Geodetic Surveying Techniques Explained
Geodetic Surveying Techniques Explained
INTRODUCTION
Each chapter begins with an
Introduction giving an overview of
Geodetic surveying consists of precisely measuring positions on the earth’s
surface, of a system of widely separated points. The positions are determined the chapter as well as its scope.
both relatively, in terms of the length and azimuths of the lines joining them, and
absolutely, in terms of the coordinates—latitude, longitude, and elevation above
mean sea level. These points (of observation) form the control points (stations) to
which topographic, hydrographic, engineering and other surveys may be referred
so as to localise the error between the geodetic stations.
In geodetic surveys, the horizontal control is established by precise traversing
or triangulation and the latter will be discussed in Chapter 2. To establish vertical
control there are two methods: precise levelling and trigonometric levelling. Precise
levelling has already been discussed in Surveying Vol. I, Chapter 6. It is similar
to spirit levelling but is carried out with greater refinement of instruments and
techniques.
Trigonometrical levelling may be defined as the process of determining the
relative elevations of different stations from observed vertical angles and known
distances—either horizontal or geodetic lengths at mean sea level. When the
horizontal distance between the points of interest is small, either the corrections
for curvature and refraction are neglected or are applied linearly to the calculated
difference in elevation. This is applicable for plane surveying and this method of
trigonometrical levelling is discussed in Surveying Vol. 1, Chapter 6. However,
when distances are large, the instrument station is located at the centre of the area
to observe the vertical angles outwards from this point. In this case, it is usual to
apply corrections for curvature and refraction in angular measures directly to the
observed vertical angles and the procedure is described in the present chapter.
The measurement of vertical angles between triangulation stations is usually
undertaken at the same time as that of horizontal angles. The concurrent observation
of the vertical angles alongwith the horizontal angles may prove to be economical,
and for that reason it may be convenient to deal with the determination of height
by the observation of vertical angles, rather than by precise levelling. However, the
method of trigonometrical levelling is less accurate than precise (spirit) levelling 352 Surveying
in flat terrains. In mountainous regions and rugged terrains, the method is of great
value, and the results are comparatively more accurate.
Figures
Figures have been used to
describe the instrument details for
visualisation in simplified ways.
A view of the intersection is shown in Fig. 9.5(e). For a user on the earth’s
surface, it is apparent that the lower point will be the true position. However, users
that are above the earth’s surface may employ measurements from satellites at
negative elevation angles. This complicates the determination of an unambiguous
solution. Airborne/spaceborne receiver solutions may be above or below the
270 Surveying
UP-TO-DATE Distortions or degradations in the image stem from the image acquisition process.
Therefore, the aim of image rectification and restoration is to correct the image
INFORMATION
data and is accomplished by offsetting problems with the band data by recalculating
the DN values. The factors that affect are the digital image acquisition type—
digital camera, along-track scanner, across-track scanner; platform—airborne vs.
satellite; and total field of view. The preprocessing operation attempts to correct
described. 2 h h 2 2 2
S
1 2m
1
2
2R the data may itself introduce errors. However, all these corrections might not
be required in every case and will depend upon the nature of information to be
where cosec =1+ 1 and = 0.06735 extracted from the data.
2S 2R
When the image data contains errors in the measured brightness values of the
pixels, it limits the ability of the analyst to visually interpret or quantitatively
process and analyse the images. The potential sources of errors are: periodic drift or
malfunctioning of a detector; electronic interference between sensor components;
and intermittent disruptions in data transmission and recording. Consequently, the
affects are: (i) a difference in the relative distribution of brightness over an image
in a given band than that in a ground scene and (ii) distortion of the relative
brightness of a single pixel from band to band compared with spectral reflectance
character of the corresponding region of the ground.
It, therefore, becomes necessary to apply the radiometric corrections—detector
response calibration, atmospheric correction, sun elevation correction, and earth-
sun distance correction (the error due to the detector response influences the
An observer standing on the deck of a ship just sees a lighthouse most)—by modifying DN values to account for noise. The correction involves a
top with his eye at a height of 9 m. The top of the lighthouse is 64 m above m.s.l.
Find the distance of the observer from the lighthouse. Examples
rearrangement of the DN in an image so that all areas have the same relationship
between the DN and either radiance or back-scatter.
Refer to Fig. 2.15. Detector within a sensor has a curvilinear
Let, AO = D1 and BO = D2. Examples help readers to relate
response to radiance and backscatter. Radiance is measure of the amount of
EM radiation leaving or arriving at a point on surface, whereas backscatter is
This is a problem of curvature and refraction.
We know that combined correction = 0.0673D2 and apply the chapter content to
Hence, 9 = 0.0673 AO2
9.00
SD-II_07.indd 270 real-life problems. 3/12/2013 12:10:24 PM
or AO = = 11.56 km
0.0673
64
and BO = = 30.83 km
0.0673
Hence, the distance between the observer and the lighthouse is Aerial Survey 219
= 11.56 + 30.83 = 42.39 km 5.23 Two consecutive photographs were taken with a camera of focal length 37.5 cm,
at a height of 7200 m. The overlap was exactly half and the prints were 22.5 cm
22.5 cm. The height was same for both the exposures and the aircraft flew on
even peel with no drift. The ground was flat at approximately 2500 m above m.s.l.
Determine the scale of the photograph and length of the air base.
[Ans. 1 cm = 125 m, 1.41 km]
5.24 An aircraft was flying 2300 m above a cliff, the difference in parallax between
whose top and bottom was 0.62 mm. Determine the height of the cliff, the base on
the photograph measured was 50 mm. [Ans. 28.52 m]
5.25 Explain why the heights of buildings, trees, etc., appear to be exaggerated when a
pair of vertical air photographs is viewed stereoscopically.
5.26 What is meant by stereophotography? Two distant objects, at the left and
right of photothedolite line of sight, make an angle of 47° on the instrument
SD-II_02.indd 41 3/8/2013 12:11:25 PM station. In the positive print, they are seen to be 70 mm left and 60 mm right of
the photo centre. Calculate the focal length of the camera lens.
[Ans. f = 149.35 mm]
OBJECTIVE-TYPE 5.1 A spatial view can be obtained with naked eyes for a distance up to
where, R is the actual range between receiver and satellite, is the wavelength,
N is the number of complete wavelengths between satellite and receiver, and is
the part wave length.
For EDM the modulation wavelength on the carrier wave is changed to establish
two or more data sets, allowing N to be eliminated from the calculations. With
xviii Visual Walkthrough satellite observations this is not possible because the satellite is continuously
moving, although two different carrier waves L1 and L2 are being transmitted
simultaneously. In order to make use of the carrier waves it is necessary to strip
off the binary code information, and there are various techniques for this, some
requiring knowledge of C/A and/or P code, which is not possible with anti-
spoofing (AS) active. The most common technique is squaring (no knowledge of
ranging codes is required), which has the added advantage of effectively doubling
the carrier frequency, hence halving the wavelength and allowing the millimetre
accuracy on the measurement. Unfortunately, squaring destroys the data transmitted
on the carrier that gives the satellite location and hence for accuracy it has to be
used with calculated data for the satellite’s positions.
If the world was like a laboratory with perfect laboratory conditions, basic GPS
would be a lot more accurate. Unfortunately, it is not so, and has plenty of
opportunities for a radio-based system that spans the entire planet to get fouled
up. Inaccuracies in GPS signals come from the variety of sources (Fig. 9.7), like
satellite clocks, imperfect orbits and especially from the signal’s trip through the
earth’s atmosphere. Since these inaccuracies are variable, it is hard to predict what
they will be in order to correct for them. Although, these errors are small, but to
get the kind of accuracies some critical positioning jobs require, all the errors,
no matter how minor, are to be minimised. What is needed is a way to measure
FIELD PROBLEMS the actual errors as they happen. The error sources can be classified into three
groups, namely satellite-related errors, propagation-medium related errors, and
APPENDICES
Appendices contain supplementary
matter helpful in enriching the
text.
1 mile = 1.6093 km
= 8 furlongs
= 1760 yards
= 5280 ft
= 63360 in.
1 furlong = 0.2012 km
= 220 yards
1 yard = 0.9144 m
1 ft = 0.3048 m
1 in. = 25.4000 mm
1 km = 0.6214 miles
= 1093.6106 yards 84 Surveying
1m = 1.0936 yards
= 3.2808 ft Let angle A be measured three times by the repetition method
= 39.36998 in.
1 mm = 0.0394 in. A Weight
1 nautical mile = 6080 ft 48°20 8 3
= 1853.1886 m 48°20 10 2
Quantification
1 cable = 100 fathoms
48°20 12 3
1 fathom = 6 ft
= 1.8288 m Sum of the weights = 3 + 2 + 3 = 8
1 bar = 105 N/m2 Weighted arithmetic mean
Quantification of instrumental
1 knot
1° latitude
=
=
1 nautical mile
111.21 km = 48°20 +
8
1
× (8 × 3 + 10 × 2 + 12 × 3)
Angle Weight
= 46°30 30 3
= 24°42 20 2
1 6
Weight of + (71°12 50 ) = =
SD-II_Appendices.indd 467 3/8/2013 11:46:05 AM 1 1 5
3 2
1 6
Weight of – (21°28 10 ) = =
1 1 5
3 2
4. If a quantity is multiplied by a factor, the weight of the product is equal to
the weight of that quantity divided by the square of the factor.
For example, if angle = 32°12 12 and weight = 2, then
2 2
weight of 3 (96°36 36 ) = 2
3 9
5. If a quantity is divided by a factor, the weight of the result equals the weight
of that quantity multiplied by the square of that factor.
For example, if angle = 41°31 15 and weight = 2, then
weight of (13°50 45 ) = 2 × 32 = 18
3
Prelims of [Link] 18 6. If an equation is multiplied by its own weight, the weight of the 3/21/2013
resulting 12:49:34 PM
equation is equal to the reciprocal of the weight of the equation.