0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views2 pages

Information Retrieval Exam Questions

ISR_Nov_Dec_2023 paper

Uploaded by

Manasi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views2 pages

Information Retrieval Exam Questions

ISR_Nov_Dec_2023 paper

Uploaded by

Manasi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Total No. of Questions : 8] SEAT No.

8
23
P-6628 [Total No. of Pages : 2

ic-
tat
[6181]-191

7s
6:4
B.E. (Information Technology)

02 91
3:3
INFORMATION AND STORAGE RETRIEVAL

0
31
0/1 13
(2019 Pattern) (Semester-VII) (414441)
0
1/2
Time : 2½ Hours] [Max. Marks : 70
.23 GP

Instructions to the candidates :


E
83

1) Answer Q1 or Q2, Q3 or Q4, Q5 or Q6, Q7 or Q8.

8
C

23
2) Neat diagrams must be drawn wherever necessary.

ic-
3) Figures to the right indicate full marks.
16

tat
8.2

4) Assume suitable data, if necessary.

7s
.24

6:4
91
Q1) a) Calculate the precision and recall scores for the search, using the given
49

3:3
data. [6]
30
31

A database contains 160 relevant records on a particular topic and a


01
02

search was conducted on that topic and 120 records were retrieved. Out
1/2
GP

of 120 records retrieved, 90 were relevant.


0/1

b) What are alternative measures used to evaluate system performance. [6]


CE
83

8
c) Explain in detail the term Precision and Recall. Explain with suitable

23
.23

examples. [6]
ic-
16

tat
OR
8.2

7s

Q2) a) What are User oriented measures used in performance evaluation of IR


.24

6:4

systems. [6]
91
49

3:3

b) Explain MRR and F-Score measures used in performance evaluation of


30

IR systems. [6]
31
01
02

c) Define and explain Interface support for search process related to


1/2

visualization in information system. [6]


GP
0/1
CE
83

Q3) a) What is distributed IR? Explain it with the help of Source Selection. [9]
.23

b) Explain model of Multimedia information retrieval. [8]


16

OR
8.2

P.T.O.
.24
49
Q4) a) What is multimedia IR? Explain the architecture of multimedia IR in detail.

8
23
[8]

ic-
b) Explain Collection Partitioning with respect to Distributed IR. [9]

tat
7s
Q5) a) What is page ranking? Explain role of ranking in web searching with

6:4
algorithm. [8]

02 91
3:3
0
b) Write a note on [10]

31
0/1 13
i) Request module and beautiful soup library.
0
1/2
.23 GP

ii) Web scraping


E
83

OR

8
C

23
ic-
Q6) a) Explain difference between centralized and distributed architecture of search
16

tat
engine. [9]
8.2

7s
b) What is web searching? Define and explain the following terms with
.24

6:4
91
respect to web searching [9]
49

3:3
30

i) Crawling
31
01
02

ii) Web directories


1/2
GP
0/1
CE
83

8
Q7) a) Differentiate Collaborative filtering and Content based Filtering. [8]

23
.23

ic-
b) Explain Vector Space Model for XML Retrieval. [9]
16

tat
8.2

OR
7s
.24

6:4

Q8) a) Explain Text-Centric and Data-Centric XML retrieval. [8]


91
49

3:3
30

b) Explain in detail Content Based Recommendation of documents. [9]


31
01
02
1/2


GP
0/1
CE
83
.23
16
8.2
.24

[6181]-191 2
49

Common questions

Powered by AI

Distributed Information Retrieval (IR) involves searching across multiple information sources spread over different locations. Source selection is crucial in distributed IR as it determines the most appropriate sources to query, improving retrieval efficiency and reducing irrelevant data processing. It ensures that the retrieval system accesses only those sources likely to contain relevant information, thus optimizing search performance and resource usage.

The vector space model for XML retrieval includes components such as term weighting, document vector formation, and similarity calculation. Term weights reflect the importance of terms based on their frequency, while document vectors represent the document in multi-dimensional space. The similarity between a query vector and document vectors is calculated, often using cosine similarity, to rank documents. These components improve search efficiency by enabling accurate relevance assessment based on term significance and inter-document context.

Centralized search engine architectures process queries through a single, often complex, system that indexes all content centrally. This can limit scalability and increase processing load. Distributed search engine architectures distribute the indexing and query processing across multiple nodes or sites, which improves scalability and fault tolerance. Distributed systems can handle larger data sets and queries more efficiently but require sophisticated source selection and result merging to ensure accurate and relevant search results.

Alternative measures used for evaluating IR systems include Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) and F-Score. MRR evaluates system performance in terms of the rank of the first relevant document, while F-Score combines precision and recall for a single score by calculating the harmonic mean. These measures help in assessing different aspects of system effectiveness beyond precision and recall alone.

Page ranking algorithms, such as Google PageRank, influence web searching by evaluating the importance of webpages based on link structure. The algorithm assigns a ranking score to pages based on their relevance and the number and quality of inbound links. This plays a critical role in search results by pushing higher-ranked pages toward the top in search engine result listings, driving traffic and visibility to those pages, and providing users with the most relevant content in response to their queries.

Content-based recommendation systems suggest documents similar to what a user has liked previously, based on item characteristics. The system analyzes features such as keywords, titles, or categories to recommend similar content. This approach is vital in information systems for enhancing user engagement by providing tailored content, thus supporting personal discovery in large data environments. However, it requires robust profiling and accurate document feature extraction to ensure recommendation accuracy.

The architecture of a multimedia information retrieval system involves several components: the feature extraction module, feature indexing, and retrieval interface. Unlike text-based systems that index words and phrases, multimedia IR systems index features such as color, texture, or shape for images, and sound patterns for audio. These systems use complex algorithms for feature extraction and comparison, accommodating the varied data types inherent in multimedia, thus supporting richer user queries and nuanced content analysis.

Precision and Recall are measures used to evaluate the effectiveness of a search retrieval system. Precision is the ratio of relevant items retrieved to the total items retrieved. For this scenario, Precision = Relevant Retrieved / Total Retrieved = 90/120 = 0.75. Recall is the ratio of relevant items retrieved to the total relevant items available. Recall for this scenario = Relevant Retrieved / Total Relevant = 90/160 = 0.5625. These scores indicate how well the retrieval system identifies relevant documents and minimizes the retrieval of irrelevant documents.

Text-centric XML retrieval focuses on the textual content within XML documents, requiring strategies such as keyword indexing and text-oriented search algorithms. Challenges include handling mixed content and optimizing retrieval for large textual datasets. Data-centric XML retrieval deals with structured data representation and metadata, requiring strategies like schema mapping and structured query processing. The main challenge here is efficiently traversing XML hierarchies and ensuring accurate data parsing for non-textual information.

Collaborative filtering bases recommendations on patterns in user behavior, such as past interactions and preferences, gathering data from multiple users to suggest items. In contrast, content-based filtering recommends items similar to those the user has already liked, based on item features. While collaborative filtering can be more diverse, it suffers from the cold start problem; content-based filtering, while limited to known preferences, can start providing recommendations immediately once a profile is established.

You might also like