my presence, and who swore or affirmed to me that the contents of the document are

truthful and accurate to the best of his knowledge and belief.

______________________________________ ____________________________________
(official signature and seal of Notary) (commission expiration date)
NOTE: Use of the notary public is for verification of signature and identity confirmation only. It implies no consent to federal jurisdiction under the Buck Act as one is 'without the jurisdiction of the
District of Columbia'.

PROOF OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that I am an adult over 18 years of age and have served ___________________________
(name of agency or person served)

with a true copy of the within document personally or by certified mail with return receipt requested
(circle one)

by dropping in the U.S. Mail to the address above, from ________________________________________.

(city and state mail was sent from)

_____________________________________ _________________________
(signature of individual serving this document) (date)

Please find an attached copy of the cover letter and Affidavit of Citizenship Evidence, already on file with the
US Secretary of State, declaring my status as a ‘national’ (national status declaration is not to be construed as
any form of a ‘sovereign’ or a ‘sovereign citizen’ declaration or claim). The Affidavit of Citizenship Evidence
was submitted to the Secretary of State of the United States on or about ____Date____.

This document shall serve as formal legal notice. Consequently, if you DO NOT respond within 45 days, then
by your default and silence, the Revocation of Election is granted and there is no need to further contact me
regarding this matter.

Please place this and all attached Revocation of Election documentation related to this legal notification in the
IRS Records and Databases in or at the records location appropriate to my historical, current and future
administrative IRS file.

Page 13 of 13