Argument 1: Women’s Role in Peace Processes Enhances Sustainability of
Peace
1. Core Idea: Research shows that peace agreements are more successful and
sustainable when women are actively involved. Their inclusion leads to solutions that
better address the needs of all community members, not just the combatants.
2. Supporting Evidence: Studies indicate that peace processes with women’s
participation are 35% more likely to last at least 15 years. Women bring unique
perspectives on the social and humanitarian aspects of conflict, ensuring more
comprehensive peace plans.
3. Switzerland’s Position: As a proponent of Resolution 1325 (on Women, Peace, and
Security), Switzerland advocates for inclusive peace processes. We believe lasting
peace is built by considering diverse perspectives, especially from those who directly
face the impacts of conflict.
4. Key Message: “Switzerland calls on this committee to ensure that women have a
central role in all peace-building efforts, as their voices are essential to creating
inclusive, lasting peace.”
5. “Women’s Role in Peace Processes Enhances Sustainability of Peace—
—Studies show that peace agreements with women’s involvement are
35% more likely to last over 15 [Link] firmly believes that
including women in peace negotiations is not just beneficial but essential
for long-term [Link] a country committed to Resolution 1325,
Switzerland advocates for the inclusion of women in peace-building.
We’ve seen that sustainable peace is achievable only when diverse
perspectives, especially women’s, are represented. Switzerland urges this
committee to make women’s participation in peace efforts a priority,
recognising that their unique contributions lead to more enduring peace.”
“Studies show peace agreements with women’s involvement are 35% more likely to
last.”
“Switzerland believes lasting peace requires diverse perspectives. Women bring
essential insights to peace-building.”
: “As a supporter of Resolution 1325, Switzerland advocates for women’s inclusion in
peace efforts.”
“We urge the committee to prioritize women’s participation to create stronger,
sustainable peace.”
Argument 2: Empowerment through Education and Leadership Training
1. Core Idea: Women’s participation in peace-building is limited by lack of access to
education and leadership training, especially in conflict zones. Addressing these gaps
can transform women from passive observers to active decision-makers in peace
processes.
2. Supporting Evidence: In areas where women are educated and empowered to lead,
they significantly contribute to community stability and are able to mediate
effectively in local conflicts. Programs that educate women in negotiation and
leadership foster resilience and social cohesion.
3. Switzerland’s Position: Switzerland supports initiatives that train women in
leadership and mediation skills, believing this will strengthen communities. We have
funded educational programs for women in conflict zones and advocate for similar
measures worldwide.
4. Key Message: “Switzerland urges the UNCSW to prioritize educational initiatives
that prepare women as peace-builders. This investment will yield leaders who are
equipped to stabilize communities and build sustainable peace from within.”
“Empowerment through Education and Leadership Training—In
areas where women receive leadership training, local peace initiatives
have led to faster recovery and [Link] sees education as a
powerful tool for peace. When women are trained as leaders and
negotiators, they strengthen their communities and foster long-term
[Link] has funded programs to train women in conflict zones,
equipping them to lead in times of crisis. We believe that by empowering
women, we can stabilise communities from the ground [Link]
calls on this committee to prioritise programs that equip women with
leadership skills, knowing that educated women are invaluable assets to
sustainable peace.”
“Educating women as leaders helps stabilize communities.”
“When trained, women become powerful peace-builders and mediators.”
“Switzerland funds programs to train women in conflict zones.”
“We encourage investing in women’s leadership to strengthen peace from within
communities.”
Argument 3: Addressing Cultural and Institutional Barriers
1. Core Idea: Cultural biases and institutional discrimination often exclude women from
formal peace processes. Overcoming these barriers requires structural changes and
specific policies that create space for women in decision-making roles.
2. Supporting Evidence: In countries where policies mandate women’s involvement in
governance, there’s greater gender representation in peace processes. For example,
Rwanda, with one of the highest rates of female parliamentary representation, shows
that institutional support can change cultural perceptions and allow women to
contribute actively to governance.
3. Switzerland’s Position: Switzerland supports gender-sensitive policies that break
down these barriers, advocating for flexible systems in peace-building institutions to
accommodate women’s unique contributions.
4. Key Message: “Switzerland believes that dismantling institutional and cultural
barriers is essential for peace processes to be truly representative. We urge the
committee to adopt gender-sensitive policies that ensure women’s full participation
and influence.”
“Addressing Cultural and Institutional Barriers—For too long, cultural
and institutional barriers have sidelined women from formal peace
[Link] believes that true peace requires dismantling these
obstacles. To achieve representation, we need flexible, gender-sensitive
systems in [Link] countries like Rwanda, policy changes have led to
greater female representation in decision-making, proving that these
barriers can be [Link] urges this committee to create
policies that actively remove cultural and institutional barriers. Only then
can we ensure that peace processes truly reflect all voices, leading to
stronger, more inclusive outcomes.”
“Cultural barriers often exclude women from peace talks.”
“Switzerland believes peace-building requires removing these barriers for true inclusivity.”
“Policies in Rwanda have shown that structural changes make women’s participation
possible.”
“We call for gender-sensitive policies to ensure peace processes reflect all voices.”
SPEECH SOLUTIONS
1. Provide Training Programs for Women in Conflict Zones
o Goal: Prepare women to actively participate in peace talks and negotiations.
o How: Offer programs that teach leadership and negotiation skills to women
affected by conflict, so they’re equipped to represent their communities in
peace processes.
2. Ensure Fair Representation in Peace Negotiations
o Goal: Make sure women are included at every level of peace discussions.
o How: Set guidelines for peace talks that require a balanced mix of men and
women, allowing women to have equal opportunities to voice their ideas and
concerns.
3. Support Local, Women-Led Programs in Conflict Recovery Areas
o Goal: Empower communities by investing in women’s initiatives for
rebuilding.
o How: Provide funding to community programs led by women, as these efforts
often have the strongest impact on rebuilding and stabilizing areas after
conflict